OPRAH WINFREY FOR PRESIDENT??? ARE THE DEMOCRATS THAT DESPERATE???

All we who first supported candidate Trump, and now support President Trump have heard ad nauseam for over two years now, is how the man is a racist, a white supremacist, a Klan supporter and/or a Nazi.  Accusations hurled at him with nothing to back them up, because, quite literally, there is nothing in the man’s past that would seem to indicate that he is any of these things, or ever has been.  Meanwhile it is over in the Democrat Party that rumor now has it that there is someone expressing an interest in running for president 2020, and that some see this person as representing their best chance to beat Trump.  And while this person cannot be said to be a white supremacist, they can, most definitely, be said to be not only a racist but a practitioner of what is, quite possibly, the worst kind of racism there is.  And yet, that seems to be of little concern among Democrats since this person comes from within their own ranks, it also seems to matter very little to those Democrats busy demanding the impeachment of Donald Trump.

And of course the person of whom I speak is none other than Oprah Winfrey.  Winfrey, as you may recall, was a very vocal supporter of that other obvious racist, ex-president Barack Obama.  I’ve always thought it bit odd that there could be so many blacks, including very wealthy ones, willing to support the very same political party that has done more to suppress blacks than any other organization in American history.  And how it is that they seem so willing to overlook the party’s long history of racism that goes back nearly 200 years.  What does it say about someone who is black and can still so casually overlook the actions of a political party that brought about what they themselves call the darkest period in American history?  And I do wonder, as I did during Barry’s time on office, what are the true priorities of blacks today.  Is it to seek some sort of retribution, or payback against whites, even though no whites today ever owned slaves?  And do these same blacks perhaps see the Democrat Party as being their best avenue for accomplishing that.

And I have no doubt that Winfrey would be able to garner for herself no less than 99 percent of that black vote, because she possesses exactly what that same percentage of blacks look for in a candidate, that being, of course, the fact that she’s black and pretty far to the left.  But by electing another black president, especially after the last one who left the black community far worse off than it was when he found it, would I be considered as being out of place by asking just what is it that blacks would be seeking in electing another black president?  I mean, are they genuinely interested in improving their lot in life?  Do they actually want to work and to make enough money to support themselves and their families?  Or, have the majority of blacks in this country now become quite satisfied with the way things are and are willing to vote for whomever it is that offers the best chance of maintaining things as they are.  They seem quite content to go through life as nothing more than parasites upon those who do want to work and to become self-sufficient.

Since 1960 there have been five Democrat presidents with each one being a little further to the left than the one who came before him, culminating with Barry who was really nothing more than a devoted Socialist.  And how is it that the lives of blacks in America has been made better by having voted for Democrats over the course of the last nearly 60 years?  And how much better would their lives be today if it had been Hitlery who had won that last election and not President Trump?  And after eight long years of having a black president was there any measurable improvement in the lives of those in black community?  Now as someone on the outside looking in I would think that the eight years of Obummer would be more than sufficient to convince even the most liberal of blacks that they’d doing themselves no favors by electing yet another black president, yet I’m quite sure they would be compelled to do so regardless of the fact that they would stand to gain very little from having done so.     

It wasn’t all that long ago that Winfrey was heard to say that she “will never run for public office.”  But with that said, she did recently take the time to promote a recent article in the New York Post, one by John Podhoretz, the topic of which was that she, Winfrey, would the Democrat Party’s best hope for the 2020 election.  The title of the article was, “Democrats’ best hope for 2020: Oprah”, about which she later tweeted out, “Thanks for your VOTE of confidence!”  Now if I recall correctly, Podhoretz was another of those ‘conservatives’ who operated under the ‘NeverTrump’ banner.  And I can only assume that he remains less than a fan of the president.  His piece argued that Winfrey, 63, is effectively the perfect foil to President Donald Trump.  Mr. Podhoretz wrote, “She is the mirror image of Trump, but more so. Of course, she’s female and he’s male; she’s America’s generous aunt and he’s America’s crazy uncle.  And yes, she’s black and he’s white, she’s liberal and he’s whatever he is.”  Mirror image?  Sorry, I hate to disagree, but I’m just not seeing it!

And it was also in his little piece of wishful thinking, perhaps, that Mr. Podhoretz went on to write, “It goes beyond that. He’s rich and she’s rich, but she made her $3 billion herself and with no controversy.  She is, in herself, the embodiment of the American Dream.  He got famous from TV, and so did she, but she became vastly more famous and vastly more successful at it.”  And then he added, “As for politics, it’s worth remembering that Oprah played a not-insubstantial role in the 2008 election…A 2008 study at the University of Maryland suggested that Winfrey herself was responsible for more than 1 million votes cast for Obama in the Democratic contest — which suggests he might not have prevailed had she not campaigned on his behalf.”  Now I think it’s more than a stretch to claim that she’s the embodiment of the American dream, that’s spoken like a true ‘NeverTrumper.’  I’m not sure what might have motivated Mr. Podhoretz other than that he still hasn’t gotten over the fact that our president today is Donald J. Trump.

Winfrey may want to reconsider as it’s already getting a little crowded with her fellow liberal loons like Kanye, Zuckerberg, The Rock, and all the other millionaire celebrities who think they now deserve to be elected. The same celebrities like herself who are stupid enough to believe Trump was elected president because he was rich and famous.  Democrats just don't understand. They think they lost because they didn't have the right celebrity.  They think next time they just have to pick a celebrity that people like.  Trump didn’t win because he was a celebrity, he won because of his ideas.  Liberals worship people and join the cult of personality.  Conservatives want to know what you're going to do.  They want action!  A liberal, Black, racist, rich woman without any serious credentials drafted to be the next Democrat president by some New York ‘conservative’ after proclaiming Hitlery the inevitable POTUS just a few short months ago.  The Democrats have more serious problems than to consider this charade.

Personally, I’m thinking that it might be way too early for another black to try to run for president.  That horse, as they say, has left the barn.  The country has already been effectively relieved of their white guilt, that was accomplished by putting someone into the office based solely on their race.  But then again, she is a female so maybe she could come at it from that direction.  I guess that would be another possible way for her to appeal to those on the left.  The Democrat Party cannot be honest about their positions on those issues important to the American people.  If they were they’d never win another election.  So they bully the non-complyers with demeaning accusations hoping that the gullible will believe them.  Obummer won using such tactics and he turned out to be a liar and a fraud and we’re still removing the scum he left behind to destroy Trump.  President Trump is our only hope to save America.  Winfrey, or any Democrat drives us toward full communism, as the Democrats desperately want power, power, and more power.

RUTH ‘BUZZY’ GINSBURG, “SEXISM IS WHY HITLERY LOST.”

Democrats/Liberals/progressives/socialists, or whatever moniker they wish to go by these days, it’s those on the left who really do live in what can only be described as being a constant state of denial.  Because it’s whenever they lose any sort of contest that it must always be because either someone cheated or those responsible for electing, or selecting, the winner were somehow biased against them.  It can never be because they were a poor candidate or a contestant lacking the necessary talent to actually win.  Such is the case with Hitlery, who over the course of the last 10 months has blamed everyone, and everything, imaginable for losing a contest that nearly all but her opponent thought that she had in the bag.  Everyone but herself, that is.

And it has been 99 percent of those involved in the state-controlled media who have been doing their best to bolster her claims that she was somehow robbed of her much deserved victory by Donald Trump.  Because there is simply no way that he could have possibly won without cheating.  And now joining in the blame-everything-but-Hitlery-game is none other than Supreme Court Justice ‘Ruth Buzzy’ Ginsburg, who believes sexism is what really put President Trump in the White House.  It was when asked by the Communist Broadcasting System’s (CBS) Charlie Rose in an interview conducted earlier this week that she said, “I have no doubt that it did.”  Old ‘Buzzy’ went on to add that sexism “was a major, major factor” in Hitlery’s devastating loss last year. 

Now for those able to remember, old ‘Buzzy’ made no such comments back in 2008 when it was Obummer who handily defeated Hitlery, ruining her historic moment of becoming the first female U.S. president.  But then, perhaps that has much more to do with ‘Buzzy’s’ personal feelings toward President Trump.  After all, she was one of the harsher critics of then candidate Trump, going so far as to once tell The New York Times that she couldn’t imagine him as president and the negative affects he would have on the country.  ‘Buzzy’ said it would only be four years for the country but for the Supreme Court, “It could be — I don’t even want to contemplate that.”  Now she has since apologized for those comments, so that makes it alright. 

The Democrats remind me of an old soap opera. They use the same plot in every show and continue to get away with their bad acting.  Can you imagine the Democrats if they were unable to use the ‘blame game?’  If they weren't protected by the state-controlled media and were instead made to abide by the same rules they impose on everyone else?  Can you imagine the Democrats if they always had to make very clear what it is that they truly do stand for?  Imagine if the Democrats we held accountable to the same regulations that they impose upon their enemies, we the American people. They’d never win another election.  They continue to thrive only because their supporters are comprised of some of the most ignorant people on the planet.

And when it comes to old ‘Buzzy’, she’s the type of individual that Liberal Democrats and RINO Republicans love to first nominate and then expend every effort to get them quickly confirmed.  And they do this because they know these people are far less interested in determining the constitutionality of any law than they are in dreaming up new ways to ‘interpret’ what the Constitution says.  It’s called judicial activism.  Old ‘Buzzy’ has proven time and time again that she has no business being a Supreme Court Justice.  Her opinions as a Justice are extreme.  At least she was truthful when saying many women voted for Hitlery because Hitlery said vote for me if you are a woman because I am a woman.  If that doesn’t define ‘sexism’, what does?

Let’s face it, had Hitlery not been a woman, she would have never received her party’s nomination in the first place.  And she lost the election not because Trump cheated, but because people saw how she had received preferential treatment and was let off the hook for the minimum of 58 felonies that she committed, but wasn't prosecuted for, not to mention her ‘Pay to play’ with the Clinton foundation.  I mean, how else does someone who's ‘serving’ our nation end up with $200 Million, plus, fortune on a $186,000 a year salary?  Or was it her consistently horrible performance first as a U.S. Senator and then as Secretary of State, her extreme progressive views, specifically in relation to the promises she made regarding the Supreme Court?

Far from deserving to be in the White House, or allowed to remain free to go across the country on a book tour where she charges folks $300 a pop just to sign her book, Hitlery should instead be serving a life sentence in Leavenworth.  ‘Buzzy’ yet again shows her own bias in failing to see that Hitlery's behavior has been abhorrent and is what resulted in many voters coming to see her as being profoundly untrustworthy and therefore not worthy of their vote.  That’s why she lost.  And yet Ginsburg can blame, and with what I can only guess is her version of a straight face, Hitlery’s defeat on ‘sexism.’  Which says much more about her mind than it does about any actual events or circumstances surrounding our most recent presidential election. 

Look, we all know that Obummer won the presidency with more than 95% of blacks voting for him instead of the white guys, McCain or Romney, then men who ran against him.  So could we possibly expect to hear from old ‘Buzzy’ how it was that the only reason Obummer was able to win either election was because of racism?  Somehow I doubt it.  And you know, since when does simply by virtue of you being a female, erase the fact that you are nothing more than a cheating, lying, criminal politician and grifter?  Hitlery was rejected because everyone who possess a vagina failed to vote for her because she has a vagina.  Vaginas do not create anything notable concerning ones character.  And Hitlery is evidence of that fact.

But in a way, I guess you could say that old ‘Buzzy’ is correct when she says that sexism played a major role in our last election.  But that would only be because the Democrats were desperate in their attempt to elect a president based solely on the gender of their candidate and not on any specific qualifications that she can be said to have possessed.  And they promoted the kind of agenda that women able to think for themselves, and who didn't want to vote for Hitlery, would never support.  And then Democrats said those women were stupid and unintelligent.  Yup, that's sexism alright.   Good thing many women didn't buy into that crap and helped to elect a real president, one who represents all of us not just one of the many ‘victim’ groups.

ALABAMA: MONEY VERSUS ISSUES…

While I will agree that there was much to cheer about regarding the election results in Alabama last night, with the victory of Judge Roy Moore over Luther Strange, there was also much to be concerned about.  The good news is, of course, that the campaign of Judge Moore, while it may have been overwhelmed by a flood of GOP Establishment political cash, it was still able to come out victorious.  The bad news is that there were, quite literally, millions of dollars essentially flushed down the toilet in the effort to beat back Moore, millions of dollars that could have been put to much better use against the Democrats. 

Now the full accounting of just how much money was blown in the attempt to bestow the Republican nomination upon ‘Big Luther’ Strange will have to wait for weeks, as the campaign finance filings begin to slowly trickle in.  But it likely amounted to tens of millions of dollars, with some estimates going as high as $30 million, raised by the Chamber of Commerce, by Mitch McConnell’s political action committees, and by other political vehicles of the Republican political establishment.  And though it was all for naught there is little cause to cheer, because it was all a waste.  But as long as there some hope, the money continued to be spent.   

Because for all of that flood of campaign cash, Strange still lost in a landslide.  In fact, it couldn’t have been worse if not one dime had been spent to promote Strange’s doomed candidacy.  So why didn’t all that money work?  After all, for all those many years, money appeared to be the most important deciding factor in American politics.  Whoever raised the most and therefore could spend the most would win.  And, as a result, the donor class rose to power and was able to direct the Republican Party to adopt its positions on key issues, even when it was clear these positions were largely rejected by Republican voters.

I suppose the answer might be found in the ancient wisdom of the advertising industry.  Because where advertising spending has its biggest effect is in places where the contest is between products that are so similar that only the advertising makes a difference.  That’s why some of the biggest expenditures on advertising throughout the years have been by companies making products that would be interchangeable under white labels.  For instance, Coke versus Pepsi.  One brand of cigarettes versus the other.  One brand of beer versus another.  Come to this casino rather than the other one.  On and on, but you get the point, I’m sure.

And as long as the Republican Party saw fit to offer voters that which was nothing more than a lighter version of the standard Democrat Party platform, one that was slightly slower and a bit more profitable, campaign cash mattered.  It was about presenting an image, a message, a product rather than a genuine alternative.  No longer.  It began with the Trump campaign, which was outspent by its competitors by unimaginable sums of money.  Let’s call it the Schaffley Rule: When voters are offered an echo, not a choice, money matters.  When voters are offered a choice not an echo, policy and politics matter.

But before we get too carried away with this grand notion that by electing President Trump we have now begun the long painful process back to normalcy, we need to keep in mind that, whether it’s for four years or eight, Donald Trump represents only a temporary shift back toward that universe where up is up and down is actually down.  And we need to keep in mind that it’s going to be up to us to make sure that we keep things moving in the direction that we started with President Trump.  And I would argue that we should have already begun the search for those candidates who will maintain that which was started with his election. 

That said, I must admit that last November 8th was, for me, just as it was I would imagine for many others, more than a little bit of a happy day.  After all, it did my heart good to see that monster in human form, Hitlery, get her teeth kicked in, politically speaking of course.  It was, without a doubt, one of the most satisfying experiences I think I have ever known.  What so many still don't get though, is that Obummer and Hitlery, and the entire Democrat/progressive cabal, made the classic mistake that all totalitarian, dictatorship minded organizations and individuals invariably make when they think they can't lose, they got over-confident.

I think it safe to say that Obummer, the man who still never tires of talking about himself and how great he is, went one radical, anarchist, socialist bridge too far and thought he was the chosen one, you know, he whom we had all been waiting for.  The one to whom nothing would be denied, the one who would finally be able to show us all the error of our ways.  He said we could go on spending money that we don’t have and it wouldn’t be a problem because all that money was being spent on a worthwhile cause.  But we’re learning that there needs to be a limit to our generosity, and a point at which folks need to become self-sufficient.  

It was back in November that I wondered aloud if we should actually send Obummer a thank you note for the great public service he did finally outing himself and his party.  And I made mention of the number of voices on the left that were then claiming how it was that Obummer’s first inauguration would be heralding in what was then thought to be 40 years of sold Democrat rule.  But it was in pretty short order that their dreams turned into what was little more than a nightmare as the Democrats lost first control of the U.S. House, then numerous governorships and state legislatures, then the U.S. Senate and then finally the presidency.   

And now, while there is nothing that would give me greater pleasure than to say ‘RINO Season’ has officially begun, I fear it’s way too early to make such a claim.  For many years Americans allowed their voices to be usurped by the big-money donors because the politicians were clever at bait-and-switch.  Until alternative media emerged to do the job no American journalist was willing to do (hold politicians accountable to the people), there was not enough information available to the voter to really identify the liars for what they were.  All has changed and to the benefit of the American citizen over big money interests.

In order for money alone to be sufficient to win elections, first and foremost the voters have to be made and kept clueless.  And it has been a coordinate effort between the Democrat and their media allies to keep voters in the dark.  But the voters now know who ‘The Establishment’ is. The lies and treason against the voters by the Republican establishment is fresh in the minds of the voters.  We still don't have ‘The Wall’ and Obamacare hasn't been repealed.  Even the attempts at repealing Obamacare allowed 90% of it intact.  So from here on out, no more lies and broken promises from the Republican establishment. Throw them all out!

ACCUSATIONS OF RACISM SO OVERUSED THEY’VE BECOME MEANINGLESS…

No offense here, but am I the only one who has come to the conclusion that a substantial number of blacks in this country have now lost their collective mind?  I mean this entitlement mentality, long encouraged by the Democrats, seems to have now metastasized into a condition that would seem to make many blacks think that they are somehow deserving of actually being above the law.  From the committing all manner of crime without fear of apprehension or prosecution, to looting and destroying private property almost at will and being allowed to take home whatever it is that they are able to steal, and even being permitted to kill police officers all because of some perceived injustice and without fear of confinement to prison.  Blacks have come to believe that society’s rules simply don’t apply to them.   

And it doesn’t help matters when we have black politicians who continue to actively encourage such behavior.  For instance, everyone’s favorite imbecile, Sheila Jackson Lee, recently decided to take a knee during a speech on the House floor, this past Monday, as a show of support for the thugs of the NFL who demonstrated this past weekend against President Trump.  It was during her idiotic remarks that this moron said, “There is no basis in the First Amendment that says that you cannot kneel before the national anthem or in front of the flag.” Jackson Lee, as you may recall, is a member of that rather odd assortment of racists referred to as the Congressional Black Caucus.  She took issue with a speech Trump gave on Friday in which he called on NFL owners to fire players who refused to stand for the national anthem.

And I’m sure by now everyone is aware of how dozens, if not more, of NFL players kneeled in response to President Trump’s remarks, and some teams, such as the Pittsburgh Steelers, largely refused to take the field during the playing of the national anthem.  And of course she made the claim that President Trump’s remarks were…’RACIST’.  Jackson Lee said, “There is no regulation that says that these young men cannot stand against the dishonoring of their mothers by you calling them ‘fire the son of a b.’ You tell me which of those children’s mothers is a son of a b. That is racism.  You cannot deny it. You cannot run for it, and I kneel in honor of them.”  And it was then that Ms. Jackson Lee took a knee behind the podium saying, “I kneel in front of the flag and on this floor.”  It was really all quite pathetic.

Race was never mentioned by President Trump during any of his comments and he has denied that his comments had anything to do with race.  He has said that he believes that professional athletes should honor the American flag and members of the military by standing during the national anthem.  Now how is it, exactly, that that can in any way be construed as being racist.  Granted, most of those involved in these ‘protests’ are black, but that has nothing to do with the president and everything to do with the protesters.  Also, someone really should inform Ms. Jackson Lee that the NFL rules do in fact state that ALL players will stand for the National Anthem.  And there is no asterisk that says blacks can be exempt if they happen to dislike the president.  So apparently, the race baiting Jackson Lee is dumber than her supporters.

And you know, I can only assume that there must be something in the water there in our nation’s capital and that it must be disproportionately effecting the black members of Congress.  Because now joining in with the esteemed Ms. Jackson Lee and all of her racist accusations are none other than her fellow members of that blatantly racist group, the “Congressional Black Caucus’.  These clowns recently got together and told the president to “stop acting like a child” in a Monday statement criticizing the president’s comments on protests of the national anthem.  Rep. Cedric Richmond, Democrat, criticized Trump for the way he referred to white nationalists at riots in Charlottesville, Va., as “very fine people,” but dared to refer to black athletes kneeling as “sons of bitches.”  Well you know, Cedric, if the shoe fits…

Richmond wrote in the statement released by this group: “I call again on President Trump to start acting like a president and to stop acting like a child.”  And he went onto say, “It is no surprise that athletes and others do not want to come to the White House when President Trump calls Black athletes who exercise their First Amendment right to free speech ‘a son of bitch’ and calls White men who yell racial epithets ‘very fine people.'”  And he added, “Perhaps President Trump did not notice that many of those White men were carrying the American flag.”  Richmond also called out NFL team owners’ statements for not mentioning that players were kneeling because of police brutality or for providing an explanation for why former San Francisco 49ers’ player Colin Kaepernick continues to be unemployed.

And it was Richmond who went on to say, “They are taking a knee to protest police officers who kill unarmed African Americans – men and women, adults and children, parents and grandparents – with impunity. They are taking a knee to protest a justice system that says that being Black is enough reason for a police officer to fear for his or her life.”  And he said, “The other thing that was missing from the statements I read was a logical explanation of why Mr. Kaepernick continues to be unemployed. He is not the first professional athlete to call attention to racial injustice and he will not be the last. But the reality is that he is being penalized for doing so.”  Look, the explanation regarding Kaepernick’s current employment situation is really a very simple one, he’s a shitty quarterback.  And who wants to hire a shitty quarterback?

And there’s that other racist loon, ‘Mad Maxine’ Waters who, come Hell or high water, has now made it her mission in life to make sure that President Trump is impeached.  During a recent weekend appearance on MS(LSD), Waters told host, and fellow racist, Joy Reid that Trump “is the most deplorable person I have ever met, seen or witnessed,” and that he should be impeached in part due to his response to the NFL players kneeling during the national anthem.  And it was in referring to the president’s call for a boycott of the league that ‘Mad Maxine’ said, “It is absolutely outrageous and dangerous what he’s doing.”  And then, bringing up former advisor Steve Bannon, Waters said, “He started dog-whistling to that constituency during the campaign and started his division.”  Waters has gone completely round the bend.

Sounding as if she has now come completely unhinged, Waters said, “They frighten people. They play into racism. They do what every other president either has attempted not to do, or at least showed some signs of, uh, you know, trying to bring people together, or not divide.”  ‘Mad Maxine’ chose not to denounce the divisive actions of these NFL players choosing to snub the American flag and national anthem.  Instead she remained focused on the president, saying “He is about division. He is about signaling to that core group of his that this country that he wants to make great again is all about making it white.”  ‘Mad Maxine’ asserted that Trump won’t criticize Vladimir Putin, but he’ll “criticize NFL players.”  And while clapping her hands, Waters said, “And we’ve got to get ready for impeachment.”

Democrats persist in their attempts to label President Trump and his core base of supporters as “racists”, “White Nationalist”, Nazis, you name it.  And it has pretty much blown up in their faces, and has essentially now come full circle back to their own history with regard to slavery, KKK as well as segregation and the American people know full well that the Democrats “go to” offense is always to accuse those who disagree with them of “racism”, “White Nationalism” or Nazis while purposely denying the existence of millions of Republican/Conservative minorities.  Most intelligent people are very well aware that it’s the Democrats and the “Fake News” outlets who are sowing the seeds of hate and discontent in their attempt to destabilize the U.S. and blame Trump in hopes of turning his base against him.

Unfortunately for Democrats, “Americans” significantly outnumber all of the hateful, vile and racist little groups combined and will not be goaded into participating in their protests, choosing sides, or taking up arms against each other as we remain united as “Americans” first and foremost.  But I’ve always been rather curious about just who is it that blacks think they’ll be able to convince “Americans” into believing that blacks are constantly being made to suffer all form of injustice especially when it’s become pretty common knowledge that blacks commit the majority of violent crime in this country, their preferred method of ‘protest’ is rioting and looting and they relish in their thuggishness and tend to go out of their way to intimidate those folks who want nothing more than to just get along.  

And look, no one is saying that you can’t protest (peacefully), just that there are going to be consequences for doing so.  President Trump speaks for us when he says these individuals should be fired.  We elected him to be our voice and that is exactly what he is doing. Jackson Lee is doing what her voters want her to do.  Which is of course to throw around all manner of accusations of racism against those who are guilty of nothing more than to disagree with her politically.  Hopefully her voters will soon decide supporting the U.S. and its flag and anthem is more important than trying to destroy a president.  But somehow I doubt it. There childish efforts to get their way, no matter what, is hurting the country and will only encourage Trump voters to be more vocal and to work even harder to “get out the vote.”

THE NFL AND ITS KNUCKLE-DRAGGING SNOWFLAKES…

We seem to have a growing number of these overpaid Neanderthals in the National Football League (NFL) who now think that it is become acceptable, and/or appropriate, for them to disrespect not only our flag but also the very country that has made it possible for them to become multi-millionaires while possessing little more than a degree in ‘basket-weaving’.  And they make all of this money not by making some grand contribution to humanity but, instead, for doing something as trivial, even silly, as playing a kid’s game.  And in an effort to point out just how ludicrous things have become let’s focus on just two teams, the Baltimore Ravens and the team that has been a long standing joke in the NFL, the Jacksonville Jaguars.   

So it was then that as recently as this past Sunday there were seventeen players from these two teams who decided to take a knee during the presentation of the national anthem, in London.  The combined salaries of these players is in the neighborhood of $450 Million.  You see, if we combine the total value of each player’s contract it adds up to a staggering $448,373,425, a figure greater than the gross domestic product of over a handful of the world’s nations.  According to ESPN there were ten Ravens’ players and roughly the same number of Jaguars’ players who took a knee during the national anthem at Wembley Stadium in London.  They seem to be of the opinion that they are deserving of respect but that our country and our flag are not.

The list of Ravens’ players included such men of questionable intelligence as: Terrell Suggs, C.J. Mosley, Za’Darius Smith, Tim Williams, Tyus Bowser, Mike Wallace, Carl Davis, Tony Jefferson, Anthony Levine, and Lardarius Webb.  And the list of those individuals on the Jaguars’ sideline who were of equal, or lesser, intelligence of their Ravens’ counterparts included: Jalen Ramsey, A.J. Bouye, Calais Campbell, Yannick Ngakoue, Malik Jackson, Tashaun Gipson, and Leonard Fournette.  These ‘men’, who were likely former juvenile delinquents, apparently chose kneeling as their preferred way of responding to recent comments from President Trump regarding the ongoing protests of the national anthem at various NFL games all across the country.

It was on Sunday morning that President Trump NFL said owners should either fire or suspend players who kneel during the national anthem, and fans should not keep watching games if players continue to protest. The president tweeted Sunday morning, “If NFL fans refuse to go to games until players stop disrespecting our Flag & Country, you will see change take place fast. Fire or suspend!”  The president’s comments come on the heels of an impassioned speech he gave in Huntsville, Alabama, Friday evening.  He came out swinging in his comments against NFL players who choose to kneel during the national anthem.  But the fate of these players is less in the hands of the owners than it is in the hands of those who pay to watch them.

It was while in Huntsville, Alabama on this past Friday that the president told those in attendance, “The only thing you could do better is if you see it, even if it’s one player, leave the stadium. I guarantee things will stop. Things will stop. Just pick up and leave. Pick up and leave. Not the same game anymore, anyway.” And he went on to say, “Wouldn’t you love to see one of these NFL owners, when somebody disrespects our flag, to say, ‘Get that son of a bitch off the field right now. Out. He’s fired. He’s fired!”  Now while I may not agree with the language that the president used I agree very much with the sentiment of his statement.  But the fate of the game should be left up to those who watch, because that will a much more lasting effect.

And riddle me this.  What do you suppose would happen to you if you were to go to your place of employment and proceed to do whatever it was that you wanted to do?  Would you get away with that?  Somehow, I very much doubt it!  It’s your employer who gets to set the rules and conditions of your employment.  It’s obvious that the owners who comprise this ‘National Felon League’ hate America, but they sure love all those dollars coughed up by the ‘fans’.  Interestingly, it was the owners who makeup NASCAR who had a different take.  They told their employees, do this and you will be on the next Greyhound bus.  But since I don’t recall any black NASCAR drivers, the chances of any protests arising in the first place are already pretty remote.

Look, millions of Americans go about their business every day and never disrespect a black person.  Many of these same people spend a disproportionate amount of money to watch their favorite NFL team.  Why should the fans be denied an afternoon of enjoyment by overpaid, spoiled athletes who can't get over the fact that Donald Trump won the election and is now president?  The fans have First Amendment rights too.  If any one of those fans went to work and “took a knee” when their boss asked them to perform their job, they would be fired on the spot!  I don't deny that these players should be able to peacefully show their displeasure, but there is a time and a place.  And it is not on the field while our National Anthem is being played.

These pampered billionaires are using the fame, bought and paid for by the American people, and a platform we have given them to shit all over our flag and our country.  The stench of entitlement and hypocrisy is so strong it permeates the entire country every Sunday.  And this is not a free speech issue either.  Even worse, disrespecting your country and flag and all those who have fought and died for what it represents by virtue signaling does not encourage debate on the issue, it is simply a divisive and corrosive act.  These “children” who kneel should try kneeling in church and thanking God that they were born in the USA.  Do they really think that if they had been born in any other country they would find themselves where they find themselves today? 

JOHN LEWIS, THE MOST VILE AND TOXIC KIND OF RACIST…

I cannot be the only person who sees it as being more than just a little sad, and on a number of levels, that we have a man today who has, over time, made the rather startling metamorphosis from civil rights ‘icon’ to being a man who is nothing more than the very worst kind of racist.  And he’s not your average run-of-the-mill racist either.  Not by any means.  He's fomented racial hatred nearly his entire life, and is more akin to a black bigot and opportunist than any kind of civil rights ‘icon.’

And the man of whom I speak would be none other than Georgia Democrat, John Lewis.  It was Mr. Lewis who claimed in a statement, just this past Thursday, that the election of President Donald Trump emboldened racists to “to put on those hoods, put on those sheets.”  Lewis said, “When we had this most recent election, it helped create the climate and environment to bring out something that had been a little asleep, and people feel like now they can just get away with doing everything.”

In what was nothing more than an attempt to slander the president, Lewis continued by saying, “What happened in Virginia made me very sad. We faced mobs, we faced the Klan, we faced overt, open racism during the ’60s. During the freedom rides in 1961, black people and white people couldn’t be seated together on a Greyhound bus, leaving Washington, D.C. to travel through the South. We were beaten, attempted to burn us on the bus, we were left bloody and unconscious by angry mobs.”

He said, “When we attempted to march from Selma to Montgomery just for the right to vote, to protest in a peaceful, orderly, non-violent fashion, we were beaten by the state police and left bloody and some unconscious, and some of our people died,” Lewis added. “After the march on Washington in 1963, there was so much hope and optimism, but 18 days later, a church was bombed in Birmingham, where four little girls were killed on a Sunday morning. What we see happening now, it’s not new.”

He added, “The man that some people voted for just made it very comfortable for people to put on those hoods, put on those sheets, and I tell you, if we’re not mindful or watchful, we are going to go back. We’ve come too far, made too much progress to go back. I don’t want to go back. I want to go forward, and we must go forward.”  He claims that he wants to go forward.  But he seems to have little or no interest in making things better for anyone but himself in the process.  He’s truly quite pathetic.    

For all his bloviating, what has this civil rights ‘icon’ done for his people of late.  How are blacks better off 50 years after the movement?  The poverty levels are higher, graduation rates are lower, incarceration rates are much higher, single parent households are more plentiful, and young black males are much more likely to die violently than see the age of 30.  So while the John Lewises of the world continue to preach the same old tired sermon, blacks in American make little forward progress.

And correct me, if I am wrong, but it would seem to me that the last time Lewis actually did anything FOR the black community was during his days with Dr. King.  And from where I’m sitting, he’s been willing to milk his status as a civil rights ‘icon’ for all he can get from it.  But, seriously, what has he done since?  I put him in the same category as the ‘reverend’ Jesse ‘The Extortionist’ Jackson and fellow ‘reverend’, Al ‘Not-So’ Sharpton.  Two who have done nothing but to put money in their pockets.

And lest we forget, it was this very same John Lewis, the notorious race-pimp, who accused members of the Tea Party of spitting on him and calling him the ‘N’ word as he strolled through the Congressional Plaza packed with thousands of Tea Party folks in 2010.  There’s just one thing, it never actually happened.  He was walking with the now convicted felon Jessie Jackson Jr., and fellow liar and racist Emanuel Cleaver, complete with cameras and recording devices, hoping to catch such an incident.

Despite those cameras, this trio of racists were never able produce a single frame of footage, or soundbite corroborating their incendiary accusations. Thousands of others had cameras too in the plaza that day, every step of the way.  Of course it was all a hoax because no footage ever emerged.  Nevertheless, the state-controlled media chose to run with this epic slander, never questioning the complete lack of ANY corroborating evidence.  The accusations were sufficient to run with the ‘story’.

And it seems that these days instead of actually doing something that will genuinely help those within the black community, people like Lewis prefer to blame all of the problems of blacks on white people because, quite frankly, Lewis and his fellow Democrats need to keep blacks poor and dependent on government.  Because they fear should the day ever come when blacks become self-sufficient they will no longer need government handouts, and will no longer feel compelled to vote for Democrats.

Men like Lewis don’t want blacks to feel like they should be accountable for their actions and to stop blaming others or to take the opportunity to address the real problem, themselves.  Looking inward and taking responsibility for ones owns actions is huge step in the right direction.  And as long as the so-called ‘leaders’ in the black community do not address the real problem, nothing will get better. I do agree it is up to each individual, especially when there does not seem to be many role models.

Because the old form of slavery was considered evil, LBJ and the Democrats figured out a better way, the generational welfare plantation.  And, if they played their cards right they would even be able to convince blacks to vote for keeping that plantation going!  We are now into 4th generation welfare in this country.  And it’s been along the way that blacks like Lewis, and a (whole) host of others, have aided and abetted the enslavement of their people in exchange for a seat at the Democrat Party table.

Sadly, the bottom line here is that it was Obummer himself who made it acceptable for blacks to riot!  To go rob, loot, destroy private property and to commit 90 percent of all violent crime in America and to shoot cops dead whenever cops try and police them.  And I think Obummer made it far more acceptable to scream racism every time the black man didn't get his way!  To the point where the term racist has now become so overused by blacks that it no longer has any sort of meaningful impact. 

No, Mr. Lewis, President Trump is not making it easier for the Klan.  On the contrary, it’s you who are doing the Klan’s work by encouraging your fellow blacks to call everything that is white, racist, overtly hating America, and blaming whites for all of the problems that blacks bring upon themselves.  All behavior that will serve only to further damage race relations in this country.  All this anti-white rhetoric is accomplishing nothing for blacks but the shooting of themselves in both feet.  

And if Lewis and the other supposed ‘leaders’ of the black community really wanted to help they would encourage young blacks to stay in school, to choose resume over rap sheet, and to prepare themselves for decent, good paying jobs.  Also, learning to speak Standard English would be a giant step in the right direction.  Also, it wouldn't hurt to call out your rappers for their hate filled, anti-white, anti-police rants.  And finally, if Lewis can call ME racist, I think it only fair that I return the ‘favor.’

OBAMA STILL SEES HIMSELF AS THE LEADER OF AMERICA…

If there is one thing that we learned over the course of that very dark span of time known as the Obama presidency, it’s that the man had a rather bizarre fondness for not only the sound of his voice, but also a level of pleasure that bordered on obsession when it came to the need to talk about himself.  And even after leaving office there still remains constant, in this ever changing universe, the need for this man to endlessly spew what is nothing more than toxic drivel while, at the same time, taking great pains to talk about little but himself.

And it would seem not to matter who it is that he may share the podium, or stage, with because, after all, HE is a former president.  Albeit the worst one we’ve had in modern times, but still a former president.  So even when appearing with someone who has been called ‘a revolutionary of modern society’, Barry Obummer still can’t help but to talk about himself.  A lot.  It was during an appearance at the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation “Goalkeepers” conference, that the former president referred to himself 42 times during his 18-minute remarks.

Obummer was so focused on himself that he couldn’t help but quote himself.  It was in praising the Gates’ action on ‘climate change’ that Obummer said, “We can figure it out. It can be done.  And that spirit, that spirit that says, to quote, I guess, myself, ‘Yes we can,'” triggered laughs and cheers from the crowd.  Obummer then went on a real stem winder of a response during a Q & A portion, and he wrapped it up by saying, “The last thing I’ll say so that I don’t sound like I’m still in the U.S. Senate and filibustering…” before offering a point, which he called a “profound one.”

While talking about his days in Chicago, Obummer recalled them in typical humble fashion.  He said, “My early work as a community organizer in Chicago taught me an incredible amount, but I didn’t set the world on fire.”  Obummer repeatedly talked about “my staff” and reminded the audience at least five times that he was president.  All told, he spoke of himself 96 times during the roughly 48-minute appearance.  He said “I” 78 times, and “me” or “my” 18 times.  It was not disclosed how much Obummer or his ‘foundation’ was paid for his appearance.

And it was during this same speech that the ex-president also took the opportunity to slam Republicans who are now trying to dismantle his signature ‘achievement’, Obamacare.  He argued that while the Affordable Care Act is “not perfect” and has “things that need to be fixed,” the Republicans are trying to “inflict real human suffering” with their efforts to reform or replace the law.  If we’re being honest, which Obummer never is, the true suffering came from passing this outright seizure of our healthcare by the Democrats for no other reason than because they could. 

The Republicans are currently trying to pass a version of health care reform by Senators Graham and Cassidy.  Obummer said, “When I see people trying to undo that hard-won progress for the 50th or 60th time with bills that would raise costs or reduce coverage… it is aggravating.”  And he said, “And all of this being done without any demonstrable economic or actuarial or plain common sense rationale. It frustrates.”  He asserted, “It’s certainly frustrating to have to mobilize every couple of months to keep our leaders from inflicting real human suffering on our constituents.”

So it would seem that the whole commander-in-chief gig is pretty difficult for Obummer to let go of.  It’s pretty obvious that he wasn’t ready to be a civilian again and to give up his title.  And he’s likely so desperate to hear those words that I wouldn’t be surprised if he made his family and staff call him that around the house.  Despite what he tells himself, his eight years in office resulted in more damage being done to this country than anyone could have possibly imagined.  And the Democrats can deny that until the cows come home, but it changes nothing.

As a direct result of Obummer’s policies we had: 1. The lowest labor participation since the 1970s, 2. Nearly 95 million Americans out of the labor force, 3. The worst economic recovery since the 1940s, 4. The lowest home ownership rate in 50 years, 5. Nearly 13 million more Americans on food stamps, 6. Over 43 million Americans living in poverty, 7. A median household income lower now than in the 1970s, 8. 1 in 5 families without someone in the workforce, 9. 1 in 6 men ages 18-24 are either incarcerated or out of the workforce, and 10. More debt than all other presidents combined.

But things don’t stop there because for blacks in America Barry’s economic policies have been responsible for a: 1. 58 percent increase in food stamps, 2. 20 percent jump in those out of the workforce, 3. Home ownership 20 percent lower than the national average, 4. Unemployment higher than the national average, 5. Racial wage gap the worst in nearly 40 years, 6. Median household income $20,000 lower than the national average, 7. Poverty rate 10 percent higher than national average.  And yet blacks still support him and for no other reason than he’s black.

TWO OF OUR WORST SECRETARIES OF STATE TAKE SHOTS AT THE PRESIDENT’S UN SPEECH…

Why is that we should be willing to take serious the critiques of President Trump’s recent address before the Unite Nations now being offered by two of the most incompetent individuals to ever hold the title of Secretary of State?  First it was Hitlery we heard from as she referred to the speech as being “very dark” and “dangerous” and then it was John Kerry-Heinz who said the speech didn't put America first, it instead put "America last.  Meanwhile it was Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu who assessed it as being the best speech he had heard given to that body in 30 years.  So who should we believe?  These two losers or the leader of a country? 

When it comes to those comments made by Hitlery, it was during her recent return to late night TV, when she appeared for the first time since the election on Tuesday.  She voiced her displeasure to “Late Show” host, and fellow Trump hater, Stephen Colbert, saying that President Trump's speech to the United Nations was both “very dark” and “dangerous.”  She said, “Not the kind of message that the leader of the greatest nation in the world should be delivering.”  Which begs the question, what does she, as a Democrat, know about being a leader?  Because when it comes to Democrats the primary focus must always be on appeasement never on strength.

Hitlery went on to say that it is in such speeches that, “you are both required to stand up for the values of what we believe in -- democracy and opportunity -- as a way to demonstrate clearly the United States remains to beacon that we want it to be.”  She said that the message also should be that “when you face dangerous situations, like what is happening in North Korea, to make it clear that your first approach should always be diplomatic.”  The thing is, Democrats are never willing to take the next step, and the only logical step, once diplomacy has been exhausted.  They simply make the claim that the objectives have been met and move on.

And apparently Hitlery also seemed to be none too happy to hear how President Trump made it very clear, and in no uncertain terms, that the United States would “totally destroy” North Korea if it is forced to defend itself or its allies in the face of a nuclear threat.  Nor was she pleased at how he chose to refer to North Korean ‘leader’, Kim Jong Un, as “Rocket Man.”  Because, as we all know, Hitlery’s idea of diplomacy, as it is with all Democrats, involves the United States essentially agreeing to be made subservient to every dictator and despot on the entire planet.  Which accomplishes nothing more than to make us even less safe here at home.

Which brings me to he who took the baton from Hitlery as Secretary of state, John Kerry-Heinz.  And as we all know, he was even more disturbingly unqualified to be Secretary of State than was Hitlery.  And it was Mr. Kerry-Heinz who did his best to make the argument that President Trump's “America First” speech to the United Nations did not put America first, all it did was to put “America last and diplomacy last.”  Which, I must admit, had me wondering if he had watched the same speech that I did.  Because from what I saw there was nothing about the speech that put either America, OR diplomacy, last.  America was first and foremost.

It was on MSNBC's “Morning Joe” that Kerry-Heinz described President Trump's strong language by saying, “It pushes people away, I mean, this childish kind of, the rhetoric.”  He said, “If name calling was going to solve this problem, Donald Trump would have already solved the problem.  So, that's not going to move anybody to do what you have to do.”  He went on to whine, “You have to ask yourself, is America safer because of ‘Rocket Man?’  Did we bring anybody to the table as a consequence of that language?  You don't give a speech at the United Nations to talk to your base.  You have plenty of opportunities to do that.”

What Kerry-Heinz refuses to do, as do all of those on the left, is to recognize the United Nations as being one of most corrupt and dysfunctional organizations on the planet.  Kerry-Heinz claimed that China would shut North Korea down in two days, “but it won't because it says it's afraid of the stability issues that would happen if Kim's regime collapses.”  But what’s truly at the heart of China’s reluctance to take any serious action is their fear that it might lead to a successful reunification, which in time could lead to the emergence of a new American-allied economic powerhouse, complete with U.S. military bases, right on China’s border.

Kerry-Heinz seemed to take offense regarding the claim that diplomacy has not worked with North Korea for the past two decades.  Furthermore, at least according to Kerry-Heinz, Trump does not need to “brandish” threats of destroying North Korea to make his point.  He said, “You don't have to brandish that every moment so that it's always the big stick and no talk, literally, softly or otherwise.”  And he went on to say, “You have got to have both. And there's no sense here of diplomatic initiative or effort by them to bring Russia or China to the table to do this.”  By all means, it’s always better to pussyfoot around such the issues, or to lead from behind.

Kerry-Heinz also lambasted Trump's call to end the nuclear deal with Iran, saying shredding the deal, which Kerry-Heinz helped broker, would endanger diplomatic efforts with North Korea.  It was on that topic that he said, “What does North Korea think, looking at the way he's talking about shredding a deal that was made?”  And added, “If that's the way America behaves in the world, throwing out something that works because you don't like it, but it works, you're actually inviting a much more active path.”  Regarding the deal with Iran, it doesn’t work, it never has.  And how many of those agreements made in the past with North Korea were kept?  None!

President Trump's call against the Paris climate agreement is also something that didn’t sit too well with Kerry-Heinz.  Kerry-Heinz, who has been a big proponent of first bogus ‘global warming’ and then just as bogus ‘climate change’ for decades said, “Almost 200 nations came together, and all of them agreed simultaneously not to accept the burden imposed by any other country.”  Kerry-Heinz said, “Donald Trump has not told the truth to the American people about this. The burden that we've accepted is one we defined. He doesn't have to pull out of Paris. He just has to change the targets.”  The entire ‘climate change’ theory is a scam and he knows it.

As is always the case with Democrats anytime the United States is facing a major security challenge, they can always be counted on to come together in a perverted attempt to divide our nation, politicize our nation's survival decisions, and rip away at our President.  Any decent person with even a hint of patriotism, as well as ounce of intelligence, would be trying to unify our country behind our President right now, and show solidarity, but not our twisted cadre of anti-America Democrats. We are supposed to be stupid and believe their words over their obvious treasonous deeds.  Together with their media allies they succeed in fooling almost half of the people.  

Hitlery should be ashamed to show her face in public talking about this issue. She was Secretary of State while Obummer dithered and failed to do anything to stop this and so many other despots and tyrants around the world, including Assad, the Iranian Mullahs, the Venezuelan dictator, and others.  I’ve been listening to Hitlery flap her mouth for decades and never heard her say anything.  This situation with North Korea is the direct result of attempts, going back to her husband, to kick the can down the road.  She had her opportunity to do something about it and did nothing but to leave it for the next guy to deal with.  Well, welcome to the end of the road, Hitlery. 

As for Kerry-Heinz, what can I say about this classless and unintelligent boob?  A guy who spent four long arduous months in Vietnam, garnered for himself a few medals, of which at least two were for self-inflicted ‘wounds’, and then came home to accuse his comrades of all manner of atrocities and of being followers of Genghis Khan.  After which he went onto become a worse secretary of state than he was a U.S. senator.  And what does it say about this country when we have had as your chief diplomats, first Hitlery and then Kerry-Heinz?  Does anyone actually think that there was a foreign leader anywhere who took either of these boobs seriously?  Doubtful!

HITLERY, A DANGER TO OUR DEMOCRACY???

Ya know, is it me or does it seem like she just doesn’t WANT to let it go and to simply move on with the rest of her life.  I mean have you ever seen anyone who seems to get such enjoyment out of constantly reminding people that she’s a loser.  She seems to relish her defeat as she ignores what we’re told is a growing number of pleas from many within her own party that she just let it go.  But when you stop to consider that it’s now become essentially her only means of remaining in the spotlight it begins to kind of make sense, in a weirdly Hitlery sort of way.  And I must say, that’s wanting attention pretty bad.   

And as word comes that, nearly a year after the election, she plans on challenging the results, apparently we could be stuck with her for a while.  In an interview with NPR’s Terry Gross on NPR’s “Fresh Air” this past Monday, failed presidential candidate Hitlery said she’s open to challenging the results of the 2016 election.  In a response to a question asking if she would “rule out questioning the legitimacy of this election, Hitlery said, “No, I wouldn’t rule it out.”  Hitlery stated that she believes the Russian government influenced the election in favor of Trump, and that this ‘could’ make the outcome illegitimate.

And it was everyone’s favorite loser who then went on to say, “[Trump knew] they were trying to do whatever they could to discredit me with emails, so there’s obviously a trail there… There’s no doubt they influenced the election: We now know more about how they did that.”  And she said, “[Trump knew] they were trying to do whatever they could to discredit me with emails, so there’s obviously a trail there… There’s no doubt they influenced the election: We now know more about how they did that.”  One thing we all now know for sure is that Obummer wiretapped Trump’s campaign!  But I digress.

Hitlery went on to add that she does not think there is a “mechanism” in place to officially overturn the election results.  She concluded by saying, “There are scholars, academics, who have arguments that [the election should be challenged], but I don’t think they’re on strong ground. But people are making those arguments. I just don’t think we have a mechanism.”  And it was in this same interview that Hitlery also said that the United States “should abolish the Electoral College.”  Remember how during the 2016 election, Hitlery referred to Trump’s comment that he may not accept the election results as “horrifying?”

Hitlery also attempted to suggest yet another rather conspiratorial possibility by drawing a rather long and tenuous line of connections.  Her theory seems to center around the fact that a court recently overturned the Kenyan election, which was a project of Cambridge Analytica, the data company owned by the Mercer family, which was instrumental in the Brexit vote.  A Brexit investigation is currently underway into “the use of data and the weaponization of information,” and Hitlery has therefore theorized that Mercer helped Donald Trump to steal the Presidency.  But as we know, Hitlery is a bit of a conspiracy nut.

And yet perhaps the most hilarious moment of the entire interview came when Hitlery painted herself as a paragon of political selflessness.  She said, “Let me just put it this way: if I had lost the popular vote but won the Electoral College and in my first day as president the intelligence community came to me and said, ‘The Russians influenced the election,’ I would've never stood for it. Even though it might've advantaged me, I would've said, ‘We've got to get to the bottom of this.’ I would've set up an independent commission with subpoena power and everything else.”  Anyone buying this shit is beyond ignorant.

Yup, she’s a regular beacon of integrity and honesty, folks; that’s the Hitlery we all came to know and then chose to reject last November.  Let’s face it, every person who voted for Hitlery owes this country a huge apology.  And it was this week that the entire nation got an ugly unvarnished picture of the corrupto-crat-grifter signing books for $300 a pop at Costco.  But I suppose there is no price that her very devoted fans wouldn’t pay.  Hell, for that price you could see a Broadway play!  And I thought I saw where she was signing books next to giant pallets of toilet paper.  If so, wouldn’t that be so very fitting?  

And as a side note, I’m sure most will remember how, in October 2016, Obummer stood in front of the press on the White House grounds and stated that it'd be impossible for Russia or any other country to hack and/or influence a U.S. election, and he advised Trump to fight harder for votes.  He said this, of course, when he, Hitlery, the Democrats and those in media were all so certain they were going to win.  But, Hitlery has been crying over spilled milk ever since.  She should accept the results of the election because she's a threat to our Democracy if she doesn't.  What's good for the goose, my friend.

Hitlery continues appears to be absolutely clueless to why it is that so many people have come to despise her.  Most people would be content to remain respectfully out of sight after experiencing such a humiliating defeat.  Not to mention the fact that it was on her watch that four Americans were brutally murdered because of her, including the first ambassador to be killed while serving his country since the days of Jimmy Carter.  And then there’s all of the corruption that has surrounded her for the last 25+ years, and still she has the guts to show her face in public?  It makes clear what can only be a very serious personality disorder.    

And finally, I just want to say thank you, Hitlery.  Your pain, disappointment and emotional breakdown, have brought me more joy, happiness, and comic relief than I would have ever thought possible.  I can only hope that you continue to write books full of the mindless tripe that so distinguishes you from rational thinking individuals, and that you do so until the time comes when you find yourself in that very warm and cramped corner for all of eternity.  And I have no doubt that when you walk through the gates of Hell you will likely be greeted by past associates who, like you, sought nothing more than to destroy this country for fun and profit.

FEW AMERICANS HAVE MUCH FAITH IN OUR EDUCATION SYSTEM…

Apparently, there is some new survey by Gallup that tells us pretty much what most of us already knew about our pathetic public school system.  And it shows how only 36% of Americans are confident in our public schools, which is the highest level of confidence since 2009.  2009?  Now let’s see, what happened that year?  Oh yeah, that’s right, that’s the year a devout Socialist became the 44th president of the United States.  Luckily my daughter, who graduated high school in 2011, came out relatively unscathed.  But that was only because her mother and I worked very hard to either undo, or to counter, all of the misinformation she was ’taught’ in school every day.  And believe me, it was no easy task.  And whenever I met with any of her teachers, the very first question that would always pop into head was, “How did you get this job?”  They always seemed to be in over their head. 

Anyway it was according to this most recent poll that only 36% of U.S. adults expressed a great deal or quite a lot of confidence in public schools and that is a six-percentage-point increase from 2016 and marks the highest confidence rating in eight years.  Gallup started this survey back in 1986 and the highest percentage of confidence since then was in 1987, at 50%.  It was in gathering information for the poll that Gallup asked, “Please tell me how much confidence you, yourself, have in each one [institution] -- a great deal, quite a lot, some or very little.”  For 2017, the "confidence" response was 36%.  So what we have is that roughly a third of the American adult population is able to trust that those involved in our public school system are actually interested in ‘teaching’ our children and not in ‘indoctrinating’ them.  That’s really pretty sad.  

And it’s by political party that the percentage of “great deal/quite a lot” of confidence in the government schools was 41% for Democrats and 30% for Republicans.  Which, for Democrats, is up from 36% last year and up from 21% for Republicans.  According to Gallup, “The boost in public school confidence this year is part of an uptick in the average confidence rating (35%) across all institutions that Gallup measures.”  The polling group went on to report, “Public school confidence ranked second in positive year-over-year change among 15 institutions tested in the June survey.”  And said, “Eleven institutions received a confidence boost from 2016, largely attributable to rising confidence among Republicans, which might be ascribed to the election of President Donald Trump.”  So by simply getting himself elected, Trump may have already had a positive impact.

In speaking for myself, I’m pretty darn confident in our public school system!  I am confident that the majority of teachers ‘teaching’ our children today come from the lowest ranks of college and university graduates.  I am confident that more money will be spent on trade unions and administrative costs than will ever be spent on actually educating our children.  I am confident that subjects like fuzzy math and ‘Common Core’ will greatly hinder the ability of our children to be successful in a global marketplace.  And I am confident that the average test scores and global comparisons have steadily diminished in the U.S. since the advent of the National Education Association and the Department of Education federalized the educational system.  The federal government should have no role to play in the education of our kids other than to mandate that it takes place.  

Frankly, I’m not the least bit surprised that people don't like what they are getting in return for the amount of taxpayer money we spend each year to ‘educate’ their children.  After all, we spend nearly $15,000 per student every single year, or roughly $650 Billion, and what exactly do we get in return?  Generation after generation of mind-numbed robots.  More people are going to have to get involved in their schools to make sure that the books that they pay for are accurately portray our history and that teachers are not teaching a bias toward the liberal world view.  It comes down to every community watching out for themselves if they want a good education for their children and not what the liberals want to stuff down their throats.  It's the only way that children, as they become responsible adults, will be able to elect responsible leaders who will “Make America Great Again.” 

U.S. students consistently fall well behind other international students in math and science proficiency.  And recent decades have shown that spending increasingly amounts of taxpayer money on public schools tends to have a poor return on the investment.  Betsy Devos cited lack of school choice and failure of top-down policies dictated by Washington.  She said, “This department just invested $7 billion trying to improve failing schools, and there were literally no results to show for it.”  And yet we are always told by those in the Democrat Party that, like everything else, all we need to do is to spend more money and things will improve.  Which begs the question, how much money is enough money?  Because I’m sure I don’t need to remind anyone that it’s that kind of mentality that has gotten to the point where this country is now $20 Trillion in debt.    

And let’s face it, it’s from the very first day they enter into their local public school to the day they graduate from one of our illustrious institutions of ‘higher learning’ that our children are ‘taught’ from a curriculum that consists of nothing more than leftwing propaganda.  It would seem that our ‘education’ system becomes more about indoctrination, and less about teaching our children, every single year.  I am 100% confident that the only thing schools are ‘good’ for is to turn our children into good little obedient communists, with all the moral values of alley cats in heat, holding their hands out to get everything they can for ‘free’.  I think most reasonably intelligent Americans will agree that U.S. public education HAS NOT been about ‘education’ for a very long time.  And that’s the problem.  We need to decide, as a nation, how best to actually educate our kids.

And Hitlery’s rather bizarre, and yet classically leftist, interpretation of George Orwell’s ‘1984’ notwithstanding, I think that it was he who said it best when he wrote, “Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past.”  Because what better way than through the controlling of our public, and to a certain degree our private, education system is there to accomplish just that?  If we are never ‘taught’ what our history is, and are instead ‘taught’ what is nothing more than a complete fabrication when it comes to our past, how is it that we can prevent making the same mistakes.  There’s an old adage that goes something like, “Those who do not learn history are doomed to repeat it.”  But if we’re never taught about our past, our future becomes far more uncertain.  We must be taught the mistakes, as well as the triumphs, of those who came before us.