PRETENDING THE THREAT DOESN’T EXIST, WILL NOT REDUCE THE BODY COUNT…

Thank goodness we have Barry “Almighty” on the case, otherwise I might truly be worried about all these Muslims being allowed to stream in to my country.  But he’s got his finger on the pulse and will get to the bottom of it and finally put a stop to all this murder, madness and mayhem.  Sure he will!  Instead, he’s done his best to downplay the crazy notion that America and Western Civilization is under relentless attack from barbaric animals slaughtering humans in the name of Islam. About Orlando he said, “And there also at this stage is no direct evidence that he was part of a larger plot.”

And Barry went on to say, “It appears to be similar to what we saw in San Bernardino — but we don’t know yet.”  Appears?  Ya think?  Gee, for a moment there I thought we were in some serious trouble here.  I thought the savage execution of 50 revelers in Orlando might be part of a larger plot.  I mean, if that were the case and this were actually part of a “larger plot,” then it might kind of be Barry’s fault that this stuff continues to happen over and over again. It might mean that all these killings of innocent civilians from Boston to San Bernardino are, say, perhaps a national security matter. Maybe?

And if they were actually part of a “larger plot” it might also raise some seriously awkward questions about who exactly is doing all the killing and whom exactly it is that they are targeting and — oh, I don’t know — what exactly their motivations might be.  And it was to the reporters gathered there in the Oval Office that Barry said, “We don’t yet know the motivations.”  And what’s even more amazing, at least from where I’m sitting, is that the assembled reporters didn’t all explode into laughter when Barry said this.  Because is that any responsible journalist regardless of political persuasion take such drivel seriously?

Or, maybe one of these enterprising young ‘journalists’ in search of a big story could have spoken up or offered to pull Barry aside to explain to him the motivation here.  But instead, their reaction, or lack of any reaction, goes a long way in demonstrating just how far in the tank the media has become.  The biggest reason, of course, Barry remains the only person left on the planet who doesn’t know Omar Mateen’s motivations and refuses to accept the existence of a “larger plot” against America and civilization is that if he were to accept these plainly obvious truths, then he would actually have to do something about it.

And it’s there in that lies the rub.  The single worst thing Barry and his fellow Democrats could be forced to do today would be to take a very serious look at their blatantly insane immigration policy where anyone, literally even if they just crawled out of the Rio Grande, dripping wet, is welcomed with open arms.  And if you come from a country that is known as a hotbed of violent jihad, well that’s all the better.  Or at least it certainly seems that way.  Syrian refugees are streaming into our country and government officials admit they are not able to perform even the most basic background checks on to see if they have ties to terrorist organization.

This is why Barry really doesn’t want to see the “larger plot” or acknowledge how obvious the “motivations” are. He would rather use events like this to score partisan political points and make nonsensical complaints about gun ownership in America.  Barry said, “We are also going to have to think about the risks we are willing to take by being so lax in how we make very powerful firearms available to the people in this country.”   And he added, “And this is something that obviously I’ve talked about for a very long time.”  Really?  Been talking about for a very long time?  Does he really think we’re that stupid?  Apparently so!

Um, okay, so how about this, Barry: You go ahead and disarm every last terrorist now lurking in this country who is busy plotting their next jihadi massacre in this country and then maybe we can talk about those stricter gun laws that you seem to desperate to bring about.  But until you do that and, after 7+ years, finally start taking your job of keeping Americans safe just a bit more seriously, we the people are going to keep right on buying just as many guns as we fill we need to and stockpiling tons of ammunition so we can properly protect ourselves, our families and our neighbors in this red hot war on America and western civilization.

Because it's now gotten to the point where it’s absolutely mind-boggling that we continue to allow into our country those whose only purpose in life is to come into our country and to kill us.  These Muslims want nothing less than to kill as many of us as they can and while half of the country continues to bury their heads in the sand the rest of us are doing our best to sound the alarm.  It makes you wonder just what it is that these idiots do not understand, especially after Orlando?  America does not need a president Hitlery if we are to have any hope of saving the America and to prevent it from being lost forever.  What will we tell our kids if we do nothing?

OBAMA, AGAIN HARPS ON ‘CLIMATE CHANGE’…

The analogy that I feel is most fitting, so is therefore the one I tend to use the most often whenever discussing Barry’s continuing fixation with the many times over discredited ‘climate change’ theory has to do with the striking similarities between his behavior and that of a dog and his, or her, favorite bone.  And we saw yet another example of this just this past Saturday when Barry chose to visit to Yosemite National Park and give a little speech, during which he made sure to make time to tout his administration’s environmental record and to warn Americans about the dangers of ‘climate change’, albeit, and is always the case, with false information.

It was in this little speech of his which he gave there at the park that Barry said, “Fires are raging across the west right now … all while it’s still really early in the season.”  And in doing so Barry now joins California Governor Jerry ‘Moon Beam’ Brown in making a connection that is at best deceptive, and at worst nothing but an outright lie, between wildfires and “climate change” that scientists long ago totally rejected.  But nothing new there, leftists like these two morons claim to big supporters of science, but it would seem that the only “science” they actually support is the “science” they can use to bolster their idiotic claims.

It was reported by numerous media outlets last October that scientists rebuked ‘Moon Beam’ over his attempt to link recent California wildfires to ‘climate change.’  And it was also reported, by the Los Angeles Times no less, in August how it was that old ‘Moon Beam’ blamed “climate change” for the Rocky fire in August, and specifically challenged Republican presidential candidates to tackle ‘climate change’ in the context of “Longer fire seasons, extreme weather and severe droughts.”  ‘Moon Beam’ proves the point how leftists always think that the government is the solution for every problem, even those problems that don’t actually exist. 

Not surprising, scientists say that old ‘moon Beam’ is wrong and that the scientific evidence simply does not link recent fires to ‘climate change.’  Scientists even went so far as to accuse ‘Moon Beam’ of engaging in “noble-cause corruption” of ‘climate science.’  While fires could become more likely in the future, the link in the present has simply not been established. False statements like the Barry’s could, they warn, lead to inappropriate policies. Barry’s statement was only the latest in what has been a long string of many bogus examples of “climate change” hysteria that we have continued to hear coming from him and his party.

Earlier this month we heard Barry warning how in the not too distant future we would actually come to see Manhattan “underwater” unless action was taken, and soon, on ‘climate change.’  Scientists say that some portions of Manhattan ‘could’ experience flooding, but not the entire island, even under the most catastrophic models.  Barry also touted his administration’s record in expanding public lands and taking regulatory actions, including enforcing the Endangered Species Act.  That which many Californians blame for overzealous protection of the Delta smelt at the expense of water allocations to farmers.

I very much doubt that Barry, or any of the many other Democrats who support the cockamamie ‘climate change’ narrative actually believe that ‘climate change’ is taking place.  For them it’s nothing more than a means to an end, it’s about getting a carbon tax slush fund created which they can then dole out to their contributors and use to secure votes.  ‘Moon Beam’ showed the way, creating a tax that he admits is purely symbolic and will achieve nothing to lower global temperatures. And that he uses as a slush fund to reward union contributions with Bacon Act prevailing wage jobs by the hundreds of millions dollar.  Illegally might I add. 

California’s Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006 provided for the carbon taxes but required that the taxes to be spent only on carbon reductive projects and programs. The Prop 1A that approved the Bullet Train Bonds required that the train be built only from the bond money, operating revenues and federal subsidies.  ‘Moon Beam’ has called for $500M a year of the carbon taxes to be spent on the train, that by a government study is not carbon reductive and violates Prop 1A specifically. A double violation of law, but since California is a Democrat operation from top to bottom, the issue is ignored by the government and it has been sitting in the courts for years.

And Al Gore who has made 10s, if not 100s, of millions for dollars off this scam has also showed the way.  He’s proven that you can say anything no matter how outrageous and still be able to cash in on the soft headed who demand to be taxed to save the earth, with a program that is admittedly incapable to having any real effect. Al Gore got rich off carbon credit trading, and Democrats expect to get rich and maintain power via carbon taxes.  So say anything, do anything, in order to get power and get rich, regarding ‘climate change’ in order to cash in and take what little disposable income the American people may still have.

Look, the fact is that Barry wasn't really hired to do a job.  More than half of those who voted for this radical left-wing, Islamic collaborating, corrupt to his core, narcissistic, pathological liar of a Democrat did so for what they were promised for doing so.  Here in the 21st century we should be less concerned about such things as "affirmative action" and far more concerned about all of the idiots and enemies of the state that put him into office. I'm also pointing at all the right-wingers who seemed to see it as somehow making sense to either stay home on Election Day, or to waste their votes on third party candidates or write-ins.

And it’s many of those who are now once again making the same kind of noise and proving that they have learned absolutely nothing from the last two elections.  As I have tried to point out before, Trump is not the perfect candidate, but no matter how you choose to look at him when comparing him to Hitlery Clinton, who has repeatedly proven that hers would be a third Barry term, Trump has to be viewed as being the better choice.  I did not begin by being on the Trump train, but when my guy dropped out I was left with little choice but get onboard.  To do anything else would be to say that I support, or condone, the insanity that has occurred over the last 7+ years.

‘DINGY HARRY’ REID, “NRA A BIGGER THREAT TO AMERICANS THAN ISLAM!!!”

Democrats wasted precious little time in exploiting the death of 49 people resulting from this nation’s most recent, and deadliest yet, Islamic terrorist attack in Orlando. And the Democrats appear to now be absolutely salivating over what they see as being another opportunity they feel provides to them with another opportunity to go after law abiding gun owners.  And I’m surprised we haven’t yet heard from ‘Fast Eddie’ Rendell regarding just how “horrific’ this attack was.  He seems to feel such atrocities can be very useful to the Democrat gun-control cause.

But who we have heard from and only two days after this horrendous attack, was ‘Dingy Harry’ Reid.  But not to offer sympathy to the victims, but, instead, to exploit the deaths of these innocent people.  'Dingy Harry' blamed the National Rifle Association (NRA) which he described as being “bad, really bad” and the group, Gun Owners of America who he said is “even worse than bad.”  And it was while speaking from there on the Senate floor earlier this week that he made the claim that the American people actually want stricter gun control. 

‘Dingy’ said, “More than 80% of Americans want to close so-called terror loopholes, preventing people on terror watch lists from purchasing firearms.”  But I’d be curious to know if the loopholes to which ‘Dingy’ referred to as being of so much concern to Americans might actually the loopholes that have been created by ‘Dingy Harry’ and his buddy Barry and that have resulted in allowing hundreds, if not thousands, of potential Islamic terrorists to enter into this country?  Because I gotta tell ya, those are the loopholes that are foremost in my mind!

And ‘Dingy’ went on to say, “Yet in spite the public’s demand for action Senate Republicans continue to cower - cower before the NRA and the Gun Owners of America. The NRA is bad, really bad. Gun Owners of America is even worse than bad.”  And he added, “These two organizations are competing - seeing just how extreme they can be in pushing for more guns and fewer protections.”  You know, there is a special place in Hell for lying pieces shit like ‘Dingy Harry’.  And as far as I’m concerned, the sooner he heads in that direction, the better!

Because let’s face it, old ‘Dingy’ has never been a fan of the NRA.  In fact it was just last October that ‘Dingy’ was heard making the idiotic claim that Americans’ safety is being sacrificed to the “radical agenda” of the National Rifle Association (NRA) by Republicans who are nothing more than “puppets” of the NRA to begin with.  Now if there is a radical agenda underway here, it’s by those who favor allowing more Muslims into this country.  And if ‘Dingy’ wants to talk about politicians being puppets then maybe we should talk about Democrats and Planned Parenthood.

And it was also during that same time that ‘Dingy’ said he was busy reaching out to other Democrat senators regarding background checks legislation in the wake of the attack that had occurred at Umpqua Community College (UCC), and he even went so far as to actually suggest that those Republican Senators who were blocking the gun control measure were doing so on behalf of the NRA.  Despite the fact there was absolutely no truth in his idiotic rhetoric, ‘Dingy’ knew it would play well with the mentally challenged among us. 

And it was according to Politico, at the time, that the Democrats were doing their best in an attempt to gain some level of momentum from the cumulative effect of the UCC attack, the on-air shootings in Virginia, and the Charleston church shooting.  ‘Dingy’ said then that if the Senate “[doesn’t] take action, [they] are equally as responsible for innocent deaths as the sick individuals who plot and carry out these horrific measures.”  I agree, Democrats ARE just as responsible for the death of innocents as are the rabid Muslims who commit these crimes! 

Republican Senators said, and rightfully so, they weren’t inclined to support the push because it was nothing more that purely political in its motivation. Republicans bolstered their position by pointing out that the gunmen in Oregon, Virginia, and Charleston all passed strict background checks to acquire the weapons they used to kill innocents.  So the political posturing by ‘Dingy’ and his fellow Democrats were just that.  Let’s face it, you have to be pretty naïve to believe ‘Dingy Harry’ sees anything other than an opportunity when it comes to these shootings.

So if mass shooters are already passing background checks to acquire their guns, what good does it do to push to expand background checks to even more sales?  Especially, as in the case of the Orlando shooter where the FBI was warned about the guy not once but at least twice.  The FBI was informed about this guy by both the owner of the gun store regarding what the shooter was wanting to purchase and by Disney who apparently had video of the guy appearing to be casing the park.  And yet there was no serious follow up by the FBI?  Why because he was a Muslim?

Democrats declaring that we need to ban certain guns is nothing more than a ruse. They don’t want the American people to have access to guns so any lie told is seen as justifiable. The desire to ban ‘assault rifles’ is viewed as an attempt to get their foot in the door.  Because what’ll come next is whatever gun they deem as being ‘too dangerous.’ They know the victims in Orlando were killed with a semi-automatic rifle which is not an "assault rifle".  But the point is, they don't care, they need a starting point and this is the easiest for the left to exploit.

But the fact of the matter is that by NOT allowing patrons to concealed carry in the Pulse nightclub in Orlando, the left, and the anti-gunners, are now essentially COMPLICITE IN 49 MURDERS!  They banned anyone from offering a means of protection in the club and thus forced the public to be easy targets.  Imagine if there had been but person in the club that night who had possessed a permit to carry a weapon.  Now I’m saying that no one would have died that night, but what I am fairly confident in saying is that 49 people would not have died.

The liberal Democrats can try to remove our right to free speech, or our right to assemble and to belong to an organization such as the NRA or to strip away our right to keep and bear arms and make it illegal to own fire arms. But when they actually send someone to enforce the removal of those rights I have no doubt there will be bloodshed and not because anyone wants it. But because those of us who believe in our Constitution won't stand for it. Our ancestors fought a revolution and 2 world wars to keep and defend these rights.

While all of this anti-gun rhetoric is allowed under our right to freedom of speech, we need to be smart enough to recognize it for what it is, which is nothing more than an attempt by Democrats to deny us what are our God given rights under our Constitution.  Democrats must understand that there are still enough of us left willing to defend those rights and making the attempt to take them from us will not end well for them.  The anti-gun forces may well win in the end, but they may well end up with the blood of millions on their hands.  That I can promise them.

It’s ‘Dingy Harry’, and the rest of the Democrat Party, that is what’s really bad for this country. Their hatred of the Constitution and of freedom in general puts them in the same boat as the KKK which the Democrat Party originated. The true reason behind their efforts for stricter gun control laws has absolutely nothing to do with any concern for public safety.  It’s all about control and enslavement of the people.  And the sooner more people come to understand that the greater the chance of what remains of our Republic being able to survive. 

And finally I would like to point out how those people in that Orlando club, had 4 hours to devise a plan of attack, those people on flight 93 had but five minutes. And not a single person out of the 300 in the club that night made any attempt to disarm this maggot. Three people on flight 93 saved countless Americans. How many people were murdered while people played dead, at least at Sandy Hook adults threw themselves in front of children to save a life…4 hours…nothing.  What’s happened to America that we have allowed ourselves to be made into such cowering wimps?

GWENN MOORE – ONE LONE BRAIN CELL STRETCHED TO THE ABSOLUTE BREAKING POINT…

Something that is becoming just a bit more obvious with each passing day, at least to me, is the fact that while all morons may not be Democrats, there is absolutely no doubt, that all Democrats, and ALL those who vote for them, definitely are morons.  Case in point is Democrat Gwenn Moore.  While there is, very likely, another explanation for what’s behind her, very obvious, diminished mental capacity, for the time being I’m just going to say that it’s because she’s a Democrat and leave any other potential causes to the reader’s own imagination.

Anyway, the purpose of Ms. Moore being the topic of this my latest attempt to make clear how it is that Democrats have no business being in ANY position of power. You see, it was recently brought to my attention that she has come up with something she refers to as being a great plan for reducing the national deficit.  And that plan is, to force wealthy Americans to pass drug tests before being able to have their tax deductions approved.  Now why didn’t someone else think of that?  Who says this bitch is dumber even than her pal, Sheila Jackson Lee?  ME!

It was in an interview she had with the Guardian, that this apparent escapee from a mental ward stated how it is that she is “sick and tired — and sick and tired of being sick and tired — of the criminalization of poverty.”  She said, “We’re not going to get rid of the federal deficit by cutting poor people off Snap.”  And then she went on to say, “But if we are going to drug-test people to reduce the deficit, let’s start on the other end of the income spectrum.”  So I just have to ask, is she not an absolute moron?  Who thinks this way other than a Democrat?

So apparently Ms. Moore now plans on introducing her new bill, something that she chooses to call the ‘Top 1% Accountability Act’, which will “engage the wealthy in a conversation about what fair tax policy looks like.”  The bill would force households with “itemized deductions of more than $150,000” — a.k.a the one percent — “to submit to the IRS a clear drug test from a sample no more than three months old, or take the much lower standard deduction when filing their taxes.”  I’d say this country has now officially hit rock bottom.

And then in what I can only assume to be was an effort on her part to prove herself to be even more of moron than most already see her as being, Moore went on to claim that she actually has her fellow Wisconsin representative, House Speaker Paul ‘RINO’ Ryan, to thank for the inspiration behind her bill.  She said, “When he stood in front of a drug treatment center and rolled out his anti-poverty initiative, pushing this narrative that poor people are drug addicts, that was the last straw.”  Well there’s brain dead, than there’s Ms. Moore.

Moore said, “Even Oprah gets the mortgage interest deduction.”  And she went on to note, “We might really save some money by drug-testing folks on Wall Street, who might have a little cocaine before they get their deal done.”  You know, it’s no wonder our country is in the shape that it is.  And you have to wonder about the morons who are able to convince themselves to actually vote for someone like this nut.  There can’t be but one shared brain cell in her entire district.  How is it that anyone can look at Ms. Moore and say, “I want to vote for her?”   

Now I have say what Moore has come up with is an utterly stupid, liberal idea!  Let’s decide to drug test all those who are essentially forced to fund welfare programs and refuse to drug test those who are recipients of the many welfare benefits because of the stigma we’re told it creates.  Idiot politicians like Moore have made it impossible to escape welfare or to move up the economic ladder in order to preserve their voting block with the promise of even more freebies!!  Welfare should HELP the person up, not enslave them to their government!!

But hey, I’ve got even a better idea.  And while it may not go far in solving our continuing national debt problem, it may help to insure that those who serve in Congress are bit more sober in how they approach their job.  My plan is this: Since members of Congress are essentially paid by we the taxpayers, I think it’s they who should be drug tested, and on a regular basis.  When I was in the Navy we had to pee in a bottle every quarter, so I think those serving in Congress should be subjected to the very same policy.  And the sooner the better! 

SLIMY DEMOCRATS UP TO THEIR TYPICAL DIRTY TRICKS…

So riddle me this…If Donald Trump truly is the target rich environment that everyone claims he is, including many of these #NeverTrump imbeciles, why is it then that some top allies of Hitlery Clinton seem to have gone to a whole lot of trouble in accumulating over 200 pages of opposition research on the guy?  And the purpose of this ‘research’, I can only assume, is to be available for release at what the Democrats would view as being just the right moment and all in their effort to make the more seriously flawed candidate, Hitlery, to at least appear as being the more attractive candidate.

So was this done simply because they were unable to control themselves because this is what Democrats ALWAYS do? They smear, they slander and they malign. It’s in their DNA.  Or, does it perhaps go a bit deeper than that?  Could it be that all of these polls we’ve been seeing lately, that currently appear to show Hitlery widening her lead over Trump, be nothing more than an attempt to convince those who might choose to vote for Trump that doing so is nothing but a lost cause?  I must admit they’d have to come into possession of some pretty unsavory stuff in order to convince me that Hitlery is the better candidate.

And I guess how their little scheme was able to make it into the light of day in the first place was all courtesy of whomever (the Russians?) it was that hacked into the Democratic National Committee’s (DNC) computer database. This 200+ page anti-Trump playbook, entitled "Donald Trump Report," includes an attack on the presumptive Republican presidential nominee's character and record, and hundreds of pages describing instances where Trump has changing changed his stance or what he has said regarding any number of issues.  It was leaked online following this week's report that the DNC was breached by Russian hackers.

And it’s in this little Democrat treasure trove of slime that has been put together on Trump that he is, of course, pilloried as being everything from a "bad businessman" to being the "misogynist in chief."  The document was apparently created by someone identified as being a Democrat ‘strategist’, aka sleaze-ball.  And the author’s name is Warren Flood and this little work of political slander of his was put together back on December 19th, 2015, and was then leaked by an individual calling himself 'Guccifer 2.0,' a reference to the notorious, now-imprisoned Romanian hacker who hacked various American political figures in 2013. 

And it was in a statement to Fox News released late Wednesday that Trump downplayed the documents.  The statement read:  "This is all information that has been out there for many years. Much of it false and/or entirely inaccurate."  And it then went on to say, "We believe it was the DNC that did the hacking as a way to distract from the many issues facing their deeply flawed candidate and failed party leader. Too bad the DNC doesn't hack Crooked Hillary's 33,000 missing emails."  And, personally, I wouldn’t be too quick to discount such a theory.  I would put absolutely nothing past the political pond scum that is today’s Democrat Party.

According to the hacker/leaker what has thus far made it into the full light of day are but a few of the documents that make up the many thousands that were extracted when hacking into the DNC's network.  This hacker/leaker has claimed to have about 100 gigabytes of data which is said to include such things as financial reports, donor lists, personal emails and a whole lot more.  And it was this past Tuesday that former CIA officer Fred Fleitz said in a televised interview that the hack revealed a "stunning" lack of security on the part of the DNC.  Good, and it couldn’t happen to a more despicable organization because it show just how slimy of an operation it is.

The supposed hacker said it was "very easy" to obtain the files, and disputed claims by the DNC that no financial, donor or personal information was breached. According to the hacker, "DNC chairwoman Debbie Wizzerman Schultz said no financial documents were compromised. Nonsense!"  And he, or she, went on to say, "Just look through the Democratic Party lists of donors! They say there were no secret docs! Lies again! Also I have some secret documents from Hillary’s PC she worked with as the Secretary of State."  The documents don't reveal any real "dirt" on Trump, but they do list the seven "Top Narratives" the DNC plans to use to attack him.  And they are:

Trump Has No Core: "One thing is clear about Donald Trump, there is only one person he has ever looked out for and that’s himself. Whether it’s American workers, the Republican Party, or his wives, Trump’s only fidelity has been to himself and with that he has shown that he has no problem lying to the American people. Trump will say anything and do anything to get what he wants without regard for those he harms."

Divisive and Offensive Campaign: "There’s no nice way of saying it – Donald Trump is running a campaign built on fear-mongering, divisiveness, and racism. His major policy announcements have included banning all Muslims from entering the U.S., and calling Mexican immigrants 'rapists' and 'drug dealers' while proposing a U.S.-Mexico border wall. And Trump’s campaign rallies have become a reflection of the hateful tone of his campaign, with protestors being roughed up and audience members loudly calling for violence."

Bad Businessman: "Despite Trump's continual boasting about his business success, he has repeatedly run into serious financial crises in his career and his record raises serious questions about whether he is qualified to manage the fiscal challenges facing this country. Trump’s business resume includes a long list of troubling issues, including his company’s record of forcing people from their homes to make room for developments and outsourcing the manufacturing of his clothing line to take advantage of lower-wage countries like China and Mexico. His insight about the marketplace has proven wrong many times, including in the run-up to the Great Recession. And Trump’s record of irresponsible and reckless borrowing to build his empire – behavior that sent his companies into bankruptcy four times – is just one indication of how out-of-touch he is with the way regular Americans behave and make a living, and it casts doubt on whether he has the right mindset to tackle the country’s budget problems."

Dangerous & Irresponsible Policies: "Trump’s policies – if you can call them that – are marked by the same extreme and irresponsible thinking that shape his campaign speeches. There is no question that Donald Trump’s rhetoric is dangerous – but his actual agenda could be a catastrophe."

Misogynist in Chief: Through both his words and actions, Trump has made clear he thinks women’s primary role is to please men. Trump’s derogatory and degrading comments to and about women, as well as his tumultuous marriages, have been well publicized. And as a presidential candidate, Trump has adopted many of the backwards GOP policies that we’ve come to expect from his party.

Out of Touch: "Trump's policies clearly reflect his life as a 1-percenter. His plans would slash taxes for the rich and corporations while shifting more of the burden to the shoulders of working families. He stands with Republicans in opposing Wall Street reform and opposing the minimum wage. Trump clearly has no conception of the everyday lives of middle class Americans. His description of the “small” $1 million loan that his father gave him to launch his career is proof enough that his worldview is not grounded in reality."

Personal Life: "Not only does the current front-runner for the Republican presidential nomination have a history of controversial remarks about sexual assault, but as it turns out, his ex-wife Ivana Trump once used 'rape' to describe an incident between them in 1989. She later said she felt 'violated' by the experience."

Every time I see one of these stories it just tells me: 1) Trump is way out in front and the Muslim, anti-Second Amendment issues are really opening up a huge lead, and 2) The Establishment is more concerned about the end of their reign than ever as November nears and pulling out all the stops.  And really, if this is the best they can come up with it would seem to me that it pales in comparison to 30 years worth of stuff out there and that can be easily dredged up on Hitlery.  At least you can’t say Trump stood by and essentially watched while four Americans, including an ambassador, were butchered.  

There’s an old saying that goes a little like this: "The more that the truth is revealed, the more vehement the desire to suppress it."  I think that it’s becoming pretty apparent that Democrats and RINO's alike after having looked in the mirror have now begun to slip a little further into panic mode. Couple that with the silent majority they can't control and you have very desperate people doing very desperate things and it's only June. Buckle up all you Liberal buttercups, Trump naysayers and RINO turncoats, because there is little doubt that over the course of the next few months it’s going to turn out to be a pretty bumpy ride. 

We all know how members of the state-controlled media and those in power routinely get together, attend all the same events and have lifestyles that in no way resemble the lifestyle of most people here in the United States.  And they now seem a little worried that their private country club life may be on the way out.  So their response is invent stories and embellish items that have no importance in and effort maintain their hold on power.  But we the people must to be able to see through all of the bullshit if we are to have any hope of salvaging what’s left of our country. And we cannot afford to waste time listening to those on our side who simply hate Trump!

OBAMA CLAIMS HE’S MADE AMERICA SAFER…ARE YOU FEELING IT???

It was earlier this week during Tuesday morning press briefing that White House Spokesmoron, Josh Earnest, was heard telling those reporters present, "The president does believe it is important that his successor is somebody who recognizes that our country is safer than it was eight years ago, that we enhanced our standing around the world, that we've strengthened our alliances -- that we have refined and improved and strengthened our homeland security."

And what I found to be most amazing was that he was actually able to make it through the entire statement without breaking out into hysterical laughter.  Yes, things certainly do go a little nutty in election years where we elect a president.  How else is it that you could explain a press secretary of any administration making such a blatantly idiotic statement and expecting that anyone to actually believe it?  Unless of course they were experiencing some personal new blackout.

And then Earnest went on to say, "The American people do face a question about whether or not they want to build on that progress, because there surely is more that can be done to protect the American people."  Such an idiotic comment gives a whole new definition to ludicrous.  And when you consider that Earnest made his ridiculous comment two days after a Muslim American claimed his deadly attack on an Orlando nightclub was inspired by ISIS, you have to wonder, do they think we’re that stupid?

And then we had another genius, Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson, also speaking on Tuesday, who said that the FBI has "hundreds, if not thousands" of open investigations" going on, and he said the FBI "routinely" breaks up plots to the homeland.  And if that declaration was, somehow, supposed to make us feel safer, it fell way short.  Because if that was the intent, it has just the opposite effect.  I haven’t felt safe since Barry’s very first day as president.

It was also at Tuesday's White House briefing that a reporter asked Earnest about Barry and Hitlery using similar language to make the same points in their speeches on Tuesday.  The reporter asked: "And so, I'm wondering if you can talk at all about if there's coordination on that."  Earnest responded, "No...I'm not aware of any advanced coordination or notification that was provided by the White House to the Clinton campaign of the president's comments today."

Ernest went on to say, "That said, I don't think you should be particularly surprised that the president's comments and views on this topic are similar to the views and principles that are articulated by the woman who served as his secretary of state the during his first term in office.”  "We often -- you often hear me indicate that the president believes it is important for his successor to build on the progress that our country has made and not scrap it.”

I seems that such an idiotic comment just naturally begs the question, what progress, exactly, is it that’s been made?  Because from where I’m standing nothing that that Barry has done over the course of the last seven years could be defined as ‘progress.’ Ernest continued saying, “I often make that argument in the context of our country's success in digging out of the worst economic downturn since the Great Depression, and it is certainly true in that context."

Ernest said, "It also happens to be true in the context of our homeland security and our national security. The president does believe it is important that his successor is somebody who recognizes that our country is safer than it was eight years ago, that we enhanced our standing around the world, that we've strengthened our alliances -- that we have refined, and improved and strengthened our homeland security."  To view America as safer than it was eight years ago you’d have to be a complete moron!

And then it was in Barry’s own remarks, on Tuesday, where he noted, "Since before I was president, I have been clear about how extremist groups have perverted Islam to justify terrorism. As president, I have called on our Muslim friends and allies at home and around the world to work with us to reject this twisted interpretation of one of the world's great religions."  So what is this?  Naiveté?  Ignorance?  Complacency? What?  What’s he talking about, Muslim friends? There are no such things.

And then it was from Hitlery, speaking just a short time later in Pittsburgh, that we heard: "I have clearly said that we faced terrorist enemies who use a perverted version of Islam to justify slaughtering innocent people. We have to stop them, and we will. So if Donald suggests I won't call this threat what it is, he hasn't been listening. But I will not demonize and declare war on an entire religion."  Does anyone still see this as being anything other than a perverse excuse?   

Barry on Tuesday said, "There's no magic to the phrase 'radical Islam. It's a political talking point, not a strategy."  And then it was Hitlery who we again heard asking her audience, "Is Donald Trump suggesting that there are magic words that, once uttered, will stop terrorists from coming after us? Trump, as usual, is obsessed with name-calling,” she said. “From my perspective, it matters what we do, not just what we say.”  Identifying these murdering thugs by their rightful name is not name-calling!

At one point in her speech, Hitlery asked, "Will responsible Republican leaders stand up to their presumptive nominee?”  And it was also Barry who similarly asked, “Are we going to start treating all Muslim Americans differently? Are we going to start subjecting them to special surveillance...Do Republican officials actually agree with this?”  I’m here to tell you that any Republican official who wants my vote had better agree with it!  Members of this murderous cult need to be watched, and closely.

And it was at Tuesday's White House briefing that a second reporter pressed Earnest on the "unlikely coincidence" that both Barry and Hitlery would use such similar phrases.  Earnest again responded by saying, "Again, I'm not aware that anyone at the White House gave the Clinton campaign advanced notice of the president's comments. But I'm also not sitting here telling you that it's a coincidence."  Okay, if you say so, Josh.  It’s all very innocent!  And I’m being paranoid if I think something different.

Ernest said, "I think it should be apparent to all of you that President Obama and Secretary Clinton have similar approaches and consider the homeland security of the United States a top priority.”  He went on to say, "So I'm not making that case that it's a coincidence. I'm actually making a pretty bold case that they agree that these are principles worth fighting for and articulating and that the use of the word 'radical Islam' is a political talking point."  A political talking point?

Do you ever find yourself wondering from what insane asylum Barry finds these morons like Earnest, and Carney before him, who have absolutely no problem with so blatantly lying to the American people?  If he, and them, are so delusional as to expect the people in the US to believe this BS, they must think we have all spent the last seven years in seclusion while having access to no other information than the constant, and very leftwing, pabulum peddled by the state-controlled media.

And in all of my 64 years on this planet I must confess that I now feel less safe in this country, especially for my children and grandchildren, than I have ever felt before, by far.  Things have now gotten to the point where for the first time in my life, I actually felt the need to purchase a handgun in order to better protect myself and my family. While we don't feel safer, we also refuse to allow ourselves to become victims of those who Barry is far more interested in protecting than those of us born here.

OBAMA, THE GREATEST THREAT WE FACE FROM WITHIN…

And so it was then that, yesterday afternoon, we again were witness to Barry “Almighty” behaving at his very un-presidential best as he yet again went on the attack against the wrong enemy.  Barry proceeded to lash out against Donald Trump, and his many other critics, who complain that the fight against the Islamic State and radical extremist terrorism simply isn't being taken seriously enough because of Barry’s stubborn refusal to properly identify an enemy that has so very clearly demonstrated its determination to kill as many Americans as it can. 

During an address about the recent Orlando terrorist attack and the continuing threat of terrorism overall, Barry complained, "We cannot beat ISIL unless we call them 'radical Islam?'"  He went on to say, "What exactly using this label would accomplish and what will it change? Will it make ISIL less committed to try to kill Americans? Would it bring more allies for military strategy than it is served by this?"  The answer, he said, is "none of the above."  Barry said, "Calling a threat by a different name does not make it go away."  No, but it makes clear that you take the threat seriously!

And then Barry went on to say, "This is a political distraction. Before I was president, I have been cleared about how extremist group justifying terrorists. As president, I have called on our Muslim friends and allies at home and around the world to work with us to reject this twisted interpretation of one of the world's great religions.”  He said, "There is not a moment where we have not able to pursue a strategy because we didn't use the label "radical Islam.'"  Now, how is it that Barry can pursue a strategy when no real strategy would appear to even exist?  Is it me?

And not once has an adviser told him that if he uses the phrase would it turn the battles around, he added.  Right, and which one of his many stellar advisers is it that might actually tell him that?  Barry said, "So someone seriously thinks that we don't know who we are fighting."  And he added, "If there is anyone out there who thinks we are confused about who our enemies are, that would come to a surprise of the thousands of terrorists we have taken on our battlefield?"  No, I don’t think there’s any confusion on Barry’s part, he simply refuses to identify who the enemy really is!

Barry peppered his speech with references to Trump, without using his name. Trump has hammered Barry frequently for his stubborn refusal to use the "radical Islam" term.  Barry said that The United States has to make it harder for people who want to kill Americans to get their hands on the weapons of war that allow innocent people to be slaughtered, such as what happened early Sunday morning at the Pulse nightclub in Orlando.  Weapons of war?  Now that’s simply proof that Barry continues to see the right of Americans to keep and bear arms as being the bigger threat.

Barry said, "We cannot prevent every tragedy."  And then proceeded to revert to what has become the common theme heard from Democrats when he said, "We know that consistent with the Second Amendment. There are common sense steps that could reduce gun violence and the lethality of somebody intense to do somebody harm."  So, I guess, it just makes more sense to make even more people vulnerable to such attacks.  Imagine if there had been just one individual in that club in legal possession of a gun, how differently might things have turned out?  How many lives might have been saved?

Barry claimed that it's not enough to just talk about being tough on terrorists, but the nation also needs to "stop making it as easy as possible for terrorists to buy assault weapons.  Reinstate this weapons ban and make it harder for terrorists to use these weapons to kill us."  For one thing, the weapon used WAS NOT an assault weapon.  And what Barry is banking on here is the fact that very few people will bother to take the time to check out why it was that the ‘ban on assault weapons’ was allowed to expire.  It was because it had no effect.  It’s was, like now, nothing but pure politics.

Meanwhile, Hitlery Clinton, speaking to supporters in Pittsburgh, said that Trump's proposal bolstered her case that he is essentially temperamentally unfit to serve as president.  And I thought it pretty hilarious, especially after watching how Barry has approached the job for the last 7+ years, when Hitlery said Commander-in-chief "is a job that demands a calm, collected and dignified response" to events like the Orlando massacre early on Sunday.  That’s not exactly how I would describe how Barry has responded to such events.  But then, I’m not a limp-wristed Democrat.

Hitlery also noted that Trump seemed to suggest on Monday in a television interview that Barry might have somehow been responsible for the deadliest mass shooting in modern U.S. history, a point that Trump said he did not make.  She said, "I have to ask: Will responsible Republican leaders stand up to their presumptive nominee or will they stand by his accusation about our president?"  While we can’t say that Barry was in any way directly responsible, what we can say, and should say, is that his actions and words have most certainly continued to encourage such violence!

So let’s see, the F.B.I. doesn't have the resources to stop terrorists, and at the same time it’s seen as a bad idea to allow the general population to arm themselves?  And then, calling Muslims who literally despise the United States what they are will not accomplish anything?  Maybe when the Muslims become "bitter clingers", Barry will be better able to bring himself to do what is supposed to be his most important job: to protect America and her citizens.  But then, if there is one thing that Barry has made quite clear it that he has virtually no interest in doing so.

An additional point that I think worth mentioning, is that while the FBI may not have had enough information to arrest this shooter after investigating and even interrogating him on three separate occasions over the last three years, but they certainly had enough to flag him should he apply for a purchase of a firearm.  So why was the "ok to sell" given when he went to buy the guns?  I suspect that it was because of his religious declaration as a Muslim and this administration's position that no one who declares the Islamic faith shall be in any way deprived of any rights, including that of buying a weapon.

No, Barry it will not alter the ‘terrorist’s war’ on the West, but what it will do, is to go some distance in convincing the American people that you are on OUR SIDE.  And by OUR SIDE, I mean the RIGHT SIDE. The side of righteousness and of life and liberty.  Those, Mr. President, whom it is your primary job to protect and to keep safe to the greatest extent possible.  For once, Mr. President, think of someone other than yourself, think about America and what’s best for her and her citizens when it comes to combating those who wish nothing more than to kill Americans.

While Barry’s logic here appears to be rather odd to me, to say the least, it certainly comes as no surprise. If not using a certain name doesn't change anything (implying a lack of importance), then why work so hard to not use it?  Why not say it and be done with it?  Call it what it is. This whole speech demonstrates the very opposite of the point he pretends to make.  Clearly there is a great deal of weight to the phrase "Islamic terrorist" or Barry wouldn't be as determined as he is not to use it.  Barry’s constant reply is when he asks, “What would that accomplish? “

And another thing, it might finally start making people in America at least begin to think that he’s doing actually everything that he can to protect the American people instead of busying yourself raising money for a very corrupt Democrat Party or taking extended, and rather costly, vacations for him and his family on the American people’s dime.  Also, it may also convince those of us who have come to believe that he’s more than just a little incompetent and derelict in his duties as president, that maybe he’s not quite as fucked up as we think.  Either way, it’s up to him.

We really do need, as president, someone who’s going to do more than pussyfoot around the topic of Islam and finally put the safety of the American people on the top of his ’To Do’ list.  Our desire to remain politically correct is killing us, literally.  In choosing to side with a violent religious cult responsible the death of millions of people over the last 1400 years instead of with American people would seem to indicate that Barry is either a fool or a member of the cult.  And apparently the same can be said of the Democrat candidate now vying for his job.  America needs to be careful this November, very careful.

JIMMY CLYBURN…ALL THE BRAINS OF AN ICE CUBE…

In the wake of the terrorist attack in Orlando by a man who pledged his allegiance to ISIS, Democrat Rep. Jimmy Clyburn, and perennial moron, said, “This is not about ISIS. … this is about guns in America and whether or not we’re going to have some kind of moderation to this Second Amendment.”  Appearing on “MSNBC Live” with Tamron Hall on Tuesday, old Jimmy went on to say, “If you’re on the no-fly list, you ought not be able to buy a gun. … The same thing is true of people convicted of hate crimes. We ought not allow them to buy guns. This gentleman, it is now being revealed, had a lot of hate, and it seems that some of it was self-hate.”

Jimmy said, “And consequently this is not about ISIS, this is not about any kind of foreign terror. This is about guns in America and whether or not we’re going to have some kind of moderation to this Second Amendment just as we have to the First Amendment.”  And he added, “None of us believe that our First Amendment rights are unfettered and that’s why the Supreme Court said you are not going to be allowed to yell ‘fire’ in a crowded theater. Now, the same kind of moderation ought to be on this Second Amendment.”  He said “Yes, you can buy a firearm, but let’s have a reasonable background check that is completed before you’re allowed to do so.”

Look, this idiot Clyburn is like a barking dog – he doesn't know why he's barking, he just does.  Seriously, what kind of background check is there, that would be any different than what we have now, that would have stopped this murdering raghead?  Clyburn is definitely several years beyond his natural retirement age.  He seems to ignore the fact that the guy was a licensed security officer and that he had undergone and passed the most rigorous of background investigations. If I didn't know better I'd think Clyburn was deflecting so we don't notice the man was gay and had murdered a whole bunch of people in a gay night club.

You know, if we go by Liberal logic then we should ban cars because people have used them to commit mass homicide by running people over on sidewalks (Santa Monica Farmers Market, Venice Boardwalk, Las Vegas Strip). We should get rid of knives because people have used them to murder other people.  And let us not forget about the 9/11 hijackers who used jumbo jets to slaughter thousands of innocent people -- better get rid of those dangerous airplanes, never mind the box-cutters. But then I guess those would fall under the ban on knives. And what about rope? There were those fellas down in Texas who dragged a man to death at the end of a rope! Gotta get rid of rope. And the list goes on and on...

Democrats, they simply can't comprehend that it's the murderer and his motives (Jihad, anyone?), not the tool he uses to murder, that's the problem.  So in an attempt to keep things simple enough so that even old Jimmy and his cadre of scumbag Democrats might be able to keep up, what follows is the simple definition of terrorism per Merriam-Webster is: "the use of violent acts to frighten the people in an area as a way of trying to achieve a political goal."  Now in an effort to take things just step further what I listed here are the facts that one has to believe in order to support the lunacy that is the Democrat narrative:

Being Black = a race.

Being Muslim = a race.

Being White = An ideological motive to enslave others, not merely a race.

Shooting a gun while being white = an act of terrorism.

Acknowledging black on black crime as a problem = racism.

Acknowledging Radical Islamists as a problem = racism.

Finally, the solution to stop all of this homegrown, white terrorism = ban all legal guns.  And there you have it.

In reality what we have regarding this latest tragedy is nothing more than the typical manufactured outrage that we get from scum like Jimmy, all in order to scare people into accepting an anti-Second Amendment agenda.  Wait a second, that kind of sounds like TERRORISM!  Liberalism is thinking you can't round up 30 million illegals but you can round up 300 million guns.  Liberalism is thinking some of the 30,000 emails Hillary deleted from her private e-mail server had nothing to do with the Clinton Foundation, which is illegal and a conflict of interest.  But hey, she’s a Democrat to there’s no there, there.  Nothing to see here move along, move along.

HITLERY CLINTON…A DISASTER WAITING TO BE ELECTED???

It was on this past Monday that, singing the same old song that we have heard coming from her and her ilk for what seems like forever, Hitlery Clinton, the presumptive Democrat nominee for president, used a terrorist attack to call for what Democrats see as being THE cure for these kinds of attacks.  That being, of course, increased gun control. She actually used the deaths of 49 patrons (excluding the shooter) of the Orlando gay nightclub, Pulse, in order to call for stricter gun laws, despite the fact that her ‘suggestions’ would not have played any role in stopping Sunday's attack.

Hitlery once again decried the popular AR-15 rifle as a "weapon of war" and called for more background checks, just like the one the Orlando terrorist passed, for gun buyers.  And it was in speaking on the day after Omar Mateen shot and killed 49 people in Orlando that Hitlery said, "I believe weapons of war have no place on our streets."  She then tried to portray her other proposals as being commonsense and strictly non-partisan.  She said, "If the FBI is watching you for suspected terrorist links, you shouldn't be able to just go buy a gun with no questions asked."

And yet the owner of the Florida gun shop that sold Mateen the rifle and handgun said he ran a full background check before selling the firearms, noting that nothing had come up to warn against the sale. That would mean questions were asked.  The FBI has admitted they looked into Mateen twice - in 2013 and 2014 but found no reason to charge him and closed the case.  Hitlery also raised the prospect of online and gun show sales, neither of which apply to this situation.  It’s amazing to me that more people are unable to recognize Democrats for the sleaze that they are.

Liberals, as nearly everybody knows, have no real ideology except hatred for freedom and coveting what that which is not theirs.  The Left's desire to flood this nation with illegal immigrants and Muslims terrorists is far more dangerous than their lack of moral behavior.  Meanwhile BLM and Muslim "victims" attack the very fabric of our moral society!  Do you think that the Muslims will care about Christian religious liberty? Freedom of Speech?  The 2nd Amendment?  Nope, these are the Democrats’ allies, at least for now, in the effort to destroy our country. 

Much to the chagrin of the Democrat Party, it is our Constitutional right to own a firearm and one we may very well need to exercise on a much more critical level before all is said and done here and for the purpose of defending that very same Constitution from a government which seems to grow a bit more out of control with each passing day.  Barry, Hitlery, and Democrats in general, are every bit a detriment and enemy to our constitutional free Republic as are the Omar Mateen’s of the world.  In fact, dare I say, it’s often times that they appear to be on the very same side.

Which is why whatever unconstitutional legislation they create and attempt to force upon us that would further inhibits The People's 2nd amendment rights must be completely and utterly ignored by the true patriots of this country.  Rather than appropriately deal with them, their apparent objective here would, at least, seem to be to render us as defenseless as possible against killer Muslim terrorists and common criminals alike, as well as forced submission to our very own government.  Might they also, inevitably, have agendas such as martial law on its mind?

In that Hitlery seems to be more than a bit confused or, as is usually case, she is simply being dishonest.  Just for the record I would like to take the time to point out to her that a weapon of war is a weapon like the M-16, M-4, M-60, AK-47. Ones that can fire both on semi and automatic. The online and gun shows are not the problem. It's that car trunk buying in the alley loophole that’s the real problem. The more Barry, Hitlery and the rest of the Democrat's keep shooting your big mouths off about gun control the more gun sales go up.  Barry’s been the greatest gun salesman in history!

OBAMA…ISLAM’S MAN ON THE INSIDE???

If there is one thing that we have been witness to over the course of the last 7+ years, and will likely be throughout the next 220 days, it’s how our ‘Fearless Leader, our ‘Dear Beloved Leader’, ‘The One We Had Been Waiting For’, Barack Hussein Obama, is never, and I do mean NEVER, to be blamed for absolutely ANYTHING.  So while he sees it as being quite appropriate to take credit for an economy which he claims is doing so much better than it really is, better than it has in decades, he cannot be blamed in any way, shape, manner or form, nor should he be, for the continuing string of violent terror attacks that have taken place in this country, the most recent one in Orlando, that have taken place on his watch.

And this time around while refraining from simply blaming Bush, as has been his typical mantra since day one of his prancing his cool self into the Oval Office, Barry still couldn’t bring himself to accept any level of responsibility for the recent, and very deadly, terrorist attack in Florida.  Instead, this time around Barry set his sights on those stingy/racist Republicans in Congress.  Because according to Barry, it’s all their fault for “underfunding” his efforts to combat these violent extremists.  You see, it’s in that way that he’s able to absolve himself of any and all responsibility, or associated guilt, while at the same time implicating his opposition regarding the resulting carnage of such attacks as the one at an Orlando gay nightclub. 

And so it was during the press briefing earlier today that the White house Spokesmoron, Josh Earnest, said, “The president’s been quite disappointed that Congress, Republicans in Congress have underfunded our countering violent extremism efforts.” Earnest was, I guess, attempting to make the point that Barry had requested an increase in the budget.  Earnest complained that Republicans wouldn’t even speak with Barry “Almighty’s” budget director to discuss budget increases.  He said, “Republicans have not fulfilled their responsibility to do everything that is necessary to protect the country from violent extremism.”  He added, “It’s time for them to step up to the plate and do their job.” 

Republicans handed to Barry a $1.1 Trillion, and now he whines about needing spending increases?  And at the same time Earnest urged Americans to “take great confidence” in both the law enforcement professionals to keep them safe, but also in Barry’s leadership.  Barry’s leadership?  Come on, he’s kidding right?  And then Earnest proceeded to tell the biggest whopper of the day when he said, “They have a president of the United States who has made his No. 1 priority protecting our homeland, and our federal government expends significant resources in pursuit of that goal.”  And he added, “And that’s something that should give the American people great confidence to go on with their lives.”  Geez, gag me with a spoon!

I must admit, however, that I am more than a bit puzzled by Earnest’s claim.  Because it’s been Ryan, and Boehner before him, who along with any number of other RINO lapdogs have paid, courtesy of the $1.1 Trillion that I mentioned earlier, for everything that Barry has said he’s wanted.  The Republicans have essentially been in charge of the budgetary process since 2011 and therefore have just as big a role as Barry in allowing the national debt to balloon to nearly $20 Trillion. Or enough to effectively double the US government debt during Barry’s eight years in the Oval office. How much more cash, exactly, does Barry think he needs, or needed, to get the job done?  You’d think Barry was barely able to make ends meet.

Let’s face it, it’s been Barry and his band of pinheads over at the White House who has been behind the throwing wide open of our borders. As well as for the appeasing of any number of various Islamic groups, going around Congress in an effort to move forward their leftist agenda and spending assets on shortcut process to bring in thousands of unassimilated people from every third world hellhole that have absolutely nothing in common with a free society.  This country needs a giant enema to flush as many of these Islamist enablers out of office as possible.  But I’m not all that confident that the American people are sufficiently bright enough to be able to recognize what needs to be done, nor have the courage to do it if they were.

Look, it was upon entering office that Barry made a promise to the American people, well actually two.  One was he promised that his administration would be the most transparent administration in history and he promised change.  And it was under the guise of change that Barry stated his mission was to “fundamentally transform” the United States of America.  And what we got has been the most secretive administration since the day of Richard Nixon, and an America in 2016 that bears little resemblance to the America of 2008.  Barry has been permitted to go unchallenged regarding his need to be secretive and allowed to transform this nation from a prosperous one to one little better than your average third world country.