Thursday, December 27, 2012

ONE MAN'S VACATION IS ANOTHER MAN'S...

BARRY STRESSING OVER THE 'FISCAL CLIFF'
Our "Lord and Savior," Barack Obama, just-completed his portion of what has been described as being a 'family vacation', heading home after five days or roughly 120 hours. This little respite of his, having taken place in that little known part of Asia, known as Hawaii, was the vacation many guys can only dream about. But I think Barry differs from most in that, because while there was a rather intense focus on recreation alone or with the guys, there was a relatively light schedule of actual family-oriented events.

Barry played golf three out of the five days he was on Oahu, engaging in marathon sessions of up to six hours for a total of about 17 hours our on the course. He spent another three or four hours 'toning' up in the gym. No doubt he views all of this relaxation as his way of dealing with the rigors of his office, but it also makes quite clear his lack of any deep concern regarding the consequences to be faced by everyday folks should we actually make the plunge over that much talked about fiscal cliff.

Anyway, by contrast, our 'Dear Beloved Leader' spent about two hours on the beach with Queen Michelle and the kids, and another couple of hours hiking with them. While this weird little family unit certainly got some quality time in while at their rather exclusive vacation home, most of the fun stuff was to be had by the head dude and his assorted posse. On both Monday and Wednesday, the family barely got to see Barry until sometime after 3:00 pm, when he had finished his workouts and rounds of golf.

Wednesday’s little golf outing was Barry's 19th of 2012 and the 111th of his presidency and it featured longtime pals Bobby Titcomb, Mike Ramos, and Greg Orme, the same posse that was with him when he was out on the course on Monday. But alas, our 'Fearless Leader' returned back to the 'grind' late this morning, back in Washington where his new 'pal' will be Speaker John Boehner, whom Barry hopes to bully and threaten into coming around to his way of averting the fiscal cliff, by simply raising taxes.

Wednesday, December 26, 2012

AND THE CLIFF EDGES CLOSER…OR WE EDGE CLOSER TO IT…EITHER WAY...



Well here's a little something that shouldn't come as a very big surprise to anyone with a brain and who has been paying even the least amount of attention to what's been going on here, unless of course you're Barry "Almighty" or nearly any congressional Democrat. The Social Security program ran a $47.8 Billion deficit in fiscal 2012 as the program brought in $725.429 Billion in while paying out $773.247 for benefits and overhead expenses. And that ain't just me saying who's pointing that out, that's coming straight from the official data published by Social Security Administration.

The Social Security Administration also released some rather interesting new data which revealed that the number of supposed workers now collecting disability benefits has managed to hit the pretty remarkable record of 8,827,795 in December, and that's up from 8,805,353 in November. The overall number of Social Security program beneficiaries—including retired workers, dependent family members and survivors and disabled workers and their dependent family members—also hit a record in December, climbing from 56,658,978 in November to 56,758,185 in December.

In 2011, and according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, there was an average of 112.556 million full-time workers in the United States, of whom 17.806 million worked full-time for local, state or federal government. That left an average of only 94.750 million full-time private sector workers in the rest of the country. For all of you dim-witted liberals what that equates to is that now for every 1.67 Americans who worked full-time in the private sector in 2011, there is now 1 person collecting benefits from the Social Security administration. Now how does that make sense to anybody but a unionized government worker?

Despite its fiscal 2012 "net cash flow" deficit, as Social Security Administration (SSA) describes it, the agency was able to book an on-paper "increase" of $64.580 Billion in the Social Security Trust Funds. That, SSA says, is because the U.S. Treasury "paid" the trust funds $112.398 in "interest" in fiscal 2012 on the historical surpluses in Social Security taxes that the Treasury siphoned off to cover other spending by the federal government. As of the end of calendar year 2011, according to SSA, the Social Security Trust Fund equaled approximately $2.678 Trillion.

The last time the Social Security program actually ran a "net cash flow" surplus was in fiscal 2009. In that year, Social Security’s revenues exceeded its benefit and overhead payments by $19.358 billion. You might also remember that that was year one of the Barry "Almighty" presidency. Because what followed in fiscal 2010 is that Social Security ran a $36.8 Billion DEFICIT; and, in fiscal 2011, it ran a $47.975 Billion DEFICIT. Anybody other than me see the nasty little trend developing here? I mean, come on folks, this ain't rocket science or brain surgery. It's simple economics.

For those who don't know, there are two Social Security Trust Funds: the Old Age and Survivors Insurance Trust Fund and the Disability Insurance Trust Fund. The OASI Trust Fund covers benefits to retired workers and their families and deceased workers families. The DI Trust fund covers benefits to disabled workers and their families. The trust funds are required 'by law' to hand over all surplus revenues to the Treasury and the Treasury then provides "special issue" non-marketable bonds, which are essentially nothing more than electronic IOUs, to the trust funds in return for the cash.

These so-called "IOUs" then become part of the national debt. When the Treasury pays "interest" that increases the value of the Social Security Trust Funds it does so by increasing the number of IOUs it owes the trust funds. When the Social Security program runs a net cash flow deficit, as it has in the last three fiscal years, the Treasury needs to borrow cash from the "public" to keep the program funded. As of Dec. 21, the federal government’s debt was $16.336 Trillion. If this all sounds pretty insane, that's only because it is. But it's our own fault because this is what we've allowed those in Washington to get away with for decades.

SAM DONALDSON ISSUES WARNING TO TEA PARTY FOLKS...


WELL, AIN'T THAT MIGHTY 'WHITE' OF OBAMA?



So while, at least up to this point, Barry "Almighty" has been busy performing his best, and rather personal, rendition of Nero fiddling while Rome burns, he has apparently now decided to cut his taxpayer funded Christmas vacation short and head home. His doing so allows him to, at least, appear to be interested in averting that much talked about headlong plunge over the 'fiscal cliff.' So with a yearend deadline now just around the corner and with us being no closer to reaching any sort of a meaningful 'deal' that would prevent us from going over, Barry is now said to be heading back to Washington. Big freakin deal!

According to those stellar folks in the White House, Barry is expected to arrive back in Washington early Thursday. Of course, Queen Michelle and the couple's two daughters will remain in Hawaii until Jan. 6. In the past, Barry's end-of-the-year holiday in his 'native' state have stretched well into the new year. The first family left Washington last Friday night. Congress is expected to return to Washington on Thursday. Let's be honest here, what, if anything, can we expect to take place with them in town that wouldn't have with them all being out of town? Especially when all the Democrats want is higher taxes.

Without some sort of action by Barry and Congress, automatic budget cuts and tax increases are set to begin in January, which many economists say 'could' send the country back into recession. Back into a recession? So far, Barry and congressional Republicans have been unable to reach agreement on any alternatives. Lawmakers have expressed little but pessimism for the prospect of an agreement coming before Jan. 1. On Sunday, Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison, (RINO), said she expects any action in the waning days of the year to be "a patch because in four days we can't solve everything." Can't or won't?

With Barry essentially laughing off Speaker John Boehner's plan to allow tax rates to rise on million-dollar-plus incomes, lawmakers are becoming increasingly worried that no deal can be reached. They are already preparing their arguments about who will be to blame if the new year comes without an agreement. Personally I see that as being a no brainer, it's the moron in the Oval Office. Barry already has scaled back his ambitions for a sweeping budget bargain. Before leaving the capital on Friday, he called for a limited measure that extends Bush-era tax cuts for most people and staves off federal spending cuts.

Barry and family were spending the holiday at a rented home near Honolulu. On Christmas Day, hoping for a nice little photo op, no doubt, they took time out of their very busy schedule to put in an appearance with members of the military in order to express thanks for their service. While at the Marine Corps Base Hawaii's Anderson Hall, Barry actually said, "One of my favorite things is always coming to base on Christmas Day just to meet you and say 'thank you.'" He went on to say that being commander in chief was his greatest honor as president. What a load of crap, he hates the military!

Look, anything that Barry does is meant to do one thing and one thing only. And that is to do nothing more than to create the false impression that he genuinely does not want us to go over the cliff. How many really believe that he cares one iota if he'll be blamed when things get worse? He couldn't care less, he wants things to get worse, he's on a mission here to wreak as much havoc as he possibly can. His goal to lay waste to the economic system that provides the most opportunity that then allows the most people to become the most prosperous. And hence not need government. He wants people to need government.

Tuesday, December 25, 2012

ANOTHER EXAMPLE OF WHY GUNS ‘ARE NOT’ THE PROBLEM…

 
 
So in this country while the Democrats, and many in our state-controlled media, are busy making the idiotic claim that only if we had stricter gun control laws, such tragedies as the recent shooting in Newtown would never happen, we have had another incident which proves the point that that just ain’t so. Because, in what is yet another example of the creativity of someone who is determined to create a body count point, we have another case in China where a man angered by a court ruling in the murder of his daughter, rammed a car loaded with a gas tank and firecrackers into a group of middle schoolers. This most recent ‘attack’ injured 13 in that country's latest attack on students. The man succeeded in running down 23 students at Fengning No. 1 Middle School in northern China's Hebei province on Monday, the official Xinhua News Agency said Tuesday, citing local police.
 
 
The Xinhua News Agency said that the man, identified as 48-year-old Yin Tiejun, later lit a bottle of diesel in an attempt to set his car on fire. Police put out the fire and found the gas tank and firecrackers in the trunk of the car, but Xinhua said Yin told police in an interrogation later that the materials were not meant for an attack. Yin has been detained on charges of endangering public safety, Xinhua also noted. Xinhua went on to describe Yin as having been upset for years that a court did not sentence to death all four assailants involved in the murder of his daughter three years ago. The report did not give further details of the murder but did say that the children hurt in Monday's car crash were not tied to the case. Xinhua also said the man did not act as if he was under the influence of either alcohol or drugs. Students were hospitalized with injuries that included skull fractures and crushed feet, Xinhua said.
 
 
The local Fengning county government confirmed the incident in a written statement. Eyewitnesses present said the accident occurred when students were leaving school for noon break and that the car accelerated and knocked down students, many of whom were on bikes. Now I’m sure most remember how it was on December 14 that a Chinese man took a kitchen knife and went on a stabbing spree that left 23 students wounded in an elementary school in Henan province. My point here is that China, where folks can’t own guns, there have been more than a half-dozen such school attacks in less than three years, though the death tolls have been low, largely because knives have been the most-used weapon. But as Democrats in this country are quite fond of saying whenever attempting to justify their calls for stricter gun control, even one death that could have been prevented is too many.


Monday, December 24, 2012

OBAMA AND OTHER ELITES MAKE SURE ‘THEIR’ KIDS ARE SAFE…



As the talk continues about the ‘need’ for stricter gun control laws, we now have yet another example of something that, while being good for Barry, apparently isn’t good for the rest of us. You see some rather interesting news that has come to light in the wake of what is the latest push for gun control being pursued by Barry and his posse of fellow gun control nuts in Congress. It seems that our "Lord and Savior," Barack Obama sends his own kids to a school where armed guards are used. And yet, that opportunity is something denied to most of us regular folks.

And strangely enough, as part of its standard operating procedure, this particular little school, Sidwell Friends School in Washington, DC, actually has 11 fulltime security officers and is currently seeking to hire a new police officer as we speak here. Now I suppose, if you’re one of those liberal gun control fanatics, you could attempt to simply dismiss this by saying, "Of course they have armed guards -- they get Secret Service protection." But if you do that, then I’m afraid you've missed the larger point.

That larger point being, of course, that this is essentially standard operating procedure for this particular school, period. And this is also the reason that people like NBC's David Gregory send their kids to Sidwell, they know their kids will be protected from the carnage that befell kids at government schools where armed guards aren't used and aren't even allowed. Yup, that would be the same David Gregory who ridiculed Wayne LaPierre for even suggesting the placing of armed policemen in schools.

So now we have our pathetic president, as well as an army of hypocrites in our state-controlled media and in Hollywood, very busy advocating more stricter gun control laws while at the same time trying to prevent the parents of other school children from doing what he, and others who send their kids to these private schools, have clearly done for their own kids. Their children sit under the protection that guns afford, while the children of regular Americans remained exposed and perhaps sacrificed at the altar of the liberal agenda.

THE DIFFERING CHRISTMAS MESSAGES FROM THE MIDDLE EAST....

FROM ISRAEL
 
 
FROM THE PALESTINIANS


Sunday, December 23, 2012

HERE'S WISHING YOU ALL A VERY MERRY CHRISTMAS!!



I would like to take this opportunity to wish all of those who may stop by here, from time to time, and who perhaps choose to take part in the conversation, a very Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year. And as our New Year’s resolution let us all say a little prayer for our country, because I think she’s going to be needing it if we are to have any hope of surviving the next four years. Sadly, many have lost faith in those things that made this country great, and they have allowed themselves to be convinced by corrupt, power hungry, politicians to be envious of others, and to blame others for their own misfortunes that were brought about by their own recklessness or bad decisions. We as a people must move back, back to where we view such traits as personal responsibility and self-reliance not as being flaws that reveal weakness, but, instead, as ingredients necessary if one is to possess a strong moral character. Because if we are to have any hope of saving ourselves and our country from that which appears to be near certain, and very dark, end, we will first need to learn the value and the importance of such things. So in the spirit of the season let me just say, may God bless you all, and may God bless America.

RIGHT, NOW THERE'S A COMMONSENSE SOLUTION...START PROFILING WHITE GUYS...



Is this not some of the most idiotic drivel you've ever heard? Our state-controlled media continues to prove itself, every single day, that it deserves, just a little less, to be taken seriously. Those whom we are supposed to be able to trust and to rely upon as being accurate providers of news and information have demonstrated time and again that that, apparently is somthing that they are no longer interested in. Instead, they see themselves as being social advocates of one type or another and as being nothing more than a wholly owned subsidiary of the Democrat Party.

IN SPITE OF WHAT THE DEMOCRATS AND THE MEDIA WOULD HAVE YOU THINK, GUNS ARE NOT THE LEADING CAUSE OF DEATH IN AMERICA…



Once again Democrats, backed up by their many minions in the state-controlled media, are very busy at work trying to seize upon the emotion of a tragedy. They are once again desperately trying to justify their claims that if we could only increase gun control laws, literally 10’s of thousands of lives would be saved every single year. But what this is, is nothing more than another effort of theirs to further a sinister political agenda that, if we allow it to continue, will further reduce the level of freedom that each one of us enjoy here in these United States. We Americans are a very shortsighted bunch, as we have this tendency of losing sight of what is the big picture. And sleazy Democrats, as well as many of those in our state-controlled media, are only too happy to attempt to use that affliction, as they try to manipulate us into going along with their drive to curb yet another of what are our Constitutional ‘rights.’

Just imagine for a minute how it is that 90,000 Americans die in a hospital every single year. Or one American dies in a hospital from a medical error or a lethal infection every 6 minutes. Apparently, Americans are much safer at home where 54,500 Americans die every year, or one American is killed in an accident at home every 10 minutes. And things are nearly as bad on our highways where 46,844 are killed every year, or one American killed by a traffic accident every 11 minutes. And believe it or not, 40,059 die every year from poisoning, or one American accidentally poisoned to death every 13 minutes. Falls kill 22,631 Americans every year, or one American killed in a fall every 23 minutes. Drunk driving kills 10,288 Americans every year with 28 Americans getting killed every day, while drowning kills 3,443 Americans a year, or 9 Americans every day. Homicide 18,361 One American murdered every 29 minutes.

Back 2009, which were the most recent statistics that I could find regarding the total number of deaths caused by various diseases, the total number of deaths in the United States stood at 2,437,163. At that time there were 793.8 deaths per 100,000 population, life expectancy was 78.5 years and the infant Mortality rate: 6.39 deaths per 1,000 live births. At that time the number of deaths and the leading causes were: 1) Heart disease: 599,413, 2) Cancer: 567,628, 3) Chronic lower respiratory diseases: 137,353, 4) Stroke (cerebrovascular diseases): 128,842, 4) Accidents (unintentional injuries): 118,021, 5) Alzheimer's disease: 79,003, 6) Diabetes: 68,705, 7) Influenza and Pneumonia: 53,692, 8) Nephritis, nephrotic syndrome, and nephrosis: 48,935, and 9) Intentional self-harm (suicide): 36,909.

Now granted, any death that could somehow have been prevented is always a tragedy. But having said that, don’t you think it just a bit unseemly for politicians to so obviously seek ways to exploit that tragedy for no other reason than to further their specific political agenda? Over the years we have time and again seen how Democrats can be quite skilled in their attempts to create Constitutional rights where none exist, while that the same time working feverishly to squelch those rights that are made quite clear in the words as they are written. And what we are now witnessing, once again, is yet another attempt by Democrats, and a very liberal media acting as their willing accomplices, to use another tragedy as a way to circumvent that which the Constitution says is one of our rights as Americans. And isn’t it sad that they mourn not for the children who lost their lives, but seek to use their needless deaths as a political tool?

AN ARROGANT DAVID GREGORY MADE TO LOOK PRETTY STUPID BY LAPIERRE....


SO, JUST HOW BIG OF AN ASSHOLE IS OBAMA?



Apparently, I’d say, he’s a pretty big one. You see, a Wall Street Journal report detailing the broken-down status of talks between, he who has been described as being our "Lord and Savior," Barack Obama and House Speaker John Boehner on the year-end "fiscal cliff" reveals that Barry threatened to use both his inaugural and State of the Union speeches to do nothing more than to blame Republicans if there’s no deal. But his having made such a threat should really come as no surprise to anyone. After all, to Barry, this is how politics is supposed to work. Look at the disgustingly sleazy smear campaign he used against Romney based on what was an endless series of, what were nothing but Axelrod created, lies. Combined with voter fraud on a massive scale, and Barry was able to win, again.

Negotiations reportedly came to a standstill after Boehner proposed increasing the tax rate on top earners: "Mr. Obama repeatedly lost patience with the speaker as negotiations faltered. In an Oval Office meeting last week, he told Mr. Boehner that if the sides didn’t reach agreement, he would use his inaugural address and his State of the Union speech to tell the country the Republicans were at fault. At one point, according to notes taken by a participant, Mr. Boehner told the president, "I put $800 billion [in tax revenue] on the table. What do I get for that?" "You get nothing," the president said. "I get that for free.""

And according to Politico, Barry was referring to Rep. Tom Cole (R-Okla.) and Senate Republicans who had already said they would be open to tax rate increases and therefore he didn’t need to concede anything. Barry has been buoyed by his election victory, using it as an opportunity to remind Boehner he has the upper hand: "Mr. Obama insisted on raising tax rates for those with household income above $250,000. The House GOP wanted significant spending cuts and fundamental changes to Medicare and other entitlement programs in exchange for new tax revenue. The president repeatedly reminded Mr. Boehner of the election results: "You’re asking me to accept Mitt Romney’s tax plan. Why would I do that?""

Barry and family have since headed off to Hawaii for their $4 Million Christmas vacation for which we the taxpayers are supposed to gladly cover the cost. But before departing on Friday, he said he was still confident the two sides could reach a "comprehensive deal" after using the holidays as, what he called, a cooling-off period. Boehner used the weekly Republican address to say the House had done all it could to avert the cliff and that it was now down to Barry to come up with a "balanced" approach. But in order for him to do that, Barry would first need to possess an interest in doing so. And he doesn’t, it’s just that simple. Nothing will make him happier that to successfully steer us right over the cliff. After all, he has, repeatedly, made that quite clear.

Saturday, December 22, 2012

OBAMA, TAKING NARCISSISM TO A WHOLE NEW LEVEL…

 
 
If there is one thing that we have come to recognize about Barry "Almighty," it’s the fact that he’s never been the least bit shy about blowing his own horn. Barry recent took advantage of yet another impromptu occasion, this one the funeral for Hawaii senator Daniel Inouye, to talk about pretty much nothing but, himself. In a short, for Barry, 1,600 word speech, he used the word "my" 21 times, "me" 12 times, and "I" 30 times. Personally, I was never a very big fan of Inouye, to me he was just another liberal who saw more wrong with America than all that was right. And as such, I suppose there will be many who will miss him, but I most certainly will not. It’s because of politicians like him that our country is now struggling. But still, that doesn’t alter the fact that Barry wasn’t there to talk about himself.
 
 
Barry's speech discussed how it was that Inouye had first gotten him interested in politics. "Danny was elected to the U.S. Senate when I was two years old," Barry said. Speaking to the audience at the National Cathedral in Washington, D.C., Barry talked at length about his family and their vacations. "Now, even though my mother and grandparents took great pride that they had voted for him, I confess that I wasn't paying much attention to the United States Senate at the age of four or five or six. It wasn't until I was 11 years old that I recall even learning what a U.S. senator was, or it registering, at least. It was during my summer vacation with my family -- my first trip to what those of us in Hawaii call the Mainland," Barry said. So on and on it went, no doubt causing many to wonder why they were there.
 
 
Barry did take at least a few moments to mention what many describe as being the heroic life of Inouye. "And so we remember a man who inspired all of us with his courage, and moved us with his compassion, that inspired us with his integrity, and who taught so many of us -- including a young kid growing up in Hawaii –-- that America has a place for everyone," Barry concluded. Look, for all of those out there who seem to think Barry is such a prince of a guy, don’t you see it as being just a little unseemly to capitalize on a ceremony meant to honor an individual who has passed on, to do nothing more than to talk about yourself? I mean, how arrogant can one person be, to see it as being anywhere near appropriate to take every opportunity in front of nearly any crowd to talk about how great you think you are?


JUST IN CASE YOU THOUGHT OUR FOREIGN POLICY WOULD IMPROVE...



So it now becomes official, we move beyond the inept Hillary Clinton, to the incompetent boob, John Kerry-Heinz.  American foreign policy will continue in the manner where it will no doubt prove, even more so, to be the type of operation that would make Curly, Larry and Moe very proud. 

AN APOPLECTIC 'LOW-RENTS' O'DONNELL GOES OFF ON THE NRA...


JERROLD ‘PUMPKIN HEAD’ ADLER’S IN FAVOR OF THE GOVERNMENT TAKING YOUR GUN…



Rep. Jerrold ‘Pumpkin Head’ Nadler, New York Democrat, has now come out and said that only the federal government should have "high-capacity" gun magazines and that the "state ought to have a monopoly on legitimate violence." Huh? Now doesn’t that just give every freedom loving American a warm and fuzzy feelin? His idiotic proclamation came during a recent Capitol Hill press conference where this imbecilic Nadler, gathered with some of his fellow House Democrats, came to push for stricter gun control in the wake of last week’s shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Conn. These clowns, like Barry are now expending much energy in working to do nothing more than to exploit the death of 20 children.

Old ‘Pumpkin Head’ made the comment that he not only supports prohibiting the future sale of 10-round gun magazines, but he would like to see the government confiscate all high-capacity clips already ‘legally’ possessed by American citizens. It was after this little gathering of anti-gun politicians that Nadler was then asked if the shooting massacre at the Ft. Hood military base back in 2009 would have been prevented by the legislation that he now supports. On Nov. 5, 2009 Maj. Nidal Hasan, a radical Muslim nut, disguised as an Army psychiatrist, used an FN Five-Seven semi-automatic handgun, which can hold 11 to 31 rounds, to unload on the military base after reportedly shouting "Allahu Akbar," or "God is Great" in Arabic.

‘Pumpkin Head’ was asked. "Would banning high-capacity clips at Ft. Hood have prevented Maj. Nidal Hasan from killing 13 people and wounding 29 others?" This moron, Adler, responded saying, "I don’t know. It might have." It might have? He added. "Certainly, it was on a military base and he may or may not have had authority to use military weapons. I don’t know whether he did or not." He then said, "But the point of all this is not that we can prevent every single murder, [or] we can prevent every single even mass murder, but we can reduce it greatly." Adding "You know, no one would say we shouldn’t use penicillin because some people still die of infections, but a lot fewer do because we have penicillin and other wonder drugs." Huh?

Doing what Democrat do best, make up ‘facts’ as they go along, Nadler continued, "Now, the fact of the matter is that Germany has 150 or so people killed a year with guns; Canada, 170; the United States 9,000 to 10,000 a year. We have a murder rate with guns that are 15 to 20 times higher than any other industrialized country. There’s only one explanation and that’s the availability, the easy availability of assault weapons and of high-capacity clips." He said, "Now, last Friday we lost 20 children and six adults murdered in a Connecticut school." Adding, "Last Friday a madman attacked a school in China, an elementary school in China. Twenty-two kids were injured, but none killed because he had a knife, not an assault rifle. That’s the difference."

Then this buffoon was asked, "But if a bill was brought up and passed to ban high-capacity clips would the military still be allowed to use them?" Nadler answered, "Of course, the military would be allowed to use them." Nadler was then asked, "So only the government would be allowed to have high-capacity clips?" To which he responded, "Yes." He then went on to say, "Well, I think the legislation doesn’t ban existing ones but -- although I would like to do that, too." Adding, "But I think the legislation we’re talking about would prohibit the sale and probably manufacturer sale of high-capacity clips in the future, not those that are in private possession today." Nadler added, "But let me say, yes."

Adler then said, "One of the definitions of a nation state is that the state has a monopoly on legitimate violence. And the state ought to have a monopoly on legitimate violence." And added, "If the premise of your question is that people are going to resist a tyrannical government by shooting machine guns at American troops, that’s insane." Since Sandy Hook, Barry "Almighty" along with many of his fellow Democrats have been busily urging the need for action to be taken for stricter gun control. And we have heard Barry say that he will use "whatever power" his office holds to prevent mass shootings in the future. And at the prayer vigil for the Sandy Hook shooting on Sunday, Barry mentioned the shootings in Aurora, Co., Oak Creek, Wis., and Tuscon, Ariz., but strangely didn’t bother to mention the Ft. Hood massacre.

At Wednesday’s press conference, Nadler and Nancy ‘Too Much Botox’ Pelosi, in the company of several other Democrats, advocated for a bill introduced by Carolyn McCarthy and Diana DeGette, two other anti-gun Democrats, that would ban magazines for more than 10 rounds of ammunition. The bill would also prohibit the transfer, possession or importation of those magazines that are manufactured after the date of the law being signed. This idiot Nadler even went so far as to call the National Rifle Association (NRA) "enablers of mass murder." Let’s be honest here, the only enablers here are the very ones who are now very energetically working overtime to dream up ever newer and more inventive ways to rewrite our Constitution.

"We have a lobby, the leadership of the NRA, who function as enablers of mass murder," Nadler told Communist News Network (CNN) Host Piers Morgan. "And that's what they are. They're enablers of mass murder because they terrify the class of political people. And even though polling shows that most NRA members would support reasonable gun controls, every time someone proposes it, they come in." His rant continued, "They lie. They say they will take your guns away." Saying finally, "And they stop any kind of legislation to prevent that." As is most always the case when dealing with Democrats, nothing that is guy says has any basis in actual fact. He is so desperate he’ll say absolutely anything in an effort to ‘prove’ his point!

BILL AYERS EXPLAINS THE LEFT'S QUEST FOR OUR KIDS...


Friday, December 21, 2012

OBAMA SAYS HE’S A HOPELESS OPTIMIST…SURE HE IS…


Once again on Friday, our "Lord and Savior", Barack Obama reaffirmed the fact that he would not agree to any budget deal that doesn’t include higher taxes on the "wealthiest individuals." Republicans and Democrats, Barry said, can agree to a "balanced proposal that cuts spending, but also asks the wealthiest Americans to pay more." He rambled on, lying through his pearly white, saying, "During the course of these negotiations I offered to compromise with Republicans in Congress. I met them halfway on taxes, and I met them more than half way on spending, terms of actual dollar amounts, we’re not that far apart." Barry must have a rather odd way of defining ‘compromise’, because he’s done nothing more than to make it quite clear, throughout the entire ‘discussion’ thus far, that it’s going to have to be his way or no way. That’s just how Barry plays the game.

And then in telling us what most of us already know, Barry then proceeded to warn that if Congress fails to agree on a budget deal, the financial ramifications will be felt by everyone. "[E]ven though Democrats and Republicans are arguing about whether … rates should go up for the wealthiest individuals, all of us, every single one of us, agrees that tax rates shouldn’t go up for the other 98 percent of Americans, which includes 97 percent of small businesses," he said. Adding, "Every member of Congress believes that, every Democrat, every Republican. So there is absolutely no reason — none — not to protect these Americans from a tax hike." But here Barry lies to us yet again in his making the claim that 97 percent of all small businesses are included in those who $250,000 or less. That’s just not true, and Barry’s continuing to say it, as well as those in the media repeating it ad nauseam, isn’t gonna make it true!

"At the very least, let’s agree right now on what we already agree on. Let’s get that done."  Barry continued, urging Republicans and Democrats to come up with a plan they can both agree on. But in making such an idiotic statement, he ignores completely the fact that Senate Democrats aren’t willing to agree to anything. Barry went on to say, "Averting this middle class tax hike is not a Democratic or Republican responsibility. With their votes, the American people have determined that governing is a shared responsibility between both parties." He added, "In this Congress, laws can only pass with support from Democrats and Republicans. And that means nobody gets 100 percent of what they want. Everybody’s gotta give a little bit in a sensible way. We move forward together, or we do not move forward at all." But the fact is that it’s Barry who will be the one to decide on how it is that we move ‘forward.’

Because in his saying that nobody ever gets 100 percent of what they want, he most certainly can’t be referring to himself, because, after all, he fully expects to get everything he wants and then some. Barry went on to ask that members of both parties use their Christmas vacation to reflect on the problems facing the nation. "I hope it gives everybody some perspective. Everybody can cool off," he said. He recommended, "Everybody can drink some eggnog, have some Christmas cookies, sing — sing some Christmas carols, enjoy the company of loved ones." He then promptly jetted off to Hawaii on his $4 Million vacation and all at taxpayer expense, a fact that demonstrates more clearly that just about anything else, the fact that the looming fiscal cliff doesn’t bother him anymore than a cloudy day. Barry is nothing more than a political charlatan, one who feel he is completely justified in saying anything he must in getting what he wants.

Barry challenged Congress one last time to come up with a plan: "We’re going to have to find some common ground. And the challenge that we’ve got right now is that the American people are a lot more sensible and a lot more thoughtful, and much more willing to compromise and give and sacrifice and act responsibly than their elected representatives are. And that’s a problem. There’s a mismatch right now between how everybody else is thinking about these problems, Democrats and Republicans, outside of this town and how folks are operating here. And we’ve just got to get that aligned, and we’ve only got 10 days to do it. So I hope that every member of Congress is thinking about that. Nobody can get 100 percent of what they want. And this is not simply a contest between parties in terms of who looks good and who doesn’t." "So call me a hopeless optimist, but I actually still think we can get it done," Barry concluded.

Look, let’s not fool ourselves here, if there is one certainty in all of this talk about averting the big plunge over the ‘fiscal cliff’, it’s that Barry is perfectly content to go right on over the edge. In fact he wants us to go over the cliff because doing so gives to him nearly everything he wants, higher taxes and spending cuts. So all of this talk about being some sort of an optimist about some sort of deal being reached, is nothing more than another example of what has become Barry’s very typical brand of bullshit! The only way that any sort of a deal will ever be reached will be if the Republicans capitulate completely on taxes and demand no spending cuts be made in exchange. And, sadly, with Boehner leading the charge on our side such a ‘deal’ is not totally outside the realm of possibility. Meanwhile, the rest of us must all come to the realization that there are actually more important things to worry about than going over the cliff.

Thursday, July 12, 2012

'SLOW JOE' BIDEN STEPS IN FOR OBAMA AT NAACP...


Playing to what was described as being a very nearly empty house, a fact that was apparently blamed on some inclement weather in the area, our stellar vice president, 'Slow Joe' Biden, in typical fashion, chose to use race as more of a way to divide, than to bring together, as he pushed NAACP convention attendees to contrast Barry "Almighty’s" Department of Justice with a potential Mitt Romney DOJ. "Imagine what the Romney Justice Department will look like," Biden told those few in the NAACP audience who had bothered to show up on Thursday to hear him speak. He went on, "Imagine when his senior advisor on constitutional issues is Robert Bork. Imagine those incredibly important positions of justice. Imagine, and I mean this, this to me is one of the most critical issues in this election, imagine what the Supreme Court will look like after four years of a Romney presidency." Is this guy a piece of work, or what? And yet, blacks continue to eat this stuff up. And I'm sure that comment of old 'Slow Joe's' most likely went over pretty well with the racist NAACP members gathered in attendance since it was on Tuesday that the NAACP 'unanimously' passed what was referred to as being an "emergency resolution" calling the bipartisan votes to hold Attorney General Eric Holder in criminal and civil contempt of Congress a "travesty of justice." The resolution, I suppose, was intended to be a method by which the NAACP could "express their outrage at the treatment of the first African-American and one of the best attorney generals in history." As the resolution passed, Holder, who is most likely the worst Attorney General since Janet Reno, arrived to a rock-star greeting, walking around shaking the hands of many of those in attendance. During his speech at the NAACP on Wednesday, Romney avoided the topic of justice issues choosing, instead, to focus on the issues of the economy and education. Over the course of the campaign Romney hasn’t said much on what his DOJ would look like if he wins the November election, but he has criticized Barry’s DOJ, and especially Holder. "There’s not very much that Eric Holder does that I agree with," Romney said at a campaign event late in 2011 in New Hampshire. "I have to wonder how it is that the president continues to support him, and the answer must be the president agrees with him," he added. Romney has called for Holder's resignation over Operation Fast and Furious, too. And he joins 130 House members, eight U.S. senators and two sitting governors in demanding Holder’s resignation over the scandal. Maybe the NAACP folks might be a little less forgiving if it was a black border agent that had gotten killed courtesy of Fast and Furious. But then maybe not. After all 200 black men have thus far been murdered in Chicago just this year, and yet where's the outrage there? Not important enough of an issue for the DOJ? "Either Mr. Holder himself should resign or the president should ask for his resignation or remove him," Romney said in early December 2011. "It’s not acceptable for him to continue in that position given the fact that he has misled Congress and entirely botched the investigation of the Fast and Furious program." Romney also supports voter ID laws, something Holder and Barry’s administration vehemently oppose. Holder even went to far as to promise those at the NAACP gathering that he would prevent the Texas version of the law from going forward. The former Massachusetts governor has also made Barry’s decision to assert executive privilege over Fast and Furious documents a bit of a campaign issue lately. On Sean Hannity’s radio program and on Neil Cavuto’s Fox News Channel show this week, Romney responded to Barry’s "transparency" attacks on him by pointing out how Barry is doing everything he can to keep concealed Fast and Furious documents. I still say that it's a very sad commentary on a group that was initially brought together for very honorable reasons, and based on such high ideals and sound principles to have, today, deteriorated into its present state and to the point where it is merely a shadow of it's former self. At some point there must have been a conscious decision made to abandon all those for whom it could provide some service or benefit, to instead, become, what essentially amounts to nothing more than an extension of the Democrat Party. If the members in attendance here were actually behaving true to the founding principles or their organization, Biden should have been the one on the receiving end of any boos, not Romney. Romney should have been the recipient of any number of standing ovations. If there is anything that was made abundantly clear, it's the fact that the priorities of this group have become skewed to where the possessing of at least some level of political power now far outweighs the needs of the black individual.

Saturday, June 9, 2012

OBAMA BLAMES..."HEADWINDS"...

ANOTHER DEMOCRAT SLAMS OBAMA CAMPAIGN...QUESTIONS TACTICS...

OBAMA SAYS HUGE PUBLIC SECTOR IS KEY TO HEALTHY ECONOMY…


I think it very fair to say that I think a good many of us are well aware of the fact that Barry, our ‘Dear Beloved Leader’, has never been a big fan of our current economic system or of the private sector workers required to keep it moving. And by now I’m sure we all Barry say, yesterday that the private sector "is doing just fine." And after being forced into clarifying that nutty statement, how he would come back later saying "it is absolutely clear that the economy is not doing fine." He nonetheless repeated again the rebound in private-sector job growth and corporate profits to contend that the private sector has "not been the biggest drag on the economy." He continued to stand by his claim that is factually incorrect, in others words a lie, in which he stated, "The truth of the matter is that … we've created 4.3 million jobs over the last 27 months, over 800,000 just this year alone." So he essentially stand by his claim saying, "Where we're seeing weaknesses in our economy have to do with state and local government." So, at least according to Barry, the solution to getting our economy moving again lies not in creating more private sector jobs, but instead creating many more government jobs. In other words to further expand the size of government. DUH?

Now in making his original cockamamie claim that "the private sector is doing fine," Barry seemed to, once again, blame all but himself. He said, "Where we’re seeing weaknesses in our economy, have to do with state and local government -- oftentimes, cuts initiated by governors or mayors who are not getting the kind of help that they have in the past from the federal government and who don’t have the same kind of flexibility as the federal government in dealing with fewer revenues coming in." But state and local leaders were not the only ones to be blamed for our bad economy, nope, not by a long shot. At least according to Barry, it’s also all of the Republicans in Congress. "If Republicans want to be helpful, if they really want to move forward, and put people back to work, what they should be thinking about is, ‘How do we help state and local governments and how do we help the construction industry?’" Barry said. "Because the recipes that they’re promoting are basically the kinds of policies that would add weakness to the economy, would result in further layoffs, would not provide relief in the housing market, and would result – I think most economists would estimate – in lower growth." Now I may not be a graduate of the Harvard Law School, but this just doesn’t make much sense to me.

Barry’s remarks about there not being enough state employees, strangely enough, came during the same week that Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker, a Republican I might add, survived a union-backed recall election because he curbed some of the state employee benefits and collective bargaining rules. Walker, as we also know, went on to win the recall by a 9 percent margin, 54 to 45 percent. "I was extremely disappointed to hear the president assert this morning that ‘the private sector is doing fine,’" Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wisc.) said in a press release today. "Just as disappointing was his statement, ‘where we’re seeing weaknesses in our economy had to do with state and local government’ and what our nation needs is an expansion of government to cure our economic ills." Sen. Johnson added, "We have had 40 consecutive months of unemployment above 8 percent." He added, "The economy is teetering on the edge of recession. And just last Friday, the Obama administration announced that unemployment is on the rise. This president may be seriously out of touch with reality, and that is frightening." Unemployment rose from 8.1 percent in April to 8.2 percent in May, according to the U.S. Labor Department. Real GDP growth for the first quarter of 2012 was 1.9 percent.

"The economy is not fine. Private sector job creation is not fine," Johnson continued. And in hitting the nail squarely on the head, Sen. Johnson added, "Millions of Americans are suffering from the president’s constant focus on growing government, instead of reasonable, bipartisan steps to promote private-sector job creation. It is high time we had a president who was focused on economic growth. It is time for a change in course. It’s time for real leadership." And I could not agree more with the senator’s assessment of the situation, it is in fact dire. There has been no leadership demonstrated by Barry in the area of creating real, meaningful, private sector jobs since he first came strutting into the Oval Office. NONE. Name one job creating initiative that was put forward during the first two years of his administration when he had huge majorities in both houses of Congress. There wasn’t one, because the focus was, instead, on the takeover of our healthcare industry. Hundreds of billions of dollars were wasted under the guise of some bogus ‘stimulus’ bill that we were told would keep unemployment at or below 8 percent. Never happened! Because in reality it was nothing more than a slush fund to be used by Barry’s Democrat cronies. Let’s face it, we’ve been lied to by this guy since day one, he’s gotta go!

Sunday, June 3, 2012

ANOTHER PARANOID BLACK GOES AFTER ROMNEY...



Caucasia-Stan? Really? Sounds like this supposedly intelligent black woman, besides demonstrating just how much of a moron she is, might also be a bit of a racist. Ya know, with people like her it's always gotta be about what's best for those po' black folk. It can never be about what's actually best for the country. And trust me when I say, Barack Hussein Obama, hm hm hm, is not in any way what's best for this country. In spite of what Ms. Hunter may think!