What do you suppose it might be that motivates those blacks who choose to make politics a career, to do so under the banner of the Democrat Party. Because you would think that with its rather checkered history regarding how it has, as a party, treated, or dare I say mistreated, blacks for centuries, most responsible blacks would, or so you would think, not want to associate with a political party that has such a history. But oddly enough, that seems not to be the case. And not only do they themselves become proud members of the party, but they also work very hard in what has been a decades-long effort to convince blacks that they should as well.
a "Backwoods" Conservative
"If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear." ― George Orwell
Monday, October 14, 2024
DEMOCRATS NERVOUS BLACKS MAY BE LEAVING THE PLANTATION…
What do you suppose it might be that motivates those blacks who choose to make politics a career, to do so under the banner of the Democrat Party. Because you would think that with its rather checkered history regarding how it has, as a party, treated, or dare I say mistreated, blacks for centuries, most responsible blacks would, or so you would think, not want to associate with a political party that has such a history. But oddly enough, that seems not to be the case. And not only do they themselves become proud members of the party, but they also work very hard in what has been a decades-long effort to convince blacks that they should as well.
Saturday, October 12, 2024
CUMALA’S DEFENDERS STUBBORNLY ATTEMPT TO DEFEND THE INDEFENSIBLE…
I’m likely dating myself here, but how many out there remember Sargeant Schultz from the old sitcom, ‘Hogan’s Heros?’ And if you do remember the amiable, slightly overweight, Sargeant, then you will also very likely remember his favorite motto, “I know nothing, I see nothing,” And it’s that same phrase that would also seem to be the motto of so many in our ‘fake news’ media. I say that because it’s so many of them that seem quite content to turn a blond eye to that which is so obvious to most of us who reside outside of their bizarre little clique comprised solely of those who essentially view things from the same, rather skewed, perspective.
OBAMA CHOOSES TO LECTURE BLACK MEN ON VOTING FOR CUMALA…
I truly do believe that there has never been, nor will there ever be again, a more arrogant, narcissistic politician than Barack Obama, whom I will refer to from here on out as ‘BO’. And I also truly believe that the man thinks of himself as a God, or at least God-like, and as such is capable of being able to convince people to do something that they would not otherwise do. Yes, there are those who do view him in that way, but they also tend to be the weak-minded, and easily convinced among us. And, of course, there are those others who pretend, those who are nothing more than bit players who, for whatever reason, contribute to the continuing charade.
Friday, October 11, 2024
CUMALA, WHEN BEING DIFFERENT IS REALLY BEING THE SAME…
I’m sure that by now everyone has heard, ad nauseam, all of the many claims made by Cumala, and any number of her idiotic surrogates, about how she is somehow to be considered as the candidate of change. But it’s been all of them, including the candidate herself, who have been rather spectacularly short on the specifics of exactly what that might actually mean. In fact, when the candidate herself was asked what she would do differently than Joy, she said she couldn’t think of a thing that she would do, or would’ve done, differently from what Joey had done. Not exactly a ringing endorsement when considering voting for the ‘candidate of change.'
Thursday, October 10, 2024
MSDNC SAYS SUPPORTERS OF PRESIDENT TRUMP HAVE NO SOULS…
So I’m sitting here wondering just when it might be, and/or what it might take, for all of those on the other side to finally throw in the towel when it comes to their continuing effort to mock, ridicule and malign those of us who not only continue to support President Trump, but also who have every intention of voting for him once again. Because as much as they might wish for it to be so, we’re not going anywhere. We will stay put no matter how much they may mock, ridicule or malign us. These people are scum, who seem to think that by attacking us they somehow add something to their own drab and pathetic little lives. And how disgusting is that?
Wednesday, October 9, 2024
CHARLAMAGNE THA GOD, JUST ANOTHER LOW INFORMATION CLOWN…
Yup, you may not be able to rely on Democrats for much that’s useful, but you can always depend on them to spout some of the most idiotic drivel you’ve ever heard. Case in point would be that former drug dealer and now host of something called ‘The Breakfast Club’ radio show, Lenny tha Loser, aka Charlamagne tha God. You see it was Lenny who recently stated the obvious when he said the “America first” and “MAGA” platform of President Trump is resonating with voters this election year, while Cumala feels “out of touch,” especially as Joey/Cumala facilitates $157 million in aid to Lebanon while hurricane victims at home continue to suffer and search for answers.
Tuesday, October 8, 2024
MSDNC ONCE AGAIN SHOWS US WHAT STUPID LOOKS LIKE!!!
Something that I’m pretty sure will come as a surprise to virtually no one is how the journalistic geniuses at MSDNC persist in thinking that those on the left are the only sane ones. Oddly enough they seem to have come to the conclusion that one would have to be certifiably insane to not vote for Democrats. After all, what other possible reason could there be? Meanwhile, it’s those of us out here in the real world who have a slightly different view of things. You see, it’s most of us who think one would have to be a complete moron to vote for any Democrat. I guess if you derive pleasure from high crime, high inflation and an open border, Democrats are your kind of people.
Sunday, October 6, 2024
THOSE COMPLAINING THE MOST ABOUT DISINFORMATION, TEND TO BE THE BIGGEST PURVERYORS OF DISINFORMATION…
You would think that as obvious as the Democrats have been, and continue to be, about where it is that they wish to take this country, and how they intend to get it there, it would be fewer and fewer Americans that would actually be willing to vote them into office. But oddly enough, it seems that it’s just the opposite that appears to be the case. You see, it’s millions of Americans who somehow remain convinced that those in the Democrat Party, those who very clearly care only about themselves and their party, genuinely care about them. I must say that it’s these people who have now managed to take gullibility to what is clearly a whole new level.
Friday, October 4, 2024
JANUARY 20, 2021…A DAY THAT WILL LIVE IN INFAMY???
I have likely asked this question before, but is there a bigger lying skank in all of Congress than Nancy Pelosi? Somehow, I just don’t think so. And I say that because President Trump, regardless of how it came to be, has not been in office since January 20, 2021, when Joey, and his sidekick Cumala, first slithered into office. And yet, Pelosi, along with any number of other Democrats, claims that the recent escalation of the ongoing conflict taking place in the Middle East, like everything else that has gone so horribly wrong since that day, is to be blamed on President Trump. And as ludicrous as that may sound that’s their story and, by God, they’re sticking to it.
Thursday, October 3, 2024
WITH LIBERALS, SOMETIMES A LITTLE “MANSPLAINING” IS CALLED FOR!!!
At first, I wasn’t going to say anything, I was just going to consider the source and let it slide. Hence my delay in making any sort of a comment on this past Tuesday night’s ‘debate’ between JD Vance, ‘Tampon Tim’ A-Walz, and the two CBS ‘moderators,’ and I use that term very, very loosely. Now while I don’t want to seem like I’m piling on, these two ‘moderators’ have clearly provided more than enough reason to never again have two female ‘moderators.’ For one reason, both demonstrated and serious lack of both knowledge and understanding of the truly important issues and it seemed like it might have been ‘that time of the month’ for both of them.
WALLACE: Can I say something about the
moderators? They did a great job and they also used their mic-muting power We
spent a lot of time on it before the debate. I actually think if you’re a
woman, that might be the worst moment JD Vance had because he was going to
mansplain right over that mute button. He was, and again, I don’t pretend to
know how everyone will react to this, I think that a lot of women in positions
of authority that should command respect just by virtue of that dynamic will
see themselves and some dude that, disrespected them and talk over them.
There was a moment like that in the
Harris-Pence vice-presidential debate, where she said, “I’m speaking.” There’s
this real belief that what he was saying was more important than the debate
rules and the moderators.
MADDOW: And to Joy’s point — the substance of that moment was when he was lying about immigrants in Springfield, Ohio again, and Tim Walz had called him out on it and then was saying, ‘Oh, no, no, no, I’m not lying, let me tell you why I’m calling them illegal immigrants,’ even though they are not illegal immigrants and let me mansplain the law to you. And the moderators at that point muted his mic and said, “Thank you for explaining the law. That’s not what we’re asking."
‘Womansplaining’ is the only thing that I saw on display Tuesday night. Also known as being a bitch. Vance’s closing remark should have included, “Thank you for the opportunity to debate the three of you.” I mean, clearly, we had one young man who’s clearly comfortable in his own skin and perfectly confident in his own masculinity. And then we had an old man who looked a bit like Don Rickles on massively high doses of amphetamines. Yes, Vance is a man, he is both educated and successful. Meanwhile. A-Walz and moderators are all clearly stupid. So, what should Vance have done instead, simply allowed them to continue to be stupid?
“Mansplaining” is, of course, nothing more than a liberal sniveling catch phrase, a euphemism, to enable liberals to focus their hatred or their prodigious sniveling about some imaginary thing. Just like systemic racism, global warming, white supremacists, voter suppression, diversity training, democratic socialism, safe space, social justice, undocumented immigrant, human infrastructure, structural racism, common sense gun control, hate speech, toxic masculinity, micro-aggression, racial justice, white privilege, gun violence, community activist, climate justice, white nationalists, white Christian nationalists, implicit bias, moral infrastructure, non-binary and more.
I mean, do these women really not understand just how truly stupid they sound when using the term “mansplaining?” They sound like unserious, sophomoric, little college girls. Personally, whenever I hear this type of leftist girl jargon, I completely tune out anything that comes forth from the speaker’s mouth. I get the impression that these women live in a world of feminist cliches where real men are few, submissive or condescending toward them. They sound totally brainwashed, as if they live in a cult. And may I just point out that O’Donnell and Brennan are clearly both idiots, to the point where no amount of “mansplaining” is going to help them to understand.
Mansplaining is term that feminists like to use to harass intelligent men. They get aggravated any time any man shows the least bit of intelligence because it contradicts their bigoted ideology that claims all men are stupid. Any woman who claims to have been “mansplained,” most likely needed it. Feminists hate the fact that they women; they want to be men and therefore hate men because they aren’t one. And if you think that sounds crazy; you would, of course, be spot on. They are crazy, bat shit crazy. In fact, it’s Maddow who spends every broadcast “mansplaining.” I wouldn’t be surprised to find out that she has more testosterone than old A-Walz.
So, to believe their claim you must believe two things: 1) A-Walz is an effeminate girly-man, who cannot defend himself, and 2) The moderators KNEW the premise of their argument was faulty (a lie) and could not emotionally handle being exposed to the truth. Ladies, you really shouldn’t be offended when someone sees that you’re obviously confused, or negligent of the facts, and goes out of their way in an attempt to bring you up to speed. When all else fails, those on the left will always try to play victim. If you’re a man and you take time to explain ANYTHING to others, they always try to hide their stupidity by making you seem like the bad guy.
These race whiners and sex whiners, the flakes and the fairies are really that all the left has, and they’re absolutely pathetic. The lack of self-awareness is always stunning. Laying out the FACTS in the face of aggressively biased media types is NOT “mansplaining” (an Ebonics based ghetto term if ever there was one), it’s called discourse, the arguing of facts. Maybe there shouldn’t be women moderators, if a candidate can’t respond to lies that they’re pushing? Have only men do these debates and be a bit more insistent regarding the ‘news’ organizations involved. These are quite the trash talkers, but they clutch their pearls at anyone pushing back on them.
And when a man responds to a woman who is being rude, disrespectful and blatantly lying, it isn't “mansplaining.” These clowns should at least try to be adult enough to acknowledge when you’ve been caught out in a lie and corrected. I must say, that Mr. Vance was far more respectful than he needed to be when addressing those two biased idiots. No matter what President Trump or Mr. Vance may say, the left is going to dig up ways to criticize them. Again, it’s all they have. They can’t talk about policy or achievements, and they don’t do interviews. They simply use teams of people to dig up excuses and dirt on any candidate but always go overboard.
If “mansplaining” is defined as correcting a false narrative or statement, which is exactly what Mr. Vance was doing, then I’ll accept that definition. More often than not, you have to mansplain to liberal women. Most of the time they only hear what they want to hear the first time you say something to them. So, often times you find yourself having to repeat yourself in small, easy to understand bit and pieces for them in order for improve the odds of them actually being able to understand what was being said. Then when the dim light above their head finally lights up, they get all mad because you treated them like the child they are. It’s really quite bizarre.