Now while I freely admit that I am someone who could
not even remotely be said to resemble a ‘political expert’, it would seem somewhat
obvious even to my woefully untrained journalistic eye that it would be a
relatively simple task to poke what I think would be more than a few, and
pretty sizable, holes into the presidential aspirations of one Hitlery
Clinton. All that would be really
required is that one have the gonads to go after her. But as we know what used to be referred to as
the ‘mainstream media’ has long been dead having become replaced with something
that more closely resembles a modern day state-controlled media.
But sticking point and the one missing primary
ingredient required for the poking of said holes would, of course, be a bona
fide national media. The same media of
which it can be that has been MIA over the course of at least the last 7 or 8
years. I mean there are any number of
questions that “real” journalists could ask Hitlery, except she will never –
ever – expose herself to a real journalist.
She will stay well hidden and talk only to chosen few Democrat
transcriptionists who have distinguished themselves via sycophancy above and
beyond the call of duty. So we need to
detonate the narrative by asking the tough questions ourselves.
I suppose, in a way, for many folks it’s all rather
difficult to have to admit the fact that the Clintons pretty much destroy pretty
much everything they get their grubby hands on, and the old idea of journalism
is just one more casualty that has come about as a result of their never ending
quest for ever more power. These days
it’s at least half of the mainstream media has, at one time or another, worked
for the Clintons, or is married to someone who did, and the other half would
happily do so. There was not much that
journalists would not do for ‘Slick Willie’ – and please, we do not want to
know what they would do for Hitlery.
I also suppose, and I’m only assuming here, that a
real journalist, if there were any left today, might first want to start with
some of the rather glaring omissions in her hilarious campaign bio. What’s funny isn’t the content but the sheer
cynicism that underlies it. It’s not
even a series of lies – it’s an alternate reality. So, since journalists have no interest in
digging for the truth, unless, of course, that ‘truth’ is said to involve
someone with an (R) after their name, dare I be so bold as to suggest a few questions
of my own just on the off-chance any of these supposed journalists might wish to
do that which their profession demands.
Questions such as:
“Mrs. Clinton – you are still going by ‘Mrs.
Clinton, right? – your bio states that ‘After law school, Hillary chose not to
go to a big New York or Washington law firm.’
Didn’t you fail the Washington, D.C., bar exam?”
“How did you manage to fail the D.C. bar exam, the
easiest of all bar exams? Did you not
have a pulse?”
“Your bio notes that you ‘serv[ed] as a lawyer for
the Congressional Committee investigating President Nixon.’ Did you leave that job voluntarily, or were
you fired by its Democrat lead investigator for grossly unethical
conduct?”
“When you moved to Arkansas, you were hired by the
state’s most prestigious firm. Can you
tell us any reason why the Rose Law Firm would hire a woman who had flunked the
D.C. bar exam other than that her husband was governor?”
“You are making breaking the so-called ‘glass
ceiling’ a key part of your campaign. Do
you think you’ve any broken barriers on your own, or only because you married
Bill Clinton?”
“Would you be here right now if you were not the
wife of a former president?”
“Your bio leaps from a 1995 speech in China to your
2000 election as New York Senator. Why
did you not discuss Bill’s second term?”
“Did your husband lie to the American people about
Monica Lewinsky? If he did, why did you
support him?”
“You defended your husband Bill Clinton when he was
impeached for perjury. Under what
circumstances do you consider it acceptable for a president to violate the law
without being removed from office?”
“Your husband was a serial adulterer. Do you agree that he brought great shame on
the office and distracted the country from serious business? How can you reassure the American people that
Bill Clinton’s sexual escapades will not overshadow your presidency?”
“Do you believe women who make accusations of sexual
abuse should be listened to and treated with respect? How do you square that with the vicious
treatment of women abused by Bill Clinton?”
“Do you think America’s enemies like Putin and the
mullahs will see you as weak for your inability to stop your husband’s serial
cuckolding of you?”
“You served as a New York Senator for eight
years. Your bio talks about some
initiatives to rebuild after 9/11 and to assist rural New York. What was your greatest achievement as a New
York Senator?”
“Your bio does not mention that you voted for the
war in Iraq. Why not?”
“Is it your position that George W. Bush tricked you
into voting for the Iraq war? Doesn’t
that raise legitimate questions able whether you are too gullible to be
president?”
“Your bio says that, as Secretary of State, you were
‘instrumental in starting to restore America’s standing in the world.’ Name one region of the world where America’s
standing is greater today than when George W. Bush left office.”
“What was your greatest achievement as Secretary of
State?”
“Has Barack Obama been a good president? What programs of his will you
discontinue?”
“Do you agree with Obama’s use of executive orders
when Congress will not go along with his plans?
Will you recognize a GOP president’s authority to impose conservative
initiatives without going through Congress?”
“What, if anything, would you change about Obamacare
in light of Obama and Gruber’s outright lies when attempting to pass it?”
“When the mullahs in Iran call out ‘Death to
America,’ do you believe that they mean it?”
“When the mullahs in Iran call for the destruction
of Israel, do you believe that they are serious about destroying Israel?”
“If Iran obtained nuclear weapons, what do you
believe is the percentage chance of the Iranians using nuclear weapons against
Israel? 1%? 5%? 25%?
100%?”
“If you learned that Israel intended to strike Iran
to eliminate its nuclear program, would you try to persuade it not to
strike? If unsuccessful, would you warn
Iran? Would you order American forces to
stop the Israeli strike with force?”
“If Iran struck Israel with nuclear weapons, would
you order an American nuclear attack on Iran in retaliation?”
“If ISIS cannot be defeated without the use of a
major American ground war, would you choose the ground war or will you accept
the existence of the so-called Islamic State?”
“Recently, Democrat leader Debbie Wasserman-Schultz
gave the impression that she opposes any limit on abortions. Can you clarify – what is the last day of a
nine-month pregnancy that you believe an abortion should be legal?”
“Do you believe that it should be legal to abort a
baby who could live outside the womb?”
“Do you believe abortions should be legal where the
mother wants to select the sex of the baby, or where she believes the baby
might be genetically predisposed to be gay?”
“Do you believe that able-bodied people should ever
be given any form of welfare?”
“Do you believe that illegal aliens should ever be
given any form of welfare?”
“Are conservatives bad people?”
“Looking at a map, the coasts are blue and the
interior of the United States is red.
Why are you the right person to repair the polarization in the American
electorate?”
“What will you do when red state governors announce
you have overstepped your authority on some issue like guns, the environment or
religious protections, and that they will refuse to allow you to enforce it in
their states? Will you use armed force
against fellow Americans who defy your will?”
So there you have it, a series of very simple, basic
and straight forward questions, that if asked in the proper venue might
actually result in the shortest presidential campaign in our history. Hence the reason Hitlery knows full well that
no one will be asking them. That despite
the fact that the media guy, or gal, who were to ask ANY of these questions
could very well make for themselves quite the reputation as an actual
journalist instead of aspiring to be one more in what has become an army of smarmy,
mush-mouthed, limp-wristed journalistic wannabes. But Hitlery can be comfortable in that fact
that that is what our mainstream media has now become.
But in this age of technology and social media, I
would argue that we no longer really need the networks and newspapers in order to
get the truth out. All that’s necessary
is just one intrepid citizen and a cellphone camera in the right place at the
right time poised to catch Hitlery’s response to any one of these questions and
the truth will finally be set free. The
truth is we no longer really NEED the media to what all of us once thought of
as being its job. You know, the watchdog
of freedom and the guardian of democracy.
And now when the stakes could not be higher, a Hitlery Clinton
presidency could most assuredly bring about the end of America.
No comments:
Post a Comment