BURN IN HELL, RUTHIE!!!

It’s not important when Ruth Bader Ginsburg died, all that’s truly important is that she’s finally dead.  If for no other reason than because of how many millions of unborn babies have been butchered because of this evil old bitch.  She’s another who died the death that she spent a lifetime earning.  When on the court it was not the proper interpretation of the Constitution that was her primary concern, it was how best to bastardize it.  She needs to be replaced with someone who IS able to interpret the Constitution as written and not read into it garbage that was never there.  

And so the Supreme Court announced this past Friday evening that Ruthie, the high court’s most senior liberal justice, had apparently died due to complications from metastatic pancreatic cancer at the ripe old age of 87-years-old.  And it was according to National Public Radio, (NPR) that days before her passing, Ginsburg dictated the following statement to her granddaughter, Clara Spera: “My most fervent wish is that I will not be replaced until a new president is installed.”  And that alone really does tell us all that we really need to know about this disgusting old hag.  

Ruthie had been on the court since 1993, appointed by then president ‘Slick Willy’ Clinton. Only Justice Clarence Thomas had served longer among the current members of the court.  In August, President Trump made the pledge to fill a Supreme Court vacancy if one were to open up in 2020, despite it being an election year.  President Trump said during an interview with radio host Hugh Hewitt, who asked him about the Supreme Court, “Absolutely, I’d do it.”  He now needs to follow through with that pledge, and the spineless Mitch McConnell needs to make the confirmation happen!

And let’s be honest here, one doesn’t just suddenly die of Metastatic Pancreatic cancer, it simply doesn’t happen.  She’s likely been in Hospice care for at least a few months, refusing to resign and thus provide enough time for President Trump to nominate a successor. This is NOT the behavior of an impartial jurist, this is the behavior of a pathetic, and very partisan, hack in a black robe.  She was the most divisive activist judge in the history of the court, and THAT is hard to do. She was a partisan politician to the very end living in their politics like it was a religion.

And despite the fact that there will likely not enough Republican votes in the Senate to get it done, because of pathetic RINOs like Romney, Murkowski, Collins, and likely even Graham who will al vote against it, that does not mean that the attempt should not be made.  And, of course, the excuse that will be made is that we need to wait for the election.  But I think we all know that if the Democrats held the Senate in a similar situation that they would move forward.  The country is at stake and the time has come for us to start playing the game the same way that the opposition does.

Look, we ALL know what would happen if the Democrats were in control and Chuckie Schumer were in Mitch McConnell’s place.  Their replacement justice would be confirmed within a week.  Steamrolled through an abbreviated confirmation process and confirmed in record time, in fact.  But instead, we will now see them make all manner of threats and do all that they can to obstruct the orderly process that every prior administration has been given in the exact set of circumstances.  Democrats continue to make clear that they don’t care about Americans, only about power.

And we all know that Ruthie made no bones about her refusal to retire until after the election in order to prevent handing to President Trump another opportunity to appoint yet another Supreme Court Justice.  She was essentially little more than an invalid but refused to do the right thing because of her politics.  And frankly it’s for that very reason that President Trump should not stand on ceremony or give her a period of mourning before replacing her.  He will just be getting the opportunity that he was supposed to have some time ago if she had bothered to honor her oath!

So what was Ruthie really like?  Well if we were to look back during her confirmation hearing we would hear Senator Orrin Hatch ask her a questions regarding the hiring of minority clerks and posed the question that if one had hired no minority clerks in one’s entire career should that actually disqualify one for a federal judgeship?  And, of course, Ruthie said that it should.  Senator Hatch then pointed out the fact that, as a Federal judge, Ruthie had made 23 law clerk appointments and all of them, every single one, had been white males.  Just one of those things that make you go hmmm.

Ruthie was nothing if not a hardcore liberal of the very worst kind, and as such she was a selfish egomaniac by definition.  She never really cared about the Constitution or even the future of the Supreme Court.  She only cared about her own power, and in being able to assist in advancing the cause of bringing down the country.  That’s why she refused to retire and allow ‘BO’ to replace her.  Thank God she was such a stubborn power-monger, because now it’s President Trump who will get the opportunity to replace her.  What a very happy ending to the ballad of Ruthie.

And you know, whether the claim of her ‘dying wish’ is accurate or not it only serves to demonstrate just how power-hungry these liberals truly are and how desperate the they are to both obtain, and then to retain, power for as long as they can.  You really have to be a Godless person to worry about maintaining the power you possess as your life in this world is about to expire and the instant you meet your maker and Judge is about to occur.  These people are evil to their core.  Ruthie was sinister and her contempt for the unborn was sickening.  The world is a better place without her.

I guess my only concern is that working to replace her will take a lot energy and could, very possible, end up diverting attention away from stopping the election fraud that we know is coming. It’s going to be a fulltime job for President Trump and the Republicans for the next month and a half.  So we may win the battle but lose the war.  If they win the presidency Democrats will provide amnesty to the millions here illegally.  If they also win the Senate and hold the House they won’t let the Supreme Court stop them and completely take over the country one way or another.

OOPS, TURNS OUT THE OLD GIRL AIN’T DEAD AFTER ALL…BUMMER!!!

When I was in the Navy we used to have this little saying: “One ah shit, wipes out a thousand atta boys!”  But I’m not sure if it’s applicable regarding the little incident that occurred this morning on Fox when Fox & Friends briefly aired a graphic which erroneously suggested that Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg had finally moved on to the great beyond.  But I am quite sure there were those watching who thought that it was long overdue and who also were more than a little disappointed to find out that it was nothing more than a cruel joke stemming from a graphics error. 

While I did not witness the incident myself, apparently it was upon returning from a commercial break that a graphic of the 85-year-old justice briefly came onscreen with the dates “1933-2019,” before a teaser of co-host Ainsley ‘Airhead’ Earhardt’s upcoming interview about college culture appeared.  It was later in the show that co-host Steve Doocy said, “We need to apologize … A technical error in the control room triggered a graphic of RBG with a date on it.”  And he added, “We don’t want to make it seem anything other than that was a mistake. That was an accident.”

Ginsburg, long the liberal face of the Court, is ‘said’ to be recovering from a December 21 procedure to remove malignant nodules from her lung. The cancerous growths were discovered while receiving treatment for a November 7 fall in her chambers. Ginsburg missed the Court’s oral arguments for three consecutive days earlier this month, participating in cases using transcripts — a first in the justice’s 25-year tenure on the bench. Ginsburg missed oral arguments last week as well and has also pulled out of two upcoming speaking engagements in recent days.

Appointed by ‘Slick Willy’ Clinton back in 1993, it was on several occasions that Ginsburg sternly rebuked calls for her to leave the bench during ex-resident Barry O’s second term, when a confirmation process appeared much less volatile due to a Democrat-controlled Senate.  Last year, the justice signaled that she intends to stay on the Court by hiring law clerks for at least two additional terms.  In a December interview published by the Communist News Network (CNN), Ginsburg affirmed her commitment to remain a justice “as long as I can do it full steam.”

Now personally, I would argue that old Ruthie passed away a long time ago, and it’s only through the miracle of industrial grade formaldehyde that she still ‘appears’ to be with us today.  And regarding this error, perhaps we should do what the left always does whenever they make a mistake, that being to double down.  Declare that Ruthie is, in fact, dead and if we don't see proof of life in the next 48 hours then it must be true. It just might be the biggest scandal ever to hit the Democrat Party, especially if Pelosi ‘knew’ all along she was dead and has worked to keep it hidden from us.

And this latest attempt by Hollyweird, not withstanding, to portray her as being some sort of saint, it’s neither dignity nor respect are that can in any way be applied to someone who has shown herself, and on more than one occasion, to be someone who most certainly does not believe in our Constitution.  And this movie, ‘On The Basis Of Sex’, is really nothing more than a fictionalized account of the life of one who can very easily be described as an icon to the progressive left in this country.  She is the poster child for leftist ‘judges’ who pose such a grave threat to our freedom.  

Let’s be honest, old Ruthie has long been little more than a progressive hack in a black robe.  She’s essentially nothing more than a political operative, a shill for the Democrat Party and stands not for the rule of law and neither does she stand on the side of the American people and our Constitution.  She has made it abundantly clear that she supports an increasingly leftist Democrat agenda, and I will most certainly celebrate the day when she finally does leave this earth. And I have no doubt where it is that she will likely end up upon her departure.  It’s where all of her ilk end up!

And remember it was Ginsburg herself who has said she would retire when she could no longer perform her duties to an adequate standard.  And now having essentially gone missing in action I’d say that criteria has now officially been met.  And how much longer is it that we can expect her to fill what has become an increasingly important position without actually having to show up for work?  Imagine if she was a conservative and a Democrat was in the White House, calls would have already begun for her to vacate her seat on the bench so that a replacement could be named.

Imagine the massive leftwing head explosion when old Ruthie finally does leave the planet!  One thing is for certain, it ain’t gonna be a pretty sight. Without proof that she is not dead and just holed up somewhere, I think President Trump should present a list of those he is now considering for his next nomination to the Court. Otherwise the Democrats may very well try to play this charade through 2019 and then scream no pick can be made in an election year.  Many are speculating Ruthie is already dead with the ‘Deep State’ doing everything that it can to delay the announcement.

Whatever we get from the ‘fake news’ media is likely a lie. I don’t know the truth, but I do suspect that we’re not getting it. When an 85 year old falls it generally means it’s the beginning of the end. Next we will hear she is in training to run a marathon and Democrats will swear to it. Justice Scalia dies and doesn't even get an autopsy and we can't even get any proof that the old girl is still alive.  There is something very strange going on here.  But it is logical to assume that if she had died the left would do all that it could to cover it up for as long as was humanly possible.

RUTH ‘BUZZY’ GINSBURG, “SEXISM IS WHY HITLERY LOST.”

Democrats/Liberals/progressives/socialists, or whatever moniker they wish to go by these days, it’s those on the left who really do live in what can only be described as being a constant state of denial.  Because it’s whenever they lose any sort of contest that it must always be because either someone cheated or those responsible for electing, or selecting, the winner were somehow biased against them.  It can never be because they were a poor candidate or a contestant lacking the necessary talent to actually win.  Such is the case with Hitlery, who over the course of the last 10 months has blamed everyone, and everything, imaginable for losing a contest that nearly all but her opponent thought that she had in the bag.  Everyone but herself, that is.

And it has been 99 percent of those involved in the state-controlled media who have been doing their best to bolster her claims that she was somehow robbed of her much deserved victory by Donald Trump.  Because there is simply no way that he could have possibly won without cheating.  And now joining in the blame-everything-but-Hitlery-game is none other than Supreme Court Justice ‘Ruth Buzzy’ Ginsburg, who believes sexism is what really put President Trump in the White House.  It was when asked by the Communist Broadcasting System’s (CBS) Charlie Rose in an interview conducted earlier this week that she said, “I have no doubt that it did.”  Old ‘Buzzy’ went on to add that sexism “was a major, major factor” in Hitlery’s devastating loss last year. 

Now for those able to remember, old ‘Buzzy’ made no such comments back in 2008 when it was Obummer who handily defeated Hitlery, ruining her historic moment of becoming the first female U.S. president.  But then, perhaps that has much more to do with ‘Buzzy’s’ personal feelings toward President Trump.  After all, she was one of the harsher critics of then candidate Trump, going so far as to once tell The New York Times that she couldn’t imagine him as president and the negative affects he would have on the country.  ‘Buzzy’ said it would only be four years for the country but for the Supreme Court, “It could be — I don’t even want to contemplate that.”  Now she has since apologized for those comments, so that makes it alright. 

The Democrats remind me of an old soap opera. They use the same plot in every show and continue to get away with their bad acting.  Can you imagine the Democrats if they were unable to use the ‘blame game?’  If they weren't protected by the state-controlled media and were instead made to abide by the same rules they impose on everyone else?  Can you imagine the Democrats if they always had to make very clear what it is that they truly do stand for?  Imagine if the Democrats we held accountable to the same regulations that they impose upon their enemies, we the American people. They’d never win another election.  They continue to thrive only because their supporters are comprised of some of the most ignorant people on the planet.

And when it comes to old ‘Buzzy’, she’s the type of individual that Liberal Democrats and RINO Republicans love to first nominate and then expend every effort to get them quickly confirmed.  And they do this because they know these people are far less interested in determining the constitutionality of any law than they are in dreaming up new ways to ‘interpret’ what the Constitution says.  It’s called judicial activism.  Old ‘Buzzy’ has proven time and time again that she has no business being a Supreme Court Justice.  Her opinions as a Justice are extreme.  At least she was truthful when saying many women voted for Hitlery because Hitlery said vote for me if you are a woman because I am a woman.  If that doesn’t define ‘sexism’, what does?

Let’s face it, had Hitlery not been a woman, she would have never received her party’s nomination in the first place.  And she lost the election not because Trump cheated, but because people saw how she had received preferential treatment and was let off the hook for the minimum of 58 felonies that she committed, but wasn't prosecuted for, not to mention her ‘Pay to play’ with the Clinton foundation.  I mean, how else does someone who's ‘serving’ our nation end up with $200 Million, plus, fortune on a $186,000 a year salary?  Or was it her consistently horrible performance first as a U.S. Senator and then as Secretary of State, her extreme progressive views, specifically in relation to the promises she made regarding the Supreme Court?

Far from deserving to be in the White House, or allowed to remain free to go across the country on a book tour where she charges folks $300 a pop just to sign her book, Hitlery should instead be serving a life sentence in Leavenworth.  ‘Buzzy’ yet again shows her own bias in failing to see that Hitlery's behavior has been abhorrent and is what resulted in many voters coming to see her as being profoundly untrustworthy and therefore not worthy of their vote.  That’s why she lost.  And yet Ginsburg can blame, and with what I can only guess is her version of a straight face, Hitlery’s defeat on ‘sexism.’  Which says much more about her mind than it does about any actual events or circumstances surrounding our most recent presidential election. 

Look, we all know that Obummer won the presidency with more than 95% of blacks voting for him instead of the white guys, McCain or Romney, then men who ran against him.  So could we possibly expect to hear from old ‘Buzzy’ how it was that the only reason Obummer was able to win either election was because of racism?  Somehow I doubt it.  And you know, since when does simply by virtue of you being a female, erase the fact that you are nothing more than a cheating, lying, criminal politician and grifter?  Hitlery was rejected because everyone who possess a vagina failed to vote for her because she has a vagina.  Vaginas do not create anything notable concerning ones character.  And Hitlery is evidence of that fact.

But in a way, I guess you could say that old ‘Buzzy’ is correct when she says that sexism played a major role in our last election.  But that would only be because the Democrats were desperate in their attempt to elect a president based solely on the gender of their candidate and not on any specific qualifications that she can be said to have possessed.  And they promoted the kind of agenda that women able to think for themselves, and who didn't want to vote for Hitlery, would never support.  And then Democrats said those women were stupid and unintelligent.  Yup, that's sexism alright.   Good thing many women didn't buy into that crap and helped to elect a real president, one who represents all of us not just one of the many ‘victim’ groups.