JIMMY CARTER FINALLY DEPARTS TO THE GREAT BEYOND, GOOD RIDDANCE!!!

Call me a cold-hearted bastard, if you wish, I really don’t care, but it’s whenever any Democrat who did, or attempted to do, damage to this country departs this world for the next that there should be cause for a great celebration. Such is how we should address the death of Jimmy Carter, our 39th President. The only good thing that can be said about him is, “That at least he wasn’t as stupid as our current *president.” It’s not much, but it’s something. But with that said, it did not make him any less of a threat to this country. Carter will go down as being the best of the three worst presidents, all Democrats, that this country has ever been made to endure.

At least he left this world comfortable in the knowledge that he was not the worst president in U.S. history, which, I’m sure, had to have been a concern of his. First to take that title from him was none other than ‘BO,’ but even he didn’t keep the title of being the worst for long. Nope, that title now goes to Joey. Carter was guilty of plenty of negligent behavior and bad stewardship, but I think he also underestimated the evil in the world. And while he may not have been the Antichrist, he most certainly was one of his henchmen. Carter traveled the world telling his foreign hosts how terrible America was. That alone should cause him not to be missed.

Carter wasn’t stupid, but he was, I think, terminally naïve and rather ignorant in the ways of the world. And I have no doubt that he could clearly see what his beloved Democrat Party had become over the years, and yet he chose to remain an ardent defender of what the party had become, commiserating with the most pedophilic, degenerate scum that the party possesses. And another thing, I find it rather difficult to reconcile his unchristian pro-abortion attitude with his long-held position of being a Sunday school teacher. Being pro-abortion is totally incongruous with being a Godly man. So I say, good riddance to this pathetic piece of shit.

And any of those familiar with the man knows that Carter was not a nice man at all and those who claim that he was, are nothing more than delusional. He was a vindictive, petty little man who managed to get himself elected on the tide of America’s long national nightmare of Richard Nixon and then Gerald Ford’s pardon. That more than anything, I think, is what got him elected. And let’s not forgot, that Carter was also a 2016 election denier. It’s sad, really, how so many people can so casually forget, or simply chose to ignore, that Carter said Donald Trump was an illegitimate president. And that President Trump was put into office by the Russians!

Carter even once went so as far as to suggest that if there was to be a full investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election ever conducted it would most certainly show that Donald Trump hadn’t actually won the presidency. This fraud was just one of many Democrats who tried to destroy America! Carter was proof positive that religious belief alone does not make you a good person, or even a ‘decent’ President. And make no mistake about it, Carter was as politically deranged as any other Leftist, he was just a bit more adept at controlling his crazy side. But still, there were those times when we got at least a glimpse of it.

And it’s whenever my now adult daughter expresses her concern when it comes to just how bad things are these days, I tell her about Jimmy Carter’s presidency. That rather dark time when interest rates were as high as 22 percent, the Saudi oil embargo that caused Americans to wait in line for hours just to buy ten gallons of gas, the humiliation of the Iranian Embassy hostage crisis and the botched rescue attempt, and the country's general “malaise” and so very much more. Thank God we had a strong, conservative leader in Ronald Reagan that was able to come in and correct a great many of the wrongs and reverse much of what Jimmy Carter had caused.

I remember counting the days that Americans were held hostage in Iran, his decision to give the Panama Canal away and his making a total mess out our energy situation. I see no reason to wax poetic about his incompetence. There are many parallels between Carter and Joey in the White House, but today, I’m not sure the American people are smart enough, or informed enough, to realize just how bad things have gotten under Joey. If we don’t discard him, and those like him, after only one term, America will never recover. Such are the perils of electing any Democrat. And yet we have those in this country who insist upon voting for these people.

Arguably, all our problems in the Middle East this century emanate from Carter’s blatant ineptitude. There is no question that the Shah of Iran was despised by a majority of his people, so his reign was going to end regardless. But Carter did nothing to maneuver it so that the Shahs replacement would at least be pro-Western and secular. Carter was your typical Democrat in that he never met a terrorist he didn’t like. And you know that the Mullahs of Iran will be eternally grateful to Carter as he is the only reason that they are in power today. So thanks, Jimmy, thanks a lot. And I have no doubt that they consider him to be some sort of national hero.

And Carter has routinely defended our current administration, Joey’s administration, this odd assortment of leftwing imbeciles that are even more incompetent, more corrupt, and more destructive to American values and to the Constitution than was his own presidency. Carter was just another dufus who, other than his time in the Navy, never worked a real job in his life, and he never accomplished anything positive for the American people or for the country. He was just another leftwing boob who came from a small state to become president.  Gee, where have I heard that before? The more things change, the more they seem to remain the same.

And I have no doubt that the world, today, would be a far better, and far safer, place had Carter never been president. Think about it, the damage he caused was reprehensible. Carter’s failed foreign policy made us the laughingstock of the world. He was viewed as weak and inept by our adversaries, in much the same manner that Joey is perceived by those same enemies today. And while we were somehow able to survive the Carter years, it was only because of the election of Ronald Reagan. Perhaps that’s what drives the attempt by Democrats to destroy President Trump, to prevent him from reversing all that Joey has done to destroy this country.

To be perfectly blunt, Carter was an idiot as President, but became evil as a latter-day Leftist ideologue, pushing all manner of radical anti-human garbage. He was both a testament to, and a manifestation of, all that is wrong with those on the left. And like all Leftists and communist sympathizers, he left nothing but misery in his wake, and his demise can only be viewed as being a positive event for this country and humanity in general. And while I’m glad that he’s gone, the fact that he’s gone really changes nothing. It’s not as if we have the ability go back and fix any of the many things that he managed to so badly screw up. There are simply too many.

And finally, it’s in a weird sort of way that we may actually owe Carter, just as we also may owe Obama, a sizeable debt of gratitude. Because I have no doubt that had we not been forced to live through the Carter presidency, Ronald Reagan would have never been elected. And likewise, had we never been made to endure the eight years of Obama, Donald Trump would likely never have been elected. Because without Obama, I think it’s highly unlikely that Donald Trump would have ever chosen to run. Similarly, it’s Joey who has repeatedly made clear just how great of a president Donald Trump was, and hopefully has shown just how badly we need him back.

JIMMY CARTER, AND HOW OPINIONS ARE LIKE…

So what is it about ex-presidents, particularly those of the Democrat persuasion, that makes them think we truly care what they think?  Which brings me to he who, until very recently, politically speaking, had the reputation of being the worst president this country has ever had and who apparently does not have a very high opinion of our current president.  Not that it matters, really, as no one other than those in the Democrat Party, I guess, actually values the opinion of this demented old fool.  And it is in dragging out his raggedy old ass that Democrats reveal just how desperate they have now become in their effort to avoid having to face President Trump in 2020.  I just don’t see how someone with his dismal legacy will be of much help.

And yet it was just this past Friday that ex-president Jimmy Carter very boldly declared that President Trump’s victory in 2016 was essentially illegitimate due to supposed Russian interference in that election.  Now mind you, he had absolutely zero proof to back up his idiotic claim, but since when does someone who is a Democrat ever required to provide proof to back up the accusations that they make.  It was during a panel discussion on, of all things, human rights issues there at the ‘Carter Center’ that this bonehead contended that a proper investigation into the extent of Russian meddling would, in fact, reveal President Trump did not win the White House.  But didn’t we pay Mr. Mueller millions of taxpayer dollars to do exactly that?

Carter was also asked by I’m not sure who, how the current administration should deal with alleged election meddling.  Carter said, “The president himself should condemn it.”  Carter went on to say, “Admit that it happened, which 16 intelligence agencies have already agreed to say.”  He said, “There’s no doubt the Russians did interfere in the election and I think the interference, although not yet quantified, if fully investigated, will show that Trump didn’t actually win the election in 2016.”  And he added, “He lost the election and he was put into office because the Russians interfered on his behalf.”  If there was ever any doubt that Carter was, and is, little more than a partisan political hack that doubt has now been thoroughly debunked!

And it was all just so odd to hear coming from the very same man whose legacy as president is one that has him being responsible for installing the Terrorist Regime of Iran, seeing it as being a good idea to give up the Panama Canal before the lease was up, allowing the American Embassy in Iran to be held hostage for over a year, bringing about the misery index along with double digit interest rates and double digit unemployment, and setting into motion, by signing into law something called ‘The Community Re-Investment Act’ that which would ultimately result in he who would replace Carter as being the ‘Worst President in American History’, Barack Obama, getting elected.  Carter was a failure as president on so many different levels.

Jimmy Carter was the most ineffectual president in modern American history.  His economic and foreign policies were abysmal.  Carter was not a bad man, but he was an inept president, with a cadre of morons working for him.  Barry ‘O’, on the other hand, was, and remains to this day, nothing short of pure evil, full of malevolence toward the United States, especially towards whites.  The level of corruption and the number of scandals that occurred during his tenure was truly remarkable, to the point that our country was lucky to survive.  He was wrong about almost everything but he didn’t care as it was his mission to “fundamentally transform” America.   We have yet to find out the extent to which he may have permanently affected our country. 

For those lucky enough to have missed the Carter years, and may therefore be unfamiliar with why it is that so many folks once referred to him as this nation’s worst president, here are but a few highlights: Carter gave us the Iranian hostage crisis, where STUDENTS took over our embassy and held 52 Americans hostage for 444 days. Carter gave us an annual inflation rate of 12% in a sluggish economy. Carter gave us spiraling gas prices.  Carter routinely demonstrated how he was in over his head.  It became rather obvious, rather quickly, that being president as well as Commander in Chief was something that he simply lacked the aptitude for.  The fact that he was elected had far more to do with timing than it had to do with his political prowess.

Radical Islam was nearly extinct until Jimmy Carter came along and refused to help the Shah of Iran during initial protests by a few radicals, which eventually led to a full blown Islamic revolution.  Then there was the Camp David peace talks during which Carter insisted Israel give back the Sinai to Egypt, and hand the West Bank to Jordan, and give the temple mount security zone to Jordanian control. Golan Heights back to Syria.  In other words give back everything Israel gained during the 6 day war. The threats that we continue to face to this day from this very same region of the globe are a direct result of Carter’s actions, or inactions, in the region during his presidency.  Carter, as do most Democrats had an odd definition of diplomacy.  

Think about what would have happened if it had been Jimmy Carter who had been president during World War II.  It’s very unlikely that Carter would not have retaliated against Japan, McArthur never would have returned to Philippines, U.S. would have surrendered to Japan and England would now be Germany.  Because D-Day would have never happened and he most certainly would never dropped the atomic bombs that caused Japan to finally surrender and which ultimately saved more lives than were lost because of the bombs.  Jimmy Carter’s goal was always to surrender at all costs because all wars cannot be won so simply surrender to avoid war altogether.  Jimmy Carter was then, and he remains to this very day, little more than an idiot.

And if we’re going to have a serious discussion about interference in our election process than we’re going to need to talk about the actual interference that was made possible, and even actively participated in, by the likes of Google, Twitter, YouTube and Facebook, to name just a few, who blocked conservatives in their attempt to affect the 2016 election outcome?  And make no mistake I have no doubt that they are already very busy at work formulating their plan about how best to have the greatest impact possible on the 2020 election, and to ensure their desired result.  But Democrats like Carter have no interest in doing that, because doing so might have a negative impact on the Democrats’ ability to win elections. 

Carter would serve himself better by keeping his mouth shut instead of insisting upon continuing to open it leaving no doubt that he is little more than the addle-headed old fool we all know him to be. Nearly forty years ago he was essentially thrown out of office after one term. His administration stood as being the most inept until Barry ‘O’ came along, but where Carter was merely inept, Barry was corrupt to the extreme.  And it was Barry who would easily eclipse Carter as being this nation’s worst president. Time tends to heal all things and the public's disapproval of Carter was beginning to moderate.  But it is once again that he has proven the perception we had of him in 1980 when he was thrown out of office was the correct one. 

I am curious about something though.  I’m wondering if Carter somehow thinks it’s a bad thing that President Trump has made it possible for us to have achieved the lowest unemployment rate for blacks in over two decades and the lowest for women in forever.  Or that we now have over 4 million fewer Americans having to rely on food stamps?  And does Carter think it bad that, thanks to the president significantly reducing government regulations, companies are now able to expand and hire more people.  And I’m sure that Carter is none too happy that President Trump is working hard to rebuild our military, and he’s likely disappointed that we won’t be sending pallets of cash any country that is a state sponsor of terrorism.

Like ex-vice president ‘Creep Joe’ Biden, ex-president Jimmy Carter should realize that his time was essentially up decades ago and that his comments are no more relevant than other relics from our political past.  He is now close to 100 and has no more insight than his penchant for spewing that which is pure leftist political drivel. Of course he still considers himself a Democrat, and he seems to care very little about how far to the left his beloved Democrat Party has been moved. Carter has come to belong to a little club of other no-longer relevant leftist losers who need to go away. Folks like John Kerry-Heinz and Hitlery while still around spreading hate just need to go away.  They are now out of office and America is all the better for it.

JIMMY CARTER, BLAMING THE NRA…

I’m pretty sure that it won’t come as much of a surprise that the fella who, were it not for Barack Hussein Obama would have continued wearing the moniker of ‘Worst President in American History’, is another of those corrupt politicians who denies knowing why it is that the Second Amendment exists.  Which is, of course, as that last line of defense against a tyrannical government.  And while our all-knowing and all seeing federal government has yet to reach that point, those paying attention see it as moving ever closer with each passing day. Thank the Founding Fathers for having had the wisdom to provide the citizens with the Right to safeguard their freedom.

And so it was on this past Tuesday on the Communist Broadcasting System, aka CBS, that ex-president Jimmy Carter claimed during an interview “CBS This Morning,” that the National Rifle Association (NRA) represents the interests of gun manufactures and sellers, not gun owners.  And talking about student gun control activists, Jimmy said, “I just hope and pray they will be persistent in their commitment and they will continue to use their influence on adults that who have reached voting age already, and when they reach voting age they will be willing to turn out of office the people who have abjectly submitted themselves to the domination of the NRA.”

And Jimmy added, “The NRA basically represents gun manufacturers and sellers instead of the average hunters and people who use guns for their own defense. I think the distortion of the Second Amendment has been a mistake. There is no threat to the Second Amendment among the side of young people to have good background checks before you can buy a weapon and you can do away with the rapid-fire military weapons that we have authorized.”  Once again it’s Jimmy who seems to go out of his way to make sure we all remember just how dishonest he truly is.  Like any of us who were around during his presidency would ever really forget.  Not hardly!

Look, there is but one reason that this bonehead was ever elected president in the first place, and that’s because he was simply in the right place at the right time, politically speaking.  Watergate was still very fresh in the minds of the American people and many were upset with the fact that President Ford pardoned Nixon.  That and Jimmy didn’t ‘appear’ as some crazy left wing bomb-throwing-dictator-wannabe.  And of course we didn’t have Fox News or the Internet to give us both sides.  And there was the media running in lock step with no push back as there was NO talk radio because the ‘Fairness Doctrine’ was still very much in effect!

Let’s face it, Jimmy has always had a rather difficult relationship with the truth.  Now, according to Jimmy, we are not only controlled by guns, we are controlled by their manufacturers as well.  It seems that guns have their own type of derangement syndrome.  Guns, guns and more guns, it’s all about guns, or is it?  Because what it’s really all about is banning the private ownership of guns, which, by the way, would be enforced by people WITH guns, so that we the disarmed masses would have no way of protecting ourselves against their intended, and highly desired, brand of tyranny.  They are fine with well-armed storm troopers just not a well-armed citizenry.

If the government were to tell you tomorrow that you no longer had freedom of speech, and that if you were to say something considered by that same government to be ‘the wrong thing’ and for that offense you would be jailed, how would you be able to resist? Despite the claims made by Jimmy and his leftist cohorts it’s the Second Amendment that protects all the rest of your rights by providing you a means of resisting tyranny!  It’s not about hunting or target shooting, it’s about providing ‘We the People’ with the ultimate means of resistance!  Resistance from what it is that Jimmy and his friends on the left dream about inflicting upon this country.

Why is it that when it comes to this most recent shooting in Florida and this silly made-for-TV ‘March for our Lives’, that none of the players mention how it was that we had a Sheriff’s Deputy standing outside while the shooting took place, how the County Sheriff set up a parameter instead of rushing in to save lives, or why the police, after 38 visits to this kid’s house, had no idea there was an issue, OR why the FBI, after receiving a tip that there was a threat that he was going to blow, did not take the time to go to check out the tip?  None of these things are talked about, because it’s easier to blame the gun or the NRA, than say government screwed up!

Can we all agree that Jimmy is nothing more than a pathological liar? The NRA has millions of members and we are not gun manufacturers.  What we are, are folks who love our country, our freedom and our Constitution, unlike Jimmy and the rest of his Godless Democrats.  His lies are believed only by those who call the Democrat Party home.  He makes the argument for wanting to take our guns using the false premise that by doing so we can prevent loss of life, while it’s the same time that Jimmy and his friends actively advocate for the wholesale butchering of over a million defenseless baby's every single year through abortion for both convenience and profit.  

The long term goal of the left is to make it so we are all as defenseless as those over 60 million babies that they’ve had no problem whatsoever with killing since Roe versus Wade.  This quest of the left to seize our guns has nothing whatsoever to with children, or cutting the level of gun violence or even with public safety.  It, as had been said so many times before, has EVERYTHING to do with control and about power.  Control of, and power over, the people.  And Jimmy’s idiotic rant about how the NRA somehow only supporting gun manufactures proves just how ignorant and blatantly dishonest he truly his.  But then this is how those on the left operate.  

THE CONTINUING TREACHERY OF A DISGUSTING EX-PRESIDENT, JIMMY CARTER…

Jimmy Carter has once again proven, beyond a shadow of a doubt, that you just can’t keep a good traitor down, and has demonstrated yet again just how determined he is not to lose his title as “Worst American Ex-President Still Alive.”  After having now lost his crown as ‘The Worst American of All Time” to Barry, Jimmy sought to gain favor by providing an interview with the George Soros-funded "policy studies" nonprofit Aspen Institute.  And of course as the former “Worst President of the United States”, Carter did what he has always done best: criticize America.

And for that, of course, he was rewarded with frequent applause from those in attendance, a crowd who very obviously shared his revulsion for this the greatest country in the history of humankind. When asked about Barry's rather obvious inability to "establish relationships with other countries," Carter replied that “I think the historical trend is for the United States to relinquish its unquestioned domination of the world’s politics and economy and cultural influence."  Spoken like the insidious, senile, shriveled up prick that he is!  Nothing ever changes with this guy.

Carter’s notion that we are relinquishing our economic, cultural, and political influence to China, Russia, India, and others, actually brought applause.  It’s mission accomplished for progressives.  And I’m not sure if that’s because they’re actually naïve enough to think that that’s a good idea, or if they simply hate America so much that they have become willing to turn the whole shooting match over to an ideology responsible for the death of hundreds of millions of innocent men, women and children.  And how demented must one be in order to think like that?

It might also be worth noting that there really is no such thing as an "historical trend" independent of human agency.  History isn't like the weather.  It is shaped, for good or ill, by the will of world leaders, or in Carter's case, the rather purposeful lack of will.  So there is no such thing as an historical "inevitability," as Carter put it, that America will relinquish its superpower preeminence.  That our nation is in decline is not because that is the historical "trend" or that it is "inevitable," but because our leaders have taken it upon themselves to steer us in that direction.

Carter continued, musing on how the United States can fit into this Brave New World. He said, “I think the American superpower goal should be to be the champion of peace, and to be the champion of human rights, and to be the champion of the environment and to be the most generous nation on Earth.”  Applause followed every clause of that sentence.  Of course, we're talking about the Aspen Institute, which operates from the belief that the United States is a nation whose history is an unbroken narrative of injustice and deep-seated “structural racism.”

But I have news for every self-righteous, self-loathing, progressive idiot in that audience, and for Jimmy Carter, our Ambassador of Anti-Americanism.  The fact is that historically, America has been the champion of peace, the champion of human rights, the most generous nation on Earth, and even the champion of the environment. What other nation on earth can claim to have filled any of those roles, much less all of them? Russia? China? India? Saudi Arabia? Great Britain? France? Venezuela? Cuba? Pakistan?  Or Carter's personal favorite, "Palestine"?

No. Only the United States of America. And America continues to be all of those things.  But Carter wasn't done yet, far from it. He went on to declare that "We are the most warlike country on Earth."  What a blatantly offensive lie.  But this is the kind of drivel that Carter, the elder statesman of the Democrat Party, has been known ever since first leaving office.  And you rarely hear anyone on the left disagreeing with anything that the obviously demented Carter ever says.  That would only be, of course, because they are in total agreement with him.    

The truth is that Carter and his ilk at the Aspen Institute and in the White House are actively seeking to dismantle the greatest national force for good in the world that has ever existed. They believe that if only America would demilitarize itself and let the world up from beneath the heels of its jackboots, then peace would reign supreme and world cultures would hold hands and sing in perfect harmony like a 1970s Coke commercial.  However, the reality of these progressive utopians will be not paradise, but hell on earth forced upon future generations.

Let’s face it, whether anyone on the left cares to admit it or not, Carter has only one lasting legacy as president, and it coincides rather nicely with all that this rather pathetic scumbag has ever stood for.  That being, of course, the modern era of continuing Islam terrorism which he played a crucial role in igniting.  Carter, as you may recall, forced the Shah of Iran, who was then an important ally of America, to leave his country which then allowed the Ayatollah Khomeini to return from ‘exile’ and to then overthrow what was the sovereign government of Iran. 

That one act is what can be said to have been the flashpoint that first created the issue that we are still made to face today and that Barry simply refuses to deal with.  What appears to be taking place today, and what may be what Carter had in mind all those many years ago, is an alliance of sorts between these Muslim extremists and the American left.  After all, both hate this country and both seem to hate Christians.  Granted, the left is not cutting off heads, but that does not mean a war on religion is not going on in this country.  So an alliance only serves to make perfect sense. 

JIMMY CARTER, FORMERLY KNOWN AS OUR WORST PRESIDENT…

Speaking as someone who definitely knows a thing or two about "screwing things up", especially in this same region of the world, ex-president Jimmy Carter is better qualified than most when it comes to criticizing Barry’s rather inept execution of some semblance of a rational Middle East policy. Carter said that Barry has continued to shift policies and ultimately waited too long to take action against the Islamic State of Iraq (ISIS). That would also be the same group that Barry has declared has absolutely nothing to do with the violent cult of Islam.

In an interview published just yesterday in the Fort Worth Star-Telegram, Carter said Barry’s administration, by not acting sooner, allowed ISIS to build up its strength. He said, "[W]e waited too long. We let the Islamic State build up its money, capability and strength and weapons while it was still in Syria." He went on to say, "Then when [ISIS] moved into Iraq, the Sunni Muslims didn’t object to their being there and about a third of the territory in Iraq was abandoned." It’s pretty bad when you’ve got someone like Carter criticizing you.

The administration has launched airstrikes in both Iraq and Syria, which some have call "pin pricks" designed neither to kill terrorists nor to inflict all that much damage. Meanwhile ISIS has swept across much of northern and central Iraq and has released videos of its members beheading two U.S. journalists and two British aid workers, so far. Carter said Barry’s air campaign against ISIS in Iraq has "a possibility of success," provided that some troops are available on the ground. He did not specify whether he meant U.S. or other ground forces.

The Democrat ex-president also accused Barry of shifting his Middle East policy on several occasions. It was in describing Barry’s Middle East strategy, or lack thereof, that Cater said, "It changes from time to time." Carter went on to say, "I noticed that two of his secretaries of defense, after they got out of office, were very critical of the lack of positive action on the part of the president." But let’s face it, if either of these guys had had serious concerns regarding what Barry doing, or not doing, they should have acted while still able to do something about it.

Carter was making a reference to former defense secretaries Robert Gates and Leon Panetta who, in preferring book sales over taking action to protect the country, have each now released a memoir detailing frustrations with Barry’s foreign policy and management style. In particular, Panetta, who stepped down just last year, has criticized Barry in several interviews since the release of his book earlier this week. But I think Panetta’s motive is very clear, as a close friend of Hitlery, he’s doing his best to grease the skids regarding her possible White House run.

Typically, former presidents are often seen as being reluctant to criticize one another, as well as the sitting president out of respect for the difficulty and pressures of the job, unless, of course, you happen to be a scumbag Democrat ex-president like a Carter or ‘Slick Willie’. Former Republican President George W. Bush has repeatedly declined to disparage his successor. But neither Carter, nor old ‘Slick’, has ever demonstrated such a level class, and has shown on any number of occasions not to be the least bit hesitant when it comes to criticizing other presidents.

Carter, I think it fair to say, is someone of whom it can be said struck the match that ignited what would become the Muslim scourge that we are forced to contend with today. It was on Carter’s watch that the Shah of Iran, up until that time considered to be a staunch ally of the United States since 1953, was essentially nudged out in 1979. And it was, like Barry, Carter’s inept approach to foreign policy that made it possible for the Ayatollah Khomeni to return to Iran on February 1, 1979, and serve as being the first contact between the United States and the cult of radical Islam.

JIMMY CARTER AND THE MYTH OF EQUAL PAY…

He who possessed the reputation of having been what many have called this nation’s worst president before he was lucky enough to have Barry came along, Jimmy Carter, now says that it’s the Bible that’s to blame for the fact that women make less money than men in the workplace. So I’m curious, might that be the rationale used by Barry’s for his deciding to pay the women who work for him less than what he pays the men? Just askin’.

It was in a recent interview with NBC's Andrea Mitchell that Jimmy proceeded to rattle off some supposed statistics on the issue of unequal pay between the two genders. Carter said, "In the United States for the same exact work for a full-time employee, women get 23 percent less pay than men." He added. "And in the Fortune 500, only 21 of those leaders among the 500 are women, and in that high level they get 42 percent less pay" than men.

Now it was last year at an event celebrating the Equal Pay Act, that Barry repeated the myth that women earn 77 cents on a man's dollar. He said at the time, "The day that the bill was signed into law, women earned 59 cents for every dollar a man earned on average. Today, it's about 77 cents." Barry went on to claim, "Over the course of her career, a working woman with a college degree will earn on average hundreds of thousands of dollars less than a man who does the same work. " Every syllable was pure Democrat bullshit.

Something rarely of ever mentioned by Democrats is the fact that unmarried childless women's salaries very often exceed men's. In an actual comparison of unmarried and childless men and women between the ages of 35 and 43, it was found that, sorry Jimmy, women earn more, roughly 108 cents to a man's dollar. And honestly, wouldn’t you would think that if Barry was so concerned about the wage gap, why not fix things there in the White House? In 2012, female White House staffers made 87 cents on a man's dollar.

And here’s something else to consider. Women often make less than men because they choose more humanities and fewer science and math majors at college. Then, when they graduate, more choose to enter the non-profit or government sector. Finally, many actually choose to work fewer hours to better combine work and family. In May, 2013, according to Labor Department data, 23 percent of women worked part-time, compared to 11 percent of men. But to Democrats this is all of little consequence, it doesn’t fit the liberal narrative.

So like Barry, Jimmy offers up sone pretty questionable ‘proof’ to support his premise. However, unlike other Democrats, Carter has come up with a rather new spin on things after supposedly spending three years researching a link between religion and the abuse of young girls and women across the world for some new book his entitled, "A Call to Action: Women, Religion, Violence, and Power." His supposed research concluded that, yes, there is a link between religion and how females are treated, even in the workplace.

Carter said, "That is really derived, I would say, indirectly from the fact that religious leaders say that women are inferior in the eyes of God, which is a false interpretation of the Holy Scriptures." He then went on to say, "When [men] see the Pope and the Southern Baptist Convention and others say that women can't serve as priests equally with men, they say, 'Well, I'll treat my wife the way I want to because she's inferior to me.'" Is anyone really buying any of this drivel?

In the proposal for his book, Carter called the treatment of women a "human rights" issue. "I am convinced that discrimination against women and girls is one of the world's most serious, all-pervasive and largely ignored violations of basic human rights," Carter wrote, as reported by the New York Times. "It is disturbing to realize that women are treated most equally in some countries that are atheistic or where governments are strictly separated from religion," he said.

Ya know, it is my firm belief that this is really nothing more than part of what has become a concerted effort to convince women that it’s the Democrat Party that should be seen as being their protector. But it continues to be just the opposite that’s true, unless of course one’s looking for a free abortion. Because it has been during this president’s economy that women have been to suffer, unable to find a job. It’s Barry’s policies that have had the biggest impact on women and how they are able to go about living their lives.

APPARENTLY, JIMMY CARTER IS FEELING LEFT OUT???

If we can believe Jimmy Carter, somehow Barry "Almighty" is the first president to not see the wisdom in seeking advice from the former president who, up until 2008, had been considered by many to have been the worst president in modern American history. At least that’s what Carter told NBC’s "Meet the Press" on Sunday. "President Clinton did and President George W. Bush and H.W. Bush and even Ronald Reagan used to call on us to go into sensitive areas," Carter told NBC’s Andrea Mitchell Sunday. Although, try as I might, I just can’t come up with a single reason that might have prompted Reagan to have ever bothered to make such a call. So I’m not quite sure what it is that might have motivated Ronald Reagan to call him, other than to perhaps ask, "Hey Jimmy, what the hell were you thinking when you did that?" Other than that, I doubt there would have been much reason for any call to have been made.

Many have argued that in many ways Barry’s presidency is essentially nothing more than a continuation of Carter’s disastrous four years in office. And since the men see the world through a similar lens, there would never be any need for communication to take place. It is difficult to explain with "complete candor" why he and Barry do not have a closer relationship, Carter said, but he thinks it has something to do with his center at Emory University. He believes the Carter Center's views of equal treatment when it comes to the Middle East's countries may have caused tension between him and Barry. "I think the problem was that — in dealing with the issue of peace in between Israel and Egypt — the Carter Center has taken a very strong and public position of equal treatment between the Palestinians and the Israelis," said Carter. "And I think this was a sensitive area in which the president didn't want to be involved."

Carter also told Mitchell that he left the Southern Baptist Convention last year after it passed rules at its annual meeting "to require that women be subservient to their husbands, and women could no longer serve as a pastoral priest or as a deacon." Carter had been part of the SBC for years before he left the church, serving as a deacon and Sunday School teacher for six decades. Carter also commented on the problem of sexual abuse in the military and on the nation's college and university campuses. "Presidents of universities and colleges and commanding officers don't want to admit that under their leadership, sexual abuse is taking place, so rapists prevail," Carter said. And that’s exactly what I would expect to hear from someone who, like Barry, possesses absolutely zero leadership ability and is nothing more than an armchair quarterback. And as such. I feel that Carter really has no right to criticize those who do.

Also, as if anyone were truly interested, Carter made his opinion known on the ongoing situation in Ukraine. Remember now, that it was in 1980 when he banned U.S. athletes from participating in the Moscow Olympics. That was his rather limp-wristed response to the then-Soviet Union's invasion of Afghanistan. And Carter said where the Ukraine is concerned, "there has to be a concerted international prohibition against Putin going any further than Crimea." But the problem with that supposed solution is the fact that Barry has now lost the trust of most of our friends, and any semblance of respect of our enemies. And just like Carter before him, Barry now seems very determined in his efforts to put America on the path to be so severely weakened that she will be made incapable of providing leadership. And just as it was with Carter, that’s exactly Barry’s intent. Neither man views America as being a force for good.

And of course Carter also saw fit to discuss, briefly, the scandal concerning the National Security Agency and its surveillance practices. "I have felt that my own communications were probably monitored," said Carter. "When I want to communicate with a foreign leader privately, I type or write the letter myself, put it in the mailbox and mail it... I believe if I send an email it will be monitored." What business does this political has-been have communicating with foreign leaders? And is it not, more often then not, that he chooses to communicate with those with whom he has much more in common? That would be those who, like him, hate this country. So it is with great curiosity that I wonder just what sort of information this former president might wish to keep from prying eyes. Like Barry, Carter has demonstrated on any number of occasions that he is nothing less than an enemy of this country.

JIMMY CARTER...AS SENILE AS EVER...