LANNY DAVIS, HITLERY’S PERSONAL STOOGE…

Perennial ‘Clinton Butt-Lick’, and former ‘special’ counsel to ex-president ‘Slick Willie’ Clinton, Lanny Davis recently made the point that Hitlery is just as much of a socialist as Bernie is.  Lanny argued that there is almost no difference between Hitlery and her fellow Democrat presidential candidate, self-proclaimed socialist, Bernie Sanders.  And he went so far as to actually wonder aloud by asking, “Would you find me something they disagree on?” He posed his question this past Monday to the dozen or so listeners of the “Alan Colmes Radio” show on Fox News Radio.  

Davis stated, “They both agree on universal healthcare. They both agree on choice. They both agree on immigration reform. They both agree on the environment, on the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, on every major anti-Wall Street proposal, they both agree on it. Would you find me something they disagree on? Yes, there’s rhetoric about taking campaign contributions from Wall Street, but so did Barack Obama. There’s rhetoric about her being soft on taking those donations, then she asked him, name me one issue that influenced me. He couldn’t.”

Lanny also spoke to Colmes about his thoughts about how Hitlery would fare against Bernie in today’s New York State primary.  Davis told Colmes that people should not believe all the stories about how Sanders is eating away at Hitlery’s lead in New York, and that if anyone says they would rather have Donald Trump be president over Hitlery, if Sanders doesn’t get the nomination, they are either not a real progressive or they’re just a “right-wing hater.”  And Davis also said that since the two agree on so much, Sanders would definitely come to support her at the convention.

I guess I can’t help but wonder who it is that Lanny might be trying to convince, himself or his fellow progressives.  Because whether or not Bernie chooses to support Hitlery at the convention is likely a moot point.  And I say that because those who claim to support Bernie, also claim they’ll never vote for Hitlery, with some going so far as to compare her to the Devil.  And yes both candidates do agree on pretty much everything, from the raising of taxes by over $1 Trillion, to supporting the bogus science behind the just as bogus theory of ‘climate change’.

Old Lanny is right about one thing though, and that’s that these two socialists are definitely birds of a feather.  Which should make them, to anyone who loves this country, equally dangerous when it comes to the very survival of our country.  And sadly it’s the future of this country that has now come to lie in the hands of what has to be the most uninformed generation in my lifetime.  But it’s just such an ignorance rich environment that Democrats can be said to thrive.  And the more they are allowed to thrive the more dangerous they become. 

And what really gets me is how it is that whenever you watch these stupid ‘man on the street’ videos where someone is asking people the most basic of civic type questions only to have them unable to come up with any sort of intelligent answer and have so many people view that as being funny.  On the contrary, I find it pathetic.  And I’m absolutely terrified because these imbeciles can vote.  And it’s these people who are considered as being the perfect Democrat voter because they’ll believe anything if the end with a promise of “free stuff”.     

Democrats have it remarkably easy because they’re never made to actually come out and say what it is that they truly stand for.  And if they ever were force to, even the “free stuff” crowd would likely think they were more than a little crazy.  So it’s instead of saying what they really want to do that Democrats make all sort of promises about ‘free stuff’.  And, as is usually the case, millions of Americans end up taking the bait, hook, line and sinker.  It’s how every Democrat since LBJ has gotten elected and it’s the main reason why this country is in the sad shape that it is.

LANNY DAVIS…A BUTT-LICKER WITHOUT EQUAL…

So, it would seem that perennial Clinton ‘butt-lick’, Lanny Davis, has once again gotten his panties in a twist, feeling compelled again to come rushing to the defense of Hitlery.  Lanny became what can only be described as completely unhinged last week after columnist Windsor Mann wrote that Democrat presidential frontrunner Hitlery Clinton has a personality deficit disorder.  Come on, it’s not as if Hitlery hasn’t been accused of being “likable enough” before.  But somehow Windsor’s words got under Lanny’s skin and he reasoned that Windsor has an “irrelevance” problem.

For those out there who may not be familiar with the esteemed Mr. Davis, he is the former White House Special Counsel to ex-president ‘Slick Willie’ Clinton.  I’m sure you remember ‘Slick Willie’, one of only two U.S. presidents to ever be impeached.  Anyway, old Lanny first met Hitlery back in the late sixties while at Yale Law School.  He supported her presidential candidacy in 2008 and has often appeared on TV as a campaign surrogate.  It was Mann’s op-ed column in USA Today that ran with the rather harsh headline: “Hillary Clinton’s personality deficit disorder.”

Here’s just a snippet of what Mr. Mann wrote: “Because her recent past is uninspiring, Clinton is now showcasing her distant past — the era before anyone had heard of her. …Needless to say, if the best part of your political career occurred before your political career, there may be a problem with your political career. Such is the case with Clinton’s. …. If Clinton’s personality is her chief asset, she’s in trouble. To a lot of people, she comes across as neither affable nor interesting nor honest.”  To me none of what Mr. Mann wrote seems to be right on the mark.  But not so for Lanny.

In his effort to defend Hitlery, Lanny puts forward the claim that Mr. Mann is the one with issues.  He said so in a response that ran in USA Today a day after the column published.  Per Mr. Davis:  “Could it be that Mr. Mann actually believes his brand of written bile actually convinces anyone who cares about solving the great problems facing this country?” Davis began his psychoanalysis. “Can he be that blind to his own irrelevance? Or are his personal attacks on Secretary Clinton precisely because he is aware of the latter, and that frustrates him?”

And Lanny went on to say that he was “disappointed” in USA Today for presuming that Hitlery is the frontrunner. He sees this as insulting to the other Democrat presidential hopefuls. He finds this kind of “biased reporting” really “irresponsible” since it “robs the other candidates of their legitimacy.”  But isn’t Hitlery still the one being referred to as the Democrat ‘frontrunner’ by just about everyone in the state-controlled media?  And why not?  Isn’t she leading all of her rivals, both declared and undeclared by double-digits?  So what’s Lanny really talking about here?

I guess we could try to explain Lanny’s rather idiotic behavior by saying this his little rant must have been written after a couple cocktails at dinner.  But he does have a rather long history of exhibiting this level of butt-licking when it comes to the Clintons.  Fuming about a journalist’s ‘irrelevance’ when he’s writing in the biggest newspaper in the country?  Really?  Perhaps ‘Team Hitlery’ is getting a bit worried about Hitlery’s irrelevance now that Bernie is ahead of her by 7 points in New Hampshire.  Lanny’s reaction might actually stem more from panic than from alcohol.

LANNY DAVIS, DEVOTED CLINTON STOOGE…

Every time I see this guy, Lanny Davis, it seems that he goes a little further out of his way to make an even bigger fool out of himself than he did the time before.  And judging by his most frequent comments, I can only assume that old Lanny, former White House Special Counsel for ‘Slick Willie’ Clinton, must define ‘transparency’ in pretty much the same manner that Barry ‘Almighty” seems to.  Because it was during his appearance on Tuesday’s “Imus in the Morning” on the Fox Business Network, that old Lanny actually made the claim, and with a straight face no less, that the Clinton Foundation is the most transparent of all foundations.  Really?

And then it was right out of the gate that Lanny set out to put forward a disclaimer, of 

sorts, in what I can only assume was an attempt to convince viewers that he represents neither the of Clintons nor Hitlery’s campaign.  As if he really expected anyone to believe that.  And it was then that Imus proceeded to ask Lanny, “do you ever say to yourself, ‘look what I’ve done with my life, defending these skunks, it’s just — is it worth it? I mean, I could have been doing good in my life instead of covering up for these crooks and despots and dictators all over the world?”  In answering, it seems that Lanny just couldn’t help himself.

Because it was then that he proceeded to launch into what can only be described as being some of the most pathetic sounding drivel that I think I’ve ever heard.  And in answering the question, Lanny said, “So, here is my honest answer. I’ve known Hillary when her name was Rodham, before she met Bill Clinton. I’ve known Bill Clinton since 1970 when he first arrived at Yale Law School, and I already graduated. These are two, in my longstanding experience with them, two people dedicated to doing good, to public service, as long as I’ve known them. The first five minutes after I met Hillary Rodham…I was a senior, she was a freshman.”

Lanny continued his rather sappy recollection of things by saying, “I recognized her from the speech she gave, which was a great speech about the ’60s, as the valedictorian at Wellesley, and I said ‘is there any advice I can give you about taking courses or teachers? Because the first semester, Yale Law School, very challenging.’ And she said, ‘not really, but could you tell me where the nearest legal services clinic is?’” Lanny went on to say, “Now, that’s a true story within five minutes of meeting Hillary Rodham. I thought to myself, ‘this is an unusual person who looks like public service is going to be her life.’  Oh, gag me with a spoon.

Imus said, “well you have to wonder, the — how they got from there to the point where, in her case, destroying thousands of emails, at least she learned, she was on the Nixon committee. At least she learned from him, we all know he should have burned the tapes. So, she got rid of emails. That was smart on her part. And then, to the point, whether or not reporting these contributions to, their foundation, and then, where he’s getting these extraordinary speaking fees for these various countries they are getting cut slack by her, what happened in between, where they got from this noble beginning to where they are now?”

Lanny said, “the destruction of private emails is no different than you and me not wanting private emails –” Which then prompted Imus interject, “we’re assuming they’re private. We don’t know that.”  Lanny continued, “every single member about Congress, every elected official, everyone in government is told ‘you make the decision what’s private or public.’ So there’s double standard here, whether it’s Governor Jeb Bush, who I greatly admire, who kept his own server, and a half a million emails he never disclosed. So, that double-standard, which I absolutely defend what Governor Bush did, is clear when it applies to the Clintons.” 

Imus objected, “what does Jeb Bush got to do with anything? Because OJ murdered his wife, I can murder mine? Your defense is OJ murdered his wife, so I’m going to kill mine.”  Lanny argued, “I don’t think Governor Bush did anything wrong. This man who wrote this book filled with smoke and no facts. He admitted that on the air. He said he’s doing the same book about Governor Bush, who I think is a decent, and honorable man. I will say the same thing if he blows smoke with no facts about Governor Bush, as I have about the Clintons. And you were not accurate in saying, the non-reporting of contributions to the foundation. It’s the most transparent foundation, way, way beyond what you’re required to do under the law. That is absolutely a fact.”

This guy continues to have absolutely zero credibility whenever the topic of conversation is Hitlery Clinton.  There’s loyalty to ones ‘friends’ and then there’s what can only be described as possessing a willful blindness to just how corrupt, dishonest and downright sleazy one’s ‘friends’ really are.  And frankly I’m not sure if this is how Lanny really views these people or if he’s so desperate to see his ‘friend’ Hitlery get elected that there’s nothing that he will not say in his effort to defend her.  Obviously he is much more infatuated with Hitlery than he is the least bit interested in saving what’s left of the country.  Nothing he says can be believed.