If the attempted coup, aka the impeachment of Donald
J. Trump, accomplished anything it was to make crystal clear that which so many
of us, even those of us who do not reside, politically speaking, within the odd
assortment of losers which still refers to itself as the ‘Democrat’ Party, have
known for what has been a very, very long time.
And that, of course, is the fact that the ‘Moderate’ Democrat, as a
political animal, has been forced into going the way of the dinosaur and the Dodo.
If anything is for certain in this election season,
it’s that everything seems uncertain. Should the strong economy continue and
nothing too crazy comes to pass, it’s conceivable that Republicans could hang
onto the White House, the Senate, and possibly even regain control of the
House. President Trump will be on the
ballot in all those districts Democrats managed to strip from Republicans, and
now they’ll also have their own record, or lack thereof (impeachment, anyone?),
upon which to run.
But without a doubt, whoever assumes the presidency
in 2021, our government will remain remarkably divided. If President Trump does manage to win a second
term, he will very likely still be made to face a legislative branch partially controlled
by the Democrats. If that happens to be
the Senate, good luck getting any additional judges or appointees confirmed. If it’s the House, the president won’t be able
to sneeze without Adam Schiff calling for an impeachment inquiry. If it’s both,
God help US!
But it’s important understand that things weren’t
always this way. Richard Nixon won 301
electoral votes in 1968 and a crushing 520 in 1972, but his party controlled
neither the House nor the Senate at any time during his time in office. It was
even after Nixon’s 1972 landslide victory, that Democrats still controlled both
Houses of Congress. Yet Nixon was able to appoint four arguably conservative
Supreme Court justices and a whopping 231 federal judges, 38 more than Franklin
Roosevelt.
Republicans didn’t come close to gaining control of
either legislative branch until Ronald Reagan’s 1980 victory propelled them to
what would become a six-year Senate majority run. Despite Reagan’s popularity and a landslide
1984 reelection, running against Walter ‘One State’ Mondale, whose campaign was
run by that political mastermind and brilliant tactician, Bob Beckel, that made
it possible for Mondale to win only one state, the House remained firmly under
Democrat control.
So if we didn’t know better and just assumed that
things have always been as they are today, one might assume that President Reagan
likely got a few judges and appointees confirmed, which he did, but likely
wasn’t able to get much in the way of meaningful conservative legislation
passed. One could assume that, but one
would be wrong. In fact, Reagan’s
signature Economic Recovery Tax Act of 1981 passed in the Senate (89-11) and
skated through the Democrat controlled House 238-195.
But President Reagan was the only one to be on the
receiving end of a little bipartisanship, it has worked the other way too. For instance, it was ‘Slick Willy’ who reformed
the welfare system with Republican help from a Congress controlled by the
Republicans. And even Barry ‘O’ worked
with Republicans to make the George W. Bush tax cuts permanent. Both also appointed a total of four Supreme
Court justices with bipartisan support and very little opposition or
obstruction from Republicans.
Other than those few exceptions of trade and
criminal justice reform, can anyone imagine President Trump getting Democrat
help on anything considered even remotely conservative these days? Nope! And
can anyone imagine the Democrat led House ending its continuing efforts to
conjure some way to remove President Trump from office and focus on points of
agreement and legislative ideas that are bipartisan and passable? I think we could expect Hell to fully freeze
over before that happens.
And why might that be? Since day one of his presidency Donald Trump
has always expressed a willingness to work with Democrats, so despite his
bluster at times it’s hard to imagine he wouldn’t jump at the chance to do
something good. In fact, Republicans will all-too-often try to work with
Democrats even to the detriment of their own stated principles. The most likely reason is that Democrats in
office have changed as their constituencies have moved further and further to
the hard left.
Consider those once referred to, in a time that
seems long ago, as ‘Blue Dog’ Democrats, these ‘moderate’ Democrats were
essentially “conservative” Democrat House members who favored “fiscal
responsibility, a strong national defense and bipartisan consensus rather than
conflict with Republicans.” Although
you’d never know it there are today currently 27 members who still laughingly
refer to themselves as being ‘Blue Dogs,’ who, if interested, could help
Republicans, help Americans.
If they were, they could very easily follow in the
steps of New Jersey’s Jeff Van Drew, but they haven’t, and they likely won’t. And why is that? The answer is simple. It’s because there is today, no one who
qualifies as being a ‘moderate’, or dare I say ‘conservative,’ Democrat
today. As I mentioned earlier, it is a
breed of politician that was made to long ago go extinct. Perhaps a more accurate way to put it would
be to say those individuals were effectively purged from their own party.
Even on the impeachment of Donald Trump, one
Democrat senator would have meant a bipartisan acquittal, and so it was
therefore something not be allowed by the Democrat ‘leader’ in the Senate Charlie
Schumer, all voted to convict. Even the
‘reasonable-sounding’ Joe Manchin was eventually corralled by Charlie into
betraying his constituents who, albeit naively, allowed this useless dolt to
remain in office. But then, I suppose, we
are talking about West Virginia. No
offense, but geez!
If Manchin’s betrayal in particular has taught us
anything, it’s that in the end, it’s good to know the rules these days. Republicans range from solid to a Willard ‘Mitt’
Romney form of squishy, but there are no, as in Zero, Zip, Zilch Nada,
‘moderate’ Democrats. The age of the bipartisan Democrat is long gone, and
isn’t likely to return any time soon. If
you live in a state where one is running, you’ve at least got a fighting chance
voting by Republican, because voting Democrat is a no-win game.
And so there are no bona fide ‘moderate’ Democrats,
but they did once exist. And as proof of
that I would offer up an incident that occurred back in 1963 when at the
request of a constituent, Rep. Syd Herlong, then a Florida House Democrat, read
into the record the 45 goals of communism, from a book by W. Cleon Skousen, doing
so as a warning. Virtually every
prediction has since came true, one being to take over one major political
party. Today we have Democrats running
for president as Socialists!
In the past, Democrats never seemed quite so
determined in their efforts to place party over country, at least to the degree
that we see them doing today. There were
decent Democrats. While I can’t say that
I ever voted for any of them, over time I’ve come to be even less apt to do so.
There was a time when Democrats would
have applauded low unemployment, fewer in poverty or the fact that fewer
Americans are in need of being on food stamps because it was good for the
country. But not today.
And they wouldn’t have embarked on a bogus impeachment
attempt of a Republican president from the very moment he took office, because
they hate him. Or block every single thing
the president has tried to do out of some twisted unwillingness to allow him to
achieve any level of success. They
weren’t the resistance in days gone by, what they were, though, was the loyal
opposition. It used to be that everyone
had the right to vote for a candidate of their choosing without being called
names.
There was a time when Democrats actually accepted
the results of an election lost as being the result of the will of the people. Not so much these days. Democrats didn’t manufacture impeachment
charges against Nixon. It was Republican
members who convinced him to resign because they would have voted for his
removal. Democrat senators in the past
would have voted to acquit President Trump based on what it was that he was
accused of doing. Because it would have
been the right thing to do.
So what changed? There are no longer commonly shared values or
goals. As crazy as Pelosi is even she
knew impeachment was not a good political move. But she was held hostage by her far left
lunatic fringe who demanded it. The
bottom line here is that compromise is no longer tolerated within the modern
Democrat Party. What they want, open borders, abortion on demand, many don’t.
The big lie today is that there are still ‘moderate’ Democrats. They may run as
such but they govern as radicals.
The American people need to
decide what kind of government they want going forward, one of obstruction,
gridlock, and impeachment or one that works to serve ALL of the people. No one benefits from the kind of hateful
destructive politics we've seen from the Democrat Party and there is no reason
to believe that will change any time soon. We already know with Democrats in control the
focus moves away from the people and in favor of government. We must vote out these left wing clowns.
I’m pretty sure that most folks will agree with me
when I say that Democrats together form a group of people who are, generally speaking,
not at all happy. They tend go through
life being little more than sniveling curmudgeons. So when I’m told about some new poll that
shows Democrats are among the demographic groups with the lowest personal
satisfaction in their life, it’s like, tell me something that I don’t know. Oh and by the way, something else I don’t
really need some poll to be telling me is that Republicans are among those who
are the most satisfied in their life.
But with that said, it was according to a Gallup poll
released on Thursday that Gallup broke its survey sample into 21 different
subgroups, and it was among them that Democrats ranked next to lowest in their
personal satisfaction level. The only subgroup to express lower personal
satisfaction was the demographic of those earning less than $40,000 a
year. Only 56 percent of self-described
Democrats said they are “very satisfied” with their personal life, while 86
percent said they were “satisfied.” So
we have another poll that shows LOSERS vote Democrat, WINNERS vote Republican.
Republicans, by contrast, were the second most
satisfied subgroup of the 21, falling only behind the group with a yearly
salary of more than $100,000. And it was
a full 80 percent of Republicans who said they are “very satisfied” with their
personal life, and 93 percent said they are “satisfied.” And it was in his analysis of the data that
Dr. William Donohue, a sociologist and the president of the Catholic League,
said that the reason for Democrats’ all-around unhappiness has very little to
do with race or even economic factors but has everything to do with religious
faith.
And it was Dr. Donohue who said, “Surveys done on
wellbeing have consistently found that there is a positive correlation between
religiosity (religious beliefs and practices) and happiness; the more religious
a person is the happier he is likely to be.” The Pew Research Center released a
study last year that found that “actively religious people are more likely than
their less-religious peers to describe themselves as ‘very happy.’” However, I disagree with Dr. Donohue in that
while I do believe in God, I’m not particularly religious, yet I’m very
satisfied with my life at 67 years of age.
And whereas white Democrats “are the most secular
segment of the population,” Donohue argued, studies show that blacks are much
more religious than whites and black Democrats “have more in common with
Republicans when it comes to religiosity than they do with white Democrats.” In fact, it was Pew that revealed in May 2018
that black and Hispanic Democrats are more similar to Republicans “on a host of
religious measures” and non-white Democrats are far more likely to believe in
God, regularly attend church services, and identify as Christian than white
Democrats.
When your party is all about hating the people who
don’t agree with you it tends to wear on you. The Democrat Party demands that you to choose
between your family and friends and your party, and accuse them of being
horrible people, even racists, when they have a differing opinion. Whereas most Republicans just want to keep
more of what they earn and not be taxed out of existence, while living in safe,
law abiding communities to raise their children. Republicans believe American
citizens should come first and if you migrate here you do it legally and you assimilate.
Democrats are content to sit on their butts, wanting
everything handed to them with nothing expected in return and Democrat
politicians are quite willing to hand out all manner of free stuff to those who
agree to vote for them! They have no
work ethic and little less self-esteem. Republicans, however, have goals and enjoy
working to reach those goals. They understand opportunity is there for everyone
to succeed and they will work hard to support themselves and provide for their
families! They don't want, nor do they expect, others to take care of them, they
tend to be very PROUD!
Nihilism and self-hatred are not exactly the path to
happiness. Democrats are miserable people, who try to find purpose by imposing
their misery on others. Democrats are
all about playing the victim and stealing from others; while Republicans are
all about working hard, achieving things through merit which results in self-esteem,
and helping others. Democrats scream at
the sky, riot and need safe spaces. They suffer from an affliction of their own
creation. And how is it that one can
ever achieve true happiness when they’re triggered by just about everything?
Democrats don't want to grow up. They are
thin-skinned, humorless, jealous, and annoying. It's no wonder they’re not
happy. They try to keep their
unhappiness in check, and some often do and do it well. But they’re always on the edge of being triggered
by something or someone, and they try to mask their unhappiness with drugs
and/or alcohol. And it is as a group that
they are addicted to, drugs, tobacco, alcohol and any number of other self-destructive
behaviors, and always to excess. We often joke about it, but I do believe that
liberalism, at its core, is a type of mental illness.
I guess that's not surprising because they don't
seem to appreciate what they have, spiritually, physically, emotionally, or
otherwise. I think the ‘fake news’ media and schools are largely responsible
for this negative self-image, and of course, negative overall image of America.
And it feeds the increased drug addictions and suicide rate. It builds white
guilt, combined with various flavors of victimhood, and a mandate to change the
world by forcing others to be equally miserable. Such programming is even built into
commencement speeches these days. It’s
nothing short of crazy.
Almost everything good and positive, flows forth
from a sense of gratitude, which is strongly associated with positive emotions
such as happiness, contentedness, satisfaction, and so on, and also with acts
of kindness and generosity. By the same token, much of everything bad and
negative that happens in one’s life, flows from ingratitude which itself
extends from, or leads to, feelings of victimhood and powerlessness, that
whatever an individual's present circumstances are are not their own fault or
responsibility, and is considered to be beyond their control.
So again, how is it, exactly, that anyone who genuinely
believes, or in any way buys into, the left’s conspiratorial nonsense and comes
to think of themselves as nothing more a powerless victim of some oppressor, can
ever be satisfied, happy, or content? Whenever
you meet any Democrat they are nearly always angry, pissed off, hateful and
generally hating of everything about their lives, even when they’re in power. For instance, back when Barry ‘O’ was
president Democrats acted in exactly the same way, with the exception of not
focusing all their hatred on just one man.
Democrat leaders have spent
decades stirring up envy and discontent in their constituents. Some have legitimately hard circumstances,
but most of us a merely victims of our own poor choices. It’s an inability to
reason that makes one susceptible to the manipulation. It takes a little
maturity and a good amount of personal discipline to realize the potential we
all have for a great life. It's hard to be happy when all you know how to do is
to hate. The party of inclusiveness and diversity hates anyone who doesn't
completely agree with them. It must truly suck to be them.
And so, another true believer in what we all
recognize as being a murderous cult built entirely on hate, violence and death has
now been not so peacefully sent off to rendezvous with the 72 virgins said to
be enthusiastically awaiting on his arrival in Hell. Which begs the question, with all of those
that President Trump has recently escorted off to the great beyond, might there
now be a looming shortage of virgins?
But anyway, the White House confirmed earlier this
week, on Thursday, that U.S. forces had executed yet another precision, and
dare I say flawless, strike resulting in the premature demise of one of the
founders and the current leader of al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP),
Qasim al-Rimi. So Mr. al-Rimi is no
more, leaving behind, I can only hope, a rather sizable crater which would be
only fitting.
In a statement released late Thursday afternoon, the
White House announced, “At the direction
of President Donald J. Trump, the United States conducted a counterterrorism
operation in Yemen that successfully eliminated Qasim al-Rimi, a founder and
the leader of al-Qa’ida in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP) and a deputy to
Al-Qaeda leader Ayman al-Zawahiri.” So I
guess we got two for the price of one?
This is the third major terrorist taken out at the
direction of President Trump in recent months thus the reason for my aforementioned
question regarding a possible dwindling reservoir of available virgins. And it’s the list of those recently expired
that includes Qasem Soleimani, leader of the Quds force in Iraq and general of
the IRGC, and Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, the leader of the Islamic State in Iraq and
Syria.
The statement went on to say, “Rimi joined al-Qa’ida
in the 1990s, working in Afghanistan for Osama bin Laden. Under Rimi, AQAP committed unconscionable
violence against civilians in Yemen and sought to conduct and inspire numerous
attacks against the United States and our forces.” And yet, I’m quite sure that the Democrats
were more than a little saddened upon hearing the news of his death.
This was the latest operation that reaffirms
President Trump and his administration’s commitment to the eradication of
terrorism and protecting the United States’ and its interests around the world. And it was President Trump who said in his
State of the Union address earlier this week, “Our message to the terrorists is
clear, if you attack our citizens, you forfeit your life.” And still these monsters seem not to believe
him.
Confirmation of Rimi’s death came just days after al-Qaeda
in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP) released a video clip claiming responsibility
for December’s deadly shooting by a Saudi military officer training at Naval
Air Station Pensacola. Mr. al-Rimi featured
rather prominently in that video. His life could have been very different, but
he chose the path of hate and violence and now he’s dead, going out with a bang.
AQAP was responsible for several terrorist plots,
including an attempt to bomb a Detroit-bound aircraft on Christmas Day 2009. It
failed when the Nigerian terrorist was restrained after trying to detonate explosives
hidden in his underwear. The following
year, an AQAP plot to ship bombs to the U.S., hidden in packages on commercial
cargo planes, was foiled. Yes, members
of a ‘religion’ of peace.
An AQAP-associated threat was cited as the reason
for the temporary closure of more than 20 U.S. embassies in 2013, and in 2015,
AQAP claimed responsibility for the killing of 12 people at the Paris offices
of the satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo. The two shooters were French-Algerian
Muslim brothers, who had visited Yemen in 2011. Barry would likely have viewed
them as another ‘JV’ squad, but not President Trump.
Rimi was named AQAP leader in 2015, after his
predecessor Nasir al-Wuhayshi was killed in a U.S. drone strike in eastern
Yemen. Wuhayshi had been leader since
AQAP’s formal launch was announced in 2009, and like Rimi after him, was also named
a deputy to al-Zawahiri. So as he moved
up the ladder in the terrorist world, he ended up making himself a far more
sought after target until one day, BOOM!
The State Department designated AQAP as a foreign
terrorist organization in 2010, and months later designated Rimi, then its
“senior military commander,” as a global terrorist. Thus he was made worthy of extermination and
at our earliest possible convenience.
And now that time has finally come. And so now we have one less of these murdering
ragheads hanging around, saving the lives of God knows how many.
President Trump has continued to make it very clear
that he has no intention of fooling around with those who proudly profess themselves
to be enemies of America, and who wish to do our country, and our people, grave
harm. And the president has continued to
demonstrate that these terrorists can run, but they most certainly cannot
hide. They’re living on borrowed time
and don’t even know it.
And I think it worth mentioning that were we unfortunate
enough to now have Hitlery as our president instead of Donald Trump, ISIS would
most certainly still be thriving, and scumbags like this al-Rimi guy, as well
as Soleimani and al-Baghdadi would still be alive and well, and be free to go
about the murdering of all manner of innocents.
Because, as we’ve seen, Democrats have virtually no interest in killing
terrorists.
And you can’t tell me that there does not exist,
today, some sort of twisted alliance between members of our Democrat Party and
members of any of these radical Islamic terrorist groups. After all, regardless of what motivates them,
be it politics or religion, radicals are radicals. Both seek to bring about as much anarchy,
chaos and violence as possible because they can use it to them makes themselves
stronger.
And it’s the radical Democrats and their radical
Moslems allies who, I would argue, possess much the same goal, that being of
course, to bring an end to America as we know it. And it’s at the present time that the ONLY
person truly standing in the way of both of these radical groups is President
Donald J. Trump. But he’s only going to
be around until January 2025 and right now we have no one to replace him.
And with no one willing to stand up to the left in
the manner which we have grown accustomed to seeing President Trump do, how
much difficulty with the Democrats have in simply waltzing right back into the
White House, potentially with a majority in both Houses of Congress. And once they are firmly in control is there
any doubt that they won’t then welcome in their Moslem allies to share in the
fruits of their labor?
And it’s that scenario that
is truly the most frightening. If that
were to happen, my friends, then the end would be virtually guaranteed. If we are to have any hope of preventing what
looks to be right now as being inevitable, we must do all that we can to not
only ensure President Trump wins reelection, but that we have a bona fide
successor at the ready for when he departs.
And it’s never too soon to start looking.
Look, we all know that there is, today, an
overabundance of dim bulbs in Washington, but there are few who are dimmer than
dim bulb ‘Little Timmy’ Kaine. And it’s
every time that this guy opens his big mouth that he continues to prove that
that still remains to be very much the case.
He’s like every other Democrat, in that he really never knows when to
shut up. And is usually the case with
these people, it’s like they are driven to reveal their contempt for this
president whenever they have any opportunity to do so. And think about, this guy could have been our
vice president. But for the grace of God
he isn’t and neither is Hitlery our president.
And it was Wednesday night, during a broadcast of
MSDNC’s “Andrea Mitchell Reports,” while discussing Nancy Pelosi’s ‘decision’
to tear up her copy of the president’s SOTU speech, that ‘Little Timmy’ seemed
to justify her behavior, going so far as to describe it as being an appropriate
response to what ‘Timmy’ also described as President Trump’s acting like a
“jackass.” And why is it that no matter
how reprehensible any Democrat may act, somehow it’s never really their
fault. The fault of their behavior
ALWAYS rests with someone other than themselves. In this case, Pelosi’s bad behavior is not
her fault, but is instead the fault of the president.
It was Ms. Mitchell who asked, “The president has
been slamming Nancy Pelosi — he and his allies — for tearing up the speech at
the end of the State of the Union. He did not shake her hand when she proffered
it at the beginning. She left out it is my high privilege and distinct honor
the traditional words. There were snubs
back and forth. Did it warrant her tearing it up to see all of those factual
misstatements claiming that the Republicans are protecting pre-existing
conditions when they’re in court fighting to overturn Obamacare and all those
other claims about the economy and trolling her with the Rush Limbaugh Medal of
Freedom?”
Timmy replied by saying, “Andrea, you’ve kind of
given my thoughts about this.” And he
then went on to say, “I didn’t see the end of the speech when she did that. And
so I got asked about it later and I was just surprised because I hadn’t seen
it. But I said wait, he won’t shake her hand and he gives a Medal of Freedom to
somebody who’s called her every name in the book for years and he stands up
there and lies about health care but we’re going to talk about how she should
respond? He can behave like a jackass but we have to jump all over her back? I mean,
I don’t get the double standard.” Of
course he doesn’t, because he too is a hack politician!
So he doesn’t “get the double standard?” Am I hearing that right, from a Democrat?
Welcome to my world, Timmy! And just
what does ‘Timmy’, or any other Democrat for that matter, really know about being
on the receiving end of a double-standard?
Seriously folks, it’s a pretty rare event when we have anyone on the
left ever held to the same standard that those on the right are held to. It simply doesn’t happen. Democrats are ALWAYS permitted the luxury of
operating under the premise of ‘do as I say, not as I do.’ Republicans are never afforded the same
opportunities. And hear ‘Little Timmy’
whining about some double-standard makes absolutely no sense.
And look, say you’re President Trump, and you know
this crazy bitch, Pelosi, hates your guts. What sense would it make for you to
provide this obvious wackjob an opportunity to embarrass you on national television? And I
have absolutely no doubt that that was exactly what old ‘Crazy Nancy’ had
intended to do. But when that failed, because
the president chose not give her the opportunity, she was then forced to resort
to what was very clearly her Plan B, the tearing up of the speech. So yes there was someone who, during the
evening, did in fact act like a ‘jackass,’ but it most certainly was not the
president, it was the Speaker of the House.
Let’s face it, we all know there is no love lost
between Pelosi and the President. After
all, President Trump has spent the last three years working on those things
that got him elected and Pelosi & Co. have been working just as hard to do
everything they can, including impeachment, to prevent him from doing so. How truly sick is that? And the real victims in all this mess has
been the American people, who the Democrats claim care about. It is they, the American people, who have to
suffer the loss of meaningful reforms to get them back to work and to be able
to provide for their families. And yet
Democrats, like Timmy and Pelosi, have other priorities.
So Timmy calls the President Trump a “jackass?” So I’m wondering is that like being called a
deplorable or perhaps even a dreg of society? Or is it Timmy’s own little way of describing someone
who is responsible for bringing about our current booming economy? Or, is it what he calls someone responsible
for our massive increase in manufacturing jobs, or who made it possible for millions
of people to get off food stamps, or who created an environment that encourages
less dependency on welfare, and who is responsible for record employment and
record low unemployment? Hell, if that’s
what he means by “jackass” then I’d take that as a compliment!
I think Timmy is just
pissed because the bloodless coup attempted by the Democrat Party, against
President Trump, did not quite go off according to plan. Personally, I’m one of those who happen to be
of the opinion that it backfired, and rather spectacularly so. Bummer! President Trump's poll numbers are now the
highest they have been, despite the impeachment nonsense and higher even than
Timmy’s beloved Barry ‘O’ at the same point in his presidency. The Democrat Party
is getting its collective ass kicked by President Trump, and has been for the
entire three years that they have been working so hard in their attempt to get
rid of him.
It was throughout nearly the entire 77 minutes of
last night’s State of the Union address, as she continued to shuffle and then reshuffle
the pages of the speech she had been handed by the president, that you could
almost hear the gears grinding in Pelosi’s pea size brain as she was clearly
trying to conjure up that which she could do in an effort to make some sort of political
statement and in do so doing make herself appear relevant to the Democrat
base? And at some point it must have
come to her.
And so as President Trump wrapped up his State of
the Union address last night, Pelosi ripped up her copy of the speech drawing
considerable criticism from Republicans and a few Democrats. The tension was palpable from the beginning,
as the president appeared to decline to shake Pelosi’s hand after handing her a
copy of the speech. Fox News reported that
the two had not spoken since the president called her a “third grade
politician” during an October meeting at the White House.
Pelosi looked as if she was having a slow burn
during the entire speech. And I had to
chuckle at the antics of the Democrats multiple times throughout the speech. The craziest moment was when the ladies in
white all sat on their hands when President Trump called for outlawing late
term abortions as the mother of a premature baby was shown on camera literally
looking upward in gratitude toward God for having a president who was pushing
to protect the unborn. I thought it was
a great speech!
However, with all that said, it was during the
address that the current divide between Republicans and Democrats in the
chamber was rather starkly illustrated multiple times. Frequently, the Republicans stood and
applauded while Democrats sat stoically, and in silence, not only when President
Trump made partisan points, but even at times when he announced positive
developments such as those dealing with job creation or poverty reduction and
also when he chose to introduce his guests.
And so it was as President Trump completed his State
of the Union address last night that we saw Pelosi slowly, and rather deliberately,
tear into pieces her copy of the speech, before then tossing the bits of paper,
also quite deliberately, back onto the desk.
Now I’m not sure what she thought she was accomplishing, but in fact all
she really accomplished by her juvenile act was to make very clear to those
watching, and who might be considering voting Democrat, that they might want to
reconsider.
Asked afterwards why she had torn up her copy of the
speech, Pelosi replied, “because it was a manifesto of mistruths.” She also issued a statement which said in
part, “The manifesto of mistruths presented in page after page of the address
tonight should be a call to action for everyone who expects truth from the
President and policies worthy of his office and the American people.” But nowhere in the statement was there any
mention made of her petulant little act of ripping up the speech.
When it comes to today’s Democrat Party it’s no
longer about the American people, that ship long ago sailed. Today it’s all about promoting every manner of
perversion imaginable, from abortion on demand to wide open borders and unfettered
illegal immigration all so they can have a permanent voting bloc. This is ALL about
power and control. I am praying for a
total landslide in November. I pray President Trump wins reelection and pray
the Republicans retake the House and retain the Senate.
Pelosi is just teed off because she sees her world
collapsing. This was her last ditch effort at relevancy before
Occasional-Cortez & Co. are able to seize total control of the Democrat Party.
It’s from this point on that we will
remain but one election away from losing our country forever. Democrats should take heed and be careful what
it is that they wish for. Because when a
‘Democrat’ president is next elected, which he or she most certainly will be,
you can then kiss this great country of ours goodbye.
What we saw from Pelosi last night was little more
than a childish temper tantrum, exacerbated, I suppose, by what is likely a
worsening case of Dementia. She is of
that age, after all, and she very clearly has lost more than a step or two. The
whole impeachment thing was a debacle. Something
is no longer right with this woman, and the mugging and childish faces during
those parts of the speech that focused on low unemployment rates for minorities
were more than just a little bizarre.
And it was someone this morning who said that the
fact that she made such a production of tearing up the speech did absolutely
nothing to erase the words that were spoken.
In fact I think it fair to say that her act of tearing up the speech
served as being little more than an exclamation point on the president’s
speech. And the act says much more about
her than it does the president and what he said. Is this now what we can expect to see as being
adult behavior from our elected officials?
And for a woman who, or so we are constantly being
told, is supposed to be so politically savvy, publicly tearing apart the president’s speech,
while 45-50 million people looked on, proves the exact opposite. She may as well have torn up the U.S.
Constitution because that is what she and her party have been doing for some
time. It was a stupid and impulsive
tantrum proving that she and her Do-Nothing Democrats have no interest in
working with President Trump on behalf of the American people.
And let’s just cut to the chase, shall we. There is
no creature on God’s Green Earth more loathsome than a Democrat politician. They are, by definition, created from a maelstrom
of infected moral filth. There is no
virtue or honor in any element of their life. It is nihilism on full display. They seek one thing only, to bring about as
much destruction and misery as possible.
Such a blatant display of disrespect should make clear to all that Democrats
are totally without honor and not worthy of respect.
And it’s Pelosi who clearly represents all that’s
gone so horribly wrong with today’s Democrat Party. More than simply being an embarrassment, she’s
a liar and a fraud. She continues to put
the needs of what’s left of her precious Democrat Party ahead of the needs of
regular Americans in her relentless effort to ‘resist’ this president. So how is it that her complete lack of
‘leadership’ will result in anything other than an even more stunningly
humiliating defeat than the one Democrats experienced in 2016.
And I think it very safe to say that what we are now
witnessing is nothing short of a hostile takeover of the Democrat Party, and
one that will essentially result in the demise of the Democrat Party as most of
us older folks have come to know it. And
as it turns increasingly Socialist, it will be when the next ‘Democrat’ is
elected president that our ability to remain a sovereign, and free, nation will
come to be very much more in doubt.
Because it simply doesn’t suit the Democrats’ long term objectives.
What suits today’s
Democrats-in-name-only, aka Socialists, reminds me of the words from an old
John Lennon song, “Imagine there's no countries, It isn't hard to do, Nothing
to kill or die for, And no religion, too, Imagine all the people, Living life
in peace.” Of course the song makes no
mention of the extreme poverty and abject misery that most would be made to
suffer in such a world, but hey it’d be a small price to pay for a world being
as one and there being “no need for greed.”
Right?
It was something that ‘Commie Chris’ Wallass said in
a recent interview with some outfit called ‘Deadline’ which is, apparently,
some sort of online news site, that nearly brought a tear to my one good eye. And it came during the interview, which was
published this past Monday, when Wallass said sometimes “it hurts” when President
Trump ‘attacks’ him. Well then perhaps
Wallass should focus on being a bit more objective and unbiased as a ‘journalist’
and less of an obviously blatant political hack who could very well be under
the employ of the Democrat Party.
And it was in referring to the criticisms that the president
has periodically directed his way that Wallass told Deadline, “I would say
that, on the one hand I understand it.”
And he said, “If I thought I’d done something wrong, it would bother me
I didn’t think I’d done anything wrong. So in a professional sense it didn’t.
But on some basic level I suppose it hurts your feelings a little bit to have
the president of the United States, whoever he or she is, attacking you.” And I think for Wallass to claim he’s been
“attacked” by President Trump is a little childish, but is typical for Wallass.
Wallass also accused President Trump of not ‘understanding’
the purpose of Fox News. He said, “I
think that the president fails to understand what Fox News is all about, which
is that we are covering the election, and there are two other two parties in
the election, the Republicans and the Democrats, and we’re going to give equal
coverage and equal exposure to both sides, and ask equally tough questions of
both sides.” But that’s not what Wallass
has a history of doing, because more often the not his version of ‘tough questions’
has typically been reserved for one side.
Wallass said, “But you know to suggest that there’s
something wrong with putting a Democrat on the show or covering a Democratic
political event, just shows a fundamental misunderstanding of what Fox News is
all about.” But that’s not what the
president is saying, and Wallass knows it.
It’s the softball approach that Wallass consistently uses whenever
interviewing any Democrat on his show, and his rather obvious attack mode, as
well has obvious hostility, he exhibits whenever interviewing anyone who
supports the president. There is no
doubt that he hates this president.
‘Commie Chris’ Wallass has indeed been the target of
the president’s ire on what has been a number of occasions, and in most cases justifiably
so. Wallass is part of what has become a
rather sizable group there at the network of those who are openly hostile when
it comes to all things related to the president. Wallass chose to criticize the president back
in December, saying during a speech that the president “is engaged in the most
direct sustained assault on freedom of the press in our history.” It was then that Wallass once again got more
than a little carried away with himself.
Look, the facts speak for themselves. And it’s the facts that Wallass would rather
choose to ignore, and instead focus on idiotic leftwing nonsense like the impeachment
of President Trump. Wallass recently
became completely unglued, on air, during a broadcast of the impeachment proceedings
where he pretty much went for the throat, figuratively of course, of fellow
panelist Katie Pavlich, telling her that she should, "Get your facts straight." Not exactly typical behavior one should
expect from someone who likes to refer to himself as a ‘journalist.’ But then it is Wallass.
And, you know, it’s a very rare event whenever
Wallass chooses to bring up any of the many successes that President Trump has
achieved. Things like more border
security, America’s new energy independence, the stock market at all-time high,
unemployment at all-time low or that real wages are rising faster at the low
end than ever before. We are out of Paris Accords and the Iran agreement. We
have NATO allies paying more than previous, our new trade agreements with
Canada, Mexico and China and our military is stronger than ever. But why would Wallass want to do that?
And by the way, President Trump understands what Fox
News is, just fine. What he doesn't understand is why a network that’s popular
with conservative and moderate Americans, although a little less so than
perhaps it once was, openly panders to the left by pushing anti-Trump talking
points down their throats via ‘Commie Chris’ and any of the other many ‘NeverTrumpers’
now at the network. Wallass just needs
to come out of the closet and admit that he’s a flaming liberal and be done
with it. President Trump is insulted on
a daily basis and you don’t hear him crying about it!
It’s NeverTrumper Wallass who always seems to go out
of his way in an effort to trash President Trump whenever he has interviewed
him and yet he thinks that’s just fine.
But God forbid it’s when President Trump decides to trash him back, and
rightfully so, that ‘Commie Chris’ gets his pretty pink panties all in a wad. But then that’s always the way it is with
these NeverTrumpers, they can dish it out but when they’re made to take any amount
of return fire they act like little crybabies.
Perhaps if Wallass can’t stand the heat he should make sure to stay out
of the kitchen.
Let’s face it, 95 percent of the bullshit that President
Trump has been forced to contend with since first assuming office has
originated with those, like ‘Commie Chris,’ on the Left. If these leftists like Wallass don’t want to be
victims of this meanie president, then perhaps they shouldn’t start things that
they have no hope of being able to finish. It’s amazing just how childlike those on the
left truly are. They call names, make accusations,
President Trump calls them on it and they slip quickly into wuss-mode. No wonder he’s cleaning your clocks at just
about every turn.
Wallass sets himself up as being some great defender
of ‘freedom of the press’ but it would seem that in his supposed effort to defend
the press he’s forgotten that the President too has the freedom of speech. And that includes criticisms of those in the
media who insist upon reporting as ‘news’ that which is nothing more than pure
propaganda. And they dare to get upset
when what they’re spewing is called ‘fake news.’ But THAT’S exactly what it is. Our President being critical of the media is
not a danger to your freedom it is simply an affirmation of that freedom.
Look, Democrats threatened impeachment even before Donald
Trump was sworn in. And they have since
tried everything to bring it about. They
tried the Trump Dossier lie, Deep State spying, Mueller investigation all with
the idea that Trump is a liar, a fraud and a thief. And with everyone in the
intelligence community including the FBI,CIA, DOJ, NSA, Britain's MI6, and
Russian trying to find something what was found. Nothing but a fail Mueller
investigation and a shampeachment. And still
they haven’t found dirt, no Russian collusion, even though ‘Pencil Neck’ still
claims he did.
Wallass is the poster boy
for all that is wrong with what was once referred to as our ‘mainstream’ media
but is today nothing more than our ‘fake news’ media. And where Republican presidents have
typically chosen to simply ignore them or to turn the other cheek, this president,
MY president, has chosen to do neither.
And I have absolutely no problem with that. And the president is spot on when he labels
this scum, those like ‘Commie Chris’, as being our enemy, because that’s what
they are and what they will continue to be until such time as they chose to
report the truth.
So it would appear that ex-secretary of state, failed
2004 presidential candidate and he who spent a very ‘arduous’, although very
brief but personally rewarding, period of time in Vietnam, now feels that he
may be just the guy to ride to the rescue of his much beloved Democrat Party. Because it would seem that John Kerry-Heinz is
perhaps starting to have second thoughts about his guy Joe, to the point where
he now fears that Bernie Sanders may actually win the 2020 Democrat nomination.
Kerry-Heinz is now said to be so unnerved about such
a prospect that he has ‘reportedly’ discussed being prepared to enter the 2020
contest himself. Right, as if that would
likely have any appreciable impact on whether or not old Bernie is able to
succeed this time around instead of like last time when he was conspired
against by the likes of Kerry-Heinz.
Most folks are able to recognize Kerry-Heinz for what he really he is, a
guy who made his money the old fashioned way, he married it!
Anyway, it was according to some NBC News ‘analyst’
who apparently overheard Kerry-Heinz having a conversation in Des Moines, Iowa,
on Sunday, during which he made it quite clear that he is more than a little worried
that a Sanders nomination will take the Democrat Party “down whole.” During the
call, he allegedly admitted that in order to run he would have to resign from
the board of Bank of America and forgo making paid speeches. Who is it that would ever pay to listen to
this boob?
And it was during this alleged phone call that
Kerry-Heinz allegedly said, “Maybe I’m fucking deluding myself,” before then
adding that Democrat donors could “raise a couple of million” since they “now
have the reality of Bernie.” Kerry-Heinz,
at least for now, continues to stand by his endorsement of ‘Crooked Joe’ Biden,
making him the highest ranking member of the Obama administration who has dared
to do so. He ‘is’ deluding himself if he
thinks there is anyone who would be willing to vote for him.
And it was following this NBC News’ report that
Kerry-Heinz tweeted, and then promptly deleted, a statement denying his
interest in entering the race. The statement
read: “I am absolutely not running for president. Any report otherwise is fucking (or
categorically) false. I’ve been proud to campaign with my good friend Joe
Biden, who is going to win the nomination, beat Trump, and make an outstanding
president.” He’s also deluding himself
if genuinely believes that to be the case.
He later retweeted his statement minus the
profanity: “As I told the reporter, I am absolutely not running for President.
Any report otherwise is categorically false. I’ve been proud to campaign with
my good friend Joe Biden, who is going to win the nomination, beat Trump, and
make an outstanding president.” I’m
assuming that he thought using the f-word was a bit too juvenile sounding and
wasn’t exactly conducive to have folks take you as being any kind of a serious
alternative to old ‘Crazy Bernie.’
So Kerry-Heinz (76) now fancies himself the savior
of the Democrat Party that is now on the verge of a complete implosion? If that’s the case can Hitlery (72) be that far
behind? Or how about Mike Dukakis (86)? Or even Al Gore (71)? That
Kerry-Heinz actually thinks he could have any measurable impact on this joke of
a contest, makes pretty clear how delusional he is. Perhaps the Democrats should focus more on
2024, because it’s then that we will have no one up to the task of being the
next Trump!
And if Bernie does actually succeed in gaining the
Democrat nomination, and does then go on to take the Democrat Party “down
whole” as Kerry-Heinz worries might be he case, the Democrats will really have
no one to blame but themselves. After
all, it is they who have allowed, and even encouraged, this leftwing insanity
to grow, and to even flourish, within their ranks and now they have the nerve
to be upset that having done so may actually bring about the demise of their own
beloved Democrat Party.
Democrats need to come to grips with the fact that
they have no one capable of defeating President Trump for the very simple, and
very obvious, reason that they have absolutely no one willing to stand up and
do what’s best for our country or to do what’s best for EVERY American in the
same way that President Trump has been willing to do, and has done. These idiots have destroyed the Democrat Party
of old, today it belongs to the socialist idiots, along with their sons and
daughters!
If Sanders represents such
an obvious danger to the Democrat Party, to the point where party leaders are
willing to pull all manner of political shenanigans to prevent him for winning the
party’s nomination, why allow him to run for president under their banner in
the first place? Because they thought
they could manage the outcome of their own primary system, just as they did in
2016. But because they allowed the bar
to be set so low all manner of clown jumped in, and that's when they lost
control.
If
nothing else the election of Donald J. Trump as President has coaxed the
Democrats out from the shadows, where they are accustomed to operate from, and to
be more ‘honest’ about what they wish for our country. And we have a prominent leftist making it quite
clear how it is that those in the Democrat Party have virtually no interest in
governing, but only in RULING, and who put forward a plan that would allow the
Democrats to RULE for years
It was
ex-Chicago mayor Rahm Emanuel who published a recent op-ed in the Wall Street
Journal in which he declared that Democrats should use the 2020 election to
establish “a new Democratic ‘metropolitan majority’ that could last for years.” The phrase “metropolitan majority” appears to
refer to the idea that Democrats’ urban power base is destined to grow as the
country becomes more diverse, especially if illegal aliens are naturalized as
citizens.
Democrats
have long predicted the demographic demise of the Republican Party, a prospect
that does worry many Republican insiders as well. President Trump has sought to buck the trend
by reaching out to the Black community in particular and highlighting the
economic gains minorities have enjoyed under his administration. Many Democrats began to worry openly last
month, after the Iowa debate, that none of their party’s candidates could win.
And it
was devout Communist, and Barry ‘O’s former ‘Green Czar, Van Jones during a
recent appearance there at ‘fake news’ HQ, also known as the Communist News
Network (CNN), who said, “I want to say that tonight for me was dispiriting.
Democrats have to do better than what we saw tonight. There was nothing I saw
tonight that would be able to take Donald Trump out.” And taking out the president has been the
Democrats’ Priority 1 for three years.
And of
course what Emanuel is talking about here would be a “metropolitan majority”
that would be made up of illegals, all manner of non-citizens and both in, or
have been, in prison. Make no mistake
here, this is the end game. First you
eliminate the Electoral College and rule with the popular vote via cities. Most states are already at the mercy of 1 or 2
large cities as is at the state level. It's already becoming a reality in many parts
of the country.
And it’s
by stating that there is even a need for such a plan that the Democrats are essentially
admitting that their party has run out, or is running out, of gullible people who
are actually stupid enough to vote for them. Democrats want the voting age to be 16, want
to allow non-citizens to vote and also seek to allow felons to vote. In other words, they want to rebuild their
gullible voter bloc to the point where they are able to make themselves
unbeatable.
All of
the problems that Democrats complain about can be found in cities that have
been run by Democrats for decades and were created by their own policies. It’s the classic con game, create a problem
and then promise to be the only one who and ‘fix’ it. Then proceed to make the problem worse and get
even more people on the train of failed promises. This is a downward spiral and it results in a
few corrupt elites benefiting and everyone else suffering.
“Metropolitan
majority” is the new name for epic vote fraud and mob rule. “By any means necessary” is their credo and
it has turned them into what is today a crime syndicate masquerading as a
political party. The Democrats seek nothing
more than to turn America into another third world cesspool using San Francisco,
and yes Chicago, as their blueprint. Likely by accident, Emanuel has made an
excellent case for keeping the Electoral College.
Our
cities are, by far, the most segregated both in terms of race but also in terms
of income equality. While the left preaches
the exact opposite, their own policies ensure that's precisely what happens,
over and over again. And now they're preaching socialism too, so we can be just
like the gems of North Korea, China, Venezuela, Cuba, and so on. It was their top candidate, Bernie Sanders, who
actually honeymooned in Russia in the 1980s!
Democrats
are so arrogant and so sure of themselves that they are giving away the way
they see the future. It will be urban
versus rural peoples who must provide food for the urban ruling elite. First they must disarm us, so that they'll
have a class of unarmed, frightened people to keep the cities maintained. They'll need some intelligent slaves to keep
the electric and the water on, as well as the street lights, traffic signals,
the trains running, etc.
It’s
quite a dystopia the Democrats have planned after the collapse of their
vote-buying, deficit spending, debt riddled economy. God help the illegals who will have to work to
maintain this two-tiered society. It will be the same as their home countries,
but with more death. The wealthy 5 or 10 percent at the top and most of the
population barely able to feed themselves and stay alive at the bottom.
‘Flyover country’ will take on new meaning.
The
future of the Democrat Party is to prolong, and to steadily make worse, the
poverty of our metropolitan areas and to continue to deceive the people into
voting for them. They will cater to envy and tell people that the only wealth
in the world is in somebody else's pocket. The people will be made to believe they are
unable achieve anything without Democrat help. Just vote for them. They can
lift you out of poverty. You can do nothing without them.
This is
what the Democrats have been doing for decades. They have turned our cities
into violent cesspools, cancerous tumors that they are desperate to do all they
can to guarantee that they will metastasize and spread throughout the rest of
the country. They are evil! There is
simply no other way to describe them or what it is that they wish in inflict
upon our country. Mark my words, to vote
Democrat is to vote for your own demise.
It is
plain to see how the Democrats intend to build upon their current urban empires.
It will be by making everyone they can except, of course, themselves poorer and
increasingly dependent upon government handouts. And they will work to make sure the masses are
kept poorly educated and fully indoctrinated in leftist ideology in our schools
designed to benefit the teachers unions rather than students. This is the game plan, and has been for some
time.
In the desperation of the
moment, Emanuel has confessed that the ultimate goal of the Marxist Democrat
Party is to incrementally and totally transform the character of America into a
totalitarian Marxist nation. Emanuel
doesn’t disagree with ANY of the Marxist lunatics currently trying to move too
quickly. He only wants to slow the pace,
so that the people won’t wise up before the point of no return has been officially
been reached!
Question: So what is a guy to do when no one any
longer goes to see the crappy movies that he insists upon making?
Answer: Of course, attack former President Reagan by
saying that his description of the Soviet Union as being an “evil empire” was
far more applicable to the United States.
It was Oliver Stone who, apparently, recently sat
down with former Ecuadorian President Rafael Correa for an interview on Russia
Today (RT), during which he insisted President Ronald Reagan’s declaring the
Soviet Union the “evil empire” should apply to the United States. It was at the height of the Cold War in 1983
when former President Reagan delivered a now-iconic speech and called the
Soviet Union an “evil empire” and as “the focus of evil in the modern world.”
It was during the interview that Stone said, “Empires
fall. Let’s pray that this empire, these evil things… because we are the evil empire.” And he went on to say, “What Reagan said
about Russia is true about us.” Always a
fervent critic of American foreign policy and a fervent supporter of just about
every authoritarian regime you can think of, Stone floated his theory that
Hollyweird producers have blacklisted him because his movies no longer follow
the mainstream pro-war narrative.
He said, “Hollywood has changed since 2001. It has
become more censored. The military, the CIA, the depictions of these organizations
has been very favorable.” And he said, “You
can take the budgets down… let’s say you want to make a film criticizing the
American military, taking an Iraq war story or a horror story that recently
happened in Iran.” Stone continued by
saying, “You do those kinds of stories, it’s not going to happen.” What’s he talking about, of course they
happen.
Stone also took aim at senior Democrat Party figures
such as ‘Crooked Joe’ and Hitlery for being pro-war, adding that American
politics has simply become “right-wings fighting with right-wings.” He said, “There
is no party in the United States, there is no democratic voice except third
parties that are small, that would say ‘Why are we fighting wars?’” And added, “I
don’t hear it from any of the major candidates, except one or two on the
Democratic side, but they don’t have a chance of winning.”
He said, “In other words, Hillary Clinton … and Joe
Biden are just as pro-war as any Republican Dick Cheney. They just do it in a
different way. Maybe it shows you how locked up America is, how so far to the
right America has gone that Hillary Clinton is recognized as a Democrat. I
can’t believe it. There’s no real left
in America in power. It’s all right-wings fighting with right-wings. As Putin
said in the interviews I did with him, ‘It doesn’t make a difference who is
President of the United States.”
Hitlery is on the right? What the Hell has this moron been smokin’,
snortin’ or shootin’ up? Those on the
left just can’t help themselves, they open their mouths and lie. They slander the country that made it
possible for them to achieve an incredible level of success. There are few countries where they would not
have been afforded the same opportunities. It is this country and its Constitution
that they hold in such disdain that made it possible for them to become as successful
as they have.
So why is it that he simply doesn’t choose to leave? The only ones by whom he might be missed
would be the many other ingrates who live in that same protective bubble in
their gated communities with their armed guards. God knows the heartland doesn't give a rat’s
behind whether he stays or goes. He made
his fortune and fame in this the greatest country in the world, and now he
calls it evil? To simply say he’s a
hypocrite somehow comes up a little short, because he’s so much more than that.
And it’s nothing that these Hollyweirdos support that
makes even a lick of sense. Most of what they say makes no sense. Hollyweird
seems to be a total contradiction from the rest of the country. And it’s the kind of criticism that Stone
levels at America that doesn't happen in any of the totalitarian nations he
seems to be so in favor of. So again I
will ask, why is this man still here? He
said he was leaving when Bush 43 was elected and again when President Trump was
elected. And yet he’s STILL here!
It’s too bad that these leftists can’t convince the
millions of people still trying to get into this country, illegally, what a
Hellhole America really is. Perhaps then
they might stop trying to come here. Actually,
the REAL Evil Empire is Hollyweird, also known as the land of pedophiles, perverts,
sexual deviants of every stripe, women abusers, the drug addled and STD
infected, and the truly evil and demented who actually “celebrate” abortion! And you’ll find no illegals in THEIR
neighborhoods!
America is the greatest nation in the world, and
there is no one is holding Stone prisoner here. And if you’re able to openly declare that the
country in which you live is part of some “evil empire” without any risk of
persecution, imprisonment or worse, and that the same country has a Constitution
that ensures your right to free speech, you’re probably not living in an “evil”
country. Perhaps Stone should try living
in China, Russia, Iran, etc. and letting their governments know what you think
of them.
And it’s according to leftists like Stone that
places like North Korea, Cuba, Venezuela and other leftist dictatorships have
all been, and continue to be, victims of the “evil” America. They want Socialism to control people through
the state. The left is like the most malignant
form of cancer. Everything those on the
left touch, very quickly turns to shit.
And yet we have those like Stone working hard to champion it as being the
magic cure for every ailment suffered not only here in America, but everywhere.
Now of course everything this guy say defies
logic. America, though far from perfect,
has been the greatest force for GOOD in history. It has repeatedly stood against evil at great
cost, both monetarily and in human lives, to itself. We fought two world wars to LIBERATE, not to subjugate,
millions of souls from tyranny and oppression. Then spent vast sums of money to
rebuild war-torn countries across the planet. Then, we continue to defend them
and help them improve their standards of living.
And this fool, and all of those
like him, doesn't like it and calls its evil.
And just who is it that he thinks is listening to him. Now I’m sure it was a great many of his
friends in Hollyweird who were cheering him on during this pathetic interview. But
is this how you entice people, with the amount of money it costs these days, to
see your movies? Personally I can’t
remember the last time I went to the movies, and the number one reason I don’t
go to the movies anymore is because of people like this asshole!
