Wednesday, October 12, 2016

“DEPLORABLES” AND “REDNECKS” UNITE…LET’S TAKE THIS CROOKED BITCH DOWN!!!


Well the Clinton clan has once again demonstrated its utter contempt for average everyday Americans.  First it was Hitlery who infamously described half of Trump’s supporters as a “deplorable” group of hateful bigots, and now her husband ‘Slick Willy’ has said that Trump supporters are “standard rednecks.”  The word redneck has obvious negative connotations, especially when bandied about by liberals, and ‘Slick’s’ use of the term was a clear dog whistle to Democrats. Trump’s base, ‘Slick’ is saying, is a bunch of ignorant, white racists.  And as despicable as they may be, ‘Slick’s’ comments are by no means surprising. 

‘Slick’s’ redneck remarks, while politically convenient in the short term, will likely prove to be, in the long term, divisive and dangerous.  Race relations in this country are worse than they’ve been in decades and society is so polarized, politically, that it often seems as if there are two entirely separate Americas trying to occupy the same country.  These wounds will likely continue to fester, and true bipartisanship will continue to be little more than a pipe dream, as long as liberals and progressives continue to portray all opposition to their ideological agenda as manifestations of ignorance and hate.

But for all but the most ignorant among us it has long been pretty clear the rather low opinion that ‘Slick Willy’ and wife ‘Hitlery’ have had of us average Americans.  So we shouldn’t be surprised how we have now been lumped into essentially two categories.  We’re either nothing more than a “basket of deplorables” and just a bunch of “rednecks”.  The primary focus all along of Hitlery’s campaign has been to dismiss and demonize Trump and his supporters as bigots.  So let’s all be proud, backwards, deplorable, and irredeemable rednecks and vote to make sure Hitlery never again sets foot in the White House!

Anyway, for those who missed it, Hitlery's full quote went like this:  “You know, to just be grossly generalistic, you could put half of Trump’s supporters into what I call the basket of deplorables. Right? The racist, sexist, homophobic, xenophobic, Islamophobic – you name it. And unfortunately there are people like that. And he has lifted them up. He has given voice to their websites that used to only have 11,000 people, now have 11 million. He tweets and retweets offensive, hateful, mean-spirited rhetoric.  Now some of those folks, they are irredeemable, but thankfully they are not America.”

And then it was at a recent campaign stop in Florida that old ‘Slick’ identified those of us who choose to support Trump as nothing more than "your standard rednecks."  He made his comments on Tuesday at a voters’ registration supporting Hitlery’s presidential campaign.  ‘The Slickmeister’ characterized us Trump supporters as part of the culture that he was raised up in while in Arkansas. ‘Slick’ was governor of the state before becoming president.  He said, “Look man, the other guy’s base is what I grew up in.”  And he went on to say, “You know, I’m basically your standard redneck.”

This is not the first time that ‘Slick’ has mocked Trump’s supporters. Last month at a rally in Pennsylvania, he joked about the "coal people" that support Trump in eastern Kentucky and West Virginia.  He said he was confused by those people because they used to support him.  He said, “They all voted for me. I won twice, and they did well, and they blame the president when the sun doesn’t come up in the morning now.”  Might the fact that Hitlery has threatened to put them ALL out of work have something to do with the fact that these “coal people”, or many of them, have chosen to support Trump?

Now imagine, just for a second, the level out outrage that would be directed at we Republicans if we dared to identify those who so enthusiastically Hitlery as being "wetbacks", "porch monkeys" or any other name that degrades an entire race of people?  Let's be clear here, calling white people who grow up on farms or in low income suburban areas populated by honest, hardworking people, and usually with a relatively low crime rate, "rednecks" is not only racist, it's degrading, stereotyping and demeaning, and it's completely wrong.  But I guess as long as it’s being directed at Trump supporters it’s ok.

But I gotta be honest, I would much rather be viewed as being your standard redneck than as a someone who: 1) Has been accusing of raping political associates, 2) has molested interns young enough to be my daughter, 3) Rented out the Lincoln Bedroom to political supporters as well as donors, or 4) is one of only two president ever to have been impeached.  Personally, I don’t know one redneck that’s ever been guilty of committing any of these activities.  And while Democrats can slam Trump for having a potty-mouth, it’s ok for Barry to flaunt, and pretty blatantly so, his ‘manhood’ to female reporters.

The fact is, the Democrat Party today has literally become the party of the lazy, the unformed and the ignorant.  It’s a party supported by leftist elites who profess themselves to be the only ones capable, or willing, of ‘taking care’ of the little people.  That would be those very same little people who, because of how they like all their ‘freebies’, always vote for Democrats.  And the same ones who have absolutely no clue what Socialism is like and who will be in for a very big shock when they find out that the Left’s utopia is nothing more than an illusion!!  They are the party of the haves and unfortunately we will be the have nots!!

Every hardworking American has long known what the Democrats think of us.  We're rednecks, uneducated, deplorables who insist upon clinging to our bibles and guns. We're xenophobic, racist and sexist.  Which begs the question, why it is that Hitlery so desperately wants to be President?  And yes, that’s a rhetorical question.  A big portion of Hitlery's base are the blacks, of which 85% never finished high school.  And in talking about the "uneducated" conservative voters, most of them DID graduate high school!  And since when does NOT having a college degree make it possible for one to be identified as being "uneducated"??

Anyway, it’s in closing that I thought I would take the opportunity to provide some level of clarity to what it is that’s often described as being ‘The Progressive Welfare Plantation’.  And in so doing I will take advantage of a survey that was conducted by the Maxwell Poll (Maxwell School of Syracuse University) on the political affiliation of those who receive government aid/benefits that makes it quite clear how it is that the Democrat Party uses our tax money to do little more than to purchase votes.  What’s listed are the specific ‘benefits’ and how voting patterns match up with those receiving those ‘benefits’:

Benefit                     Voting Democrat                  Voting Republican
Public Housing                  81.0%                                   12.0%
Medicaid                          74.0%                                    16.0%
Food Stamps                     67.0%                                    20.0%
Unemployment                 66.0%                                    21.0%
Disability (From Gov't)      64.0%                                    25.0%
Welfare/Public Assistance 63.0%                                    22.0%
                                                                            
The Curley Effect - Harvard University:  “As defined by Harvard scholars Edward L. Glaeser and Andrei Shleifer in a famous 2002 article, the Curley effect (named after its prototype, James Michael Curley, a four-time mayor of Boston in the first half of the 20th century) is a political strategy of “increasing the relative size of one’s political base through distortionary, wealth-reducing policies.”  Now, for all you uneducated “rednecks” I’ve included a translation which is as follows: A politician or a political party can achieve long-term dominance by tipping the balance of votes in their direction through the implementation of policies that strangle and stifle economic growth. Counter-intuitively, making a city poorer leads to political success for the engineers of that impoverishment”.

Much has been made about all of the so-called ‘Republicans’ who have, and very loudly so, either abandoned Trump, rescinded their endorsement of him or have been generally badmouthing him.  But little is ever said about who exactly these ‘Republicans’ really are, and there’s a reason for that.  Because most are ‘Establishment Republicans’, aka RINOs, who view a Trump presidency as being something that must be prevented at all costs.  These are RINOs who also have a nasty habit of referring to themselves as conservatives and who think that if they talk about Ronald Reagan we will view them as such.

These RINOs are also the very same ones who have spent much time talking about, over the course of the last six years, the need to reverse the leftist agenda of our current president, but have done absolutely nothing except to allow it to continue.  Therefore they view Trump as being a threat to the business as usual mentality that is rampant in Washington.  So if change is actually going to be brought about, the responsibility for making sure that happens is going to fall to we the people.  And there is but one surefire way to make sure that happens, and it’s by voting for Trump/Pence on November 8th!  

Tuesday, October 11, 2016

THE CRACK-UP OF GLENN BECK NOW APPEARS COMPLETE…


I remember the very first time I saw Mr. Beck on television. I was out with my wife and daughter at a local pizza joint and they happened to have CNN on their television.  And I remember thinking how odd it was to see someone who was so conservative on the Clinton News Network, it just seemed so unexpected which is likely why I remember it so clearly.  And it was shortly thereafter that he moved over to Fox News where I became pretty much of a regular viewer as well as a regular listener to his radio show.  But somewhere along the line things began to change, and not necessarily in a good way.  Mr. Beck left Fox News and would eventually set up his own network, ‘The Blaze’.  And it he slowly began to become a bit more extreme, even bizarre, in the things he was saying.

And it would appear Mr. Beck’s rather rapid descent into kookdom has continued pretty much unabated as he recently took to his Facebook page to urge what can only be his dwindling number of followers to abandon support of Trump, going so far as to actually declare that if such an action results in the election of Hitlery, “so be it” because “[a]t least it is a moral, ethical choice.”  Now I’m sorry but I see nothing that could be defined as being either moral or ethical about electing she who is the most corrupt individual in American politics today, to the highest office in the land.  To voluntarily take part in such an insane act of self-destruction seems absolutely ludicrous to me.   His call to do so provides further proof to me that Mr. Beck has become more that a little unhinged. 

Beck’s latest missive was apparently in response to the release of an 11-year-old hot-mic tape of Trump saying some rather lewd things about women.  Beck wrote, “If the consequence of standing against Trump and for principles is indeed the election of Hillary Clinton, so be it. At least it is a moral, ethical choice.”  Look, while I am not going to attempt to defend anything of what Trump said, how is it that those words can be said to compare to Hitlery’s act of standing idly by while four Americans, including one of our ambassadors, were brutally murdered in cold blood, or her blatant slandering of those women who were made to suffer at the hands of her sexual predator of a husband.  I simply don’t understand Mr. Beck’s rationale, nor his logic, in taking such a stand.  It makes no sense to me.

Anyway, the following is Beck’s complete Facebook post:

“Every person, each of us must decide what is a bridge too far.  Mike Lee has obviously reached that point, where the moral compromise his party is asking him to make is simply beyond what is acceptable.  It is not acceptable to ask a moral, dignified man to cast his vote to help elect an immoral man who is absent decency or dignity.  If the consequence of standing against Trump and for principles is indeed the election of Hillary Clinton, so be it. At least it is a moral, ethical choice. If she is elected, the world does not end….

Once elected, Hillary can be fought. Her tactics are blatant and juvenile, and battling her by means of political and procedural maneuvering or through the media, through public marches and online articles, all of that will be moral, worthy of man of principal [sic].  Her nominees can be blocked, her proposed laws voted down. 

The alternative does not offer a moral person the same opportunity. If one helps to elect an immoral man to the highest office, then one is merely validating his immorality, lewdness, and depravity.  But it’s OK, at least it is not her! Right??  No.  Lee’s call for Trump to step down and withdraw from the race is respectful to him and to the process. Trump stepping down does not guarantee a Clinton win, but it does guarantee that the Republican party still stands for something, still allows its members to maintain their [sic] own self-respect and that it still has a future.”

Mr. Beck declares that with the election of Hitlery the world will not end.  And I would agree, at least not right away.  But how many of our freedoms will simply be made to disappear?  And haven’t we witnessed enough over the course of the last six years that when it comes to control of Congress there is very little difference whether the Republicans or the Democrats are in control?  And I would argue, as I have before, that if the Republicans had kept even half of the many promises they made during the campaigns of 2010, 2012 and again in 2014 when the American people handed to them first control of the House and then the Senate, Donald Trump would not now be standing as the Republican nominee for president in 2016.  Trump is the creation of the Republican Party because of its failure to act. 

And truthfully, Mr. Beck is at best naïve, or at worst a complete imbecile, if he actually thinks our congressional Republicans would ever actually take part in any political or procedural maneuvering the specific purpose of which would be to hinder, what would obviously be, Hitlery’s destructive agenda.  And he’s beyond naïve if he thinks that those in the state-controlled media would ever be willing to play the part of accomplice in stopping she who they will have been responsible for getting elected in the first place.  Let’s face it, Hitlery would be stopped by the Republicans in much the same way that they have stopped Barry “Almighty”.  In other words, not stopped at all!  So I’m not sure why it is that Mr. Beck is of the opinion that her nominees would be blocked or her proposed laws would be voted down.

Mr. Beck’s continued opposition to Trump has been unrivaled in its vociferous invective. The radio talker regularly describes Trump as a Hitler-like psychopath with supporters that Beck has compared to Nazi Brownshirts.  The former radio talk show host’s disdain for Trump reached a crescendo in April when he donned swim goggles and rubbed his face in a bowl of crushed Cheetos to see if he could “look like Donald Trump.”  And you know, in so doing Mr. Beck is really choosing to mock, or even slander, those of us who see Trump as being a far better option as president than is Hitlery.  Just the thought of Hitlery becoming president is something that quite literally scares me to death.  America, at least as we know it, would never survive such a cataclysmic event, politically speaking. 

THE STATE OF THIS ELECTION…


What follows here is a piece that I think sums up rather nicely the scenario the American people are faced with this presidential election year.  I wish I could take credit for composing it, but I can't. The man responsible for that is Dr. Marc G. Kaprow.

“There is clearly a quandary for American voters this year.

In one corner we have a man who is highly offensive - to many of us. He is neither polished nor humble. He is the most unpolitical politician on the planet.  Some of his supporters are racist. We hear repeatedly about statements he made 15-20 years ago about women. We hear conjecture that he evades taxes through the use of loopholes.

We also hear stories that when he came to Mira Lago in Florida he fought for the right for Jews, blacks and women to have membership there. We hear stories of the jobs he has created, the kind messages he has delivered to employees and others who fell ill, and the fact that his children and family support him.  We watched him on television donating thousands of dollars to charities and inspiring other celebrities to compete, raising millions more.

We also know that he is not beholden to the media. He tells off reporters as fast as he does anyone else. He is not beholden to lobbyists - he is funding most of his campaign from his pocket. He spends conservatively - not because he has to, but because he can.
He is a progressive for many things - from paying women in his companies equally to his friendships with people of all creeds and colors. He is motivated by his patriotism - he already has money and power - what other motive is there for a President?  He doesn't have religious hang ups. His children were raised Christian and at least one has converted to Judaism - and she and her husband remain steadfast champions and advisers for him.

The other major candidate is a political veteran. She has been in politics for 30 years, and leveraged that position to make hundreds of millions of dollars peddling influence.  Like many politicians, her views shift with public opinion. In the Senate, she supported securing our borders and building a wall, she referred to black teenagers as super predators and she voted to invade Iraq.

She supported groups like the Islamic Brotherhood, and stood up for men like Abbas who funneled aid for his people into terror tunnels used to kill "enemies".  She overthrew a government in Libya and left an Ambassador and three other Americans to die by withholding help. She then, days later, lied to the families of those men as to how and why they died.

She broke the law to hide her communications from inspection and inadvertently (if you believe the FBI) or intentionally directed secret information that was ultimately intercepted by our enemies, and likely resulted in the deaths of key assets in the Middle East. She cut deals with charitable donors and spent much of those monies on administrative costs - and to cover it, she and Bill allied with a charity watchdog for years and then used influence to have themselves removed from a watchlist when their schemes were realized.

The DNC collaborated on her behalf to disenfranchise millions of voters who wanted her out. Her national campaign manager stepped down as a result.  Even as she blames her opponents for positions they take, she is unable to speak about how she has done anything of significant benefit to anyone in her decades of public life. She also uses the same tax loopholes that her opponent does.

Unlike her opponent she relies on the gifts of others for her campaign and she knows the quid pro quo game of politics well. She is indebted to the drug companies, the media companies, the finance and banking companies and countries from around the world.  She and her staff originate stories and controversies, like the picture of our current president in a turban, yet berates Trump for believing that.

She thinks that people should be treated differently because of the color of their skin, or because of their religion rather than basing judgement on people's actions. She supports criminals over law enforcement and contemplates using tragedies to leverage campaigning, by ordering commercial time on the Weather Channel during a hurricane and cancelling it when she is criticized. She is the uber politician - one who will say or do anything to be a success.

There are alternatives, like the candidate who has such dark blinders on it is like the world outside of his personal sphere he cannot name a single current world leader. There is another candidate who committed an act of vandalism and was arrested.  They are truly not worth the effort to explain.

Americans are faced with a choice - participate or not. Those who participate must decide - the bitter lying woman who is above the law or the egocentric man who is callous and uncouth.

I have three daughters - and I want them to know they can be president someday, but I also want them to understand that men and women can be jerks. Being a jerk doesn't disqualify someone for being a candidate - but in either case we are going to get a president who either says things not to be believed or one who is not to be believed that these things were said.

Ultimately I've made my choice - and it stems from three things:

1.  I cannot abide someone who has worked so hard to be "ideal" that she would be willing to break laws, disenfranchise Americans and collaborate with terrorists - both foreign and domestic either out of ignorance or worse yet, out of cunning to achieve money or power.

2. I am disgusted by politics in general. Yes I know several politicians and I even like a few. I detest that the primary motivation for an elected official is determining how to get re-elected, or if ineligible for re-election, how to create an indelible mark on the pages of history - regardless of the costs (financial and real).  I see a candidate who is beholden to no one and who will call out the politicians who have no allegiance without cash to support it.

3.  I cannot abide the direction our country is going. Anti Semitic acts are up. Race riots are happening. There is a war on police. There is a war on anyone who's grass is greener. We are breeding a generation of faithless plebes who haven't enough self confidence to be picked on or knocked down and who stand very little hope of becoming independent functional members of our communities and our society.

I do not like what Trump has said about women, but I am not naive enough to believe that (1) it is relevant 15 years later to the Presidency, (2) that my daughters should think that there will never be sexism or objectification of women, and (3) that it is routine to dig this far and deep to examine a candidate. I recognize that politicians and industries that depend on the political machine want nothing to do with Trump - not because he will bust unions, disenfranchise women, mock minorities or put up a wall - but because without a President dependent on their lobbying dollars the lobbyists lose their influence.  I can live with that.”

Monday, October 10, 2016

AND NOW MORE FROM THAT BASTION OF LEFTWING LUNACY KNOWN AS HOLLYWEIRD…


I always have to laugh whenever I hear some Hollyweird loser, like old Bobby DeNiro, spouting off as if there is even one reasonably intelligent person who actually gives a squat about what they have to say, and on any subject.  And it would seem that with the rise of Donald Trump the volume of weirdos who are now emerging from the woodwork has taken a serious uptick as it’s nearly every day now that yet another Hollyweird kook has something to say about either the possibility of Trump becoming the next president, or about those of us who support him, or both.  The most recent example of this comes from the obviously senile Bobby DeNiro who, courtesy of an insult-laden tirade, which would seem to have been written for one of his tough-guy movie characters.  Bobby unloaded a full minute of invectives directed at Trump in a video that was, I can only assume, designed to get people to the polls this November. 

As reported by The Hill, Bobby appeared in a video produced by ‘Anonymous Content’ and directed by fellow leftwing loon, Tom McCarthy, as part of an ongoing series of short interviews called #VoteYourFuture.  Bobby begins his rather sophomoric little tirade by saying, "[Trump is] so blatantly stupid."  And it’s then that things a little nutty as bobby goes on to say,  "He's a punk, he's a dog, he's a pig, he's a con, bullshit artist, a mutt who doesn't know what he's talking about... He's an idiot. Colin Powell said it best: he's a national disaster, he's an embarrassment to this country. It makes me so angry that this country has gotten to this point that this fool, this bozo, has wound up where he has. He talks how he'd like to punch people in the face? Well, I'd like to punch him in the face.”  And he concludes his imbecilic tantrum by saying, "If you care about your future, vote for it."  And that’s just what those of us voting for Trump will be doing!

Now here’s a guy, Bobby D., who is about as far removed from an intelligent human being as you can get.  After all, he’s an actor, and we all know just how little smarts that takes.  In his youth Bobby attended the private McBurney School and later attended the private Rhodes Preparatory School, but the thing is he never actually graduated from either.   Bobby is said to have hung out with a group of ‘street kids’ in his younger days there in Little Italy.  Bobby would go on to drop out of high school at age 16 in order to pursue an acting career.  So I guess I’m more than a little confused when it comes to what it is that makes him think that your average American would bother to pay any attention to anything he might have to say.   But apparently washed up-old-has been-Bobby thinks he's still playing Travis Bickle.  So go ahead try it Bobby, Donald carries.  Do we really need any further proof that leftists are pretty seriously brain-damaged?

So as is usually the case with those who reside in the outer reaches of the leftwing universe, what we have here is another liberal who's apparently thinks he’s presenting a cogent argument through well-reasoned debate.  I especially like how Bobby manages, in a single rant, to display every characteristic he's criticizes Trump for right down to, "He says he'd like to punch people in the face."  Bobby says, "I want to punch him the face."  Which, I guess, is ok to say if you’re a Hollyweird celebrity.  Liberals, like Bobby, are such hypocrites.  If Trump were to behave exactly as he did, but also gave lots of money to Democrats and toed the progressive line, they'd celebrate him rather than attack him. Trump's biggest crime isn't his words or attitudes, it’s the fact that he’s running as a Republican and refusing to be cowed by the bullies on the left.  It absolutely enrages them that anyone would dare to do so and these crazy meltdowns are the response.

And while Bobby sees fit to go off on Trump it’s at the same time that he doesn't appear to give a rat's ass about the laundry list of crimes committed by the Clinton Crime Family.  Come on, Bobby, you hypocritical piece of dog squeeze!  Bobby appears to be much more concerned about what Trump said to another guy 11 years ago than the fact that Hitlery exposed our nation’s secrets to our enemies or that she essentially stood by while four Americans, one of which was our ambassador, were murdered in cold blood.  This whole election has been rigged to favor Hitlery, and Bobby’s idiotic little rant is just one small part of it.  Message to Bobby Boy: You think you're angry?  You think YOU’RE angry?  Multiply that by 1000, you scumbag, and you'll have a just a smidgen of an idea how angry we conservatives are for what you vile, toxic, malignant big government liberals have done to this once great nation over the last 80+ years.

Thursday, October 6, 2016

SMALL BUSINESS OWNERS AND THE 2016 ELECTION…


While it is yet to be determined regarding how our two presidential candidates will fare in the next debate, in the eyes of at least one key voter constituency, the small-business owner sector, there is little doubt about who won the first one.  And it’s that group which is composed of 28 million small business owners and that is a major voting block in the upcoming election.  And if the last presidential debate is any guide, the Republican ticket would seem to have the advantage.  According to an exclusive nationwide poll with Manta, a social network for small businesses, Trump won the first debate in the eyes of small businesses on Main Street USA.  Mantra conducted a nationwide poll surveying 834 business owners from 26 to 28 September.  The poll found 58.7 percent of participants thought Trump won the first presidential debate while 41.3 percent said they thought that Hitlery won.

And something that I would think could be filed under the heading of “No Brainer” is the fact that this same poll of small business owners also found that they seem to prefer Donald Trump over his Democrat opponent, Hitlery, to be our next president.  The poll asked these small business owners which candidate’s tax policy they found to be the most favorable to them.  And it was 61 percent who said they thought Trump’s tax plan was the most favorable, while just 38.8 percent favored Hitlery’s tax policy.  I find myself wondering why it was that only 61 percent favored Trump’s policies especially when you consider how Hitlery possesses the same "you didn't build that" mentality as Barry does.  Do they want to have their businesses taken away?  Or to be taxed into bankruptcy?  Or to be socially engineered or told whom to hire, how much to pay them, and what benefits must be provided?  Just sayin’.

Again it was nearly 60 percent of those surveyed who said that they plan to vote for Trump, while roughly 40 percent said they plan to vote for Hitlery.  Now for the life of me I just don’t understand why it is that anyone who owns a small business would ever consider voting for any Democrat, especially one who is as anti-small business as Hitlery is.  I can only assume that those who have actually admitted that they intend to vote for her must have some sort of ulterior motive for doing so.  Mantra’s CEO John Swanciger said that small business owners are “highly invested” in the election.  He said, “This year alone, we’ve seen updates to the minimum wage, overtime regulations, and continuing healthcare policy changes. With such important issues on the line, we’ll likely see more small business owners tuning into the debates and showing up to polls come Nov. 8.”

The also poll revealed that top concerns for small-business owners in order of priority.   They are access to capital, hiring, religious freedom, foreign policy, immigration, health care and taxes.  Almost 80 percent said raising capital was their number 1 concern, while 77.5 percent said it was religious freedom, making it number 2.  Getting a pulse reading on small business and the election is key. The sector is a key contributor and the primary driver of the U.S. economy. The nation's 28 million small businesses represent 54 percent of all U.S. sales and have provided 55 percent of all jobs since the 1970s, according to the Small Business Administration.  Their vote can be a big swing factor in the election, considering a stunning 60 percent voted in their state primaries and caucuses and should be casting their ballots in November.

At this point in the contest it appears that 70% of working class Americans intend to vote for Trump.  Also, as things stand right now, Trump also has in his corner 65% of men, 15% of blacks, 88% of Republicans and a majority of both the military and law enforcement.  The only reason that this election remains a close race is because 100% of all the ultra-ignorant people are for Hitlery.  This includes 100% of all social parasites, 100% of all secular progressives, 100% of all BLM domestic terrorists, 100% of all anti-White and anti-Christian bigots, 100% of all social justice fascists, 100% of all man made global warming morons, 100% of all pro-abortion baby killers, 100% of all anti-American citizens, 100% of all gun grabbers, 100% of all leftists, which includes progressives, Marxists, socialists, communists of all other flavors and anti-American anarchists, 100% of the D.C. establishment and 100% of all globalists.

And then there are all those people who are so easily swayed by peer pressure and public opinion that also need to be factored in.  After Barry's election and re-election, I will never again underestimate the level of stupidity of the average American voter.  And let’s not forget that hundreds of thousands, or perhaps even millions, of votes will be cast for Hitlery by those in our Democrat controlled inner cities.  Those vast cesspools of ignorance and corruption where ballots are often forged, the dead are encouraged to vote, illegal immigrants are allowed to vote, and where folks are told to vote early and often.  It's a built-in advantage always enjoyed by Democrats and something always exploited and frequently used to win those close elections.  And there is very little interest in the state-controlled media to combat voter fraud because it’s seen as being such a good friend of Democrats, and Hitlery in particular.

So those of us who wish to prevent the complete takeover of this country by the left, which is virtually guaranteed by a Hitlery victory, will need to marshal our forces as never before.  We must work harder, as well as smarter, than ever before to insure the defeat all those who are the enemies of freedom.  This is our time.  Because if we lose this battle because we did not do everything in our power to win, how will we then be able answer our children when they ask us what we did to safeguard their freedoms?  We must be able to tell them that we did all that we could.  So volunteer for phone banks, to drive people to the polls, to canvas neighborhoods, to put up yard signs, even put more money into our campaign than you perhaps normally would.  And do all that you can to talk up Trump to those who are undecided or may be wavering.  Because I have no doubt that this is the very last chance we that will have!

Wednesday, October 5, 2016

MOOCHELLE OBUMMER, “WE NEED SOMEONE WHO’S HONEST AND PLAYS BY THE RULES” AS PRESIDENT…


It was at a Hitlery campaign rally Tuesday in Charlotte, North Carolina, that Moochelle Obummer, queen of the high dollar vacations, delivered a rather fiery little speech, taking direct aim at Hitlery’s opponent, Donald Trump.  And in her effort to tout Hitlery as being the ideal replacement for Barry, Moochelle said, “We need someone who’s honest and plays by the rules.”  Now how stupid must one be to believe that Hitlery is someone who is either honest and/or someone who plays by the rules?  Or do you simply need to be woman so infatuated with the notion of having a woman president that you ignore the fact that Hitlery is neither?

It was at this event, which was described as being one targeted primarily at younger voters, that Moochelle warned against those thinking of casting protest votes, saying “don’t play with that.”   Her message was one that warned that a vote for anyone other than Hitlery would be a vote ‘for’ Hitlery’s opponent. To further stress how just important each vote is, Moochelle highlighted how, in 2008, her husband won by only an average of two votes per precincts in North Carolina. In addition to warning people not to stay home because they are frustrated, Moochelle relentlessly pounded the young audience to make sure they are registered to vote.

Throughout her rather rambling speech, Moochelle never actually mentioned Trump by name, but made it abundantly clear who her jabs were directed at.  She repeatedly attacked Trump’s ability to lead due to his lack of experience, maturity, temperament, and consistency, stating that the long election process is a way for voters to get to know the candidates.  Moochelle warned that they will not change once they become president.  But what experience Hitlery does possess is not exactly experience at doing those things that would ultimately come to improve the lives of average Americans.  She is skilled only at making things worse.

Moochelle repeatedly referred to Hitlery as being the most qualified person to ever run for president, more so than even ‘Slick Willy’ and Barry “Almighty”.  And she proclaimed that Hitlery knows what it takes to be president and the responsibility that comes along with the job.  In one direct jab, Moochelle stated that a president does not cry foul as she began to tap her microphone and smile, referring to the microphone troubles that Trump had during the first debate. This technical problem was first played off as Trump “crying foul,” but was ultimately proven to be true.  Something Moochelle chose to simply ignore during her attempt to sell Hitlery.

Someone should take the time to remind Moochelle that a president also doesn’t blame all of her troubles, as well as her husband’s numerous, and well publicized, sexual indiscretions, on some fictitious entity that she likes to refer to as some “vast right wing conspiracy”, and failing to take any responsibility for her own behavior and excusing her husband’s.  Nor does a president blame his predecessor for what is his complete lack of leadership.  The fact that Barry is responsible for the most anemic economic ‘recovery’ since the 40’s has had nothing whatsoever to do with his predecessor.  Especially when that predecessor left office eight years ago. 

Moochelle also took the opportunity to attack Trump on the birther issue, claiming that her husband was indeed born in this country and the hurtful, deceitful claims were only used as a way to undermine his presidency.  Now of course what she very conveniently left out of her appeal to these younger voters is the fact that it was Hitlery who, back in 2007, first raised the entire birther issue.  Moochelle went on to say that the damage caused could not be undone by an insincere statement at a press conference, but I guess a simple denial from Hitlery was more than sufficient to wipe the slate clean as far as the entire birther issue was concerned.

Now you would think that because Moochelle is calling for the next president to be someone “who is honest and plays by the rules” that such a demand would seem to eliminate any possibility there might be that she’s actually campaigning for Hitlery.  But apparently such is not the case.  And I can’t help but wonder if, by making such a statement, she means to imply that perhaps the president who we have had in office for the last eight years, her husband, is actually someone who is neither honest nor someone who plays by the rules.  Although most of us here on the outside looking in view him as being little more than your average pathological liar. 

Let’s face it, the audacity of these blatant criminals is off the charts.  Hitlery has whored out every single principle she had for money and power.  She stuck with a rapist and threatened his accusers just to have a shot at the White House.  Her own Secret Service agent wrote a book about how nasty and rude and violent she was as First Lady.  Hillary set up an illegal email server, allowing our enemies to read our national security secrets, and then uses Barry to control the FBI and prevent prosecution.  Hitlery is the lowest life form in America, and I pray every day voters will pick Trump and let a real Attorney General finally clean house!!!!

So anyway, here have our ‘first lady’, or she who is quite literally an embarrassment to every first lady who has come before her, who would likely be one of the first to raise her hand when asked the question, "Who hates America?"  Which is more than a little ironic because, like most mentally challenged individuals of her political persuasion, in what other country is it that any of these people would ever be able to achieve the level of stature that they have but here in America?  And yet, like all of these imbecilic athletes kneeling during the anthem, all they do is bad mouth the country that has made it possible for them to achieve so much.   

And let’s not forget how it was back in 2008 and how it took her husband running for president for her to say, “let me tell you something -- for the first time in my adult lifetime, I am really proud of my country. And not just because Barack has done well, but because I think people are hungry for change. And I have been desperate to see our country moving in that direction and just not feeling so alone in my frustration and disappointment. I've seen people who are hungry to be unified around some basic common issues, and it's made me proud."  Just let me say, we are in no way proud of her!  She, as well as her husband, could have been so much more.

Because like your husband, who wouldn't know the truth if it bit him in the ass, she too has difficulty when it comes to telling the truth.  And I’m never sure what, or who, our president hates more, white people or America itself.  Because here we have a guy who takes every opportunity to bypass Congress and who has essentially styled himself to be a dictator. A guy who goes after his political enemies with the IRS and who lied about Obamacare and utterly ruined the job market because of it.  So I guess I would ask Moochelle is this what she means by having as our president someone who is honest and plays by the rules?  I’d really like to know. 

Because, let’s be honest here. Hitlery and Barry are two of the biggest crooks to have ever served in public office, at any level.  And it should come as no surprise that they are both Democrats, and as such see themselves as being above the law.  And the fact that they are able to continue to get away with their illegal activities is because so many of our supposed journalists in our state-controlled media simply don’t care.  So that means it’s going to be up to those who love our country to take them to task.  My only hope is that there are still enough people able to recognize what a threat to our freedom it is that Hitlery so very clearly represents.  She must not win in November.  

Tuesday, October 4, 2016

‘SLICK WILLY’ CLINTON…GOES ON THE STUMP FOR HITLERY…


It was while out stumping for his ‘wife’ in Saginaw, Michigan this past Monday that ‘Slick Willy’ Clinton, one of only two American presidents ever to have been impeached, took it upon himself to disparage as best he could those of us who have chosen to support Donald Trump in his effort to defeat Hitlery when it comes to choosing who it will be that replaces Barry “Almighty.”  And old ‘Slick’ actually went so far as to paint us all as being people blinded by “resentment” and “fear.”  The old ‘Slickmeister’ said, “When I saw Hillary in that debate…every American who watched it, unless they were just so knotted up with anger and resentment” saw a clear contrast in the candidates’ experience.  The alleged rapist went on to say, “If you’re mad then it doesn’t matter.”

And in using much the same tone as Barry once used in describing those bitter clingers who cling to their religion and their guns, ‘Slick’ went on to mock those ‘angry Americans’.  And in doing what I guess was his best impersonation of them, he said, “I’m mad about immigration, I’m mad about trade, I’m mad because my wages aren’t going up.”  And he went on to do his best in an effort to paint the divide in the country as a battle between “the voters of Hope vs. the voters of fear.”  He said, “Most of the anti-immigration feeling in America is in places that don’t have a lot of immigrants. We’ve got to stop fighting over this.”   He noted that the election should not be about “insults, tax evasion, abuse of the family foundation or whatever” because that’s not what matters to regular people.

Isn’t it ironic that here we have one of the skilled practitioners of that most toxic of political tactics, the politics of personal destruction, whining about Trump’s insults and accusations regarding Clinton’s foundation as being little more than a slush fund.  Let’s be honest here, shall we, there is no one who practices the dark arts of personal destruction quite like the Clintons.  One could go so far as to say that Hitlery has actually perfected the procedure.  The politics of personal destruction as we know, is a liberal tactic of demonizing the opposition.  And while the term was made popular by ‘Slick’ during his impeachment trial in the 1990s, the tactic was first employed by Teddy ‘The Drunk’ Kennedy during the 1987 confirmation hearings of Robert Bork when he was nominated to fill a vacancy on the Supreme Court.

‘Slick’ said, “The Democrats have a pretty good argument. I made it four years ago for President Obama.”  And he went on to say, “Is this a change election? Yes it is, and it should be.  But the question should be: what are we going to do?  What kind of change do you need?…Do we want anger or answers?  Do we want resentment or empowerment? And do we want to reach the world with walls or bridges?”  ‘Slick’ claims that this election is all about "change", but change from what, exactly?  The policies of the president who he helped to get elected, twice?   And then it was to rather mild applause that ‘Slick’ said, “That’s it. That’s the whole thing.”  And then he said that we can’t “put everyone in manufacturing” because “every year, fewer people can produce more stuff.”

Anyway, then it was along toward the end of his rather meandering and typically longwinded rant that ‘Slick’ made what was a rather bizarre reference to the Civil War, paraphrasing a friend who is a Lincoln expert who explained one of the reasons Lincoln went to war. ‘Slick’ said, “In the North there was no power elite, there was no slave labor, it was the greatest opportunity for people who started out poor to get into the middle class. We’ve got to do that again.”  Now I know old ‘Slick’ is supposed to be some sort of political genius, but I gotta tell ya, for the life of me I can’t quite figure out where exactly it was he was going with that.  He talks about no power elite, no slave labor, and since I’m not a Democrat, try as I might, I just wasn’t able to connect the dots here.   

I’m all for putting America first with fair taxing policies, stopping the pay for play of that the Clinton's are known for, giving ALL Americans a fair chance instead of the few chosen by the Clinton's, restructuring trade agreements to make them fair to ALL Americans, rebuilding the military so hated by the Democrat Party, making government abide by the people's desires rather than allowing the government to dictate to the people, restoring law and order to a currently lawless regime, developing a coherent foreign policy rather than buying off foreign governments, restoring respect to the office of the president, and many more common sense ideals. Anyone thinking of voting for Hitlery has no morals, ethics, and must be educationally deficient!!  It should be such an easy choice this November!

And remember how it was that Hitlery said, "I'll put Bill in charge of the economy!"   But let’s not forget how it was that our little housing bubble from a few years back was brought to you by something called the ‘Community Re-Investment Act’, another wholly-owned little Democrat scheme which was begun during the days of Jimmy Carter and made so very much worse by the ‘Slickmeister’ and his trusty sidekick, Janet Reno.  It was this fiasco that essentially forced banks into loaning money to folks knowing full well they would never be able to pay it back, and all under the guise of affordable housing. They told banks that if they didn’t as they were told they would be sued for unfair banking practices.  And it’s Hitlery who continues to blame the banks for the financial crisis of 2008.

And while most are more likely to remember ‘Slick’s’ sexcapades there in the Oval Office, few likely remember how it was that the Red Chinese were allowed to easily acquire satellite and missile technology from American companies during the first treasonous Clinton administration.  That was his truly impeachable offense.  And I fear what could be the result of future acquisitions that I’m sure would be encouraged to take place in another Clinton administration.  You see these people are allowed to run things as they please with complete impunity. It is the same with that thing with Barry “Almighty.”  Barry runs his mouth 24/7 and now threatens that he will continue to speak freely when his term is over.  So go ahead Barry, and any reasonably intelligent folks will pay you very little attention.

And for all of those folks who just can’t bring themselves to vote for Trump, I thought I would take this opportunity to let them know what it is that they will be voting for by either sitting this election out or by voting for the pothead, Gary Johnson.  Because not voting for Trump, is a vote for: 1) Sanctuary cities. 2) Bankrupting future generations. 3) Appeasing Islamic terrorists. 4) Bankrupting Social Security.  5) Illegals invading our country.  6) Low income housing forced into our suburbs.  7) Controlling our healthcare.  8) No religious freedom.  9) Homosexual marriage.  10) Low paying part-time jobs. 11) The releasing of thousands of felons. 12) Abortions with no restrictions.  And 13), Flooding this country with Muslim terrorists.  And for all that all you gotta do is stay home on Election Day. 

When all is said and done at this gathering in Michigan, how many of those on attendance actually had a clue about what it was that old ‘Slick’ was actually talking about?  If he made the argument that it was a change election four years ago, then isn’t it fair to say that he was basically admitting that Barry screwed things up in his first term.  And since he's again making the same argument that this is a change election, then isn’t he saying that Barry really screwed things up in his second term.  Hitlery’s entire campaign has been that she's running for Barry’s third term and will continue with his same screwed up policies.  I’m thinking that ‘Slick’ has gone round the bend and, apparently, so has Hitlery.  Does anybody truly want Hitlery as our president with the ‘Slickmeister’ serving as her chief advisor?

Monday, October 3, 2016

IT’S NOT JUST THE DEMOCRATS THAT PEOPLE DON’T TRUST…


It was on NBC’s “Meet The Press,” this past Sunday, during a ‘discussion’ on the current presidential election that leftwing loon Michael Moore said, “I don’t think people do trust the Democrats.”  Now speaking as conservative Republican, and as someone who knows a few folks who vote Democrat, I’ve never thought that those who reliably vote for Democrats do so based on trust.  Usually the ‘only’ reason that many of them even vote for Democrats in the first place is because they feel they’re far more likely to end up receiving lots of ‘free’ stuff than they would be if they were to vote for Republicans.  Because with sleaze bag Democrats, that’s really all they care about.  And besides, it’s Republicans who usually talk about creating jobs and it’s the Democrats who generally are of the opinion that no one should have to work who doesn’t want to.  For Democrats, work is nothing but a dirty four letter word.       

Getting back to “Meet The Press” it was host Chuck Todd who said, “Clearly, Democrats let them down, right? I mean, is that the issue here, and she’s just another Democrat, and they don’t trust them anymore?”  To which Moore responded, “I don’t think people do trust the Democrats. How else could a socialist win 22 states?  I mean, in my state of Michigan, Bernie Sanders won.  If Hillary Clinton and the Democrats had a difficult time with him, that should have been the red flag to everybody, that there is a mood out there where people are upset at the Democrats and the Republicans. What has to happen here, though, like with the Brexit vote in England, is that people where I’m from have to understand that why they may not like Hillary that much or she may be a bitter pill to swallow or whatever, you better take your medicine because the opposite is going to be much, much worse.”

Moore asks how it is that a socialist cold win in 22 states?  Has this fat turd not been paying the least bit of attention?  Because in comparing the Democrat Party from as recently as the 1990s to the Democrat Party of 2016 the only thing that they have in common is their name.  Democrats are very fond of saying that if Ronald Reagan were running in 2016 he would not be seen as a suitable candidate to today’s Republican Party.  But much the same thing can be said of John Kennedy.  Kennedy would never be seen as a suitable candidate for today’s Democrat Party.  He would be viewed as being much too far to the right?  Today’s Democrats ARE Socialists.  And it’s upon closer inspection of Hitlery’s choice for VP, Tim Kaine, that it’s in very short order that one would find he has some very close ties with questionable individuals who are some pretty hardcore leftists.  And Hitlery is as much of a socialist as is Sanders.  

But trust is from being an issue only for the left.  Because many of us who vote for Republicans have pretty much come to the end of our rope after having been lied to, and very purposely so, in 2009, 2011 and again in 2013.  There were many promises in all three of those election years about how if we voted for Republicans they would do all within their power to curb an out of control Barry.  But after each one of those elections it became very clear, very quickly, that those who had made all those promises actually intended to keep very few, if any.  And in so doing what they did was to essentially lay the groundwork for the current Donald Trump insurgency.  Even George W.  Bush, who had both houses of Congress for 2 years, continued the illegal Sanctuary Cities, as well as his father’s absurd prohibition against firearms on American military installations, both of which resulted in scores of senseless murders. 

Look, when it comes to trusting our politicians, regardless of political party, we do so at our own risk.  And it will likely be only after we realize that there is only one political party in America that we will then choose to focus on getting rid of our corrupt politicians.  And to be honest, there is no time like the present to move forward with the process by sending Hitlery Clinton back to New York.  The governed, regardless of party affiliation, expect results from their government.  You can make excuses about intent all day long, but if it doesn't put food on the table, those intentions are worthless.  Well-intentioned bungling that causes widespread misery is just the same to us as malicious intent. We need jobs that can provide a decent standard of living, not excuses, and not a torrent of ten dollar words they learned in their Ivy League schools to hide the fact that they're not capable of getting results.

The bottom line here is that we all must move beyond identifying ourselves as being merely Republican or Democrat and focus, to the greatest extent possible, on simply being Americans if we are to have any hope of regaining control of what’s left of our country.  We need to ignore all that we have been told, and are still being told, by the many elites in this country whether it’s those from our entertainment industry, those in corporate America or especially those who have been in Washington for their entire adult lives.  We need to question the motives of those who wish to rule over us, as well as their many accomplices, and in one loud and very clear voice.  Our ‘leaders’, and their allies, must be made to understand that this is ‘our’ country and our ‘leaders’ work for us and it is we who pay their rather exorbitant salaries.  Americans must unite as one against what is a growing threat to our freedoms. 

HITLERY IS NO FRIEND OF THE MIDDLE CLASS…


I guess when one sits atop a family fortune in excess of $100 million, it tends to be a little difficult to take notice of the peons below.  However, Hitlery has reiterated throughout her campaign to become the nation’s next president that she’s going to be there for those folks in the middle class and, despite her statements to the contrary, not raise their taxes.  But when a reporter recently asked what income range she might be talking about, Hitlery took the rather long way around when answering.

Hitlery was asked to define the middle class not only “numerically” but also “philosophically,” and so, she began there, touting it as the “social, economic engine of our country.”  She went on to say it’s “a reflection of the success of the United States from the very beginning.”  She then struggled to nail down an income range when she was asked, saying the “middle class is a hard-to-define economic target.”  A hard to define economic target?  What the Hell does that mean?

Hitlery said, “The way I talk about it is to say we know what the median income in America is, but if you’re living in high-cost areas, if you have kids you’re trying to educate and send to college, if you face healthcare costs that are beyond the average; staying in and progressing up in the middle class takes more money in some parts of America than it does in others.”  And what she ignores completely is the fact that the policies of the last eight years have caused the median income to go down.    

Hitlery continues to stand by her pledge to not raise taxes on the middle class and said that means anyone making under $250,000.  She likes that number because that’s what, “President Obama had adhered to and something my husband adhered to.”  Hitlery said, “The middle class is both real and aspiration.”  And then went on to say, “And I want to make sure that it remains strong and it gives people a sense of security and confidence and optimism about their futures.”  What’s she talking about?

So let me see if I have this right.  Hitlery doesn't know what it means to wipe a server clean, or that she wasn't allowed to use a private server for official business, or that she wasn't supposed to delete her emails, OR even what the letter "C" indicates on classified material.  And now, apparently, can't do something as simple as specify what qualifies as middle class.  And yet we’re supposed to consider her as being the most qualified person to ever run for President?  Nope sorry, I just don’t think so!

If she's so qualified why is she unable to define the middle class?  Hitlery says she likes the $250,000 mark because that's what her husband stuck to.  But let's analyze that.  One dollar in 1990 had the "buying power" of $1.88 in 2016.  So by Hillary's thinking, to be on par with her husband, she should NOT be taxing anyone TODAY making less than $470,000.  Or another way to look at it, is raising taxes on people making more than $250K, is equivalent to taxing people who made more than $133K in 1990. 

Personally, I would argue that her inability, or perhaps her unwillingness, to define the middle class has much more to do with the fact that it has been the Democrat Party, albeit with some help from liberal Republicans, that has worked very hard, for decades, to place the middle class in its current dire straits.  And if she can avoid being pinned down, just long enough, when it comes to what equates to the middle class she can continue to be vague when it comes to who will be paying higher taxes.

People need to realize that the cost to this nation, fiscally, economically, socially, militarily as well as internationally of putting another Clinton into the White House would be so great as to make it impossible to survive.  We simply cannot afford to elect anyone who’s willing to continue with the very same destructive policies from the last 8 years that have only succeeded in bringing this nation to the edge of complete ruin.  So I ask you, please choose wisely when casting your ballot in 36 days. 

Saturday, October 1, 2016

HITLERY…LET THE PROPPING UP BEGIN…


Apparently, that which was once considered to be a sure thing, is now slowly becoming that which some are saying may be questionable at best.  Because while Hitlery continues to suffer from record high unfavorable ratings, there are reports that warn she may not be able to hold together the same coalition responsible for electing Barry “Almighty”.  In an effort to accomplish that Hitlery’s campaign has now come up with a new “Suicide Squad” video.  The video features Barry, wife Moochelle Obama ‘Slow Joe’ Biden, and those two socialist losers, Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth ‘Pocahontas’ Warren all trying to convince folks to vote for Hitlery.  

The video also features a thumping soundtrack as these popular members of the Democrat Party explain why it is that THEY are voting FOR Hitlery, and you should too.  In the video it’s Barry who says, “I really, really, really want to elect Hillary Clinton.”  And then it’s ‘Pocahontas who says, “I just have one message for you, don’t screw this up.”  Next up is ‘Slow Joe’ who says, “I’ve known Hillary a long, long, long, time.”  Bernie pipes up and says, “Hillary Clinton is the superior candidate hands down.”  And then it’s Moochelle who says, “I am inspired by her persistence, her heart, and her gut.”  Inspired by her gut?  Sorry, but she lost me there.

How inspiring right?  I mean talk about enthusiasm, these folks just ooze enthusiasm.  The video features lots of footage of Hitlery standing with the popular Democrats, as if by doing so she can, by osmosis I guess, soak up some of their ‘likeability’ and therefore somehow make herself more popular to those who can’t stand the crooked bitch!  But nowhere in the video does Hitlery actually speak, and there’s a reason for that.  And the message? Join Barry and Moochelle, ‘Slow Joe’, Bernie and Liz, as they suck it up and vote for Hitlery.  I’m just wondering how it is that anyone watching this bizarre little video will feel compelled to go out and vote for ‘Crooked Hitlery’. 

With only weeks left before the election, Team Hitlery has each of these supposed ‘star’ Democrats out on the trail stumping for the Democrat nominee. On Monday, October third, it’s old ‘Slow Joe’ Biden who will travel to Florida to campaign for Hitlery in Orlando and Sarasota.  And on Tuesday, October fourth, ‘Pocahontas’ Warren will campaign for her in Las Vegas while Moochelle will be campaigning for her on the same day by making an appearance in both Raleigh and Charlotte, North Carolina.  It was this past Wednesday that Bernie teamed up with Hitlery in Durham, New Hampshire and played to a less than impressive crowd.

But ya know, as I looked at these 5 clowns the first thing that came to mind is some sort of a weird little commie rogues gallery. The state-controlled media, which even includes more than a few on Fox News, has become an entity that Joseph Goebbels would be proud of.  And the number, and intensity, of lies, regarding Hitlery’s GOP opponent, that are being passed off as truth are unparalleled.  And the big fear for me is what will the radicals do if Hitlery doesn’t win?  I believe they are capable of burning it all down.  Like the spoiled children that don’t get their way, willing to take their toys and go home, but only after destroying things.

I understand why Hitlery is using these people to campaign for her, but even after a debate that nearly everyone said she won, and even with Bernie in tow, she only drew roughly 500 people.  Meanwhile, President-In-Waiting Trump, the loser of the first debate, drew 20,000 plus people at his first event, with thousands more who couldn’t get into the event to hear him speak because of fire laws.  So what I can’t figure out is why all these polls at least appear to be so close?  And apparently, as was pointed out the other day by someone in the media, even Mike Pence's rallies outdraw Hitlery's even with all her other campaigners along with her.

It was back in 2008 that Barry had a slightly different opinion of Hitlery.  You see, it was then that he said, "Her basic view about this election is that the say anything, do anything, special interest-driven politics of Washington, that that's how it's got to be."  Barry also said, "Sen. Clinton – this is the same person who has taken more money from lobbyists than any other candidate, Democratic or Republican. Taken more money from drug company lobbyists and insurance company lobbyists, and she's saying I'm out of touch? Who do you think is out of touch?"  So I think the time has finally come for us to listen to our commander in chief's words.

At the end of the day, our only hope is that a landslide win for Trump becomes clear very early on, on Election Day.  So go out and vote Trump. Take a friend, or even two, who supports Trump with you and make sure they actually vote for him and both of you need to convince at least one Hitlery supporter to swing!  Because if the election is even remotely close Barry and his weaponized administration, along with the Democrat political cartel, WILL try to steal it.  The illegal, felon and cemetery demographics will surely turn out to vote Hitlery early and often.  We already know that Hitlery will win all the Democrat districts by 106-145%, just like Barry did.

Meanwhile her flunkies are pushing new voter registration.  In Virginia that comes in the form of allowing felons to vote. And voter ID laws are being painted as "racist", of course.  Meanwhile Illegal aliens are also being registered to vote, illegally!  If the Democrats didn't use the ‘race card’, or the ‘woman card’, they’d have NO cards at all.  They’ve had eight years to push our country toward the cliff and have dumbed down our kids in their failing public schools.  Our kids are no longer being taught to read, write or do simple math.  Instead they continue to have the PC bullshit rammed down their throats.  Our kids no longer learn, instead they’re indoctrinated.   

Democrats, liberals, progressives, or whatever you want to call these anti-America, zealots are desperate to limit our freedom of speech and to force gun control propaganda down the throats of our young.  Hitlery uses her same old speeches, word for word, about how she’s "been working for the children for 30 years!"  Yet what has she managed to accomplish?  Absolutely nothing!  Her manta of “It Takes A Village” is nothing but leftist drivel. Our Children are being brainwashed, and worse we’re allowing it to happen!  Democrats, like Hitlery, see that as their pathway to controlling the future.  Therefore it is our job as parents to deny them that path.