Only after what can be, at best, described as a rather sketchy bit of questionable police work, by he who had been
described by many as being nothing less than a modern-day version of Sherlock
Holmes, was FBI director James Comey able to come to the unlikely conclusion
that Hitlery had done nothing whatsoever that would warrant her facing any sort
of prosecution. And it is a testament to
his skill as an investigator that he was able to reach that conclusion by
neither placing Hitlery under oath nor by making sure there was a transcript
made of the over three hours of questioning.
It’s no wonder he is in his current position of FBI director, right.
As someone looking in from the outside, I would
argue that the director more closely resembled Inspector Clouseau as he
appeared before the House Oversight Committee this past Thursday, where his
testimony was seen as being important enough to place ‘him’ under oath. It was then that he was provided with an opportunity
to justify an unjustifiable decision not to recommend that Hitlery be
prosecuted for her blatant, and purposeful mishandling of classified
information. There seemed to be little
disagreement that she had done it, but it was apparently determined that she
really didn’t mean to do it. An excuse
that works only for Democrats, or a Clinton.
But having said that, here are the seven key
takeaways.
1. Hitlery to be investigated for perjury. Committee
chair Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-UT) told Comey that given the facts he had
presented, Hillary Clinton had clearly lied under oath to the Benghazi
committee and would be referred for investigation.
2. Hitlery gave classified information to people
without security clearance. Chaffetz: “Did Hillary Clinton give non-cleared
people access to classified information?” Comey: “Yes.” That included her email
administrators and her lawyers.
3. Hitlery had “intent” to break the law. Rep. Trey Gowdy (R-SC) confronted Comey with the overwhelming evidence that Clinton intended
to break the law, contradicting Comey’s contention that there was insufficient
evidence of Clinton’s intent.
4. The FBI did not investigate whether Hitlery had
lied to them. They interviewed her on Saturday without placing her under oath
or recording the meeting, and Comey admitted he did not “parse” the record of
her interview to see if she lied.
5. Hitlery’s best defense is that she is too stupid
and incompetent to have known better. Comey said that Clinton might not be
“sophisticated” enough to tell when documents were classified — though members
of the committee showed otherwise.
6. Hitlery is probably still being investigated for
corruption regarding the Clinton Foundation. Comey said that other
investigations against Hitlery’s team had ended, but would not confirm or deny
an ongoing probe into the Clinton Foundation.
7. Democrats showed no interest in holding Hitlery
accountable. Instead, they attacked Donald Trump, complained that the hearings
were political, praised Comey for his integrity, and made false accusations of
bias against the committee.
Oh, and let’s not forget how Hitlery mishandled
human and signal intelligence on an unauthorized private server. It was Rep. Will Hurd (R-TX) who came out of
left field and surprised everybody. Mr. Hurd
went after the mishandling of classified human and signal intelligence on a
rogue unauthorized private server and others without security clearance had
access. It was a visibly angry Hurd who
said, "I spent 9 1/2 years as an undercover officer in the CIA. I was the
guy in the back alleys, collecting intelligence, passing it to lawmakers. I’ve
seen my friends killed. I’ve seen assets put in harms way." And he then asked, "Does SAP include
Humint and Sigint?"
Comey said that it was possible, but he couldn’t say
in this setting. Hurd said, "The
Secretary of State had an unauthorized email server in her basement, those are
your words." And then asked, "Who
or what was protecting that server?"
To which Comey responded, "Not much." Hurd asked, "You don’t think this sends
a message to other employees that if the former Secretary of State can have an
unauthorized server in their basement that transmits top secret information…
that’s not a problem?" Comey
answered saying, "There will be discipline from termination to
reprimand–and everything in between–for people who mishandle classified
information."
Those unfamiliar with Comey were likely unaware,
before this past week, that he’s your common household-variety political
hack. And when his testimony was over I’m
sure he went back to his office and had a good laugh. The events of this week which involved both Comey
and Hitlery should come as no surprise.
After all, this isn’t the first time Comey has investigated the Clintons.
And in the past, and in each and every
instance, he also found that there was never any wrong doing despite the fact
that there was plenty of evidence that would have seemed to suggest
otherwise. Apparently it’s his job is to
make sure nothing comes from Clinton investigations.
So, Mr. Comey can now be said to be 0 for 3 when it
comes to the Clintons. Comey was part of the Whitewater Investigation, the Marc
Rich investigation (Rich was a Clinton donor that was pardoned by Slick Willie),
and now the Hitlery Email Investigation. Lots of investigations, but no
convictions. Given his history with this pair, isn't it a little suspicious
that Hitlery’s FBI interview was neither taped nor transcribed? Each investigation has ended with Comey's
"strong admonitions" of the Clinton's; yet, despite allot of evidence
of wrongdoing, no convictions. Is Comey so incompetent that he has let the
Clinton's evade justice for 20+ years?
And what really irritates me is hearing from so very
many people about how this guy was supposed to be such an honorable man, that
he would go wherever the facts lead him and not be swayed by the politics. And it was all a bunch of bullshit. Am I actually supposed to believe that they
were all somehow completely oblivious to the rather checkered history between
this ‘standup guy’ and the sleazy Clinton’s?
He’s either a shitty cop or one on the receiving end of some rather
hefty payoffs. The damage he has done to
the image of the FBI may very well be irreparable. And the sad thing is, I don’t think he even
cares. I know Hitlery and ‘Slick Willie’
don’t.
No comments:
Post a Comment