ENOUGH OF ALL THIS FOOLISHNESS…

When it comes to what has been, for decades, an attempt by the Democrat Party to rewrite not only the history of their party, but also the history of our country, enough is enough.  Granted, the fact that our nation’s history is, for the most part, no longer being taught in our public schools does make it much easier for the Democrats’ to create their own version of our nation’s history.  And because it’s a very rare event that their version of history is ever challenged, it becomes accepted by many as true.   

This most recent example of revisionist history involves he who was, without a doubt, the single most incompetent, corrupt, and dishonest individual ever to be elected president.  And he was a man who made sure to surround himself with those who equally corrupt.  And that he appointed folks like Hiterly, John Kerry-Heinz, ‘Racist’ Holder, and so many others attest to the vast criminal network encouraged and fueled by the historically vile criminal that we not only elected once, but twice.

And it was apparently in thinking that those folks in a good part of the country were little more than Zombies during those very dark years that comprised the ‘Obama Presidency,’ it was during an appearance at ‘fake news’ HQ, aka the Communist News Network, on Friday’s broadcast of CNN’s “Newsroom,” that ex-secretary of state John Kerry-Heinz confidently declared that ex-president Barry ‘O’s administration “never had a whiff of scandal.”  Talk about living in some alternate universe.

It was from the campaign trail with 2020 Democrat hopeful, ex vice president ‘Crooked Joe,’ that Kerry-Heinz said, “I find that Joe Biden’s breadth of experience and leadership with any number of issues from the Violence Against Women Act to the Assault Weapons Ban to arms control agreements, to pushing an administration to make peace it didn’t want to initially be involved, I think those things will really ring strongly against the other candidacies in this race. That’s why I’m here.”

Kerry-Heinz then went on to add, “I believe Joe Biden is the only person who has the set of relationships around the world, who has had this unbelievable breadth of experience as Chairman of the Foreign Relations Committee and then as vice president for eight years, and an administration, by the way, which never had a whiff of scandal.”  Seriously, “never a whiff of scandal?”  So I ask again, does Kerry-Heinz think that the American people were simply not paying attention from 2009 to 2016?

“Not a whiff of scandal?”  The fact that Barry ‘O’ was elected remains a scandal!  The fact that he ‘legally’ had all of his records sealed, remains a scandal. The fact the media fawned over his every word and Executive Action remains a scandal. The fact that the colleges he went to, where no one remembers him as a student, remains a scandal.  Kerry-Heinz must think that by merely making his outlandish claim the American people will all simply nod in agreement.  And some very likely will.

John Kerry-Heinz, the self-aggrandizing, lying, opportunistic, treasonous, traitorous, vainglorious, political, lickspittle imbecile and insipid chief Obama buttlick and buffoon. The elitist, seditious liar, appeaser and capitulator who is scared that he no longer has a chance for the top job of president. The gutless womanizer who’s one attempt to become president ended in classic failure.  The Barry ‘O’ lapdog who will likely go down in history as being the worst secretary of state this country ever had!

John-Kerry-Heinz, the male version of Hanoi Jane, the rank anti-Semite who sees America being at fault for all that’s wrong with the world.  The delusional clown who’s always for something before then being against it. John-Kerry-Heinz, the same guy who spent a very short, but very personally rewarding time, in Vietnam.  And John Kerry-Heinz, somehow now the guy that we’re all now supposed to believe when he claims that the Obama administration was totally without scandal.

Kerry-Heinz seems to be under the impression that just because Barry’s corrupt DOJ chose not to investigate, or to prosecute, and the ‘fake news’ chose not to report on what was a rather impressive list, even for a Democrat, of scandals does not mean that those scandals never occurred.  This can only work two ways. Either Kerry-Heinz believes the American people are really stupid enough to actually believe his idiotic claim or Kerry-Heinz is so stupid that he actually believes what he's saying.

The claim made by John Kerry-Heinz that the Obama administration was completely devoid of scandal does not alter the fact that the Obama administration was immersed in all manner of scandal and sub-scandal from day one of its existence.  And it’s a list of Barry ‘O’s scandals, as well as some of his supposed ‘accomplishments,’ that many may have forgotten about, including apparently John Kerry-Heinz, that are included, but not be limited to, those appearing on the following list:

1. Fast and Furious

2. IRS attack on conservatives

3. ‘Unmasking’ of Trump officials' names

4. The Benghazi Embassy tragedy

5. The Bowe Bergdahl saga (Trading a traitor for 5 top Terrorists)

6. Spying on journalists

7. Wiretapping the Trump campaign

8. Uranium One mine deal

9. Pallets of cash to Iran $150 Billion

10. Politicization of the State Dept.

11. Supported Muslim brotherhood in Egypt that was eventually thrown out by its people.

12. Israel Election interference

13. Arab Spring

14. Unemployment (minorities & those who quit searching)

15. Welfare increase (up 80% from 2008)

16. Worldwide apology tour

17. Medvedev open microphone about “having more flexibility after the election”

And then there were the many ‘firsts’ for Barry ‘O’, where he was the:

First President to apply for college aid as a foreign student, then deny he was a foreigner.

First President to have a social security number from a state he has never lived in.

First President to preside over a cut to the credit-rating of the United States.

First President to violate the War Powers Act.

First President to be held in contempt of court for illegally obstructing oil drilling in the Gulf of Mexico.

First President to require all Americans to purchase a product from a third party.

First President to spend a trillion dollars on “shovel-ready” jobs when there was no such thing as “shovel-ready” jobs.

First President to abrogate bankruptcy law to turn over control of companies to his union supporters.

First President to by-pass Congress and implement the Dream Act through executive fiat.

First President to order a secret amnesty program that stopped the deportation of illegal immigrants across the U.S., including those with criminal convictions.

First President to demand a company hand-over $20 billion to one of his political appointees.

First President to tell a CEO of a major corporation (Chrysler) to resign.

First President to terminate America’s ability to put a man in space.

First President to cancel the National Day of Prayer and to say that America is no longer a Christian nation.

First President to have a law signed by an auto-pen without being present.

First President to arbitrarily declare an existing law unconstitutional and refuse to enforce it.

First President to threaten insurance companies if they publicly spoke out on the reasons for their rate increases.

First President to tell a major manufacturing company in which state it is allowed to locate a factory.

First President to file lawsuits against the states he swore an oath to protect (AZ, WI, OH, IN).

First President to withdraw an existing coal permit that had been properly issued years ago.

First President to actively try to bankrupt an American industry (coal).

First President to fire an inspector general of AmeriCorps for catching one of his friends in a corruption case.

First President to appoint 45 czars to replace elected officials in his office.

First President to surround himself with radical left wing anarchists.

First President to golf more than 150 separate times in his five years in office.

First President to hide his birth, medical, educational and travel records.

First President to win a Nobel Peace Prize for doing NOTHING to earn it.

First President to go on multiple “global apology tours” and concurrent “insult our friends” tours.

First President to go on over 17 lavish vacations, in addition to date nights and Wednesday evening White House parties for his friends paid for by the taxpayers.

First President to have 22 personal servants (taxpayer funded) for his wife.

First President to keep a dog trainer on retainer for $102,000 a year at taxpayer expense.

First President to fly in a personal trainer from Chicago at least once a week at taxpayer expense.

First President to repeat the Holy Quran and tell us the early morning call of the Azan (Islamic call to worship) is the most beautiful sound on earth.

First President to side with a foreign nation over one of the American 50 states (Mexico vs Arizona).

First President to tell the military men and women that they should pay for their own private insurance because they “volunteered to go to war and knew the consequences.”  Then he was the First President to tell the members of the military that THEY were UNPATRIOTIC for balking at the last suggestion.

So, not a “whiff of scandal?”  Seriously?  You simply can’t make this shit up.  But it’s John Kerry-Heinz who has absolutely no trouble whatsoever in making shit up.  And that he was once again able to look the American people dead in the eye and make a claim that is so outrageously false, and with a straight face, really tells you all you need to know about this man.  And who in their right mind would ever be willing to vote for a candidate endorsed by this lying sack of human excrement?  Not me!

“DEMOCRATS CAUGHT ON TAPE”…

How is it that Democrats have yet to discover the magic of videotape, I mean it is something that has been around for quite some time now.  I’m not sure what else could possible explain their apparent willingness to spout all manner of political nonsense knowing full well that the chances are very high that it could come back to haunt them courtesy of the nearest guy, or girl, with a video camera.  Or, are they so confident that those in the ‘fake news’ media will never choose to expose them or if someone outside the media were ever to stumble across an embarrassing video, they could always claim that it had somehow been doctored because they never actually said what is so plainly visible on the video.  You know, much like how ‘Crooked Joe’ has denied that he ever attempted blackmail the then president of Ukraine.

Anyway, why I’m even talking about the Democrats and their rather curious ignorance regarding the magic of videotape, is because apparently a video clip has now resurfaced, one that oddly enough features Nancy Pelosi, and one that makes pretty clear how she once believed a president really didn’t need congressional approval in order to use military force.  Pelosi’s made her remarks back in 2011 after she was questioned on ex-president Barry ‘O’ and his lack of congressional approval before he decided to use force in Libya.  It was then that an enterprising young reporter asked Pelosi, “Madame leader, you’re saying that the president did not need authorization, initially, and still does not need any authorization from Congress to go in Libya.”  “Yes,” Pelosi responded before walking away.  Actually she kind of ran away.

Now if we fast-forward eight years, it has been since the missile induced death of terror mastermind Qasem Soleimani, and leader of the terrorist Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) Quds Force, by U.S. forces last week, Pelosi has not only blamed President Trump for the confrontation but stated she will hold a vote on a resolution to limit the president’s power to lead the military in a confrontation with Iran.   Pelosi also claimed that President Trump had used “provocative and disproportionate” force in the successful airstrike against Soleimani.  It was in a statement earlier this week that Pelosi said, “Members of Congress have serious, urgent concerns about the administration’s decision to engage in hostilities against Iran and about its lack of strategy moving forward.”  But where were those same concerns back in 2011?

Now as I mentioned earlier, it would seem that in some regards the Democrats have yet to even make it into the 20th century, in that they apparently fail to realize that the magic of videotape can, at least in the right hands, last forever, or at least for a very long time. And it’s once again that those in the ‘fake news’ media prove just how utterly useless they have now become when they can simply choose to ignore evidence of blatant hypocrisy on the part of Democrats that has once again been revealed in yet another of those rather impressive blasts from the past in the form of these unearthed “Democrats caught on tape” gems.  And yet it continues to be a very rare event when it’s anyone in the ‘fake news’ media puts any of these videos front and center for fear of revealing just how dishonest the Democrats truly are.

I continue to put forward the premise that the Democrat Party, together with those in the ‘fake news’ media, represent what has now become the most significant threat yet to be faced by this country.  When voters are being constantly bombarded with all manner of ‘fake news,’ all of which is heavily, and obviously, slanted to the left, and substantiated by what is, in most cases, some very dubious sources to say the least, I would argue that the populace, many of whom my not even realize they’re being lied to, really doesn’t stand a chance. These days I watch, or listen to, very little ‘fake news,’ choosing instead to I get the majority of my information from various sources that I have deemed reliable, on the internet.  And it’s sad really that a press the purpose of which was to be the watch dog of government, can no longer be trusted.

Look, I think we can all agree that the Democrat Party, for whatever the reason, continue to takes the side of Iran over America and therefore what Pelosi is really up to here is nothing more than to attempt to weaken our position when it comes to responding to Iran, or any other enemy of America, in what would be the appropriate manner.  Iran was also measured in their ‘retaliation’ because they were more than a little unsure of how it was that President Trump would choose to respond.  Well, that's a win for President Trump so we can't have that. Let's take the deterrence away and maybe we can help Iran win, and cause the president to lose. All the left cares about is their war with Trump and to Hell with America.  The American people must come to understand that the Democrat Party is determined to destroy our country.

What’s really behind this latest attempt to stymie the president is really nothing other than pure politics. The Democrats are obviously beside themselves regarding the fact that President Trump is doing so well fighting terrorism, getting the economy roaring, cutting taxes, growing jobs, signing new trade deals and more.  Their anger, and yes their hate, has NOTHING to do with their moral sense of ‘upholding’ the Constitution. They don't give a damn about that.  They’re just mad as Hell and can’t take it anymore.  To accuse them of simply being unhinged, is being kind, because it goes so far beyond that.  They have become quite literally consumed by their hatred of this president.  Even if you're a Democrat how is it that you can bring yourself to support any of those who so very obviously hate your country?

AND ANOTHER RINO SELF-EXPOSED…

I’ve long been disappointed in Mike Lee, the senior Senator from Utah.  He’s always tried to sell himself as being a true Tea Party type and a stalwart conservative.  And back in the beginning, in 2011 when he first assumed his current office, that may very well have been the case.  Bust as so often happens, it would appear that the longer he’s been in office, the more he appears to be out to serve himself and not those who elected him.  Perhaps he’s been hanging out a bit too much with his fellow senator from Utah, Mitt Romney.  Whatever the reason for his continuing slid leftward, he has made it very clear that his interests lie not in “Making America Great Again!”   

And he recently again made that very clear, when earlier this week he took the opportunity to again make us wonder just whose side it is that he’s really on.  It was on Wednesday, during his remarks carried by CSPAN, when he reacted to the Trump administration’s briefing to lawmakers regarding the airstrike that killed terrorist mastermind Qasem Soleimani.  And in so doing Lee used some rather disparaging language.  Lee complained, “The briefing lasted only 75 minutes whereupon the briefers left.”  Ok, so how long did he think it should have lasted?  I mean, he’s a pretty bright guy, right?  What was it that he thought might have been missing?

Anyway, it was from there that Lee went on to say, “This is not the biggest problem I have with the briefing, which I would add was probably the worst briefing I have seen at least on a military issue in the nine years I have served in the United States Senate. What I found so distressing about that briefing was that one of the messages we received from the briefers was do not debate, do not discuss the issue of the appropriateness of further military intervention against Iran. And that if you do, you’ll be emboldening Iran.”  I guess I’m just not seeing what it is that has his panties in such a bunch.  Is he yet another who seems to have forgotten why he is where he is?

Lee said, “The implication being that we would somehow be making America less safe by having a debate or a discussion about the appropriateness of further military involvement against the government of Iran.”  And he went on to say, “I find it insulting and demeaning. Not personally, but to the office that each of the 100 senators in this building happens to hold. I find it insulting, and I find it demeaning to the Constitution of the United States to which we’ve all sworn an oath. It is, after all, the prerogative of the legislative branch to declare war. Article I, Section 8 makes that very clear.”  Another guy who bogusly claims allegiance to the Constitution?

He said, “Alexander Hamilton, in Federalist No. 69 made clear that this was a sharp contrast from the form of government that we had prior to the revolution. A form of government in which the executive, the king, had the power to take us to war. He did not need the parliament to weigh in on it, to support it.  It is not acceptable for officials within the Executive branch of government, I don’t care whether with the CIA, with the Department of Defense or otherwise, to come in and tell us we can’t debate and discuss the appropriateness of military intervention against Iran. It’s un-American. It’s unconstitutional, and it’s wrong.”  Lee takes himself too seriously!

I’m more than a little curious about where this sniveling, arrogant, weasel was when it was Barry ‘O’ who was using drones to take out supposed bad guys, one of whom, if I remember correctly, was an American?  And I still don‘t get why anybody would ever hold this guy up as being some sort of Conservative icon.  He has been, and for some time, a corporatist shill, always for bringing in more foreign workers and issuing more H1B visas while stabbing American workers in the back.  Utah, how do you elect such losers?  The only positive thing I can think of to say about Lee is that he‘s not Mitt Romney, at least not yet!  But it would seem he’s becoming more like him every day!

Lee is rapidly becoming as hysterical as the Democrats.  You would think that such a ‘smart’ guy would obviously realize that no one was ordering him not to speak.  It sounds to me like Lee was just looking for an excuse to support the Democrats’ attempt at an amendment the purpose of which is to hinder the president, without being excoriated by the media and his voters back in Utah.  The DoD didn't want to discuss how information was obtained in front of the traitorous Democrats attending the briefing, so they didn't answer questions.  There are many Senators who have proven they would rather see Iran win than the president.  Might Lee be one of those?

And before I come down too hard on those who voted for this guy, Lee was once considered, until 2016, to be in the top 3 Republican Senators by almost everyone in the country.  But then, these are the very same voters who thought it would be a good idea to vote for Willard ‘Mitt’ Romney.  And the fact that Lee has only become pretty much of a turncoat since being re-elected, it can't be blamed on Utah. DC and its circles of power and money turn good men into liars, thieves, creeps and traitors.  And there is no state that can boast having a perfect congressional delegation.  I'm from Florida and therefore have my own cross to bear with RINO Marco Rubio.

There was a time when I actually liked Lee, but these days not so much.  Because over time I’ve come to realize that he’s really little more than just another opportunistic stooge looking for a little media attention and apparently sees attacking the president as being his best way to get it.  We all need to be on the same team here and if Lee feels that he is simply not able to do that then maybe the time has come for him to either join the other side where he would likely be much more comfortable, or allow the people of Utah to elect someone who is more willing, and able, to support President Trump who is only trying to keep America safe.  

And so President Trump continues, practically by default, to expose these snakes and vipers that have been hiding in the grass and disguising themselves as conservatives for years. They should not be permitted to survive another election.  President Trump is an extremely loyal American, something that cannot be said of his predecessor.  And yet it’s our current president that continues to rub so many on our side the wrong way.  Of course those would be the very same ones who favor open borders, unfettered immigration, support bogus ‘climate change,’ and any other issue the Left supports and which runs counter to what those who elected these hypocrites, support.

President Trump has made it possible for many Americans to gain entry into the middle class.  And while his number one focus has been the economy and job creation, he has already done more than his predecessor regarding our ongoing crisis at the border, eliminating those who seek to kill Americans and the strengthening of our military.  Let’s not forget that it was Barry ‘O’ who handed out taxpayer subsidized corporate welfare like candy and couldn't create “shovel ready” jobs even with an $800+ billion dollar ‘stimulus package.’  And we know about Barry’s comment about the need for a “magic wand” to bring manufacturing jobs back to America.

So voters are going to have a very important decision to make in this next election.  Who is it that best shares their personal vision of American?  Is it any one of the Democrats now running for president?  Is it any of the RINOs now in Congress who seem to be spewing the same talking points as their Democrat colleagues?  Or is it members of the Democrat Party, in Congress, who have thrown everything but the kitchen sink at this president in what has been their continuing effort to impeach him?  Or, is it the vision that President Trump has for our country that most resembles their own?  I know where I stand, I stand with President Trump and I share HIS vision!

DEMOCRATS: DO AS I SAY, NOT AS I DO…

For as long as I can remember I’ve been lectured by some dolt on the left about how they are somehow better than I.  I’ve been called selfish, uncaring, mean and, of course, ‘racist’ all for no other reason than because I have placed, and continue to place, a priority on my being able to take care of my family and to keep them safe in the best way that I could.  And I’ve also been seen as worthy of being chastised, and because I happen to care more about what kind of life it is that my children will have than I care about the lives of those who seek entry into my country and very often for no other reason than to take advantage of our very generous social services.    

And it is truly a very rare event when any of those doing the lecturing actually practice what it is that they preach.  For instance, the four leading 2020 Democrat presidential contenders have demanded more refugee resettlement in American communities, but oddly enough it’s ‘their’ own hometowns that seem to be considered as being off limits when it comes to such settlement and have taken little-to-no refugees over the last decade.  ‘Crooked Joe,’ Sanders, Warren, and Buttigieg have each vowed to massively increase the flow of refugees from abroad and into the United States if we’re actually stupid enough to elect any one of them president.

And yet, and as is typically the case with these people, it’s their hometowns in each of the states where they have residences, that have largely passed the burden of refugee resettlement onto neighboring states and communities.  For example, Rehoboth Beach, Delaware, where ‘Crooked Joe’ and his wife have a vacation home, resettled zero refugees between 2009 and 2019.  Delaware, in fact, has resettled only 82 refugees since 2009, a figure that makes it one of the least likely states in the nation to resettle refugees.  In Wilmington, Delaware, where ‘Crooked Joe’s’ primary residence sits, less than 50 refugees have been resettled in the last decade.

Likewise when looking at Warren’s home residence of Cambridge, Massachusetts, has managed to resettle less than 50 refugees over the last decade, even as she has called for more than a 700 percent increase in refugee resettlement, a policy that would likely have absolutely no impact whatsoever on where she lives.  And it’s South Bend, where Buttigieg has lived his entire life, that has resettled only about 106 refugees between 2009 and 2019, even though neighboring Indiana towns have had to absorb more than 19,800 refugees in that same period of time.  So am I the only one who happens to see a bit of a trend developing here?  It all seems pretty obvious to me.

Meanwhile, Burlington, Vermont, where one of Sanders’s ‘three’ homes is located, has resettled less than half of the 3,087 refugees that have been admitted to the state since 2009 despite being the state’s largest city. This indicates that close to 2,000 refugees have had to be absorbed in small Vermont towns outside of where Sanders lives over the last decade.  The small town of North Hero, Vermont, where Sanders’s lakefront vacation home resides, has taken zero refugees between 2009 and 2019.  So the home regions of Biden, Sanders, Warren, and Buttigieg resettled just 0.22 percent of the total number of refugees, more than 655,000 that were settled.

There are at the present time nine different refugee contractors who are responsible for the resettlement of all refugees for the State Department every year.  These refugee contractors have a vested interest in ensuring as many refugees as possible are resettled across the U.S. because their annual federally funded budgets are contingent upon the number of refugees they resettle.   Refugee resettlement costs American taxpayers nearly $9 Billion every five years, and that’s according to the latest research.  Also, over the course of five years, an estimated 16 percent of all refugees admitted will need housing assistance, and that too is paid for by taxpayers. 

The Democrats, and the left in general, being hypocrites by nature, of course have no desire whatsoever in sharing any of the burden that they seek to foist upon the rest of us. This is the established ‘limousine liberal’ syndrome adjusted to the current, and ongoing, ‘refugee’ situation.  By the way, and excuse me for asking, are these people really “refugees,” or are they merely economic migrants who have succeeded in getting so-called  ‘refugee’ status in looking to gain for themselves a free ride?  It’s just that I’m getting more than a little tired of being viewed as the cash cow for the planet just because we’ve become rather lax about who comes into our country.

But isn't this how it always is with those on the left, the ones screaming the loudest about wanting to allow into the country more and more immigrants and expecting those of us who don't want them here, to take them in.  And then when we dare to object we’re accused of being racist?  Look, the ulterior motive here for Democrats is, of course, to work toward saturating Red counties with these freebie seeking immigrants, diluting the voting population in the hope of turning red counties blue.  And like it or not, if we don't stop this we won't recognize America in 25 years, or less.  It will be a dysfunctional, lawless, bankrupt country taking orders from China.

Personally, I would be in favor of shutting down ALL immigration, both legal and obviously illegal, until we can sort out who’s here and deport as many as possible of those who don’t belong here. Then those who are here legally will be given an appropriate amount of time to assimilate or be asked to leave.  Until that time there is no need for more immigration.  We are not the worlds welfare system no matter how much the Democrats want to adopt the California model that would result in making the U.S. a welfare magnet for every parasite looking for a free ride and who’s not hesitant in the least when it comes to taking advantage of others.   NO MORE!!!

‘CRAZY MAZIE’ SPEWS THE LATEST DEMOCRAT TALKING POINT…

Well the talking points have now been issued and, like the good little America-hating buffoons that they are, Democrats, as well as their many allies in the ‘fake news’ media, are dutifully sticking to them, no matter what.  And it’s in their continuing defense of mass murderer, Qasem Soleimani, that they now claim the President’s ‘only’ possible rationale for killing this guy is their ‘wag the dog’ scenario that has the president using the death of this mad man as a distraction from their bogus attempt at impeachment.  Which now seems to be crumbling right before their very eyes.  

And apparently it was ‘Crazy Mazie’ Hirono’s turn earlier this week when she appeared there at ‘fake news’ HQ, aka the Communist News Network, on Monday’s broadcast of CNN’s “The Situation Room.”   And it was then that ‘Crazy Mazie’ accused President Trump of having ordered the airstrike that killed Iranian General Soleimani to cause “chaos in the Middle East” to distract from his ongoing impeachment.  Yup, by golly, crafty old ‘Crazy Maxie’ was able to see right through what the president was doing.  Seriously?  This is the best Hawaii could do?  

The not-so-bright ‘Crazy Mazie’ said, “I conclude that there is ongoing chaos within this administration. Clearly that the Iraqi Parliament wants us to leave, and this letter actually seemed to comport with it, and only to be told moments later, it is a mistake. So, you know, we have asked earlier what is the end game? I don’t think that there is an end game that this administration thought about, because this is the way that the president makes his decisions. And here we are with chaos in the Middle East.”   She concludes?  And on what, exactly, does she base her silly conclusion?

She went on to say, “We are sending close to 10,000 more troops into the Middle East. Where they are going to be stationed, we don’t know. We are sending B-52s, and rather than de-escalating the tensions that are already there I think we have done the opposite.”  She added, “I think that the president is so concerned about the impending impeachment trial that this is a heck of a way to distract us, and using basically the lives of our troops and not to mention the civilians in this area.”  That anyone saw the wisdom in electing this moron, is what’s truly frightening.

Well, well, well....what a surprise. While the President wrestles with the life-or-death issues of the day, the moronic thick-as-thieves Democrats whine on and on and on about their fraudulent attempt at impeachment which would now seem to be going absolutely nowhere, and by their own hand.  We now seem to have progressed from there being some dire need to remove this president as quickly as possible to where Democrats now seem to waiting for what they would hope to be a more politically opportune moment to perhaps have more of an impact on the coming election.     

‘Crazy Mazie’ is another of those mentally challenged members of Congress, like ‘Mad Maxine.’  If you’re so inclined you can look her up on Wikipedia you’ll see that she has accomplished little in her life.  It will list her miserable childhood, then all of her education, then her many political positions.  Unlike President Trump, who built up a very successful business, ‘Crazy Mazie’ has spent much of her adult life living off the taxpayers.  And apparently she now thinks that she’s someone in need of being listened to, but, more often than not, she’s worthy of being completely ignored.    

‘Crazy Mazie’ is a joke, a clown, a brainless twit, and has been throughout her entire political ‘career.’  She’s yet another example of a well-entrenched Democrat who has no reason to fear losing an election due to the fact that her constituents are overwhelmingly brain-dead Democrats.  ‘Crazy Mazie,’ ‘Mad Maxine,’ ‘Botox’ Nancy and others can sit back and spew their venomous rhetoric comfortable in the knowledge that they will face no consequences for doing so.  Their statements are counterproductive but that matters not, because it’s all about getting the president.

But let’s face it, what is there that really needs to be distracted from.  No one really cares about their silly impeachment because it’s all a sham. The Democrats are using the Iran issue, to keep those few people they have left focused on their sham impeachment. The Democrats know the impeachment is nothing but a lie. The American people are waking up to the fact that the Democrats are nothing more than a band of traitors, catering to terrorists and illegal immigrants. The Democrats have done NOTHING to help the American people. They are completely out-of-touch.

Democrats and Moslems have long been nothing if not bothers-in-arms.  After all, they are both enemies of America and both represent a very real threat that must be eliminated. Islam is a racist, seditious, discriminatory, deceitful, tyrannical, and terroristic criminal enterprise, against ALL Non-Muslims.  Which makes very clear how it is the ideological sibling of the Democrat Party in that the party is a racist, seditious, discriminatory, deceitful, tyrannical, and politically criminal enterprise that stands in firm opposition to those who love freedom and support our Constitution.  

And I am having a bit of a difficult time trying to figure out the logic regarding their claim that the president is somehow trying to distract from their attempt to impeach him.  Why would President Trump want to distract the voters' attention away from impeachment? His campaign donations have soared during the attempted coup by the Democrats and his approval ratings have really never been better. I would think a distraction in the Middle East is the last thing on his agenda.  He successfully had the military carry out an attack on a terrorist identified by the last administration.

Let’s be very clear here, the Democrats, including ‘Crazy Mazie,’ oppose Soleimani’s death not because they feel the president didn’t follow the proper protocol for taking him out, or even because they’re worried about some massive regional war.  They oppose it because they favor all who, like themselves, hate America.  That is the ugly, unfiltered truth. Democrats hate this country, and have shown a continued willingness to ally themselves with anyone who shares their rather twisted view of a world without a strong, both economically and militarily, free and sovereign America.    

It’s kind of sad really, but the longer I live the more disgusted I become with the caliber of those we continue to elect to Congress.  Is the average American voter really that ignorant?  Research does show that most are uninformed, lazy, or back bench water carriers.  And I find it laughable that Pelosi is described as a brilliant tactician when what she is is an incoherent, bumbling imbecile who sounds like she's drunk.  And Schumer has demonstrated time and again he’s simply clueless. And then look at the collection of morons running for president on the left. God help us.

DEMS MOURN THE DEATH OF A MAD MAN…

It’s becoming increasingly difficult to view the Democrat Party as being anything other than an ally to those wanting to destroy America.  And we should need no further proof of that than the extent to which Democrats continue to claim outrage over the recent death by missile of Qasem Soleimani.  Because to hear Democrats speak of him you would think that this man was nothing short of a saint and whose death was tantamount to cold blooded murder.  However, in truth he was one of the most diabolically evil men to have ever walked the Earth, a fact that seems to matter very little to Democrats in their continuing effort to malign President Trump.  

Case in point would be Democrat Chris Coons who, during Sunday’s broadcast of MSDNC’s “Kasie DC,” commented on the U.S. military’s airstrikes in Baghdad which resulted in the death of Soleimani.  Coons said he is “hoping” the President Trump had “clear justification” for ordering the strikes, but he voiced his lack of confidence that it does because it “has had an uneven relationship with the truth.”  Coons is another of those hypocrites who never once objected to any action, what little of it there was, taken by ex-president Barry ‘O.’  But then Barry was a Democrat and President Trump is not, and that’s really what this continues to be all about.  

Mr. Coons explained to host Kasie Hunt, “I’m hoping that the administration has a clear justification for this step, but I’m not confident they do.”  And he went on to say, “The Trump administration has had an uneven relationship with the truth when it comes to the testimony we have heard over the last few weeks before the House Intelligence Committee and in front of Congress about the remarkable steps taken by the administration to dangle badly needed military aid in front of a vulnerable partner, Ukraine, that has faced aggression from Russia.”  It’s odd that we have a Democrat accusing anyone of having an “uneven relationship with the truth!”

Coons went on to add, “It’s concerning that the Trump administration may have allowed political concerns to influence this decision. That’s something we’ll have to weigh in the classified briefing in the week ahead. Frankly, more than anything, Kasie, the Trump administration owes the American people a clear strategy and a justification for why they would escalate our tensions with Iran.”  Personally, what we’ve gotten from President Trump is a much clearer strategy then anything we’ve ever gotten from ANY Democrat going all the way back to that dipshit, Jimmy Carter.  The strategy seems pretty clear, to kill those seeking to kill us before they can.

Sadly this thug Soleimani was treated as untouchable by the two administrations that preceded President Trump, even as they held him personally responsible for the deaths of hundreds of U.S. service members in Iraq, for fear of the severity of any potential retaliation from Iran.  And I have no reason to doubt that President Trump was presented with the very same information that had been presented to his predecessors, and his decision to ignore it will likely reverberate around the Middle East for decades.  In searching for a rationale for taking Soleimani’s out we really need look no further than the trail of bloodshed left in his wake all across the region.  

The most defining legacy in the Middle East of the man who ran Tehran’s insurgency against U.S. forces in Iraq was not the deaths of hundreds of U.S. service members, nor even the wave of political assassinations that he masterminded throughout the last two decades.  Soleimani made his mark through his unrestrained barbarity towards civilians in both Syria and Iraq, and he was personally responsible for the deaths of literally thousands of innocent people.  These would include the hundreds of Iraqi civilians who were shot dead by Iraqi security forces, acting directly under his orders.  Such is the man that many Democrats, like Coons, now seem to mourn.

Soleimani was brutal, merciless, and ruthlessly efficient at his trade, slaughtering his way across the Middle East.  If he could not bulldoze his way through civilian infrastructure, he had a near endless supply of impoverished, forcibly recruited Shia conscripts from Afghanistan and Pakistan that he could send over the trenches in World War One-like human wave attacks until all resistance was broken, their lives apparently as cheap to him as the lives of the civilian protest movements that he crushed.  And yet we have those like Coons whining about a “clear justification.”  But then we all know that the death of innocents matters very little to Democrats.

Now in trying to make it simple enough so that even a guy like Coons should be able to understand it, I would like to borrow language from a certain ex-secretary of state and two time loser for president, and say that when it comes to the death of this certifiable mad man, “what difference, at this point, does it make?”  But perhaps such a perspective is only to be accepted when it’s made in reference to Americans who have been killed, and when those responsible for those deaths are Democrats.  It may not actually apply when used in reference to the death of man responsible for the death of thousands, a death ordered by a president who is a Republican.  

And I cannot be the only one wondering why it is that the Democrats find it appropriate to go ballistic when a known terrorist gets dusted by Americans, but feel quite comfortable in ignoring it whenever Americans are assassinated by terrorists.  And President Trump has every reason to keep a lid on these types of operations because Democrats simply are not to be trusted not to reveal what it is that they have been told in confidence. And you can’t help but to have noticed how it is that whenever the Democrats are kept in the dark it’s very few, if any, American lives that are lost and the operation in question tends to come off pretty much without a hitch.

So Democrats continue to make glaringly obvious that there is good reason to leave them out of the decision making process regarding the taking out of dangerous known terrorists. Their un-American, blatantly one sided attempt to nullify our votes and expel President Trump are a clear indication that they seek to rule by force and the rest of us be damned!  The Democrats willingly gave away their right to have a voice in the President's ridding the world of violent people, like this guy Soleimani, who have already killed thousands of their own people as well as our military members.  This was not a declaration of war, it was nothing more than a preemptive action.

And now comes word that Nancy Pelosi wrote a letter to her Democrat colleagues in the House on Sunday to reveal a new “War Powers Resolution” that amounts to a pre-emptive surrender to Iran in ongoing hostilities.  Pelosi’s letter begins with the declaration that President Trump’s airstrike last week targeting Qasem Suleimani, leader of the terrorist Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps (IGRC) Quds Force, responsible for the murders of hundreds of Americans and for recent attacks on the U.S. embassy in Baghdad, was “provocative and disproportionate,” terms suggesting the attack was illegal under international law and could constitute a war crime.

The Democrats insist upon making it increasingly difficult for anyone with a brain to take them seriously as a viable political party.  I mean how is that we’re supposed to listen to all that these people say about a president who seeks nothing more than to keep America safe and prosperous and still be able to judge them to be, in any way, responsible enough to be placed in positions of power?  Have they even once stopped to consider how many lives have now been saved because this murderous butcher has been sent off to meet up with his 72 virgins?  Likely not, because for Democrats death is like an aphrodisiac and now a great perpetrator of death is no longer among us.

‘CROOKED JOE’ BIDEN ATTEMPTS TO REWRITE HISTORY…

I think we are all quite familiar, or we should be by now, with the peculiar Democrat penchant for wanting to rewrite history so as to make it appear more Democrat ‘friendly.’  And how it is, more often than not, that Democrats tend to be for something before then being against before again, depending on political points to be gained or lost, being for it again.  I know, it’s confusing but stay with me because I do have a point in bringing this up.  Apparently Democrats are of the opinion that there is absolutely no one who is going to do a little checking up on the claims they make.

But lo and behold, we did.  And stranger still is how we have evidence of how current Democrat contender and ex-vice president, ‘Crooked Joe,’ recently got more than a bit ‘creative,’ to put it nicely.  You see, it was as recently as this past Friday that ex-vice president ‘Crooked Joe’ told a reporter from ‘Fox News’ that he had not actually advised ex-president Barry ‘O’ against ordering the attack that killed Islamic terrorist Osama bin Laden.  Now either ‘Crooked Joe’ is suffering from some age related memory or he’s as we have video and documentary evidence counters his claim.

It all started when at a campaign stop that ‘Crooked Joe’ was asked, “If you were ever handed a piece of intelligence that said you can stop an imminent attack on Americans but you have to use an airstrike to take out a terror leader, would you pull the trigger?”

“Well, we did,” ‘Crooked Joe’ confidently responded. “Guy’s name was Osama bin Laden.”

He was then asked, “Didn’t you tell President Obama not to go after bin Laden?”

‘Crooked Joe’ again responded saying, “No, I didn’t. I didn’t.”

But not long after this exchange it was a strange thing that happened.  It was when Trump communications staffer, Zach Parkinson, tweeting footage of ‘Crooked Joe’ in 2012 explaining his role in the 2011 raid planning saying: “The president, he went around the table with all the senior people, including the chiefs of staff, and he said, ‘I have to make a decision. What is your opinion?’ He started with the national security advisor, the Secretary of State, and he ended with me. … He said, ‘Joe, what do you think?’ And I said … ‘Mr. President, my suggestion is, don’t go.'”

But there was more to come that would make very clear that ‘Crooked Joe’ was not being exactly honest, (big shock there, right) when it came to where he stood regarding the elimination of bin Laden.  You see, it was also courtesy of some documentary evidence from some of ‘Crooked Joe’s’ administration contemporaries including such folks as ex-Secretary of State Hitlery, former Defense Secretary Robert Gates, former White House Press Secretary Jay Carney and others that also made clear that ‘Crooked Joe’ had indeed opposed the raid.  Tell me it isn’t so!!

And it was Parkinson who also tweeted 2012 debate footage showing Barry ‘O’ himself confirming our ex-vice president’s position.  We see Barry telling then Republican nominee Romney: “When it comes to going after Osama bin Laden, you said, well, any president would make that call.  But when you were a candidate in 2008 … you said we shouldn’t move heaven and earth to get one man, and you said we should ask Pakistan for permission. … And even some in my own party, including my current vice president, had the same critique as you did.”

So I believe what we have here may be yet another textbook example of what’s called the double-reverse-Kerry-Heinz maneuver where one was against something before one was for it then at the perfect time one able to honestly say one was both for and against it because instead one preferred to personally go to Pakistan and challenge bin Laden to a push up contest.  It has been noted that ‘Crooked Joe’ has been wrong on every single important foreign policy and national security issue that came about during his entire time in politics.  He is that last person who should be our president.

AL GREEN FESSES UP…

Not that we really needed any such confirmation that what is now being perpetrated against the president began even before he was elected, it was earlier this week that we seemed to get one anyway.  You see, it was one of everyone’s favorites leftwing loons, and member of the House from the great state of Texas since 2004, none other than Al Green, who admitted that the Democrats’ efforts to impeach President Trump began all the way back to when he was campaigning to become president.  Green, who has been at the forefront of Democrats’ attempts to impeach Presider Trump, made this revelation during what was an MSDNC interview just this past Monday. 

It was ‘host’ Chris Hayes, who, by the way, is neither a particularly bright individual nor is he someone who is by any means considered as being a bona fide ‘journalist,’ who began the bizarre little exchange with the esteemed Mr. Green by saying, “You just mentioned political expediency and insincerity — those are two charges that have been leveled against Democrats during this entire affair, particularly since September when the formal impeachment inquiry started, and you play a starring role in those charges.”

Hayes then went on to say, “I mean, the argument goes like this of House Republicans and Trump and his allies: basically the Democrats wanted to impeach Donald Trump from day one, they cast about looking for a set of facts that they could plausibly use to do it, and all of it was pretextual and reverse-engineered to get to this point, and Exhibit One: Congressman Al Green, who [has] been calling for the man’s impeachment for two years now,” Hayes said. “What’s your response to that charge?”

Green responded by saying, “Well, the genesis of impeachment, to be very candid with you, was when the president was running for office.”  And added, “With those things in mind and with the president’s behavior before us, firing Mr. Comey who was investigating the intrusion of Russia into his campaign, our election, that was something that was not to be tolerated. And the president has continued to try to thwart the efforts of Congress to investigate with Mr. Mueller. The president, by and through his White House counsel, tried to get this done again to deal with Mr. Mueller to extricate him, to remove him from the process.”

Green went on to say, “More specifically, I said that the president would claim that he was exonerated if there were impeachable actions that he performed and we did not move to perform our duty to impeach him.”  And he said, “He has distorted the truth. He has twisted it and tried to crush it to earth.”  Green has already suggested that he has no interest in trying to work with the administration to achieve anything for the American people because he is already thinking about impeaching President Trump again in the future if the president wins re-election.  It was as recently as last month that Green told C-SPAN, “A president can be impeached more than once.” 

Green continued, “So, we can do this, we can move forward with what we have on the table currently, we can take this before the Senate and we can still investigate other issues and when the president has committed additional offenses, and my suspicion is that he will, we can take those before the Senate.”  He said, “There is no limit on the number of times the Senate can vote to convict or not a president, no limit to the number of times the House can vote to impeach or not a president.  So, my belief is that the speaker will probably say we’re going to move forward with what we have now, but we’re not going to end investigations and that there may be possible opportunities to do other things at a later time.”

I guess I’m guilty of giving far too much credit to those who continue to vote for Democrats when it comes to assuming they’re more intelligent than they really are.  After all, we all know what happens when you assume.  You see, I keep hoping, whenever I see someone like Green denying wrongdoing by admitting to something even more extreme, that this will be the behavior that causes Democrat voters to pause.  But it never happens, maybe this time.  But it’s not likely.  The vast majority of those on the left who vote for these charlatans are far beyond possessing any sort of logic and no amount of ‘facts’ is likely to alter their perception of the truth.

These days most of those on the left seem quite satisfied to get their information from what are some very questionable sources made up of various forms of propaganda, comedy skits, third rate academics, manipulated studies and statistics, activist teachers and professors or headlines generated by those on in ‘fake news’ who today seem not the least bit hesitant when it comes to looking us dead in the eye and lying. It's an echo chamber and they have developed a hatred for the Trump supporter and religious right archetypes so much that they are not open to discussion of any kind and would prefer anecdotal evidence that supports their many prejudices.

And don’t you have to wonder how much longer Blacks will keep falling for these pathetic race-hustlers like Green?  He’s really no different than Sharpton; he has no real concern for struggling Black families, if he did he would be supporting this President and not screeching about the need to impeach him.  After all, our current president has done far more for blacks than our previous president ever did.  They continually hide behind scurrilous charges of racism rather than improve anything that might actually translate into allowing President Trump some level of credit for doing something good.  Politicians like Green are only in it for themselves .

The saddest part of this continuing charade is that the Democrats seem to care very little, if at all, about what they're opening up with this “we can impeach anytime we want” mantra of theirs.  When they couldn't get the 60 votes needed in the Senate to confirm Barry’s judges, they instituted the ‘nuclear option’ to allow it with only 51 votes and were then shocked when Republicans used it for President Trump's nominees. They cheered and defended Barry when bypassed Congress and were up in arms over President Trump doing it. Now they're establishing the precedent for impeaching a president for no other reason than they don't like him and don’t see that a Republican House could now do the exact same thing to a Democrat president.

And frankly I continue to be amazed at how it is that we now have so many in Congress who come across as being rather ignorant, uneducated and even borderline psychotic. And what’s truly frightening is the fact that these are the people who are in charge of making decisions and drafting policies that will come to affect every American as well as the future of our country.  But are they really an accurate reflection of those whom they are elected to represent, if so then that’s even scarier.  It seems that intelligence and honesty are no longer requirements for elected office which comes with huge salaries and great pensions.  And they continue to elected and then re-elected.

At the end of the day I do think that most rational Americans are able to see Green for exactly what he is, a racist nut case.  According to boobs like Green slavery was something that was somehow the fault of President Trump's fault as was the sinking of the Titanic and the Challenger explosion.  Green is one of the more radical member of the Democrat Party and one who desires more than anything to tear down the Republic. His warped vision is to essentially remove all ‘white’ people from power, confiscate their property and then proceed to redistribute it to those who, in his view, are the perceived victims of he, and those like him, refers to as white supremacy.

WHAT’S ‘CROOKED JOE’ WORKING SO HARD TO KEEP FROM US???

What is it about Democrats and what seems their overwhelming NEED to keep things hidden from the American people?  After all, how much is it that we still don’t know about our last president because he was able to keep so very much about his past under court ordered lock and key?  And when, by chance, any of what Barry has worked so hard to keep secret ever does see the light of day, the American people will likely be shocked to find out the extent to which they were bamboozled.

Which brings me now to what is said to be the thousands of documents pertaining to ‘Crooked Joe’s’ nearly 40-year career in the U.S. Senate that are still unavailable to the public after one of the preliminary release deadlines agreed to by our ex-vice president passed just this past Tuesday.  What is it that gives ‘Crooked Joe’ the right to keep from those whom he was supposedly working for ANY information that may be related to that same employment?  And why is it ALWAYS Democrat who does this? 

These documents, which are said to fill some 1,875 boxes and include 415 gigabytes of electronic records spanning ‘Crooked Joe’s’ time in Congress between 1973 through 2009, were supposed to be made public on Dec. 31, 2019.  That was according to an agreement our ex-vice president entered into with the University of Delaware in 2011 upon donating his papers to that institution.  But was we all know, it’s whenever dealing with Democrat politicians that agreements are most often etched in Jell-O.

Because you see, the original parameters regarding the release of these documents were changed back on April 24, oddly enough the day before ‘Crooked Joe’ declared himself to be running for president, when the university announced the trove of documents would now be made public on Dec. 31 or “two years” after our ex-vice president “retires from public life.” At the time, the university provided no definition for what it considered “public life,” leaving open the final date for release.

Included among these ‘thousands’ of documents are said to be “committee reports, drafts of legislation,” and personal correspondence between ‘Crooked Joe’ and many of his colleagues, both Democrat and Republican.  Some of the records are likely to be controversial, especially those detailing our ex-vice president’s early work alongside southern segregationists to oppose busing to integrate public schools.  But that should have no bearing whatsoever on whether or not they should be released.

This issue reared its head in June 2019, when Biden praised the “civility” of two such allies, the late-Sens. James Eastland, Democrat, and Herman Talmadge, Democrat, while touting his ability to forge bipartisan consensus.  “I was in a caucus with James O. Eastland,” our ex-vice president then told donors at a fundraiser in New York at the time. “He never called me boy, he always called me son.”  Well gee, that would most certainly excuse any all racist tendencies that might have been held, right?

‘Crooked Joe’ continued by saying, “Well guess what?  At least there was some civility. We got things done. We didn’t agree on much of anything. We got things done. We got it finished. But today you look at the other side and you’re the enemy. Not the opposition, the enemy. We don’t talk to each other anymore.”  Civility?  Who is it that represents the greatest roadblock to civility?  I’m thinking that it’s those who are all of ‘Crooked Joe’s particular left-leaning political persuasion.

Not to make light of ‘Crooked Joe’s continuing to keep hidden from the American people what they have every right to know, what it is that ‘Crooked Joe’ actually accomplished during his many years as a U.S. Senator, other than to make both himself and his coke-head son extremely rich.  We all know that ‘Crooked Joe’ is another of those on the left who have sought little more than to destroy America and do we really need these documents to tells us that which we already know about him?

And as you may recall it was back during the 2008 campaign that our ‘fake news’ media showed virtually no interest in looking into Barry ‘O’s past, or to look into what the then Democrat candidate was working so hard at trying to keep from ever seeing the light of day.  Everything regarding his days at Harvard and anything that had to do with his time as both a community agitator as well as a state senator.  All things that the voters should have been made privy to before choosing whom to vote for.

Why is it, exactly, that ‘Crooked Joe,’ or any public servant, has what is in effect property rights over any of these thousands of documents that are related, no matter how remotely, to their time spent in public ‘service?’  And it's not only ‘personal’ records of these public servants, it's all of the hidden programs and budgets of just about every government servant and agency we have that's also being kept from us.  Keep in mind that this was supposed to be a government of, by and for the ‘PEOPLE!’

That, of course, is not what we really have these days.  WE now serve the government instead of the other way around. And none of this will ever change until “We the People” decide to change it.  And with each passing day that it becomes less and less likely to be something that likely to take place peacefully.  And that would seem to be the direction in which many of those on left, including those in the Democrat Party, want us to go.  Destroying America by any means possible is now their goal. 

I do find it rather odd that ‘Crooked Joe’ is the frontrunner for the Democrats. He put his lunacy on full display recently when he said that coalminers could easily turn into computer programmers, “because anybody can learn to code.”  But he makes no mention of the rather sizable cut in pay these miners would be forced to accept if such a thing was even possible.  Which is highly unlikely and he knows it!  It makes clear just how out of touch ‘Crooked Joe’ really is with hardworking Americans.

How any Democrat has a chance in the 2020 election shows the sheer idiocy of a good many voters.  Many of those with whom I work claim his is a racist and a liar yet no one is ever able to point out any specific example of him being racist or a time where he has lied.  But listen to what the Democrats are planning, it’s nothing less than the complete destruction of this country.  One of their methods is to replace our existing population courtesy of those whom they are seek to allow to flood across our border.

Democrats have no problem with mass poverty. Keep the people dependent on big government for their welfare and food stamps.  China has supposedly built hundreds of coal plants and yet those on the left, including ‘Crooked Joe’ thinks it’s a fantastic idea to do away with ALL fossil fuels here, going so far as to threaten executives in the oil and coal business with prison.  This is beyond insanity, and points out yet again how removed from reality those within the Democrat Party truly are.  It’s amazing!

And I find it mindboggling that there aren’t at least some Democrats who are able to accept the fact that President Trump is fighting the government that has refused to work for the American people for what has been decades.  He's the one person who is doing everything he can to get government to work for America’s citizens and not for those in government.  Democrats like ‘Crooked Joe’ are doing all they can to keep him from succeeding because what’s best for the country is not what’s best for them.