Just chalk this up as being my last plea for folks
to simply suck it up and focus on what’s best for the country and for the
future of our kids and vote for Donald Trump.
Granted he is not the candidate that many of us wish we had, but he’s
the candidate that we do have and one that is a far better option than the
candidate being put forth by the Democrats.
At least I am able to say, with a great deal of confidence, that Donald
Trump loves this country. Which is
something I feel I can’t say about Hitlery.
While the economy is very important, as is keeping the homeland safe
from those practitioners of the cult often times referred to as a “religion of
peace”, the single most important issue for me is maintaining a Supreme Court
that is more center right than it would be hardcore left.
When Chief Justice John Roberts promised the Senate
Judiciary Committee he would serve as the U.S. Supreme Court’s umpire —
dutifully calling balls and strikes — he most certainly did not anticipate
Justice Sonia Sotomayor swinging for the fences from the end of the bench. As one barely suited to serve even on some
low level city ‘night court’, Sotomayor is one who so very obviously has no
business whatsoever serving as a justice on the highest court in the land. But as we all know, her selection by Barry
had far less to do with her judicial prowess than it did with her willingness
to legislate from the bench. And it was
Sotomayor who gave the Robert A. Stein Lecture at the University of Minnesota
Law School Monday night, where she let slip the inner monologue that runs
during oral argument.
It was there that ‘Justice’ Sotomayor told the
assembly, in reference to the late Justice Antonin Scalia, “There are things
he’d say on the bench, where if I had a baseball bat, I might have used
it.” So this is the caliber of
individual that Barry “Almighty” thought suitable for nomination to the court and
the Senate thought worthy of conformation?
Really? So I’m sure you can sense
the level of my fear when it comes to just who it might be that Hitlery would
nominate and a Senate, likely to be controlled by the Democrats with none other
than ‘Chuckie’ Schumer running the show, most assuredly would confirm. And if
that little nightmare scenario doesn’t send a cold chill right down the center
your spine you’re either dead, a NeverTrumper or a hardcore Hitlery supporter.
It was during this very same lecture that Sotomayor
went on to acknowledge the rather significant ideological chasm between them,
but said losing Scalia was the equivalent of losing a member of one’s
family. So I’m guessing she views as
being acceptable behavior the beating of one’s family member with a baseball
bat? She has elsewhere said she suspects
Scalia raised arguments “just to annoy” her, but that they enjoyed a warm
interpersonal relationship. She further
explained it was important not to impute ill will to one’s adversaries. She said, “If we’ve lost anything, it’s
remembering that differences don’t stand, necessarily, on ill will.” And she went on to add, “If you keep that in
mind, you can resolve almost any issue, because you can find that common ground
to interact with each other.”
So, are you having a difficult time telling she's a
Democrat? Violence is always the answer
when they hear something they don't like.
Instead of trying to convince others into accepting the validity of
their position, their normal course of action is one of character assassination,
slander, innuendo and, of course, violence.
And it’s a vote for Hitlery that will result in getting more losers like
Sotomayor onto the high court. Sotomayor
very clearly reveals herself to be little more than your typical, run of the
mill, Democrat thug, no different than the "protesters" burning down
Ferguson, the fire bombers in North Carolina, the spray painters in Bangor, or
those who thought it was ok to dump human feces into storm drains.
According to liberals being a conservative means
being opposed to everything liberal, which means despising anything associated
with being a liberal. Liberalism, according to liberals, is strongly aligned
with the values of science, honesty, rationale, human rights and reason. Conservatives, again according to liberals,
oppose those values in and of themselves.
Actually, Liberals, in the context of current politics, deny individual
Liberty and Justice as put forth in the U.S. Constitution. Liberals hate
America as well as the founding documents of this country. By denying people of their God-given rights,
liberals have no moral basis for their rather twisted line of thinking. Conservatives, on the other hand, want to
ensure those rights for everyone, regardless of religion, race or sex.
No comments:
Post a Comment