2024, DEMOCRATS CONTINUE TO BET THE FARM ON ABORTION!!!

As the elections nears, we continue to have Democrats once again harping about “reproductive freedom,” but just what the Hell is it that they’re really talking about? Now in the old days it would have meant choosing whether or not to have sex and being prepared to deal with whatever the result might have been of that decision. Fast-forward about 50 years and it has come to mean something entirely different. At least when it comes to Democrats who, as a party, have little or no respect for the sanctity of human life. These days “reproductive freedom” seems to be an acronym for one having the ability to have recreational sex without fear of consequence.

Without fear of consequence because if one’s reckless behavior does happen to result in a pregnancy one should have the ability to create the illusion that said pregnancy never really happened. Except that it did happen, and an innocent life needed to be sacrificed in order to complete that aforementioned illusion. And it’s those in the Democrat Party who see absolutely nothing wrong with that. They think that a woman should have the right to murder her baby, and in some cases right up to the moment the baby is about to be born. And with that said, why is it that those who oppose this warped way of thinking are always the ones painted as being the bad guys?

That said, it was this past Sunday during an appearance on CNN’s ‘State of the Union,’ that Gretchen Whitmer, Democrat, argued that “reproductive freedom” was at risk with the prospect of a second term of President Trump. I’m so tired of Democrats mincing words. There is absolute reproductive freedom. If you want to get pregnant, you can choose to, just as if you don't want to get pregnant, you can choose not to. There is no one saying either that you must get pregnant or that you cannot. Although I would argue that Democrats should not be allowed to become pregnant, and for obvious reason. If you don’t want to get pregnant, do your best to not get pregnant.

CNN anchor, and resident bimbo, Dana Bash said, “Let’s start with the question of IVF. Republicans are moving really quickly to distance themselves from that controversial Alabama Supreme Court IVF ruling. The Alabama’s attorney general says he has no intention of prosecuting families or IVF providers. Republicans across the country now, including former President Trump, have come out in support of protecting IVF treatments. Does that undercut the arguments by Democrats that Republicans are going after in vitro fertilization?” Yup, Democrats can always count on some stellar member of our ‘fake news’ media to be there when they need them.

Whitmer said, “Hell, no, it does not. We’ve always known that with the appointments that Donald Trump made to the United States Supreme Court, that IVF that, a woman’s ability to make her own decisions about her body and all the panoply of things that come from that were in jeopardy. And so this Alabama Supreme Court ruling is a natural extension of that, and that’s exactly why even in a state like Michigan, where we’ve made huge strides and protecting the right to reproductive freedom is still very much at risk with the prospect of a second Trump Term.” She said, “I think the government should get out of people’s individual personal health care decisions."

She went on to say, “I think the government has no business or expertise inserting themselves in the middle of a woman and her right to make the choice that is right for her or a family that desperately wants to have a child.” Whitmer claims that the government has no business inserting itself into a person’s individual health care decisions, but she doesn’t really mean it. Because as a Democrat she’s in favor of just the opposite. There always has to be a boogeyman, be it abortion, climate, gender, war, whatever Democrats think is important isn’t good for our country. Clearly abortion is not something that falls under the definition of “reproductive freedom."

Reproduction is getting pregnant and carrying a baby to term. There’s nothing “reproductive” about killing babies that are still in the womb. Saying that a woman has a right to end the human being forming within her womb is like you or I saying we have a right to kill someone who is somehow inconveniencing us. Keep in mind that Whitmer is one of those people who thinks a man can get pregnant, think a man who thinks he’s a woman should be able to compete against biological women, think a elementary school child should hear/read porn, and think a child should be able to through bodily mutilation and be on dangerous blockers without the parent’s consent.

Someone should really take the time to explain to Whitmer that the Supreme Court made this call without any interference from President Trump. Because of this decision the people of each state will now have the ability to decide for themselves whether or not their state is going to allow the murder of unborn human babies to take place. But this being an election year, I’m sure we can count on Democrats, like Whitmer, to tell all manner of lies when it comes to one of their favorite issues, abortion. Especially when you consider the fact that they can’t run on, and win, their many policy successes, since all of their polices they have resulted in disasters.

Whitmer is clearly a liar. Donald Trump, as president, cannot end abortion because it’s no longer a federal issue. Each individual state can now decide whether, or not, they will allow abortion. This is nothing but another example of some Democrat, aided by a member of our ‘fake news’ media, spewing more of their sky-is-falling garbage. Abortion, which Democrats love and adore more than anything else in the world, is now in the hands of the states, where it should have been all along. What angers them so much is just the fact that they are losing control of an industry that feeds the party coffers. When dealing with Democrats always follow the money trail.

The Supreme Court got the federal government “out of people’s individual personal health care decisions,” at least as far as “reproductive freedom,” is concerned when they ‘overturned’ Roe vs. Wade. Whitmer, along with so many on the radical left, is all for government involvement in peoples’ personal medical decisions. They feel that the government should be able to dictate to the people certain aspects of their ‘medical care.’ And let’s be honest, “reproduction” has absolutely nothing to do with what Democrats want to do, and to do it at taxpayer expense! If stupid women want to kill their babies, at least make them do it on their own dime, not mine!

Joey has not a single bona fide accomplishment to point to regarding his quest for re-election. So the only thing Democrats can do is to bring up the same old tropes. And so the big lie that Democrats are now pushing is that Republicans have banned abortion, with the help of the Supreme Court. Democrats refuse to acknowledge that it’s now that individual states, in accordance with our Constitution, regulate abortion. Rather than 535 ego-driven parasites in DC making that decision, it is relegated to a much closer entity, the state legislature, where it should be. And if the majority in Alabama don’t like the court ruling on IVF, then change the law, that’s how it works.

And other than to appoint justices genuinely concerned with interpreting the Constitution and not focused on trying to re-write it, President Trump stayed out of the controversy during his first term, choosing instead to leave it to the court. A decision that took it out of federal hands barring the federal government from mandating it legal and preventing it from being banned. This from the same party that has taken away a woman’s right to privacy and security in the bathrooms and locker rooms, who have ensured women who spent their lives preparing for competition in sports to be shut down by a crossdressing male. It’s Democrats that are at war with women.

Here we have another Democrat posing as a woman who sees the ‘right’ to kill unborn babies as being the most important issue for the American people. No changes have been made since the Supreme Court did away with a piece of junk law that should never have been deemed constitutional in the first place. The abortion issue is a state question and should be addressed there. No more federal interfering is required. That Whitmer is again raising this abortion issue now speaks of complete desperation of the collapsing Democrat vote. A typical Democrat tactic, get Americans fighting among themselves causing division and hate, in the hope they can somehow capitalize on it.

And finally, I guess I would only ask just how brain damaged someone would have to be in order to place her penchant for ‘recreational sex’ above everything else that is now in desperate need of being addressed in order to get this country headed back in any semblance of the right direction. How is it that that can in any way been viewed as being the single most important issue when determining who it is that should be our next president? If our country is to survive it’s going to come down to priorities, and having the supposed ‘right’ to murder one’s unborn baby is not something that is going to have any impact on whether or not this nation is able to continue.

GOOD NEWS ON THE ABORTION FRONT FROM CNN…

So there’s good news tonight from, of all places, CNN. You see, it’s according to CNN that “some” women are now actually opting for “sterilization” as more pro-life laws are passed around the country after the Supreme Court ruling on abortion. And I gotta tell ya, when I heard that news I couldn’t stop laughing. I mean, isn’t that like saying if you don’t get your way, you’ll hold your breath until you turn blue? My only response to that is to say, “Go ahead!” And how is one’s willingness to get herself ‘fixed’ supposed to alter my opinion on abortion? These people shouldn’t be having children anyway. Do they not realize the yuge favor they are doing the rest of us?

And it’s such a great idea. I can’t figure out why some young, enterprising, young Democrat didn’t come up with it sooner. After all, it’s all Democrats who are in need of being sterilized. Then they can all go along their merry promiscuous way without ever having to resort to killing a baby because it was inconvenient to allow the child to be born. Abortion, homosexuality, and this trans nonsense will eventually lead to Democrats being unable to reproduce and be a significant portion of the population. When that occurs, common sense, work ethic, and morality will once again become the norm, and we'll get our country back from these raging lunatics.

So it would seem that the lefties have finally gotten themselves on the right track, good for them. After all, many of these women are likely the very same women who most likely believe birth control doesn't start until the moment they find out they're pregnant. I applaud them for deciding to get themselves ‘fixed.’ And allow me to congratulate any abortion supporting women who opt to remove themselves from the gene-pool of life. The human race will be much better off because of their decision. And no, I will not mourn for any sterile baby killers. I say more (or less) power to them. Making oneself ‘a mule’ is the real personal choice they rave about.

Back in the day eugenics proponents used sterilization to control targeted populations. That suddenly became a bad idea when federally protected abortion became an alternative back in 1973. Now that Roe is off the books, after the death of 70+ million babies, they have come full circle and are going back to Plan A! Besides, any woman crazy enough to believe that abortion is the preferred method of birth control ought to be sterilized. And the women who are so emotionally disturbed that they would get sterilized due to Roe SHOULD BE sterilized. We don’t need mentally ill people bringing more people into the world. Good for them for recognizing it.

Dare I say that this is a good thing. I can’t think of a better result from overturning Roe v. Wade, than millions of liberal women getting themselves ‘fixed.’ Our country will be much better off if more Democrats remove themselves from the gene pool. And I strongly recommend the same for liberal men. Quite frankly, I have no problem with women who make this ‘choice’ when it comes to their bodies. This pro-choice’ option at least doesn't kill an unborn child, which otherwise would have no choice in the matter. The most dangerous place for a child to be is in the womb of a liberal woman. And children are always safer without Liberals being in the local area.

Proof positive that these very same idiots considered abortion as being nothing more than a form of birth control instead of as a procedure of last resort. Who knows, maybe there will come a day they will invent a pill that women can take to keep from getting pregnant. Or say some kind of a rubber-like sleeve that men could use to protect women. Oh wait a minute, don’t we have such things today? And maybe, just maybe, someday there will be a dozen or so ways of not getting pregnant 95 percent or better of the time. The people in fear of that small risk should just get their tubes tied, nobody wants them in the position of raising children anyway.

And finally, this is a perfectly reasonable thing to do, why aren’t more women, who do not want children, getting ‘fixed?’ If you are unable or too lazy, too stupid to use another method of birth control, this would be the only option. The same should be said about men who do not want to commit to being a father, they should get a vasectomy. And what was it about abortion becoming restricted, or even made illegal, that caused this little light bulb to go off? If they know they did not want children and refuse to abstain from sex, this was an option all along. This is a MUCH better option than taking a chance on getting pregnant and then expecting to be able to kiII a baby.

DEMOCRATS AND THEIR SICK PREOCCUPATION WITH THE KILLING OF BABIES!!!

When it comes to Democrats, I have never really understood their need, their fixation, nor their fascination with the killing of babies. And it has been over the years that simply being able to murder your baby became to be never enough, and as time went on Democrats demanded that a woman be able to kill her baby further and further into the pregnancy until, in some states, she was even able to murder her baby even after it had been born. But then, isn’t that the way it always is with Democrats? Dare I say that it was their never-ending demands for later and later abortions that finally prompted the Supreme Court to return the issue to the states.

But according to Democrats there is actually no such thing as a “a late term abortion.” Take for instance the Democrat governor of Minnesota, Tim Walz. It was this past Friday during an appearance on “CNN News Central,” that Walz defended rejecting Republican amendments on late-term abortion to abortion legislation by stating that late-term abortion is “a strawman. It doesn’t happen,” late-term abortion is an “incredible rarity”, and that “when those types of things happen, it’s because a decision was made to protect the woman’s life, to make sure that those decisions are made by healthcare providers.” This guy knows that’s not true.

And it was co-host Boris Sanchez who asked, “Governor, as this law was still in its early stages, Republicans described it as too extreme. They tried to promote a number of amendments — specifically around late-term abortion — that you rejected. Is that something you might reconsider? Late-term abortion isn’t very popular.” Walz responded, “It’s a strawman. It doesn’t happen, Boris. These are cases — when those types of things happen, it’s because a decision was made to protect the woman’s life, to make sure that those decisions are made by healthcare providers. They know that. They know the incredible rarity of these situations."

And he said, “It’s not as if someone’s making these decisions based on just a late decision that they didn’t get around to making. That’s just nonsense. And again, they continue to split hairs.” So I can’t help but wonder, if late term abortions are such a rarity, then why the big fight over making it law? According to this guy, as it is with every other Democrat, it’s never too late to kill an ‘unwanted’ baby. What this guy conveniently leaves out of the conversation is the fact that late term abortions are up to a third of all abortions, and according to Planned Parenthood, and are performed on the basis of “protecting the MENTAL HEALTH” of the mother, 100% of the time.

Look, this discussion would not now even be taking place if abortion was overturned. Abortion is sanctioned murder no matter how you choose to look at it, but their argument has always been that it’s nothing but a blob of cells. A blob of cells right up to the moment of birth, some say even after birth. So their argument is one that it is a woman’s right to murder her child at absolutely any stage of development. Late term abortion is nothing but a backdoor attempt to codify abortion. If late term is deemed okay, then the whole murderous procedure should be the law of the land. That is their rationale, and one state can set a dangerous precedent.

And I find it all rather interesting how it is that men are completely shoved out of the entire abortion discussion, as if they should have no bearing at all upon whether, or not, their own flesh and blood is able to live or die. It’s rather convenient, don’t you think, that men are only brought into the discussion when/if women choose to demand 1 to 18 years of child support. The left wants this to be a women-doctor decision only, even though it greatly impacts men, and even society in general. I get the feeling that this governor would vote for abortion right up to elementary school age if he knew there was a secret ballot where no one could trace it back to him.

Walz is a total clown. He knows abortion, while as a last resort, was always allowed at the late term for the health of the mother. He fought tooth and nail to keep that in the abortion law for everyone, at any time, and now pretends that it rarely happens. Apparently, because of the morons who live in his state, the Democrats now control all branches of government in Minnesota and this guy Walz has a King complex. All life is important no matter how far along a woman’s pregnancy is. Walz’s justification for allowing women to murder babies is reprehensible. Life is not determined by a baby’s time in its mother’s womb, life begins at conception, not when Democrats say it does.

And it was another Democrat, former governor of Virginia Ralph Northam, who, I might add, was also a physician, who was once asked point blank about what should be done with a baby who was fortunate enough to survive an abortion. He said it would be up to the mother whether to let it live or to let it die. He said, “We would keep it comfortable until the mother decided what to do.” Absolutely barbaric! It’s true that an abortion done to save the life of the mother is so rare that it rarely ever happens. Late term abortion, however, is very real and not all that rare. And the governor knows this to be true or he wouldn’t be so opposed to the laws against it.

This Democrat governor is splitting hairs. We all pray that late term abortion is a rare occurrence, as it should be. If this is something that becomes necessary, for any number of reasons, there should still be a process in place to make that decision, and at least a few requirements that must first be met. For a party that wants to control every aspect of your life, Democrats are particularly unconcerned about the life or the death for the unborn, the nearly born and the just born. They are somehow convinced that this one promise that they made to their liberal constituents is much more important than all of the other promises they have no intention of keeping.

WITH DEMOCRATS WHY IS DEATH ALWAYS THE ONLY ANSWER???

I find it all to be rather uncivilized, even barbaric, that here in the year 2022 the only acceptable, even the most preferrable, way of ending any unwanted pregnancy must always result in the rather gruesome death of the innocent baby. With literally millions of wanting ‘parents’ unable to become parents in the conventional way, parents who would love any child and who would gladly take on all involved in raising a child, why it is that death is the only viable solution with the child always being made to die?

And why such determination by so many on the left, and particularly with those in the Democrat Party, that death be the only answer. What drives this rather sick and twisted fascination of the Democrats with ending any and all unwanted pregnancy courtesy of an inhuman death by dismembering human babies, when there is a far better solution, one where the death of an innocent child, a child that played no part in it’s creation, can so very easily be avoided? And why is that option never even permitted to be spoken of?

And why is it the child that must always be the one called upon to pay the price when two supposed responsible adults simply refuse to act responsibly? Gee, what a deal for the child! And why is it that the child must always be made to pay with its life? There has to be a better way, and there is. As I said, it’s just never allowed to be talked about. These children deserve to live just as much as do those who were responsible for its creation. And as I said, there are millions of people who would love to give them that chance.

So you really do have to wonder, is it truly all about the money? Have we now gotten to a point as a society where the almighty dollar has become more important than the life of an unborn child? If so, how absolutely bloodthirsty is that. That certainly gives a whole new definition to ‘blood money.’ But remember, we are talking about the Democrats here, and what are the lives of a few million babies when we’re talking about the millions of dollars that can be directed to the campaign coffers of those out to destroy the country?

And finally, one last thing. Just how sick and twisted must one be to vote for those who actively encourage putting to death, and in the most violent manner, those who are the most defenseless among us right up to the moment of birth and, in some places, even after being born? Now I will admit that I often fantasize about how much better this country would be if the likes of Joey, Hitlery, Pelosi and so many others had been aborted. But it’s just a fantasy. But to continually vote for these people makes no sense to me.

JOEY B, AND THE ABORTION ‘CRISIS!!!’

I must admit that I have a difficult time understanding those who are able, courtesy of their rather unique brand of sophistication, to look at what has taken place in this country over the course of the last 20 months and are still able to make the argument that the most important issue in need of being addressed is a ‘mother’s ability to murder her unborn child, right up to the moment of birth. And that also seems to be the only issue that our *president is willing to discuss. Not high gas prices, not high inflation, not the southern border, only abortion. And in so doing our *president refers to any attempts to place limits on this gruesome procedure, as a “crisis!"

Apparently Joey’s primary concern as we head in to midterm elections is not the price of gas, our open border, the economy or even the highest rate of inflation in over 40 years. What Joey is most concerned about is that there were not enough abortions allowed in the United States after the Supreme Court ‘overturned’ Roe versus Wade. Although we all know they ‘overturned’ nothing, they simply returned the issue to the states, which is what should have been done back on 1973, where it rightfully belongs! The *president warned that “extremist laws” in Republican states were limiting abortions across the country, which he complained was backward.

And in what was essentially a warning that the right to contraception would soon be questioned, Joey said, “Folks, what century are we in? I mean… How? What are we doing?” Joey met with his “Reproductive Rights Taskforce” at the White House, which we’re told was put together in order to help women find access to abortions despite bans across the country. And Joey insisted, “As I’ve said before, the court got Roe right nearly 50 years ago.” The *president met with abortion doctors to discuss their own experiences of women in Republican states begging them for abortions, praising them for serving “on the front lines of this crisis.” Begging for abortions???

And it was Secretary of Education Miguel Cardona who warned that the Supreme Court ruling was creating a culture of “fear and confusion on college campuses” warning of a “chilling” effect on universities. And it’s anyone who’s the least bit familiar with this kook that understands all too well that he should not have anything to do with the ‘educating’ of our children! He’s just more nut on the long list of misfits that comprise Joey’s cabinet. And it was a number of hand-picked ‘doctors,’ and I use the term loosely, visiting the White House who also voiced their opposition to the Supreme Court decision. In truth they are nothing more than a bunch of quacks!

And it was one quacks who said, “My colleagues and I have to think about whether we’re going to be criminalized and imprisoned, whether our licenses will be taken away, whether our livelihood will be threatened for providing compassionate evidence-based care (abortions).” One abortion doctor complained that abortion was outlawed in the state of Wisconsin, except to save the life of the mother. She said “Pregnant people don’t have a warning light when it crosses that threshold,” She added that “the effects are chilling.” And another of these physicians who identified her pronouns as “she/her,” said, “Abortion is healthcare. It is our human right."

But to answer Joey’s question regarding what century it might be that we are in, it would seem that we have been taken back to the days of child sacrifice cults and angry mobs of males attacking ‘unwelcome’ people for refusing to submit to perversion. We’ve apparently been taken back to a century where the mental capacity of many people is clearly limited. Remember folks, God gave us a superior brain to distinguish us from the animals. Apparently, those who believe they have a superior brain (those attending college) cannot control themselves as much as some animals. But that would seem to be where have now gotten ourselves.

And isn’t it pathetic that the Democrats signature election issue is the murder of the unborn? Vote for us and you can kill your baby anytime you like, pretty sad. But, believe it or not, it’s even more sinister than that. The abortion industry is all about getting baby parts and stem cells for researchers to study, this requires the murdering of babies, and there are fetal stem cells for every organ, which is why they want to be able to abort a baby right up to delivery. It makes it all sound a little less unsavory, and a little less guilty, if these ‘physicians call it a fetus, or “just a blob of cells,” which is why they insist upon calling it anything other than an unborn baby.

Democrats continue to lie about the real reason that they continue to fight for abortion so hard by claiming that what they’re really fighting for is a “woman’s right to choose.” And it’s all nothing more than BS. Democrats care about women about as much as they care about blacks, which is zip point shit!!! What Democrats are all about is making it easier for some of their wealthy supporters to harvest fetal stem cells which in turn makes them even wealthier and often times turns into big dollar donations to the party. What century are we living in? The century where we have the technology to view the baby and listen to its heartbeat before you murder it.

Contrary to what we continue to hear from Joey, and supposed medical professionals, the true crisis in this country is the fact that over 4,000 babies are murdered every single day in our nation, that’s over 1.6 million dead babies every year! Also, it’s 79 percent of Planned Parenthood’s abortion activity that takes place solely in minority neighborhoods, mostly in Black neighborhoods. And there have been over 58,586,256 ABORTIONS in America since Roe versus Wade signed into law by President Kennedy and the Democrats 1973. And yet according to Joey, because we wish to place tighter limits on the murdering of our young, we’ve created a crisis in this country!

And let’s be honest, the vast majority of abortions are the result of irresponsible, people who insist upon having unprotected sex and who are not the least bit concerned about possible pregnancies nor their consequences. Not because of rape and/or incest! They are simply too lazy/irresponsible to get the free birth-control provided by taxpayers. Then, without any compassion, shame nor guilt, they simply allow their unprotected unborn child, a living human being just as they themselves are, to have their arms/legs torn off, their brains crushed, being murdered and carelessly discarded as if they are nothing but garbage. No personal responsibility!

Democrats don’t believe in the death penalty except where the unborn are concerned. They claim to be tough on crime, yet allow dangerous illegal, unvetted immigrants to flood into this country. They say we should house illegal immigrants, just not in their neighborhoods. And now they claim the single most important issue in this country is abortion followed closely behind by ‘climate change!’ And as Americans are faced with higher gas prices, higher food prices and with inflation rising faster than their paychecks they’re supposed to be more concerned about abortions and ‘climate change.’ The next two elections will determine the fate of our country.

HAVE DEMOCRATS’ GONE COMPLETELY INSANE BY CONTINUING TO SUPPORT INFANTICIDE???

Who would have EVER thought that Democrats could become even more unhinged than we already knew them to be? They have now become so absolutely terrified of what many have predicted now awaits them regarding the upcoming midterm elections that they have completely abandoned what little common sense that they might have once had. They appear to have convinced themselves that Americans care far more about a mother remaining able to murder her unborn child than they are about the price of gas, the price and availability of food, a military that is slowly being made into an organization consisting of woke pussies, and so much more.

And Democrats have decided to take the recent leak regarding a potential Supreme Court decision to ‘overturn’ Roe v. Wade and to milk it for all its worth all the way to November, hoping to use it to avert the coming disaster that so many now seem to think is totally unavoidable. This decision, if it comes to pass, does not overturn Roe v. Wade, it simply returns the issue to the states to decide. And yet, the Democrats are completely wrapped around the axle. And so, I’m curious how it is that anyone with a conscience could ever bring themselves to vote for someone so determined to hold on to their power that they will say anything in their effort to keep it.

Take for example Nancy Pelosi. It was this past Sunday during yet another appearance on CNN’s “State of the Union” that Pelosi made the rather idiotic claim that the current Supreme Court was “dangerous” for families and freedom in America. And when asked about Roe v. Wade potentially being overturned by the Supreme Court, Pelosi said, “Who would have ever suspected that a creature like Donald Trump would become president of the United States by waving a list of judges he would appoint, therefore, getting the support of the far-right — and appointing those anti-freedom justices to the court. So, this is not about long game. We played a long game."

And Pelosi went on to say, “We won Roe v. Wade a long time ago. We voted to protect it over time.” And there you have it! The Supreme Court doesn't do Nancy’s business, so this institution designed to keep checks and balances on Congress and the President is now “dangerous.” She continued, “Let’s not take our eye off the ball. The ball is this court, which is dangerous to the freedoms of our country. Beware in terms of marriage equality, beware in terms of other aspects of it, and so it is. Let’s not waste our time on that. The fact is, this is a dangerous court to families, to freedom in our country. And that is why people have to mobilize."

And Pelosi added, “My saying is we don’t agonize. We organize, we go out there and make sure people know that if they, actually elections have consequences.” Let’s be honest here, the Democrat Party, as it presently exists, led by the likes of Chuckie Schumer and Nancy Pelosi and propped up by a blatantly corrupt ‘fake news’ media that’s only purpose is to serve as the party’s propaganda machine, is the greatest threat our country faces today. The ‘usual behavior’ displayed by those on the left during the lockdowns in 2020, was burning and looting small businesses, assaulting business owners and police officers, and committing numerous murders.

Pelosi, and her Democrat Party, wants ‘the State’ to determine what rights citizens have, not some old musty pieces of paper called the Bill of Rights or our Constitution. The Supreme Court stands in the way of ‘the State, and she hates that. She would be very happy if the Judicial Branch was somehow placed under the jurisdiction of the Legislative Branch, resulting in only two branches of government Executive and Legislative. Liberal Death Cult, that’s the Democrat Party platform for 2022. They’re desperate to distract from their high inflation, high gas, skyrocketing food prices, baby food insecurity, the grooming of kindergarteners and gender-bender nonsense.

This poor excuse of a human being appears to have gone totally mad. She’s now claiming that one third of our government is a danger to America? It’s impossible to imagine that a member of Congress, especially the Speaker of the House, can be so ignorant. Along with ‘Shitbag Joey’ & Co. the totally destructive manner in which Democrats have chosen to ‘govern’ should prove to everyone, liberal or conservative, willing to look at things objectively, that these Democrats are clearly on a mission, and that mission is…to destroy America. Look at the level of destruction these people have caused to this country in just two years. How much longer can we survive?

Imagine that, a Democrat talking about what’s dangerous to freedoms, now that’s rich. But the left should know, they attack every legitimate freedom there is. Pelosi has delusions of grandeur and seems to believe that the Constitution must be rewritten so as to better allow Democrats to remake America. Clearly, our Founding Fathers were a group of very wise men, men who understood the true danger of people like her and created a system of government that protected the people from would-be dictators. I’m telling you what, the day this shriveled-up America-Hating Hag leaves this world should be made a ‘National Day of Celebration!'

But the Supreme Court overturning previous decisions is nothing new, it has happened before. Other court rulings have been overturned after many years...even 58 years! Plessey v Ferguson (1896) was overturned in 1954 with Brown v Board of education. I bet Nancy, and other Democrats, were against overturning that too. That case, by the way, got rid of segregation. So is Pelosi’s argument that it shouldn’t have been overturned? It’s absolutely fascinating to watch as these Democrats morph from the excuse of using abortion because of the inconvenience and career ruining aspects of having a baby, to being insanely obsessed with being able to kill one's baby.

Pelosi, as is every other Democrat, is a disgusting individual who only seems to worry about her party being able to remain in power. As for the Republican Party, my only worry is that several of the party’s senior leaders, in both houses of Congress, will not have the courage to take advantage of the majority that is likely about to be handed to them in November. Mitch McConnell seems unwilling to upset the standard do nothing activities in the Senate and he is knee deep in his own brand of corruption. Kevin McCarthy is not much better regarding, whether or not, he’ll do anything. Both of these men need to be removed from their leadership position going forward.

Now not being an expert myself on the subject of politics, average Americans are not going to care about abortion at election time when they’re struggling to buy food, fill up their gas tanks, heat their homes and are struggling to find formula for those babies who have managed to dodge the abortion bullet, and all while millions of illegals are allowed to continue to storm across our border! And despite not being an expert, I do seem to have a better knowledge regarding the fact that our government has three separate, but equal, branches: the Executive, the Legislative and the Judiciary. I mean, this is pretty basic stuff and yet Pelosi seems to be pretty clueless.

But when you stop and think it about, what else have Democrats got to talk about if they’re not talking about killing babies. After all, they can’t talk about their many positive accomplishments during what have been the first two years of having complete control of our government. So they are focusing all the efforts on a draft memo from the Supreme Court about Roe v. Wade that means absolutely NOTHING as far as changing ANY existing law!!! It’s just a memo to see where all the Justice’s currently stand on an issue. And even if this decision does become a reality, abortions to not become illegal. The issue of abortion is simply being returned to the states.

And have you ever noticed how it is that whenever Democrats don’t like a particular Supreme Court ruling they start making threats against the Court and start making noise about packing the Court. And whenever they don’t like something in our Constitution, they ignore it, or work around it. And whenever they haven’t got a good candidate to run in a particular contest, they try to invent new ways of cheating to win. The lowest form of life in our country are those who profess to be progressives and/or Democrats who spend every day of their lives working on how best to destroy our country. Vote them out of office in November, we’ll be better off without them.

And finally, here’s a crazy idea. How about we NOT make this upcoming election about abortion. How about we make it about career politicians, servants of the people if you will, who have amassed great wealth at our expense. Instead, let’s make it about $5, $6, $7, and more per gallon of gas when only 15 months ago it was $1.85 per gallon. Let’s make it talk double-digit inflation, the highest in over 40 years. Let’s make it about the tens of millions who have been allowed to illegally enter this nation. And let’s make it about the tens of thousands of American women simply looking for formula to feed their babies. Let’s ALL make it all about that!

TEXAS ABORTION LAW DRIVES DEMOCRATS APOPLECTIC!!!

Can someone explain to me this sick fascination Democrats have when it comes to butchering the unborn? This whole discussion seems so surreal. It’s a child, with a heartbeat, why is it ok to kill it? I mean, if you listen to any of these people you would think that their entire world will come to sudden and complete end if they were no longer permitted to murder babies. It’s all so insane. And in proving what I say is true it was former Bush political ‘strategist’ Matthew Dowd, during an appearance on MSDNC’s “Deadline,” hosted by resident bimbo Nicolle Wallace, who said Republicans should have the word “pro-life” ripped out of their mouths.

And it was in referencing President Trump’s Supreme Court picks, that bimbo Wallace said, “Yeah, I mean, Matthew, it is like the ex-president reached from beyond his political grave and is still having his way with women in America and it’s already happening. South Dakota’s governor Kristi Noem, quote, ‘Following the Supreme Court’s decision to leave the pro-life Texas law in place, I have directed the unborn child advocate in my office to immediately review the new Texas law and current South Dakota laws to make sure we have the strongest laws on the books.’ South Dakota today is trying to outdo Texas. Where are we heading?”

Dowd said, “I was listening to the question that was asked Jen Psaki’s and her response to this, and I’m offended by that man’s question. I was raised Roman Catholic. I go to church every week. The idea these folks think that the word pro-life belongs in their mouth, it ought to be ripped out of their mouth. These are folks that constantly talk about pro-life and want nothing to do with doing anything about guns. Want nothing to do with capital punishment, funding health care of the people that may be born because of this. They’re not pro-life. They’re pro-birth. The words pro-life of the people that support this are to never come out of their mouth again.”

Wallace then proceeded to claim that anti-abortion laws passed by Republicans were like “male governors in Florida and Arizona and Texas” reaching “deep into the uterus of a woman.” She said, “Matt Dowd, this is your state. You’ve been calling out its leaders for a long time. With this law I described as a medieval state of affairs, it feels like gender apartheid on the medical front for women. What’s going on in Texas?” Dowd said, “Well, I woke up this morning, and I stayed pissed off, I have to say, and I’m still angry. I didn’t think I could get more angry or pissed off what the leadership of the state is doing, the governor and lieutenant governor here.”

Dowd said, “This is one thing which is the worst thing they’ve done so far but one of many awful things. I love Texas, but I hate our politics. When you watch this unfold, they are appeasing to only 5% of the country and 5% of this state to do this. Two-thirds of the state of Texas wants to retain Roe v. Wade as the law of the land.” Wallace said, “In this moment, male governors in Florida and Arizona and Texas don’t want the body to be covered by a four-inch piece of cloth, against mask mandates. But we’re going to reach deep into the uterus of a woman and tell all of them to carry — 85% of abortions take place after the six-week mark that the Texas law bans.”

Technically, Wallace could not be more wrong in what she says. Not only are these governors not reaching into uteruses of women, they are actually preventing abortionists from reaching in those same uteruses. And I can say with some certainty that it is the abortionist who “reaches deep inside the uterus” for the specific purpose of destroying the life in the womb. It’s red state governors who want the baby’s home to be safe from intruders with their instruments of death. Wallace has it upside down and backwards. And the leftists are being forced to rail against a law that spares babies who have “heartbeats” - making them name their crime.

Wallace has always been, and continues to be, nothing more than a babbling fool with no concept of the truth. She most certainly is not a ‘journalist,’ what she is, is nothing more than a willing tool of the left used to propagandize their insanity. And her lack of logic by comparing abortion with face masks is absolutely astounding. And it’s interesting, don’t you think, that those on the left, like Wallace, don’t mind, in the least, the making health of decisions for those who do not want to take any of these ‘Chinese virus’ ‘vaccines.’ So you see, it’s we who are the threat, but a woman murdering her baby, that’s seen as being perfectly acceptable.

Democrats apparently see nothing wrong with threatening to terminate countless doctors, nurses and hospital staff, to shutter hospitals or to terminate law enforcement and teachers, if they refuse a ‘vaccine’ that has some pretty nasty side effects, while at the same time they scream like demons when they can’t murder the unborn in the state of Texas. Basically, all that this Texas law does is to force people to be accountable for their own actions and to accept the consequences of having unprotected sex. They didn’t take away anyone’s rights, nor did they choose to side against females, they simply have forced people to be accountable for their actions.

And it’s at the same time that, according to leftist Democrats, and their fake news minions like Wallace, genders no longer exist, according to their politicized ‘science.’ And that we now have ‘birthing people,’ because MEN can now birth babies too, so she and they tell us. My point? Since MEN now apparently have a uterus too, MEN now have say in abortions. THEY can’t have it both ways. Just a few months ago the Democrat controlled House passed a bill that genders no longer exist because women can be men and men can be women. Apparently, MEN can then have abortions too and now have a seat at the table to argue the matter. Their argument, not mine.

If women today do not know what causes a pregnancy and how to prevent it, then they’re beyond help. Killing a life due to one’s own lack of personal responsibility is at best hateful, and at worst a sin to be judged by God. I couldn’t care less about a women’s body. If two adults consent and have sex and that act produces a baby, they need to take care of the baby, to nurture that baby, and raise that baby to become a responsible adult. After all, they made that baby, and they owe it to that baby. The adults that made the child need to step up and be adults and take care of what they created. Women always say, “My body, my choice!” But it’s just not that simple.

And finally, yes I am a male of the species, and very proudly so! And, yes, I was not the one who carried my daughter for the necessary nine months, since that is something that is anatomically impossible. And yet, it is today that every time I look at my daughter that I realize what an important part she has played in my life, and I in hers. And while I did not carry her, I did play a part in creating her. Her mother was not solely responsible for giving her life. She would not be the person she is today without my involvement. And that goes for all fathers. And it’s fathers who must have a say in the destruction of any life that they have helped to create.

DEMOCRAT PARTY SLOGAN FOR 2020, “THE ONLY ‘GOOD’ BABY, IS A ‘DEAD’ BABY…

Ok, so let’s just say that you are a responsible member of Congress.  And a bill has been introduced to your body (it really doesn’t matter whether it’s the House or the Senate and neither should it matter, for the purposes of this bill, what party you are a member of) the purpose of which is to require babies born alive during an abortion be provided with reasonable medical care and transport to a hospital.  Would you, as a responsible member of Congress, choose to support such a bill? Now I know to most that sounds like a real no-brainer, but if very recent behavior by Democrats is any indication it’s apparently it’s not the no-brainer that most normal people see it as. 

Because it was just such a scenario that recently took place in the U.S. Senate when just such a bill was introduced, and what do you think happened.  Exactly what you’d think would happen, because what took place is that we had Senate Democrats, led by Democrat Patty Murray, block it.  And for those who may be unfamiliar, Nebraska Republican Ben Sasse introduced the Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act (S. 130) to protect babies who have survived failed abortions.  Sasse went to the floor of the Senate Monday to ask his colleagues to pass the bill by unanimous consent, but that Democrats, as I’m sure Sen. Sasse knew they would, unanimously objected.

Referencing the recent firestorm created by the Virginia bill known rather nondescriptly, as the Repeal Act, introduced by Democrat Delegate Kathy Tran and supported by Democrat Gov. Ralph Northam, Sasse said, “This place fancies itself the world’s greatest deliberative body, but we would be deceiving ourselves if we ignored the biggest debate that’s been happening in America over the last 36 hours. A public elected official — the Governor of one of the 50 states — has been defending a practice that is morally repugnant. The Governor of Virginia has been defending a practice that is repugnant to civilized people across the entire world.”

The Born-Alive Act states that Congress acknowledges an “infant” born alive during a failed abortion “is a legal person for all purposes under the laws of the United States, and entitled to all the protections of such laws.” The bill also states, “Any infant born alive after an abortion or within a hospital, clinic, or other facility has the same claim to the protection of the law that would arise for any newborn, or for any person who comes to a hospital, clinic, or other facility for screening and treatment or otherwise becomes a patient within its care.”  I don’t know about anyone else, but that all sounds pretty reasonable to me and in no way does it sound the least bit extreme.

Under this piece of legislation, health care providers who fail to provide medical care to an infant born alive after abortion can be fined or imprisoned for up to five years, or both. And also according to the Born-Alive Act, the intentional killing of an infant born alive after abortion “shall be punished as … intentionally killing or attempting to kill a human being.”  How is it that after committing murder against anyone other than the most defenseless among us, you at least go to prison?  Why should anyone who commits such a heinous act be permitted to go scot-free?  And so, it would seem that the new mantra of the Democrat Party is: ‘The only GOOD baby, is a DEAD baby.’ 

And an act that was just as barbaric and which came just prior to the controversy over the Virginia bill, which would allow abortion even moments before birth, it was in New York that 2020 Democrat presidential hopeful, Andy Cuomo, signed a bill into law that denies “personhood” to unborn babies.  Under Cuomo’s law, violence against an unborn child during a homicide is no longer criminally punishable.  So there now seems to a rather disturbing trend that’s now spreading, much like some vile plague as Democrats in Rhode Island and Vermont have also proposed bills that would strip most restrictions on abortion and declare the procedure a “fundamental right.” 

Keep in mind that all of this going on at that same time that we had a recent Marist poll which found 75 percent of Americans want substantial restrictions on abortion, including 60 percent of Democrats and 61 percent of those who identify as “pro-choice.”  So I’m a little confused when it comes to how it might be that Democrats like ‘Little Patty’ Murray can claim what they’re really doing here is in the name of creating a substantial restriction on abortions.  Is it me? Am I missing something here?  I know I’m nowhere near as sophisticated as ‘Little Patty,’ but to the casual observer what the Democrats are advocating here is nothing short of disgustingly grotesque.

What kind of an evil monster would you have to be to take some instrument to a crying baby, one just delivered or who had survived a botched late-term abortion, and use that instrument to snuff out the life of that helpless infant?  And who is it that could use an instrument to crush the skull of a viable fetus who could survive a premature birth? Apparently, Democrats have no moral dilemma in such an act of murder. Incredible!  And how is it that ANY self-respecting physician would allow himself, or herself, to be used by a political party as its weapon of choice against a defenseless baby at the most vulnerable time in its very young life? Disgusting!

But I am curious about something. Remember how it was just a few months back when we had the rather unfortunate situation of having two children die while in the custody of our Border Patrol and how quick Democrats, especially those vying to take on the president in 2020, were in their effort to essentially weaponize the death of those children.  What is it that made the lives of those children any more valuable than the millions of those that Democrats seem so eager to kill? Democrats always tell us how it’s about the children, but which children?  Only those fortunate enough to escape the abortionist?   But sadly, now even those haven’t made it home free. 

So this would appear to be where we are now, as a country, and who is it that could have seen that coming?  Certainly not me!  And while 60 percent of Democrats can ‘claim’ to want “substantial restrictions on abortion”, certainly there is someone who is voting for Democrats like Murray, Cuomo and that moron, Northam, in Virginia.  After all, there is still a requirement for obtaining higher office, having won an election.  Hell, it’s only 25 percent of Virginia Democrats who disapprove of Northam.   So you see it’s not only the Democrat politicians who have blood on their hands, it’s anyone who is willing to either support, or worse to vote for, ANY Democrat!

ABORTION: HOW MANY DEATHS ARE ENOUGH???

It’s from the very same cast of characters who continue with their desperate attempt to convince us all of some looming, yet mythical, apocalypse to be brought about by ‘climate change’, that nary a word is ever heard about that which was the number one cause of preventable death worldwide in 2018.  And that would, of course, be abortion, with more than 41 million children being murdered before being born.  Worldometers reports that as of December 31, 2018, there have been 41.9 million abortions performed in the course of the year. By contrast, 8.2 million people died from cancer in 2018, 5 million from smoking, and 1.7 million died of HIV/AIDS.

Worldometers keeps a running tally throughout the year of major world statistics, including population, births, deaths, automobiles produced, books published, and CO2 emissions.  It also records the total number of abortions in the world, based on the latest statistics on abortions published by the World Health Organization (WHO). Globally, just under a quarter of all pregnancies (23 percent) were ended by abortion in 2018, and for every 33 live births, ten infants were aborted. There were more deaths from abortion in 2018 than all deaths from cancer, malaria, HIV/AIDS, smoking, alcohol, and traffic accidents combined.  Quite the accomplishment.

The staggering number of deaths from abortion, in fact, has led certain observers to call abortion “the social justice cause of our time,” since judging from the sheer magnitude of the problem other human rights issues pale in comparison.  The year 2018 also saw the repeal of Ireland’s Eighth Amendment, one of the last laws recognizing and protecting the right to life of unborn children.  Last week, the UK Department of Health revealed that in 2017, the last year for which it has revised abortion statistics, the number of UK abortions hit a 10-year high.  And so it is then that this slaughter of the unborn is allowed to intensify with each passing year.

The fact that the killing of our young is allowed to continue, and at the pace with which it continues to occur, says much about who we are as a species.  And I can’t help but wonder if there will ever come a time when enough people will finally come to recognize the horror that is the butchering of an unborn baby and we can then finally bring to an end this insanely grotesque practice?  This is NOT, as so many on the left claim, simply an issue of a woman’s health!  And I can’t help but wonder just how sick, and/or twisted, the mother of a child must be to allow her baby to be killed while still inside her before being ripped from her body and then sold in pieces.

If there is one thing that the left seems to be good at, it’s death!  And while abortion has been a success for them, their environmental policies also destroy millions of lives every year as does their support of terrorism. Those are just three of many death policies advanced by the left. And just imagine the toll of Obamacare if ever fully implemented. Other single-payer systems already purge older folks by denying services.  And we haven't even touched on what happens in socialist countries when they get total power.  So while it remains unclear if abortion will prove to be their most successful death policy, we do know the Left is nothing if not a death cult.

The left is responsible for the loss of more innocent life than every tin horn dictator, despot and tyrant combined. And if you can convince people to believe that the butchering of an unborn child is nothing more than a women’s health issue, then sadly there is pretty much nothing that you cannot convince people of.  Those on the left are all about science when it comes to things like ‘climate change’ and yet they ignore science when it comes to the definition of when life begins.  The left loves to insult people with moral conviction since they lack any morals themselves.  Abortion is a result of laziness, poor planning and a lack of human self-control in most cases.

We’re not animals, we are beings in possession of a conscience and morals, and therefore should have better self-control. It’s a result of a lack of intelligence and self-control that the most vulnerable are harmed. I would like to see those who get abortions have to pay more of a price. If life didn't make irresponsibility so easy to escape then the folks who decided to have sex and become pregnant (it takes two) would shoulder the responsibility, not just kill it and move on with life acting as if nothing had ever happened.  We need to start calling it what it really is.  Population control, not a ‘woman’s’ health issue. The left likes to cloak themselves morality.

Meanwhile it’s Nancy Pelosi, a fierce abortion proponent, who recently declared that everyone has “a moral responsibility to ensure all children of God are treated with compassion and decency.”  Pelosi released a statement following the report that two migrant children had died at the border, one on Christmas Day.  Pelosi said, “The tragic death of an innocent child on Christmas Day breaks the hearts of all.”  And went on to say, “We all have a moral responsibility to ensure all children of God are treated with compassion and decency.”  And while she said, “The death now of two children in U.S. custody is unconscionable,” the same seems not to go for the millions who are aborted each and every year!

ABORTION…A CONTINUING SLAUGHTER THAT HAS THE FULL SUPPORT OF THE DEMOCRAT PARTY…

I know I’ve said this before, but Democrats are, and pretty much always have been, a group inclined to operate out of the gutter.  It just seems that that’s where they seem to be much more comfortable.  And sadly, it’s been over the years that they have been able to convince a good number of Americans, especially women, to crawl right down there with them in exchange, of course, for what has become a steady stream of taxpayer funded ‘goodies’.  Those Democrats with positions in government are driven by greed and a quest for ever more power and control while those Democrats there on mainstreet are driven by an intensifying sense of entitlement.

When it comes to Democrats in government, the number that seem to be afflict with what appears to be some sort of mental disorder is limitless.  Behavior which can very clearly be labeled as such recently came from Gerry Connolly, a hardcore leftist, who represents Virginia suburbs that rank among some of the wealthiest communities in America primarily because they are populated with Washington bureaucrats, lobbyists and federal contractors.  And Gerry is one of those that you could call a classic example of the modern American elitist.  Or to put it another way, he’s just one more, on a long list of many, leftist ideologue on the public payroll.

When Planned Parenthood President Cecile ‘Cruella de Vil’ Richards testified in the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee earlier this week, Connolly was quick to come rushing to her defense, portrayed himself as being some champion of women.  Now he did this by actually advocating for, and quite forcefully, their literal destruction.  And, it should come as being no surprise that this moron seemed to be completely oblivious to the irony involved.  And apparently there’s now a majority of women in this country who aren’t smart enough to figure out that what is being perpetrated against them has absolutely nothing to do with ‘women’s health’ issues.

And I’ll tell you why.  Because in its latest annual report, Planned Parenthood revealed that it killed 327,653 unborn babies, or nearly 900 every day, in its abortion ‘clinics’ in fiscal 2013. It also stated that in the year that ended on June 30, 2014 it received $524.8 million, or 41 percent of its total funding, from taxpayers. According to the Oversight Committee, the Congressional Budget Office has estimated Planned Parenthood gets about $450 million per year in federal funding.  Nor does Planned Parenthood deny, as revealed in a series of recently released videos, that it harvests tissue from some of the unborn babies it murders.

For Americans who respect innocent life, the one very obvious question should be: Why is Congress taking hard-earned money from American families struggling to raise their own children in a safe and decent environment and handing it over to a group that kills hundreds of thousands of babies per year and sometimes cuts out their organs?  In this week's hearing, Connolly sought to replace this question with another: Why are conservatives waging a war against women?  Connolly said when he had his turn to question Richards, "I hope every American woman is watching today's hearing, because just the visuals as well as the audios tell you a lot."  I hoped so too!

Spewing some of the most insane drivel yet to be heard from any Democrat defending this group, Connolly said, "My colleagues like to say there is no war on women."  And he went on to say, "Look at how you have been treated as a witness: Intimidation, talking over, interrupting, cutting off sentences, criticizing you because of your salary."  And then in coming completely unhinged he said, "'How dare you!'"  And then this leftist dolt went on to say, "Who do you think you are? Making a professional salary as the head of a premier national organization. And daring to actually make decisions as the head of that organization. Lord Almighty, what is America coming to!"

But his rant continued as he went on to say, "The disrespect — the misogyny — rampant here today, tells us what is really going on here."  He said, "This is about a conservative philosophy that says we are constitutionalists — that hold it up," while still attempting to mock conservatives.  He added, "We believe in rugged individualism and personal liberty, with one big carve-out though. There's an asterisk in that assertion, and that is: except when it comes to women controlling their own bodies and making their own health decisions.”  What we are talking about is the fact that we are allowing babies to be butchered in the most grotesque ways imaginable.

"You would never know that the Constitution, according to the Supreme Court, guarantees a right of choice," said Connolly.  I always love when pathetic scumbags like Connolly start quoting the Constitution, especially when there is nothing whatsoever in our Constitution that allows for the murder of another human being.  On the contrary, what the Constitution does is to protect that life from the very moment of conception.  And yet, it was in calendar 2013, according to the CDC, that 1,049 male babies were born for each 1,000 female babies. That means approximately 48.8 percent of the babies born that year were girls and 51.2 percent were boys.     

Assuming the 327,653 unborn babies Planned Parenthood murdered in fiscal 2013 tracked the same male-female ratio as the babies born in calendar 2013, then this group would have to have murdered 159,895 baby girls and 167,758 baby boys.  That would mean Planned Parenthood killed about 438 unborn baby girls per day and 460 unborn baby boys.  To help put this in perspective, the United States suffered 58,220 fatal military casualties during the war in Vietnam, according to the National Archives. Planned Parenthood's one-year abortion total of 327,653 is about 5.6 times greater than the casualties this nation suffered in Vietnam. 

Planned Parenthood, right now, is waging an all-out war against defenseless unborn girls and boys.  And their most ardent of allies in that war is the Democrat Party.  It is denying these children their equal opportunity to enjoy what ought to be the blessings of being born in a nation founded on the principle that the right to life is God-given and unalienable.  When Rep. Connolly was mocking members of his committee for questioning Cecile ‘Cruella de Vil’ Richards for her salary at a government-funded organization, he did not mention what that salary was. She did: It is $523,000 per year. Thanks to Congress, if you pay taxes, you helped pay that exorbitant salary.

So how is it then that the argument we continue to hear from Democrats is about how it is the Republican Party that is somehow at war with women, when every single casualty that has taken place in that war has come at the hands of Democrats?  I guess the bottom line here, at least for me, is the fact that I just can’t seem to figure out how it is that so many women have been convinced into believing that they somehow have a right to end the life that they themselves helped to create.  I mean how heartless must one be to commit such a heinous act?  And the fact that we have now allowed 50 Million babies to be murdered in this country seems unconscionable to me! 

DEMOCRAT SAYS, “DO THAT BABY A FAVOR, JUST KILL IT!”

'WHAT THE FACE OF TRUE EVIL LOOKS LIKE'

Democrat Gwen Moore is a real piece of work.  She, who possesses all the brainpower of your basic, everyday, ice cube, is one of those hard at work continuing to push for keeping Planned Parenthood, that wonderful organization that is the chief provider of abortions here in America, on the receiving end of 100s of millions of taxpayer dollars.  She claims that reallocating the funds to other healthcare organizations that don’t perform abortions wouldn’t be an ‘adequate’ option.  Adequate?  So I ask you, why is it that this private organization should, in any way, continue to have as any access whatsoever to money from the U.S. taxpayer especially when its near sole purpose for existing is the cold blooded murder of human babies?

It was just yesterday, while at a press conference held by the 'Amalgamated Association of Morons', aka the Congressional Black Caucus, that this absolute moron, our esteemed Ms. Moore, made the rather idiotic statement that due to the length of time which women are fertile throughout their lives, it can be very difficult for them to prevent getting pregnant.  This escapee from a mental ward then said, “That is a lot of time to prevent pregnancies, and it’s hard for me to believe that any woman would want to be pregnant every year for 35 years.”  And she went on to add, “So women have been desperately in need for this healthcare remedy, which is why it has been such a strenuous effort to provide this life saving benefit to women.”

While Planned Parenthood receives close to half a billion dollars a year in federal funds, Moore claimed that, due to the Hyde Amendment, none of that money goes toward abortions.  Critics, however, say the money indirectly funds the cause because money provided by private donors could be used for women’s healthcare instead of for abortions.  As you know, Planned Parenthood has recently come under fire after a series of videos allegedly showing doctors discussing selling baby body parts for profit. Republican legislatures have since pushed to defund the organization, some even at the cost of a government shutdown.  But unfortunately far too many lack the stomach for possibly putting careers on the line in an effort to stop what’s going on!

According to this imbecile, Moore, many women with unintended pregnancies carry out full-terms because they can’t afford the service. Well maybe if they were to spend a little less time on their backs there’d be fewer of these unintended pregnancies.  Anyway, she also said, “It has all kinds of implications on a family — not just financial, but emotional, social and the ability of a family to provide for their children really relies on that family being able to decide when and how many children and if they will have any children at all.”  And she added, “I don’t think we do children a favor by forcing women to give birth.”  Now I ask you, have you ever heard a more unintelligent argument used to defend what is essentially infanticide?

And I gotta tell you, for me it remains very disappointing that so many Republican members of Congress still choose to put politics above taking a stand against such a barbaric, heinous, and diabolically brutal practices being conducted by this despicable organization.  While at the same time those like Ms. Moore see it as being totally acceptable and defend abortion demanding that even more babies be permitted to be killed right up to the time they are to be born.  Some even AFTER they have been born!  If this is not worthy of risking a government ‘shut down’, then what the Hell is?  And besides, the one actually responsible for any government shutdown would be none other than our ‘Dear Beloved Leader’, Barack Hussein Obama!

DEMOCRATS AND THEIR SICKENING FIXATION WITH KILLING BABIES…

There’s an old adage that’s credited, I think, to Mark Twain which says, “It is better to keep your mouth closed and let people think you are a fool than to open it and remove all doubt.”  I think that same rule, although stated a bit differently, could very easily be made to apply to Democrats.  It would say, “Better to let think people think you are in favor of the wholesale butchering of babies, than to take any actions that would remove any and all doubt.”

The reason I say that is because earlier this week when the House Republicans decided to show the gruesome Planned Parenthood videos during a hearing, it was the Democrats, of course, who tried their best to block them from doing so.  Which, sort of, begs the question, what are the Democrats so afraid of?  Is it that they fear that they will finally be exposed for the vile and soulless creatures that they really are?  I mean why else try so hard to keep these videos from being seen?

Let’s be honest here, regardless of your position on abortion, it is difficult, if not impossible, to deny that what we have here, on these disgusting videos, is nothing short of proof positive of how that which is nothing more than a criminal enterprise is so deeply involved in what has to be the most disgusting exercise in barbarism since the days of Nazi Germany.  And yet Democrats continue to see nothing wrong as they insist upon shooting the messenger while ignoring the message.

I mean, really, what does it say about those who so proudly wear the moniker of, ‘Democrat’ and yet can so casually ignore such disgusting behavior?  Just how twisted must one be to see absolutely nothing wrong with something as heinous as that which is so clearly revealed in these videos?  How can anyone excuse the harvesting of organs from the most defenseless among us?  I can’t help but wonder how it is that anyone who can ignore such barbarism is able to sleep at night.

Now this hearing to which I refer, where these videos were shown, was in the House subcommittee on health of the Committee on Energy and Commerce.  And its purpose was to consider proposals to expand protections for unborn children who survive an abortion and also the federal ban on partial birth abortion.  The Democrats have long placed a very high priority on free and unlimited access to abortion.  And their actions regarding these videos make it clear that as a party Democrats have no soul.

Reps. Marsha Blackburn and Renee Elmers, both Republicans, want the Congress to give states the right to withhold federal funding, especially Medicaid funding, if an abortion provider is even suspected to violating either the Infants Born Alive Protection Act or the Partial Birth Abortion Act.  And you have to ask, why is it that anyone would choose to oppose such a very reasonable sounding measures?  I would seem to be a no-brainer.  But apparently not for Democrats.

Subcommittee chairman Rep. Joe Pitts, Republican opened the hearing by showing the video of Holly O’Donnell, the StemExpress whistle-blower talking about how a Planned Parenthood staff member showed her starting a baby’s heart. Other footage shown by Pitts showed Planned Parenthood personnel talking about intact fetuses, leading some to believe the children were born alive.  That we are talking about such barbaric things taking place in this country is most troubling. 

And it was during a committee hearing last week that witnesses said Democrats actually refused even to even look at these videos, as if doing so would somehow alter the fact that they actually exist.  In the one observer, some of them looked, others looked away and still others “panicked.”  They huddled together and then tried to have sub-committee chairman Pitts stop them. But he refused.  Democrats shouldn’t have any trouble watching that which they so enthusiastically endorse. 

As was to be expected, the Democrats spent most of the hearing attacking the videos and also attacking David Daleiden and his group for supposedly violating the law. They repeatedly called the videos “heavily edited” and called Daleiden an “anti-abortion extremist.” They also insisted that the bills under consideration were only for the purposes of closing down Planned Parenthood permanently, something they claim would cause a national crisis in healthcare for poor women.

The Democrats also made the idiotic claim that come of their staff members had carried out an investigation and actually found “no evidence” or any of the charges leveled by David Daleiden and his CMP colleagues.  But Rep. Tim Murphy, a Republican, said such conclusions were impossible, since the investigation was only in the preliminary stages.  But hey, Democrats are not above telling a few lies especially if they involve what is deemed as being a favorite cause of theirs.

Democrats, including their ‘current’ presidential frontrunner, like to portray Planned Parenthood as being an organization almost deserving of Sainthood for all of the wonderful ‘health’ services that it provides to women.  But unfortunately for Democrats there’s far more fiction than fact to their claim.  Because the fact is that Planned Parenthood is little more than an abortion factory.  It is the largest provider of abortions in the nation, murdering over 300,000 babies annually.

And apparently the act of murdering babies simply isn’t enough for these sadistic perpetrators of infanticide. They feel compelled to allow things to progress even further.  In an effort to boost their bottom line, this organization has had no problem with the selling of ‘baby body parts’ and, apparently, have been doing so for quite some time now.  And this appears to be an activity that Democrats, again including their presidential front runner, are perfectly ok with.

And, you know, for the life of me I just can’t figure out what could possibly convince someone that it is acceptable behavior to murder infants.  Or how the killing of a baby can be said to be, in any way, related to “women’s health issues.”  And have we, in this country, succeeded in raising a generation of women, our prospective mothers, who are so cold, so callous and so unfeeling as to treat the murder of the child within her, right up to the time of giving birth, as the equivalent of an appendectomy?