INCREDIBLE AMOUNT OF DEATH TAKES PLACE IN THE BLACK COMMUNITY EVERYDAY, AND YET THERE’S NO OUTRAGE…

Now here’s a bit of news that doesn’t seem to be getting a lot of coverage, and I think we can all guess why.  You see, it was in that great socialist bastion of New York City that 77.56% of all abortions performed in 2011 were performed on Black and Hispanic babies.  That revelation comes to us by way of data collected by Barry’s very own Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).  And, sadly, it seems to matter no more to this country’s black ‘leaders’ than does the fact that over 90% of all murders committed in the black community are committed by other blacks.

But in getting back to the topic of abortion, it’s according to something called The Abortion Surveillance report published by the CDC, for which the latest abortion numbers are for 2011, that there were 76,251 abortions performed in New York City that year.  And from that total, 9,550 abortions were of white babies, which is 12.5% of the total; 35,188 babies were black, or 46.1% of total; 23,959 were Hispanic, or 31.4%; and then there were another 7,554  “other” abortions, 9.9%, which includes Asians and Native Americans, as well as those babies not reported by race.

So as you can very plainly see, abortions of black and Hispanic babies combined for a total of 59,147, which is 77.56% of the total abortions performed in NYC.  Another interesting fact is that blacks, according to the U.S. Census Bureau, make up 25.5% of the population of New York City, and Hispanics comprise 28.6% of the NYC population. And yet despite those population percentages, blacks make up 46.1% of the abortions, and Hispanics, 31.4%.  While whites comprise 44% of the NYC population, they made up 12.5% of total abortions in that city.  And no one bats an eye.

And in a effort to put that somewhat in perspective, that total for one city, 76,251 babies killed, surpasses the number of abortions for every single state reporting their abortion numbers, at least according to the CDC.  No other state reporting its abortion numbers surpassed 76,251 babies killed.  However, combine the NYC abortion numbers with the New York state number and any you end up with a grand total of 103,339, which is still higher than any other state reporting, based on the CDC data.  It took a state the size of Texas to even come in in second place with a total number of 71,658 abortions.

I’ve always been more than a little curious when it comes to why it is that minorities, and especially blacks, insist upon voting for the very same political party that seems so determined in its efforts to kill off as many of them as possible while, at the same time, working just as hard to ensure that those who are ‘allowed’ to survive become permanently dependent upon government.  It’s just never made all that much sense to me.   I keep waiting for the day when they will chose to stand on their own two feet rather than to be satisfied with whatever it is that those for whom they vote decide what it is that they deserve.   But that day never comes.

IT’S MICHAEL BROWN’S PARENTS WHO OWE THE APOLOGY…

I’ve been reading everywhere, or nearly everywhere, that the parents of Michael Brown made the statement that they were unmoved by the apology given by the Ferguson, Missouri, police chief weeks after their18-year-old, 300 pound, son was killed by a police officer. But I’m more than a little curious, what exactly did he have to apologize for? I’m guessing the parents of this thug would now be much happier if this policeman had not been permitted to defend himself and therefore had no way to keep this 300 pound ‘teen’ from killing him. As far as I’m concerned, the ones who are owed an apology are the people of Ferguson and Officer Darren White!

But Brown's mother, Lesley McSpadden, who oddly enough has a different last name, took things a step further answering, "yes," when asked if Chief Tom Jackson should be fired. And his father, Michael Brown Sr., said rather than an apology, they would rather see the officer who shot their son arrested for his Aug. 9 death. Brown Sr. said, "An apology would be when Darren Wilson has handcuffs, processed and charged with murder." The fact that these two, apparently, never found it necessary to get married only serves to compound the fact that they were also, and quite obviously, lousy parents who succeeded in raising nothing more than a common thug.

Wilson, as everyone should know by now, is white; the 300 pound young man that was shot, black. The shooting sparked days of violent protests and racial unrest in the predominantly black community that continue to this day. Some residents and civil rights activists have said responding police officers were overly aggressive, noting their use of tear gas and surplus military vehicles and gear. Brown Sr. called the looting that has been interspersed with the protests "disrespectful," but the "First Amendment protesting? They have that right." They have that right to destroy other people’s private property? Where’s it say that?

Ms. McSpadden essentially threatened Ferguson officials when she said, "There's going to continue to be unrest until they do what should be done." Jackson released a video apology to Brown's family and the community, in which he acknowledged that Brown's body should have been removed from the street much sooner than it was. The young man's remains lay uncovered for more than four hours while police collected evidence. Ms. McSpadden said, "I don't want words, I want action." The parents, both wearing T-shirts with messages about their son, talked hesitantly about their emotions following their son's death.

Ms. McSpadden said she feels lost and helpless, and her life will never be normal again. She said, "I have to find a new normal." Brown said, "I'm empty." Adding, "There's nothing there anymore. It's hard to fill that spot with other happiness." Brown's parents met with lawmakers and lobbied Congress to pass a law requiring police officers to wear cameras during their interactions with the public. They also called on the Justice Department to take over the criminal investigation into the shooting. The Justice Department is already investigating whether Brown's civil rights were violated, and a county grand jury is weighing whether to indict Wilson.

"All of our eyes see the same thing, that it was wrong, an injustice," Ms. McSpadden said. "Why wouldn't they come back with an indictment?" Duh? Now just how stupid of a question is that? Her ‘son’, the one that she and his supposed father raised, met the end that they themselves spent years crafting for him by setting such sterling examples. They, and they alone, are the ones to blame for the son’s premature death, and for them to try to pin it on this cop, and for no other reason than because he’s white is beneath contempt. And far from deserving of our sympathy, they are worthy of nothing but our disgust.

And these ‘parents’ actually had the nerve to expressed anger at Ferguson police who wore bracelets in support of Wilson. In a letter released Friday, the Justice Department asks Jackson, the police chief, to "confirm our understanding" that officers in the suburban St. Louis County department won't wear "I am Darren Wilson" bracelets while on duty. Ferguson residents complained about the black bracelets with white lettering at a meeting with federal officials. The Brown's family lawyer, Benjamin Crump, said the bracelets give an impression that the police lack impartiality in this case.

Hysterically Brown Sr. called their efforts a fight for human rights. "They say that this is America, but we're not being treated like we're Americans. Our fight here is to just open other eyes and understand how we're feeling and try to get something done about it." But it was Ms McSpadden who made what was likely the most idiotic statement uttered thus far when she said that she had taught to respect his elders. She said, "I taught my son respect for a policeman, for you, for this woman, for anybody, so if he felt like he was doing nothing wrong, which I don't believe he was, why would he be in fear of him? You're not supposed to fear the police."

Well, you’re not supposed to be in fear of the police unless, of course, you happen to have just robbed a convenience store. Now having never robbed a convenience store myself, I can only assume that one might view the police just a tad differently than if you had not just robbed a convenience store. I mean, if there’s the assumption that they’re coming to arrest you, that might make one tend to behave a little differently. But then this women, like most mothers I guess, thinks that her son did nothing wrong. Well, then apparently she hasn’t seen the video that shows her thug son in action. Look, that this ‘kid’ is dead is no one’s fault but his own. It’s just that simple!

BLACKS WHO COMPLAIN REALLY DO HAVE A LOT OF NERVE…

Ya know, I have an extremely low tolerance when it comes to Negroes who actually feel entitled to complain about their lives. Because the fact of the matter is that if it weren’t for them Barry would have never gotten elected in the first place and he damn sure would never have gotten reelected. But they thought things would be so much better for them if only we had a Negro in the White House. Well we’ve had one, or half one, for the last five years and blacks today are worse off than they were before we had one. But the thing is, that no matter how hard we tried to point out to them that Barry’s policies would do nothing to improve their situations, all we got in return was to be accused of being racists. And now all they have the nerve to whine? No one made them vote for this guy, they decided to do that all on their own.

So at this point the only thing that I have to say to these folks is, "What goes around, comes around." And ya know, I’d be willing to bet that most, if not all, of those now complaining so loudly would, if given the opportunity, be only too glad to vote for Barry yet again. But since that is not going to happen, the next best thing will be for them to all vote for Hitlery Clinton, which I’m sure they will do in great number. And by so doing blacks will once again further prove the point of how it is that they are their own worst enemy. Because until blacks come to realization that they have been played for suckers for nearly the last 50 years, little about their present situation can be expected to change. They are in control of their own destiny, and it is they, and no one else, who can, or should, be blamed for where it is that they are in their lives.

And the one thing that I’m really sick and tired of hearing about is how we in the Republican Party must somehow work to do more to entice blacks into joining our ranks, and about how it is that we need to work on building a bigger tent. Look, it shouldn’t take a genius to recognize the fact that the last 5 years have proven, and beyond all doubt, that bigger government is simply NOT the answer. Democrats have a very long history of advocating policies that are, not only, anti-family, but also anti-individual, and anti-personal responsibility. And look what it is that the Democrat Party has perpetrated against the black community. Today the black family lies in tatters, more black men are in prison than in college, and black unemployment is sky high. And even with all of this, blacks remain a very reliable Democrat constituency.

WHAT BLACKS LOOK FOR IN A CANDIDATE…

As has been demonstrated more times than I care to count, is the fact that when blacks go looking for political candidates to vote for, there is always a certain criteria that those candidates must meet. Of course no where in that criteria will one find that the candidate be required to possess any experience that would qualify him, or her, for a position in government, or that the candidate possess any leadership abilities or those character traits than one would at least hope to be possessed by those granted the privilege of serving. Nope, blacks base their decision on only two factors: 1) race, and/or 2) that the candidate is a Democrat. Obviously race is most important, but in absence of an acceptable candidate that is black, absolutely ANY Democrat will do.

The most recent example of this process would of course be Cory Booker who was recently elected to the Senate to fill the unexpired term of crusty old Frank Lautenberg, who finally died this past June. It now seems that the newly minted Sen. Booker leaves behind a city, Newark, N.J., with not only a rising unemployment rate, but with a crime rate well above the national average, and rising, as well. But all that doesn’t matter, he’s black and therefore deserved to be elected to Congress. Booker won a special election on Oct. 16. The seat in the interim had been filled by Republican Jeff Chiesa, who had previously served as New Jersey attorney general. Booker was sworn in by ‘Slow Joe’ Biden on Capitol Hill this past Thursday.

So, what, do you suppose, people saw as being Booker’s qualifications that made him worthy of being elected as one of the individuals to represent New Jersey in the Senate? Well let’s take a look, shall we? One of the first things that we notice right away is the fact that during Booker’s tenure as mayor, unemployment in Newark increased by 102 percent. In 2006, the unemployment rate was 4.6 percent, and in 2012, the unemployment rate was 9.3 percent. Gee, no wonder the folks in Jersey were so darn eager to send him off to Washington. He can take all that vast know how of his with him to the Senate and spread it around so everyone can take advantage of it. That way the rest of us can benefit from it. Right?

The average unemployment rate in the months from January 2013 to August 2013 was 8.8 percent. In the years prior to Booker taking office, unemployment rates were significantly lower in 2003 to 2005 at six percent, five percent, and 4.5 percent respectively. Crime rates increased since Booker took office in 2006. In 2006, the crime rate was 593.8. The latest data, taken in 2011, shows that the crime rate increased to 604.0, while the U.S. average stands at 307.5. The previous year, as a way of closing an $83 Million budget gap, in typical Democrat fashion, Booker handled the problem by choosing to layoff 167 police officers in 2010. And yet, Booker was the guy that a vast majority of blacks saw as being ‘the’ one to vote fore.

So apparently, such things as high unemployment and high crime matter very little to your typical black voter. It would seem that what’s much more important is to make sure to send off to Washington only those who promise to make it their top priority the maintaining, or even increasing, of the many ‘entitlement’ programs that blacks have come to prefer to exist on rather than to find a job. They much prefer to be dependent on government than to being self-reliant. After all, having to rely on yourself is just so much more difficult than simply mooching off those folks who do prefer to work. So if they can elect people who won’t make them find a job, that quickly becomes the path of least resistance, and therefore much more preferable.

MORE RACE-BAITING IN THE NAME OF TRAYVON…

Simply unable to let go of this Trayvon Martin 'thing', many still stubbornly refuse to recognize the fact that he was just another thug, not the sweet, innocent victim that they just love to portray him as being. So it is, then, that we now have Andrew Young joining the chorus, saying that he spoke with Trayvon Martin’s mother after the acquittal of George Zimmerman and compared Martin’s death with that of Emmett Till, going so far as to call both martyrs in the ongoing racial struggles of African Americans. So now we're to view this punk as somehow being a martyr? Really, Andy? Sorry, but I'm just not seeing it.

"It's a needless sacrificial death and I told that to his mother [Sybrina Fulton]," Young, a former ambassador, U.S. congressman, and two-time mayor of Atlanta, said in a recent interview. A needless sacrificial death? Well maybe if Trayvon hadn't decided to try to beat the crap out of a cracker, he wouldn't be lying six feet under right now. He made the decision that resulted in his death, no one else. So old Andy can take this martyr shit and shove it, because it's nothing more than another attempt to incite, and to inflame as best he can as much racial hatred as he can. In that sense, Young is no different than Sharpton or Jackson.

But Andy wasn't done, going on to say, "I said, you know, Dr. [Martin Luther] King always said that unearned suffering is redemptive and that in the church, we've always said that there's no remission of sins without the shedding of innocent blood."  Innocent blood, right. Sweet little Trayvon, innocent as a new born babe, and gunned down for no reason. Give me a break! Andy went on to say, "I [also] told her, I feel sorry for Zimmerman too. I mean his life is ruined." Adding, "Trying to substitute a gun for real manhood is not the way we want to raise our young people. That was a no-win situation for America. And every incident of violence is that way."

Real manhood, that's rich, especially coming from a sleazy bag, race-baiter like Young. How many 'real' men are there in the black community today, Andy? Men who go out and beat up old white folks just to get their sick jollies, or shoot little white babies in the face. Or how about the men who go out and have sex with just about anything that walks, only to produce kids who will grow up never knowing who their father is, nor caring, really. I'd like to know if that's how old Andy, here, defines manhood? No, really, I'd like to know! What kind of 'man' beats up a 89 year old WWII vet, or shoots a 13 month old in the face, right in front of the mother?

I think we all know that Martin was shot to death by Zimmerman, a neighborhood watch volunteer, during a confrontation down in Sanford, Florida. A confrontation instigated by Martin. And because of pressure from the likes of hucksters like Young, Zimmerman was arrested even though there was no evidence that requried it, was then forced to go through a trial, before eventually being acquitted of murder and manslaughter amid allegations the incident was sparked by racial profiling. That, even though jurors said that, from the evidence provided, race was not a factor and even members of the prosecution team said that race was not a factor.

Now on the other hand, it was in 1955 that Till, who was then 14, was visiting relatives in Money, Mississippi, when he was beaten and shot dead for reportedly flirting with a white woman. Two men were acquitted of Till's murder, but admitted it later in a magazine interview, protected against double jeopardy. So, of course, even a blind bigot can see the obvious similarities between the two events, right? Not! And for Young to compare the two events, and throw around the word martyr, does nothing more that to belittle the true tragedy that occurred in 1955. And for what reason, exactly? Makes you wonder what is it that scum like Young are really hoping to accomplish here.

THE EXPLOITATION OF DR KING'S MEMORY…

MELANIE CAMPBELL

Sadly, it would appear that what was supposed to be a celebration of the 50th anniversary of Martin Luther King's "I Have a Dream" speech in Washington on Wednesday, succeeded in doing not much more than to draw out from deep within the woodwork, some pretty racist folks. And I doubt very much, that Dr. King would have appreciated some of the language, or the tone, used in some of the speeches given in his honor. And it appeared to me that there were more than a few in attendance who were there less out of respect for Dr. King and more out of seeing it as an opportunity. An opportunity to spew their typical brand toxic rhetoric.

One such loon who obviously was not there out of any deep respect for Dr. King, was the president of a some silly front group for the Democrat Party that claims to be dedicated to increasing black civic participation. This particular individual went so far as to compare our conservative Supreme Court justices to KKK members and also made the claim that Voter ID laws are being enacted to prevent another black president. Actually, it sounds as if this idiotic little group, which this racist nut is the president of, is more then likely dedicated to the inciting of racial violence. To make such a rant on an occasion like this, is really nothing short of disgusting.

So in what was purely an act of besmirching the memory of man who she was supposed to be there to honor, Melanie Campbell, president of the National Coalition on Black Civic Participation, said though black Americans are not threatened by biting dogs and KKK members in white hoods, the "dogs are still biting in other ways" and there is still "racism and inequality." Ok, so can somebody explain to me how it is that anybody with a clue is supposed to be able to take a brain dead cow like this seriously? Her dumb ass should've been yanked off the podium! But why wasn't she? Because, my friends, what she spoke of was the theme of this little gathering.

Instead, this moron was allowed to continue, as she went on to say, "Today there are no white sheets, but there are judges in black robes in the U.S. Supreme Court striking down Section 4 of the Voting Rights Act, opening the floodgates in many states to pass more voter ID laws... with the goal of ensuring we never see a black man elected to the president, or woman, of the United states of America." Come on really? You know, by her making such an idiotic claim, she serves only to demean, or trivialize, the lives of those who really were subjected to unfair hardship for no other reason than the color of their skin. However, Barry was never one of them.

And something that I'm pretty sure such people as this Ms. Campbell are fully aware of, is that the objections most have with Barry, has nothing whatsoever to do with his race. It's his socialist policies, his efforts to completely dismantle our economy as well as his drive to increase the size of government beyond which anyone ever thought possible. But that doesn't stop loons like this Campbell boob, who continue their attempt to make it appear as if it is all about race, when it's really about ideology. So she's being more than a little disingenuous, even dishonest, in making her asinine claims which she makes for no other reason that to rile up the crowd.

THE 'DREAM' OF THE FATHER, ABANDONED BY THE SON???

Whenever I listen to the eldest son of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. speak, what I most often hear is someone who sounds much more like a Jesse "the Extortionist" Jackson or an Al "Bull Horn" Sharpton, than someone who sounds like Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. He reminds of someone who would rather live off his father's name, than to perhaps actually go out into the cold, cruel world and do something on his own that would not only build upon his father's already impressive legacy but that would allow him to stand on his own and not merely in his father's shadow. To do something that would actually help those people whom he professes to be fighting for.

He says that while blacks can rightfully celebrate his father's life and work with pride, there is much more that remains to be accomplished. And I would agree. But most of that which remains, needs to come from within the black community. I find it somewhat hypocritical that he can complain about the "staggering unemployment" among black males 18 to 30 years old, and instead of going out and advocating the fact that true change is what's needed in order to have a chance at increasing prosperity for all, he actively encourages those same individuals to go out and vote for the very ones responsible for this disgusting statistic.

Ignoring completely the amount of damage that has been done to this country in just four short years he heralds Barry "Almighty's" election as the first African-American president, which realistically speaking, has been nothing but a grand nightmare on so many levels, a major breakthrough for America. And he bases that declaration not on the content of Barry's character, or because of any great accomplishments, but solely on the color of Barry's skin. We are all, for some bizarre reason, supposed to be proud of the fact that we elected Barry, perhaps the most ill-prepared individual to ever hold the job, as our president. Sorry, but I'm not!

King also told NBC's "Today" show in an interview that he believes young blacks today still "are first judged by their color and then the content of their character." Well what I would only say to that, is before one can be judged on the content of one's character, one must first possess that character. And character is one of those things that one most often learns by example from one's father, and how many black men even know who their father is. Which is nothing but another result from having the government become the main provider for a family thus making it completely unnecessary for there to be a responsible male figure involved in the raising of most black kids.

So it would seem to me, that if the son were truly interested in furthering the father's legacy, he would have the courage to act in a way that would run counter to that of Al Sharpton or Jesse Jackson. Increasing the dependency on the government does not make for a bright future for anyone. The goal here should be to decrease that dependence, and that starts with voting for those who favor unleashing our economy, instead of burying it under needless regulations, an unbearable tax burden and the weight of Obamacare all of which accomplish nothing more than the stifling of job growth. But, you see, that would require leaving the Democrat plantation.

People, all people, need to be shown the advantages of being self-reliant as well as self-sufficient, and the benefits of family. But apparently the son sees it another way, a way different than how his father viewed things. The black community today is laying in tatters, it has quite literally been decimated by decades of what is nothing more than a addiction to government 'entitlements.' And yet, what is the son saying we need more of? If he was genuinely interested in carrying on with his father's dream, he would be doing all that he could to convince as many as he could to wean themselves off of the government, and to assume some level of personal responsibility.

There are those that do comprise the voice of reason within the black community and they are plentiful. That would be, of course, folks like Ben Carson, Allen West, Mia Love, Tim Scott and the Herman Cain, to name only a few. But, oddly enough, somehow it's they who always seem to get drowned out by the poison coming from the race-baiters and the haters like the Jackson, Sharpton, Farrakhan, Wright, all, strangely enough, who are supposedly men of God. And it's rather confusing how anyone would willingly choose to listen to Al "Bull Horn" Sharpton over someone like Ben Carson or Allen West. That someone would do that, however, actually explains a lot.