NANCY PROVIDES A REASON TO VOTE DEMOCRAT…NOT!!!

Well, if there is anyone out there in need of that little extra nudge to convince them that voting Democrat this November is the right thing to do, then it was earlier this week that Nancy Pelosi went out of her way to provide you with that nudge.  You see, it was on Wednesday of this week that Pelosi “vowed” that Democrats will rework the Republican tax bill if they are successful in their endeavor to retake the House in this November’s midterm elections.  Hey, she convinced me!  NOT!!

And it came about while she was speaking at a Culver City town hall event as part of the Democrats’ “Repeal the Trump Tax” tour.  Pelosi pledged to those in attendance that Democrats would overhaul the tax bill into one that “creates growth, creates good-paying jobs, as it reduces the deficit.”  And in making it clear how she feels about the GOP tax cuts, it was in typical Democrat fashion that this shriveled up old hag said, “Over 80 percent of the benefits go to the top 1 percent.”

Now look, we all know, or should know, that Nancy favors tax hikes more so than tax cuts.  And in what was a blatant effort to mischaracterize the GOP tax cuts she said, “Eighty-six million middle-class families will see a tax increase while they advertise it as a middle-class bill.”  Despite her claim, it’s according to the non-partisan Tax Policy Center that the average household will receive a tax cut of $1,610 in 2018.  Only 5 percent of taxpayers will see increased taxes in 2018. 

And then it was one of Nancy’s trusty little sidekicks, Ted Lieu, who happens to be another California Democrat, decided to throw his two cents into the argument by spewing what has become the typical brand of leftwing fearmongering by throwing around claims about how the Republican tax cuts would result in “deep cuts to Social Security, to Medicare, to all these critical programs that serve a lot of Americans.”  None of which has any real basis in fact.

Now of course Pelosi didn’t bother to offer up any specifics when asked if Democrats would re-work the bill from scratch or focus on specific portions, saying instead her party would work openly with Republicans to reach a deal.  She said, “One of our complaints about what they did with the tax bill is they did it in the dark of night with the speed of light.”  I think she must be a little confused here, because isn’t that exactly how Nancy and her fellow Democrats ‘passed’ Obamacare?   

And never-mind what she actually did with Obamacare, the 2400 pages only put out to Congress the day it was ‘passed’, with something like 400 of those pages being added just a couple of hours before the vote!  If it weren't for double standards, Democrats would have no standards at all.  But if it weren't for disinformation, Democrats wouldn't have any information at all, and if it weren't for ‘fake news’, Democrats wouldn't have any news at all.  But I digress.

Nancy said, “We’ll sit down at the table and say … what would be a tax bill that creates growth, that creates good paying jobs as it reduces the deficit?”  And she added, “It’s not about chipping at this piece or that piece, it’s about a comprehensive look at what our tax policy should be for the future.”  She said, “Secondly, we would do it so it would be transparent so that people could understand the ramifications of this, that or the other.” Transparent in the same way they ‘passed’ Obamacare? 

Pelosi’s comments Wednesday come after she said in February that Democrats would have to “replace and repeal” the GOP tax bill upon retaking the House.  And it was Chuckie Schumer who offered a more specific proposal towards reworking the GOP tax plan in March.  His plan called for a number of tax hikes, including lifting the corporate tax rate to 25 percent, raising the income tax rate to 39.6 percent for high earning Americans and slashing the carried-interest tax loophole.

Chuckie said, “We want to roll back the Republicans’ tax giveaways to corporations and the wealthy and invest that money instead in jobs and infrastructure.”  All of this despite the fact that public opinion polls indicate voters are warming to the Republican tax bill, up from 37% in December to 50% in February. It kind of tells you how thoroughly screwed up things have now gotten in this country when Americans have to ‘warm up’ to the notion of getting a tax cut.  Bizarre! 

But you know, this is all such a worn out and tired argument, and nothing we haven’t heard before and more times than I care to count.  Democrats knows full well that if people are encouraged to work and to build lives for themselves, and their families, they will likely become less reliant on government and therefore less likely to vote Democrat.  So it's been in recent years that Democrats have seemed less interested in trying to disguise their platform and now profess to be proud Socialists.

Hence the reason they don't seem to like the fact that nearly three million NEW jobs have been created in the economy and most of them are in manufacturing where wages are higher than during the eight years of Barry ‘O’.  Additionally individual wages have grown by nearly 2.5 Percent under President Trump.  And if Democrats do regain control of the House, the Senate, or, God forbid, both we can once again look forward to economic stagnation and job losses.

The Democrats seem to be returning to the same "We intend to raise your taxes. Vote for us!" campaign platform the rocketed Walter Mondale to his heartbreaking, cliffhanger of a razor thin, 49 to 1 loss to Reagan in 1984, wherein Mondale pocketed a hefty 13 electoral votes. But this time they are adding a little “furthermore, we intend to flood your neighborhoods with Mexicans!”  We can only hope that the plan works as well for the Democrats as it did for old Walter back in ’84.

Let’s face it, when was the last time anyone can remember when those in the Democrat Party honestly cared about private sector job growth and debt reduction, especially during the eight years of Barry ‘O’.  Barry was only concerned about doubling the “irresponsible, unpatriotic” national debt, debt that he had vowed to cut in half within four years.  And he was responsible for bringing about a labor participation rate that was the lowest since the days of Jimmy Carter.

Thank GOD we now have Nancy openly stating EXACTLY what it is that the Democrats have in store for the American people should they be able to return to the majority in one, or both houses of Congress.  Now we know if conservatives don't turn out en masse to keep these Democrats from taking over the House and/or the Senate, we may never see a Republican president again.  Democrats will seek to punish us and to strip us of every single thing that we have worked so hard for.

I once heard Hitlery make the claim, I think it was during her most recent failed attempt to become the first female president of the United States, that the economy ALWAYS does better when there is a Democrat in the White House.  But when comparing the eight years of Barry ‘O’ to the first year of President Trump, the difference, economically speaking, could not be more stark.  And what do the Democrats want to do?  Nothing but to return to the same failed policies.

HITLERY, 17 MONTHS AND COUNTING…

So here we are nearly 17 months after the last presidential election and still the Hitlery Clinton ‘Blame Express’ continues to roll on down the highway showing no signs of running out of gas any time soon.  It was just this past Tuesday that Hitlery was found speaking to an organization who just so happens to be under investigation for gender discrimination, as she continued to lay all manner of blame on any number of people who she sees as being responsible for her embarrassing loss.  And nowhere on her list does it mention the fact that she herself is the ONLY reason she lost.  

‘The Wing’ is currently under investigation by the New York City Commission on Human Rights for not allowing men into their “co-working space and social club.”  Wing co-founder Audrey Gelman and podcast co-host Aminatou Sow asked Hitlery questions in front of an audience at ‘The Wing SoHo’ that was live-streamed to the group’s website. The mood was extremely supportive of Hitlery and critical of the current presidential administration, as the two hosts lobbed softball questions at Hitlery, who spent much of her time listing those she blames for her 2016 defeat.

Asked whether the #MeToo movement would have happened by now if she had been elected, Hitlery said yes and claimed that her loss accelerated the wave that was already coming.  She then lamented how hard it is to watch Donald Trump be President, but that she admires the “resistance.”  Hitlery talked about trying to keep herself aligned with what will make a difference, the midterm elections, a “political action that reigns in this administration.” She said without that, you haven’t “seen the bottom yet.”  Yet had she been elected we would have gone through the bottom.

Hitlery said, “You can march from now til doomsday, but if you don’t elect people who agree with you, and defeat people who don’t, nothing will change.”  But isn’t that exactly what we ‘Deplorables’ who voted for Trump did?  We chose to elect the guy who essentially agreed with us on most of the issues and to defeat the woman, not because she was a woman but, because she was someone with whom we agreed on virtually nothing.  And the sooner the old girl comes to grips with that little fact the better off everyone is going to be, including her own beloved Democrat Party.   

Hitlery also took the opportunity to paint the Electoral College as outdated, saying that it “does an injustice to the idea of one person one vote,” pointing to it as a “part of the slavery compromise back in the day where small states with much less population than big states … would be able to have their votes counted in a much more impactful way than if it were just a popular election.”  She then suggested support for work to “change the directions that electors are given,” to vote for the person who got the most votes in the country instead of the most votes in their state.

And of course Hitlery also blamed the Access Hollywood tape news for overtaking media coverage of the CIA director and Director of National Intelligence, on October 7, stating that Russia was interfering in the 2016 election.  She blamed WikiLeaks leaking DNC emails for further dominating media coverage instead of the Russia interference and she even brought up the Pizza-gate ‘scandal’ which she used as a way of transitioning into talking about how Trump continually brought up WikiLeaks on the campaign trail, skewing the information there into “bizarre interpretations.”

She repeatedly commented that it was generally accepted that she was going to win and that that did complicate things.  She said the press didn’t know how to cover the election and reverted to criticizing her, and that people must demand that the press “check their sexism and their misogyny” in their treatment of those running for office.  Gleman asked Hitlery what her legacy will be and Hitlery pointed to her 1995 “transformational” Beijing speech on women’s rights as her public, political life legacy and being the first woman nominated by a major party for President.

She said sometimes the struggle gets to be too much, that “there’s still so much in society that just batters you,” and that she hopes that women will be supported in places like the Wing. She said she hoped that her “persistence” and “resilience” will “give people the courage to keep going.” She called it the “best form of revenge by making it clear you are not going to be stopped, you’re not going to be disrespected, you’re not going to be undermined, you’re gonna be who you intend to be, and if that’s some small part of my legacy, then I will be very, very happy and grateful.”

Hitlery will be remembered as the presidential candidate who everyone thought was unbeatable because she was running against a person who those in the media and in Hollyweird simply laughed at from the time he announced he was running.  Then she got trounced in the Electoral College that she now criticizes as being outdated.  And while she should be indicted for her many crimes, and breaches of our national security, she won’t be.  And she will be remembered for being nothing more than a failed power-hungry megalomaniac that people were too smart to elect as president.

Personally I’d be glad if all of the madness simply came to an end with Hitlery finally accepting the fact that there was no grand conspiracy that prevented her from obtaining that which she thought she so richly deserved.  Barry ‘O’ spent his entire eight years in office blaming Bush for all that went wrong on his watch, so is this now what we can expect from Hitlery for the next two, or possibly six, years?  Are we going to be forced to listen to how it was that she was somehow robbed of her rightful place as first female president of the Unite States?  If so, just shoot me now!

The truth is that Hitlery, just like millions of other folks, was convinced that there was absolutely no way she could possibly lose to Trump, and yet she did.  Her plan was to play it safe, to keep a low profile and to simply coast to a win, which, in looking back, was obviously the wrong strategy.  And now I can only assume that her loss was such a traumatic event for her that it must have caused something within her to simply snap.  Thus, practically since election night, we’ve been subjected to what has become nothing more than a growing laundry list of excuses for why she lost.

OUR ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION PROBLEM, CREATED BY DEMOCRATS…

I say self-inflicted because it all started with a creation of Teddy Kennedy’s called The Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965.  The passage of which marked a fundamental change in America’s immigration policy because rather than serving the interests of Americans and national unity by setting limits on immigration, the act put “family unification” as the top priority, serving the interests of foreigners first.

And it was at the time that Teddy made the following claims about his little creation:

Teddy said, “First, our cities will not be flooded with a million immigrants annually. Under the proposed bill, the present level of immigration remains substantially the same. 

Secondly, the ethnic mix of this country will not be upset… Contrary to the charges in some quarters, [the bill] will not inundate America with immigrants from any one country or area, or the most populated and deprived nations of Africa and Asia…

In the final analysis, the ethnic pattern of immigration under the proposed measure is not expected to change as sharply as the critics seem to think… The bill will not flood our cities with immigrants. It will not upset the ethnic mix of our society. It will not relax the standards of admission. It will not cause American workers to lose their jobs.”

Thankfully since then old Teddy has moved on to the great beyond where, as I so fervently hope, he will spend all of eternity rotting in Hell.  But, knowing the perverted old drunkard like we all did, how have Teddy’s claims stood up to the passage of time?  Well, I’m afraid not exactly as old Teddy predicted they would, which should come as no surprise since he knew he was lying when he made them. 

Because you see:

Fifty years later, the Census bureau predicts that the foreign-born population is set to increase 85 percent by 2060, where Hispanics will see their number grow by the tens of millions and native-born whites are the only group expected to decline in both absolute numbers and fertility rates.

Fifty years later, the U.S. places no numerical limit on the immediate family members of aliens admitted into the country. Despite holding only five percent of the world’s population, the U.S. is the most popular destination in the world for immigrants, attracting 20 percent of all the world’s migrants.

Fifty years later, the U.S. allows some 11 to 20 million illegal aliens to squat on its territory while allowing over one million more each year to legally enter the country.

Fifty years later, the native-born population of whites, blacks, Hispanics, Asians, Jews and all the rest suffer economic loss while the foreign-born see net job growth.

Fifty years later, Central American governments are propped up by $12.2 billion in remittances taken out of the American economy by foreign workers the U.S. refuses to tax or expel.

Fifty years later, Central American migrants, thousands of whom are indigenous Mayans who can’t write or speak even Spanish, storm the border in endless waves while federal agents fly them to nearly every state in the union without so much as a photo ID — while American citizens are fondled and scanned by the very same TSA agents.

Fifty years later, we had Rep. Luis Gutierrez threatening Americans in Spanish, vowing that they will be made to suffer “electoral punishment” for resisting a path to citizenship for illegal aliens, declaring his one loyalty is the not to the United States but to foreigners breaking immigration laws, and printing “Do Not Deport Me” cards for those same individuals.

Fifty years later, Americans were led by a president, Barry ‘O’, who illegally granted deportation stays for five million illegals that allowed them to get Social Security numbers (and therefore the ability to vote in U.S. elections) along with $35,000 per head in tax benefit freebies forcibly taken from Americans who managed to hold onto their jobs, who joyfully predicted that a “President Rodriguez” will leave the borders wide open for future tsunamis of immigrants.

Fifty years later, American schools punish “racist” students who wear shirts depicting the American flag and taxpayer-funded colleges vote to ban the flag after angry illegal immigrants complain it “triggers” them.

Fifty years later, American marathon runners walk on prosthetic limbs and suffer through countless painful surgeries after Moslem Chechen immigrants Tamerlane and Dzhokhar Tsarnaev were granted asylum so they could plot against the country that bent over backwards to accommodate them.

Add to all that the costs Americans pay in lower wages, strained social safety nets, their children’s blood, their declining quality of life, the chaos of sharing space with an ever-swelling criminal population aided and abetted by the nation’s elite, the berating Americans of every stripe endure when they dare ask their country merely be preserved, that’s the real legacy of Teddy ‘The Boozer’ Kennedy.

If nothing else this provides yet another example of how the Democrat Party and those who insist upon voting for Democrats, have long been the greatest threat this country has ever been made to face.  And we now find our country in a situation for which there may be no real solution.  And because this is yet another mess created primarily by Democrats, Democrats have no interest in finding a solution.

And again, what we see happening is exactly what was intended to happen.  But this is but one more example of the damage that has been done to this country by a political party that has been focused for decades on one thing, the complete destruction of the greatest experiment in human freedom ever created.  And we the people have played a very active role in essentially bringing about our own demise.

Our Constitution is neither a self-actuating nor is it a self-correcting document.  It requires the constant attention and devotion of ALL our citizens. There is a story, often told, that upon exiting the Constitutional Convention, back in 1787, Benjamin Franklin was approached by a group of citizens asking what sort of government the delegates had created.  His answer was: “A republic, if you can keep it.”

Well it took us a bit over 230 years but today our republic is now quite literally hanging by a thread.  And while, I suppose, it would be very easy to lay all of the blame on our politicians, the sad truth of it is that we the people had to elect those politicians.  Politicians who claimed to have the best interests of our country at heart but in fact are interested in nothing more than what remains best for them.

And then once they’re elected too many of us are too blind, too ignorant or simply too uninformed to recognize that they have no interest in us or the country, and never did.  So here we are, on the verge of having squandered something so rare and leaving behind for our children not a legacy of freedom, but of potential servitude to a government not of, by and for the people but of, by and for the political elite.

THE DEMOCRAT PARTY, THE SECOND AMENDMENT AND NOVEMBER’S ELECTION…

Slowly but surely the true agenda of the Democrat Party, as it relates to the Second Amendment, is beginning to leak out.  And while those Democrats considered to be more moderate may deny their goal is the repeal of the Second Amendment, what’s being said by the more prominent voices of the party would seem to indicate that that is exactly what the party is seeking.  And as was recently made clear by someone who sounds very much as if he is already a Democrat candidate for president, we had ‘Slow Joe’ Biden recent stating how, in his opinion, our Second Amendment has been very badly interpreted or to use his words, has “been so prostituted.”    

And then we had some bimbo by the name Karen Carter Peterson, (having three names makes you sound more important) who is the Democratic National Committee (DNC) vice chair for ‘civic engagement and voter protection’, who was successful in unleashing the wrath of Twitter when she recently tweeted, “Repeal the Second Amendment.” The Louisiana state senator tweeted out Justice John Paul Stevens’ op-ed from last week in The New York Times calling for repealing the Second Amendment.  Her tweet got only 50 likes and just over 70 retweets, but it conjured up plenty of negative responses which would be far too numerous to try to list here. 

Now while I’m not sure what sort of response this DNC moron was expecting, I feel pretty confident in saying that it wasn’t the overwhelming response that she got.  Also her tweet pulls back the curtain a bit, and allows us a glimpse of what the true position of her party really is.  And despite all of the denials about wanting to repeal the Second Amendment, make no mistake that is in fact what the Democrats will be seeking to do if they are successful in their effort to take back Congress this November.  It will be after the impeachment of our duly elected president that next on their agenda will be the wholesale gutting of the Second Amendment. 

As I see it, these leftwing politicians, by calling for a ban or the repeal of the Second Amendment, are, in fact, in direct violation of their oath of office.  They swore to protect and defend the Constitution against ALL enemies, when they took office.  I see this rhetoric as being grounds for their removal from office, and being permanently barred from ever running again!  It’s sad that when tragedy does occur, our so-called leaders lose all rationale and go on some rant against the Constitution. They offer no hope or solution for the root cause of the problem. It’s like ramming a boat into an iceberg then blaming the boat for sinking, not the guy at the wheel.

The Democrat Party essentially came out of hiding during the Barry ‘O’ years in that Democrats stopped trying to hide what it is that their party stands for, and just how far to the left they have now become.  Where in the past Democrats were far more clandestine about where they stood on those specific issues viewed as being important by a majority of the American people, today it’s as if they don’t really give a crap what the people think.  They made much progress over the last eight years, to the point where they feel much more emboldened when it comes to revealing their true goals.  And while their candidate lost in 2016, that too may soon be rectified.  

The Democrat Party is still forced, albeit to a much lesser degree, to depend on deceit and deception in order to garner for itself a sufficient level of both support for the causes that it endorses and enough votes for those who continue to run under the Democrat banner.  But while the truth is coming out, Democrats can thank their many minions in the state-controlled media for providing them cover.  But despite their best efforts it becomes clearer every day that the Democrats have little interest in merely banning any one type of weapon, what they essentially want to do is to ban the Second Amendment or make it into something that is totally unrecognizable.    

The platform of the Democrat Party as it exists today is one that: 1) Has illegal immigrants being viewed as more important than American citizens, 2) Seeks to repeal tax cuts, 3) Seeks to allow men in women's rest rooms, 4) Seeks the repeal of the Second Amendment, 5) Seeks to severely limit the First Amendment, 6) Allows for and even encourages, unlimited, unvetted and unfettered third world immigration into this country, 7) And seek to eliminate any real education choosing instead to focus on the creating of politically correct, mind-numbed little robots through the complete and very thorough indoctrination of our young.

Make no mistake, if given the opportunity, Democrats will confiscate guns!  The American people must not allow them to take control of Congress this November.  We need to vote FOR America, vote FOR the Constitution, and vote FOR those who will work with the president and against liberal policies.  And I can already hear the grumbling about how even after we gave the Republicans first the House, then the Senate and finally the White House we still ended up with the Democrats still seeming to run the show.  Ok, I’m not thrilled that we elected a bunch of spineless wimps either.  But we can’t turn our backs on the country we’ll be leaving to our kids. 

And I can also now hear folks asking, “So where’s my incentive to vote Republican?”  Well, I guess my only answer would be that the time has now come for those of us who love this country and want to prevent it from going down the tubes entirely, to do more than simply sit back and complain about our crappy Republican leadership.  Obviously we can no longer trust them to do what’s right.  We must get much more involved in our political process.  I think we can all agree that the Democrats are in it for the long haul. And should they be able to regain control of Congress they will waste precious little time in trying to further restrict what few rights we have left.

For years those who proudly identify themselves as members of what has become an increasingly leftwing, and rather radical, Democrat Party have made the claim that nobody wants to take away anyone’s Second Amendment rights.  It's amazing how many on the left are now admitting they want nothing less than to rip up our Constitution, which is the most unique document of its kind ever created in all of human history, because it makes clear that our rights come to us from God.  The Democrats think our rights come only from government, a government that would also be free to take those rights away.  It that truly how most Americans wish to live?

Anyone who believes in the dismantling, or the reinterpreting, of our Constitutional, or feels that the government somehow possesses the power to infringe upon those rights contained therein, should be disqualified from ever holding, or even running for, ANY public office.  Because if one does not truly believe that all of the rights we possess as free people, as they are so very clearly laid out in our Constitution, come from God, then how is it that any oath that has one swearing to protect and defend that same Constitution has any meaning?  Our Constitution is the very soul of our Republic and as such it must be protected from those who seek only to destroy it. 

HITLERY, THE LYING LIAR…

The last presidential election, as those of us who keep track of such things are well aware, was just a few days shy of 18 months ago.  And with Hitlery, who seems to still be in search of a reason for how she ended up losing to President Donald Trump, has continued to spew the nonsense that 17 intelligence agencies all agreed that Russia meddled in the 2016 election in an effort to ensure she wasn’t elected.  But if that is in fact true, why was it that Barry ‘O’ did absolutely nothing to stop that alleged involvement, or to at least hinder it to the greatest extent possible?  The answer to that little mystery is easy.  He was so sure that Hiterly was going to win.   

And while we all know that Hitlery is prone to exaggerate, her continuing claims references the 2017 National Intelligence report that claimed with “high confidence” that Russia had meddled in the election.  But there’s just one problem: The report was compiled by three agencies, not 17. Only the CIA, FBI, and NSA worked to compile the report.  And while that claim was long ago debunked on more than one occasion, and by more than one ‘news’ organization, during the 18 months since the last election, those part of what was once referred to as the mainstream media have continued to push it.  So what we essentially have here is simply ‘fake news.’

Most recently, Jim Sciutto, over there at ‘Fake News Headquarters’, otherwise known as the Clown News Network (CNN), made the same claim yet again in mid-February.  The likely reason they’re so interested in pushing the claim is because 17 intelligence agencies sounds much more impressive and daunting than does three or four. There’s no evidence indicating that Russia’s efforts had any effect on the outcome of the election.  In fact, Russia’s stated goal in meddling was not to impact the outcome, but to weaken the American public’s trust in the government, a goal the mainstream media seems to have colluded with the Russians in trying to bring about.

The fact that Hitlery refuses to go away guarantees that she will remain in the news, at least with media sources that lean to the right.  The reason the Left-wing news media won't cover her, or do so at an absolute minimum, has to do with the fact that every time she opens her mouth, either here at home or abroad, she does little more than embarrasses herself and the Democrat Party.  Her numerous falling episodes, needing the assistance of two men to get her safely down some steps, resurrect all sorts of doubts and bad memories about her rather questionable health.  Most Democrats, if they’re being honest, would tell that they just want her to go away.

However the Republicans, on the other hand, don’t want her to go anywhere, they want Hitlery to keep talking and to keep whining about how it was that she views herself as being robbed of her rightful place as the first female U.S. president in an election that took place a year and a half ago. The Democrats want her to shut up and to go away but she refuses. That woman appears to have lost it.  She's the Democrats creation. Therefore, they own her.  They covered up for her and her illegal and outrageous behavior for decades. They made excuses for her and her sorry husband.  They now have to deal with the monster that they themselves created.

Let’s be honest, although her may supporters would claim otherwise, the fact is that Hitlery has been lying to anyone who would listen to her ever since her time on that committee investigating President Nixon and “Watergate” back in 1974.  All she's ever done, whether in Little Rock, the White House, in Congress or as Secretary of State, is LIE!!  Remember folks, it was then Secretary Hitlery who, at the casket ceremony at Andrews AFB, looked directing into the eyes of the family members of The Bengazi Dead and lied about how the death of their loved one's deaths was the result of some YouTube video.  And that’s just one of the more egregious lies that she has told.  

Hitlery could easily be in the ‘Guinness Books of World Records’ for the number of lies being told in the span of a single lifetime.  And while she will deny until she’s blue in the face that she herself has EVER told a single lie, she is certainly not the least bit shy when it comes to labeling others, especially those who happen to disagree with their rather radical leftwing political perspective.  They, or so she would like us to believe, are the most vile liars you’ll ever meet.  The number of lies she has told can be considered legendary, so why is it that the accusations of dishonesty she has made against others be taken with anything other than a grain of salt?

‘SLOW JOE’ BIDEN GIVES CONSERVATIVES A REASON TO VOTE IN NOVEMBER…

If freedom loving Americans were looking for a reason to vote come this November then this past Thursday, during a discussion at the University of Pennsylvania, ex-vice president ‘Slow Joe’ Biden can be considered as having handed it to them when he stated that the Second Amendment has been interpreted “badly” and the nation has decided it can no longer ignore the “prostitution” of the amendment.  An opportunist playing on nothing more than emotion, ‘Slow Joe’, more than anyone, knows how difficult it is to repeal an amendment, especially one of the original bill of rights and one which the ‘Founding Fathers’ saw fit to place such a level of importance on!

‘Slow Joe’ said, “I think there’s a Second Amendment. I think the Second Amendment is being very badly interpreted. It’s not consistent with what they’re — our founders intended, in my view. You saw Justice John Paul Stevens say that we should — because it’s been so prostituted, we should repeal the Second Amendment. It was about a standing militia. It’s a long story. I won’t go into all the legal side of that having taught it in law school. But there’s rational or irrational policy.”  Right, ‘Slow Joe’ ‘taught’ in law school much the same way Barry ‘O’ ‘taught’ the Constitution.  And it should come as no surprise that he would quote a liberal loon, like Stevens.

He added, “What’s happened here is, the nation as a whole has decided it can no longer, in my view, continue to turn a blind eye to the prostitution of the Second Amendment here, and no longer can turn a blind eye to the enormous damage being done, not just in our schools, but on our streets, right here in Philly and Wilmington, Delaware, where I’m from, every night.”  And rather than examine the destructive effects of Democrat policies, ‘Slow Joe’, like all Democrats, simply finds it much more convenient to blame the Second Amendment than to go looking for the real cause. That being, of course, the failed polices of dishonest leftwing politicians.

So according to ‘Slow Joe’, “What's happened here is, the Nation as a whole has decided that it can no longer turn a blind eye to the damage being done.” Really?  The “Nation” as a whole has decided that?  Well, that's pretty tough talk for sure, especially during some pompous elitist ‘question and answer’ taking place in some University safe-space!  But with that being said, here's my suggestion to ‘Slow Joe’ and every other Democrat out there who insists upon spewing such tripe.  Please put your money where your mouth is, and RUN ON THAT PLATFORM!  And we can start with those Democrat Senators who will be running for reelection in Red States.

Or, how about we go out and ask Joe Manchin, Heidi Heitkamp, Claire McCaskill or any of those same Democrats up for re-election what their opinion might be on what “the Nation as a whole” thinks about what ‘Slow Joe’ describes as the “prostitution of the Second Amendment.”  And I realize that Hitlery is WAY too busy blaming ignorant and weak white women for her loss to remember the facts, but the bottom line is that her running on gun control is one of the top reasons that she got her ass handed to her by a guy who was a political novice.  And, if gun control is such a winner for Democrats, then why did Barry ‘O’ never bother mentioning it until his second term?  

I seriously do hope that every single Democrat running for election, as well as those running for re-election, runs on that platform that has the calling for the repeal of the Second Amendment right at the top of their list.  But the fact is, that ‘Slow Joe’ is confusing the foulmouthed hysterical ravings of a bunch of ignorant adolescents, their handlers, and the state-controlled media, with what the “nation as a whole” actually believes!  Sorry Joe, but there is much more to the “nation as a whole” than the Northeast and the West Coast, and those who scream the loudest and make the most slanderous accusations do NOT represent the “nation as a whole.”

And let’s be real here, the killing going on in Democrat controlled cities is not the result of the Second Amendment. These crimes are being committed by criminals who do not obtain their guns legally.  So the only people misinterpreting the Second Amendment, are the Democrats.  Democrats like to point out how America is Number 3 in the world when it comes to the number of murders committed.  What they conveniently leave out is that if you remove from the equation Chicago, Detroit, DC, St. Louis and New Orleans we move to 189 out of 193 countries.  And what do these cities have in common?  That would be the fact that they are all run by Democrats!

Personally, I would argue that the Second Amendment protects the other nine amendments that comprise our ‘Bill of Rights’.  If you take away the right to defend one’s life, family and property, it becomes much easier for the government to do what it wants to you.  If we lose the Second Amendment it would likely be in very short order that we would lose all of our rights.  This is an organized campaign, folks. Everything is being coordinated from Democrat Party headquarters with input, and financial backing, from George Soros & Co.  There is now a concerted effort underway to restrict our Second Amendment right to the greatest extent possible.

The goal is to first demonize gun-rights groups like the National Rifle Association (NRA), to purposely misinterpret what the Second Amendment says and to malign legal gun owners.  Then the left will get their many useful idiots busy campaigning against our Second Amendment.  ‘Slow Joe’ is pitching a load of crap about the Second Amendment and obviously he’s already campaigning for president.  The bottom line is that the Democrats, and their agenda driven masters, think we're all stupid and that their attack on America, and on our Constitution, is somehow going to work for them.  It’s up to those who love this country to make sure that it doesn’t.

So it is in that effort that every single person in this country who owns a gun needs to make sure that they, and every member of their immediate, as well as of their extended, family goes out and votes Republican in this November’s midterm elections.  The Democrats have now made very clear what it is that they intend to do should they be able to regain control of Congress.  Number One on their list is, of course, to impeach our duly elected president.  And Number Two is to do everything that they possibly can to place strict limits on our Second Amendment right.  They may not be able to repeal it, but there is much they can do to reduce its effect. 

HITLERY ONCE AGAIN MAKES IT CLEAR THAT SHE’S NOT GOING ANYWHERE…

So everyone’s favorite two time loser of the presidential sweepstakes, Hitlery Clinton, has now once again made it abundantly clear that she has no intention of straying from the political stage.  She said that she’s not going to go away or stop talking about her concerns regarding President Trump, despite the noise coming from critics who want her off the public stage.  It was during a paid speech, albeit for 90 percent less than usual, at Rutgers University that Hitlery was asked by the moderator to respond to the critics who want her to “get off the public stage and shut up.”

She responded by saying, “They never said that to any man who wasn’t elected.”  To which those gathered in the audience applauded.  And of course she accused those in the media of leading the charge of asking that question, pointing out that it was, of course, sexist.  She pointed out that Al Gore continued talking about climate change after he lost the election and John Kerry-Heinz became Secretary of State and RINO John McCain returned to the Senate after he lost to Barry ‘O’.  But all of those ‘men’ were able to, at least to some degree, move on beyond their loss.

Hitlery said that she was committed to speaking out and having a voice in the modern political debate, despite losing to President Donald Trump.  But speaking out is one thing, but her constantly making excuses for and her endless whining about her loss to President Trump is something else entirely.  She said, “You won’t be surprised to hear me say that I have some concerns.”  And, she added, “I think we need to all be talking about it, not just me but every one of us needs to be speaking up and taking part.”  Her ONLY concern has been, and continues to be, the fact that she lost.

She said, “I have often thought that I am a kind of a Rorschach test for people who are trying to make sense, not just of me personally, but of women’s roles and women’s expanded opportunities, in not only America but around the world.”  Hitlery expressed disappointment that she is no longer seen as an individual because she has been in the public spotlight for 25 years.  She pointed out that she was “the first woman of my generation” as First Lady who had a law degree before going to the White House with her husband, which brought about “assumptions and caricatures.”  

Hitlery also pointed to her “monumental” role in working for health care reform as First Lady.  She said, “I would hope that people would spend a little bit of time actually looking behind the image or the picture, and that is I think is what we hope for all of us, we want to be known as who we are and judged positively and negatively based on what we actually do and not by what people said we did.”  Now when you stop and consider what she’s saying here, this is exactly why most people feel the way they do about Hitlery, they’re judging her on what she’s actually done.

She also warned the audience that they should be prepared to experience people who want to pull back opportunities and progress for women.  She said, “You have to understand that’s part of breaking through glass ceilings and moving forward and bringing others with you.”  And she went on to say, “You cannot allow yourselves to get discouraged about that because it’s going to happen.”  That is simply just so much BS.  Hitlery was not not elected because she is a women, she was not elected because there were enough people who were not in favor of her socialist approach.

And then it was at one point that the moderator invoked Nazism when talking about what “could happen” in America.  Hitlery’s long-winded response touched on a number of things, including the “absolutely essential role of the press.”  She said, “Well, I am fundamentally optimistic and hopeful, but I don’t think that optimism and hope is warranted unless we do what we’re supposed to do as citizens.”  She added, “And so, I worry about the degradation of institutions, the dismissing of norms and values–because remember, a democracy is fundamentally held together by trust.”

Hitlery said she’s worried “about whether our Constitution is going to be honored, whether we will see the rule of law protected, whether we will have the predictability and stability we need in the foreign affairs.”  All of which was, I thought, rather odd coming from someone whose political party wants to limit free speech like the Nazis did, wants to Nationalize Health Care like the Nazis did, wants to disarm the populace like the Nazis did and who sent thugs to disrupt the rallies of their political rivals, like the Nazis did!  So what’s she talking about here? 

Finally, the failed presidential candidate addressed the question.  She said, “So I’m hoping that the worst, the kind of question you asked me, Ruth, is just never even approached, we never get to that.  But, it will require people turning up and voting in these midterm elections, and it will require a lot of Republicans to take back their party and to put their country back into the equation, for the Republican Party going forward. And it will not be easy.”  In other words we Republicans, at least according to Hitlery, need to see the error of our ways and elect fewer conservatives.

But seriously folks, I kinda like Hitlery being on stage and not shutting up.  I enjoy all of those slip and fall moments, and how her mind tends to wander when she’s trying to answer the simplest of questions.  Poor liberals with their heads exploding because she won't shut up.  I still like to think that she’ll be convicted of something, but I’m just not going to hold my breath.  Hopefully as more things come to light in the search for collusion between Trump and Russians something will be found that seals HER fate.  It would be nice to see her in a one piece orange prison jump suit.

Hitlery really has no idea how vile people, outside of her circle of supporters, think she is.  On a side note, I was watching Tucker Carlson earlier this week and he had one of her die hard supporters, Jennifer Palmieri, on his show to discuss primarily the issue of gun control as it relates to the Democrat Party.  And as is always the case with someone like Palmieri when the subject of Hitlery this dolt Palmieri argued how Hitlery is seen by so many as being such an accomplished women yet she still lost the election because…wait for it… she’s a woman.  Which caused Tucker to chuckle.    

But anyway, in getting back on topic, Hitlery would probably claim that men don't have to be likable so why should she have to, completely ignoring the fact that hubby Slick Willy’s ability to charm people was the real key to his success.  Slick told people the things they wanted to hear, meanwhile Hitlery forces people to listen to what she wants to say.  She wants to blame her gender for her failure, but the blame rests on her lack of authenticity and her general disdain for so many Americans.  Remember all us ‘Deplorables?’  How we’re all just a bunch of racist, misogynistic homophobes?

Hitlery’s rather sizable ego, second only to that of Barry ‘O’, insures that she remains tone deaf to the political realities of her own party.  Even the most far left moonbats are smart enough to know that she's hurting their warped cause by hanging around whining about why she lost an election that occurred over 17 months ago.  She's an embarrassment to a party that is usually unable to recognize when they've been embarrassed, and that's saying something!  And, she should be an embarrassment to every intelligent woman who views herself as being responsible and self-reliant.

Hitlery’s the gift that keeps on giving.  The Democrats will have to be the ones to bring out the hook to yank her off the stage and I’m not sure that even now there is anyone willing to do that.  So as long as she keeps talking and injects herself onto political scene I think it's a positive for our side.  It's the same with gun control, let the Democrats and their ‘surrogates’ continue to make it their position that the Second Amendment should be repealed and that confiscation is their ultimate goal.  Because it does little more than to harden the position against them. 

DAVID HOGG, JUST ANOTHER USEFUL IDIOT AND TOO STUPID TO KNOW IT…

So it would seem that this kid, Hogg, is working on making the absolute most of his 15 minutes of fame, trying to stretch it just as far as he possibly can.  And apparently he doesn’t mind in the least that he’s being used by so many on the left in his effort to do so.  Which only tells me that kid has no class, no brains, no self-respect and apparently no bring-‘em-ups.  Yes I’m quite sure mommy and daddy are very proud of the offspring their union produced.  Obviously this kid gives some level of credence to that old adage that says, ‘Some people just shouldn’t be allowed to reproduce.’

And it’s in the process of his allowing himself to be used by those on the left, in its continuing effort to remove guns from the hands of law-abiding citizens, that the young Mr. Hogg’s ego seems to be growing at a rather incredible rate evidenced by how he takes himself far too seriously.  Apparently this little creep is now leading a boycott campaign against Fox News host Laura Ingraham after she knocked him for complaining about colleges that rejected his applications.  He apparently took offense at that and has now called on his ‘followers’ to put pressure on her advertisers.

You see, it was this past Wednesday morning that Ingraham wrote on Twitter, “David Hogg Rejected By Four Colleges To Which He Applied and whines about it,” and she linked a Daily Wire article that referenced a TMZ article titled, “I’m Changing the World …BUT UC SCHOOLS STILL REJECTED ME.”  Anyway, Hogg responded by tweeting out a list of Ingraham’s 12 biggest advertisers and called on his ‘followers’ to pressure the companies into boycotting Ingraham’s show over her tweet.  And it was much to my surprise that Ingraham has now apologized, which only adds fuel to the fire.  

Hogg was interviewed on TMZ this past Monday and it was during that interview that he lamented a number of college rejections he has received.  He said he was not surprised by the rejections because “I think there’s a lot of amazing people that don’t get to college, not only that do things like I do but because their voices just aren’t heard in the tsunami of people that apply every year to colleges in such an economic impacted school system here which we have here in America where people have to go into massive amounts of debt just to go to college and get an education.” 

Look, this useful idiot really is nothing more than a butt-hurt little dweeb. If he's going to up against the big guns, then he shouldn’t be surprise to get a little blowback and he should take it like man.  But when those on our side cower before threats made by little weasels like this Hogg character, all that does is to encourage more bad behavior and gives new life to their pathetic antics.  And the longer the left feels that they have something to gain from milking this kid for all he’s worth, the longer we can expect to see him being held up as some sort of symbol for their cause.

But mark my words there will come a time when those on the left now very loudly singing his praises will become fewer and fewer in number until finally there is simply no one left but Mr. Hogg himself.  Because let there be no doubt that when you get right down to it, the young Mr. Hogg means absolutely nothing to them, he is simply someone to be used in the name of advancing their anti-gun cause.  And as soon as they tire of him, or as soon as he becomes no longer useful to them, they will kick his worthless butt to the curb.  And before long it will be, David who?   

And while this boob has no problem whatsoever with wanting to take away from millions of Americans their Second Amendment right, he cries foul, or he whines, whenever he thinks his First Amendment right is being infringed upon.  Really?   The left has sure done a pretty good job turning him into what is really nothing more than a good little Marxist. Unfortunately this is what we tend to get by sending our children to public school.  And they are doing the same thing to a lot of our kids in our public schools. This shooting was just an opportunity to step on the accelerator. 

This is nothing that we haven’t seen before coming from those on the left.  They get their hooks into some impression, sometimes young, stooge who quickly becomes addicted to all of the attention and who then willingly allows himself, or herself, to be used like some puppet on a string.  And then when they finally snap out of their little trance, they realize that all of those who were once so enamored with them have now moved on and found themselves some new little stooge to make dance on the end of their string.  This kid is doing nothing more than making a fool of himself.

JIMMY CARTER, BLAMING THE NRA…

I’m pretty sure that it won’t come as much of a surprise that the fella who, were it not for Barack Hussein Obama would have continued wearing the moniker of ‘Worst President in American History’, is another of those corrupt politicians who denies knowing why it is that the Second Amendment exists.  Which is, of course, as that last line of defense against a tyrannical government.  And while our all-knowing and all seeing federal government has yet to reach that point, those paying attention see it as moving ever closer with each passing day. Thank the Founding Fathers for having had the wisdom to provide the citizens with the Right to safeguard their freedom.

And so it was on this past Tuesday on the Communist Broadcasting System, aka CBS, that ex-president Jimmy Carter claimed during an interview “CBS This Morning,” that the National Rifle Association (NRA) represents the interests of gun manufactures and sellers, not gun owners.  And talking about student gun control activists, Jimmy said, “I just hope and pray they will be persistent in their commitment and they will continue to use their influence on adults that who have reached voting age already, and when they reach voting age they will be willing to turn out of office the people who have abjectly submitted themselves to the domination of the NRA.”

And Jimmy added, “The NRA basically represents gun manufacturers and sellers instead of the average hunters and people who use guns for their own defense. I think the distortion of the Second Amendment has been a mistake. There is no threat to the Second Amendment among the side of young people to have good background checks before you can buy a weapon and you can do away with the rapid-fire military weapons that we have authorized.”  Once again it’s Jimmy who seems to go out of his way to make sure we all remember just how dishonest he truly is.  Like any of us who were around during his presidency would ever really forget.  Not hardly!

Look, there is but one reason that this bonehead was ever elected president in the first place, and that’s because he was simply in the right place at the right time, politically speaking.  Watergate was still very fresh in the minds of the American people and many were upset with the fact that President Ford pardoned Nixon.  That and Jimmy didn’t ‘appear’ as some crazy left wing bomb-throwing-dictator-wannabe.  And of course we didn’t have Fox News or the Internet to give us both sides.  And there was the media running in lock step with no push back as there was NO talk radio because the ‘Fairness Doctrine’ was still very much in effect!

Let’s face it, Jimmy has always had a rather difficult relationship with the truth.  Now, according to Jimmy, we are not only controlled by guns, we are controlled by their manufacturers as well.  It seems that guns have their own type of derangement syndrome.  Guns, guns and more guns, it’s all about guns, or is it?  Because what it’s really all about is banning the private ownership of guns, which, by the way, would be enforced by people WITH guns, so that we the disarmed masses would have no way of protecting ourselves against their intended, and highly desired, brand of tyranny.  They are fine with well-armed storm troopers just not a well-armed citizenry.

If the government were to tell you tomorrow that you no longer had freedom of speech, and that if you were to say something considered by that same government to be ‘the wrong thing’ and for that offense you would be jailed, how would you be able to resist? Despite the claims made by Jimmy and his leftist cohorts it’s the Second Amendment that protects all the rest of your rights by providing you a means of resisting tyranny!  It’s not about hunting or target shooting, it’s about providing ‘We the People’ with the ultimate means of resistance!  Resistance from what it is that Jimmy and his friends on the left dream about inflicting upon this country.

Why is it that when it comes to this most recent shooting in Florida and this silly made-for-TV ‘March for our Lives’, that none of the players mention how it was that we had a Sheriff’s Deputy standing outside while the shooting took place, how the County Sheriff set up a parameter instead of rushing in to save lives, or why the police, after 38 visits to this kid’s house, had no idea there was an issue, OR why the FBI, after receiving a tip that there was a threat that he was going to blow, did not take the time to go to check out the tip?  None of these things are talked about, because it’s easier to blame the gun or the NRA, than say government screwed up!

Can we all agree that Jimmy is nothing more than a pathological liar? The NRA has millions of members and we are not gun manufacturers.  What we are, are folks who love our country, our freedom and our Constitution, unlike Jimmy and the rest of his Godless Democrats.  His lies are believed only by those who call the Democrat Party home.  He makes the argument for wanting to take our guns using the false premise that by doing so we can prevent loss of life, while it’s the same time that Jimmy and his friends actively advocate for the wholesale butchering of over a million defenseless baby's every single year through abortion for both convenience and profit.  

The long term goal of the left is to make it so we are all as defenseless as those over 60 million babies that they’ve had no problem whatsoever with killing since Roe versus Wade.  This quest of the left to seize our guns has nothing whatsoever to with children, or cutting the level of gun violence or even with public safety.  It, as had been said so many times before, has EVERYTHING to do with control and about power.  Control of, and power over, the people.  And Jimmy’s idiotic rant about how the NRA somehow only supporting gun manufactures proves just how ignorant and blatantly dishonest he truly his.  But then this is how those on the left operate.  

‘CREEPY UNCLE JOE’ DOING HIS BEST TO MOTIVATE HIS TEAM…

If there was ever any doubt remaining among those on the right that the number one priority for the Democrats, should they be permitted to regain control of Congress this November, will be the impeachment of President Trump, old ‘Slow Joe’ Biden essentially removed all such doubt in a speech he gave last week. Ex-vice president ‘Slow Joe’ warned House Democrats that President Donald Trump ‘will’ win a second term if the Democrats do not take back the House this November.

Biden reportedly warned those members gathered for something called the House Democrats’ Blue Collar Caucus last week by saying, “If we don’t win the House, Trump is there for eight years.” Biden reportedly added: “I’m serious. So, no pressure.”  Members were said to have been ‘stunned.’  Now knowing Democrats as we all do, what we really heard coming from ‘Slow Joe’ was nothing more than a call to arms, an order to get to work on a plan for massive Democrat voter fraud.   

I think it safe to say that the Democrats are now clearly salivating over the possibility of regaining control of Congress and therefore having subpoena power allowing them to go about endlessly investigating the Trump administration.  Some Democrats, like ‘Mad Maxine’ Waters, are hoping that they can take back the House to start impeachment proceedings even though Waters’ critics on the left think the party could overplay its hand and turn off crucial swing voters if they pursue impeachment.

And while many on the left think taking back the House by way of some “blue wave” is pretty much of a given, a new Brennan Center report found that to do so, Democrats “would need to win the national popular vote in 2018 by the biggest margin in a midterm since 1982.”  The report found, “Because of maps designed to favor Republicans, Democrats would need to win by a nearly unprecedented nationwide margin in 2018 to gain control of the House of Representatives.”

And this same report went on to say, “To attain a bare majority, Democrats would likely have to win the national popular vote by nearly 11 points. Neither Democrats nor Republicans have won by such an overwhelming margin in decades. Even a strong blue wave would crash against a wall of gerrymandered maps.”  Rumor has it that ‘Slow Joe’s’ advisers are reportedly planning for a 2020 presidential run, and oddly enough he is considered by many to be the party’s early frontrunner.

But the ex-vice president, whose first presidential campaign was derailed by a plagiarism scandal, would likely be forced to contend with his rather creepy reputation for fondling young women and his penchant for exposing himself to female Secret Service agents.  Frankly it’s this kind of behavior that would seem to make him the ideal Democrat candidate for president.  But he’s thus far said that the “jury’s still out” on whether or not he will seek to challenge President Trump.

While the Democrats are desperate to win come this November so they can then begin work on impeaching Trump, it’s still going to be up to the voters.  And if voters want to go back to the last lousy eight years of a stagnant economy and decimated military, then they’ll likely choose Democrats.  The economy is getting better. We just have to get rid of the RINOs and as many Democrats as possible.  Ryan and McConnell must be replaced with leaders who truly care about our country.

Democrats depend on a constant, renewable source of low information, low IQ and government dependent voters.  That’s the primary reason they so aggressively encourage illegal immigration, form sanctuary cities and states, and legal support for illegal immigrants.  That’s why they are in favor of open, porous borders and why they even refuse to make English the national language.  Their causes are funded by left-wing donors whose intent is clear, that being the destruction of America.  

Hopefully there will still be enough of us voting this November who remember well what it was like during the two years (2009-2010) that had the Democrats running the House and Senate with Barry ‘O’ in the White House.  Together they made life very difficult for those who work for a living.  Come this November working-class Americans must go to the polls focused on denying the Democrats control of the House and Senate, and on throwing out as many of their RINO brethren as we can.

The mid-term elections will be decided by responsible Republican, Conservative and Independent voters who go to the polls.  Granted, our congressional Republicans have done precious little to encourage them to vote Republican.  Yet it will be they who must ensure that both houses of Congress remain firmly under Republican control.  Now if these folks decide to sit this one out and Democrats, living and dead, do turn out in large numbers then I fear for the future of our country.

Commonsense should tell us that despite whatever disagreements we may have with the president we must make sure that it’s the Republicans who keep control of Congress.  And because Democrats appear to be somewhat energized, they will be dredging up every illegal, low-life and deceased vote they can find.  And by allowing the Democrats to take control of Congress we become little more than accomplices in what will surely become their determined effort to impeach the president.   

While the Republicans would likely fare much better without the likes of McConnell, Ryan, Graham and McCain, to name but a few, hanging around their neck, we go into every election with the party that we have, not with the party that we wish we had.  And while Democrats would do much to help their cause by slapping a muzzle on Hitlery, Pelosi, Waters, and any number of other of their more radical kooks within their party, that’s not likely to happen.  Which in turn provides ammo to our side.   

Trump is struggling against Democrat opposition to everything he does, and the rules of the Senate which allow this level of pure obstructionism.  If he found a cure for cancer they would likely oppose it.  The media, the majority of the super wealthy, the Democrat stacked courts, and opposition within his own party have more than a little to do with his inability to fulfill some of his campaign promises.  That should enter into one’s assessment of President Trump’s performance.  Don’t you think?

Look, you can be the best ‘deal maker’ on the planet, but it still takes two to make a deal.  And the Democrats have no intention of making any sort of a deal on any issue unless said deal is strictly in their favor.  And in that scenario it’s not really a deal, it capitulation.   Now I was far from happy when the president chose not to veto the recent spending bill.  But that said, I’ve not yet moved into the camp of those willing to allow the Democrats to simply walk to victory come this November.