THE DEMOCRATS CONTEMPLATING ANOTHER IMPEACHMENT ATTEMPT???

Where do you suppose the Democrat Party would find itself today had it chosen to simply accept their candidate’s loss in 2016, and proceeded to work with the new president where they could and opposed him where they felt they must?  Would their chances of winning the upcoming election be better or worse than they currently are?  And perhaps a more important question is would ‘Creepy Joe’ Biden be their chosen candidate had they foregone all of the craziness and accepted defeat like adults?

It was current Speaker of the House ‘Crazy Nancy’ Pelosi who said during Sunday’s broadcast of ABC’s “This Week,” indicted that the craziness is likely not yet over saying that Democrat lawmakers have plenty of “arrows in our quiver,” when asked if impeachment was an option for Democrats to use as a way to prevent a lame-duck Supreme Court nomination should President Trump lose the White House in November and the vacancy following the passing of Justice Ginsburg has not been filled.

And it was former Clinton hack turned faux journalist and now supposed ‘anchor’ George ‘Stephy’ Stephanopoulos who said, “Let me press you though on what happens. You want people to get out and vote. And even that’s no guarantee that the White House and Senate Republicans won’t try to push through a Supreme Court nomination in a lame-duck session even if Joe Biden wins on November 3rd, even if Democrats win, pick up seats in the House, and maybe even the Senate.”

Stephy then went on to say, “So what can you do then? Some have mentioned the possibility if they try to push through a nominee in a lame-duck session that you and the House can move to impeach President Trump or Attorney General Barr as a way of stalling and preventing the Senate from acting on this nomination.”  So let me get this straight, the new plan is to impeach the President in order to prevent him from carrying out his lawful duties as President?  How exactly is that supposed to work?

‘Crazy Nancy’ said, “Well, we have our options. We have arrows in our quiver that I’m not about to discuss right now, but the fact is we have a big challenge in our country. This president has threatened to not even accept the results of the election with statements that he and his henchmen have made. So right now, our main goal and I think Ruth Bader Ginsburg would want that to be to protect the integrity of the election, that we protect the American people from the coronavirus.”

And Stephy pressed, “To be clear, you’re not taking any arrows out of your quiver and not ruling anything out.”  And ‘Crazy Nancy’ responded by saying, “Yeah, we have a responsibility. We’ve taken an oath to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States. We have a responsibility to meet the needs of the American people. That is when we weigh the equities of protecting our democracy requires us to use every arrow in our quiver.”  Democrats protecting and defending the Constitution?

Lame Duck?  Democrats are again playing games with language.  ‘BO’ WAS a lame duck as he was in the last year of his second term and was ineligible to run again.  That is not the case with President Trump. He IS eligible to run for another term and IS doing do!  He has every right to fill a Supreme Court vacancy, that’s what he ran on.  Democrats are trying to make this an apples-to-apples comparison, but it is NOT! President Trump is eligible to run and serve another term, whereas ‘BO’ was not.

The script called for Ruthie to just hold out until Hitlery was handed the presidency in 2016, where Ruthie would then hand the opportunity of picking a new Supreme Court nominee to Hitlery.  But the American people had something different in mind, and voted Donald Trump into office.  Ruthie thought she was greater than God, and that she could allow only Democrats to replace her.  Her high opinion of herself blew up in her face.  And so we have another example of what goes around, comes around!

Perhaps ‘Crazy Nancy’ should spend some time actually reading the Constitution instead of merely spewing what she thinks it says.  Because nowhere does it state the president, any president regardless of political party, does not have the authority to nominate a Supreme Court Justice at any point in time during his, or her, term in office.  And now the Democrats are actually threatening to impeach the president for doing exactly what it is that the president is obligated, by the Constitution, to do.

Ruthie should have retired a year ago, she was just hanging on long enough for the replacement appointment to carry over until the next presidential term. Republicans can match that game by proceeding with a prompt replacement nomination.  Since we already know a legal fight is looming regarding mail-in-ballots and the vote count it is obvious that time is now of the essence.  Replace Ginsburg now!  The legal fight will no doubt rise to the Supreme Court level and we need a full court to rule.

Now granted, while I am most definitely not the political, or legislative, genius that ‘Crazy Nancy’ professes to be, but I'm just not sure how this latest impeachment strategy by the Democrats could work to actually delay a confirmation vote on a Supreme Court appointment in the Senate.  Is there some law or Senate rule that requires action on an impeachment by the House before they can conduct any other business?  I am not aware that any such requirement might actually exist.

Look, ‘Crazy Nancy’ can come up with a dozen reasons to impeach the president every single day between now and the election and the Senate can choose to simply ignore them, vote them all down one at a time or vote them down en masse, it simply doesn’t matter.  The only truly important thing now is to put in place a new justice before the election, and that’s where the focus must be.  Granted, being saddled as we are with several RINOs it won’t be easy, but it is something that must be done.

The root cause of the failure of most of our government agencies is the failure of the citizens of this nation to take an active part in their government. A Constitutional Republic requires that its citizens take an active role in the process of government, a government BY the people. Once we abandoned our responsibility to maintain control over our elected ‘leaders’ we gave away our country.  So far, we still have a chance to reclaim most of it but only if we act quickly, but it’s going to be an uphill battle.

WHY MUST IT ALWAYS BE THE DEMOCRATS’ WAY, OR NOT AT ALL…

So riddle me this, what the Hell is it that makes today’s radical left wing Democrats think they, and their cockamamie vision for America is so damn special?   And why should those of us who DO still love this country be forced to accept that vision because faux justices say we must?  And I think it’s important, even crucial, to keep in mind here is that the goal of the Democrats has been, is now, and always will be to move the court to be far more progressive, not to have the justices rule based on the Constitution, but instead based solely on their very leftist political beliefs.

And it was just this past Saturday, during an appearance on MSDNC’s “PoliticsNation,” that ex-attorney general Eric ‘I’m A Racist And Damn Proud Of It’ Holder told fellow racist and host Al Sharpton that if the Republicans succeed in confirming a replacement for Ruth Bader Ginsburg, appointed by President Trump, a future Democrat Senate majority along with ‘Creepy Joe’ Biden, if he is elected president, God forbid, should consider what he described as “court reform.”  According to Holder, such a measure would mean adding justices to the Supreme Court.

Holder said, “You would put in place — if this is allowed to happen, a 6-3 court.”  He said, “And with all the issues you have talked about, you would have a conservative majority — or illegitimate conservative majority on the court ruling on the matters that will affect the nation for generations to come. One of the realities is if Merrick Garland had been confirmed, as he should have been, there would have been a progressive majority for the past three years. And think what about that meant.”  But, no doubt, he would be in favor if the result were a 6-3 ‘progressive’ majority.

Holder added, “So I think if, if in fact, they are successful in placing a justice on the court, I think that what Democrats have to do, assuming that Biden is president and there is a Senate majority for the Democrats, we need to think about court reform. And at a minimum, as part of that reform package, I think additional justices need to be placed on the Supreme Court.”  There’s something that ‘BO’ used to say about elections having consequences.  But apparently that too is something that is only allowed to cut one way, that is only when Democrats win elections.

It’s the ‘Dingy Harry’ Reid effect that Mitch McConnell warned them about when ‘Dingy Harry’ killed the fillibuster and put the Democrats in the mess they now find themselves in.  If they can do it, we can do it.  Perhaps President Trump should act preemptively and move to increase the size of the court right now.  President Trump should nominate his entire list and have them all on the Supreme Court.  But again, with our many spineless RINOs in the Senate such a thing would never get off the ground.  Meanwhile it’s every Democrat who sings from the very same sheet of music.

The idea that an appointment by President Trump should somehow be considered as ‘illegitimate’ is patently absurd. There is no question that President Trump has the Constitutional and legal authority to nominate a replacement and that the current Senate has the Constitutional and legal authority to confirm.  And who actually thinks that if the Democrats held the Presidency, as well as a majority in the Senate, they would not be putting up a nominee as early as tomorrow?  Of course they would!  So why is it somehow not to be tolerated when Republicans attempt the same thing?  

It’s disgusting that Holder can bring himself to complain because only three justices are activist justices, who are able to concoct all manner nutty rationales to somehow justify their claim that the Constitution does somehow provide for so much of what those on the left continues to try to force upon this country, when it so very clearly does not!  Holder seems to favor all of the justices simply making shit up because that way the left wouldn’t need to rely on Congress.  The left could simply advance its agenda through the courts, which is something the Founders vehemently opposed.

The Democrats are ALWAYS trying to cheat and to change the rules in the middle of the game to give them an unfair advantage.  They want to threaten unending riots unless they are given back power and control.  They want to change the voting age to 16 so that they might trick young uninitiated kids into falling for their lies.  They want to pack the Supreme Court so that they never have to worry about the will of the people and can simply interpret things however they wish.  It’s never about the Constitution, it never has been, it’s all about moving the agenda forward.

They want to do away with the Electoral College so that mob rule of a few large states will determine all future elections.  They want to allow mail-in voting without any safeguards in place and no ability to determine the veracity of the election process or chain of evidence.  And as most of them tend to sexual deviants, as is their nominee for president, they want to expose our children as young as age 4 to all manner of bizarre sexual behaviors so that they are able to create for themselves a steady supply of sexualized children and compliant sexually stunted child-adults.

And as is usually the case, in situations just as this, the problem lies not just with the Democrats, but with many of those on our own side, those we not so fondly refer to as RINOs.  You know the ones, those with names like Collins, Murkowski and Romney to name only a few.  But Collins, who has said we should wait until after the election, has also said, or so I have heard, that at least committee hearings can go ahead.  I think that means she will cooperate but may need something to wave at her many liberal supporters.  But she is another who I trust about as far as I could throw her.

Murkowski is tougher, somewhat dependent on real leftists (not primarily for votes), but not unreachable by her constituents.  As for Romney, I think we can go ahead and write him off right now.  He’s driven by nothing else than his hatred of the president.  The one thing that the Democrats always do, is something that Republicans rarely, if every do, they always stick together, ALWAYS.  You never hear any Democrat speaking independently from the rest of his party.  But RINOs or not, the president must move forward with nominating a replacement for Justice Ginsburg!

BURN IN HELL, RUTHIE!!!

It’s not important when Ruth Bader Ginsburg died, all that’s truly important is that she’s finally dead.  If for no other reason than because of how many millions of unborn babies have been butchered because of this evil old bitch.  She’s another who died the death that she spent a lifetime earning.  When on the court it was not the proper interpretation of the Constitution that was her primary concern, it was how best to bastardize it.  She needs to be replaced with someone who IS able to interpret the Constitution as written and not read into it garbage that was never there.  

And so the Supreme Court announced this past Friday evening that Ruthie, the high court’s most senior liberal justice, had apparently died due to complications from metastatic pancreatic cancer at the ripe old age of 87-years-old.  And it was according to National Public Radio, (NPR) that days before her passing, Ginsburg dictated the following statement to her granddaughter, Clara Spera: “My most fervent wish is that I will not be replaced until a new president is installed.”  And that alone really does tell us all that we really need to know about this disgusting old hag.  

Ruthie had been on the court since 1993, appointed by then president ‘Slick Willy’ Clinton. Only Justice Clarence Thomas had served longer among the current members of the court.  In August, President Trump made the pledge to fill a Supreme Court vacancy if one were to open up in 2020, despite it being an election year.  President Trump said during an interview with radio host Hugh Hewitt, who asked him about the Supreme Court, “Absolutely, I’d do it.”  He now needs to follow through with that pledge, and the spineless Mitch McConnell needs to make the confirmation happen!

And let’s be honest here, one doesn’t just suddenly die of Metastatic Pancreatic cancer, it simply doesn’t happen.  She’s likely been in Hospice care for at least a few months, refusing to resign and thus provide enough time for President Trump to nominate a successor. This is NOT the behavior of an impartial jurist, this is the behavior of a pathetic, and very partisan, hack in a black robe.  She was the most divisive activist judge in the history of the court, and THAT is hard to do. She was a partisan politician to the very end living in their politics like it was a religion.

And despite the fact that there will likely not enough Republican votes in the Senate to get it done, because of pathetic RINOs like Romney, Murkowski, Collins, and likely even Graham who will al vote against it, that does not mean that the attempt should not be made.  And, of course, the excuse that will be made is that we need to wait for the election.  But I think we all know that if the Democrats held the Senate in a similar situation that they would move forward.  The country is at stake and the time has come for us to start playing the game the same way that the opposition does.

Look, we ALL know what would happen if the Democrats were in control and Chuckie Schumer were in Mitch McConnell’s place.  Their replacement justice would be confirmed within a week.  Steamrolled through an abbreviated confirmation process and confirmed in record time, in fact.  But instead, we will now see them make all manner of threats and do all that they can to obstruct the orderly process that every prior administration has been given in the exact set of circumstances.  Democrats continue to make clear that they don’t care about Americans, only about power.

And we all know that Ruthie made no bones about her refusal to retire until after the election in order to prevent handing to President Trump another opportunity to appoint yet another Supreme Court Justice.  She was essentially little more than an invalid but refused to do the right thing because of her politics.  And frankly it’s for that very reason that President Trump should not stand on ceremony or give her a period of mourning before replacing her.  He will just be getting the opportunity that he was supposed to have some time ago if she had bothered to honor her oath!

So what was Ruthie really like?  Well if we were to look back during her confirmation hearing we would hear Senator Orrin Hatch ask her a questions regarding the hiring of minority clerks and posed the question that if one had hired no minority clerks in one’s entire career should that actually disqualify one for a federal judgeship?  And, of course, Ruthie said that it should.  Senator Hatch then pointed out the fact that, as a Federal judge, Ruthie had made 23 law clerk appointments and all of them, every single one, had been white males.  Just one of those things that make you go hmmm.

Ruthie was nothing if not a hardcore liberal of the very worst kind, and as such she was a selfish egomaniac by definition.  She never really cared about the Constitution or even the future of the Supreme Court.  She only cared about her own power, and in being able to assist in advancing the cause of bringing down the country.  That’s why she refused to retire and allow ‘BO’ to replace her.  Thank God she was such a stubborn power-monger, because now it’s President Trump who will get the opportunity to replace her.  What a very happy ending to the ballad of Ruthie.

And you know, whether the claim of her ‘dying wish’ is accurate or not it only serves to demonstrate just how power-hungry these liberals truly are and how desperate the they are to both obtain, and then to retain, power for as long as they can.  You really have to be a Godless person to worry about maintaining the power you possess as your life in this world is about to expire and the instant you meet your maker and Judge is about to occur.  These people are evil to their core.  Ruthie was sinister and her contempt for the unborn was sickening.  The world is a better place without her.

I guess my only concern is that working to replace her will take a lot energy and could, very possible, end up diverting attention away from stopping the election fraud that we know is coming. It’s going to be a fulltime job for President Trump and the Republicans for the next month and a half.  So we may win the battle but lose the war.  If they win the presidency Democrats will provide amnesty to the millions here illegally.  If they also win the Senate and hold the House they won’t let the Supreme Court stop them and completely take over the country one way or another.

JOHN KERRY-HEINZ, PROVEN WRONG AGAIN…

Yup, by golly, it was John Kerry-Heinz, or he who was an absolute cracker-jack secretary of state, who has been bested by a political novice and someone who was essentially a stranger to the world of international diplomacy by achieving something that this self-professed guru of foreign policy once claimed could never be achieved.  And in so doing, President Trump has again exposed those like Kerry-Heinz as being what we all knew them to be, completely incompetent.  President Trump handily runs circles around all of these clowns, and yet oddly enough his opponent in the race for president is the guy of whom it was once said “is someone who has been wrong on almost every foreign policy and national security issue for the last four decades.”

I bring this up only because of a recently resurfaced video in which we see a very confident John Kerry-Heinz lecturing on the impossibilities of achieving that which the Trump administration actually achieved just this past week in what was yet another blow to Kerry-Heinz and the Democrat establishment’s long-held foreign policy doctrines.  In the clip it is ex-president ‘BO’s secretary of state, Kerry-Heinz, who is seen bashing the notion that peace between Israel and Arab states could ever be achieved without first solving the Palestinian conflict.  Yet no one cares about the Palestinians, except Democrats. The Arab states don’t want them, they’re terrorists and the dregs of the middle east. The same way Democrats are in this country.

And so it was with much poo-pooing from Democrats that this week we saw Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu joining with leaders from Bahrain and the United Arab Emirates in an epic ceremony, signing peace agreements and effectively normalizing relations between the nations, as the Trump administration brokered two major Middle East agreements in a matter of weeks.  So contrary to Kerry-Heinz’s declarations, the peace agreements were achieved without the need for any Israeli concessions or on the conditioning of Palestinian statehood. Neither President Trump nor Prime Minister Netanyahu even mentioned the Palestinians during the ceremony, which President Trump hailed as the “dawn of a new Middle East.”

It was during his last weeks as ‘BO’s secretary of state that Kerry-Heinz made a bold prediction about the Middle East: Arabs will not pursue a “separate peace” with Israel in the absence of peace between Israel and the Palestinians.  On the heels of Tuesday’s historic signing ceremony of normalization agreements between Israel and the United Arab Emirates as well as Bahrain, Kerry-Heinz’s confident statements are memorable for how utterly wrong they were.  But if we were to take the time to look back over his time spent as both a U.S. Senator and as secretary of state we would see that he was never right, about much of anything.  And still he has yet to make any comment regarding these new, and very significant, agreements.    

It was in this recently resurfaced clip of Kerry-Heinz’s speech at the 13th annual Saban Forum, in December 2016, at the end of the ‘BO’ administration, that Kerry-Heinz made the claim that “I’ve heard several prominent politicians in Israel sometimes saying, well, the Arab world is in a different place now, we just have to reach out to them, and we can work some things with the Arab world, and we’ll deal with the Palestinians. No, no, no, and no.”  Kerry-Heinz continued and indicated what U.S. policy must be, saying, “There will be no advanced and separate peace with the Arab world without the Palestinian process and Palestinian peace. Everybody needs to understand that.”  Kerry-Heinz concluded saying, “That is a hard reality.”

This was not the first time that Kerry-Heinz had been dead wrong about Middle East policy. I’m sure most will remember how Kerry-Heinz was a key architect of the failed Iran nuclear deal struck in 2015, which aimed at capping Tehran’s nuclear activities in return for lifting sanctions.  Kerry-Heinz later warned against the consequences of pulling out of the deal.  In 2015, Kerry-Heinz said, “I fear that what could happen is if Congress were to overturn it, our friends in Israel could actually wind up being more isolated and more blamed.”  However, President Trump pulled out of the Iran nuclear deal and his recent Middle East peace agreements showed that Kerry-Heinz was wrong again when predicting that Israel would be more isolated without the deal.

And again in 2017 Kerry-Heinz warned of “an absolute explosion” in the Middle East should President-elect Donald Trump move the U.S. embassy to Jerusalem.  And President Trump moved the embassy and no such explosion occurred.  A year after the controversial move, the U.S. ambassador to Israel, David Friedman, wrote in Israel Hayom that “Contrary to all the negative predictions, the Jerusalem embassy has been an extraordinary success, advancing peaceful coexistence, bilateral cooperation and cultural exchange between and among Israelis, Palestinians and Americans.”  Kerry-Heinz himself hardly contributed to any peaceful coexistence or cooperation between Israelis and Palestinians during his entire tenure as secretary of state.

Kerry-Heinz spent three years, tens of billions of dollars in bribe money and demanded nothing in the way concessions from the Iranians just to sign a ‘deal’ with them.  And yet this is someone who we’re supposed to believe is the Democrats’ ‘expert’ when it comes to the subject of foreign affairs?  No wonder the bumbling, drooling, senile ‘Creepy Joe’ Biden is the smartest and most competent Democrat alive.  Those in our ‘fake news’ media will never ask Kerry-Heinz why he was so wrong on a peace deal between Israel and Arab countries. Also, they will never ask ‘BO’ why he predicted, wrongly, that manufacturing jobs would never come back to America.  It took a businessman, not a politician, thinking outside the box, to be successful.

Kerry-Heinz in particular, and the Democrats in general, have always gotten it wrong. At least Jimmy Carter was able to get the Egyptians to the table but that was only after they had suffered yet another military defeat by the Israeli's.  The Palestinians have been the roadblock to every Peace Agreement effort, every one of them. President Trump was smart enough to find a way to remove the road block and move to a Peace Accord that in time will include the Palestinians as now they will have to change their dedication to obstruction and shift towards compromise or be left out of the process entirely, permanently.  The Establishment Elite simply cannot handle President Trump’s success that has eluded every President since the 1950’s.

And of course Kerry-Heinz will again predict failure, it’s exactly what people like him do.  That this new peace deal stands to regionally unite the Arab world against the leading state sponsor of terror, and its proxies, is a reality that will contain radical Islam and further trade deals away from Iran.  Kerry-Heinz’s Iranian friends are already dealing with a massive trade deficit and growing internal unrest and are now looking at complete collapse as being a stark reality in the not too distant future should, as the president says they will, the rest of the Middle East sign on.  If that does happen the money will dry up resulting in no Hamas, no Taliban and no ISIS.  The deal effectively cuts the Iranian radicals’ financial legs out from under them.

And just for a little clarification, there is no such thing as a Palestinian state, in fact it’s in all of recorded history there has never been a political entity known as Palestine.  This term, rather is a description of a region similar to a term like ‘the mid-west.’  There is no such thing as a Palestinian people.  There are tribes of Arabs, many nomadic, who lived in the area, but have no genealogical or cultural commonality.  On the other hand, the Jewish state has existed for millennia, and is today the only functioning democracy in the region.  In addition to the cultural bonds of religion, there is a genealogical sub-category of people known as Jews.  And it’s this group of people who still centers their existence in a small strip of land, Israel.

How do I articulate how it was that John Kerry-Heinz made ‘it’ in politics?  He’s not very bright, does anyone remember when he was running against Bush in 2004 as the “intellectual” one in the race yet his grades at Yale were worse than Bush’s?  He got into Yale because his father went there, not because he was gifted academically.  He joined the military to advance a political career not to ‘serve’ his country. The Swift Boat Veterans exposed that little missive as he tried to ride his barely 100 days in Vietnam to the Presidency. There were guys that spent THREE years in country in Vietnam with far LESS decorations, but certainly far MORE deserving.  Lastly, this turd did figure out one thing, how to marry money.  He has done it TWICE!

And finally, how is it that a man with no background in politics and/or world diplomacy accomplish what years of academics, policy wonks, ambassadors, diplomats, presidents, and others failed to do.  Number one, outside the box thinking. He told his people approach this from an economic front, sell that, leave the old stumbling blocks behind, Palestine for one. This is the difference between an academic, ‘BO’, Clinton, Biden, G.W. Bush, Kerry-Heinz, and a Donald Trump. We talkers versus a doer.  A talker does not get anything done of substance, it washes away in short order.  A doer has accomplishments that will outlive him, or her, and that’s what President Trump has achieved here, and it’s why the talkers hate him.

FILE THIS ONE UNDER: ‘YOU JUST CAN’T MAKE THIS SHIT UP!!!’

You know, I’ve kind of lost track of just how many times those of us who continue to support the president have been referred to, by Democrats, and more than a few RINOs, as being nothing short of absolute morons.  And yet, these are the very same people who seem unable to connect the dots when it comes to their calls for abolishing and/or defunding the polices and their continuing attacks on police who are only doing their job, and the fact that crime in our cities is very much on the rise.  

There’s an old adage that says, ‘Be careful what you wish for,’ which is quite fitting when it comes to the boobs who comprise the Minneapolis city council, who first unanimously supported a pledge to abolish the police and are now asking, “Where are the police?”  This should cause most intelligent people to call into question how it was that these same people managed to get themselves elected in the first place.  Because, after all, just what was it that these imbeciles expected to have happen? 

It was Minnesota Public Radio (MPR) which recently reported that the city council met with Minneapolis’ head of police on Tuesday: “Just months after leading an effort that would have defunded the police department, City Council members at Tuesday’s work session pushed Chief Medaria Arradondo to tell them how the department is responding to the violence.”  Now had I been Chief Arradondo I’m pretty sure I would have responded by asking these very same dopes, “How do think we’re responding?”

And apparently it was newly elected member Jamal Osman who said, “Residents are asking, ‘Where are the police?’”  This same moron, Osman, added, “That is the only public safety option they have at the moment. MPD. They rely on MPD. And they are saying they are nowhere to be seen.”  Council President Lisa Bender suggested police are intentionally not arresting people.  And she actually had the gonads to claim, “This is not new, but it is very concerning in the current context.”  Seriously?

Chief Arradondo did inform the boobs on the council that over 100 officers have left the department just this past year, including those who have taken leave, and MPR noted that is “more than double the usual number of officers who either step down from the department or who are inactive each year.”  Which should come as virtually no surprise to any of these geniuses on this ‘council.’  Again, what was it, exactly, that these morons expected to have happen?   Were cops just supposed to take it?     

And it was one member of this stellar little group, Fourth Ward council member Phillipe Cunningham, who expressed surprise that council members, who had so recently supported doing away with the police department, were now calling on the police to be doing more.  And it was his suggestion to focus, instead, on using money taken from the police budget to hire “violence interrupters” and put them in place to prevent crime in the first place.  What an absolutely ‘brilliant’ idea.  Not!!!

And just to remind everyone, it was back on June 12 that it was reported this same Minneapolis city council had unanimously voted to support a pledge to abolish the police.  These people are stupid, but then so must be the people who put them into office.  And you know it’s like what’s going on in so many of our major, Democrat controlled cities, those who live there are getting exactly what they themselves voted for, so excuse me if I don’t have much sympathy.  You voted vote for these people!

So this idiotic suggestion to go out and hire “violence interrupters,” what the Hell is that all about?  So, instead of us who support the president being the ones who are so stupid, it would seem to me that it’s those who continue to vote for anti-police Democrats who are the ones proving themselves to be more than a little mentally deficient.  And make no mistake, it’s anyone who continues to vote for ANY Democrat that is just as much an enemy of freedom as those Democrats that they vote for.

Here’s the thing, once the police know, for an absolute fact, that they are going to have their lives completely destroyed for simply doing their jobs, they will do as little as possible from then on.  Guaranteed, every time, everywhere.  And who can blame them?  But with said, if one feels that one is unable to do the job as one thinks it should be done, one really should at least consider, looking for another line of work.  To do anything other than that makes you no better than your basic Democrat.

This City Council approved the restraint methods used in the Floyd case and required officers to be trained on them.  And the City’s own Medical Examiner stated Floyd died of a heart attack brought on by a massive Fentanyl overdose.  Meanwhile, the officers involved and who showed zero animosity, much less racial animosity, toward the victim are charged with 2nd degree murder, which requires proof of intent, for doing precisely as they were trained to do, and which played no part in Floyd’s death.

Charges were filed even BEFORE any of the facts were known, and when the facts did come out they buried them and kept the charges.  So, where are the police?  Where in the Hell do these people think they are?  They’re trying not to have their lives ruined by the mob by on-line lynch mobs, and the blatantly corrupt Democrats politicians who are in charge of running this hellhole of a city.  They’re doing the best they can to keep their heads down and trying not to get involved in any situations at all.

Democrats, more often than not, are the source of some pretty nasty “unintended consequences”.  This is just like California screaming about ‘climate change,’ and the horrors of burning fossil fuels. They insist on “saving the forests” by ignoring them. They refuse to manage old, dead wood and thick growth allowing forests to become tinderboxs. Now they're polluting the entire country while they watch their idea of conservation burn to ashes, taking their precious protected species with them.

While you most definitely can’t fix stupid, what you most certainly can do is to vote it out of office, or just save yourself a lot of grief by never voting it into office in the first place. Democrats have sown the seeds of which they are now reaping the natural result.  But as usual, they’re never responsible. Defund the mayor and the city council!  Enact laws that allow for their prosecution and removal of their immunity because they are the corrupt politicians that allowed their city to become a shithole.

And what point is there for the police to be arresting criminals when there’s no bail and when leftist District Attorneys, who have bought and paid for by George Soros, have no intention, whatsoever, of bringing any charges.  Even the mentally impaired Minneapolis City Council should be able to understand that.  Now get on with your defunding and shut down the police department and continue to crow about how you got rid of the racist pigs and improved the quality of life in this City of Morons.

And to be honest, if this doesn’t make the point, better than anything else ever could, that liberalism truly is a mental disorder, then there is nothing that ever will.  This city council is the net result of lazy voters.  So the fact that they chose not to stand by their police, but are now complaining that they’re not doing their job speaks volumes, or should!  The voters in this city, like every other Democrat controlled city, need to at least consider making some pretty drastic changes in who they vote for.  

Citizens have a right to know how it is that these so-called ‘violence interrupters’ (social workers) are going to be able to stop riots, bank robberies, carjackings, gang shootouts, speeders and the million other things that we rely on our police officers to deal with every single day.  Sure, in a perfect world we could defund the police, but the last time checked the world that we currently live in is far from perfect.  This will only lead to more killing and crime. And it will minorities who will suffer the most.

The American people have been patient long enough!  The time has come to show the power-hungry Democrats what we think of them and their platform of ‘social justice.’ We must vote like our lives depend on it!  We have a president who has the heart of a lion, he roars loudly and bigly and he stands proudly for liberty and freedom for all of us.  The message we choose to send this November must be sent loud and clear. And that message is, “We’re mad as Hell and we’re not going to take it anymore!”

YES, MY FRIENDS, THERE IS NO DOUBT, JUAN WILLIAMS TRULY IS A MORON…

I have often wondered aloud regarding the fact if Juan Williams is truly the moron he appears to be, or if he only chooses to play one on television.  Well, it was earlier this week, on Tuesday to be exact, that those tuned into Fox News’ ‘The Five,’ were provided with the long awaited answer to that very question.  And the answer is a resounding yes, Williams truly is a moron.  And not just your run of the mill kind of moron, but a moron who likely has never had an original thought in his entire life and one who is able to do nothing more than to regurgitate Democrat talking points

Now oddly enough, where most folks would view, as being rather impressive, President Trump’s ongoing effort to bring some level of peace and stability to, what has been for decades, the most volatile region on the entire planet, it was Williams who said, on Tuesday, that President Trump was doing nothing more than to “stir up a proxy war” by brokering deals between Israel and Bahrain and the United Arab Emirates.  Now, I would argue that in making such a statement Williams left virtually no doubt that yes, he truly is a moron and does not merely play one on television.

And what should also come as absolutely no surprise is how during the same segment of “The Five” Williams then proceeded to strenuously defend ‘Crazy Nancy’ Pelosi’s idiotic claim that the recent deals normalizing relations between Israel and the two Middle Eastern nations should be seen as being nothing more than a “distraction,” rather than any kind of an accomplishment.  And it was ‘Cohost’ Greg Gutfeld who then weighed in on the deals, saying that they were a clear reflection of President Trump’s two favorite mottos: “I like to make deals” and “let’s see what happens.”

And it was Gutfeld who also went on to argue that President Trump was not being held back by past failures or ideology because he didn’t really subscribe to either one.  Gutfeld said, “It’s a big contrast with Joe Biden. Biden will never impress you with like great, great, greatness. He’s the master of the little move. You know, he’s the expression of warmth, looking good in aviator sunglasses and the bomber jacket, the effortless smile. But he will never pull this off. Only somebody that is able to jump off a cliff on an idea can make this happen.”  And on that he’s exactly right!

And it was Jesse Watters who then added that removing the United States from the Iran deal had also played a part, forcing other players in the region to reassess their alliances.  And Katie Pavlich then put the question to Williams, asking why he thought Pelosi had referred to the deal as “a distraction.”  Williams said, “Because it is. You know, this is a moment that you can look at the situation and say the real trouble here is between the Palestinians and the Israelis, and that situation has not been helped.”  There can no longer be any doubt that this guy truly is a complete moron.

Williams said, “It opens the door to some possibilities. But the real action here is in the United States giving arms, giving serious arms to UAE, potentially to go after the Iranians. So what we’re doing is stirring up a proxy war.”  And he went on to say, “That doesn’t diminish the chance of war or disruption in the Middle East. It accelerates it. So I think we have to just look honestly at this, we have to note that it’s taking place in the midst of an intense American election and that what’s going on at the White House. Nobody is fooled by it.” Nope, nobody’s fooled.  What a moron!

And then this moron went on to add, “There’s certainly reason for hope, but let’s not fool ourselves.”  At which point Pavlich added, “You’d hope the normalization of Arab countries against the Israeli state that they wanted to annihilate previously would be a good thing.”  Well, I guess it’s considered a good thing unless it’s President Trump who is making it happen.  It’s in that situation that it becomes something not to be lauded, but instead to be seen as being nothing more than some sort of political ploy or “distraction.”  These Democrat scumbags make me want to puke.

So apparently, if I have this right, it’s in Williams’ world that any attempt at peace actually ends up being a recipe for war?  Now, I’m quite sure that had it been his bro ‘BO’ who had masterminded this latest peace deal I have no doubt that old Juan would be singing its praises from the rooftops.  But since it came about on President Trump’s watch it must be shunned most strenuously.  Only in the mind of someone like Williams is a peace deal, a bad deal, unless, of course, it involve pallets of unmarked bills, then it’s an act of pure genius.  Just ask John Kerry-Heinz, or ‘BO’.  

President Trump used the same strategy that he used with Canada in the USMCA deal. He looked around. Found willing partners (Mexico), made the deal which forced Canada to come to the table.  In this case, President Trump is brokering relationships with all the nations around Israel and the PLO.  Eventually the PLO and all of their terror groups will have to come to the table. They will be out of allies.  The strategy is fresh, logical, and bold. It demonstrates President Trump’s ability to see the larger picture, which is something that very few, if any Democrats, are ever able to do.

The supposed foreign policy ‘experts’ should have thought of this years ago.  But they are far too limited and petty to have recognized that a different strategy was called for.  So of course, we have yet another reason for ‘The Establishment’ to hate President Trump. The outsider was able to come up with a strategy that seems to have evaded the experts, so therefore the president must be hated for achieving yet another success.  And it’s one of their more reliable water-carriers, Williams, who will volunteer to throw the bucket at the deal, a pathetically transparent move.

Maybe for once if Williams had actually listened to the speeches after the signing ceremony he would have learned what this was truly all about.  I believe it was the Bahrain signee who stated that Israel and the PLO still had to come to a deal on how to live together as two separate states. Williams might also have noted that all of the signing states have been supporting the PLO with dollars throughout the years and that this one signing might just might urge the PLO to actually sit down and negotiate in a TRUE sense of the word not just lob rockets and verbs at the Israelis.

He likely does little more than read from a teleprompter and has no idea what he’s saying.  Five Arab nations have just stated the main issue is not the Palestinians anymore and many more are going to follow by signing accords.  President Trump got this deal by sidelining the Palestinians. They are the drunk uncle stumbling about wrecking a wedding party. Not a single thing they have done in the past fifty years shows a desire for peace, certainly no ability to govern themselves.  Now they are on the outside looking in, maybe they will get serious about this peace/prosperity thing.

Williams provides us all with what would be a whole new meaning to the term, ‘useful idiot.’  He rarely has any idea what it is that he may be taking about, and even less so when it’s regarding events the Middle East.  Basically all nations coming together and finding an alliance with Israel will help isolate the extremist regime of Iran.  Iran will then have to think twice before starting wars with their neighbors by default. Nothing has ever been achieved like this before between nation states like these. It bodes well for a new direction and possibly further possibility for peace in the region.

Williams is delusional and really doesn’t possess anywhere near the necessary intelligence to be on any network.  What an idiotic way of looking at what’s now going on in the Middle East. Peace is about to become a reality for so many people in that region of the world and he’s portraying the action as an accelerant to war?  He does not know how to say anything positive about this administration. The other participants on ‘The Five’ at least attempt to point out the good and bad of both sides of politics. I seldom watch because I can longer stand to watch this boob.

Establishment types are upset that President Trump doesn’t accept the premise that the central defining requirement for Middle East peace has to be satisfying the ‘Palestinians.’ The Palestinians are not the most important issue for these countries and have been used by the Arabs as a asymmetric weapon-proxy to attack Israel after failed conventional wars.  Now they realize the greatest threat to their countries are the Islamists whose obsession is the destruction of Israel and theocratic domination at the expense of the economic and political modernization of the Arab world.

Democrats and ‘The Establishment’ types want to empower Iran, and therefore are not in favor of having an Israel that is at peace with the Arab world. Their preference, of course, is to have an Israel that is constantly under siege by the Arab world, and Iran, as well as being constantly harassed by the ‘Palestinians.’ They want to have the same anarchy taking place in the Middle East that they are trying to create here.  But is just so happens that President Trump is busy blowing up all of their plans and in so doing is providing them with the incentive to make sure he is defeated by any means!

DOES ANYONE REALLY GIVE A SQUAT ABOUT CARL BERNSTEIN???

So it would seem that that dynamic duo, whose ONLY claim to fame is still that which was the turning of a third rate burglary into some sort of a national scandal more than 45 years ago, may again be working to bring about a sequel, of sorts, as they busily go about making yet another attempt to relive their long ago glory days.  It’s one half of the imbecilic team of Woodward and Bernstein who has again proven that he’s as much of a fraud as the other half of this hapless duo.  Bernstein recently accused President Trump of being “homicidal” for holding indoor campaign rallies during the coronavirus pandemic, on Monday’s broadcast of CNN’s “Anderson Cooper 360.”

It was then Cooper who started things off by saying, “You hear the president’s comments to Woodward and see the June indoor rally in Tulsa and Henderson and roundtable in Phoenix — it looks like an indoor rally. He’s knowingly putting people’s lives at stake.”  To which the loony Mr. Bernstein responded, “Let’s be clear what we are looking at here, we are witnessing a homicidal president convening purposely with a homicidal assembly to help him get re-elected as president of the United States, instead of protecting the health and welfare of the United States, including supporters whose lives he’s willing to sacrifice.”  What an idiotic thing to claim. 

And from there Bernstein then went on to say, “Here is this president, who staked part of his presidency on the right to life, particularly of the unborn, and every day he’s sacrificed the lives of thousands of Americans because he is unwilling to deal honestly, forthrightly meaningfully with the greatest domestic crisis in our post-war history in this country. He’s abdicated responsibility, and the result is the most grievous felony committed by any president in history, probably. And now we see him in front of us tonight, this homicidal assembly that the president of the United States called supporters to be sacrificial lambs. It’s astonishing.”  Yup, simply astonishing!

It’s rather interesting, I think, that back then, a burglary to discover the other side's campaign plans was seen as such an outrage.  And yet today we have Hitlery selling our uranium, operating her unprotected server, her deleted emails, and yet she’s still able to run around free as if none of these things ever occurred.  We also have ‘Creepy Joe’ Biden’s family enriching themselves with no experience in any of their chosen arenas, plus four years of investigation and impeachment of our duly elected President for no other reason than because those in the opposition party refuse to accept an election result.  Yes, the times have changed, and rather dramatically so.

And I must say that judging by what I’ve seen of Bernstein’s more recent work, as well as that of Woodward, it really does cause me to call into question much of what these two reported on back during those supposed dark days of Watergate, right down to the eventual outcome.  I mean we see a level of fiction that continues to be created by these supposed ‘journalists’ in what appears to be an effort to take down yet another Republican president, so how much of what we were told back then was, like much of we’re being told today by these very same men, was simply concocted?  So what was it that was the true scandal that actually occurred back in 1972?   

And it’s interesting how so many on the left continue to make all Trump-supporters into sacrificial lambs, useful idiots, deplorable and irredeemable.  As their demonization continues to escalate how much longer before they simply proclaim all those who dare to disagree with them as being fair game, to be taken out at the earliest possible opportunity and by any means necessary?  The rate at which things seem to be coming apart at the seams, with much encouragement now coming from one of our two primary political parties, how much longer before open season is declared on those of who dare to openly admit that they support our president?     

And so, comparatively speaking, it would seem that Trump Derangement Syndrome (TDS) is proving to be even more deadly than is the wimpy ‘Chinese virus.’  And call me naïve if you wish, but I had no idea that there were so many crazies in both our entertainment business and our ‘news’ media until President Trump was elected.  And it’s together that both Bernstein, and his former cohort Woodward, are a couple of the biggest frauds that you will ever find anywhere on the planet.  Old Carl complains of “lives at risk,” at President Trump’s rallies, yet how many insurgent gatherings had no masks and declared violence to be their right, with law breaking en masse?

Free will is that sneaking suspicion you have that this entire “scamdemic” has been significantly overblown and lied about.  The lockdown was to be for “two weeks, to flatten the curve.”  It reminds me of the movie “The Money Pit,” and how every time Tom Hanks asked a contractor how long the project was going to take, they responded “two weeks,” and then started laughing hysterically.  The Democrats are all so concerned about President Trump’s rallies and yet seem totally unconcerned when it comes to all of the rioting currently taking place all across the country.  So once again the blatant hypocrisy of the left is right there for all to very plainly see.    

Personally, regarding President Trump's rallies, I feel people can go, or not go, as they themselves may decide.  They can wear masks, or not, or distance themselves from one another, or not, as well.  In other words, they are free people doing what free people choose to do, knowing the risks and not victims of a homicidal maniac. They are Americans of the type that made this country great once and who believe they can do it again.  It’s only leftists like Cooper and Bernstein who think that all people are compelled to do whatever it is that they are told to do by their ‘leaders.’ They are good little leftists, you know, and they will do whatever they are told too. 

Look, if these perpetuators of the leftwing narrative really did believe that President Trump was in any way placing at risk those supporters who attend his rallies, instead of complaining about it what they would likely be doing instead is to encourage far more people to attend, salivating over the prospects of just how many more of the president’s supporters might die of the virus and then taking of the opportunity to feature the gruesome deaths caused by the evil ‘Orange Man.’ These shills really do depend on the ignorant and gullible among us.  But what they’re doing seems to be the complete opposite, to try to prevent people from attending these rallies.

It’s anyone who votes ‘BLUE, that’s Homicidal!  Vote for ‘Creepy Joe’ and you’ll end up with the ‘Ho’ as your President, with guaranteed higher taxes, no gas, no oil, no fracking, government run health care, government funded abortions, all qualifying for a free education, but there being no jobs because all the businesses will be in bankruptcy because of all the regulations and taxes.  Socialism has never worked anywhere in the world, but Democrats are determined to force America to crumble. Vote ‘RED’ for your grandchildren, or you can tell them how you remember the good old days when the economy boomed and everyone owned a house and had a job.

It’s true that in the final stages of the affliction the heads of those individuals afflicted with TDS swell slowly while at the same time making a stretching noise similar to that of a balloon being slowly over-inflated until just before they explode with what tends to be an ear-splitting BOOM followed by the flinging about of the enclosed feces and rocks over what can be some tremendous distances.  And I feel quite confident in saying that should the president be successful in his attempt to get reelected the rate of infection, regarding TDS, will likely increase exponentially, with the chances of meaningful recovery diminishing at pretty much the very same rate.  

I think the question that we need to being asking ourselves should be, at what point can we move on with our lives and again accept the risks that we have faced every single day since the day of our birth. Unless we live in a bubble, we place ourselves at risk of contracting any contagious illness the moment we step outside or find ourselves around others. Why is it seen as being selfish when one is wanting to return to normalcy by once again making their own decisions and taking responsibility for one’s own life and safety.  We can no longer afford to listen to those who seek only to control us by trying to make us fearful of coming together in opposition to them.

DAN BLATHER, EVER THE LIAR, NEVER THE ‘JOURNALIST’…

Another moron who has spent decades pretending to be a ‘journalist’ before finally being busted as the fraud that we all knew he was, is none other than ex ‘CBS Evening News, anchor Dan Blather.  And yet, he’s still with us.  You see, it was during a recent appearance on MSDNC that Blather made the rather bold statement in saying the presidential election in November would show us just how many people were “dumb enough to believe” President Trump when he says he didn’t want to spread panic in the early days of the coronavirus pandemic.  Blather must be of the opinion that those people are far dumber than were all of those who were “dumb enough to believe” that what ‘BO’ was selling, back in 2008, actually was “Hope and Change.”

So anyway, it was during this particular interview that old Dan Blather said, “What this presidential election is about is whether the country’s going to move more in the direction of white supremacy or move more in the direction of a multiracial, constitutional republic based on the freedom and the democracy. That’s the proper frame, in which we now should put this election given what the president says, what he’s been doing — this long list of things. No sense going through the litany, but, you know, he knew in early February how serious the coronavirus was, but he repeatedly misled the American people. He said using an excuse and a lie, he didn’t want to spread panic.”  So Blather, a proven liar, is now calling the president a liar? Seriously?

And it was from there that he went on to say, “Well, throughout his entire presidency and particularly during this presidential re-election campaign, he’s been trying to get people panicked,” he continued. “Panicked about dangerous people moving into the suburban neighborhood, panic over immigration. He’s asking us to believe that when it came to the coronavirus, he just didn’t want to spread panic. Anybody who believes this will believe that rocks grow, and we’re going to find out how many people are dumb enough to believe that. I’d like to think that most people in the country recognize it for what it is, and that is an excuse, and it’s a lie, and it’s outrageous, and it’s very dangerous.”  What’s truly dangerous, are people like Dan Blather.

You know, I ‘almost’ feel a little sorry for this senile old fart.  Flailing about for something intelligent to say, and yet ALWAYS coming up empty.  But please do keep trying, Mr. Blather, because each new attempt is always more hilarious than the last one.  Blather is as pathetic today as he always been and he, and the many others like him are becoming quite boring.  Blather is nothing more than a sanctimonious prick, a member of a ‘special’ eastern sect of political/publishing intelligentsia whose inbreeding has led to all manner of ‘delusions of grandeur,’ resulting in projections of their own stupidity toward the more gullible members of our society.  And yet it’s people like him who never go away, ever. They seem to hang around forever.

How many times over the decades has this very same guy gone on television promising that it was from some very reliable source that he had the next big scoop, the purpose of which was to take down some corrupt or dishonest politician, and we had better believe him or else.  And how often did it turn out to be nothing but a work of fiction of which the supposed source had destroyed original copy after getting it to Blather.  And how often did any of his many concocted stories EVER have anything to do with anyone in the Democrat Party?  Let’s be honest, Blather is the biggest fake to have ever appeared on any nightly ‘news’ programing, and he has a long and ‘rather’ storied history of pulling these tabloid type stunts throughout his entire career.

Blather, a proven and shamed liar, labels another a liar? This is supposed to vindicate a known liar? This is where the Left attempts to define what and who the liars are. The Left is well known for nothing other than deceit. They will continue to lie, cheat, deceive, and cover their own butts. But to those who pay attention, Blather is still what he was proven to be years ago, a pathetic liar!  That anyone is willing to provide Blather a platform from which to spew his never-ending drivel illustrates all that is wrong with the American news media today. Why is the opinion of a disgraced former news anchor, who resigned after he presented forged documents as the basis for a hit piece against a major Republican, sought after by anyone anywhere in the media? 

As we all know, or should, it’s in those Democrat circles where Blather spends most of his time, that being a dedicated liar and fraud garners much prestige.  Democrats are most in awe of the liars who have been able to keep their game going for decades.  In a party whose ideology is 100 percent against the interests of the American people, yet who members must somehow manage to attain American votes every election cycle, the ability to lie convincingly is an important talent to possess.  And every time we hear how Democrats think those in leadership should behave and what choices they believe President Trump should have made, it should then become all the more clear how Democrats have no business being placed in positions of leadership.

It was those like Blather, including old school types like Koppel, Brokaw, Jennings, and a whole host of others, who laid the groundwork for the modern day ‘fake news’ media, although most tended to be a bit less obvious than those today.  But also in the old days we had Republican presidents who were far less likely, than is Donald Trump, to call them out.  You see it is President Trump who has virtually no qualms about calling them exactly what they are, “fake news.”  In fact, he is eager to do so.  And yet they have the gall to squeal like stuck pigs every time he does so.  Perhaps if they were to behave more like the ‘journalists’ they claim to be and not as ‘activists’ under the employ of the Democrat Party, the ‘fake news’ moniker wouldn’t stick.

BRET ‘NEVERTRUMPER’ BAIER, ANOTHER FAUX ‘JOURNALIST’…

Let me start by saying that I can’t stand anti-Trumper Brett Baier, I haven’t been able to for quite some time now.  But that said, he’s only one of the reasons that I stopped watching Fox News, except for one or two exceptions.  And with that said, President Trump handled the ‘Chinese Virus’ situation the best way for America. Just think, back in March, there was already hysteria.  You couldn’t find toilet paper, hand sanitizer or Chlorox wipes. Can you possibly imagine what would have happened had President Trump sounded the alarm in hysteria?  He is our leader, and as far as I’m concerned he handled the situation professionally and did a great job!

But apparently there’s now more than just a few folks who seem to disagree with my assessment of things, a few over there at ‘Fox News,’ Bret Baier being one,.  You see it was during a recent interview with President Trump’s campaign spokesman Tim Murtaugh, on Thursday, that Baier pushed back, and rather strenuously so, after Murtaugh made the argument that the president said “the same things” to the public about COVID-19 that he had said to ‘journalist’ Bob Woodward.  Apparently President Trump had told Woodward that for months he knowingly downplayed the threat COVID-19 posed during interviews for Woodward’s soon to be released new book.

Excerpts of these recordings, which the president must have consented to, from Woodward’s book “Rage” were obtained by CNN and published on Wednesday.  In the recordings, President Trump says that he “wanted to always play it down” and that he still likes “playing it down, because I don’t want to create a panic.”  And it was these tapes that Baier brought up with Murtaugh noting that people are “coming hard after the president for what he said to Bob Woodward and what he said on the record.” Murtaugh responded by said, “the things that are contained in there are the same things that President Trump was saying publicly,” but Baier strenuously disagreed!

Baier screeched, “That’s not true, Tim.  That’s not true.”  But Murtaugh proceeded to double down on his statement that, yes, the President Trump had in fact said the very same things publicly that he told Woodward in the tapes.  But Baier continued to press, saying, “When he said that the virus would go from 15 to zero and then it was magically going to wash away, that is not the same thing he’s telling Bob Woodward, that it’s a deadly virus over the air and it’s really serious and I like to downplay it.”  But desperate in the attempt to make his rather idiotic point, Baier insisted, “He was not saying the same things privately to Bob Woodward.”

Murtaugh then said, “it was public knowledge at the time” and that “it was discussed in coronavirus briefings.” He said that “everyone knew … it was transmitted through things like coughing and sneezing.”  Baier responded saying, “OK, but you just said that what he was saying privately and publicly was the same. It’s not.”  Murtaugh then brought up Anthony Fauci, saying that he “said it is the same.”  Murtaugh began to say, “Dr. Fauci said there was no … difference with what the president was discussing privately versus… ”  Baier interrupted, “With Fauci, not with Bob Woodward,” again calling Murtaugh out before moving on with the interview.

So we have ‘The Three Stooges’ of Fox News, Wallace, Cavuto and Baier now appearing to do all that they can to sound as if they’re on CNN or MSDNC instead of the network that still boasts of being both “Fair and Balanced,” but these days appears to be neither.  More and more Foxers are jumping into the ‘Dump Trump’ camp.  ‘Commie Chris’ Wallace is nothing but Liberal in Conservative clothing hiding out at Fox and is an even bigger idiot than his old man was.  Cavuto has been a NeverTrumper from day one and then there’s Baier, who has no love loss for President Trump.  Fortunately, they got rid of that pillow-biter, Sheepherder Smith.

The Woodward tape took place on February 7.  On January 31, President Trump put a hold on travel from Communist China.  At the time Democrats, and numerous other fake news media types like Baier, were calling President Trump xenophobic.  Democrats and the ‘fake news’ media were saying the exact opposite of what Trump was saying. Then Democrats and the media made a dramatic turn in their narrative.  It seems no matter what President Trump says or does is going to be mispresented by those in the ‘fake news’ media.  Baier lost me as a long time ago. I don’t watch him anymore. I don’t watch any of primetime news because they push propaganda.

Baier was likely smarting after his recent go round with ‘Creepy Joe’ Biden’s communication guy during which he called Baier a ‘Trump supporter.’  So like any ‘real’ journalist Baier had to make clear to anyone who may be watching that isn’t a Trump supporter by then going out of his way to prove he isn’t, so he can think of himself as being “fair and balanced.”  And in so doing he made it all about him and not about getting true information before the public, but about perpetuating the lies of the left.  I once liked Baier but now that he seems to have gone to the dark side, not so much.  It seems that fair and balanced is a myth from this Fox mouthpiece.

And I could be wrong, I am, after all, getting older and the memory is the first thing to go, but I swear that I watched President Trump respond to the press who were saying that President Trump was in essence painting a rosy picture, and he said at the time (March) that he didn’t want the country to panic, and that he’s a ‘cheerleader’ for the country. How is Baier now saying that’s not true?  It’s on video!  And as I mentioned earlier this comes a day after ‘Creepy Joe’s spokesmoron refused to answer Baier’s question about whether Creepy Joe’ uses a teleprompter, and accusing the Trump campaign of using Baier to ask questions. And Baier just let it slide.

Fox News no longer serves as being a viable conservative alternative to the 99 percent of the remaining sources of so-called ‘news and information.’  Especially during their daytime and weekend lineups.  They seem to busy trying to please those on the left and it’s that effort that will, in the end, likely cost them more viewers.  They never should have covered the fake story published in ‘The Atlantic,’ the same story that the publications editor, Jeffery Goldberg, is now admitting was probably false.  But once again in their rush to tarnish this president as we head into the next election we have another supposed ‘news’ organization spreading nothing but lies.

When the President banned travel from Communist China in late January and from Europe in early February despite accusations of xenophobia, and set-up a COVID-19 task force, I knew the virus was serious, I didn't need the President to tell me that. Baier implied President Trump's efforts to downplay the virus were to deceive the American people, not keep them calm, despite the fact his comments to Woodward contradict that implication. Baier also failed to mention the number of deaths that occurred because of the overreaction to a virus with a 6% death rate, which is why the President chose not to jump up and down the way Democrats and the media did.

It seems that these days Baier is using pretty much the same interviewing technique as that used by ‘Commie Chris’ Wallace.  You know, where one saves his more aggressive and argumentative questioning for those who are either conservative or who support the president.  After all, Baier kept shutting down Murtaugh but allowed the jackass who is the communications guy for ‘Creepy Joe’ to walk all over him. Pretty pathetic.  Baier brings new meaning to the word ‘quibble’ as he tried to pull off a gotcha.  Baier seems to think that he’s actually a journalist when, in fact, he’s JUST a script reader provided by a corporate board influenced by advertisers.