MORE OF THE ‘GASBAG’ CHRONICLES, WITH STENY HOYER…

As I have said before, one man’s border crisis is another man’s voter drive, which is why Democrats deny that we have a crisis at our southern border.  And to say that I am extremely disappointed that the president chose to sign this disastrous budget bill that does nothing to secure our border is an understatement.  What he should have done was to break it off in the ass of the Democrats and the RINOs who crafted it.  And were it not for our gutless RINOs, this border problem would not exist today.  

But, back to the topic at hand.  It was during a ‘pen and pad briefing’ on Capitol Hill this past Wednesday that Steny ‘The Gasbag’ Hoyer told reporters “there is no crisis at the border,” and they repeatedly accuse the president of trying to somehow take advantage of a manufactured crisis.  Meanwhile, Democrats claim there is a true crisis because of ‘climate change,’ which, if we’re being honest, is the perfect example of what a ‘manufactured crisis’ looks like.  But that is a topic for another day.

At this same little get together Hoyer was discussing a weekend trip to the U.S.- Mexico border that he took along with four other House Democrats.  And according to Hoyer, following conversations with local residents and border personnel, he and the other representatives concluded “there is no crisis at the border.”  Hoyer emphasized they “encountered nobody in the community that was fearful” and that among the border agents they spoke with “nobody considered there to be a crisis at the border.”

Although Hoyer acknowledged that there were challenges at the border, he cited Director of National Intelligence Daniel Coats, whose list of crisis points threatening the United States “did not mention the Southwest border.”  Hoyer advocated for greater investment in technology, personnel, and infrastructure as a path to stronger border security. He also called for “substantial sums to assist the triangle countries – Honduras, Guatemala and El Salvador.”  Yup, let’s just throw more money at it!

He said, “Clearly, the way you really stop refugee problems is to make sure people are safe in their homes.”  Now what the Hell is that supposed to mean?  So by giving these countries more money people can be made to feel safe in their homes and won’t want to come here?  Does he really think we’re that stupid?  What we ought to do is turn the money spigot off completely, and dictate to these same countries that they either behave responsibly or there will be no hope of getting any money.

Later, in a response to a ‘reporter’s’ question about President Trump declaring a national emergency to acquire greater border wall funding, Hoyer argued that the situation lacked the gravity necessary to legally justify such a move.  Hoyer said, “There may be a challenge, there may be people coming across we don’t know about, but it’s not a horde, it’s not an attack, it’s not an invasion.”   I disagree, it IS a horde, it IS an attack and it IS an all-out invasion that must be stopped and stopped NOW!

It goes without saying that Hoyer’s assessment of our border situation differs rather significantly from that of President Trump and his supporters.  And there’s a reason for that, it’s all part of the Democrat plan.  During his State of the Union address, President Trump described the situation on America’s southern border as an “urgent national crisis.”  He warned that “the lawless state of our southern border is a threat to the safety, security, and financial wellbeing of all America.”  And he was right!     

Now of course, if, like Hoyer, you visit a section of the border that’s been secured it would appear as if there is no border problem.  But then, he’s not going to go to where the real problems are.  Nor will he go and talk with the people who live where there is no wall to see what some of these residents living along the border have to put up with.  In other words, he won’t do his job!  But that’s never going to happen, Democrats know what it’s like and they know the president is telling the truth.

Ex-president Barry ‘O’ called the border situation a crisis even back in 2014, yet we had no one describing it then as being a “manufactured crisis.” It really is insulting to the many who have been impacted by inaction and, now, indifference.  Hoyer is a liar who is far more interested in the politics of the issue than he is in ensuring proper measures are taken to keep Americans safe.  May Hoyer go straight to Hell, not pass go and collect nothing but scorn and disdain as he travels straight to Hell!

Look, this is nothing more than a lame attempt to stymie the president now that he has decided to call a state of emergency.  Thousands cross our southern border every single day.  If that’s not the definition of an invasion then I don’t know what is.  And for Democrats to not see it as such makes very clear, or should, their reckless disregard for the safety of the American people.  Democrats have no problem with sacrificing the lives of Americans in their quest for power, however many it may take.

That President Trump was left with no other option than that of declaring a national emergency makes very clear that many of those whom we continue to elect to Congress, regardless of party, remain uninterested in securing our borders.  And if we the people do not become more assertive in what has now become a very adversarial relationship, with those political hacks on one side and the president and the American people together on the other, our nation’s survival is very much in doubt.

SO WHEN IS A HATE-CRIME, NOT REALLY A HATE-CRIME, OR EVEN A CRIME AT ALL???

Apparently I am far from being the only one who’s proving to be a bit skeptical regarding the alleged attack on a black, gay actor in Chicago, aka “MAGA country.”   And after providing zero proof that this alleged attack actually took place, actor Jussie (Juicy) Smollett said in a recent interview that he is very angry at people who don’t “want to see the truth” about an alleged racially motivated attack that he claims to have been a victim of.  Frankly I’ve lost count of the number of these supposed ‘hate crimes’ that typically result in all manner of kneejerk reactions with us only to find out later that the alleged attack never actually occurred.

And so, it was during an interview on Good morning America, that Juicy told host Robin Roberts, “I’m pissed off…It’s the attackers, but it’s also the attacks.”  Juicy continued, “It’s like, you know, at first it was a thing of like, listen, if I tell the truth then, that’s it, because it’s the truth. Then it became a thing of, like, oh, how can you doubt that?”  He said, “Like, how can you not believe that? It’s the truth. Then it became a thing of, like, oh, it’s not necessarily that you don’t believe that this is the truth. You don’t even want to see the truth.”  And to add just that right touch of realism, Juicy actually shed a tear (acting?) at one point during the interview.

You’ll remember that Juicy made national headlines last month for claiming he was attacked by two individuals in downtown Chicago at around 2 am.  He claimed that his attackers threw a chemical on him, put a rope around his neck, beat him, and hurled racial and homophobic slurs while yelling, “This is MAGA country!”  Chicago police have since reviewed hundreds of hours of video and still have not found any possible suspects in the alleged attack.  And in a statement this week, a spokesman for the Chicago Police Dept. said that phone records from Juicy, “do not meet the burden for a criminal investigation as they were limited and heavily redacted.”

What we very likely have here is yet another outrageous claim backed up by absolutely nothing, made by an actor on a failing show, who's made statements about his hate for the people who conveniently just happened to be the ones to ‘attack’ him.  And in a city with tens of thousands of cameras, none have anyone anywhere near this actor at any time.  How could anyone NOT believe poor old Juicy?  And if Juicy did get attacked (and that is still a really big IF) then all of evidence at least up to this point would seem to indicate this was nothing more than another example of black on black crime committed on the crime-ridden streets of Chicago.

There’s an old adage that’s a favorite of many in the world of entertainment.  It’s the one that says any publicity is good publicity.  And so I wouldn’t really be all that surprised to find out that the motive behind this alleged attack was to try to kill two birds with one stone.  That being to take yet another gratuitous swipe at President Trump and his supporters while at the same time gaining a little publicity for both himself and his TV show that, or so I’ve heard, is languishing in the ratings department. And who would even say, “this is MAGA country,” that is so ridiculous.  There is nothing about this alleged ‘attack’ that has the ring truth about it.

It’s a well-known fact that 99% of the time 100% of Democrats lie.  They’re the ones who protest, destroy, create havoc, burn and loot private property, in other words, the same thing they do when in public office. These same protesters have never worked an honest job a day in their lives. Democrats make up lies and when caught, deny, deny, deny. Democrats think its fine to say anything and never have to prove any of it.  They think they can just make shit up and when we call them on it, or refuse to believe them, they get “pissed off.”  Well Juicy, go right ahead a get pissed off because until I see some actual proof, I won’t be buying your story.

I’m not saying he’s lying, I’m merely suggesting that the odds of two guys carrying bleach and a rope while walking in Chicago at 2 am in subzero temps while looking for an openly gay black man to beat up and intimidate is rare enough. But compound that with the odds of them running into an openly gay black man carrying a ‘Subway’ sandwich on the streets of Chicago at 2 am in subzero temps who they then beat up, pour bleach on before slipping a noose over his head, and who then miraculously manages to return home while still carrying his sandwich. Yeah, I see his point. It’s stunning that so very few people find his story to be even somewhat believable.

And as is always the case with lying punks, like old Juicy, he will never be held accountable, should this entire event prove to have been fabricated. There will always be enough people who want to believe and who are of the mind to create disruptions, riots, boycotts and whatever else it takes to keep the authorities from proceeding much further.  It gives them the appearance of ‘winning.’  But it also shows the general lack of respect these actors and ‘fake news’ programs have for the general public.  They think we’re stupid.  Intelligent people must remain able to see through these cheap tactics, and recognize what’s being attempted.

YES MS. HARRIS, OUR AMERICAN VALUES ‘ARE’ UNDER ATTACK…BY YOU!!!

So riddle me this.  Do Democrats ever bother to listen to what it is that they say, or do they simply possess such a low opinion of those to whom they are speaking that they don’t really care what they’re saying because we’re all too stupid to remember, and those in media aren’t going to spend any amount of time reminding us of what they said.  But you do have to wonder sometimes about the things these people say.

Case in point would be Kamala ‘Cruella de Vil’ Harris, Democrat, who recently said in a Tweet: “Our American values are under attack.  Babies are being ripped from their parents at the border. A tax bill passed that benefits corporations and the top 1% while millions of middle-class families struggle to pay the bills. We’re better than this.”  Now am I the only one who left scratching my head at such a comment?

I say that because Democrats think it's both horrible and un-American to separate illegal aliens from their children when caught sneaking across our border, and yet at the same time seem to think that it’s totally acceptable for a baby can be aborted anytime the mother wants, from conception to delivery.  Does she not see the irony here?  And if not, if she is totally oblivious, what exactly does that say about her?

Now if she had said, “American values are under attack as evidenced by the fact that babies are being ripped from their mother's womb,” then I would be in total agreement with her assessment of things. But her Tweet, as written, makes little sense, as parents who commit crimes are generally put in jail when convicted, thus separating them from their children. But then I'm talking about American children.

Now I do have a bit of friendly advice for those folks at the border who prefer not to be separated from their children.  All that would be for them to ‘Stop Trying To Break Into Our Country Illegally!  Because when you break our laws, the consequences of said lawbreaking is on YOU, not on the men and women of I.C.E., not on those who work for our Border Patrol, nor anyone else in the U.S., but totally on YOU!

What we see coming from Ms. Harris is an inexcusable transfer of blame from those committing illegal acts to those who are merely doing their job.  And it is this twist of reality that should make her unfit for holding any public office.  She is free to move to Mexico, since she cares more for illegal immigrants from that nation than she does for the safety, security, and prosperity of those she is supposed to be serving.

And it’s as a former prosecutor that she should know, children and adults are always separated after an arrest.  Democrats, such as herself have virtually no problem with murdering babies in the womb and now suggest we can even murder them after they’re born. Hardly a comparison.  Don't show us your false compassion because you really don't have any and you really don't care. They’re merely talking points to spew!

Yes, American values are under attack, not by our folks at the border, but by those like Kamala/Cruella determined as they are in their effort to murder innocent babies. The fact is, all of those coming to the border trying to enter illegally should not be putting their children in such a situation in the first place.  That there is now anyone being separated at the border is the fault of no one other than these ‘parents.’

We already had plenty of child separation occurring during the Barry ‘O’ reign with nary a word coming from Democrats nor the ‘fake news’ media.  But then, I suppose we shouldn’t be surprised.  Typical though is how she is so concerned about illegal immigrant minors being separated from their illegal immigrant parents but she doesn't give a squat about full term babies being murdered in the process of an abortion.

And finally, what do Democrats really know about American values?  Values such as patriotism, faith in God, hard work, honesty and self-reliance, to name just a few of those values that are so uniquely American and none of which are possessed by anyone who can call themselves a Democrat.  And yet the same Democrats who are always claiming to be the guardians of American values, believe in none of them.

It goes without saying that Democrats are not very patriotic and also tend to be little more than freeloaders, always eager to see how much they get for little or nothing in return.  And yet whenever you point that out to them they get all indignant, as if you’re telling them something that just isn’t true. And it’s people like these who vote for politicians like Ms. Harris, who are always more than willing to buy their votes.

THE “CLIMATE CHANGE” INSANITY INTENSIFIES WITH THE “GREEN NEW DEAL”…

It was just recently that we heard from Democrats about how the combating of supposed ‘climate change’ is the equivalent of fighting the Nazis in World War II or putting a man on the Moon.  Both of which I thought were peculiar analogies for combating something that the vast majority of Americans doubt even exists.  While those on the left continue to tout is as being ‘settled science’, that’s far from being the case.  The most recent ‘master plan’ for combating this manufactured crisis comes to us in the form of something called, ‘The Green New Deal.’  And Democrats apparently see ‘climate change’ as their best way to defeat President Trump.

And it was Democrat Chris Murphy who recently said that despite claims to the contrary, this green new deal resolution, which calls for meeting 100 percent of the power demand in the U.S. through clean, renewable and zero emission energy sources, is “absolutely realistic.”  He was recently interviewed there at ‘fake news’ headquarters, aka CNN, and it was faux journalist Jake Tapper who mentioned that Angus King, who is an ‘Independent from Maine who caucuses with Democrats, and Barry ‘O’s former Energy Secretary, Ernest Moniz, have said that they don’t think Murphy’s plan is very realistic.  But realistic or not, it’s seems to be gaining support.

And it was in taking offense at such remarks, Murphy said, “I think it's absolutely realistic, and I frankly think we need to set our sights high. I think there are a lot of people who said that it wasn't realistic for the United States to get a man on the moon by the end of the 1960s when President Kennedy initially outlined that goal, but we did it, and I think we have to set our sights high.”  He said, “I have a 10-year-old and 7-year-old. Global warming is an existential threat to the planet, and so if we don't command this country to think big about saving our nation and our world from destruction, then I don't think we're going to get close to meeting the mark.”

It was last Friday that Murphy, along with fellow Democrats ‘Lying Dick’ Blumenthal, Edward ‘Malarkey’ Markey and one of the newest members of Congress, the rather simplistic Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez introduced a bicameral resolution calling for a Green New Deal.  Murphy said in a statement on his website: “Climate change is the most pressing problem facing our generation.”  And he goes on to say, “It is already posing a security threat to our nation, and we are feeling its impacts in real time. We need bold ideas if we’re going to rise to meet this challenge.”  However, it’s obvious that one man’s “bold ideas” is another man’s silly idealistic crusade.

The Green New Deal Resolution lays out the goals and projects for a ten-year national mobilization to:

•Build resiliency against climate change-related disasters;

•Repair and upgrade U.S. infrastructure;

•Meet 100 percent of our power demand through clean, renewable, and zero-emission energy sources;

•Build or upgrade to energy-efficient, distributed and “smart” power grids;

•Upgrade all existing U.S. buildings and build new buildings, to achieve maximum energy efficiency;

•Spur massive growth in clean U.S. manufacturing and remove pollution and greenhouse gas emissions from manufacturing and industry;

•Work with farmers and ranchers to remove pollution and greenhouse gas emissions from the agriculture sector;

•Overhaul U.S. transportation systems;

•Remove greenhouse gases and reduce pollution, including by restoring our natural ecosystems through proven low-tech solutions;

•Restore and protect threatened, endangered, and fragile ecosystems;

•Clean up existing hazardous waste and abandoned sites;

•Make the United States the international leader on climate action and help other countries achieve a Green New Deal.

But things get even more bizarre the further that we dig into this boondoggle, because this ‘Green New Deal’ also “includes the goals of guaranteeing that all members of society can have a job with a family-sustaining wage and are provided with high-quality health care; affordable, safe, and adequate housing; economic security; and access to a clean environment.”  Of all the supposed gimmicks ever devised to combat this nonexistent threat, this ‘green new deal’ has to be the nuttiest proposal ever to be conceived.  Instead of taking this political nonsense seriously, anyone who admits to supporting it should be locked up in a padded room.

It was arguably one of the most embarrassing, yet revealing, political disclosures on the steps of the Capitol in quite some time.  Ms. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, declared by some to be a “rock star”, read from a prepared script that was badly in need of a major edit. The laundry list of goals outlined in the ‘Green New Deal’ (which she actually didn’t write) was so childish, so lacking in commonsense, it made clear to the world these new Democrats in Congress suffer from a rather shocking lack of both intelligence and perspective.   Was it really that bad?  Yes it was, and I wouldn’t be surprised to find out much of it was bought and paid for by our ‘friends’ in China.   

In a nut shell, this ‘Green New Deal’ will result in nothing more than the federal government taking control of all properties; whether farms, ranches, homes, office buildings; the use of all forms of transportation; air, train, auto, walking, bus; over every industry, what industries; over every product produced.  And in its crusade to conquer “climate change”, having covered every available plot of land with windmills and solar panels with the population facing world-wide starvation, the ruling elitists will have a change of heart. They will come to tell the masses that a new study reveals oil, gas, coal and nuclear were "clean and renewable" after all.  Who knew?

Something that Murphy and his many ‘climate change’ compatriots never speak of is the fact that well over 13,000 qualified American scientists have proclaimed, repeatedly, and been suppressed by both the media and politicians, that there is absolutely no scientific proof that there is any ‘climate change’ that can be traced to human activities. Furthermore, during the last 24 months we have one of the most significant cool downs of the global ‘mean’ temperature on record.  And despite the claim made by Al Gore that the polar ice caps would be devoid of all ice by 2010, here we are on 2019 with there now being more ice at the poles than ever before.

That this ‘climate change’ nonsense continues to be what the Democrats seem to have pinned their hopes on for defeating President Trump is something that I find, quite frankly, more than a little strange.  Also now we have ‘Con Man’ Cory Booker out there declaring that “this planet simply cannot sustain people eating meat.”   I can’t help but wonder who, but the most committed Democrats, takes any of this craziness seriously. Climate change continues to be a theory in search of any actual scientific proof of its existence.  Because any science used to support its existence has been up to this point highly suspect to say the least.  It’s a manufactured crisis. 

And when you stop and consider the fact that 99.9 percent of all those who profess to have some level of belief in what is really nothing more than a scam to redistribute wealth, are all on the left, shouldn’t that cause one to pause.  And the continuing insults and name-calling directed at those who remain unconvinced, or at least a bit skeptical, should also cause one to question the motivation of those behind the perpetuating of the yet to be proven theory of ‘climate change.’  And ask yourself, have you ever been as certain about anything in your life, as these people are about ‘climate change’?  I know I haven’t.   It’s a religion to some of these people.

HER HIGHNESS HITLERY: “THERE IS NO NATIONAL EMERGENCY AT THE BORDER!!”

When trying to determining if that which is now taking place at our southern border might actually qualify as a national emergency, who better to answer that question than Hitlery, that two time loser in the arena of presidential politics.  That said, it was just this past Sunday on something called, “The Circus”, which is broadcast on ‘Showtime’, that Hitlery made it quite clear that President Trump should not declare a national emergency to build a wall along the U.S.-Mexico border because she argued there is “no national emergency at our border.”  But as is so often the case with Democrats, one person’s national emergency is another person’s voter drive.  Because make no mistake, if we’re being honest here, that’s exactly what’s taking place.

Hitlery said, “I just don’t think you should call national emergencies unless there truly is a national emergency. There’s no national emergency at our border. And he’s frustrated because he can’t even get his own party to support his request. And he shouldn’t be breaking new ground and causing new precedents that really may come back to not only haunt him, but our country. He should go through regular order. He couldn’t get Congress when he had Republican control. He can’t get it now. Then work with Congress. Every Democrat, every Republican wants to do what is right to secure our border. They disagree with his demand that there is only one way to do that.”  I’m sure she sees no need, whatsoever, for any urgent action to be taken.

But if she doesn’t see what’s taking place at the borders as qualifying as a national emergency then I’d like to know what it is that might meet Hitlery’s criteria for doing so. Now keep in mind that Gallup says five million Latin Americans plan to migrate to the U.S. in the next 12 months, and an estimated 42 million more say they want to enter.  To my way of thinking, if that doesn't constitute a national emergency then I don't know what does.  Make no mistake, this is a wholesale invasion of our country, and it must be stopped by all available means.  Because if we fail, we will lose the country and follow in the footsteps of Europe, never to return.  But then, that’s exactly what the Democrats and they’re allies on the left would like to see happen.

Look, you don’t need to be a genius to be able to recognize that it’s the Left in this country that represents a bona fide national emergency!  The Left, of which Hitlery is most definitely a proud member, wants nothing less than to destroy America as we know it, and by any means necessary. And if this onslaught of illegal immigrants is not national emergency then may I ask, what the Hell is?  The Democrats need a new voting bloc, that’s clear. And the RINOs want to keep labor costs down, that’s also very clear. And it’s the behavior of both that should now be considered as being nothing short of treasonous. This is not why we elect these people, but then once they are safely sworn in it matters little why they were elected, only that they were.

For anyone not looking through the prism of politics it’s become painfully obvious that what we see going on at our southern border, and on a daily basis, has now become a national emergency.  We are a sovereign nation, and as such we have borders, and we should be able to keep outside those borders all except those who come with some skill or ability that allows them to contribute to making our country better.  Simply being willing to work for less than those who are born here, or those who come here legally, should not be viewed as a sufficient reason for entry.  Americans are required by our country to pay taxes, abide by the laws and in some cases to give up our children in protecting America. Our country owes us the ability to protect ourselves.

And does anyone doubt that if there was a snowball’s chance in Hell that even a fraction of those coming into this country illegally would be voting for Republicans as soon as they could get their grubby little hands on a ballot, that every single Democrat, Hitlery included, would be screaming at the top of their lungs about there being a national emergency on the southern border and about the need to build a wall as a high as one could be built.  But since that is not the case all we continue to hear from Democrats is about how it’s either immoral to want to build a wall or just plain racist.  Hence we end up where we are with President Trump being left with few options of getting done that which he promised us he would do, build ‘The Wall.’     

Unfortunately, Hitlery, like ex-president Barry, is still doing enormous damage to this nation even though she are no longer ‘officially employed’ in our government. Both are receiving financial support from anti-American, special interest groups and both are working against this nation.  She was selected to complete the destruction of this country that was begun by Barry.  Just be thankful that that didn’t happen. Hitlery needs to go back into the woods. She seems oblivious to the effects of illegal entry across our southern border.  Crime, drugs, people with communicable diseases, job displacement, demands on healthcare and infrastructure, schools, etc. This view by Hitlery is common among Democrats, ALL of whom want open, porous borders.

CHUCKIE SCHUMER PANICS OVER ‘CLIMATE CHANGE’…

It was in sounding like some soon-to-be-supporter of that cockamamie boondoggle called the ‘Green New Deal’, that none other than that very well-known climate scientist, Chuckie Schumer recently took to the floor of the U.S. Senate to deliver a speech the central point of which, of course, was to criticize President Trump for his State of the Union Address.  Chuckie’s bone of contention, among other things, was that the president failed to even mention the issue of “climate change,” which we all know is an issue that is very near and dear to the heart of EVERY Democrat.  

Chuckie said, “He talked about the future of America and didn’t even mention climate change.”  And added, “How could you do that? Chuckie claimed, “Every scientist who has studied it knows that in the next 10, 20, 30 or 40 years, climate change is going to evoke huge changes in our country and in our world.”  He went on to say, “If you believe in the future and you want to have a good future for our children and grandchildren, which we all do, you can’t ignore climate change.”  He said, “You may have different views on it, but you can’t ignore it,” he said.

Now let’s just say for the sake of argument that Chuckie and his fellow America-hating colleagues there in the Democrat Party are right in all of their claims about ‘Climate change’, ‘global warming’, ‘climate disruption’ or WHATEVER they wish to call it.  If both, the Arctic and Antarctic polar ice caps were to melt completely, and New York City, San Francisco, Seattle, Los Angeles and every other large Democrat-infested coastal metropolitan area were to become inundated with tsunami waves and flooding like we've never seen, would that necessarily be a bad thing? 

And another thing, it’s on one hand that Chuckie claims to be just oh so concerned about our children and grandchildren and yet the other hand he seems to have absolutely no problem whatsoever with allowing women the RIGHT to murder those very same children and grandchildren, even AFTER they have been born.  That, to me, is the worst kind of hypocrisy.  To the point I can’t help but wonder how is it that anyone bothers to even listen to this guy.  There is NOTHING true or real in ANYTHING that he says.  Everything, and I mean everything, he says has it purpose in politics. 

But let’s be real, I think it goes without saying that the odds are pretty good that our climate will change over the course of the next 40 years, or even the next 12 years.  It always has in the past and so we should expect it to continue to change in the future.  What should we do about it?  Well, we do what our ancestors have always done, we adapt.  Our ancestors knew enough to come in out of the rain or to wear a garment when it was cold and to take that garment off when it got hot. God gave most folks a brain, the ability to feel cold and heat and the commonsense to adapt.

It is a provable scientific fact that our climate has changed over the years, therefore it is more than reasonable to assume that it will continue to change into the future. But, anyone that actually believes that mankind has any power and/or control over this is either sadly mistaken or is purposely lying for some agenda driven reason. I remember very well when Al Gore was preaching back in the 1970's that the next ice age was upon us if we didn't change our ways! There are people in this world that want to control people and their resources. That is what this is really all about!

It's just incredible to me that we still have people like Chuckie, and his brothers-in-arm there on the left, who actually seem to think that they are somehow more powerful than God Himself! They always say that scientists that study ‘climate change’ always find it alarming, but, they never reference the majority of scientists who disagree.  Fluctuations in our climate are going to occur, it’s a no brainer, and we should avoid reading too much into them. And we should also resist being convinced that there is actually something we can do to have any impact on them.

Make no mistake, the Senator from Wall Street is not in the habit of making predictions, what he does is to announce his intentions. There is a goal here, one talked about only when behind closed doors.  You see, once the left has succeeded in reducing white Christians to a small minority, completely disarmed, and replaced by the third world hoards that they are now actively encouraging to come here, they will use their archaic environmental laws to reduce their indentured servants to the same level of genteel poverty that they fled when enticed to come to this country.

THE DEMOCRATS COME OUT OF THEIR SOCIALIST CLOSET…

What is it about this president that has caused so many within the Democrat Party to suddenly become so willing to reveal their inner Socialist and to appear so eager to finally operate out in the bright light of day as those who we have always thought that they were.  It would seem that with the election of President Trump, something strange has come over a great many of those leftist who consider themselves proud ‘Democrats’.  And it seems to have brought about a sense of liberation for both elected members, as well as the leaders, of the Democrat Party to the point where they now no longer the least bit shy about admitting who they are and what it is that they wish to bring about in this country.  

From being willing to murder babies fresh from the womb to the recent publication of something called the “Green New Deal,” Democrats can now be said to be totally out of the closet, allowing the American people, for the first time in a very long time, to see them for exactly who, and what, they are.  Before President Trump, Democrats had always been much less forthcoming when it came to revealing what it was that they were really up to.  But it would seem that these days, for whatever reason, they see no reason to operate in the shadows.  It’s almost as if they want us to see just how crazy they have become.  And the president should do nothing to discourage them from talking, in fact he should encourage them to talk more.

And it’s this “Green New Deal” that is the latest utopian idea to be presented by the Democrats, and is also arguably one of the most insane idea they’ve ever come up despite being championed by the genius, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez.  It reveals much about just how out in the open the Democrat Party is now willing to operate.  And regardless of how insane it is, this cockamamie plan was promptly endorsed by at least five candidates for the Democrat nomination for president in 2020, including the current frontrunner, Kamala Harris.  And it’s upon closer inspection that this highly touted “Green New Deal” has got to be seen as being one of the craziest, if not THE craziest, bits of legislation ever conceived in all of modern day politics. 

And I can’t help but wonder why this entire idea isn’t being ridiculed to the point where its supporters have been forced to go into hiding out of fear of becoming a laughing stock for daring to support it.  After all, the plan calls for the entire U.S. economy to switch to solar and wind power in ten years, an end to air travel, and guaranteed jobs for all, including those “unwilling” to work.  It will be paid for by printing more and more money. And if you dare to disagree, the planet will die.  While this “Green New Deal” is not the first crazy idea ever to be proposed in Congress, it is the first crazy idea to be taken so seriously and to be co-sponsored by as many as ten U.S. Senators and a third of House Democrats, so far. 

A close second would be “Medicare for All,” which Kamala Harris endorsed last month, adding that she would “eliminate” private health insurance — though she later said she was open to other paths to socialized medicine.  “Medicare for All” is not even popular in Harris’s deep-blue home state of California, where a plurality of voters opposes the plan, according to a Quinnipiac poll released this week. Yet the same poll revealed that the policy is very popular among Democrats, with 61% in favor and 24% opposed. When Assembly Speaker Anthony Rendon, Democrat, blocked a similar idea in 2017, saying there was no way to pay for it, he received death threats.  Many Democrats have long believed in having the government run everything.

Democrats have convinced themselves that the best way to beat President Trump is to emulate him, at least the version of him that they have in their heads.  They see him as a fascist, so they feel emboldened to share their radical views. They are told by the media that he is a liar, so they simply make things up. They believe the border wall was a cynical gimmick, so they have adopted catchy labels like “Green New Deal,” regardless of substance.  What they fail to understand is that for all his bluster, Trump is a conventional president, whose beliefs are well within the mainstream of American politics, whose policies have restored the constitutional balance and helped the “working class” Democrats claim to represent.

Of the many flaws inherent to collectivism, it is ALWAYS pushed by the same people who have never run a business, never met a payroll, often never even had a real private sector job.  And yet they see themselves as ALWAYS knowing better how things should run than those who do it, or have done it, for a living.  The level of ignorance and of arrogance is unbelievable.  But Capitalism, like Republicanism, requires a moral population in order to make it all work. Actually, ANY system does. But Socialism and Communism dump any semblance of moral restraint right off the bat in favor of ‘enlightened government officials’, and since power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely, it is Katy bar the door.

Democrats will never admit that Capitalism is the only financial system ever proven to lift entire populations out of poverty and provide a higher standard of living for the vast majority of people, relative to what’s seen in the communist/fascist or tribal worlds.  But you see, this is what the Democrats cannot tolerate, because those who are successful and enjoy a reasonable standard of living have no need of those social services that only the government can provide.  And therefore they tend not to vote for Democrats.  So therefore Democrats must devise a way that prevents individuals from achieving any level of success that permits them to escape dependence upon the government.  Hence the rationale for pushing socialism.

The one way to expose these nuts, is to allow them to talk. Don't shut them up, let them go on, exposing themselves for what they are. It may well be part of God's plan to provoke them into a self-committal.  President Trump operates on so many levels, it's amazing to watch.  President Trump may have some considerable faults, but these Democrats have fundamental goals.  And if achieved, those goals will ensure that we become a people incapable of electing our own leaders.  This next election isn’t going to be about President Trump. Sure, he’ll be on the ballot, but this next election is really going to about us. These Democrats aren’t trying to defeat President Trump. They’re trying to defeat those of us who love freedom.

And finally, no matter how many times the Democrats attempt to sell the old canard of “no, no, socialism is really a good thing... we won't have barbed wire and gulags and lines for toilet paper... we'll do it right”, will never fly in this country, at least to the extent necessary.  It is a fact that everywhere Socialism has ever been tried it has been an abject failure with the only result having been poverty on what has been nothing less than a massive scale. It is a system based on system of governance which inevitably results in an elite cadre of unaccountable bureaucrats running every aspect of the economy and hence people's lives. This ALWAYS fails and results in only misery, poverty and mass murder. The majority of Americans don't want it.

A NEW TALE OF TWO AMERICAS???

Once upon a time we were told, by a Democrat then running for president, a tail of “two Americas” in which the teller of the story was referring to social stratification in American society.  The year was 2004 and the candidate was John Edwards who in telling his story was referencing America’s haves and have-nots.  But more recently, this tail of two Americas has been revised so as to be more about the direction this country should now be headed.  Because there is now a growing number of politicians advocating for America to abandon completely that which allowed her to become the most prosperous, and the freest, nation in all of human history, and accept Socialism. 

And it’s after Tuesday night’s State of the Union address, and the Democrat reaction to it, that alarm bells should now be going off in the head of every freedom loving American.  In a way, the entire experience, besides being a little bizarre, was more than a little revealing.  Now for the record I did watch both the president and the so-called response from Ms. Abrams.  And the one striking thing that I noticed was how, unlike past years, this year the address and the corresponding response was less about the differing views of where we should go as a country than it was about making clear   the divide that now seems to exist between the opinions of WHO we are as a country.

First, of course, we had President Trump.  He delivered a speech which was peppered with the various types of policy proposals that we have come to expect from a State of the Union Address.  What was different about this speech was that it was also full of celebrations of America and Americans.  In a sense it was a rallying cry for American exceptionalism.  And what was more than a little bizarre was how the Democrats chose to react to it.  I mean, you’d expect them to disagree with and/or disapprove of certain policy proposals but most Democrats refused even to applaud the idea of a government-led push to eradicate AIDS in 10 years.  Which was strange.

And when the president talked about ending human trafficking and the smuggling of narcotics by drug cartels, Democrats again didn’t seem to be the least bit interested.  So, are we now to assume that for some strange reason they actually support human and drug smuggling?  What else are we to think if they seem to oppose measures to fight them?  And on the issue of improving health care for our Veterans, Democrats again sat on their hands.  On the concept of freedom and the United States never becoming a socialist country, it was again silence from the left. Democrats didn’t even applaud a booming economy and record low black and Hispanic unemployment.

But the different visions of what our country is didn’t end with the president’s speech. Nope, not by a long shot, because it was with the official “Democrat Response” that the night became even stranger.  Stacey Abrams, yet to admit defeat in the 2018 race for Georgia governor, delivered an official response that amounted to little more than a personal list of reasons for why she thinks she lost her election.   She seems to be following the Hitlery model of blaming everyone, and everything, but herself for the fact that she lost.  It would seem that the ONLY way Democrats can lose elections today is because of racism, misogyny or because someone cheated.

This ‘response’ seemed unlike any other I have ever bothered sticking around to listen to.  Abrams started off with a story about her father who allegedly gave his jacket to a homeless man.  And it was from there that she launched into an endorsement of collectivism.  And apparently the moral of her bizarre story was, “We do not succeed alone.”  Now if the story about her father is true, it was an action that he took on his own, an act of individual charity, which is almost uniquely American.  Democrats, however, want to use the power of government to force people into giving their jackets to others. That isn’t charity, nor is it freedom, that, my friends, is tyranny.

And again it was in Ms. Abrams seeming to make things up as she went along that she went on to declare, “Under the current administration, far too many hard-working Americans are falling behind, living paycheck to paycheck, most without labor unions to protect them from even worse harm.  The Republican tax bill rigged the system against working people. Rather than bringing back jobs, plants are closing, layoffs are looming and wages struggle to keep pace with the actual cost of living.”  What we have here is an example of propaganda in its purest form.  She knew what she was saying had no resemblance to the truth, but she said it anyway, she had to.

People living paycheck to paycheck aren’t living beyond their means, they’re victims. Those not in unions haven’t chosen not to join one, they’re being denied it somehow. There are more jobs than people looking for work, but no one can find a job and the economy is in mid-collapse.   There is today in America, an entire industry made up of politicians, all manner of celebrities and the wealthy, on the left working non-stop in an effort to convince people that no matter how good things appear, they’re really awful. In fact they’re worse than awful.  And the ‘fake news’ media is right there to drive the point home, by backing up all of the false claims with all manner of lies.

And while they will deny it, the dirty little secret is that the Democrats can survive only by convincing people that they’re victims, that they will be unable to get ahead without their help, without government. They seek to enslave people by creating a dependency on government ‘benefits’, it’s the key to their success.  And such was the point that Ms. Abrams was trying so hard to drive home during her silly attempt at responding to President Trump’s address on Tuesday night.  I’d like to think that most folks were able to recognize it for what it was, an attempt to make folks see things not as they really are, but instead how it is that the Democrats wish them to be. 

And finally, if Democrats are actually right, and things are so bad here in America, then why is it that there are thousands of migrants lining up at our southern border wanting to come here?  Why don't they head south to Costa Rica or to Panama, both reasonably well-developed nations with good economies, low cost of living and plenty of job opportunities?  And why aren’t we seeing thousands of Americans fleeing this racist, sexist, misogynistic country where those awful capitalists want nothing more than to exploit you and keep you down?  The answer is a relatively simply one, there is still no country anywhere that provides one the same opportunities as America.

THE DEMOCRAT NON-RESPONSE RESPONSE TO THE PRESIDENT’S STATE OF THE UNION…

Those who happened to be tuned into Fox News last night for President Trump’s third State of the Union address would have heard, Chris Wallace, one of the many leftwing NeverTrumpers who have come to reside there at Fox, thoroughly poo-poo the president’s address before then turning right around and heaping all manner of praise on what was described as being the Democrat Party’s official ‘response’ given by, she who like Hitlery refuses to admit defeat, Stacey Abrams, who had obviously been cleaned up more than just a bit before her appearance on national television.

Despite Wallace’s rather glowing critique, Ms. Abrams droned on for I’m not sure how long doing little more than to magically transport those watching back in time, back to the 1960s, as the picture she painted of America bore very little resemblance to America as it actually exists here in 2019.  And it was in fairly short order that it became rather apparent that she was much less interested in simply responding to the president’s address than she was in creating some sort of alternate universe as she claimed the president’s policies were actually damaging the American economy. 

And it was in speaking before an audience made up almost exclusively of women that Abrams didn’t stray too far from the talking points that she had likely been provided with by Chuckie Schumer.  As evidenced by when she said, “The Republican tax bill rigged the system against working people. Rather than bringing back jobs, plants are closing, layoffs are looming, and wages struggle to keep pace with the actual cost of living.”  Now anyone watching, and who has been paying the least bit of attention over the last couple of years, had to be scratching their head at that one.

It was in listening to Abrams, which was something I actually had to force myself to do, that she seemed, at least to me, to have lost her grip on reality.  The Trump tax cuts offered relief to middle-class families.  More than that, they helped the economy soar to 3 percent annual growth, creating 304,000 new jobs last month alone, and boosting wages for blue-collar workers.  In fact, blue-collar wages are now rising faster than wages for white-collar workers, as has reported by any number of reliable news outlets.  And overall wage growth is at its best pace in over a decade.

Yes, there have been the occasional plant closures but they have been overwhelmed by the number of new job openings.  Currently, there are more jobs available in the U.S. than there are unemployed people to fill them. Manufacturing, in particular, has soared, the U.S. economy has defied the low expectations of the Barry ‘O’ era to add the most manufacturing jobs in more than 20 years.  Remember how Barry once declared it would take some sort of “magic wand” to bring manufacturing jobs back to America?  It was a magic wand in the form of lower taxes and fewer regulations.  

And I thought it rather odd when Ms. Abrams actually said, “Democrats stand ready to effectively secure our ports and borders.”  That too didn’t exactly jive with the way things truly exist, because the border plan House Democrats offered to the president this month was one that demands that all immigration enforcement end, by the end of Fiscal Year 2019, for any adult crossing the border with a child. Rather than being held in detention, those adults and the migrant children they trafficked across the border would be released immediately into the interior of the country.

Also, the House Democrat offer does not include ANY money to construct a wall, much less a barrier, at our southern border, but it does provide about $502 million for “humanitarian concerns”, funding that illegal aliens and border crossers would have access to in the form of food, transportation, medical care, and housing.  So I’m not exactly sure how it is that Ms. Abrams interprets that as the Democrats standing ready to “effectively secure our ports and borders.”  And it’s by making such a patently untrue statement that she reveals herself as being nothing but a hack politician.

Another talking point presented by Abrams concerned the recent partial government shutdown.  Abrams said, “The shutdown was a stunt engineered by the president of the United States, one that defied every tenet of fairness and abandoned not just our people—but our values.”  But again truth becomes much stranger than fiction.  Because you see, the Senate passed a spending measure to fund the government through February without the border wall funding the president had demanded.  But the House, still under Republican control, passed a bill with wall funding.

The shutdown began December 22, and during one of the negotiating meetings at the White House, on January 9, the president said he would reopen the government immediately if Democrats agreed to funding a border wall. Pelosi said no, and the president left the meeting.  Ten days later the president offered to extend the Obama-era Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program in exchange for a wall. Pelosi again said no.  On January 25, the president agreed to sign a bill funding the government for three more weeks until a border security deal can be reached.

And of course Abrams brought up what has long been another old favorite of Democrats, that being the supposed issue of ‘voter suppression.’  Abrams said she accepts her 2018 loss in the Georgia governor’s race, but “cannot accept efforts to undermine our right to vote.”  Abrams said, “Let’s be clear, voter suppression is real.”  And in spewing what is nothing more than the party line, she said, “From making it harder to register and stay on the rolls to moving and closing polling places to rejecting lawful ballots, we can no longer ignore these threats to democracy.”  

But it’s a funny thing, because according to Hans von Spakovsky, manager of the Election Law Reform Initiative at The Heritage Foundation, it was during the eight year reign of Barry ‘O’ that the Justice Department brought just ‘5’ cases related to race-based voter suppression under Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act.  And it was he who pointed out that what Democrats often mean when they start throwing around claims of “voter suppression” is a reference to voter ID laws which require persons to produce photo identification before they are allowed to vote at their polling place.

And it was also von Spakovsky who pointed out another interesting fact, that those like Abrams might have a bit of a hard time trying to explain away.  You see, in an op-ed that he did for National Review, he explained how it was that “nine of the 11 states that have implemented so-called strict ID Laws either saw an increase in turnout or exceeded the national average in turnout in 2016.”  So how is it that this genius, Abrams, can explain that little phenomenon, I wonder?   Chances are it’s facts such as those that the Democrats will simply choose to treat as if they don’t exist. 

Sadly, it’s women like Abrams, and Hitlery, who give women a bad name. They claim to be strong, intelligent women yet they whine and complain at every turn. They seem unable to lose with grace and dignity, choosing to attack the winner instead of looking for why they lost.  They pull the sexist card, the race card or claim that they were somehow cheated out of their rightful victory. They make women look weak and fragile and unable to deal with reality. They are not role models. Truly strong women are capable of learning from their losses, dust themselves off and just move on.

In Abrams we have another Obama disciple who tells emotional stories, but delivers no substance, facts, or solutions to Americans. She’s a very dangerous person because she actually believes what she’s saying, which is spoon fed from her party of lawless, infant killing, anti-American sociopaths that want nothing more than to see America in decline so they can keep their ‘modern’ form of slavery alive, keeping American families dependent on bigger and bigger government. America is not the nation of leeches, America has done more for the human race than any other nation in history.

The President has accomplished remarkable things for our country and for our people, ALL of our people. The Democrats, as made clear by Abrams response, can only criticize while their constituents benefit from the president’s many accomplishments.  All we have here out of the mouth of the Democrats are promises of all manner of ‘free’ stuff.  The sad part of it is that the Democrats know ‘free’ (Socialism) doesn't work but they feel if they can get enough people to vote for their ‘free’ agenda, they will be in power forever.  We the American people must be smarter than that!