You know, there’s an old saying that goes something
like this: “Even a crazy person will run out of a burning building,” and yet
when it comes to the Democrats’ own little version of a burning building, that
being the concerted effort now being undertaken by them to impeach a duly
elected president, and for no other reason than because he dared to win an
election, it would seem that few may be willing to exit the building. And believe it or not, it’s their so-called
leadership that actually seems to prefer going up in flames, if for no other
reason than at least they’ll all go up in flames together. They seem quite content to move forward with
this lunacy.
It was on Wednesday’s broadcast of MSNBC’s “MTP
Daily,” that we heard one of these supposed ‘leaders’, Steny Hoyer, say that he
wasn’t sure if every House Democrat would choose to vote for what’s being
called an “impeachment inquiry resolution” scheduled for today, Thursday. And it
was in discussing if there was actually a need for a formal vote on the
impeachment inquiry that host Chuck Todd, a very enthusiastic supporter of
impeaching the president, said, “There are some members, he’s not alone, he
voiced it, that not everybody’s convinced you need this vote tomorrow. Make the case.” Oh yes, Steny, by all means make the case!
To which Hoyer said, “They’re correct. We don’t need
the vote tomorrow. The court has indicated that we can proceed as we have been
proceeding. However, what Jerry didn’t mention is we are contemplating changing
from what is essentially the investigatory phase of this matter into the open
hearing—public hearing—phase of the consideration of whether or not there is
evidence to believe that the president has committed high crimes and
misdemeanors.” Let’s face it, it is only
in the alternate universe where the Democrats now seem to reside that there is any
actual proof that the president has committed any ‘crime’ that would warrant
being impeached.
Hoyer went on to say, “And in that public hearing,
we want to make sure that everybody understands this is going to be due
process.” And he added, “This is going
to be fair. It’s not going to be like the trial in the Senate, but it will be a
forum in which the president is given the opportunity to call witnesses, to
cross-examine, to have his representatives present. And for the president
himself to be present. So this is … in the fact that this is a procedural
matter, it’s not necessary to carry out our constitutional duties, but we think
appropriate.” What Democrats think is
“appropriate?” Seriously? This is nothing but the railroading of a
president!
When asked if he expected all House Democrats to
vote for the impeachment inquiry, Hoyer said, “I hope we don’t lose any
Democrats.” He added, “Jim Clyburn and I
have talked, and I don’t know whether we’re going to get every Democrat.” And as it turned out, there were two
Democrats who actually saw the wisdom in running out of that burning building
that the Democrats themselves have managed to set ablaze. At
the risk of repeating myself, it has been on a number of previous occasions
that I have made the argument that the sole motivation behind this partisan
attempt to remove President Trump from office is because he simply was not
supposed to win.
I think most folks, even many Democrats, have to
admit that Nancy Pelosi's Democrat House will go down as being the single best
example of the worst squandering of a House majority and as the least
productive House in history! When
President Trump mentioned “endless investigations” in his most recent State of
the Union address, I must admit I chuckled. But he was absolutely right! From Russian collusion, to obstruction of
justice and now this Ukraine nonsense, Democrats have moved from one
‘investigation’ to the next and in so doing have succeeded only in portraying
themselves as the party with ZERO ideas to offer the American.
‘Pencil Neck’ Schiff, ‘Pumpkin-Head’ Nadler, ‘Botox’
Nancy, ‘Mad Maxine’ Waters, to name but a few of those lunatics involved in what
is nothing more than a ‘witch hunt!’ And
it’s in the process, and this is just my own personal opinion, that they have
succeeded in doing little more than to put those Democrats considered to be
vulnerable in what is, for any politician, the worst possible situation. If they don't vote in favor of impeachment,
they will get primaried by some left-wing nut who could likely win because the
Democrat base has lost its collective mind. If they do vote for it, they'll likely lose
their next election to any Republican with a pulse.
And I find it rather
telling that despite all of the claims of supposed wrongdoing made against this
president, Democrats still have yet to make a case, and at the same time seem
to be quietly admitting that not all of those on their side have been convinced,
as evidenced by the fact that two Democrats chose to vote against this
resolution. The fact is, if Democrats
had any proof of an actual crime, they would make their case to the American
people publicly. Instead, they've
launched into yet another fishing expedition with a few Democrats now admitting
they don't actually have anything to impeach him over. The longer this goes on,
the worse things look for the Democrats.
What is it about our modern day Democrats that has
them thinking that what will present to them their best chance to defeat
President Trump and to also seize complete control of Congress, is by proudly
declaring their deep and abiding hatred of the entire concept of America? I mean, what sense does it make to want to be
in charge of a country that you have absolutely NO love for? Is it just to satisfy some twisted need to be
in charge of something? And a question
for voters should be, do you really want someone who hates your country to be
responsible for both its economic wellbeing as well as for its national
security? For me, that’s a big NO!
It has become a rather sad routine to watch leftwing
politicians literally salivating over the violent carnage in America, viewing
it, I assume, as being something that will make it far easier for them to
advance their toxic agenda of depriving citizens of their right to protect
themselves, their families and their neighbors, from exactly the violent
carnage they claim to be seeking to bring an end to. In truth, they have no solutions, or at least
any that make sense. Take for instance
“Big Toe” O’Rourke who in an attempt to breathe life into a failing presidential
campaign has vowed to send armed government agents door to door rounding up the
guns of law-abiding citizens.
As someone on the outside looking in, It’s hard to
understand how a politician, any politician regardless of political affiliation,
could be so self-absorbed, as well as so driven by their desire to possess at
least some level of political power, that they would willingly stoop to exploiting
any tragedy for their own personal and political gain, especially when the
tragedy involves schoolchildren who have been slaughtered. The general philosophy among so many on the left
is to “never let a good crisis go to waste.” And it’s something that has become
increasingly easy for Democrats if for no other reason that they’re detached in
that they don’t personally know any of the dead.
And then we have everyone’s favorite two time loser,
Hitlery, who actually knew Rep. E-lie-jah Cummings personally and yet still
chose to exploit his funeral, using it as an opportunity to score what must be
seen as being the very cheapest of political points, and on national television
no less. Apparently she simply couldn’t
help herself when it came to delivering what was an utterly classless “eulogy” during
which Hitlery made a thinly veiled reference to President Trump as the wicked
King Ahab from the Bible. I mean who is
it that thinks in this manner and that wasting an opportunity the purpose of
which is to celebrate a life on purely partisan politics is a good idea?
And it was during her ‘eulogy’ that Hitlery said, “Like
that Old Testament prophet, [Rep. Cummings] stood against corrupt leadership of
King Ahab and Queen Jezebel and looked out for the vulnerable among us. He
lifted up the next generation of leaders. He even worked a few miracles. And he
kept reminding us life is no dress rehearsal. The American people want to live
their lives without fear of their leaders.”
I’m not sure who Queen Jezebel is in this strange passage, but nobody
had any doubts about who King Ahab was. It’s
in Hitlery that we have someone who seems to think that she has been prevented
from achieving that which was somehow owed to her.
But to be honest, it is perhaps no display of
political exploitation that has been more disgusting than the recent reaction
of House Democrats to the thrilling news that ISIS founder Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi
blew himself up after U.S. special operations forces cornered him in Syria. This was a man who was, simply put, a heinous
butcher who raped women and girls, ripped out fingernails, burned people alive
and preached beheadings for nonbelievers. His final act before plunging into the fiery
pits of Hell was to murder three of his own children. And yet we heard all manner of kind words
referencing this thug from both the Democrats and their many minions in ‘fake
news.’
The reaction of top Democrats in Congress? Well, that was their outrage over the fact
that President Trump had not told them about the raid beforehand. President Trump, and understandably so,
explained that the mission was simply too sensitive to risk looping in
hopelessly partisan Democrats in Congress who might then go blabbing about the
raid and endanger the lives of U.S. troops.
Proving the president’s point exactly, Speaker Pelosi specifically
complained that President Trump had notified Russian officials. Get it? Because it sounds like more Russia
“collusion.” With every passing day,
these people become more and more impossible to take seriously.
So the only remaining mystery here is trying to
determine just how far the Democrat Party might be willing to go? When this latest ‘witch hunt’ fails and it
becomes certain that President Trump will win re-election and the Democrats,
despite their best efforts, will lose the House, will they then try to convince
their followers to take to the streets and overthrow the election by force? After all, these people seek only absolute power
and have no human decency left within them. They sold their souls a very long
time ago and will not give up their unholy quest without a fight to the finish.
That’s the reason they continue to fight tooth and nail against President Trump.
The Democrat Party ceased being a political party and
more a group of insidious malcontents with the election of Barry O’Bummer. It’s a death cult. Its sacraments are the blood of anyone they
can destroy with an especially high premium now on the blood of our children. Those who now comprise the Democrat Party are
at their most vibrant and enthusiastic when presiding at a funeral. A funeral is a time of macabre sinister
celebration for the Democrat, and Hitlery is certainly no exception, and is veritably
orgasmic with the gleaming rictus grin of death animating her every word at any
celebration of death she can manage to obtain an invite to.
However, even with all of that being said, we must
take them very seriously. What they
continue to do here is to undertake a coup. And if they end up being unsuccessful in their
effort to remove President Trump from office does anyone seriously doubt that
the Democrats would then resort to what they would then likely view as being
their only remaining viable option, that of course being the inciting of violence
the level which could easily be described as a civil war. As for myself I have personally decided to nix
rabid evangelizing liberals from my life. How can I break bread with people who
hate or are against everything that I love?
And on the subject of Democrats and funerals, they do
have quite the tradition of turning ‘funerals’ into ‘fun-erals.’ During the 2002
memorial service for Paul Wellstone, ‘Slick Willy’,Hitlery and Walter Mondale,
along with many other Democrats in attendance, were caught on camera laughing
at one another's comments. And when
‘Slick Willy’ noticed the cameras were on him he went from guffaw mode to grief
mode in a nanosecond. And then there were
those memorable pictures of Barry ‘O’ having a good time at the Nelson Mandela
funeral. The best were with him leaning into some blonde Nordic chick while
taking selfies as the funeral went on.
Hitlery is, and really always has been, a rather
despicable degenerate and a very corrupt individual possessing an inbred sense
of hatred for white conservative Americans, you know those that she once referred
to ‘Deplorables,’ and refuses to acknowledge any black person who has the
audacity to declare themselves to be a conservative or who expresses any level
of support for conservatives and Republicans. She is despised by millions who would love nothing
more than to see weekly updated photos of her behind bars. That we came so close to having this
disgusting reprobate as our president sends a cold chill down my spine every
time I think about it.
Having never been a Democrat at any point in my 60+
years on this Earth, I find it rather difficult to comprehend how it is that
anyone of my age, who has been a lifelong Democrat could, today, still see the
wisdom in voting for those in a political party now represented by those who
possess a deep loathing not only for the country and for those most responsible
for giving it life, but also for a Constitution that has served us so well for
over 230 years. It’s quite literally
every day that Democrats continue to offer proof that they, as a party, are no
longer worthy of that which they are so desperate to achieve. The power to run things as they see fit!
The left's descent into
depravity and downright lunacy has taken on the appearance of a political
process which has now morphed into a psychological one. They call themselves progressive when in fact
it’s only regression that we see coming from them and many of the policies that
they wish to foist on the rest of us. They are actually doing President Trump’s
re-election job for him by reminding everyone how utterly meaningless they are
to any hard-working person's existence!
The Democrat Party is a cancer on America and it’s the Clintons who are
a cancer on the Democrat Party. And I only
hope that both stay around long enough to finish each other off.
I think we can all agree that nearly all of our
supposed ‘news’ organizations these days are pretty leftwing in their approach
to presenting what they laughably still refer to as being genuine ‘news.’ Now I agree that I should have no say in what
it is that they say, I do, however, feel I should have a say in what comes from
those organizations that receive my tax money.
I’ve never been able to figure out why any of my tax dollars should be
going to fund two, National Public Radio (NPR) and Public Broadcasting System
(PBS), supposed ‘news’ outlets that together form what is really nothing more
than a government sponsored/taxpayer funded propaganda apparatus.
Now I’m sure everyone has now heard how it was that
The Washington Post had some very kind words for the ISIS terrorist Abu Bakr
al-Baghdadi, who was recently escorted off to meet up with his 72 virgins,
dying courtesy of the suicide vest he detonated when he became trapped in a
tunnel in northwest Syria by U.S. troops.
But it was not alone when it came to offering such kind remembrances of this
thug. You see, it was during special
coverage of President Trump’s announcement on Sunday of the successful mission that
NPR actually chose to praise the man who was responsible for beheading three
Americans and enslaving and killing an American woman.
Host Lulu Garcia-Navarro led a roundtable discussion
with NPR reporters Greg Myre, Tamara Keith and Daniel Estrin about al Baghdadi’s
death and asked them to tell listeners about the terrorist. And it was Mr. Myre who said, “He led a
movement that we’ve never seen before.”
And he said, “ISIS had tens of thousands of members, fighters, coming in
from all over the world.” He went on to say, “They controlled massive amounts
of territory — in Eastern Syria and Western and Northern Iraq.” And then said, adding ISIS had “millions of
people under their control.” And Myer
said, “They administered cities, they collected taxes.” Wow, a real prince of a guy.
And it was from there Mr. Myer said, “They had this
incredible online recruit presence in terms of spreading propaganda; recruiting
followers.” And then he added, “This is
a guy that sort of emerged on the scene.” He said, “And led this group that had done
something we’d never seen before.” And
then in striking a rather ominous tone Myre warned, “This isn’t the end of
ISIS, but he was a real leader.” He
said, “It’s not somebody that they can just appoint somebody else; take over,
and the movement continues.” And he
said, “His leadership was critical,” before finally admitted that the
terrorist’s death was “definitely a major blow to the Islamic State.” No shit!!
And it was Mr. Estrin who chose to describe the very
successful mission as being little more than a “symbolic victory.” Meanwhile, Ms. Keith, who is billed as being a
White House ‘correspondent’ for NPR, claimed that President Trump makes up U.S.
foreign policy “on the fly” and the president’s announcement took the “focus
away from the muddle and confusion” of his administration. Yup, NPR has some real geniuses in their
employ. I knew there was a reason I
never bother to listen to any of these boobs.
And apparently few others do as well or you would think that NPR would
have long ago been able to give up the need to be subsidized by we the
taxpayers.
This thug, al Baghdadi, kidnapped, tortured, and
raped Kayla Mueller, an American Christian aid worker. NPR is a repugnant, anti-American propaganda
arm of the Democrat Party. And to
describe this murderous thug as a “great leader” one would have to possess a rather
twisted definition of exactly what that means.
After all, were men like Lenin, Stalin, Hitler, Mao, Ho Chi Minh or
Castro “great leaders?” Or, how about
Yasser Arafat, Hugo Chavez or Saddam Hussein, were they “great leaders?” In truth this guy, al Baghdadi, was just the
latest in a long line of murderous tyrants and is one that deserves zero
sympathy or post mortem positive makeover.
Virtually every leftwing media outlet, both print
and broadcast, seemed somehow compelled in their effort to portray al Baghdadi
in what were nearly saintly terms, and as being something other than what he so
very obviously was, but is thankfully no longer. But the resulting, and quite massive, backlash
from people mocking and calling them out over their biased, as well as patently
dishonest, ‘reporting’ had many of them, but not all, soon changing their tune. But look, we really shouldn’t be surprised by
any of their increasingly bizarre behavior.
After all, this has become the modus operandi for so very many of those
in the media over that last decade or so.
I am very curious, though, about when it was that
these loons on the left became so infatuated with this monster, al Baghdadi. Was it when he decapitated human beings and then
stacked their heads like bowling balls and then tweeted pictures out to his
many followers? Or was it when he
kidnapped, raped and tortured women and girls and kept many of them as sex
slaves, after first killing all of the male members of their families? Or perhaps it was when he crucified
Christians and/or mutilated them in various gruesome way. If not, then it had to have been when he burned
human beings alive in cages and chucked gays from the rooftops of tall
buildings.
This creep, al Baghdadi, was the absolute embodiment
of all that is this supposed ‘religion of peace,’ and made clear that it is
nothing more than a cult based on violence, hatred and death. And for anyone to portray it as being anything
other than that is to ignore the obvious.
I mean how is it that any reasonable human being can continue to believe
such nonsense? And yet those in both the
Democrat Party as well as our ‘fake news’ media have no difficulty whatsoever
in describing practitioners of this ‘religion’ as simply people of faith. That, my friends, is nothing short of pure
insanity. To willfully ignore what these
people truly are, could prove deadly.
President Trump has set forth a clear policy of
destroying ISIS and liberating the Iraqi territory they controlled. He has been steadfast in his opposition to
endless wars. President Trump was called a coward by many for not launching an
attack against Iran with the potential of killing over a hundred Iranians over
the loss of a single unmanned drone. Now
he is likened to a madman for actually eliminating a true madman. The media
apparently wants a president who listens only to them and does only what they
want and speaks only in the way they demand or they will make clear how anyone
who dares to disagree with them will relentlessly attacked.
I’m sure everyone will recall how it was that every
Democrat, right down to the very last one, thought Barry O-Bummer was the second
coming, and were confident that his election was going to usher in 40 years of
solid Democrat rule, and obviously they were all quite wrong. Now they seem to
be just as confident that President Trump will be removed from office, and it’s
again that they will be proven to be wrong.
And even in the end if they are proven wrong, they will also be very
sure that President Trump can't possibly get himself re-elected, but again I’m
quite sure that they will be wrong again. All of which will prove that their theatrics
have all been for naught!
And have you ever noticed
how truly psychotic these people seem to be?
Or how they have been trying to steamroll President Trump since even
BEFORE he was elected? No one in
history has been excoriated by those in the press the way that Donald Trump has
been. All of these “investigations” keep leading back to the very same cast of
characters, all of whom are on the left.
I do think they have reason to act the way they do. Fear! Fear of the things that are now slowly being
uncovered and hopefully will be acted upon. The time has come for those
involved in what was nothing more than an attempted coup to be tracked down and
put where they belong, in prison!
Apparently Nancy Pelosi was more than just a little
miffed over the fact that Democrats did not receive advanced notice regarding
the recent, and very successful, effort to bring about the demise of Abu Bakr
al-Baghdadi allowing him to meet up with his 72 virgins, while the Russians
were. But I’d like to make a couple
points here. First, the Russians needed
to be notified to ensure the safety and success of the mission. Second,
notifying congressional Democrats is a presidential courtesy and I’ve seen
nothing to indicate that Democrats are actually worthy of such a courtesy.
And it was in voicing her obvious displeasure that Ms.
Pelosi took what has been described as being another on what has become a very
long list of her thinly veiled pot shots at President Trump, on Sunday, after
he announced the death of ISIS founder and leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi,
complaining that the “Russians but not top Congressional Leadership were
notified” in advance of the raid. But as
is always the case, if you want something to get out you telegraph, telephone,
television or of course, tell-a-Democrat.
But this was not something anyone wanted to get out.
So as we all now know, President Trump announced on
Sunday that ISIS leader al-Baghdadi died as a result of a raid conducted by
U.S. Special Forces. It was in making
the announcement in an address that the president said, “Last night the United
States brought the world’s number one terrorist leader to justice, Abu Bakr
al-Baghdadi is dead.” It was in doing so
that the president said, “He was the founder and leader of ISIS, the most
ruthless and violent terror organization anywhere in the world.” Informing the Democrats would not have been a
very smart move.
Also according to the president, the terrorist
leader chose to detonate his suicide vest as U.S. forces closed in on him
choosing to take the coward’s way out instead of dying for his supposed cause,
like a man. President Trump said, “He
died after running into a dead-end tunnel, whimpering and crying and screaming
all the way.” Which, I might add, is the
way these gutless wonders always choose to leave this world, surrounded by
innocents and strapped with a bomb they then detonate. That my friends, is about as clear cut an act
of cowardice as one can possibly imagine.
And let me remind Pelosi how it was once again left up
to President Trump to clean up yet another mess left behind by his predecessor,
Barry O-Bummer. You see it was back in
2009 that an obviously less than rehabilitated al-Baghdadi was freed from a
U.S. prison camp. He probably didn’t
have any plans to magically transform into a non-radical Moslem, either. The O-Bummer administration had to have
known this, yet it still decided to let him go. And also let’s not forget how it was also this
same administration that swapped five terrorists for a traitor, Bowe Bergdahl.
Anyway, according to reports, notable members of
Congress – including House Intelligence Committee chair Adam ‘Shifty’ Schiff –
were not briefed on the raid in advance due to the fear of leaks. The president
confirmed that in his statement on Sunday saying, “We notified some; others are
being notified as I speak.” He said, “We
were going to notify them last night but we decided not to do that because
Washington leaks like I’ve never seen before.” And he continued saying, “There is no country
in the world that leaks like we do and Washington is a leaking machine.”
Pelosi, while congratulating the “dedication and
skill of our military and our intelligence professionals,” also took a veiled
shot at Trump in her statement, lamenting that the “Russians but not top
Congressional Leadership were notified” in advance. It was in her statement that Pelosi said, “Americans
salute the heroism, and acknowledge the work of our partners in the region.” And she added, “We are relieved that no U.S.
personnel died in this daring raid. The death of al-Baghdadi is significant,
but the death of this ISIS leader does not mean the death of ISIS.”
And she went on to say, “This month, the House
passed a joint resolution on an overwhelmingly bipartisan 354-60 basis which
rejects President Trump’s green-lighting of Turkish aggression into Syria
against our Kurdish partners, and calls on him to present a clear strategy to
defeat ISIS. The House must be briefed
on this raid, which the Russians but not top Congressional Leadership were
notified of in advance, and on the Administration’s overall strategy in the
region. Our military and allies deserve
strong, smart and strategic leadership from Washington.”
Look, I think we all know that the Democrats would
have gladly taken the opportunity to undermine the success of mission if they
had been informed of it ahead of time. President Trump should have said that in
his briefing. He was being nice by
identifying them as leakers and not by calling them out as the traitors we all
know them to be. They would have notified
the targets like O-Bummer did. Remember the planes dropping warning flyers
before we attacked? O-Bummer’s rules of
engagement were not conducive to achieving victory. That’s not the case under President Trump.
Democrats, would have made a political calculation
as they have a history of doing when it comes to how they have chosen to deal
with this president. They possess a
unique unwillingness to allow President Trump to achieve anything that might be
viewed as being a win and therefore leaking information of the raid would have
been in their best interest, politically. President Trump would be blamed for including
too many people and that's why the leak happened. Unless they are in charge they won't allow
anyone to gain credit. They function
only as saboteurs and nothing more.
So I guess we’re just all supposed to be ok with the
fact that the Democrats continue with their effort to manufacture all manner of
lies about President Trump, as well as those in his administration. It’s now gotten to the point where none of
us, including the president, should any longer care about what may causes the
Democrats to get their panties in a bunch.
I couldn’t care less if Pelosi doesn't like not being included in the
loop. The Democrat leaders continue to treat our President with disrespect, and
to call him just about every name in the book and that’s ok with them.
I mean the mentality behind how it is that the
Democrats have decided to approach this issue is one that seems to have its
basis in what is a rather twisted concept that has the enemy (ISIS and
al-Baghdadi) of my enemy (President Trump) is my friend! Never in my 60+ years of being on this planet
have I seen either party driven to the point where we now find the Democrat
Party simply because of the result of a single election. Usually both parties are adult enough to
realize that their candidate, for whatever reason, was not the one voters
wanted as their president and move on.
And it was during this past week that Pelosi and any
number of other Democrats have continued to crow about the fact they can do
whatever they want in the House. That's fine. However, it’s Trump who’s
President. He made the call on this
endeavor. It was an awesome success due
to our fabulous military. Pelosi and her
fellow Democrats can sit down and shut up. The President didn't have to notify them, nor
did they deserve any professional courtesy from our President. Pelosi & Co.
can simply get over it, or not. Congratulations
to our fabulous military and our President.
If I were President Trump there’s no way in Hell that
I would have notified the Democrats, nor those known to be RINOs, in Congress
prior to such a raid because I would fear it would be leaked and the raid
compromised to the point where it would either need to be called off, or would
have resulted in American casualties. There’s
no way I would send our military on a raid such as this and risk letting
Democrats and RINOs know before hand, those people in uniform risk too much
already, they don’t need lying scumbag politicians in D.C. creating additional
risk for them.
Today's Democrats are about politics and power above
ALL else. I have no doubt that someone
from within their ranks would have eagerly, even cheerfully, sabotaged this
mission if it meant they could then use it to label President Trump as a
failure or reckless. Democrats would have willingly sacrificed troops to gain a
political talking point for impeachment.
Can you imagine if any of these U.S. troops would he been killed or
taken prisoner? The Democrats and their
allies in the ‘fake news’ would have had an absolute field day, labeling it as
being another reason for impeachment.
The Democrats see American casualties as justified
‘collateral damage’ if it helps them in their effort to take back the White
House. We are talking about the party
that is furious that Americans have been taken off welfare rolls and put back
to work. The same party that hates the fact that the middle class is able to
enjoy the fruits of their labor instead of being slaves to the Democrat elites.
They would rather enrich themselves than to see their fellow countrymen do
well. The Democrats have embraced the decline of Western Civilization to fatten
their own wallets.
President Trump fired a direct shot and scored
pretty much of a direct hit on Pelosi and her impeachment-crazed fellow
Democrats. His message to Pelosi and her
cadre of unbalanced piss-ants plus all of the NeverTrump RINOs was quite simple
and crystal clear: 1) you cannot be trusted to keep your big mouths shut and 2)
you don’t matter to the operation in the slightest. Heck, Pelosi cannot even
plan, wage or co-ordinate a battle against garbage, used syringes, piss puddles
or other human waste spilling out onto the streets and sidewalks of her own
home town. And why is that?
Pelosi shows her ignorance
over President Trump notifying the Russians and other countries and players in
the area. Those people needed to know so that they would not be caught off
guard, unaware and started into taking military action of their own against
approaching unknown forces. Especially since the airspace our military was
flying through is under Russian control. It was war with bullets, shells, bodies, blood
and explosions. And it was nothing short
of amazing! The right people were left uninformed
and therefore plan came off without a hitch!
Just as it should be!
Yes, this is another attempt on my part to make the
case that ‘Commie Chris’ Wallace is, in fact, nothing more than just another
run-of-the-mill America-hating douche bag masquerading as, you guessed it, a
journalist. And the ultimate irony? The network on which he appears continues to
bill itself as being “Fair and Balanced.” It’s every time he opens his mouth
that he continues to make clear how it has now gotten to the point where we
should longer waste our time listening to him.
After all, life is far too short to waste even a second of it listening
to assholes like ‘Commie Chris.’ And he
recently once again made quite clear, just as his father did before him, his obvious
lack of any true journalistic standards as well as a lack of objectivity and
fairness.
‘Commie Chris’ is yet another one of those who
populate the ‘fake news’ media complex who continue to make quite clear that he
is less of a journalist than he is a political hit man, so to speak, currently
under the employ of the Democrat Party.
Commie Chris’ is a joke, a fraud and someone who has repeatedly shown
himself to be someone desperate to be taken seriously. But it’s because of his own words, and his very
obvious political biases that he continues to put out for all to see that
makes taking him seriously totally impossible.
You see, ‘Commie Chris’ seems long ago to have given up on any real
desire to be a bona fide ‘journalist, choosing instead to be more of a propagandist
who’s thrilled with the sound of his own voice.
And it was on Friday’s broadcast of Fox News
Channel’s “American Newsroom,” that ‘Commie Chris’ Wallace once again proved all
that I have said about him to be true, when he chose to refute Republican
complaints that the House of Representatives’ impeachment inquiry was unfair to
President Trump. ‘Commie Chris’ said, “Well, my feeling is that if you are
having trouble with the facts, you argue process. That’s what Republicans are
doing right now. The Democrats have gotten some very damaging information from
people like William Taylor, the acting U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine, Fiona Hill,
who used to be one of the top advisors in the National Security Council on Ukraine.” Once again ‘Commie Chris’ reveals his
difficulty to tell fact from fiction.
And yet he went on to say, “Evidence that seems to
tie more of a quid pro quo, that there is some evidence from these people
working in the Trump administration that the president linked aid to Ukraine,
White House meeting with Ukrainian president to getting oppo research on the
Democrats.” He continued, “What
Republicans are doing, they’re arguing the process is unfair. You can make that
argument, but if you look back during Benghazi when that was being investigated
by Trey Gowdy, they had hearings in private and depositions in private. You try
to build your case, figure out who are the witnesses that can say something,
and who can’t. Then you will end up holding public hearings anyway.” You simply can’t make this shit up!!
And he added, “There is not a chance in the world
they aren’t going the bring the key witnesses up to be questioned by both
Republicans and Democrats. Democrats have to make the case for impeachment
before they vote. I just think that in the end, after we have these must-see TV
hearings with these key witnesses in public in November, I’m not sure people
are going to care a lot about what the process was in October.” He concluded,
“For all the talk this is being done in private, there are 45 Republicans who
are members of these three committees who have access to this. It’s not like
just the Democrats in a room alone with these Trump administration officials.
There are 45 Republicans who can be in the room and ask them questions as
well.”
So we have yet another example of ‘Commie Chris’
doing is best to offer some level of assistance to the Democrats, but not
really making much sense while doing so.
Because whether or not he wants to admit it, it’s the “facts” that are
on President Trump’s side, and not on the side of the Democrats. And simply declaring that that is not the
case doesn’t make it true. In fact that
is exactly why the Democrats have gone, and continue to go, to such great
lengths in their many attempts to manipulate the entire process in their effort
to swing public opinion. You simply can’t
be that dumb and still call yourself an objective journalist. But you can easily choose to ignore all if
the actual facts when you’re little more than a partisan political hack!
The facts ‘Commie Chris’ is likely referring to are those
the Democrats have chosen to selectively leak. But there’s one fact both the Democrats, and
‘Commie Chris’ seem to casually cast aside because it shows how this entire
process is exactly what the president has called it, a “witch hunt!” The fact that the only two people on the
call, President Trump and the Ukranian president, have both stated, and pretty
definitively so, that there was no quid pro quo. We’ve even seen the transcript of the
call. And yet, ‘Commie Chris’ seems not
to be bothered by how O-Bummer once enlisted the help of the Ukranian
government to investigate Paul Manafort or how three Democrat senators wrote
the letter to the Ukraine president demanding that the Ukraine cooperate with
the Mueller investigation or forfeit U.S. aid?
To begin with ‘Commie Chris’ likes to bill himself
as being a straight up news anchor. But
it’s these days that he seems far more interested in injecting his blatant
leftwing ‘opinions’ into the important stories of the day, and the impeachment
story in particular. He has no business
injecting his opinions into what is supposedly a factual account of the news.
If he wants to do that he needs to get a job over at ‘fake news’ HQ, CNN, like
his friend Shepard Smith, where even the news anchors frequently inject their
opinions into everything. Every time you opine you become a little less
objective and lose a little more credibility.
‘Commie Chris’ learned well at the feet of the master deceiver, his own
father. The apple fell pretty close to the tree.
I just don’t see where President Trump has done anything
wrong because, quite frankly I’ve seen no any actual evidence of any wrong
doing. And that comes after his being the
most investigated person in history and with nothing being found. In fact, he
may be the most honest person to ever occupy the White House. Can you honestly
name ONE thing that has been proven that he's done that's illegal or even
unethical? The vast majority of those
involved in this continuing impeachment charade all have an extreme bias
against President Trump. Which tends to taint whatever their contribution to
the process. And if you don't think they have a bias, just listen to the rage
and irrationality in their voice whenever they talk about him.
The underlying error behind ‘Commie Chris’s’ entire
argument is that he somehow knows “the facts.” So as I said earlier all he truly
knows is what he, as well as the rest of us, has been told him through leaks. If the facts were really stacking up against President
Trump, we would be watching these proceedings 24/7 on every cable ‘news’
channel. The process is criticized because
we don’t get any actual facts, only rumors, innuendo and hearsay. The adversarial system that allows for counter
witnesses and cross examination is what yields any actually ‘facts’ of the
case. ‘Commie Chris’ is either a dumber-than-
dirt buffoon or is knowingly misleading people.
You can take your pick. Personally,
I’m going with both!
Hey ‘Commie Chris,’ how
about you stop with all of the rhetorical sarcasm! With everything that the Democrats have done,
and continue to do, in this farce together with everything that ‘Pencil Neck’ Schiff
has continued to lie about and still you choose to happily support what the Democrat
s are doing. Absolutely amazing! However, it does suit you! You insist on mixing news reporting with
editorial nonsense and opinionated drivel. You’ve become irritating! And your obvious disdain and contempt for President
Trump is clouding what’s left of your judgment.
But then you’re far from being alone in that regard there at ‘Fox
News.’ Those with names like Williams,
Napolitano, Cavuto, Rivera, MacCallum and Baier to name just a few.
Just to be clear, I have never been a fan of Charles
Barkley. As far as I’m concerned he’s always
been a bit of a loudmouthed boob. And the
only difference between the Barkley of old, and the Barkley of today is roughly
150 pounds. I love these athletes,
regardless of the sport they ‘play’, and who have been made quite wealthy for
doing nothing more than playing a kids game, who think by virtue of them able
to dribble, to catch, to throw or to hit a ball, it’s that whichever it is that
they can do somehow makes them somehow smarter than the rest of us. But oddly enough, and I truly do hate to hurt
their fragile feelings, but it’s just the opposite that is so definitely true.
It was during Thursday night’s “NBA Pregame,” on TNT
that supposed ‘analyst’ Barkley, instead of doing what it is that he actually gets
paid to do, chose to take the opportunity to direct some rather strong words in
the direction of Vice President Mike Pence.
And what was the cause of Barkley’s ire, well apparently it was the fact
that the Vice President chose to criticize both the league and Nike for caving
to communist Red China after Houston Rockets General Manager Daryl Morey
tweeted his support for the rights of protesters in Hong Kong. Barkley said Pence “needs to shut the hell
up” because “all American companies are doing business in China.”
Barkley showed his ignorance by boldly declaring, “Vice
President Pence needs to shut the hell up, number one.” And then went on to say, “All American
companies are doing business in China. All American companies are doing
business in China. I thought the criticism of Commissioner Silver and LeBron
James was unfair.” He continued,
“Listen, Daryl Morey, who I like, … he can say whatever he wants to, but there
are consequences. But I don’t understand why these holier-than-thou
politicians, if they [are] so worried about China, why don’t they stop all the
transactions with China?” Frankly it’s
rather a shame that Barkley is nowhere near as smart as he thinks his is.
Barkley said, “President Trump has been talking
about and been arguing with tariffs for China for the last two years, but I
think it’s unfair for them to do all their business in China, and just because
this thing happened to try to make the NBA and our players look bad. All
American companies do business in China, period.” For one thing, not all companies do business
in China. And also it’s, for the most
part, that most of those doing business with China aren’t also going out of
their way to promote all of the supposed ills of America on a world stage like nothing
more than dancing chimps. Barkley should
be a bit more mindful before shooting off his big fat mouth.
These NBA boobs are a perfect example of why sports
should NOT be paying for their ‘education,’ especially as a ‘scholarship’ for
their future careers. You can barely
find ANY of them who can form a complete and understandable sentence. The
scholarships are in name only. Spend any
time listening to them and it becomes very clear very quickly that they are
complete morons. So, the fact that Barkley and his many friends there in the
league are unable to comprehend the significance of the China issue, is really not
at all surprising. All they’re smart enough to understand is, “When do I get my
check?” And that’s all those in charge of league want them to understand.
Like I said, not all American companies do business
with China, and maybe the ones who do, should not. And seriously, the Vice President can't make
these NBA boobs look any worse than they have made themselves look. I mean how is it that one can view doing
business with a country that has a history of murdering over 70 Million of its
own people, still runs bona fide Concentration Camps as well as slave labor camps
or continues to be the worst polluter on the planet as a positive thing. And then of course there’s the fact that Red
China is building a massive military with one goal in mind. But none of that occurs to these geniuses,
because it’s all about the money!
I think that both athletes and entertainers alike truly
believe the country would be far better off if they were dictating foreign and
domestic policy. That the fact that they
have achieved some level of success in their trivial endeavors means that they
are also capable of dealing with those issues that affect the lives 100’s of
millions of people. On the contrary, they are quite literally the very first
thing our society could do without. They produce nothing that people need. They aren't doctors or lawyers. A good plumber
is far more important to society than the entire NBA. What if there was never another basketball
game? What if you couldn't flush your
toilet?
It should be seen as being fundamentally wrong to
kiss the butts that belong to the worst human rights violators on the planet, those
who make segregationists look fair-minded by comparison. Freedom of speech is Vice
President Pence's right, something you don’t have in Red China. Believe me when I say that it would be a
world order with China sitting on top that would have blacks at the bottom.
Fret not though, the real fight is with traitorous white, America-hating
Democrats. They already have brainwashed the black population in America, at
least those who have not been aborted habitually or participate in routine
violence against each other.
And while I’m quite sure that Barkley will likely
not agree, it is he and any number of other mentally deficient athletes who are
the ones who should shut the Hell up. They somehow feel that being famous makes
every word they utter a precious gem. Unfortunately, the gems are worthless.
Athletes, for the most part, should not be telling other people, with different
opinions to shut up. I’m sick of these
fools who became wealthy, by playing a kids game, trying to rule the rest of
us. Vice President Pence knows very well what he said was correct and that he speaks
for America. Guys like Barkley and James speak only for their own benefit, and
care little about the country.
Let’s face it, jocks, or at least the vast majority
of them, are not known for being particularly bright. They're typically large framed, hefty,
boneheaded and dull witted. Not exactly
what you'd choose as your legal representation or your physician, or your
philosophers, or your leaders. These NBA
nitwits are what my mom would've called “low rent people,” and by that she
meant people who have no class, low morals and little initiative. And these very rich individuals continue to
prove on nearly a daily basis that wealth very rarely equates to class. Some of the classiest people I know are
nowhere near to being rich.
These basketball players
with their big mouths and small brains have always had only money,
"bling", "hos", and not much else on their minds. Little thought is ever given to God or to
perhaps spreading their great wealth around to those less fortunate. It’s more
important to be remembered as being rich and famous than of being a man of God.
These men are merely tools so easily used by Red China because all they care
about is themselves and their status and their wealth. Their motto seems be, “Pay
me and I'll dance to whatever tune you play.” Holding them out to our youth as heroes is
akin to Miley Cyrus held up as a person your daughter should try to emulate.
Come on, was ‘Judge Napi’ Napolitano really ever a
Judge, or does he just continue to play one on television? Or, did he once perhaps spend the night at a
‘Holiday Inn Express?’ Because I gotta
tell you, I am having an increasingly difficult time buying anything that this
supposed ‘legal analyst’ has to say when it comes to just about anything that
involves the president. Or is he, as Joe
diGenova has described him, nothing but a fool who’s now doing his best to pay
back the president for turning down his request for a seat on the Supreme
Court? I’ll let you all decide which it
is.
The latest example of ‘Napi’s’ questionable legal
expertise came during Thursday’s broadcast of “Fox & Friends,” when ‘Napi’
attempted to shoot down complaints about how the Democrats were holding
“secret” hearings during their impeachment inquiry of President Trump. ‘Napi’said, “I read the House rules and as
frustrating as it may be to have these hearings going on behind closed doors
the hearings for which Congressman Schiff is presiding, they are consistent
with the rules.” But how is following the
rules that Democrats themselves wrote, an indication that the rules are fair?
‘Napi’ then went on to say, “When were the rules
written last? In January of 2015. And who signed them? John Boehner. And who
enacted them, a Republican majority.” He
added, “These are not the impeachment hearings. The impeachment hearings have
to be held in public by the House Judiciary Committee. This is the initial
interview of witnesses to see what they have to say.” Let’s face it, ‘Napi’ is about as much a
judge, as Al Sharpton is a preacher, both of these loons operate in pretty much
the same manner, and seem to possess the very same character flaws.
And it was co-host Ainsley ‘The Airhead’ Earhardt who
asked,” And they will continue to go on and on and on until they find something
on the president?” To which ‘Judge Napi’
said, “Yes. That’s what police and prosecutors do. They come to a conclusion
that the person is probably guilty, and then they look for evidence to support
or negate that. That’s what Congressman Schiff is doing, and he’s following the
rules, as frustrating as those rules are.”
Like I said, how difficult is it to follow the rules that you yourself
came up with and those on the other side had no part in creating?
Now granted I am about as far removed as is humanly
possible from being a legal expert of any kind. But I am a bit perplexed by ‘Napi’s’ comment
about how police and prosecutors first come to a conclusion that a person is ‘probably’
guilty before then going looking for evidence to support that ‘guilt.’ Silly me, I’ve always thought that first
evidence was first compiled that a crime had been committed and that it was
then followed wherever it led. ‘Napi’s’
conclusion seems to be a bit back ass-wards.
You don’t first start with a defendant before then going in search of a
crime. Do you?
And so, either ‘Napi’ was a man of integrity before
all of this impeachment lunacy started and has since become a lying, vindictive
rat-bastard all because President Trump declined to put him on the Supreme
Court OR, he’s been a lying, butt-kissing weasel all along who sought to curry
favor from President Trump, and conservatives in general, and has now opted to
reveal his true colors now that his career fortunes have shifted. So, is he a toady stooge or a vindictive
rat...either way, he is now a man totally without integrity who is in no way worth
listening to any longer.
If the Democrats were truly interested in having this
continuing circus of theirs viewed as being a bona fide impeachment inquiry
then it will need to be conducted out in the open as impeachment proceedings
are supposed to be conducted. And if not
all the cheerleading from frauds like ‘Judge Napi’ will be for naught. The American people want a fair and open
process. The only reason to be so secretive is to make it easier for the
Democrats to control the narrative, a fact that ‘Napi’ seems to be totally oblivious
to. A transparent process would expose
them for the frauds they are.
But an argument can be made that Schiff is less
“following the rules” as they have been written than he is making them up as he
and his fellow Democrats go along, making it all the easier to flagrantly abuse
the House’s impeachment power. Anyway,
questions of transparency and due process shouldn't be so much ‘rules’ as they
are matters of basic decency. If Republicans
were ever to try something like this ‘Napi’ would likely be screaming bloody
murder! Yup ‘Judge Napi’ is quite the
constitutional expert. Sadly he’s just another
fake driven by his hatred of this president.
The Democrats are using the House Intelligence
Committee which allows for closed door ‘hearings.’ This is an unusual, secretive and rather backhanded
approach to this very important constitutional process. Impeachment hearings are a House Judiciary
Committee function, with no closed door ‘hearings.’ Those are the rules Republicans used back in
1998 and Democrats were involved. The only possible reason Democrats are using
this unusual tactic is that they are: (A) trying to hide something, and/or (B)
trying to keep the story in the news to fester. And ‘Judge Napi’ seems all in favor.
‘Napi’ comes across today as being little more than
a leftist shill. This entire process is a
sham. Democrats are holding an “impeachment
inquiry” without there having been a vote of the entire House. Pelosi has essentially turned the entire
process on its head by taking the hearings away from the Judicial Committee,
the committee responsible for the handling of such inquiries, and turned it
over to the Intelligence Committee which has no authority to run such an
inquiry. And yet ‘Judge Napi’ has boldly
declared that all is taking place just as it should according to the
Constitution.
If anything ‘Judge Napi’ is proving exactly why he
WASN’T qualified to be on the Supreme Court. Imagine the disaster he would have been had he
actually been first nominated and then confirmed by the Senate to be on the
Supreme Court? What seems to drive ‘Judge Napi’ these days is
what drives most everyone who spends the majority of their time seeking
approval from those in positions of power in exchange for attacking this
president. ‘Judge Napi’ continues to
prove that he is willing to say absolutely anything in his effort to be seen as
relevant, while lining his pockets.
And finally, and on what is
kind of a side note, how much better prepared would the Democrats now be in
going up against the president in 2020 had they actually worked with him where
they could to pass legislation that actually had something to do with solving at
least some of our country’s serious problems?
Instead they wasted three years, and counting, doing nothing more than
to search for some sort of evidence, either real or imagined, that President Trump
is actually guilty of some supposed crime. At this point the president’s only crime seems
to be the fact that he won the 2016 election.
There continues to be much ‘cheerleading’ from many in
the ‘fake news’ media with them touting how those commonly referred to as being
the Democrat ‘front runners’ are now well ahead of the president in nearly
every major poll when it comes to being able to successfully defeat him. But oddly enough it would seem that that same
level of enthusiasm is not presently enjoyed by many of the Democrats’ big
money donors. And even all the
continuing talk of impeachment has yet to convince a good number of those very
same donors that any of the current batch of Democrat candidates actually has
what it takes to defeat President Trump in 2020.
And it was on Tuesday of this week, in an article
for the New York Times that Jonathan Martin, someone who bills himself as being
an American political journalist, wrote, “With doubts rising about former Vice
President Joseph R. Biden’s ability to finance a multistate primary campaign,
persistent questions about Senator Elizabeth Warren’s viability in the general
election and skepticism that Mayor Pete Buttigieg, of South Bend, Ind., can
broaden his appeal beyond white voters, Democratic leaders are engaging in a
familiar rite: fretting about who is in the race and longing for a white knight
to enter the contest at the last minute.”
Martin went on to write the “mood of alarm is even
more intense because of the party’s hunger to defeat President Trump and — with
just over three months to go before voting starts in Iowa — their impatience
with finding Mr. or Mrs. Right among the current crop of candidates.” And then it was back in May of this year that
Dallas Mavericks owner Mark Cuban said none of the current Democrat candidates
could beat President Trump in 2020. He
said, “If you look at why people voted for Donald Trump, in my opinion, first and
foremost it was because he wasn’t a politician.” And he added, “Politicians are the least
trusted of every profession.”
And you have to wonder how it was that the DNC did
not see this coming. Every candidate now in the running seems to enthusiastically
embrace Socialism and it is in so doing that they have excluded themselves from
roughly 80 percent of the country. Sure,
they have their blind followers in their reliable coastal strongholds as well
as in those areas sprinkled across the country, but if they think that’s going
to be enough to cross the finish line ahead of the president, they’re dreaming.
Pelosi knows this, hence the reason why
she’s decided to move forward with the impeachment farce. The goal seems to be
to remove the president before they’re made to face him.
Both the Democrats as well as their many minions in
the ‘fake news’ would have us all believe that it’s everyone in the country
that hates President Trump with a majority actually in favor of him being
impeached. Even ‘Fox News’ is guilty of
having concocted a ‘poll,’ that has since been shown to be quite bogus, that
reported to show that a majority of Americans are now in favor of impeachment. All those now running for the Democrat presidential
nomination is a card-carrying leftist in good standing, and that any one of
them can be described as being a ‘moderate’ is simply ludicrous. The ‘moderate’ Democrat is someone who no
longer exists.
If these donors are really all that concerned about
their prospects in 2020 they would realize that what they need is not so much a
‘white knight’ as they need someone who comes across as having a genuine love
for America. Because there is no one,
and I mean absolutely no one, in the current batch of candidates that can be
said to fit that bill. You simply cannot
claim to love this country, or to possess ‘American values’ when you are
advocating for open borders, all manner of break-the-bank social policies, how
there are more than two genders or favor the butchering of babies right up to
moment of birth. But that is the modern
day Democrat Party.
But then if we’re being honest here the Democrat
Party doesn't really believe in ‘white knights.’ Black knights or Brown knights definitely, Yellow
knights maybe, Homosexual knights or Transsexual knights for sure, and even Lesbian
knights. Hell, even summer knights! But never, EVER, straight, able-bodied white
male knights! The problem for the
hate-America, fascist scum who run the Democrat party, is that they would eat
alive anyone capable of making the next election a genuine contest. That person
would have to genuinely care about America and ALL of her people. And yet the Democrat Party would never support
such a person.
The reasons Americans voted for President Trump have
now become even more pronounced to the point where it doesn’t really matter who
the Democrats nominate, they’re not going to be elected! The Democrat Party has become all anti-America,
all anti-freedom and all hatred, all the time.
And the Democrat platform is one that supports genocide, illegal
immigration, gun confiscation and extremely high taxes. The kicker here is that the Democrat Party now
seems to favor population control not unlike what’s seen in Red China, but then
wants more immigrants, meaning they seek to get rid of citizens only to then replace
them with those from other countries.
Don’t expect to see any
letup in the impeachment madness inflicting those on the left. And rest assured the lies will continue, spewed
by the propaganda arm of the Democrat Party, the ‘fake news’ media. And trust me when I say that it will only get
worse once ‘Crooked Joe’ and ‘Hooker Harris’ drop out and Bernie is left far
behind. The whistle blowers will appear out of nowhere and the anonymous tips will
be many, while President Trump is called a white supremacist and more all in an
effort to try to turn the American people against President Trump. The Democrats and their friends in the ‘fake
news’ will continue the onslaught because it’s the only hope they have.