So, it would seem that perennial Clinton
‘butt-lick’, Lanny Davis, has once again gotten his panties in a twist, feeling
compelled again to come rushing to the defense of Hitlery. Lanny became what can only be described as completely
unhinged last week after columnist Windsor Mann wrote that Democrat
presidential frontrunner Hitlery Clinton has a personality deficit
disorder. Come on, it’s not as if
Hitlery hasn’t been accused of being “likable enough” before. But somehow Windsor’s words got under Lanny’s
skin and he reasoned that Windsor has an “irrelevance” problem.
For those out there who may not be familiar with the
esteemed Mr. Davis, he is the former White House Special Counsel to
ex-president ‘Slick Willie’ Clinton. I’m
sure you remember ‘Slick Willie’, one of only two U.S. presidents to ever be
impeached. Anyway, old Lanny first met
Hitlery back in the late sixties while at Yale Law School. He supported her presidential candidacy in
2008 and has often appeared on TV as a campaign surrogate. It was Mann’s op-ed column in USA Today that
ran with the rather harsh headline: “Hillary Clinton’s personality deficit
disorder.”
Here’s just a snippet of what Mr. Mann wrote:
“Because her recent past is uninspiring, Clinton is now showcasing her distant
past — the era before anyone had heard of her. …Needless to say, if the best
part of your political career occurred before your political career, there may
be a problem with your political career. Such is the case with Clinton’s. …. If
Clinton’s personality is her chief asset, she’s in trouble. To a lot of people,
she comes across as neither affable nor interesting nor honest.” To me none of what Mr. Mann wrote seems to be
right on the mark. But not so for Lanny.
In his effort to defend Hitlery, Lanny puts forward
the claim that Mr. Mann is the one with issues. He said so in a response that ran in USA Today
a day after the column published. Per
Mr. Davis: “Could it be that Mr. Mann
actually believes his brand of written bile actually convinces anyone who cares
about solving the great problems facing this country?” Davis began his
psychoanalysis. “Can he be that blind to his own irrelevance? Or are his
personal attacks on Secretary Clinton precisely because he is aware of the
latter, and that frustrates him?”
And Lanny went on to say that he was “disappointed”
in USA Today for presuming that Hitlery is the frontrunner. He sees this as
insulting to the other Democrat presidential hopefuls. He finds this kind of
“biased reporting” really “irresponsible” since it “robs the other candidates
of their legitimacy.” But isn’t Hitlery still
the one being referred to as the Democrat ‘frontrunner’ by just about everyone
in the state-controlled media? And why
not? Isn’t she leading all of her
rivals, both declared and undeclared by double-digits? So what’s Lanny really talking about here?
I guess we could try to explain Lanny’s rather
idiotic behavior by saying this his little rant must have been written after a
couple cocktails at dinner. But he does have
a rather long history of exhibiting this level of butt-licking when it comes to
the Clintons. Fuming about a
journalist’s ‘irrelevance’ when he’s writing in the biggest newspaper in the
country? Really? Perhaps ‘Team Hitlery’ is getting a bit
worried about Hitlery’s irrelevance now that Bernie is ahead of her by 7 points
in New Hampshire. Lanny’s reaction might
actually stem more from panic than from alcohol.
No comments:
Post a Comment