RACIST BUFFOON HAKEEM JEFFRIES EXPLAINS ‘LIBERAL LOGIC’ AS ONLY A RACIST BUFFOON LIKE HAKEEM JEFFRIES CAN…

The logic that formed the basis of this impeachment attempt is truly difficult to even try to understand, unless, of course, you happen to be a Democrat.  And while those on the left continue to take great pleasure in describing those of us who don’t particularly share that rather skewed view of the world as being rather low on the evolutionary scale, I must say, it has been after watching, and listening, to those placed in charge of trying to impeach our duly elected president, that I am feeling particularly intelligent today. Because these people are nothing short of morons!

As evidence of that I present as Exhibit A, Hakeem Jeffries, one of the ‘brilliant’ House impeachment managers.  You see it was this past Thursday, as the Democrats were watching the walls collapsing all around them, that Jeffries actually made the argument that Democrats’ hiring of a former British spy to collect dirt from Russian sources about the Trump campaign does not constitute foreign interference in the 2016 presidential election.  Now let’s just assume that the Democrats are as smart as they say they are and we’re as dumb as they claim, what about that makes any sense?  

Jeffries argument was based on the rather puzzling logic that Democrats paid for the information from the retired spy, Christopher Steele, rather than simply obtaining it.  It was in response to a question from Sen. Richard Burr and a group of Republican senators that Jeffries said, “The analogy is not applicable to the present situation because first, to the extent that opposition research was obtained, it was opposition research that was purchased.”   And what I found to be truly remarkable was that Jeffries was able to make such a statement all the while maintaining a straight face.

Look, if I was a Democrat who truly thought that President Trump was in need of being impeached I would, today, be scratching my head as I wondered how, out of 232 Democrats to choose from in the House, this is my A-Team for doing so.  This guy, along with Schiff and Nadler, are about as useless as an ejection seat in a helicopter.  I didn't think it was possible to assemble a team that would make Schiff look like the smartest guy on the team but somehow the Democrats did just that.  This entire circus has come to say far more about the Democrats than about the president.

The Republicans had asked: “Hillary Clinton’s campaign and the Democratic National Committee hired a retired foreign spy to work with Russian contacts to build a dossier of opposition research against her political opponent, Donald Trump. Under the House managers’ standard would the dossier be considered as foreign interference in a U.S. election, a violation of the law, and/or an impeachable offense?”  The Clinton campaign and DNC, through their law firm, paid just over $1 million to opposition research firm Fusion GPS to investigate Donald Trump and members of his campaign.

And it was as part of that project that Fusion GPS hired Steele, a former British spy, to look into candidate Trump’s ties to Russia.  Steele relied on a network of sources to collect information from Russian government officials.  Steele provided the information to the FBI and members of the media.  Republicans have long cited Democrats’ hiring of Steele to rebut allegations that the Trump campaign colluded with Russia.  And it was after a 2 year investigation by super sleuth Mueller that failed to establish that candidate Trump, or any of his associates, conspired with Russians.

Jeffries’s patently idiotic claim prompted a sarcastic response from Trump attorney Jay Sekulow, who said, “So, I guess you could buy, this is what it sounds like, you can buy a foreign interference.  You can purchase, if you purchase it, you purchase their opposition research, I guess it’s okay.”  Apparently Jeffries was under the impression, as Democrats typically are, that whatever it is that they say will be believed because it is they who are saying it.  There is never to be any reason to doubt the veracity of what has been said because Democrats, as we all know, speak ONLY the truth.

Now I know the Democrats and their many allies in the ‘fake news’ media and in Hollyweird view those of us who continue to support President Trump as being just a bunch of rubes.  But it’s that perception of us that has, I think, allowed the Democrats to go down a road that they perhaps otherwise might not have gone down.  Because had they given us even a smidgen of credit for being smart enough to see what they were really up to, this bogus attempt at impeachment might never have even happened.  But they thought we were too stupid to see what was going on.     

And so it’s according to the logic as presented to us by Jeffries that the act of paying for a crime actually legitimizes the crime, but ONLY if said crime is committed by a Democrat, otherwise all bets are off.  This is what Democrats now expect us to believe?  So it’s once again that we see how the Democrats view themselves as somehow being above having to abide by the law.  They are free to do whatever they view as necessary for them to advance their insanity with absolutely no fear of ever having to face any sort of consequences.  And we’re not to have an issue with that?  

And so perhaps someone can explain to me how voting for any Democrat can in any way be seen as being in the best interest of America.  After all, it has been this latest exercise in pure political theater that should convince every American that the vast majority of Democrats are both bigots and hypocrites who hate America, its institutions, its history, its free-market economics system, and they hate their fellow citizens who dare to disagree with them.  But they especially hate whites in general and heterosexual white males in particular who tend to Trump voters.

SCHIFF AND NADLER, THE ‘LAUREL AND HARDY’ OF AMERICAN POLITICS…

The attempt to impeach Donald J. Trump which was initially begun on November 9, 2016 will, thankfully, soon come to close and it will end not with the hoped for bang but instead, and to the disappointment of Democrats, pretty much with a whimper.  I saw an ad this morning on television for Peter Popoff’s ‘Miracle Spring Water,’ and I immediately thought of those who have been so desperately trying, for over three years, to succeed in overturning the 2016 election.  And I thought to myself that this stuff just might help them, it certainly seemed to help all those who have tried it. 

Anyway, it was earlier this week, on Wednesday, that Jerry ‘Pumpkin Head’ Nadler made what appeared to be a last ditch effort on the part of the House Democrats to convince those in attendance that, yes, Donald Trump truly is deserving of being removed from office because he represents, according to the Democrats, that which is obviously a very clear and present danger to the country.   Nadler said that President Trump must be “brought to heel” and the country “saved” from his efforts to “rig our elections.”  “Brought to heel?”  A rather odd choice of words, I thought.

And who is it that talks about any president in such manner?  Just imagine had any Republican EVER directed such a comment at Barry ‘O’, all Hell would have broken loose, to the point where we’d still be hearing about the ‘racist’ individual who dared to say it.  President Trump is not the problem here.  It’s those who insist upon resisting a lawful election, refusing the peaceful transfer of power, insulting/hating half the country, protecting/coddling criminals while disarming lawful citizens and using Congress to help them win in November, it’s they who are the ‘real’ problem.

Apparently Wednesday’s Senate activity was centered around written questions posed by various senators, followed by responses from both House impeachment ‘managers’ and the president’s legal defense team.  Nadler, in making his call for the president to be “brought to heel” was responding to a written question posed by Democrat Senator ‘Little Dick’ Durbin regarding whether President Trump, if he invokes executive privilege, would be “required to identify the specific documents or communications containing sensitive material that he seeks to protect.” 

Accusing President Trump of creating “diversion after diversion,” particularly when referring to what “Hunter Biden may have done in Ukraine,” Nadler insisted that the president has “claimed absolute immunity,” not executive privilege, because he “fears the facts.”  Despite the many claims made by Nadler and his pathetic little partner in this continuing charade, ’Shifty Schiff, this entire impeachment sham has been completely devoid of any actual facts.  It has been a work of complete fiction supported only by various lies, rumors, mischaracterizations and innuendo.

But still Nadler droned on saying, “But the facts are the facts,” after making his case that former national security advisor John Bolton should be allowed to testify.  He said, “The president is a danger to the United States. He’s tried to rig the next election. He’s abused his power and he must be brought to heel and the country must be saved from his continuing efforts to rig our elections.”  Imagine that, a Democrat expressing concern over the rigging of an election.  More often than not that’s the ONLY way a Democrat can win, it’s just that their best efforts failed them in 2016.

And it was Nadler’s co-conspirator, Adam Schiff, who was asked by Senators Lindsey Graham and Ted Cruz whether Obama would have had the authority to investigate suspected corruption by a son of Mitt Romney, Obama’s rival in 2012.  Schiff told the Senate that it would be wrong for a president to ask the Department of Justice to investigate a political rival.  But he then defended ex-president Barry ‘O’ doing just that to then-candidate Donald Trump.  Schiff dismissed the hypothetical, and then went on to argue that a president should not ask the DOJ to investigate a rival.

And it was Schiff who tried to convince the Senate that it had to subpoena more witnesses and documents because it could not “rely on what was investigated in the House.”  Schiff’s rather odd argument appeared to admit that the House investigation was insufficient, even as fellow House impeachment manager Nadler claimed that the impeachment case had already been “proven beyond any doubt at all.”  Schiff claimed that it would be unprecedented to hold a Senate trial without witnesses despite the fact he had denied all Republican requests for new witnesses.

It’s Nadler and Schiff who should be the first ones to be removed, ousted, usurped, out of office post haste along with any of their corrupt comrades who have played any part in what has been this continuing sham or, at this point, this scam.  Although, I must admit that these two buffoons have provided a service, of sorts, to us in that they’ve succeeded in removing any and all doubt regarding just what it is that the Democrat Party of today stands for.  They are a party that craves political power above all else, and it would seem to matter not how it is that they come to acquire it.

And let’s not forget that it was President Trump’s predecessor who came into office boldly declaring his desire to “fundamentally transform” the Unite States of America, and how Nadler, and those like him, apparently saw no real cause for concern and therefore saw no apparent emergent need for the then president to be, to use Nadler’s words, “brought to heel.”  After all, I have no doubt that there were many on his side of the aisle who were in total agreement, that, yes, the country was very much in need of a “fundamental transformation,” and not at all in a positive way.

But what Democrats are most definitely not in agreement with is the promise that was first made by candidate Donald Trump, and the promise then kept by President Donald Trump to “Make America Great Again.”  And make no mistake, that’s what all of this impeachment nonsense it really all about.   Whereas the Democrats, and dare I say a significant number of Republicans, had virtually no problem with Barry working to drag our country further and further to the left, they seem to take great exception to the fact that President Trump seeks to take our country down a different path.  

The only thing House Democrats have been able to prove thus far is the fact that they themselves are the ones guilty of doing exactly what they are accusing President Trump of having done. That’s how members of the modern day Democrat Party operate.  You can’t impeach a duly elected President simply because you hate him or disagree with his policies.  Accuse them of doing so and the Democrats yell, scream, and throw a temper tantrum.  That has been proven time and time again.  Watch not only what they say, but what they do because it will tell you all you need to know.

Democrats have been rejecting, denying, and disputing the 2016 election for over three years!  We’ve moved from Russian interference to James Comey, to President Trump’s supposed cheating, to voter suppression, to the Electoral College and on and on and on!  And doing it in as many ways as they can conjure up, they have done everything in their power to convince Americans that Donald Trump is an illegitimate president!  Basically telling us that 63 million people did not vote for the correct candidate because they weren't informed and because they’re just not that smart!

The modus operandi of the Democrat Party has long been one that involves defaming, slandering, and/or proclaiming anyone who dares to disagree with them as being a racist, a sexist, a homophobe, and every other sort of ‘phobe.  Democrats today seem interested only in representing those who are rabidly anti-America and who seek little more than the complete destruction of our country.  They substitute feelings for facts and stir up emotions in order to manipulate voter opinion!  Remember, it’s liberalism that promotes the government having control over every aspect of our lives. 

A thought should be more than a little disconcerting to everyone since it’s everything that the Democrats touch that before long turns to shit.  Look the Democrats are disgusting little creatures who run on hate, lies and obstruction.  Right about now they’re likely pretty sure that they’re going to lose in November, so the goal has now  become one where they’re seeking to drag this lunacy out for as long as possible and hopefully succeed in wounding President Trump and by doing so making their approaching loss a little less humiliating.  Only time will tell if they’ve succeeded.

DON ‘LE MOAN’, WHAT IT MEANS TO BE A JOURNALIST IN 2020…

How is it that there can still be anyone anywhere in this great country of ours willing to waste even a second of the precious, and very short, time that we are all granted on this Earth listening to the never-ending, incessant drivel spewed by anyone on the Communist News Network (CNN) or, for that matter, MSDNC?  I mean these two organizations are about as far removed from being bona fide ‘news’ organizations as one can possibly be.  They both, and pretty routinely, demonstrate that they provide no other function than to serve as the propaganda arm of the Democrat Party.

And we saw yet another rather sick example of that as recently as this past Saturday during the primetime CNN broadcast of ‘Tonight with Don Le Moan,’ featuring show regular Rick Wilson, someone described as being Republican ‘strategist’ along with network contributor Wajahat Ali, apparently a columnist for the New York Times.  You see, it was then that these three hapless boobs spent what was an entire segment of the program doing nothing more than to ridicule those of us who choose to support President Trump.  This is now what passes as serious ‘news’ on CNN?

And then it was during Tuesday’s broadcast that ‘Le Moan’ apparently felt the need to address the ‘controversy’ created by that same segment that had aired on Saturday night.  The segment even caught the attention of President Trump, who of course tweeted about it on Tuesday.  According to ‘Le Moan’, it was during the segment in question that he was not actually laughing at supporters of President Trump. Nope, no way!  Instead, he said, he was only laughing at the joke told by Wilson and insisted that he does not laugh at people for “who they are” or “for what they believe.”

‘Le Moan’ said, “One final note that I have for you because this is personally important to me to address this. Ask anyone who knows me, they’ll tell you, I don’t believe in belittling people. Belittling anyone for who they are, for what they believe, or where they’re from. During an interview on Saturday night, one of my guests said something that made me laugh. And while in the moment I found the joke humorous, and I didn’t catch everything that was said. Just to make this perfectly clear — I was laughing at the joke and not at any group of people.”

Now the idea that he was laughing only at Wilson’s lame “Ukraine joke” and didn’t hear the 30 or more seconds of “belittling” that followed, is a lie, he’s not fooling anyone.  We’re really not that stupid.  ‘Le Moan’ wasn’t laughing out loud.  He was laughing silently and quietly, and the earpiece everyone wears while on television, or so I’ve been told, allows you to hear everything more clearly than the audience at home.  So, since the 14 people, give or take, who were likely watching that night heard every word, and CNN’s credibly-accused sexual assaulter almost certainly did.

I can’t believe that these morons REALLY want to go there.  I mean what is more stupid than calling for safe spaces, wearing genitalia hats, having a man as woman of the year and a boy as cover girl, biological men competing against women or voting for Barry ‘O’, not once but TWICE.  And then there’s the Clinton's, Pelosi, AOC, all of the clowns on CNN, MSDNC and more than a few on Fox.  Also, we have all those out in Hollyweird, and poop, the needles and the homeless now clogging the streets of nearly every city in California.  But thankfully there’s no plastic straws.  

And is it not stupid to think that we can somehow tax cyclical, natural occurring, been happening for millions of years, ‘climate change’ into submission by traveling around the country in our private jets and limousines.   Oh ya, and Greta is just oh so damn smart, Barry ‘O’ actually earned that Noble Peace Prize, and the Moochelle deserved what was it, a Grammy?  The hijab is empowering and Moslems love America.  Look, I can go on but what’s the point?  So when all is actually said and done, who is it, really, that comes across as being the ones who look stupid?  

‘Le Moan’s’ apology was the joke.  Another one of those “if I offended someone, then I’m sorry” type of apologies.  I’m pretty sure that being able to look into the camera and lie with a straight face is likely seen as being a resume enhancer for those applying at CNN.  And I think it’s pretty clear that old ‘light-in-the-loafers’ ‘Le Moan’ is another of those who are viewed as being little more than the foot soldiers who can be safely relied upon by those who run the Democrat Party and are tasked with causing as much hate and discontent as they can among the American people.   

So his defense is that he wasn't laughing at any specific group of people, he was only laughing at a joke, about a group of people.  As the host of his show, he’s responsible for everything that does and doesn't happen on his show.  Did he shut it down and quickly apologize, or did he simply let it continue and actually take part.  And then when he’s the recipient of a little push back he essentially throws the teller of the ‘joke’ under the bus.  So like any good liberal, the fault that people were offended lies not with him, but with the teller of the joke.  He merely laughed at the joke.

Regardless, it’s too little too late. This moron just made a huge contribution to this President’s re-election.  Thousands of people requested tickets to his rally yesterday in the New Jersey town of Wildwood in the dead of winter, when the town is normally deserted.  Just what it is that these CNN morons think of that?  Not only did Hitlery’s “deplorables” show up, but so did an impressive number of Democrats.  Speaking of the ‘fake news’ media being out of touch with the real Americans, these deranged CNN elites didn’t get it back in 2016, and they still don’t get it today.

Yes, we all get it Mr. ‘Le Moan’!  It’s you, and those like you, who have no trouble mocking those of us who choose to disagree with the insanity spewed by those on the left. We who dare to love, and who are proud of this country, are all deemed to be a bunch of “deplorables” or those who make up what ‘Crooked Joe’ Biden once referred to as, the “dregs of society.”  And somehow we’re the racist ones because we chose not to vote for Barry ‘O’, not because he was black but instead because he made it clear that his stated goal was to “fundamentally transform” the country we love.

For anyone watching the video clip it becomes pretty clear, pretty quickly, exactly what it was that ‘Le Moan’ was laughing at.  He participated wholeheartedly in mocking what is an entire group of Americans simply because of who they are, what they are and what they believe in.  But we shouldn’t be surprised because, after all, this type of behavior has become typical of those on the left, to mock those who dare to disagree and are therefore deserving of zero respect.  And this is simply what CNN does and has repeatedly done for more than 10 years instead of presenting the news.

So let me see if I understand this. The Democrats think that it was a bunch of rubes who beat them in 2016?  Trump beat the pantsuit off a woman whom the left had declared to be “the smartest woman in the world” and “the most qualified person to ever run for president,” in an election rigged for her to win.  He was made to fight against both political parties, multiple government agencies and the ‘fake news’ media all of which were working against him.  If I had been beaten like the Democrats were, I'd be saying the ones who beat me were nothing short of freakin’ geniuses.

WHEN RINOS ATTACK…AGAIN…

You know, if there was a button I could push that would make every single RINO in Congress go up in a burst of flame followed by a puff of smoke I would gladly push it.  I mean just how much of a piece of shit must you be to willingly take part in what is now going on in Congress, disguised as an impeachment process but what is in reality something that has never before occurred in this country, but is something quite common in most third world countries, especially those of the ‘banana republic’ variety.  It’s nothing less than a political coup?  I find it all quite disgusting.

And chief among those much in need of going up in smoke would be none other than RINOs Willard ‘Mitt’ Romney who as recently as yesterday said that he believes it’s “important” for John Bolton to testify in the Senate impeachment trial, and Susan Collins who said that she too thinks that the leaks from Bolton’s upcoming book may tie into the case that “strengthens” the argument for calling him as a witness.  Once again these two notorious back-stabbers make it abundantly clear exactly whose side it is that they are on.  And once again it is not the side of the American people.

It was sore-loser Willard who said, “I think with the story that came out yesterday, it’s increasingly apparent it would be important to hear from John Bolton.”  And this fraud then went on to say, “I, of course, will make a final decision on witnesses after we’ve heard from not only the prosecution but also the defense. But I think at this stage it’s pretty fair to say that John Bolton has a relevant testimony to provide to those of us who are sitting in impartial justice.” I really pains me to no end to admit that I once voted for this guy.  That’s one vote I would love to have back.   

Meanwhile, whereas Willard at least had the guts to face reporters, it was Collins who instead simply chose to release a statement, on Monday, in which she said that she is still in favor of witnesses at the trial. She said, in her statement, “The reports about Bolton’s book strengthen the case for witnesses and have prompted a number of conversations among my colleagues.”   Her colleagues?  By that I’m quite sure she means that she had conversations with all of her fellow RINOs there in the Senate, which, these days, seems to be more than quite a few.  A bunch of turncoats!

Willard, who is a longtime hater of President Trump, has indicated for some time now that he’s onboard with the calling of additional witnesses as part of the upper chamber’s proceedings, including Bolton.  It was earlier this month that Willard said, “I support the Clinton impeachment model, which is a vote on witnesses later. But as to which witnesses I’d want to hear from, and so forth, that’s something which I’m open to until after the opening arguments.”  And he added that Bolton is someone who “I would like to hear from, and presumably, I’d get the chance to vote for that.”

And not to be left out of this unique little band of turncoats, and also deserving of going up in smoke, are fellow RINOS Lisa Murkowski and Cory Gardner who have joined forces, so to speak, with Willard and Collins in thinking that it would be a Hell of a good idea to hear from Bolton, especially after the New York Times leaked a portion of Bolton’s yet to be released new book.  And then, of course, there’s RINO Lamar Alexander, who also appears to be compelled to want to hear from Bolton, viewing himself safe, I assume, since he won’t be running for re-election.  

And it was Murkowski too who took the coward’s way out by choosing to release a statement in which she said, “I stated before that I was curious as to what John Bolton might have to say. From the outset, I’ve worked to ensure this trial would be fair and that members would have the opportunity to weigh in after its initial phase to determine if we need more info.  I’ve also said there is an appropriate time for us to evaluate whether we need additional information —that time is almost here. I look forward to the White House wrapping up presentation of its case.”

Look, both Willard and Collins, hate President Trump with every fiber of their being and both are corrupt establishment hacks!  AND, both represent everything that's rotten within the modern Republican Party, many of whose members, as do both of these hacks, like to refer to themselves as being ‘conservatives.’  But, as they say, actions speak much louder than words and that these RINOs would even entertain joining forces with those trying to overturn an election that occurred over three years ago tells us everything we need to know about of them, and every other RINO!

And perhaps someone could convince them to shift their focus back to the case presented to them by the House, and only that case, instead of trying to expand it. Bolton isn't even mentioned in the articles of impeachment.  He’s absolutely irrelevant.  Perhaps they should focus on the meal that’s in front of them?  This is all so ludicrous.  I mean, do they really think we’re too stupid to see what they’re doing?  Apparently not, since word now comes that we have yet another RINO in the Senate, James Lankford, declaring that the Senate needs to see Bolton’s manuscript.  

So what we end up with is a case where the usual suspects are working to legitimize the illegitimate sham of an impeachment process.  And either they're too stupid to realize that this supposed ‘leak’ was designed to do exactly what it is doing, or worse are somehow complicit in bringing it about.  Bolton releasing this tell all book at this time is beyond irresponsible.  I assume that Bolton's got a bone to pick with President Trump, and chooses to act as cowards always do, by stabbing he who ‘offended’ him in the back instead acting like a man. I actually used to like this guy.  Stupid me!

The only “new” witnesses the Senate should even consider wanting to hear from would be those called by President Trump’s team. The Democrats made their case, as poor as it was, and had witnesses to support that case. There is no justification for new witnesses on the Democrats’ behalf at this stage of the impeachment process. On the leaks, there is a long history (3 plus years now) of highly selective edited, misleading, or fraudulent leaks made against President Trump.  Why would you give ANY anonymous leak against the president ANY credibility at this point in time?

So I’ll ask again, whose side it is that these people continue to be on?  Most certainly not our side!  This entire process has been nothing other than completely insane!  It’s as if we the people no longer even exist.  The bottom line here is that we simply cannot trust those whom we send to Washington to do anything other than what THEY want to do once they get there.  And apparently they think that we should be ok with that?  Well, we’re NOT!  But I’m a little unclear how best to get that message across to them.  Sure, we could simply vote them out, but then what?  Is it a Catch-22?

CHRIS WALLASS, ANOTHER DAY IN THE LIFE OF A FAUX ‘JOURNALIST’…

So I’m sure there are those who are tired of me going off about what a joke of a journalist ‘Commie Chris’ Wallass is, but I can’t help myself.  His grotesque smugness drives me crazy.  And you know, it would be different if he wasn’t quite so obvious regarding his disdain for President Trump and what is his willingness to perpetuate any rumor no matter how baseless.  I mean is that really what we should expect to hear from responsible ‘journalists’?  Call me silly, but somehow I just don’t think so.

And you know, if old ‘Commie Chris’ Wallass was half as smart as he apparently thinks himself to be, he might actually be worth listening to.  But instead it’s every time that he opens his mouth that he proves, yet again, just how little it is that he actually knows about anything, ESPECIALLY our Constitution.   And it was as recently as yesterday, in choosing to go up against Prof. Alan Dershowitz, that Wallass was yet again left looking like the true dumbass that we most certainly all know him to be.

Wallass prides himself on being a ‘journalist’ but in fact is a profiteer, of sorts, who deals only in lies and innuendo.  And it was yesterday that ‘Commie Chris,’ host of Fox News Sunday, while broadcasting live from Iowa ahead of the Democrat caucuses, was speaking with Prof. Dershowitz about President Trump’s ongoing impeachment trial in the Senate.  Wallass wrapped up the segment with a question regarding Rudy Giuliani associate Lev Parnas and the ‘2018’ tape that recently surfaced.

It was before playing the tape that Wallass said, “A tape has just been discovered which appears to show a Giuliani associate having a conversation with President Trump back in 2018 about then-U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine Marie Yovanovitch.  Let’s listen to this exchange.”  And it was after the playing of the tape that Prof. Dershowitz responded by saying, “Perfect example of what is not impeachable conduct.”  I would tend to agree, after all, isn’t this kinda old ‘news?’  It was 2018.

“Let me just ask you —” Wallace interrupted before then going on to chastise Prof. Dershowitz, saying, “This works better if I ask the question and you answer it, professor, which is given the fact that President Trump says he doesn’t know him, and you can see what appears to be a discussion back and forth … How damaging do you think that tape is?”  Actually, what would work better would be if the guy asking the questions was not some leftwing political hack disguised as a ‘journalist.’

You know, someone who’s not only able to, but is actually willing to, ask questions that are a little less predictable and who doesn’t get all pissy because their vastly more intelligent interview subject steps on their entirely predictable premise!  Wallass has been on his anti-Trump rant since the very beginning.  And I guess my question to Wallass would be, what difference does it make who President Trump spoke to about firing someone who he had the absolute right to fire?

Anyway, Prof. Dershowitz, who is scheduled to speak today before the Senate on the president’s behalf, attempted to stay on topic.  He said, “I only want to speak to what’s an impeachable offense.”  And he added, “We are not talking the political damage, that’s exactly what voters ought to be deciding on.”  And Prof. Dershowitz continued to argue that the election should be the referendum on President Trump and the people should be the ones to decide whether he stays in office.    

He said, “Voters can take into account that tape, you acknowledge that it’s not an impeachable offense and I would say that much of what was presented by the Democrats were not impeachable offenses, they were campaign ads designed to try to show that you should vote for a different candidate.”  And he said, “That’s fine. Let’s put it up to the voters, let’s not destroy our heritage of our Constitution by expanding the criteria for impeachment beyond that which the framers accepted.”

Wallass is nothing if not a ‘Deep State’ stooge, and is clearly a NeverTrumper.  Just a week or two ago, he said that the Democrat's charges were “serious” when it was already clear that they were BS.  The House has sought to impeach the president while in the possession of zero evidence yet demands that the accused be tried anyway.  Bringing the charges without evidence is prosecutorial misconduct, and they should be punished.  Not one witness supported the House's impeachment with facts.

I think it fair to say that the professor has forgotten more about our Constitution than ‘Commie Chris’ will ever know.  Wallass is another of those faux journalists who are not the least bit concerned with the Constitution regarding this matter, he’s far more interested in simply spreading hearsay.  Prof. Dershowitz simply stuck to the topic at hand and while I do not share his politics I do admire his courage as an American who stands for our Constitution and with any American, not just those who agree with him.

Apparently according to leftwing ‘journalists’ everywhere, the ones like ‘Commie Chris,’ it’s any unnamed jack-a-lope in the mailroom who happens to disagrees with the President's ‘foreign policy’ or choice of ambassador, should be able to completely upend the presidency and nullify one or two national elections.  Wallass was likely one of those kids who routinely got beat up for his lunch money.  If he wasn’t, then he should have been.  He now sees himself as a somebody, but in fact, he’s a nobody.

THE ‘SCHIFF SHOW’ COMES TO A CLOSE…

Whatever the reason, even Adam Schiff, as we get nearer to the end, has told us in his own words what this continuing effort, for three long years, to impeach Donald J. Trump is really all about.  You see it was earlier this week, on Wednesday, that Schiff himself told the Senate during the impeachment proceedings on that it ‘must’ remove President Trump from office and not allow him to run for re-election.  Because if the Senate allows Trump to run for re-election, Schiff insisted, we could not know if the election was “fairly won.”  So is he that certain President Trump is going to win?

Schiff said, “Instead, we are here today to consider a much more grave matter, and that is an attempt to use the powers of the presidency to cheat in an election.”  He said, “For precisely this reason, the president's misconduct cannot be decided at the ballot box, for we cannot be assured that the vote will be fairly won.”  It’s rather odd, don’t you think, to hear a Democrat voicing concern over whether an election “will be fairly won.”  Because, quite frankly, I’ve lost count of how many times, over the years, votes for Democrats have mysteriously materialized out of thin air.

So, if we follow the logic presented to us by ‘Pencil Neck’ Schiff, if President Trump is ‘allowed’ to run, which he most certainly will be, the ONLY way we will know, with any degree of certainty, if the election was in fact “fairly won,” is if he were to be defeated by whichever Democrat loser is selected to run against him.  So just how certain are the Democrats that President Trump will be re-elected.  I would argue that for them to put the country through what it has been put through for roughly three years, they must be pretty certain.  And this is how they plan to prevent that?

It was later in what has been described as being his “passionate” presentation, that Schiff repeated this point saying, “A president this unapologetic, this lawless, this unbound to the Constitution and the oath of office, must be removed from that office lest he continue to use the vast prejudicial powers at his disposal to seek advantage in the next election.”  Look, if at any point during this entire process we were to substitute Barack Obama in every instance where we hear Donald Trump, there would actually be some level of truth to the many claims being made by those like Schiff.

The Democrat Party has always been about those in positions of power within the party being the ones to make all of the political decisions.  Not surprisingly, Schiff's statements reflect this. He essentially is saying the electorate should not to be permitted to choose the president. One of the many ironies in all of this is that Democrat voters consistently, and quite routinely, vote for known criminals.  Look at the last set of Illinois governors. Marion Barry is another example.  In fact being a criminal is usually seen as being a resume enhancer for Democrat candidates. 

Whether Schiff and the Democrats think the American people really are just that stupid, or they actually feel they somehow have the right to dictate who we, as Republicans, can vote for as president, or both, they cannot, they MUST not, be allowed to succeed in this endeavor of theirs that accomplishes nothing more than to stand our Constitution on its head.  Democrats are guilty of nothing less than sedition, some even call it treason.  They are trying to overthrow our government and the president by any and all means, some of very questionable legality.

And what Schiff is essentially saying here is that, “Another impeachment begins November 4, 2020 if President Trump wins.” The Democrats have lost their collective mind. His demand that Republicans remove President Trump from office for the reasons he has stated is beyond crazy.  With zero evidence to support ANY of his insane claims, I have no doubt that President Trump can win re-election. What Schiff and the Democrats are hoping for, and what this charade is truly all about, is to convince enough of the voting public that their accusations are in fact credible.

These ungodly Democrats are scared to death. President Trump has turned America around in many ways, and his re-election should be a no-brainer.  All of their schemes, the purpose of which is to crush America and wipe Christianity off the face of the Earth, have been revealed.  There's still a lot of work to do, and Democrats worry that President Trump will get it done despite resistance coming from Democrats and RINOs.  What they also fear is that their own crimes will come to light and they'll be made to suffer the consequences and that the corrupt deep-state will be stopped.

Schiff, as well as every other member of the Democrat Party, seems to no longer trust this tried and true grand experiment in human freedom.  This November will serve as a referendum regarding the direction the American people wish our country to go.  Do they favor the continued butchering of the unborn, do they support allowing millions to flood into our country illegally and to be provided with free healthcare, do they support the notion of multiple ‘genders’, or ‘Medicare for All’, or any of those things being pushed by those Democrats running for president?  We’ll have to wait and see.

But here's the bottom line.  Democrats know they can’t beat the president with their current cast of clowns. They want the Senate to disallow him his right to run for re-election so they at least have a chance.  I wonder if Democrats can even begin to understand that voters actually think President Trump is doing a good job.  As someone who was reluctant to get on the ‘Trump Train,’ I have been very impressed with what he has been able to get done despite all of the aforementioned resistance. If he had a true Republican House and Senate just think what he’d be able to do.

CHRIS WALLASS BELIEVES PRESIDENT TRUMP IS GUILTY AS CHARGED…

To tell you the truth I’m really beginning to wonder if Chris Wallass might actually be getting paid under the table by the Democrat Party.  I mean, if you’ve spend any amount of time listening to this boob, he’s less of journalist than he is a Democrat spokesperson.  And, for me, why Fox News continues to keeps him around is a real puzzler.  It just goes to show you how the ‘Murdoch boys’ of Fox, are less interested in ratings than they are in ‘fake news,’ as Wallass, the last time I checked, has the lowest rated show on all of Fox News.  So the fact that he remains at the network continues to say much more about those in charge than it does about Wallass himself.

You see it was Wallass who rather passionately argued on Thursday, during his network’s coverage of the impeachment show trial of President Trump, that House managers had made what he described as being a “powerful” case against the president.  Wallass said, “You can say if you think it’s impeachable or not. They have made a powerful case. They have a lot of witnesses. They have a lot of graphics. They have a lot of evidence. I can’t imagine what I have for 16 more hours, and I wonder, to some degree, whether when the White House gets its turn, they are going to be disadvantaged by this because yes, they will have new things to say.”

Wallass then went on to say, “We haven’t heard them nearly as much as we have the House Democrats, but this will be on top of the 24 hours we have already gone through with the House Democrats.”  And he continued, saying, “And I wonder how patient senators are going to be for another 24 hours, although they probably won’t use all of that for the defense of the White House.”  Look, all that the Democrats continue to make very clear is the fact that have hurt feelings and lots and lots of hate.  And it would seem that anyone with half a brain and an open mind (which Wallass has not) can plainly see that President Trump has done nothing wrong.  

So despite all of the enthusiasm that we now see coming from Wallass about this being an open and shut case, the Democrats still have yet to present any actual evidence of a crime or wrong-doing by President Trump.  Again they seem ‘stuck’ on Russia, Russia, Russia even after super sleuth Mueller spent 40 million tax dollars and over two years of digging and came to the conclusion that there was NO collusion and NO obstruction. Schiff has been saying for more than three years that he has ALL the evidence needed to impeach President Trump yet he comes to the Senate and somehow needs more evidence?  Where’s all the evidence he claimed to possess?

Wallass is nothing if not a political hack disguised as a ‘journalist.’  And he’s obviously someone who thinks the Democrats’ hatred of President Trump is somehow sufficient when it comes to forming any sort of a basis for all of this impeachment nonsense.   All he does is to regurgitate childish gossip.  Fox News is again proving itself to be as irresponsible as the other networks in continuing to allow such unprofessional behavior on the part of their ‘journalists.’  Wallass’ interpretations are downright silly. Senators are going to lose patience?  Then what?  Wallass continues to cheerlead for a conviction that he knows is not going occur despite the Democrats’ best efforts.

Keep in mind here that it was Wallass who thought, after hearing the testimony from that nutjob Christine Blasey Ford, that Judge Kavanaugh was toast, yet he sits on the high court today.  Wallass claims that the Democrats “have a lot of evidence.”  But for the life of me I don’t know what he’s talking about.  And while I suppose there might have been a time when I once cared what he had to say, over time I’ve grown rather tired of his bullshit and no longer care what he has to say about anything, especially when it comes to his thoughts regarding the supposed guilt or innocence of President Trump.  It’s obvious that he’s become a sympathizer for the other side.

Wallass is a leftist clown just as his old man was.  He no longer even attempts to play at being “fair and balance” and his willingness to justify an impeachment that came about courtesy of nothing more than hearsay ‘evidence’ makes clear just how much a dupe he’s become.  Abuse of Power?  Really?  Do the Democrats REALLY want to go there with the memory of President Trump’s Democrat predecessor still so fresh in the mind of many Americans?   And just where exactly was Wallass was during all of ‘those’ years?  So we have yet another example of Wallass’ hypocrisy and a reason why he’s no longer worth the time it takes to listen to anything he might have to say. 

Let’s face it, Wallass long ago lost whatever objectivity, or credibility, he may have at one time possessed.  There is simply no case that can be made against the President for ‘abuse of power.’  And something I am quite sure that Wallass is likely aware, it has been throughout our history that just about EVERY president, at some point during his time in office, has been accused by the party in opposition, of having abused his power.  And yet the Democrats, and their cheering section in the media, think President Trump is worthy of impeachment because they perceive him to have abused the power of his office.  It’s pure insanity, driven by hate.  And it’s sad.

Wallass, I think it safe to say, has always hated Donald Trump. I remember that being obvious back when he moderated one of the debates and also on the night they all had to, and rather begrudgingly so, declare that, yes, he had actually defeated Hitlery.  All of the Trump haters are coming out of the woodwork and dancing around with glee because they believe the president is going down.  But I remain confident that their laughter will once again turn to tears when he is acquitted and yet again when he is re-elected.  It’s all so frustrating how Democrats can lie and cheat and exploit and manipulate and steal and can continue to get away with it all.  

And why is that, exactly?  Well it’s because those involved in the media today no longer adhere to what was once deemed to be the purpose of their chosen profession.  That being, of course, to be the watch dog over those in government and in that capacity act as the guardians of our democracy.  But, something you don’t need me to be telling you is that the vast majority of those involved in the media today no longer see that as being their primary mission in life, as ‘journalists.’  What we have today is activist-journalism, with many of those in the media, like Wallass, who see it as being their mission to sway public opinion, essentially by any means necessary.

The only “powerful case” that Wallass and the Democrats have clearly demonstrated, is their now rather extreme case of ‘Trump Derangement Syndrome.’ They have all been driven quite mad, to the point where, because of their hatred of this president, they’ve been driven from the shadows and are now revealing their true leftist selves, something they have worked very hard for decades to keep from ever seeing the light of day. President Trump has done more for our country, in what has been a shorter period of time than any of his predecessors. Yet according to these people he must be destroyed and removed from office.  And it seems to matter not how that gets done.

And finally, it’s anybody with more than a single brain cell that knows Wallass is little more than a ‘useful idiot.’  His only interest, at least when it comes to all things President Trump, seems to be in making it abundantly clear how there is virtually no difference between him and any of the clowns who appear regularly on either the Communist News Network (CNN) or MSDNC, or those who chose to write for such rags as the New York Times or the Washington Post.  President Trump is right when he calls these people out for being our enemy.  Perhaps that’s the reason for their willingness to side with the Democrats in their effort to impeach him.

IMPEACHMENT, WITH EACH NEW DAY IT BECOMES CLEARER WHAT IT’S REALLY ALL ABOUT…

The longer this impeachment sham continues the more obvious it becomes, or at least it should, how the Democrats are desperately pinning on it all their hope of being able to defeat President Trump in the upcoming election.  Because it is, quite literally, all that they have.  And make no mistake, winning is really what this is all about, it’s not about saving the Constitution or the Republic.  Imagine you’re an older American who has been a lifelong Democrat, how is it that you must feel after witnessing your party being reduced to what is nothing more than a carnival freak show?  An odd assortment of lunatics so consumed by their hatred of one man that they appear willing to destroy themselves, and possibly the country, in their attempt to destroy him.

Take for instance good old Charlie Schumer.  It was Charlie who recently told MSDNC’s Rachel Maddow that he thinks that the House impeachment managers, particularly Adam ‘Pencil Neck’ Schiff, are doing “just an incredible, incredible job” in capturing the attention of Republicans, who only “get snippets from Fox News.”  Fox News, is he serious?   He can’t really be talking about the very same network that faux ‘journalists’ with names like Wallass, Baier, Cavuto, Roberts, McCallum and Hemmer now all call home.  Can he?  The same network that hires hacks like Andy Napolitano as a supposed judicial analyst?   Contrary to what Charlie may think, ‘Fox News’ now has quite the cadre of ‘NeverTrumpers’ working there at the network. 

And yet, Charley has no issue whatsoever with either the Communist News Network (CNN) or MSDNC who actually have been behaving in the manner he claims Fox News is.  It has been those two networks that have consistently demonstrated that they are all in, and have been since the beginning, when it comes to impeaching the president, as they continually find fault with everything President Trump says and/or does.  On Thursday, for example, MSDNC's ‘Morning Joe’ reveled in polls indicating that impeachment was actually working against Donald Trump.  Yet Charlie chose to blast the cable network that oddly enough still advertises itself as being “fair and balanced” but does give President Trump some level of credit, at least occasionally. 

And appearing on Maddow’s rating challenged program on Wednesday night, it was fellow MSDNC propagandist Chris Hayes who asked Charlie if there was any truth to media reports that “a notable number of senators” are not in their seats for long stretches of time at the impeachment trial.  He said, “And I just wonder if you feel that the body is living up to the moment on both sides of the aisle, that there's a level of attentiveness and seriousness that you'd like to see.”  Charlie responded, shooting down the reports Hayes mentioned, “I've rarely seen more than ten members out of their seats at a given time, and we've had all members there for most of the time.”  Right, they’re all glued to their seats held in place by all the riveting bloviating.

Charlie said, “The attentiveness that most impresses me is the one I mentioned before, that I think might have the greatest impact, that a lot of our Republican colleagues who have never heard the whole story, have never heard a narrative and have gotten so much of their news from Fox News, which is so deliberately biased and leaves out most of the major facts, is really indicative.  So, no, I think the room is a very, very positive thing, and I was amazed. I look around and a lot of times admittedly the Republicans are sitting in their seats and they're to talk each other, or they're not looking, they don't want to look at it. When Schiff had his last 45 minutes, they were all glued to him, and that says something, I hope and think.”

Charlie made two points about what he described as being Schiff's “tour de force” speech on Wednesday.  He said, “One is, this is the first time many of our Republican colleagues have heard all the facts put together in a very cogent way. Most of them get the snippets from Fox News, which really doesn't tell much of the story at all, and they distort it. But here for the first time they saw the whole thing.  He went on to say, “And when Schiff did his last half hour, his last 45 minutes, they were all intently looking at him. I look around, and most of the time they sort of don't want to hear the argument because of the pressure they're under to go along with Trump.”  Right, they were intently looking at him thinking that he was more than just a little nuts!

Charlie said, “Even though I think a good number of them know in their hearts that he's wrong and that Donald Trump did all the things that were laid out tonight. But tonight they were rapt on him (Schiff). And you never know how this is going to work. Mitch McConnell and Donald Trump will do everything to prevent four people (Republicans) from joining us in our quest for witnesses and documents.”  Charlie said, “But with powerful speeches like Schiff, with Republicans hearing the whole narrative and the whole story for the first time, who knows what happens?”  Now while I didn’t watch any of the proceedings, as I work for a living, I heard there were no ‘powerful’ speeches, all there was, was a lot of idiotic political theater.

Charlie’s second point was, “public pressure matters.”  Democrats are urging the American people to pressure our four wobbly RINOs (Collins, Murkowski, Romney and Gardner) to join the Democrats in demanding witnesses and documents.  He said, “I am very hopeful that what happened tonight will move the public and they will move some Republican senators in our direction.”  And he added, “And it's going to be a process. Am I certain we'll succeed?  Far from it. But do I think there's a chance if we keep at it? Yes.” He said, “But if we don't and it's still apparent to the American public what an unfair trial this is, how they're so afraid of the evidence, it will make the value of an acquittal zero. And so either way, there's a good outcome.”

Charlie said, “But obviously we prefer a fair trial and we'd hope that we can get four Republicans with everything that's happening to be for witnesses and documents. The fact that the public's with us, the fact that they're moving in that direction, may help push Republicans in that direction.”  He noted that Democrats have made “witnesses and documents the central issue” in the Senate trial -- documents and witnesses that the House, in its rush, did not obtain.  He said, “We've won over, as you mentioned, a majority of the American people.  And if we keep pushing and fighting, we may have a chance to actually get them (the four Republicans). I'm not certain. I wouldn't bet all the house on it. But I won't say for sure it's not going to happen either.”

Good ole Charlie Schumer, ever the disingenuous, notoriously unprincipled, America-hating and rabidly leftwing scumbag.  He says that those on his side prefer a “fair trial.”  But what part of this entire, three year-long, witch-hunt has been in any way fair?  And why should we think that at this stage of the game the Democrats are now suddenly concerned about fairness?  That’s ludicrous!  Look back at what these very same Democrats were saying during the impeachment of ‘Slick Willy’ Clinton and the hypocrisy become glaringly obvious.  It’s why they have, and will continue to have, zero credibility regarding this entire charade.  I mean, how stupid does Charlie really think we are?  I may have been born at night, but it certainly wasn’t last night!  

And about these supposed polls that claim to point out how impeachment seems to be gaining some level of traction with the American people.  Now I could be wrong on this but most of the polls that I’ve seen, and I know we should take all polls with a rather sizable grain of salt, make it pretty clear that the ONLY people buying any of this crap are Democrats, despite the fact that no crime has been committed.  Those would the very same crazies who eagerly gobble up all of the rhetoric spewed by Democrats and the ‘fake news.’  And, who knows, Charlie may very well succeed in getting all four of the aforementioned RINOs over to his side, which wouldn’t surprise me in the least.  After all, all four have made clear their dislike for this president.     

Try to imagine, if you can, what we would have seen coming from the Democrats had the Republicans dared to pull on Barry ‘O’ what they are now trying to pull on President Trump.  It was in Barry that we had a man who was, quite possibly, the single most corrupt individual ever to be elected president, and therefore deserving of being impeached.  And while there have been many claims that there was not so much of a whiff of corruption during Barry’s eight year reign, those of us who were paying attention know differently. Barry, however, had a couple of things going for him, he was a Democrat and the Republicans that could have attempted to remove him were too scared to even try out of fear of being called…racist.

And so here we are, with the Democrats again doing what it is that they do, to slander their political opposition knowing full well that their accomplices the ‘fake news’ industry will never, ever call them out on their treachery.  Democrats insist upon making comparisons between President Trump and President Nixon as if there is some similarity between the two men.  But when compared to Barry ‘O,’ Nixon was a saint, as Barry got away with doing things that Nixon would have never dared to have even attempted.  So the one guy who does get impeached is the one guy who has committed virtually no crime.  Well, other than to defeat she who was “the most qualified person ever to run for president,” and therefore not to be defeated.

ONCE AGAIN ‘CROOKED JOE’ SIDES WITH ILLEGALS AND AGAINST THE AMERICAN PEOPLE…

Many who are in the business of ‘reporting’ on such things have long described ex-vice president, and current presidential candidate, ‘Crooked Joe’ Biden, as being the only TRUE moderate Democrat in the ongoing contest to determine just which Democrat genius will be the one to face off against President Trump later this year.  But it’s their definition of “moderate” that would seem to differ considerably from mine.  Because as I see it, as the Democrat contest continues to move forward, what ‘Crooked Joe’ comes across as being is anything but a ‘moderate.’  Because, you see, the “moderate” Democrat long ago went the way of both the dinosaur and the Dodo.

And it was ‘Crooked Joe’ himself who recently made that more than abundantly clear when in a recent interview he rather emphatically stated that his administration would actually fire any Immigration and Customs Enforcement agent who chose to arrest and then deport ILLEGAL immigrants who are not guilty of felony crimes, adding that he doesn't “count drunk-driving as a felony.”  ‘Crooked Joe’ made his insane comments at a Vice News forum on minority issues in Des Moines, Iowa, on Monday evening. This is what we hear coming from the one guy who so many continue to push as being the only reasonable choice among those Democrats now running.  

It was when asked what changes he would bring to the agency as president, ‘Crooked Joe,’ 77 (going on what appears to be 90), said he wants to change the fact that children of ILLEGAL immigrants live in fear that their parents will be arrested and deported.  He said, “They go off to school wondering whether their mom comes and picks them up [or] if she’s not going to be there because an ICE agent was there to arrest her. Or she takes him to the doctor, that she’s going to not be there because she is ‘undocumented’ and an ICE agent is going to pick him up.”  Well then MAYBE mom shouldn’t be in this country, ILLEGALLY.  I mean, I’m just sayin’.

Anyway, ‘Crooked Joe’ then went on to say, “You change the culture by saying you are going to get fired. You are fired if, in fact, you do that. You only arrest for the purpose of dealing with a felony that's committed, and I don't count drunk driving as a felony.”  Look, these people are already breaking the law by simply being in this country, they don’t belong here.  So why is it that when they break any additional laws they aren’t on the very first bus headed south?  What other country on the planet treats those in their country ILLEGALLY in the same manner that we do.  And yet I’m seen as being the bad guy, the RACIST guy, because I want them outta here! 

The sad fact here is that too many Americans have been killed by drunk-driving ILLEGALS, and DUIs are commonplace among ILLEGALS.  For example, in fiscal year 2019, the Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency arrested many thousands of ILLEGALS following DUI charges. The 2019 end-of-year report showed 49,106 criminal convictions for DUIs, alongside 39,717 traffic violations, 47,453 “dangerous drugs” convictions, and 26,156 assault charges.  These people represent a menace that could so very easily be brought to end were it not for corrupt politicians who don’t seem to mind in the least when those in this country ILLEGALLY, kill American citizens.

It was shortly after ‘Crooked Joe’ made his ludicrous comments that Mothers Against Drunk Driving (MADD) issued this statement:

Drunk driving is the Number 1 killer on America’s roads and a violent crime that MADD believes should be punished to the fullest extent of the law, regardless of the offender’s immigration status.

Drunk driving laws differ by state, and the fact that only four states charge a felony for a non-injury second drunk driving offense illustrates the enormous challenge MADD faces in helping to pass laws that will eliminate the horrible tragedies caused by drunk driving. In all drunk driving cases, MADD supports the victims and their wishes in the prosecution and sentencing of offenders who kill or injure someone.

For example, the roughly 800,000 younger ILLEGALS who got DACA work permits from ex-president Barry ‘O’ included 4,210 ILLEGALS with drunk-driving arrests.   Sanctuary state officials routinely release many drunk-driving ILLEGALS back into an unsuspecting public in California, as well as any number of other states, and immigration lawyers argue that DUIs are insufficient to justify the deportation of ILLEGALS, despite the fact that these people are in our country, ILLEGALLY!!!!!  Many ILLEGALS are charged with DUIs, so helping ICE identify them in jail and accelerate their deportation.  But that’s now apparently a no-no for those like ‘Crooked Joe.’

In May 2017 an ILLEGAL by the name of Oscar De La Rosa-Mendoza, 31, reportedly pled guilty to driving while intoxicated, as well as resisting arrest from local police after they had had the audacity to pull him over.  And this particular ILLEGAL had already been deported seven times.  Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) Removal Operations (ERO) officers arrested 25 ILLEGAL immigrants in Long Island, New York [of whom] 24 were convicted of driving under the influence of drugs or alcohol.  And I think it safe to say that ‘Crooked Joe’ is totally opposed to these ILLEGALS being pulled over in the first place. And he wants to be president?

Our so-called ‘leaders’ choose to allow this insanity to continue with absolutely no regard, whatsoever, for public safety.  Those who are victims of this ILLEGAL scum have no legal recourse because ILLEGALS never have insurance.  Allowing these ILLEGALS to drive around does nothing more than to put all of us at risk. But none of that seems to matter to those like ‘Crooked Joe.’  When we American citizens cross over into Mexico, we have to show proof of insurance.  When Mexican citizens cross over into the United States they’re able to drive pretty much wherever they want and with no insurance.  And when stopped by the police, they are to be sent on their way.

So, since not a single Democrat, regardless of the office held, actually represents the citizens of the United States, should that not disqualify them from holding any public office?  Seriously, why should any rational American citizen vote for any Democrat? Drunk drivers ‘murder’ over 10,000 people annually in the U.S.  It’s considered a homicide under the law and as it’s a decision to drink and drive, it’s no accident. There’s almost as many drunk-driving homicides as homicides involving every type of gun.  Less than 300 homicides involved the use of any type of rifle in 2018 per the FBI crime stats. So why doesn’t ‘Crooked Joe’ care to save American lives?

At some point the American people must stop referring to those whom we elect as our supposed ‘leaders’ as anything but ‘leaders.’  They claim to care about public safety and yet, like ‘Crooked Joe,’ seem interested only in continuing to put the public at even greater risk by allowing those who have no business being in this country in the first place to break additional laws and then allowed to go free with virtually no punishment, whatsoever, being administered.  If you or I were caught drunk-driving, and God forbid killed someone, would we be afforded the very same treatment?  Of course not.  We would go directly to the nearest prison for a very long time.  

And you know, with all of the calls for the destruction of those institutions that allow our country to function, and calls for the outright shredding of our Constitution, calls for unlawful imprisonment and forced re-education of those with opposing political views and the of those who head both insurance companies as well as companies involved in the production of fossil fuels by the leftist Socialist Democrats, why hasn't today's Democrat Party been labeled an actual terrorist organization?  No actions, legal and illegal, are off the table in their quest to usurp legal elections, seize the reins of power, and to “fundamentality transform” America as we know it.

Finally, it’s at the risk of being accused of being heartless that, while I dislike wishing ill will on anyone, even a Democrat, I sincerely hope that there comes a time when ‘Crooked Joe’ experiences what it’s like to have a family member taken out by a drunk driving ILLEGAL.  Because it’s then, and only then, that he will be able to tell us how driving-drunk is not a serious crime.  Of all the things this moron has said this has got to be the stupidest.  And you would think that someone who has already lost someone in a senseless motor vehicle accident would be a bit more sympathetic toward those who have lost someone on such a manner, but nope.  It’s all about politics.