I’m really getting tired of all these RINOs who seem
to repeatedly side with the Democrats in their effort to prevent our duly
elected president from carrying out the duties of his office and to make good
on the promises he made that got him elected.
If they are going to continue to ally themselves with the likes of
Chuckie Schumer, ‘Little Dick’ Durbin and Nancy Pelosi, then why are we wasting
our time even voting for them? And lead
by the well-known spineless squish Mitch McConnell, there are now said to be at
least seven RINOs in the Senate ready to stand in opposition to President
Trump’s having now declared a Nation Emergency at our southern border.
One of those seven we have RINO Susan Collins from
Maine and apparently another is RINO Lamar Alexander from Tennessee. And it was during a speech from the Senate
floor on Thursday, that Alexander stated that he does not support President
Trump’s emergency declaration. He said,
“I support what the president wants to do on border security, but I do not
support the way he has been advised to do it. It is unnecessary and unwise to
turn a border crisis into a constitutional crisis about separation of powers
when the president already has Congressional funding authority to build the 234
miles of border wall that he requested in his January 6 letter to the Senate.”
RINO Alexander then went on to add, “Mr. President,
there has never been an instance where a president of the United States has
asked for funding, Congress has refused it, and the president has then used the
national emergency act to justify spending the money anyway. If President Trump
can build a wall when Congress has refused to provide the funding, then the next
president can declare a national emergency and tear the wall down, or declare
climate change an emergency and stop oil exports and offshore drilling. There
is no limit to the imagination of what the next left-wing president could do to
harm our country with this precedent.”
And from there Alexander continued, “After an
American Revolution against a king, our founders chose not to create a chief
executive who could tax the people and spend their money any way he chose. The
Constitution gave that responsibility exclusively to a Congress elected by the
people, and every one of us United States senators has taken an oath to support
that Constitution. Separation of powers is a crucial constitutional imperative
that goes to the very heart of our freedom.”
Alexander then proceeded to quote the late Supreme Court Justice Antonin
Scalia about the importance of the separation of powers in protecting freedom.
But Alexander seems to have forgotten that it was
Congress who gave this power to the president, though it is still limited to
the powers and authority as stated in the Constitution, which means any threat
that a Democrat president would be able to declare an emergency on ‘climate
change’ or regarding the Second Amendment, is not ‘legally’ possible. And now it seems that certain members of
Congress, Democrats and RINOs alike, wish to be more than a little selective
when it comes to the ‘allowing’ of a president to take advantage of the power
that they themselves relinquished to whomever it happens to be in the White
House at any given time.
But why is it that only Democrat presidents are
allowed to push the envelope on presidential power? Was Barry ‘O's DACA any less of an overreach
than President Trump's wall? At least in
President Trump's case, there is absolutely zero argument that this action will
harm the country. It is only a debate
over authority. In Barry's case, it is both a debate about authority, and about
the impact of the action, which it can be easily argued was against the best
interest of this country. Did you also speak out against Barry's DACA, Mr. Alexander?
Somehow I seriously doubt it, which would only serve to call into question your
motivation for the taking of your current stand.
The question of whether or not President Trump has this
authority should not be left to a bunch of career political hacks determined to
undermine his presidency, like this boob, Alexander or that bimbo Collins. Many constitutional scholars believe that he
is well within his rights to do this. And
this is based on a very narrow interpretation of a president's right to defend
our borders. If allowed, this action
does not expand the power of the president in any way, it merely applies it in
a way that has, prior to modern times, not been necessary. And it would not have been necessary at all
had these same career political hacks done the job that they were ALL elected
to do!!
No comments:
Post a Comment