OBAMA FEELING PICKED ON BY THE MEDIA…NO JOKE…

For a guy who’s been treated pretty much with kid gloves since first arriving on scene, I thought it strange to hear how Barry’ been complaining about how he’s continually being picked on by those who comprise the lion’s share of those in the state-controlled media.  Because in their effort to keep the wagons tightly circled around their hero Barry, our state-controlled media complex has become more like Barry’s lap dog than the people’s watchdog which it was originally intended to be.

So it was then that while speaking with a group of college journalists, just past Thursday, Barry “Almighty was heard complaining about how he’s "picked on" by the media.  Along with his spokesmoron Josh Earnest, Barry talked about the "pokes and prods" he has suffered at the hands of the press.  Barry said, “Sometimes both Josh and I probably have our disagreements with the press corps and feel picked on and misunderstood.”  He can’t be serious??  Can he??

Anyway Barry went on to say, “But the truth of the matter is, and I’ve said this before, what separates us out in part from a lot of other countries in the world is we’ve got this incredible free press that pokes and prods and calls into account our leaders.”  What the Hell is this moron talking about?  When exactly has ANYONE in the press, other than perhaps Fox News, EVER actually held this boob accountable for anything?  And the answer to that is, never.  They just makes excuses for him.

Barry went on to complain about how hard it is to get "good" stories placed. He told these ‘journalists’, “It is very hard to get good stories placed.”  And he went on to say, “People will assign you stories about what’s not working. It’s very hard for you to write a story about, ‘Wow, this thing really works good.'”  Well, maybe if this boob was ever responsible for something really working we’d hear about it.  But, unfortunately for us, everything he touches simply turns to shit!

He also suggested the media needs to help make people less cynical.  He said, “One of the things we have to think about is how do we tell a story about the things we do together that actually work so that people don’t feel so cynical overall.”  Look, the fact is that the vast majority of those who are part of the state-controlled media spend so much time trying to convince us that those things that aren’t working, really are working that people can’t help but to become cynical.

Now if Barry were ever to be treated as if he were a Republican maybe then he’d have something to whine about. For instance, if there were nightly stories about the cancer victims and others with life threatening conditions, with an emphasis on women and children, who are being turned away from hospitals and treatment centers because of Obamascare.  Stories of what a cruel and heartless man Barry is for making them die would be on an hourly news cycle.

Or the families of the Benghazi victims would be asked why their loved ones had to die for no other reason than so Barry could be reelected, like what Cindy Sheehan did when George Bush was in office. All the relatives of the victims of Fast and Furious would be interviewed nightly and asked why it was that they thought Barry had sent guns to the drug cartels. There would questions about the vets that died waiting for treatment that died because of Barry’s policies.

Maybe the IRS email scandal wouldn’t be a source of humor on the nightly news. Instead questions about the subpoenaed documents yet to be released would be the only ones asked at every White House press conference. And there’d be questions regarding why the president felt the need for an enemies list. There would be daily calls for his impeachment on all the broad cast networks and news cable shows for Fast and Furious, Benghazi, IRS, VA, NSA and the daily rewrite of Obamacare.

The bottom line here is that our wonderfully unbiased state-controlled media has bent over backwards in their constant attempt to provide cover for Barry ever since before he was elected.  And that’s despite the fact that Barry has done more, and gotten away with more, than Nixon ever did, or even thought about doing.  The press, which was the driving for behind Watergate, has continued to provide to him a free ride.  And yet Barry still feels the need to whine about being picked on?

OBAMA: CRAPPY ECONOMY IS NOT MY FAULT!!!

Come on people, if there this is one thing we know about our current Douche Bag-in-Chief, Barry O’Bummer, it’s that this limp-wristed piece of dog squeeze takes responsibility for absolutely nothing.  So why should any of us be at all surprised to hear that he now sees himself being in no way responsible for the fact that there has been nothing that could even remotely be called an economic recovery that has taken place at any point during his presidency.  So instead of reacting to a recent report regarding the weak economic growth in the first quarter of 2016 in a responsible, and adult, manner all he does is to blame the Republicans.

And so it was then that in very typical fashion that we heard from presidential spokesmoron Josh Earnest as he did his absolute best in an effort to defend the complete insanity that has taken place over the last 7+ years.  Earnest said, "The president has spent years making the case to Republicans in Congress that there is more that could be done that would strengthen our economy, expand economic opportunity for the middle class and lay a foundation for our nation's long-term strength for the decades ahead."  And I thought Jay Carney was a lying piece of crap, but Earnest makes ‘him’ look almost honest.  Almost, that is!

And Earnest went on to say, "And that includes investment in infrastructure. You know, the president is quoted in a story today talking about how, frankly, the United States missed an opportunity over the last couple of years to make critical investments in infrastructure while interest rates were low, while the construction sector was not as strong as it previously was. And it's unfortunate that years have gone by where that opportunity has been missed."  Personally, I thought the TARP money was supposed to go to shovel ready infrastructure projects, if so why are we still taking about “investing” in improving our infrastructure?

Earnest once again made his pitch that the real reason for the missed opportunity "was because of Republicans' stubborn refusal to consider any priority that President Obama has identified."   And as to be expected Earnest also mentioned Republicans' failure to raise the minimum wage, which "certainly would bring more fairness to our economy" and help grow it "from the middle out."  Anyone with a brain realizes that raising the minimum wage would cause even more people to be out of work.  But the bright side of that, at least if you’re a Democrat, those folks would then likely become dependent upon government, which is really Barry’s goal.

As was reported on Thursday, the United States has started 2016 with a record tenth-straight first quarter in which real GDP grew at an annual rate of less than 3 percent, according to the “advance” estimate of first quarter GDP published by the Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA).  The BEA’s advance estimate of real GDP for the first quarter of 2016 showed real GDP growing at an annual rate of 0.5 percent.  Now Barry would have actually had something to brag about, economically speaking, had he decided to follow the example set by Reagan.  Reagan, you may or may not recall, ended up with a real annual growth rate in the GDP of 3.5 percent.

Earnest was asked: "Are you saying that the growth rate as it stood in the first quarter is an indirect result of Republicans failing to go along with infrastructure, increased spending for infrastructure, minimum wage increases?"  To which Earnest replied, "There is no denying that there are a wide variety of economic indicators that would be stronger if Republicans in Congress had seized the initiative three or four years ago and made a critical investment in our infrastructure."  What there’s no denying of is the fact that the economic policies which Barry has put into place have had exactly the result that he intended them to have.

Earnest said, "So I would hesitate to draw a line between one spending proposal and one economic indicator, but there's no denying that the longer-term trends would be even better than they already are if Republicans had followed the president's advice.”  He added, "Fortunately, there are some things that we were able to do without strong Republican support, things like the Recovery Act and the Affordable Care Act and Wall Street reform, all of which did have positive benefits for our economy that we continue to enjoy. The vast majority -- those things were passed even though the vast majority Republicans who were in office at the time opposed them.”

Earnest said, "And you know, we continue to look for additional ways to strengthen our economy, even in the face of unprecedented Republican obstruction in Congress." Earnest pointed to other economic indicators that Barry feels good about, including jobs.  He said, "Obviously the numbers that we're most attuned to are the jobs numbers and, you know, the U.S. economy is currently on the longest streak of private-sector job growth in our nation’s history. 73 consecutive months for a total of 14.4 million private-sector jobs. That's a -- that's a remarkable streak and demonstrates the resilience of the U.S. economy."

Earnest may choose to brag about these supposed 14.4 million private-sector jobs that he ‘claims’ have been created, but what he so very conveniently leaves out of the conversation is the fact that the vast majority of those jobs are only part time.  Many Americans who are seeking full time employment have had to settle for working one, or perhaps more than one, part time jobs simply to make ends meet in Barry’s economy.  But you won’t hear that from Barry, or for that matter, any of his many minions in the state controlled media.  It’s kind of the dirty little secret that’s never talked about in an effort to hoodwink the American people. 

Now it has also been previously reported, and on numerous occasions, that, yes, the unemployment number is low, but so is the labor force participation rate.  Last month we had 93,688,000 Americans who were no longer in the labor force, and only 62.9 percent of the civilian noninstitutional population either held a job or actively sought one during the month of March.  And it hasn’t been that low since the days of Jimmy Carter.  So essentially the much ballyhooed unemployment number is really nothing more than a work of governmental fiction. It’s now a number that has become totally meaningless because it’s based only on seriously flawed data.

So what we have here is Barry ending his presidency essentially right where he was when it began on that fateful day in January 2009.  He started his first term by blaming George W. Bush and it would at least appear that he intends to end his second term also blaming Bush.  Which pretty much sums up his entire presidency where we never once saw him take actually responsibility for anything.  And sadly we’ve been forced to watch as the Democrats have not so gradually been working very hard to dismantle the nation and to fundamentally reform it.  And it has been Barry leading the charge in that endeavor. 

OBAMA, THE ECONOMIC GENIUS OF HIS TIME…

If I remember correctly it wasn’t all that long ago that I seem to recall Hitlery declaring that our economy ALWAYS does better whenever there is a Democrat in the White House.  However, for her to make such a claim, especially after having had Barry in the White House for 7 long years, would seem to require a special kind of arrogance, to say the least.  But then, that should come as no surprise.

But, ya know, to hear Barry tell it, as he recently did in boasting of his economic legacy to the New York Times, he’s nothing short of a genius. Barry implied that his management of the economy has been nothing short of masterful and asserted that it was likely the best in modern history.  Wow, talk about blowing your own horn.  But knowing Barry we do it’s this kind of talk that we have come to expect.

Barry said, “I actually compare our economic performance to how, historically, countries that have wrenching financial crises perform.”  And then of course he went on to say, “By that measure, we probably managed this better than any large economy on Earth in modern history.”  And what’s the most amazing thing of here, is that Barry was able to keep a straight face while making such wild claims.

But oddly enough, it’s for some peculiar reason that the financial headlines just this morning seem paint quite the different story.  Imagine that?  You see, apparently the U.S. economy grew only 0.5 percent in the first quarter of 2016, and that would be the slowest pace in two years.  And it’s all thanks to Barry’s rather masterful management skills I assume?  Or can it all be blamed on George Bush?

Barry also signaled that he was somewhat discouraged that the state controlled media as well as the American people fail to appreciate all that he has claims to have done, and continues to do, to save our economy.  Well gee, how dare we be so unappreciative?  He told the Times, “We were moving so fast early on that we couldn’t take victory laps. We couldn’t explain everything we were doing.”

Barry appeared more than a little irritated by the suggestion from Republicans that the economy has continued to suffer under his administration.  He said, “I mean, the truth of the matter is that if we had been able to more effectively communicate all the steps we had taken to the swing voter, then we might have maintained a majority in the House or the Senate.”  In other words, if better lies had been told.

Look, it would be far from difficult to list here all of the indicators that make it clear just what an economic mess our country is, but I’m sure most informed people are already aware of how many folks are no longer in the workforce, how many millions more are now on food stamps, or some other form of government assistance.  To say nothing of the $10 Trillion of additional debt that Barry had racked up.

But such numbers do not, or should not, in any way reflect what a truly booming economy should look like, by any stretch of the imagination.  Our economy is nothing short of a disaster, and trying to describe it as being anything other than that is to simply defy reality!  But like everything else, Barry seems to think that simply by his claiming that the economy is booming, the rest of us will see it that way.

Today the Commerce Department announced that the US economy expanded at the slowest pace in two years. Our GDP growth rose at an anemic 0.5% rate after a paltry 1.4% fourth quarter advance.  Keep in in mind that Ronald Reagan brought forth an annual real GDP growth of 3.5%.  Barry will be lucky to average a 1.55% GDP growth rate.  This ranks Barry’s as the fourth worst presidency on record.

Barry will be the only U.S. president in history who did not deliver a single year of 3.0%+ economic growth.  And it’s according to Louis Woodhill that if the economy continues to perform below 2.67% GDP growth rate this year, Barry will leave office with the fourth worst economic record in US history.  And yet it’s the same policies that have gotten us to this point that Hitlery wants to continue if elected.  

HITLERY AND THE PLAYING OF THE “WOMAN CARD”…

Again, let me start by saying that I have not yet been convinced to jump onboard the ‘Trump Train’, however, but I must admit that am moving slowly toward the door of the train station that would make it possible.  And yes, I’m fully aware of Mr. Trump’s past transgressions, how could I not be, since those who profess themselves to be the guardians of conservativism have been nearly relentless in their effort to convince me that above all else I need to turn around before ever getting to the platform where I could, if so inclined, jump onboard the ‘T-Train’.  I am told that I must resist such temptation at all costs.

And also the purpose of what I am about to say here is not, in any way, some attempt, covert or otherwise, on my part to come rushing to the defense of ‘The Donald’ because, as we have seen on any number of previous occasions, he has demonstrated that he is more than capable of defending himself.  Trump’s most recent ‘controversy’, as you have most likely heard about by now, has to do with the fact that he dared to declare that Hitlery has but one card to play in her political deck, and that would be, of course, the "woman card."  And she has shown little reluctance in playing it over and over and over again.

So it was then that after racking up victories in five primaries just this past Tuesday, Trump addressed a crowd of gleeful supporters and did what he does best and that was to unapologetically mock the living daylights out of Hitlery.  Trump said to his supporters, "Frankly, if Hillary Clinton were a man, I don't think she'd get 5 percent of the vote. The only thing she's got going is the women's card." He went on to say, "And the beautiful thing is, women don't like her."  And for the life of me I have to figure out why is it that any self-respecting woman would ever choose to vote for someone like Hitlery?  And yet…they do.    

And it was then, early on Wednesday morning, that ‘Team Hitlery’ issued what I’m sure was something they thought was a rather pithy retort to Trump’s claim, releasing footage online of Hitlery embracing the "woman card" describing it as a fight for equal rights.  Hitlery said, "Mr. Trump accused me of playing the 'woman card.' Well if fighting for women's health care and paid family leave and equal pay is playing the 'woman card,' then deal me in.'"  So says the ‘woman’ who did her very best to slander, in every way imaginable, those women who fell prey to her rapist husband. The ‘woman card’ in this case may be nothing but a Joker.

And true to form, Trump has not chosen to back down from his recent statements.  It was during a recent appearance on ‘Good Morning America’ that Trump was asked if he understood why some might find his statement sexist, and he made it quite clear that he had no apologies. He simply said, "It's not sexist. It's true. It's just a very, very true statement. If she were a man, she'd get 5 percent. She's a bad candidate. She's a flawed candidate." And he then went on to say, "She's not going to do very well in the election, and I look forward to showing that."  So while you could argue he was rather blunt, nothing he said was actually incorrect.

So I guess my question to all those who seem to now have their panties in a bunch would be, where exactly is it that Trump was wrong in saying what he said?  He’s quite right when he said that Hitlery is playing the "woman card", and the fact is if she was a man she would have been long gone by now, having been easily dispatched by ‘Socialist Bernie.’  She gets a huge pass, from both women and the media, just for being a female, much like Barry got a huge pass for simply being (half) black.  With Hitlery it’s more about her BEING a woman than it is about her being FOR women, which, of course, she most certainly is not!

Hillary plays the "woman card" precisely for the reason that Trump said she does, because it makes her appear as being the "victim" of the evil white male. She wants to be the most powerful leader in the world, yet she hides behind the veil of victimization when it's advantageous to her. "I am woman, hear me whine!  I just poormouth all the time" is her song.  Like I said, if Hitlery was a guy would she have long ago been vanquished by her competition even if that competition was no one other than Bernie because she’s just that bad of a candidate.  But because she’s a woman, she’s allowed to hang around and even be the ‘frontrunner’.

And you know, despite all of the idiotic claims being made by Democrats in general, and Hitlery specifically, the fact is that women do get paid the same as men for doing the same job. Unless of course they happen to work for Hitlery’s campaign or even in Barry’s White House.  However what Hitlery, and Bernie for that matter, conveniently leave out of the entire conversation on this particular issue is that women generally tend to choose lower paying jobs or part time employment and take longer time out of their careers for such things as having children.  Or when they do go into high paying jobs they tend to work fewer hours than men.

Women also don't tend to go into those more dangerous, dirty, and labor intensive well-paying areas of employment. So there’s your wage gap.  Essentially, the bottom line here is that if you want to earn more than men then you’re just going to have man up a bit.  But nope, it’s just so much easier to sit around and whine about it.  That way, like all those mooches seeking a higher minimum wage, you can increase the odds of making more money without really having to work any harder or work more hours.  It’s the progressive way of doing things, more pay for less actual work. So it’s all about nothing.   

If anything, Hitlery takes identity politics to, what can safely be said, a whole new level. The “woman card” is just a way for her to attempt to distract attention away from the numerous failures of her less than illustrious career.   After all, for all her years in ‘public service’ she has very little of substance to show for any of it.  And being a woman does not erase all of the scandals or having behaved like nothing more than a common crook.  It’s sad that elections are so often won because the candidates know that many voters just refuse to see beyond race or gender not beyond to “the content of one's character.”

Lastly, and as kind of a side note, does anyone truly think that someone as unqualified as Barry “Almighty” would have ever been elected, let alone re-elected, if he had been a white guy?  And quite frankly, the ONLY thing that has prevented him for joining the ranks of Andrew Johnson and ‘Slick Willie’ Clinton, the other two impeached Democrat presidents, is the fact that he’s black.  I mean, how dare anyone even consider the possibility of impeaching the first black president whether or not he actually deserves to be?  So he’s been permitted to get away with some of the most egregious behavior ever to be committed by a U.S. president.

I FEAR WE’VE LOST AN ENTIRE GENERATION, MAKING THE FUTURE OF AMERICA LOOK PRETTY DARK….

If a recent Harvard University poll is anywhere near to being accurate, it would seem that the decades of liberal brainwashing that has been taking place in our public schools, and then taken to the next step once students/victims arrive at one of our many so-called institutions of ‘higher learning, is now finally starting to pay off big for the radical left in this country, aka the Democrat Party.  Because it’s according to this poll that 51 percent of young adults between 18-29 reject capitalism, while only 42 percent support it.

According to the report:  "The word 'capitalism' doesn't mean what it used to," said Zach Lustbader, a senior at Harvard involved in conducting the poll, which was published Monday. For those who grew up during the Cold War, capitalism meant freedom from the Soviet Union and other totalitarian regimes. For those who grew up more recently, capitalism has been described to them, primarily by those on the left, as being to blame for a financial crisis from which the global economy still hasn't completely recovered. 

It’s an open question whether young people's attitudes on socialism and capitalism show that they are rejecting free markets as a matter of principle or whether those views are simply an expression of broader frustrations with an economy in which household incomes have been declining for 15 years.  Or might it be, instead, that it’s because they have essentially been force-fed, and on a daily basis, all manner of leftist drivel since their very first day of kindergarten, or in some case even earlier than that, while in pre-school?

And it in the same poll that only 33 percent said they support socialism. One of the pollsters explained the numbers and why "capitalism" has become the equivalent of a dirty word for those in the younger generation.  And even though these millennials aren't as quick to claim the term "socialist" in this poll, they are busy demanding some of its better perks, like many who want health insurance for all, food and shelter given to those who can't afford it, and more government involvement all around.  They obviously have no understanding of unintended consequences.

To this group revealed just how ignorant they truly are when they describe capitalism as being "unfair" and "greedy," and socialism being more "compassionate."  How is it exactly, than any sane person is able to come to the conclusion that Socialism is in any way "compassionate"?  Try going up to a retailer and argue that their prices need to be more compassionate.  And if you’re white, be sure to ask about the privileged discount too.   The old Soviet Union "compassioned" the population right into the house of destitution and misery.

These poll numbers are about as surprising as finding out that it’s this very same group of individual who has largely thrown its support towards "Democratic socialist" Bernie Sanders. Since they are having a hard time with the definitions perhaps they should click here and find out that "Democratic socialist" doesn't mean "compassion"; what it actually means is "dictatorship."  But they won’t, primarily because they prefer not to know, that way it become much easier for them to claim ignorance and to blame their idiocy on others.

And it’s also that 51% of millennials who have no understanding of money, don't understand economics, and most certainly don't understand socialism.  But I suppose we shouldn’t be too hard on them since they are, after all, the very same ones who apparently possess not much of an understanding regarding the basic biology of how to tell the difference between a girl and a boy.  So what should we really expect?  And the sad thing is that there is likely nothing we can say to them they will ever make them realize where it is that they’re headed.

Sure, they will hate Capitalism now, and likely will continue to at least until everyone, including the government, goes completely broke and they’re forced to eat whatever they can instead of their favorite organic and vegetarian food, or having their favorite Starbuck soy latte at a perfect 182 degrees. When they run out of money to buy that crap and have to resort to groveling for their food, it will be then that Capitalism will start to look pretty good. Just ask anyone living in Red China, Cuba or North Korea if they love their lives. 

Look, the level of stupidity in this country has now gotten to point where it’s actually painful.  People forget, or simply don’t care, that it was ‘Slick Willie’s’ changes to the, Jimmy Carter created, Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) along with Janet Reno’s strong-arming of the banks to give mortgages to people who didn't meet even the minimal of requirements that created the 2008 housing/mortgage crisis. The banks may have gone along with the plan, but it was the government that actually caused the crisis, not capitalism.

Capitalism might as well stand for working for a living and accepting responsibility in order to preserve the freedoms you were given at birth. These simpletons actually think they're owed that, as a birthright entitlement.  And after registering to vote they then proceed to vote for communists all of their life without ever understanding anything at all when it comes to what Marxism is.  And after electing people to essentially destroy the economy, from Washington, they then feel free to blame "capitalism" for the collapse.  What a deal.

DEMOCRATS CLAIM THEY ARE SIMPLY TRYING TO SAVE US FROM OURSLEVES…

No matter who it is on the left that you may care to mention, they are all like a dog with a bone as they continue to harp on what remains to be their topic du jour, ‘climate change.’  Other than their recent, and very determined, drive to allow men into women’s restrooms, there’s very little that gets Democrats as worked up.  With each passing day it becomes increasingly obvious that there is literally nothing Democrats will not say in what has become their all-out offensive to instill in us as much fear as possible regarding some mythical apocalypse that a majority of bona fide scientists have told us will, quite simply, never occur.

And so it was again, just last week, on the day before John Kerry-Heinz would sit down to sign the much ballyhooed Paris climate change agreement at the United Nations, that we had yet another leftist Democrat, Jeff Merkley, take to the floor of the Senate, to give a speech on that very topic.  A speech which he described as being his way “to recognize the importance of the signing” of the Paris climate agreement, declaring “global warming is…the moral challenge of our generation.”  So once again we had one of our elected ‘leaders’ spewing what any rational human should be able to recognize, very easily, as pure bullshit.

This particular agreement, as you may recall, was completed back in December in Paris shortly after Muslim terrorists were able to kill 130 people and wound another 368 in that very city.  And it was on first day of this ‘conference’ that Barry made a speech, during which he made the idiotic statement that the meeting would symbolize a global "act of defiance" that proves the world stands undeterred by attacks linked to ISIS in Europe and beyond.  And in proving he’s either terminally naive, or a complete moron, Barry said, "What greater rejection of those who would tear down our world than marshalling our best efforts to save it." 

And it was also in that very same speech that Barry said, "Our nations share a sense of urgency about this challenge and a growing realization that it is within our power to do something about it."  And he would go on to add, "One of the enemies we'll be fighting at this conference is cynicism ... our progress should give us hope during these two weeks."  But it’s not cynicism that’s the real enemy here when it comes to this totally concocted pipedream, the far greater enemy are these purveyors of such blatant dishonesty, who continue in their effort to force this lunacy down the throats of those who refuse to buy into it.

Which brings to last week when what we again saw emanating from right there on the floor of the Senate, in making reference to this idiotic agreement which has the United States joining in with 174 other countries in an effort to control emissions of “greenhouse” gasses, was nothing more than pure leftist propaganda.  This moron, Merkley, said, “This international climate accord is a tremendous step forward.”   However, unlike most Democrats, those of us who choose to live in the real world, what this agreement truly represents is nothing other than a monumental step backwards.  And a Republican president will need to disavow it.

Merkley went on to say, “It makes clear the world recognizes that global warming is a very significant and grave concern facing human civilization on this planet. It is, indeed, the moral challenge of our generation. I am proud and inspired by the global community’s unprecedented commitment to avert global warming, to avert a climate crisis.”  I think it’s more than a stretch to put forward the claim that “the world recognizes” global warming as a supposed threat.  While there is little doubt that the leftist elite do, the vast majority of the common folk are still able see it for what it is, as being nothing more than a huge scam.

Merkley said, “We know what the stakes are,” the senator said. “We don’t need computer models to look 50 years into the future because the impacts are here today. We see it in our own communities. We see it in our own States. We see it through the impact of droughts, the impact of wildfires, the impact of heat waves, the storms, the hurricanes, the tornadoes.” And he added, “We see it through story after story of this year or this month being the warmest ever recorded by humans.”  But the actual scientific data tells us is that there has been no warming that has taken place for over 15 years.  But the leftists refuse to accept it.

Look, it’s according to boobs like Merkley that everything can be tied to climate change.  If I spill my coffee it is directly related to ‘climate change’.  If I trip on a crack in the sidewalk, catch a cold, a bird poops on my car, or if a restaurant screws up my order it all can be directly related to ‘climate change’. And it’s only through a massive expansion of government, funded by unprecedented taxation that we will be able to solve this non-existent problem.  These idiots insist upon focusing on a nonissue while ignoring the truly critical issues of our time. They will destroy our civilization before they give up on their fantasies.

And so it is then that even after global warming, climate change, climate disruption, or whatever nomenclature the Democrats wish to use has clearly been shown to be a scam, we continue to see Democrats working so very hard to convince us that it is something which we truly need to be worried about.  But let’s be real, all of this sound the alarm on the part of Democrats has nothing to do with any genuine concern the left claims to possess regarding the current condition of our climate.  They continue to push it because they view it as providing them with yet another avenue allowing them to worm even further into our lives.

THE WORLD ACCORDING TO OBAMA, PEACEFUL AND PROSPEROUS…WHO KNEW???

So it was while speaking in Germany, just this past Monday, Barry “Almighty” made the rather peculiar claim that we should consider ourselves fortunate to be living in the "most peaceful" era in all of human history.  Now one could reasonably argue that Barry is either suffering from sort of mental disorder causing to choose to remove himself from reality and to take up residence in some sort of weird alterative universe or, he has become completely oblivious to the around him.  The world does not become peaceful simply because he says it is. 

Barry said, "I want to begin with an observation that, given the challenges that we face in the world and the headlines we see every day, may seem improbable but it's true. We are fortunate to be living in the most peaceful, most prosperous, most progressive era in human history."  He went on to say, "That may surprise young people who are watching TV or looking at your phones."  And he went on to say, "and it seems like only bad news comes through every day, but consider it's been decades since the last war between major powers.”

And it was in the same speech that we heard Barry warn against complacency, as "dangerous forces" threaten to take the world backward. Then he announced that he is sending 250 more American special-forces troops to Syria: "They're not going to be leading the fight on the ground," he said, "but they will be essential in providing the training and assisting local forces that continue to drive ISIL back."  While do I have the feeling that once again he sending our troops into harm’s way ill- equipped, ill-prepared and with no real plan once they get there?

After it was after touting all of his world peace drivel that Barry moved on to prosperity and progress saying, "More people live in democracies, where they live wealthier and healthier and better educated with a global economy that has lifted up more than a billion people from extreme poverty and created new middle classes from the Americas to Africa to Asia."  Barry seemed to go out of his way to note that tens of millions of people have been saved from disease and infant mortality and people are living longer, more productive lives. 

Barry said, "Around the world we're more tolerant, with more opportunity for women and gays and lesbians as we push back on bigotry and prejudice."  Now of course he very conveniently failed to mention ‘transgenders’, a topic that is making more than a few headlines back home.  He said, "If you had to choose a moment in time to be born, any time in human history, and you didn't know ahead of time what nationality you were, or what gender, or what your economic status might be, you'd choose today."  Really, who knew?

Yes, yes, yes, Mr. President!, you, and you alone have brought about such peace and tranquility and economic prosperity to the  world-wide stage! They will most certainly build numerous and magnificent monuments to your far-sighted genius! History will proclaim that you were the savior of the entire free world.  Now, if you would excuse me, I need to go THROW UP!  Because the ONLY way your assessment could even remotely be said to be correct would be if you were able to remove completely from the equation the cult of Islam and all of its followers.

Muslims destructive tribal warfare has raged on, in varying degrees of intensity since the 7th century. It is their societal pathology. Muslims depart the chaos of the Middle East only to bring it with them to whichever country has the misfortune to be their destination.  And references made to this cult being a religion of peace are proven to be false almost on a daily basis.  Because it is a cult.  A cult based on hate, on violence and most certainly on death.  These cultists chose to blow themselves up and for no other reason than to kill others.    

The actual fact of the matter is that we are now closer to WWIII than ever before in the past sixty or even seventy years. People in our own country fear going to major events, notice also the casualty rates of our military. Then we have billions sent to undependable volatile countries after training their soldiers for war, and it means nothing that our returned soldiers recount many times when those soldiers they trained turn their American bought weapons on them. N Korea is practicing to destroy us and others.  Barry is not just a traitor to western civilization, he is a traitor to the entire world.

CRUZ PROMISES A KINDER AND GENTLER CAMPAIGN AGAINST HITLERY

Let me start off here by saying that I did vote for Ted Cruz in my state’s primary.  But I must say that as the campaign has progressed I’ve second thoughts and questioning my decision to do so.  First, because I find myself in agreement with Mike Huckabee in that I wish Cruz, and K-Sick for that matter, were as determined in their effort to go after Hitlery as they seem to be in going after Trump.  Secondly it was his answer at yesterday’s Fox news’ “America’s Town Hall” with Ted Cruz to a Hitlery supporter in attendance who asked what his plan was to run against her.

Cruz answered the question by saying that he would not get “personal and nasty” with Hitlery, but rather focus on “substance and the issues.”  He said, “I can’t wait to stand on a debate stage with Hillary Clinton.”  He went on to say, “Because my campaign against her is going to be the same as my campaign has been on the primary – it’s going to be based on substance and the issues.”  Now I guess my question regarding Cruz’s strategy would be, does he really think that Hitlery plans on sticking to the issues?  And if he does, is he really someone we want running for president?

He continued by saying, “In this primary when others have gotten personal and nasty, I haven’t responded in kind. I’m not gonna do that with Hillary either, and instead I’m going to focus on substance.”  Personally I think Cruz is being a bit disingenuous when he claims not to have responded in kind.  And if this is truly how he plans to run against Hitlery, then I thinks he’s already lost and therefore has no business continuing his campaign.  If he is to have any hope of taking the bitch out, then he’s going to be required to get his hands a little dirty.

In all seriousness, what Cruz is basically telling us is that he's going to be running a campaign that has its origin in exactly the same wimpy playbook that we saw utilized when Dole ran for president in 1996, when McCain ran in 2008 and again when Romney ran in 2012.  In other words, a campaign that is run on what is nothing more than a losing strategy.  Romney vowed to stay on the "issues", too.  In other words, to let Barry's various, and quite numerous, illegalities go unchallenged while standing there letting Barry accuse him of causing cancer patients to die. 

It’s become rather frustrating at how Republicans tend to leave no earth unscorched when it comes to challengers and then turn around and roll over for the Democrats. It's as almost as if they don't mind losing if they come in a lucrative second.  Trump will go after Hillary with hammer and tongs.  She is a murderess who lied to the families of four dead men in their coffins. She sold out the U.S. with her greed and lies. She is a combination of Lucretia Borgia, Eva Peron and Mata Hari all in one fat, orange package.  And yet Cruz’s plan seem to be to give Hiterly a pass.

This next election will be, without a doubt, the last opportunity provided to the American people to salvage what’s left of their country.  Cruz needs to, at least, appear to have the same sense of urgency that at least a majority of Republicans now have regarding their future.  And I’ll be honest with you, I’d much rather go down swinging with Trump, than I would being bent over with my cheeks spread with Cruz.  And I’m beginning to sense that if Cruz does get the nomination, he’ll simply take us down that same well-traveled road that past Republican candidates have taken us.

‘CLIMATE CHANGE’, THE LEFT’S GRAND SCHEME…

Regardless of the fact that a majority of those in this country refuse to buy into the continuing propaganda from Democrats and their many minions in the state-controlled media regarding what was once referred to, decades ago, as global cooling, then as global warming, then simply as climate change  and then, when nothing else seemed to apply, as climate disruption.  But a by any other name it’s still a scam.  And now it’s been reported, as we always knew it would, that Barry “Almighty’s” global warming scam would cost America’s poorest families Billions every year.  That’s according to a report recently published by the Manhattan Institute.

The study estimates that Barry’s global warming plan would increase the costs of living for the poorest American families an additional $19 Billion per year, equivalent to increasing their taxes by 166 percent. The tax increase would also raise taxes on other poor families by an extra $25 Billion, equal to a 33 percent tax increase. Meanwhile, Living costs for the richest households would only increase by 4 percent.  Perhaps here we have a reason why Democrat and wealthy liberals like George ‘Looney’ Clooney, Alec ‘The Moron’ Baldwin and of course Lenny DiCaprio seem to be so very firmly on the side of this insanity. 

And oddly enough it’s the very ones who would be getting hit the hardest, if Barry and his Democrat allies are able to succeed with their plan, who insist upon voting for the very ones who agree with Barry that ‘climate change’ is to be the next great apocalypse to be face by man, and only man can do something about it.  So these people are doing nothing than to essentially make themselves poorer for no reason.  Because all of the money Barry wants to spend will accomplish nothing more than to drive energy costs up while having what will be virtually no impact on the climate. It simply makes no sense to support those who support this insanity.   

What Barry wants to do is to implement the Environmental Protection Agency’s Clean Power Plan, which would effectively tax four-fifths of American carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions and be similar in scope to an economy-wide carbon tax.  In addition, Barry has also proposed a $10.25-per-barrel oil tax.  Neither plan would have a large impact on global warming/climate change. Data modeling created by the EPA and run by the libertarian Cato Institute shows that the Clean Power Plan would only have adverted 0.019° Celsius of warming by the year 2100, an amount so small that it couldn’t be detected.  So what’s really behind Barry’s plan?

Oren Cass is a senior fellow at the Manhattan Institute, and he is also the man who authored this specific study.  He said, “The greatest tragedy of the Democrats’ climate agenda is not how little it will accomplish but rather how costly it will be for those least able to afford it.” The study determined that taxing CO2 emissions or gasoline inherently hurts the poor far more than the rich because the lowest-income U.S. households spend roughly 35 percent of their annual income on energy; while the highest income households spent less than 3 percent of their income on energy.  And yet the Democrats portray themselves as being defenders of the poor.

The average American’s electric bill has already gone up 10 percent just since Barry took office in January, 2009, all due to federal regulations.  Granted to rich Hollywood types that a pretty trivial amount, but to many Americans it’s significant. The amount spent to meet global carbon dioxide emissions reduction goals could be as high as $16.5 Trillion between now and 2030, when energy efficiency measures are included, according to projections from the International Energy Agency (IEA). To put these numbers in perspective, the U.S. government is just over $19 Trillion in debt and only produced $17.4 Trillion in gross domestic product in 2014.

Wouldn’t it be nice for change that if what this next election resulted in was us electing a president who bases their policy on the hard facts of this issue.  Because if that were to actually occur the fact are easily available, all one has to do is want to pay attention to them.  As an example, here are but a few crucial, easily verifiable facts about human-generated carbon dioxide and its effect on global warming that he, and everyone else, needs to know and to better understand. The fact is, there has been global warming, but the contribution of human-generated carbon dioxide is necessarily so minuscule as to be nearly undetectable.

Here's why:                                            

1. Carbon dioxide, considered the main vector for human-caused global warming, is some 0.038% of the atmosphere - a trace gas.

2. Water vapor varies from 0% to 4%, and easily averages 1% or more near the Earth’s surface, where the greenhouse effect would be most important, and is about three times more effective a greenhouse gas than is carbon dioxide. So water vapor is at least 25 times more prevalent and three times more effective; that makes it at least 75 times more important to the greenhouse effect than carbon dioxide.

3. The TOTAL contribution of carbon dioxide to the greenhouse effect is therefore 0.013 or less. The total human contribution to atmospheric carbon dioxide since the start of the industrial revolution has been estimated at about 25%.

4. So humans’ carbon dioxide greenhouse effect is a quarter of 0.013, works out to about 0.00325. Total warming of the Earth by the greenhouse effect is widely accepted as about 33 degrees Centigrade, raising average temperature to 59 degrees Fahrenheit. So the contribution of anthropogenic carbon dioxide is less than 0.2 degrees Fahrenheit, or under 0.1 degree Centigrade. Global warming over the last century is thought by many to be 0.6 to 0.8 degrees Centigrade.

But that's only the beginning:

5.  We've had global warming for more than 10,000 years, since the end of the last Ice Age, and there is evidence temperatures were actually somewhat warmer 9,000 years ago and again 4,500 to 8,000 years ago than they are today.

6. Whatever caused that, it was not human activity. It was not all those coal burning power plants and factories and SUVs being operated by Stone Age cavemen while chipping arrowheads out of bits of flint. Whatever the cause was, it melted the glaciers that in North America once extended south to Long Island and parts of New York City into virtually complete disappearance (except for a few mountain remnants). That's one big greenhouse effect!

7. If we are still having global warming - and I suppose we could presume we are, given this 10,000 year history - it seems highly likely that it is still the overwhelmingly primary cause of continued warming, rather than our piddling 0.00325 contribution to the greenhouse effect. Yet even that trend-continuation today needs to be proven.

8. Evidence is that the Medieval Warm Period centered on the 1200s was somewhat warmer than we are now, and the climate was clearly colder in the Little Ice Age in the 1600s than it is now. So we are within the range of normal up-and-down fluctuations without human greenhouse contributions that could be significant, or even measurable.

9. The principal scientists arguing for human-caused global warming have been demonstrably disingenuous, and now you can see why. They have proven that they can not, and should not, be trusted.

The idea that we should be spending hundreds of Billions of dollars and hamstringing the economy of the entire world to reduce carbon dioxide emissions is beyond ludicrous in light of the facts stated above; it’s simply insane. Furthermore, it sucks attention and resources from seeking the other sources of warming and from coping with climate change and its effects in realistic ways. The true motivation underlying the global warming movement is almost certainly ideological and political in nature, and I predict that climate change, as currently presented, will go down as the greatest fraud of all time. It makes Ponzi and Madoff look like rookies by comparison.

ALEC BALDWIN, POSTER BOY FOR SOMETHING CALLED ‘CLIMATE CHANGE DERANGEMENT DISORDER’…

Let me preface what I am about to say here by first saying that anyone who actually believes that entertainers, be they actors, singers, dancers or whatever, are in anyway knowledgeable about anything other than their chosen profession, I think can safely be said to be, at best, seriously misguided, and at worst terminally naïve.   Because when it comes to having received any kind of actual education most of these entertainment types never progressed much beyond high school and more than a few of them likely never even made it that far.  So it’s always best to take whatever they say, about almost anything, with a rather sizable grain of salt.

Now having said that, I think it reasonable to assume that most folks are quite familiar with the periodic fits of outlandish behavior frequently seen coming from that well-known Hollywood loon, Alec Baldwin.  After all, the guy has got quite a temper.  More than once over the course of the last few years his numerous bouts of what can only be described as pretty bizarre behavior have made him the subject of more than just a few news stories.  And it’s yet another example of that that now comes to us by way of a recent interview with AFP that apparently took place after Mr. Baldwin sounded off on climate change at the United Nations.

Baldwin, like most of those in that bastion of insanity called Hollywood, has a rather overinflated sense of importance.  And that was made quite apparent when he took it upon himself to describe those skeptical of ‘climate change’ as suffering from “mental illness.”  Something I think that we can all agree on is the fact that if there is a subject to which Mr. Baldwin can relate, it’s the subject of ‘mental illness’.  And so it was during his appearance at the U. N. that he said, “There can be no successful climate agreement and no future for our planet without greater protection of the world’s forests, everyone in the room understands this.”

And it was in his interview afterward with AFP that Baldwin said, “And so much of what’s coming on now is something that we have to treat as some kind of mental illness.”  He went on to say, “I believe the climate change denial is a form of mental illness.”  Actually, I think it can be said that to deny the overwhelming amount of actual science that proves beyond all doubt that it’s Baldwin and his ilk who, while they may not be suffering from mental illness, are most certainly suffering from some sort of disorder that has them being unable to deal with reality.  They insist upon living within their own little world of make believe.

The fact is that like Liberalism/progressivism, belief in ‘climate change’, can, I think, be said to be the equivalent of some sort of disorder, the symptoms of which include, but are not limited to, a total group think based on some universal doctrine that requires neither proof nor evidence of existence.  Plus, there is ALWAYS a blind and unquestioning loyalty to the Liberal high priests who control what the new narrative will be, and all must follow it regardless of the lack of any logic, evidence, or the likely destructiveness of said narrative, i.e. the new found outrage over one tenth of one percent using the opposite sexes bathroom.

The truth is that you cannot be a Liberal, plain and simple, without a belief in the existence of man-made ‘climate change’, it’s simply impossible.  Baldwin is simply another, on a very long list of many, Hollywood liberal/progressive with ZERO background in science and/or math. The climate has always been changing, it's impossible for it not to and it’s going to continue to change regardless of what man does, or does not do.  Because man has very little to do with it. The big glowing yellow ball in the sky called the SUN is what has the number 1 influence on our climate, not the puny activities of man.

But look, like I said Baldwin does know a thing or two about mental illness. He’s one of those typical radicals who claim that people who view the "global warming by man" idea as not being probable, are denying that there is ‘climate change’ taking place. But nobody has ever said that.  Of course there is climate change taking place, where the disagreement comes in is whether or not it’s being caused by man and therefore man can do anything about it.  Which is absolutely nuts!  Does Baldwin realize that North America was once like the North Pole, covered with ice and snow and now it’s not?  That would be because of ‘climate change’.

Now you would think that especially someone like Baldwin, who so obviously views himself as being so much smarter than we the little people upon whom he relies for his livelihood, would be able to figure out for himself how it is that the world is not exactly like your house.  In that when you set your temperature at 75 your home will pretty much stay at 75 until you decide change the thermostat either warmer, or cooler.  But it would seem that that entire concept escapes him completely.  Now Mr. Baldwin is far from being the only one in his odd little clique who seems to possess zero understanding of what is actually occurring.

Because like so many of those who are so busy sounding the alarm over what they perceive as being the next great apocalypse to be faced by all of mankind, Baldwin finds it far more convenient to simply rely on that which is nothing more than the nearest endless stream of propaganda surrounding the issue than it is to actually go in search of the facts.  And it’s this propaganda that is based far more on leftwing politics than it is on any kind of provable science.  But it matters very little to those who are suffering from a psychosis that seems to inflict, for whatever reason, those in government and the entertainment business more than it does ordinary Americans.

DEMOCRAT PARTY: THE PARTY OF PERVERTS…

So, now we have Chuckie Schumer, aka ‘Chester the Molester’, as was his Democrat colleague over in the House, Steny Hoyer, being unable to provide a simple yes or no answer to what a very basic question, one that is far from complex.  Of course that question is, whether or not he believes that biological males should be allowed to use women’s restrooms in federal facilities and parks in the United States.  But Chuckie did say he thought that the North Carolina law requiring people to use a restroom that matches their biological sex should be repealed. 

So it was then that Chuckie was recently asked the question: “There has been a great deal of controversy lately about North Carolina’s bathroom law. Do you believe that biological males should be allowed to use the ladies’ rooms in federal facilities and parks around the country?"  And Chuckie chose to respond using typical Democrat gibberish saying, “I believe the North Carolina law is discriminatory and they ought to repeal it.”  Now personally, as a commonsense kind of guy, I’m simply not seeing any sort of justification for repealing this law.

And as it has been pointed out, numerous times, the North Carolina law, H.B. 2, states it is “an act to provide for single-sex multiple occupancy bathroom and changing facilities in schools and public agencies and to create statewide consistency in regulation of employment and public accommodations.”  And it then goes on to state that those restrooms are to be used according to one’s biological sex – “the physical condition of being male or female, which is stated on a person’s birth certificate.”  And for that Chuckie wants it repealed?

However, what nasty old perverts like Schumer, and Hoyer as well, continue to so conveniently leave out of the conversation is the fact that this law, which they claim to be so discriminatory, also allows for “accommodations” by allowing entities to provide single-use restrooms “upon a person’s request due to special circumstances.”  But again, I’m assuming that that just makes too much sense for creepy old perverts like Schumer.  And I’d like to know why is it that it’s always we on the right who are the ones who must relinquish our values.     

Chuckie, like Steny, is a prime example of just how deviant those in the Democrat Party have now become.  And I’m sure he figures that he can gain a few votes from the pervert crowd by going against the law!  I’d be curious to know when we can expect to hear Chuckie to start calling for the boycotting of those countries that treat women worse than we allow people in this country to treat their animals?  And I would argue that by calling for a repeal of a law that seeks nothing more than to keep men out of women's restrooms makes clear how he feels about the issue. 

Now the question has been posed by more than a few asking why it is that we should be wasting our time discussing this issue when we have so many other far more important issues that are in need of being discussed.  I think we can all agree that this restroom issue is little more than a distraction.  This is how today’s ‘progressive’ scumbags work, while we’re trying to discuss the important issues, they’re busy trying to work under the radar in an effort to slide our country even further into their preferred area of operation, which would be, of course, the gutter.

The reality is that what’s underway here actually has very little, if anything at all, to do with this new law in North Carolina. That serves as being nothing more than a vehicle by which scumbag Democrats hope to clandestinely continue their effort to eat away at the moral fabric of our society.  The desire of the left has long been to somehow make behavior once seen as being completely unacceptable to at least appear as being acceptable, and then to cast those of us who object to be subjected to such behavior as being nothing more than bigots.

So I guess I would ask those who are now questioning the importance, or even the relevance, of such a conversation taking place, ‘what is more important than morality when it comes to the very survival of one’s society?’  Are we simply to allow those on the left to continue to shove all manner of perversion down our throats until behavior by today’s standards would be considered as being perverted behavior comes to be viewed as acceptable, thus successfully reducing this nation by yet another notch?  A line must be drawn and then strongly defended!

As a way of showing how that can happen I would like to point out how it once was that families tended to shy away from accepting government assistance, it tended to be frowned upon and even avoided if possible.  And when it was accepted it was done so with the understanding that it was only temporary and would come to an end as quickly as possible.  Because it was seen indicating that a man was unable to properly provide for his family.  But today no such reluctance exists.  These days there is almost an eagerness to go onto any kind of government ‘assistance.’  

DEMOCRAT PARTY NOW GOING AFTER THE FREAK VOTE…

It’s in this the latest installment of our continuing series, ‘The Gas Bag Chronicles, starring Steny Hoyer' that I seek the answer to an all important question: “What is it, do you think, that has caused the Democrat Party to go through such a startling metamorphosis where it has gone from the party of JFK and ‘Scoop’ Jackson to ending up where it has now as nothing more than a rather odd assortment of some of the most warped, depraved, twisted and pervert individuals that make up, today, the party of Barry “Almighty?”  Was there some specific event, or series of events, that we can point to as being the cause, or was it simply something that occurred gradually over time?

Which brings me to the primary player in this little saga of mine, none other than Steny Hoyer, who is one of our guys in the House and is someone who represents those in the People’s Republic of Maryland.  Now it was just yesterday that old Steny was heard to declare that people “ought to be able to use the restroom of the gender they identify with.”  Now don’t you have to wonder, at least a little bit, about the moral character of someone who could so casually say such a blatantly idiotic thing, and also be able to maintain a straight face while doing so?  Personally it would seem to indicate, at least to me, just how far into the gutter both he and his party have now managed to descend. 

Hoyer was asked during his weekly little get together with those in the press there at the U.S. Capitol: “There has been a great deal of controversy lately about North Carolina’s bathroom law. Do you believe that biological males should be allowed to use the ladies’ room in federal facilities and parks around the country?”  And as is always the case with boobs like Hoyer, he chose not to directly answer the yes or no question, but instead stated his “position” on the issue.  Steny went on to say, “Look, I think the position we’ve taken is clear that people ought to be able to use the restroom of the gender they identify with. That’s been our position.” And added, “It’s still our position.”

And this so-called ‘controversial’ North Carolina law, H.B. 2, which seems to be the cause for the continuing uproar, simply states it is “an act to provide for single-sex multiple occupancy bathroom and changing facilities in schools and public agencies and to create statewide consistency in regulation of employment and public accommodations.”  It also states that those restrooms are to be used according to one’s biological sex – “the physical condition of being male or female, which is stated on a person’s birth certificate.”  WOW, sure sounds pretty offensive to me!  How dare the people of North Carolina support such an obviously discriminatory law! How bizarre, how bizarre!

However, the law also allows for “accommodations” to be made by allowing entities to provide single-use restrooms “upon a person’s request due to special circumstances.”  And Hoyer said he agreed with what North Carolina Gov. Pat McCrory, a Republican, has said in that he might need to take another look at the legislation that he signed into law last month.  Hoyer said, “He certainly does.”  And he went on to say, “but there isn’t any doubt that this law was designed to be discriminatory.”  No doubt that the law was “designed to be discriminatory?”  On the contrary Steny, there is no need to “take another look” at this law, it was designed to protect the people of North Carolina from perverts to vote for Democrats!

But look, it’s far from being only the leftwing, half-baked scumbags like Steny who are so outraged over the fact that North Carolina would even dare to enact such a law.  It’s many of those in the entertainment industry who have made, and continue to make, a very loud and very concerted effort to shun North Carolina while at the same time seeming not to be bothered in the least when choosing to perform in those countries where both woman and those in the LGBT community are subjugated and abused.  So it would seem that their outrage is more than a little selective.  Personally, if I lived in North Carolina I’d be saying good riddance, who needs these unsavory characters just because they can sing a song.   

But besides those in Show Biz, businesses have also gone off the deep end.  It was announced not all that long ago that PayPal had withdrawn its plans to put a global HQ there in North Carolina.  That despite the fact that this is not a law that was passed for the sake of hating transgendered individuals, but in an effort to keep women and girls safe from the growing Democrat ‘sicko’ voting bloc. Transgender activists claim that no transgendered individual has ever assaulted anyone in the history of ever. Media Matters also likes to claim that the idea of a transgendered bathroom predator was long ago debunked, quoting a group of morons appearing on the Daily Show.  Now there’s a questionable ‘news’ source!

The obvious purpose of this new law is to prevent perverts from freely gaining access to women at their most vulnerable, by pretending to be transgendered.  To anyone, no matter how they identify, this would seem like a commonsense idea. But I guess Steny is fine with some freak dressed as women using the can alongside his wife, daughter or granddaughter?  Or is it just us little people who must be forced into tolerating such perverted behavior?   So for all you folks who view this sort of thing as being no big deal, and you’re ok with a man being in the restroom with your wife, mother, or daughter, then make sure to vote Democrat.  All others can feel free to vote against those who are so accepting of such morally reprehensible behavior.

And what should it tell you about those who are so desperate to gain and then to maintain their political power that they will not hesitate in the least in abandoning all that is moral and welcome in with open arms those who insist upon taking part in disgusting behavior, no matter how perverted, as long as those exhibiting that behavior pledge their allegiance to those who are members of the Democrat Party.  To openly condone such behavior under the guise of inclusivity is really quite pathetic to say nothing of it being blatantly political.  But that’s where we are with today’s Democrat Party. It’s no longer about what’s best for the country, only what’s best for the party in being able to achieve its goal of destroying America.