ANOTHER ANTI-TRUMP HOLLYWOOD LOSER…

Apparently, ‘Breaking Bad’ star Bryan Cranston now includes himself among the many so-called celebrities who have made it abundantly clear that they plan to leave the United States if Donald Trump becomes president on November 8.  Personally, as far as I’m concerned that alone should be reason enough to vote for Trump.  You know, every time I see this boob, Cranston, all I can ever think of is that stupid show from about 15 years ago called, “Malcolm in the Middle.”   And I can only assume that he’s spent the last 10 years trying to erase it from the memory of those folks who still remember it.  In much the same manner, I think, that Tom Hanks has spent the last 30+ years trying to make folks forget about his little fiasco, “Bosom Buddies.”  But I digress.

Getting back to this moron Cranston, it was in an interview with ‘The Bestseller Experiment’ podcast, that the actor said he "absolutely" would exfiltrate himself to Canada under a President Trump.  Cranston said, "I would definitely move."   And this dolt went on to say, "It’s not real to me that that would happen. I hope to God it won’t. It wouldn’t be a vacation. I’d be an expatriate."  The only positive to a Trump presidency, according to Cranston, would be that writers and filmmakers would have a surplus of material to create product.  He said, "There will be books written, movies made."  And added, "I’m telling you, there will be theatrical productions about Donald Trump because of the anomaly that he presented."  So according to this creep that’s the only positive?

When asked if he would ever consider playing Trump in a movie, Cranston said that would be considerably hard for him.  He said, “For me to play someone like Donald Trump, I would first need to have some time to calm down from him because I do have a judgment of him, and it’s virtually impossible to play someone that you have a judgment on, because then you’re slanted."  And this imbecile went onto say, "I need to come at it from a place of neutrality so that I can build a character and justify what I say, what I do, at all times. It’s hard for me to imagine trying to justify what this man has said and done."  Cranston now joins Lena Dunham, Rosie O'Donnell, Jon Leibowitz, Barbara Streisand, Miley Cyrus, Whoopi Goldberg, Samuel L. Jackson and Cher in promising to leave if Trump wins.

Cranston is like so many others in his profession who possess very little education yet feel they are somehow entitled to lecture the rest of us on how it is that we should live our lives.  And far from being someone who can be referred to as an intellectual powerhouse, it would seem that his most significant educational achievement is making it through high school and receiving an Associate Degree in police science.  Now how he thinks he’s able to conjure that into something that allows him to dictate to me who it is that I should vote for is beyond me.  But that’s the way it is with these entertainment types.  They think because they can act or sing, both being professions which actually require very little intelligence, they are somehow so much smarter than the rest of us. 

As another longtime critic of Mr. Trump, this boob Cranston has often referred to Trump as a “narcissist” who lacks the “qualities we want in a president.”  Excuse me?  But am I the only one who sees the irony here where we have some half-baked, imbecilic actor actually accusing someone else of being a “narcissist”?  Give me a break!  And then it was in a promo for an upcoming appearance on something called ‘Newsnight’, on the BBC, that Cranston went so far as to make a prediction that Trump will lose the presidential election.  He said of Trump, “I don’t think he’s going to win.”  And then added, “And I hope that when he loses, he would do everyone a huge favor if he just went away.”  If only Cranston would follow his own advice and just go away.

And am I the only one wondering, why is it always Canada that these knuckleheads choose when looking to escape the USA?  Why is it never Mexico?  And, what these geniuses fail to realize, which is odd since they all profess to be so flipping smart, is that they will pay boatloads in taxes to Canada’s government.  And if they thought taxes were high here, just wait!  And I can't wait to see what will happen when they come to need some sort of medical care there in Canada, only to find out that the local hospital doesn't have the simplest of diagnostic equipment.  Heart attack?  Cancer?  Oops sorry, see you in six months, or so.  Those who flee north of the border after Trump wins, will, and in very short order, be right back here in the good old U. S. of A.

And you know, does it strike anyone else as being a bit odd that while this boob claims playing Trump would be very difficult for him, it’s apparently relatively easy for him to pretend to be an illegal drug manufacturer who's product kills men, women and children and also whose product ruins the lives of millions of human beings.  I’m assuming playing THAT kind of sleazy character in a Hollywood movie, or TV series, would be pretty easy, right?   What a complete moron.  That’s why it’s such a complete and utter waste of time to listen to anything these useless individuals have to say about any issue.  They make absolutely no sense whatsoever. And what is it that any of these losers provide to their fellow man that is of ANY benefit?  They care about no one but themselves.  

And what exactly do these superior people, like Cranston, whose product we've been buying, at ever-escalating prices, for years actually think of us, the Trump Supporters?  Do they even try to understand that millions of Americans have been forced to watch as their jobs were made to systematically disappear overseas?  Do they care, even the slightest, that their savings have been reduced because everything else has gotten expensive, or that their healthcare has been decimated?  Do they care that Americans have been forced to pay more in taxes to cover the cost of more and more government ‘benefits’, robbing them of the ability to provide for their own families?  We had almost given up hope that our children might have a dream of a better future until Donald Trump came along.

HOLLYWEIRD CONTINUES TO GET WEIRDER AND WEIRDER…

So there they all were, those described as being the hottest talent in television and all gathered in one place and to do little more than to celebrate themselves at the 68th annual Emmy Awards.  And yet with all of that supposed talent amassed there in that one big room, he who was arguably the night’s biggest star was not even in the room.  Because it was Donald Trump who both presenters and winners seemed almost compelled to talk about.  Now while refused to subject myself to the goings on, I did hear how these buffoons couldn’t help but talk about Trump.  Why is it that anyone other than leftwing kooks even bother watching awards shows anymore?  After all, they’ve become so predictable, and just oh so tedious.  Over the years I think we’ve all become quite familiar with how it that nearly every awards show, be it the Emmy, Oscars, or Golden Globes, or even the Espys, typically go.  One seems to be a carbon copy of all the others.

You see, it’s always during the opening monologue and presenter-introductions that the host of any of these shows will go out of his, or her, way to skewer conservatives, and in the case of Sunday's Emmy Awards, it was the Republican presidential nominee, complete with all the requisite Hitler-references.  And of course the smug audience stacked with privileged 1-percenters will laugh heartily at conservatives' expense.   Most, if not all, of the awards will go to smug 1-percenters who believe that by scripting, directing or acting in some idiotic late-night sit-com they are doing nothing less than God's work.  And in accepting their award they will use their acceptance speech as a soapbox from which to "thank Hitlery Clinton" and lecture us Philistines on the importance of providing equal opportunities to women, transgenders, Hispanics, blacks, refugees, the disabled, pigmies, circus performers, etc, etc, etc.

Host Jimmy Kimmel who, I must admit, I have never been a fan of, apparently got the Trump ball rolling early by blaming ‘Apprentice’ producer Mark Burnett for what he said was allowing Trump to rise to prominence on national TV.  Kimmel said, “If it wasn’t for television, would Donald Trump be running for president? No, he would be at home right now quietly rubbing up against Malaria while she pretends to be asleep,” Kimmel joked, apparently intentionally mispronouncing Melania Trump’s name.   And it was this hapless boob who then went on to say, “Thanks to Mark Burnett, we don’t have to watch reality television shows anymore, because we’re living in one.”  And he added, “I’m going on the record right now, he’s responsible. If Donald Trump gets elected, and he builds that wall, the first person we’re throwing over is Mark Burnett.”  A line that I’m quite sure earned him a rather sizable big laugh. 

But Kimmel was far from being the only celebrity to reference Trump’s proposed wall on the U.S.-Mexico border.  Because it was in accepting the Emmy for Best Actress in a Comedy Series, ultra-liberal kook Louis-Dreyfus actually apologized for her role on Veep.  She said, "I'd like to personally apologize for the current political climate. I think that Veep has torn down the wall between comedy and politics.  Our show started out as a political satire, but now seems like a documentary.  So, I certainly do promise to rebuild that wall and make Mexico pay for it."   Despite the relentless politicking, rumor has that Sunday night’s show was eminently more watchable than last year’s ratings-disaster broadcast on Fox with Andy Samberg at the helm.  But since I didn’t watch last year either I really don’t know if this year’s telecast was any more watchable or not.  I suppose whether one enjoys watching such antics depends a great deal on the reason that you’re watching in the first place.  

And as the festivities progressed it was ‘Transparent’ creator Jill Soloway, onstage to accept the award for Best Directing for a Comedy Series, who ended her speech by triumphantly shouting “Topple the patriarchy!” and then let loose on Trump in a backstage interview.  Soloway said “Transparent’s” second season storyline that went back in time to the Holocaust was “incredibly timely” given the state of the presidential race.  In her view, Trump’s position on immigration and law enforcement is akin to the dynamics that led to Hitler’s rise to power.  She said, “Jews were other-ized in Nazi Germany to gain political power for Hitler, and right now Donald Trump is doing the same thing.”  Soloway went on to say, “He’s other-izing people. He calls women pigs if they don’t look like beauty pageant contestants; he blames Muslims and Mexicans for our problems; he makes fun of disabled people, this is otherizing with a capital ‘O.'”

It then that this crackpot, Soloway, went on to say, “He needs to be called out at every chance he gets for being one of the most dangerous monsters to ever approach our lifetimes,” Soloway told reporters backstage. “He’s a complete dangerous monster, and any moment that I have to call Trump out for being an inheritor to Hitler, I will.”  This is the level of insanity that has now invaded our society .  While there was once a time that I actually enjoyed watching these shows, that was back during a time when those accepting their awards limited their speeches to thanking “Mom and Dad”, or their supporting cast, or the many people involved in making their job easy.  So as you can plainly see it’s been decades since I last watched one of these idiotic examples of self-congratulating, egotistical imbeciles coming together to applaud themselves.  These shows log ago ceased being entertaining and became nothing more than insulting. 

Personally I’m hoping that those who have promised to leave the country, many of whom were in the audience that night, if Trump wins, will make good on that promise.  These Hollywood losers certainly do regard themselves and their opinions as being worthy of being listened to, but they don’t fool most of the folks in flyover country who consider them to be the lowest of the low.  And at a time when we now have the FEC making noises about regulating sites like Drudge, and Brietbart as if they’re political contributions, I wonder if the same will go for events like this, or the selective editing of CNN or their blatant on air admissions that they're in the tank for Hillary.  Frankly, I doubt it.  And then we have Barry, Hitlery, Cuomo and DeBlasio, Communists all, who actually welcome terrorists into our country.  Killing us off is what they want!  They prefer to restock the well with people who have never known freedom and will take to their ways and commands.

I long ago stopped going to the movies, and these days I watch very little television, as most of the shows pretty much suck.  Although I will confess that I do watch both Game of Thrones and Black Sails.  I have very little tolerance for these holier-than-thou individuals who seem to think that just because they can act or sing or play some sport that that somehow makes them a better person than me.  No, all that it does is to make them a better actor, or singer or athlete.  And that’s all that it does.  It doesn’t make their opinion on any given subject any better than mine.  And when you stop to consider the fact that a significant percentage of these loons weren’t even smart enough to make it all the way through high school you come to the conclusion that anything they have to say on nearly any topic is all the more meaningless.  These clowns who have contributed absolutely nothing to society feel free to criticize a man who has employed thousands. 

THERE’S A VERY GOOD REASON HE’S CALLED ‘MEATHEAD’…

I’m quite sure that if you’re over the age of at least 18, or maybe a bit younger, you’ll know who I’m talking about when I say, “Meathead.”  What some may not know is that the actor who played the part, Rob Reiner, was essentially doing nothing more than to play himself.  Reiner is, as was the character he played, pretty much of a hardcore lefty.  So it should come as a surprise to no one that he’s not a big supporter of Donald Trump nor, apparently, of those who support Trump.

Reiner says that it’s impossible to level with the Republican presidential nominee’s bigoted supporters, who are “mostly white males who don’t have college degrees.”   And so it was in a recent interview with ‘The Hollywood Reporter’ (THR), that Reiner said there’s “a very serious strain of racism” that runs through those supporting the Republican presidential nominee.  How often can you call someone a racist such a label becomes completely meaningless?

Anyway, Reiner went on to say, “And that’s a kind of disturbing thing, and I don’t think you ever reach those people. I think that they’re impossible to turn around. It’s very disturbing because a lot of these racist ideas have kind of been dormant for a while, and he’s given voice to them — he’s kind of unearthed it. And the thing that’s most disturbing is to discover that there’s so many people that still hold those views.”  And what views might those be exactly? 

Reiner then goes on to suggest that Trump supporters feel “threatened” by America’s racial diversity.  He said, “If it isn’t overt racism, it’s this kind of a desperate attempt at holding on to some version of America that they think was there once. They’re really threatened by our diversity, and what’s so great about the experiment of democracy is that it celebrates diversity and diversity is what makes it strong.”  What I personally feel threatened by, is our out of control government!

But this line of attack from Reiner is really nothing new for this hapless clown. The Hollywood buffoon has been bashing Trump supporters for quite some time now.  It was just last month that Reiner appeared on CNN Tonight and said the real danger in Trump’s words are that his followers “have a violent nature, and a violent streak.”  The former ‘All in the Family’ star’s disdain for Trump supporters is, however, rivaled only by his outright hatred for the White House hopeful himself.

You see, it was in an appearance on MSNBC back in July that Reiner dared to call Trump “the single most unqualified person ever to run for president in my lifetime.”  Reiner, who also told THR that the iconic character Archie Bunker would be a Trump supporter, is an enthusiastic supporter of Trump’s Democrat rival in the 2016 race.  But the actual truth of the matter is that it’s the guy now occupying the Oval Office who is the single most unqualified person to ever run for, and to win, the presidency.

Reiner went on to say, “I’ve known Hillary Clinton almost 25 years, and she’s incredibly dedicated and passionate about wanting to make things better and wanting to move thing forward.”  And he added, “She’s a real policy wonk. She can work across the aisle. She’s good at it. Once she has a job, Republicans like her because she does listen and figures out ways to forge consensus.”  No, reason any Republicans may ‘like’ her is because she supports the status quo, and so do they.

Reiner said it’s his “dream that she wins the White House,” and also admitted that “it may just be pie-in-the sky, but that’s my hope.”  I would argue that if that’s the case then it would seem to me his dream is little more than a nightmare scenario to those of us little people who still love our freedom, or what freedom we still have.  God forbid that Hitlery is ever elected, because there is every reason to believe that our country simply would never survive her.   

And when asked if there’s anything that could keep Hitlery from winning in November, Reiner said, “The only thing I could think of is some Julian Assange thing,” referencing the WikiLeaks founder, whose infamous non-profit publisher of corporate and secret government documents recently released scores of emails that embarrassed the Democratic National Committee and resulted in the resignation of former DNC Chair Debbie Wizzerman-Schultz.

The real hypocrisy here is how the ‘Left’ chides us all for being pissed off when, instead, it was the ‘Left’ who introduced us to the Communists and the Union Organizers who turned out to be KGB Agents.  It was the Left who introduced Fabian Socialism, gave us the never properly ratified 16th Amendment, took us off the Gold standard and allowed the IRS to conduct business in the Continental US.  Prior to 1933 the IRS was barred by law from conducting it's unseemly business in the USA.

Let’s face it, Reiner is really nothing more than another poor-little-rich-boy who was born with a silver spoon in his mouth.  And he, like the vast majority of those on the left, hasn't got a clue about the real world.  He'll always have a wall around his home to keep out the criminals and the illegals. Reiner is just as stupid and moronic as was the character he played on television back in the 70s.  He shed the bad wig from back in those days and has now become what is a real life 'Meathead' communist.

And I’d like to ask ‘Meathead’, since he’s so smart and all, what’s the minimum wage in Mexico?  It’s 65.1 Pesos Zone B or 70.1 Pesos Zone A, or roughly 4 bucks a day.  So I’m kind of curious when it might have been that either he or his dream candidate, Hitlery, or any other of his so-called educated friends, have ever complained to the hard leftist corrupt presidents of Mexico about raising THEIR minimum wage?   Or when have his friends in LA Rasa ever even attempted to do so?

I’m pretty sure that that would be, Never!  So he wants uneducated Americans to make $15 an hour, or 30 times the $4 they make a day in Mexico, while he lectures people in America on racism?   He might want to tend to that log in his eye, then he might more clearly see the speck in Trump’s.  The irony is Trump wants FAIR trade.  So Trump in closing the border and stopping Mexico will end the slave labor in Mexico whose corrupt leftist government will have to look to its own poor!

Part of the problem today is that the term "higher education" has, unfortunately, now been reduced to being little more than an oxymoron.  Because no longer is anything actually taught that even remotely approaches constitutional history, citizenship, literature, or any other subject, without not only a hardcore leftist slant, but a total devotion to the left.  The end result is a generation who ends up thinking just like this boob, Reiner.  And it doesn’t bode well for our country’s future.

THE ‘INCREDIBLY SPACEY’, MR. KEVIN SPACEY…

Well it would seem that we have yet another Hollywood luminaries who is not partial to Donald Trump.  This time it’s Kevin Spacey, who plays President Frank Underwood on House of Cards, who has now offered his opinion of the 2016 presidential race.  And it’s according to Spacey that Donald Trump’s campaign reminds him of George Wallace’s independent campaign in 1968.  Apparently Spacy was interested in politics at an early age, as he was the ripe old age of 9 when Wallace represented the American Independent Party in the 1968 presidential race.  Of course Spacey fails to mention that Wallace ran for the nomination of Spacey’s own Democrat Party in 1964, 1972 and again in 1976.

In making his idiotic comments Spacey said, “I mean, Frank Underwood would look at this particular year and find it as amusing as I do. At the end of the day, the United States has time and again — despite sometimes when we think there’s some crazy shit going down — we generally get it right eventually.” He compared Trump’s campaign to Wallace’s, saying, “It’s exactly the same campaign. I mean, exactly the same.”  Now since I doubt very much that as a 9 year old Spacey was paying much attention to presidential politics I can only guess that the basis for this comparison of his comes from sources other than memory.  Sources that are, most likely, extremely left-leaning in their politics.

This is far from being the first time that Spacey has made his dislike of Trump public.  Last September, in an appearance on the Communist News Network (CNN) it was Dana Bash who then asked him how ‘Underwood’ would beat Donald Trump in the 2016 election, Spacey replied, “He would kill Donald Trump. That’s number one. Trump would never make it to Election Day. Done. Over.”  Now is that really the sort of ‘intelligent’ response that one would expect to hear from someone who wishes to have their opinions taken seriously?  And yet these imbeciles, like Spacey, demand that the American people pay attention to what it is they have to say.  They’re nuts!!

And ya know, I’m sure it goes without saying, Spacey has always been known as being a big supporter of Barry “Almighty”.  It was back in July 2013, that he gushed, “President Obama will go down as having passed some of the most historic bills in the history of this country. That despite constant knee-jerk opposition from the Republicans. A lot of people don’t realize how much he’s done in the most difficult circumstances.”  That the legislation that has been passed during Barry’s tenure can be called ‘historic’ is not in dispute here.  But how much of that legislation has proven to be a benefit to the country and how much has proven to be a benefit to the Democrat Party?

But look, this has become the kind of gibberish that now passes for intelligent conversation whenever we have limousine liberals like Spacey offering up their idiotic opinions on the important issues for the day.  And it’s why most rational, patriotic Americans tend to ignore anything that these imbeciles might have to say.  Hollywood has always been home for communist sympathizers so, I suppose, it should come as no surprise that is remains, today, home for some of the most twisted, left-leaning and drugged out morons that you’ll find anywhere in the country, or anywhere on the planet for that matter.  People who, if they were to live anywhere else, would be penniless.  

GEORGE LOPEZ, JUST ANOTHER LEFTWING LOUDMOUTH…

I have never quite been able to figure out how it is that those who so proudly wear the moniker of ‘Liberal’ can come to so vehemently hate this country and all that it stands for.  What makes someone applaud efforts to tear down, eradicate, or simply have declared as being illegal the very institutions which form the very foundation of this once great and proud nation.  They have no problem with condoning all manner of bad behavior, no matter how illegal, or perverted it may be, and then accuse those of us who choose not to, of being intolerant.       

For instance, it was earlier this week during an interview that comedian, and I use the term very loosely because I’ve seen this guy’s act and he’s anything but funny, George Lopez described Donald Trump’s comments on illegal immigration as “vile”.  But I’m thinking that more than likely the reason Lopez didn’t like what Trump said had far more to do with the fact that it was a white guy who said it than with what was actually said.  Because Lopez has been saying derogatory things about Hispanics for years as part of idiotic standup routine.  

And now come reports that NBC’s top brass are said to be looking for a minority to replace Trump on the popular reality television show ‘Celebrity Apprentice’, a decision that was apparently made after Trump’s comments during his campaign announcement which ignited what has now become a media firestorm.  But let’s face it, as a candidate Trump wasn’t going to be able to do the show anyway.  And who is better than Trump at being Trump?  That would be ‘No One.’  And if it’s Lopez that’s being considered as a replacement, lots of luck!

It was during the aforementioned interview done with ‘TMZ’ that Lopez said, “Listen, those (Trump’s) comments are vile in any civilized society, but there’s a freedom of speech.”  And he went on to say, “I know him, I don’t particularly like what he’s saying, but there is a right to say that.”  Well at least he got that part right, but I’m sure it was nothing more than a slip of the tongue.  Because usually freedom of speech is the first to go whenever one is taking on one for the issues most favored by those on the left.  You must agree or be called a bigot.   

Lopez said that he plans on boycotting Trump’s golf course, though he conceded that it probably won’t affect Trump’s bottom line.  Ya, I bet that’ll bring a tear to ‘The Donald’s’ one good eye.  NOT!  Lopez also went on to say that he thinks Trump could get elected, and predicted what Latinos might do if that were to actually happen, and that would be for all them to just leave.  Sorry George, but I’m just not seeing a down side to that, and somehow I think this country could go on.  So in other words, don’t let the door hit you in the ass on the way out. 

“Yeah, sure, [he has a chance],” Lopez told TMZ. “There’s enough racists in this country for him to get elected.”  Lopez jokingly ended the brief interview saying, “Trump in 2016.”  He added, “If he wins, he won’t have to worry about immigration, we’ll all go back.”  We should be so lucky!  But where else does Lopez think he could go and make the amount of money that he makes in America.  And yet he so disrespects this country.  And let’s be honest here, it doesn’t take much brainpower to be a standup comic.  Lopez proves that point every time he opens his mouth.

Liberals like Lopez see absolutely nothing wrong with allowing those who are in this country illegally to ignore our laws.  And they also seem not to be bothered in the least when these individuals, again who are in this country illegally, murder and rape Americans.  Perhaps if it had been this moron’s daughter who had recently been murdered by an illegal scum his opinion might be different.  Although I seriously doubt it.  Liberals just don’t look at things the way normal people do.  We are supposed to be nation of laws, but liberals don’t see it that way.

And so it would seem that those on the left, those who agree with Mr. Lopez, are winning, or may even have already won, the battle for the soul of America.  And I think we can also all safely come to agree on the fact that it has been the presidency of one Barack Hussein Obama that has provided much assistance in that endeavor. And, again, all too sadly at the expense of the rule of law.  And it has been those on the left who view such a consequence as being insignificant and as a necessary, even integral, part of the entire ‘transformation’ process.    

MICHAEL MOORE, A PATHETIC LOSER OF THE VERY HIGHEST ORDER…

I’m sure it will come as a surprise to virtually no one that Michael Moore, that rather infamous leftwing lard-ass, is no fan of the new movie, "American Sniper."  And it’s according to this over-weight reject from a fat farm that men such as Chris Kyle are not to be regarded as heroes, because, says Moore, they are essentially nothing more than cowards.  Now keep in mind here that such an opinion comes from the same guy who looks upon Castro as his hero and who was also a big fan of Hugo Chavez.

It was over this past weekend that Moore took to Twitter to vent.  And it was in so doing that he proceeded to, as only he can, take a number of what were a number of rather sophomoric potshots at the acclaim now being heaped upon the Clint Eastwood film, "American Sniper," starring Bradley Cooper.  The movie is based on the true story of Navy SEAL Chris Kyle, a Special Forces sharpshooter, who was credited with 160 confirmed kills, which was reported to be the most in U.S. military history.

Over the year Moore has received some degree of notoriety for making rabid left-wing films.  He tweeted to the over 1.7 million imbeciles who follow him: "My uncle killed by sniper in WW2. We were taught snipers were cowards. Will shoot u in the back. Snipers aren't heroes. And invaders r worse."  This is another example where those on the left reveal just how much it is that they hate this country and loath our military.  So slander those who defend this country is the lowest of lows.   

Eastwood's movie has won both popular and critical acclaim and has been nominated for six Oscars.  And while the liberal New York Times was perhaps a little less blunt than Moore, it still could not quite bring itself to heap any level of actual praise on either the movie or the man that it was about.  They did manage to give the film a generally sympathetic review, albeit with one odd caveat, placing it in the context of "Eastwood's commitment to the themes of vengeance and justice in a fallen world."

The truth of matter is that Kyle's actions are believed to have saved the lives of hundreds of U.S. service members. Service members’ whose lives, I’m quite sure, that Moore would have preferred not to have been saved.  The film is broadly based on Kyle's bestselling 2012 autobiography, which is also the story of the trauma he suffered as a result of the war in Iraq.  In February 2013, Kyle was murdered by Eddie Ray Routh, a soldier suffering from post-traumatic stress whom Kyle had befriended.

As many you are most likely very aware, Moore has made millions on his rather unique approach to cinematography.  His movies are essentially nothing more than pure unadulterated leftwing drivel that equates to mindless propaganda.  One of his movies, Fahrenheit 9/11, was released in 2004 and portrayed the George W. Bush administration as having manipulated the aftermath of the 9/11 Islamist attacks on the U.S. to further its greed-driven agenda for wars in Afghanistan and Iraq.

Other examples of Moore's cinematographic prowess are his Oscar-winning 2002 documentary, "Bowling For Columbine," which was his blatantly deceptive depiction regarding gun violence in America and also served as being part of his ongoing campaign against firearms.  In 2007 another one of his films, Sicko, presented viewers with his rather twisted perception of healthcare here in America.  And then in 2009 he released another movie, this one was titled, Capitalism: A Love Story.

Moore is a big Obama supporter, so it was no surprise the ‘Capitalism’ had as its subject the late-2000s financial crisis and the U.S. economy during the transition between the incoming Barry ‘O’ and the outgoing ‘W’. Addressing a press conference at its release, Moore said, "Democracy is not a spectator sport, it's a participatory event. If we don't participate in it, it ceases to be a democracy. So Obama will rise or fall based not so much on what he does but on what we do to support him.”

In watching any of the movies that Moore had made, it becomes pretty obvious, pretty quickly that he rarely worries about getting the facts right.  His record for accuracy is far from what one might be referred to as being stellar. His documentary, "Fahrenheit 9/11," contained over 50 instances, both within the movie itself and in representations made about it during the films promotion, that bore absolutely no resemblance to the facts as they related to the subject matter of his film.   

But look, I feel pretty confident in say that we can expect much more harsh criticism to be thrown at Eastwood’s film as the negative leftist reaction to sure to continue to ramp up. The popularity of "American Sniper" is sure to send more of them over the edge in the coming weeks and days. And I’m sure that before too long we can also expect to be subjected to passive-aggressive versions of such sentiments to make their way into state-controlled media reports.  So be prepared.

‘SELMA’…MORE REVISIONIST HISTORY FROM HOLLYWOOD???

And so here we have another one of those movies which I have no intention of spending any of my hard-earned money on.  For me, the sole purpose for going to the movies, on those rare occasions when I can be convinced to do such a thing, is to be entertained. It’s not to be lectured to, or to be taught some sort of lesson that the maker of the movie thinks I should be taught.  And it’s not to be subjected to some twisted Hollywood version of past events such as this one.

The movie to which I refer is “Selma”.  This supposed widely acclaimed example cinematography which, or so we are told, is about the 1965 Civil Rights movement.  But it seems that there are those who are not fans of movie is, those who were present at the time these events actually took place.  It seems that Hollywood’s version of this time in our history disappointed at least one moviegoer, none other than a leading historian of president Lyndon Johnson.

And just who it that was less than impressed with this latest attempt of revisionist history?  Well, none other than the director of the LBJ Presidential Library in Austin, which hosted a major civil rights summit earlier this year and that was headlined by four U.S. presidents, who apparently thinks that the film which opened on Christmas Day incorrectly portrays Johnson as being somewhat of an obstructionist to the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. 

As I mentioned earlier, "Selma" is supposedly based on the 1965 marches from the Alabama cities of Selma to Montgomery that were led by Dr. King.  It was during a time that marchers were calling for voting rights.  As is usually the case, it’s always a good idea to take movies such as this with a grain of salt, realizing that there is little historical fact contained.  Sadly though, there those who take such movies as being an accurate portrayal of events as they occurred.

It is in this particular instance that we have LBJ Library Director Mark Updegrove who has now made the claim that the film unfairly casts Johnson as a sort of composite character who represents many of the obstacles blacks faced in getting civil rights laws passed. What history shows, at least according to Mr. Updegrove, is that Johnson and King had a partnership.  He said Johnson and King did have disagreements, but not like the film suggests.

Updegrove called the portrayal unfortunate given the current racial climate following the deaths of two unarmed black men at the hands of police.  He said, "When racial tension is so high, it does no good to suggest that the president of the U.S. himself stood in the way of progress a half-century ago. It flies in the face of history."  Actually, what actually flies in the face of history may just be the claims made by Mr. Updegrove that Johnson was anything but a racist.

A spokes’moron’ for Paramount Pictures, the studio that released the film, did not immediately return messages for comment Wednesday.  "Selma" has apparently been nominated for four Golden Globe awards, including best picture for a drama and best director.  But with the entertainment industry being what it is, and pretty deeply rooted in political correctness, that most likely has much more to do with it subject matter than it does with anything else.

Back in April, it was Updegrove and the LBJ Library that commemorated the 50th anniversary of the Civil Rights Act with a summit that included appearances by four of the five living U.S. presidents. And it was Barry “Almighty” that closed out the event with a speech that lauded Johnson's congressional deal-making and push for greater racial equality.  But for a commemoration to take place in such a venue has since seemed a bit ironic to me.

While there are those who may take exception to the way the movie portrays Johnson, what history does show us is that, like the majority of those in his party, the Democrat Party, then as now, he was a pretty devout racist.  And what seems to have been long forgotten is the fact that had it not been for a sizable majority of congressional Republicans, the Civil Rights Act, that today’s Democrats very loudly take credit for, would never have been passed.

‘HANOI JANE’ FONDA…SENILE OLD CRACKPOT…

And demonstrating the fact that leftwing loony-ism is really nothing new to Hollywood, we have that leftwing nut from the older generation in the person of ‘Hanoi Jane’ Fonda. Apparently Fonda recently revealed more details of her mother's troubled life. She claims to have discovered that her mother had been sexually abused from a young age and had nine abortions before giving birth to the actress. Too bad dear old mom didn’t make it an even ten!

These supposed new details come to us by way of a report on a recent speech that Fonda is said to have made at a fundraising event in Beverly Hills for a charity benefiting the victims of rape. The 76-year-old moon-bat said she discovered the abuse after recently reading her mother's medical records. Now we have no way to determine if there’s any truth to what Fonda claims, but her reputation as liar is sufficient to call into question anything she says.

According to the reports, Fonda said, "The minute I read that, everything fell into place." She then went on to say, "I knew [the reason for] the promiscuity, the endless plastic surgery, the guilt, the inability to love or be intimate, and I was able to forgive her and forgive myself." Fonda also told friends she believes that it was a piano tuner, of all people, who sexually abused her mother, Frances, who suffered from bipolar disorder and ultimately committed suicide.

Look, there is really very little that a leftwing kook like Fonda won’t say in an effort to advance whatever leftwing cause it is that she claims to support. You can never believe anything that people like her say because, more than likely, they’ve simply made it all up. And I’m quite sure Fonda feels very justified in, and not the least bit hesitant about, using her dead mother as long as she thinks that she might persuade even one person to support her idiotic cause.

PALTROW MUST BE VYING FOR DUMBEST BITCH ON THE PLANET!!!

Gwyneth Paltrow, the brain-dead bimbo who chose to name one of her kids after a fruit and the other after a major player in the Bible, a book which I’m quite sure she knows very little about, has once again made quite clear the fact that very little intelligence is actually required for one to be able to excel in her chosen profession. A profession in which, if you’ve ever seen any of her movies, she would have never made it very far were it not for her mommy and daddy.

Anyway, it was Ms. Paltrow who played host to a fundraiser this past Thursday, attended by her favorite little stud-muffin, Barry "Almighty" and she was apparently quite flustered by merely being in his presence. It was in introducing our Liar-in-Chief that she said, "You're so handsome that I can't speak properly." Obviously it doesn’t take much to get the old girl all worked up. Either that or it’s been a while since she’s managed to get herself laid.

According to reports of the event there were several hundred of like-minded folks in attendence there in the lush backyard of her home there in the movie star haven, Brentwood. In a not-so-subtle reference to what she called her "conscious uncoupling" earlier this year from then husband Chris Martin, Paltrow said it was a "profound honor" to have Barry in the home she shares with Apple and Moses, her two children by he with whom she recently uncoupled.

Paltrow hosted this little reception and dinner benefiting the Democrat Party which also marked the start of a three-day, California fundraising swing for Barry "Almighty." After all, what else has Barry got to do these days, other than fundraise? Fundraising is far more important than dealing with ISIS or Ebola. He’s scheduled to attend three other Democrat National Committee fundraisers in Los Angeles and San Francisco before returning to Washington on Saturday.

Tickets to the reception at Paltrow's home started at $1,000, while dinner tickets cost a minimum of $15,000. That washed-up old hag of an actress, Julia Roberts, was in attendence as was someone by the name of Bradley Whitford, who I presume must be an actor of some sort or another. In a brief introduction punctuated by "ums," Paltrow declared herself to be one of Barry's biggest fans and said he's an "incredible role model." Role model?

And what must have been an effort to make herself look as stupid as possible, which is really nothing new for this moron, she said, "I am one of your biggest fans, if not the biggest, and have been since the inception of your campaign." And she went on to say that she thinks both of his campaigns and his presidency will be one of the most important and most scrutinized of all time. Of that there is little doubt, as he is easily the most corrupt individual to ever hold his office.

Paltrow noted the approaching Nov. 4 midterm elections in which Democratic control of the Senate is at risk. She called it a "critical time" for Democrats and seemed to urge everyone to vote. And then in making a statement that prove, and better that I ever could, that she is, without a doubt, one of the dumbest things walking on two lets, she said, "It would be wonderful if we were able to give this man all of the power that he needs to pass the things that he needs to pass."

She also went on to mention equal rights for women in the workplace, and investments in sustainable energy and "everything green." I’m curious if she happened to ask Barry why it is that he insists upon paying the women who work for him much less than the he pays the men who do. But then I doubt that that topic ever came up in conversation. And by declaring her support for "everything green" I’m assuming the attendees to her little soiree arrived by means other than a limousine?

But look, it’s imbeciles like Paltrow and her many liberal Hollywood buddies, folks that have never had to work a day in their life, who are really Barry’s kind of people. Because it’s these folks with whom Barry has much in common. He too has never had to work for a living. And while he may be black, he cares little about the plight of average blacks. To Barry, as well as the entire Democrat Party, blacks are seen as being nothing more than group to be exploited. But blacks have been, and continue to be, too stupid to figure that out.

A GATHERING OF LUNATICS…

AN ENVIRONMENTALIST WACKO AND HIS YACHT

Fresh off his designation as the U.N.’s "Messenger of Peace", whatever the Hell that is, everybody’s favorite Hollywood douche bag, Leo De-Cap-Rio, recently picked up another award, this past Sunday, and it was one for his supposed hard work and dedication toward addressing a problem that, as of yet, hasn’t even been proven to exist. That problem is, of course, the issue of climate change. The award to which I refer is the supposedly ‘prestigious’ ‘Slick Willie’ Clinton Global Citizen Award. How tough can it be to win award for working to prevent that which doesn’t even exist?

De-Cap is someone who, or so we’re supposed to believe, has focused his philanthropic efforts on protecting and preserving good old planet Earth. And to prove to all in attendance that he was worthy of his award, he urged those in attendance at Sunday night's little gala to work to address what he referred to as being "a real and terrifying crisis." In accepting this rather meaningless award, De-Cap went on to say, "Climate change is compromising the very livability of our planet." I’m curious though, on what exactly does this boob base this nutty claim of his? I mean it can’t be on any actual science.

De-Cap said, "less than three percent of all philanthropic giving goes toward protecting and preserving our environment," a statistic he called "ridiculous," with even less going toward protecting the world's oceans. He urged the audience of global leaders and philanthropists "to put environmental issues at the forefront of the human agenda." He added, "Together we can find ways to scale up funding and create intelligent partnerships. By protecting our oceans and our wild lands we allow species to recover, local communities to thrive and ultimately maintain a stable climate for all life on Earth."

Earlier in the day Leo participated in something called the People's Climate Change march. He said, "the world is now at a turning point, and climate change is the defining issue of our time.… The task before us to protect this planet will require the largest movement in human history. It will have to cross all cultural, religious and political boundaries. But the good news is the solutions are ready, and with leaders like the ones in this room who do not shrink in the face of crisis. They can rise, they can inspire and they can contribute. And that truly is the best hope of planet Earth."

Joining De-Cap at this gathering of some of the most bizarre people on the planet were, of course, several other Hollywood loons. This list of leftwing luminaries included presenter Eva Longoria, who honored the subjects of her upcoming documentary, ‘Food Chains’; the host Seth Meyers; music director Randy Jackson; performers Aloe Blacc, Jason Mraz and The Roots; Brian Grazer; Sting and Trudie Styler; and Idris Elba. And of course ex-president ‘BJ’ Clinton was in attendance joined by his ‘wife’, and presidential wanna be, Hitlery along with product of this bizarre little union, daughter Chelsea.

It was later on in the ceremony, that we had another Hollywood loser, actress/activist Eva Longoria, who presented one of the leadership in civil society awards to Greg Asbed and Lucas Benitez, co-founders of the Coalition of Immokalee Workers, an organization that works to end the exploitation of farm workers and the group that is the focus of her upcoming documentary Food Chains, set to be released on Nov. 21. Yup, I’m sure that’ll be packing in the crowds. NOT! She, like so many others in her ‘profession’ is obviously another one of those who’s a legend in her own mind.

These ‘do as I say and not as I do’ Hollywood liberals actually see themselves as being someone who the rest of us should be listening to. They travel around in their big limousines and fly around in their private jets and still feel that they are able to lecture the rest of us about where it is that we keep our thermostats, or about the kinds of cars that we like to drive or about how fossil fuels are evil. And though they see themselves as being just so much smarter than the rest of us, it’s very few of these geniuses who were able to successfully navigate any grade beyond the 6th grade. Most possess an IQ lower than their shoe size.

And something that I have always had a very difficult time trying to figure out is, why is it that they so hate the very country that made it possible for them to become so wealthy, by doing something so insignificant as ‘acting’. I mean let’s be honest, it’s not like acting requires the same intelligence as, say, being a brain surgeon. They’re really quite pathetic. They have no background in science and thus are simply incapable of determining whether or not they’re being lied to. But it matters very little to them, because all they’re really in search of is a cause. And it matters not whether it’s based on something real, or imagined.

And what REALLY pisses me off is how hypocritical little creeps like De-Cap-Rio get to live the lifestyle to which they have become accustomed while it’s only the rest of us, we the little people, who MUST keep our thermostats at 68 and drive around in Smart Cars. Otherwise, or so we are told, we’re causing the planet to be doomed. Let’s face it, if the climate is changing, which I very much doubt, why is it that it’s just we the little people who are causing that change to take place? That’s why this is all just so much bullshit. What’s behind it, again ‘IF’ it is taking place at all, is Mother Nature herself. The Earth warms and cools in a natural cycle.

THE LEGEND OF ’MEATHEAD’ CONTINUES…

I suppose there’s always been a bit of leftward slant in Hollywood. I’ve read some stories about how many of the old-time movie stars that I enjoyed watching at one time or another flirted with communism, either by attending certain gatherings or by actual affiliation with the party. But back then it seemed that they were outnumbered by those who came across as possessing a love of country, with some going as far as to play an active role in WW II.

But it was somewhere along the way that the patriots came to be outnumbered by the communists. Well, maybe communist is a bit extreme, but to say the least, those who love their country, at least as it was initially intended, have most certainly come to be outnumbered by those who definitely do not. I have never really understood why these folks who have been so blessed can bring themselves to spew such vile language whenever talking about America.

Now one of those loudmouths is the very same individual who Archie Bunker, from the old ‘All In The Family’ TV show, once routinely referred to as ‘Meathead’. And in looking back Archie could not have been more right in the way he chose to describe the moron who would one day come to prove himself to be much more than simply a ‘Meathead’. This goof should be considered as being the poster child for Hollywood kooks.

Because it was that this supposed big-time Hollywood director, and well known leftwing kook, Rob Reiner, who in spewing his typical leftwing drivel, told talk-show host Larry ‘The Fossil’ King that the Tea Party is like the terrorist group Hamas. Because, according to ‘Meathad’, apparently both groups are extreme and cannot be negotiated with, and the only solution is to make them go away or "eliminate" them. Really??

According to this fat slob of a Hollywood imbecile, "[Y]ou can’t negotiate with that, you have to say either Hamas goes away and the Palestinian authority takes over all that region and deal with some kind of honest broker here, and create the two-state solution." You know, these Hollywood types never cease to amaze me. Most have an IQ somewhere in the single digits and yet they perceive themselves as being someone worthy of being listened to.

And in his own demented little way, he attempted to draw some sort of a parallel with the Tea Party. He said, "anytime you’re dealing with an extreme group, you cannot negotiate with them, and the way to do it is to eliminate it. With the Tea Party, you have to go through political thing, you have to wait till 2020 to redistrict, but that is really tough stuff." Personally speaking, to me it’s the clones like ‘Meathead’ and his many Hollywood friends who are the extreme ones.

Anyway, it was on the August 14 edition of Politicking with Larry King, the host asked ‘Meathead’, "What’s to do about the Gaza situation, and Israel?" To which ‘Meathead’ responded by saying, "Well, there again, you’ve got a horrible situation where you have an extreme faction, the Hamas, that controls Gaza, that is written into their playbook, the destruction of Israel, the destruction of every Jew on the planet."

‘Meathead’ went on to say, "The Palestinians turned down the ability to have their own state in 1948 when Israel was formed, so clearly, Hamas, and again, the virulent faction of a, really, uh, group can control everything." And it was up to this point that I was kind of in agreement with some of what he was saying. But then, and in typical liberal kook fashion, things then veered off to the left and once again he began making no sense whatsoever.

Because ‘Meathead’ continued, "You look at the Congress right now in the United States, you’ve got a strong Tea Party group controlling the whole country, because they have a gridlock, they have a gridlock, stranglehold on Boehner. Boehner can’t make a move, and so for that reason, nothing gets brought up in the Congress." I’m thinking old ‘Meathead’ spends way too much time being tuned in to MSNBC or between the pages of The New York Times.

‘Meathead’ continued his rant saying, "So anytime you’re dealing with an extreme group, you cannot negotiate with them, and they way to do it is to eliminate it." To which he added, "With the Tea Party, you have to go through a political thing, you have to wait till 2020 to redistrict, but, uh, that is really tough stuff." I’m reminded of that quote of Mark Twain’s, "It’s better to keep your mouth shut and appear stupid than to open it and remove all doubt."

The U.S. State Department designated Hamas a terrorist organization in 1997. The Tea Party stands for Taxed Enough Already and the movement sprang up from the American grassroots in 2010 largely in opposition to Obamacare, and has broadened since then to include issues such limited government, fewer government regulations, and adherence to the Constitution. So ‘Meathead’s’ idiotic comments say much more about him than about the Tea Party.

Let’s face it, this guy is far from being anyone who can be said to be a master of his craft. The last time old ‘Meathead’ was even nominated for an Academy Award was 22 years ago when he was nominated for the Best Picture Academy Award for the 1992 film, A Few Good Men. Which to my way of thinking makes him little more than some one hit wonder. And yet he feels that he is apparently someone worth listening to when in reality he’s anything but.

ROB LOWE, A LITTLE LESS OF A LIBERAL LOON…

It’s not very often, one might even say it’s pretty darn rare, that I ever find myself siding, even in the slightest, with someone from Hollywood. And it’s stranger still that it would be with someone who once was proud to refer to himself as being a really liberal Democrat. But these days it’s Rob Lowe who sounds much more like a Libertarian as he recently took it upon himself to declare, in a New York Times interview, that government should stay out of "almost everything."

But when it comes to any of these Hollywood-types, I’m always more than a little leery in believing just about anything that they might choose to say. Anyway, it was while promoting his second autobiography "Love Life," that the now 50-year-old actor compared loyalty to a political party to recreational drug use. "I find them both highly overrated," he said. "Each day another state makes it OK for my 18-year-old, any 18-year-old, to go and buy pot like he's buying a Pepsi-Cola."

He said, "And so let's face it, in the United States, recreational drug use is sort of acceptable. Belonging to one party is acceptable. But my days of just ticking the party box are long over. I judge the candidates for who they are." Adding, "My thing is personal freedoms, freedoms for the individual to love whom they want, do with what they want. In fact, I want the government out of almost everything." Here’s where I tend to part ways with Lowe, as I’m not a supporter of gay marriage.

Lowe knows little about politics, unless of course you care to count his time playing a Democrat speechwriter in that rather idiotic little show, "The West Wing," or a Republican senator on "Brothers and Sisters," or a city manager on "Parks and Recreation," and even John F. Kennedy in "Killing Kennedy." Now most of those out there in Lowe’s neck of the woods would see his having played such characters sufficient to be called political experience. I would have to disagree.

In 2009, the Daily Caller quoted Lowe as saying that he was once "a really, really liberal Democrat." But since getting married and having children, he say that he’s now more of "an independent moderate." While that may be how he views himself, I’d still have to say that some of his positions, while he claims to favor less government involvement in the private lives of Americans, still tilt, for what appear to be for the most part, to the left. So my agreement with him only goes so far.

I’m sure some may recall how it was that back in 1988, Lowe proved just how much of a liberal Democrat he really was. It was while attending the Democrat convention in Atlanta, that he was involved in a sex tape scandal involving two women, one of whom was underage. So I guess while one could say that over the course of the last 26 years Lowe has become a little less extreme in his views to the point where I find myself in agreement with some, he’s still more liberal than not.

HARVEY WEINSTEIN TO TAKE ON THE NRA?

Apparently that derelict-lookin douchebag and supposed big time movie producer, Harvey Weinstein, has now gone out and made it official. He says that he will soon be making what he described as a full feature drama, the intent of which will be to try to destroy the National Rifle Association (NRA). Apparently he’s another one of those who are of the opinion that it’s time for the NRA to be put out of business after having now been around for over 142 years. Guess he figures that’s long enough. However, I doubt very many of those outside of his rather peculiar political persuasion will agree with his take on things.

So this fat slob made his big announcement on Howard Stern’s radio show. During the interview, which took place on Wednesday, Stern asked Weinstein if he owned a gun. This reject from the ranks of greasy strip club bouncers replied that he did not and never would. "I don’t think we need guns in this country. And I hate it," the producer said. "I think the NRA is a disaster area." Maybe the better question would have been for Stern to ask how many heavily armed goons is it that this hypocritical jerk might have around him at any one time? I’d be willing to bet that it’s more that a few. After all, he’s such an important guy.

Weinstein went on to further reveal that his very secret project is about the gun rights group. "I shouldn’t say this, but I’ll tell it to you, Howard," he said. "I’m going to make a movie with Meryl Streep, and we’re going to take this head-on. And they’re going to wish they weren’t alive after I’m done with them." The shock jock then asked whether the film was going to be a documentary. And I guess not wanting to be viewed as just another Michael Moore, Weinstein said no, that it would be a "big movie like a ‘Mr. Smith Goes to Washington.’" I thought that was a rather bizarre sort of comparison. But hey, go figure.

Anyway, Weinstein said his vision would be to try to scare people away from firearms. He foresees moviegoers to leave thinking, "Gun stocks — I don’t want to be involved in that stuff. It’s going to be like crash and burn." Now seriously folks, with the level of violence being what it is in just about every movie that comes out these days, just how does this moron intend to scare people away from firearms and gun stocks? I don’t get how, by simply seeing some stupid movie, that folks who support the group can be turned against the freedom driven organization. Frankly, I see this as being a potential money maker for…the NRA.

Now I’m sure it will come as no surprise to anyone to find out that the esteemed Mr. Weinstein, chairman of the Weinstein Co. (formerly Miramax), happens to be one of Barry "Almighty’s" biggest fans as well as being one of his biggest fundraisers. He brought in more than $500,000 from his Hollywood friends for Barry’s re-election campaign and the Democrat National Committee in 2012. So once again we have another example of these Hollywood elites allowing their twisted politics to dictate the subject matter of their movies. Movies that most people have made it pretty clear that they have zero interest in going to watch.

The 5 million proud members of the NRA, of which I am one, are law-abiding Americans who are active in preserving the right to protect themselves and their families. Weinstein, being your typically brain-dead liberal, seems to think that guns are necessary for self-defense, but only in other countries, during genocides and if the weapon is not personally owned. Stern pointed out the inconsistencies in Weinstein’s earlier comments about a project about Jews defending themselves during the Holocaust. Weinstein replied that the justification for using a gun is "when you’re marching a half of a million people into Auschwitz."

But, as is usually the case with liberal simpletons like Weinstein, history isn’t their strong suit, and this scumbag is no exception as he seems to be completely unaware of the fact that the Nazis were able to confiscate the guns that the Jewish people owned based on Germany’s government registry. This idiot said he would have used a gun to stop from going to a concentration camp if he "found a gun, and if that was happening to my people." I’m thinking that old Harvey has been watching way too many movies if he thinks the good guys actually find fully loaded firearms in convenient locations to use only when needed.

Now look, I know I can’t be as smart as some big time Hollywood moviemaker, but I’m a little confused when it comes to trying to figure out just who is it that this freaking toad is expecting to spend their hard earned money on seeing this movie. Especially when your lead actress is some ugly looking old bowser like Streep. Of course, knowing Weinstein, I’m sure there’ll be plenty of nudity spread throughout, though thankfully I doubt that we’ll be subjected to having to look at Streep in the flesh. YUCK! Sorry for the visual there, folks. Just consider it as being one of those unintended consequences.

SEAN PENN, ALL THE BRAINS OF AN ICE CUBE…

IF ONLY THAT FINGER WAS LOADED

Ya know, I seem to have this continuing problem where I just can’t figure out how it is that a person who was able to do nothing more with their life than to become an actor, is still able to view themselves as being so much smarter than someone who was actually able to go out and actually make something of themselves. I mean let’s face, how much brainpower is actually required to be any kind of a professional entertainer? And since very few of these imbeciles were even able to successfully navigate all the way through a primary education, becoming an actor was, I suppose, the only option that was available to them.

Anyway, the only reason that I even bother to bring this up in the first place is because we recently had another one of these Hollywood morons with their over-inflated sense of importance, spouting off, as if what he had to say was actually worth listening to. Which it was not! In this case, it was the moron who has become the standard by which all other morons are measured, Sean Penn. Penn once again put one of typical displays of what it takes, these days, to be a know-nothing, America-hating, Hollywood celebrity. Penn’s right up there with that other little dirtbag, Matt ‘Douche Bag’ Damon. These guys are birds of a feather.

And in choosing to speak on a subject that I feel very confident that he most assuredly is very well versed in, Penn said, "There's a mental health problem in Congress." I thought it rather ironic that Penn, a longtime resident of that locale referred to as the land of the fruits, the nuts and the flakes, would bring up the same condition that he, as well as many others in his particular profession, also suffer from. And in making it quite plain just how warped he really is, Penn advocated that Barry could solve the whole problem "by committing them by executive order." At least that’s what this moron told CNN's ratings king, Piers Morgan on Monday night.

And when asked if he would have "people like Ted Cruz" committed, in what I’m not sure was an attempt at humor, sarcasm, or act of pure ignorance, Penn responded by saying, "He is my American brother. I won't -- I think we should take care of him, he is in, he's the trouble." Morgan then took things a step further, saying, "Well, actually have him committed." To which Penn said, "Yeah, I think it's a good idea." I would argue that there are far more folks in Hollywood, Penn included, that require setting up residence in a rubber room, than there are just about anywhere else on the planet, Congress included.

And then in what was a rambling sort of way, Penn identified what he called a "lack of education" as a "huge problem that we're dealing with in the country." Well that’s true, especially when it comes to uneducated boobs like himself. And in further demonstrating his ignorance, he said "But the thing you're talking about (tea party influence) and, and the way people's perception of political positions are, is a direct reaction to their lack of, of their education, which is a huge problem that we're dealing with in the country -- and between an uneducated people and the solipsism of people like Ted Cruz and their party."

And then he proceeded to spew even more of his idiotic drivel, saying, "It's a poisonous thing, and these things with what we talked about with, you know, this is why this period of time, this is one of the things that's so fascinating to me in Haiti. Here's this country with -- where we have it all, we have it all to make it great and we find ways from self-destructing and by, you know, saying nasty things about each other and being crazy and yet here's Haiti." Oddly enough, it’s jerks like himself, those big-government types, who are the ones who focus on creating and perpetuating new and improved methods of destructive behavior.

And Penn, I’m sure would disagree with the concept that it’s folks of his particular political persuasion, aka leftwing nutjobs, who have succeeded in making Haiti the perpetual cesspool of the Caribbean that it is. How much foreign aid money has been sent there that has only ended up being redirected to someone’s personal, offshore, bank account? But you see, for guys like Penn, that’s considered as being acceptable behavior. I mean, if you recall, old Sean, here, was a best buddy of that left thug, Hugo Chavez. You see in the upside down world of Penn, guys like Chavez have much more to offer their fellow man than do guys like Ted Cruz.

LEFT-WING LOON, ROBERT REDFORD CLAIMS THAT TO OPPOSE OBAMA, IS RACIST…

During a recent appearance on something called "New Day", which is a program that I guess airs on Wednesdays on the Communist News Network (CNN), Robert "Ain’t Aging Too Well’ Redford made the idiotic claim that all of the congressional criticism currently being aimed at Barry "Almighty" is motivated almost entirely by, yup you guessed it, race. So all of us white folks who just can’t bring ourselves to follow Barry down his socialist path, as he does his best to fundamentally transform our country, do so because we racists. Now I supposed that shouldn’t really come as all that much of a surprise, coming from someone like the old ‘Sundance Kid’ here. I guess we simply can’t disagree with Barry on the grounds that he working very hard to destroy our country, we can only disagree with him because he’s black. Who but a leftwing loon, like old Sundance, thinks that way?

So in demonstrating the level of ignorance, or the bizarre naiveté, that seems to inflict most of those out there in the land of the fruits, the nuts and the flakes, Sundance said, "Don’t get me started on that," when asked about political gridlock in Washington, D.C. "What I wanted to see [in Obama's second term] is turning out to be a bit of a dream that never came true. I don’t envy [Obama's] position. I think he is a good man. I think he is an intelligent man, a compassionate man who can’t function in that environment. That environment — it is so decrepit. It is so paralyzed. And the worst of it is that it is paralyzed by intention. There’s a body of congressional people that want to paralyze the system. I think that what’s underneath it, unfortunately, is there is probably some racism involved, which is really awful." These Hollywood types think they’ve got it all figured out.

"I don’t know whether it’s an elephant," Redford said. "It’s some kind of animal. Whatever it is, I think it’s in the room. But there are other issues there. It’s not just racism, I think. It’s a group of people that are afraid of change. And they’re so narrow-minded that some people, when you see change coming, get so threatened by change, they get angry and they get terrorized then they get vicious." I think most of can agree that change is, by no means, always a good thing. For anyone to look at the changes that have taken place in this country over the course of the last four years, and say they have made us better, would require a willing suspension of disbelief. No matter where you look, from the number of Americans who have been forced onto some sort of government subsistence to the massive reduction in the American workforce, America has been put on the road to ruin by Barry.

When asked if Barry’s troubles stem from the fact that he doesn’t "look like the norm," Redford, of course, was quick to agree. "Doesn’t look like the norm in their mind," he replied. "But I think just the idea of giving credit to this president — giving him credit for anything is abhorrent to them, so they’ll go against it. Never mind the better good of the people. Never mind that they’re supposed to be in office representing the interest of the public. They’re representing their own self-interest, which are very narrow and in some cases just bigoted." There has been absolutely nothing done in the last four years that can, in any way, be said to have improved the lives of anyone. Unless you are a member of the super-rich, your life today is very much worse than it was when he was first elected. You may not care to admit that fact, but it’s true. And his race has nothing to do with it.

So I beg to differ here with the esteemed Sundance Kid. When Barry first came into office he was presented with what was a very rare opportunity, and he was presented with two separate and distinct paths. One path would have had him using his race to bring people together regardless of their race and background. He could have followed the Constitution and thus create an environment that would have unleashed the economic engine that is unrivaled anywhere in the world. But instead, he chose to divide us by any means available. Not only along racial lines, but also by gender, by sexual orientation, political affiliation and by economic and social status. And once accomplished, he then did his best to set us fighting with one another, all for the sole purpose of diverting our attention away from what he, and his congressional allies, were doing to our country.

Of far more significance than Barry’s race is his apparent blind devotion to what is a failed political and economic theory, the natural result of which is an equal amount of misery for all but the power elite. Under such a system of government, any opportunity that presents the individual with the ability to become less dependent upon the government must be eliminated. The citizenry must become completely dependent, even subservient, to the all-powerful, all knowing and all seeing, government. It’s also under such a system that the rights of the individual come not from God but, instead, are dispensed by the government to those who it deems as being worthy and deserving. And they can be taken away just as quickly as they are granted. So Barry’s race has nothing, whatsoever, to do with why most people oppose him, it’s the fact that he’s a Socialist that they just can’t tolerate.