THE “CLIMATE CHANGE” INSANITY INTENSIFIES WITH THE “GREEN NEW DEAL”…

It was just recently that we heard from Democrats about how the combating of supposed ‘climate change’ is the equivalent of fighting the Nazis in World War II or putting a man on the Moon.  Both of which I thought were peculiar analogies for combating something that the vast majority of Americans doubt even exists.  While those on the left continue to tout is as being ‘settled science’, that’s far from being the case.  The most recent ‘master plan’ for combating this manufactured crisis comes to us in the form of something called, ‘The Green New Deal.’  And Democrats apparently see ‘climate change’ as their best way to defeat President Trump.

And it was Democrat Chris Murphy who recently said that despite claims to the contrary, this green new deal resolution, which calls for meeting 100 percent of the power demand in the U.S. through clean, renewable and zero emission energy sources, is “absolutely realistic.”  He was recently interviewed there at ‘fake news’ headquarters, aka CNN, and it was faux journalist Jake Tapper who mentioned that Angus King, who is an ‘Independent from Maine who caucuses with Democrats, and Barry ‘O’s former Energy Secretary, Ernest Moniz, have said that they don’t think Murphy’s plan is very realistic.  But realistic or not, it’s seems to be gaining support.

And it was in taking offense at such remarks, Murphy said, “I think it's absolutely realistic, and I frankly think we need to set our sights high. I think there are a lot of people who said that it wasn't realistic for the United States to get a man on the moon by the end of the 1960s when President Kennedy initially outlined that goal, but we did it, and I think we have to set our sights high.”  He said, “I have a 10-year-old and 7-year-old. Global warming is an existential threat to the planet, and so if we don't command this country to think big about saving our nation and our world from destruction, then I don't think we're going to get close to meeting the mark.”

It was last Friday that Murphy, along with fellow Democrats ‘Lying Dick’ Blumenthal, Edward ‘Malarkey’ Markey and one of the newest members of Congress, the rather simplistic Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez introduced a bicameral resolution calling for a Green New Deal.  Murphy said in a statement on his website: “Climate change is the most pressing problem facing our generation.”  And he goes on to say, “It is already posing a security threat to our nation, and we are feeling its impacts in real time. We need bold ideas if we’re going to rise to meet this challenge.”  However, it’s obvious that one man’s “bold ideas” is another man’s silly idealistic crusade.

The Green New Deal Resolution lays out the goals and projects for a ten-year national mobilization to:

•Build resiliency against climate change-related disasters;

•Repair and upgrade U.S. infrastructure;

•Meet 100 percent of our power demand through clean, renewable, and zero-emission energy sources;

•Build or upgrade to energy-efficient, distributed and “smart” power grids;

•Upgrade all existing U.S. buildings and build new buildings, to achieve maximum energy efficiency;

•Spur massive growth in clean U.S. manufacturing and remove pollution and greenhouse gas emissions from manufacturing and industry;

•Work with farmers and ranchers to remove pollution and greenhouse gas emissions from the agriculture sector;

•Overhaul U.S. transportation systems;

•Remove greenhouse gases and reduce pollution, including by restoring our natural ecosystems through proven low-tech solutions;

•Restore and protect threatened, endangered, and fragile ecosystems;

•Clean up existing hazardous waste and abandoned sites;

•Make the United States the international leader on climate action and help other countries achieve a Green New Deal.

But things get even more bizarre the further that we dig into this boondoggle, because this ‘Green New Deal’ also “includes the goals of guaranteeing that all members of society can have a job with a family-sustaining wage and are provided with high-quality health care; affordable, safe, and adequate housing; economic security; and access to a clean environment.”  Of all the supposed gimmicks ever devised to combat this nonexistent threat, this ‘green new deal’ has to be the nuttiest proposal ever to be conceived.  Instead of taking this political nonsense seriously, anyone who admits to supporting it should be locked up in a padded room.

It was arguably one of the most embarrassing, yet revealing, political disclosures on the steps of the Capitol in quite some time.  Ms. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, declared by some to be a “rock star”, read from a prepared script that was badly in need of a major edit. The laundry list of goals outlined in the ‘Green New Deal’ (which she actually didn’t write) was so childish, so lacking in commonsense, it made clear to the world these new Democrats in Congress suffer from a rather shocking lack of both intelligence and perspective.   Was it really that bad?  Yes it was, and I wouldn’t be surprised to find out much of it was bought and paid for by our ‘friends’ in China.   

In a nut shell, this ‘Green New Deal’ will result in nothing more than the federal government taking control of all properties; whether farms, ranches, homes, office buildings; the use of all forms of transportation; air, train, auto, walking, bus; over every industry, what industries; over every product produced.  And in its crusade to conquer “climate change”, having covered every available plot of land with windmills and solar panels with the population facing world-wide starvation, the ruling elitists will have a change of heart. They will come to tell the masses that a new study reveals oil, gas, coal and nuclear were "clean and renewable" after all.  Who knew?

Something that Murphy and his many ‘climate change’ compatriots never speak of is the fact that well over 13,000 qualified American scientists have proclaimed, repeatedly, and been suppressed by both the media and politicians, that there is absolutely no scientific proof that there is any ‘climate change’ that can be traced to human activities. Furthermore, during the last 24 months we have one of the most significant cool downs of the global ‘mean’ temperature on record.  And despite the claim made by Al Gore that the polar ice caps would be devoid of all ice by 2010, here we are on 2019 with there now being more ice at the poles than ever before.

That this ‘climate change’ nonsense continues to be what the Democrats seem to have pinned their hopes on for defeating President Trump is something that I find, quite frankly, more than a little strange.  Also now we have ‘Con Man’ Cory Booker out there declaring that “this planet simply cannot sustain people eating meat.”   I can’t help but wonder who, but the most committed Democrats, takes any of this craziness seriously. Climate change continues to be a theory in search of any actual scientific proof of its existence.  Because any science used to support its existence has been up to this point highly suspect to say the least.  It’s a manufactured crisis. 

And when you stop and consider the fact that 99.9 percent of all those who profess to have some level of belief in what is really nothing more than a scam to redistribute wealth, are all on the left, shouldn’t that cause one to pause.  And the continuing insults and name-calling directed at those who remain unconvinced, or at least a bit skeptical, should also cause one to question the motivation of those behind the perpetuating of the yet to be proven theory of ‘climate change.’  And ask yourself, have you ever been as certain about anything in your life, as these people are about ‘climate change’?  I know I haven’t.   It’s a religion to some of these people.

HER HIGHNESS HITLERY: “THERE IS NO NATIONAL EMERGENCY AT THE BORDER!!”

When trying to determining if that which is now taking place at our southern border might actually qualify as a national emergency, who better to answer that question than Hitlery, that two time loser in the arena of presidential politics.  That said, it was just this past Sunday on something called, “The Circus”, which is broadcast on ‘Showtime’, that Hitlery made it quite clear that President Trump should not declare a national emergency to build a wall along the U.S.-Mexico border because she argued there is “no national emergency at our border.”  But as is so often the case with Democrats, one person’s national emergency is another person’s voter drive.  Because make no mistake, if we’re being honest here, that’s exactly what’s taking place.

Hitlery said, “I just don’t think you should call national emergencies unless there truly is a national emergency. There’s no national emergency at our border. And he’s frustrated because he can’t even get his own party to support his request. And he shouldn’t be breaking new ground and causing new precedents that really may come back to not only haunt him, but our country. He should go through regular order. He couldn’t get Congress when he had Republican control. He can’t get it now. Then work with Congress. Every Democrat, every Republican wants to do what is right to secure our border. They disagree with his demand that there is only one way to do that.”  I’m sure she sees no need, whatsoever, for any urgent action to be taken.

But if she doesn’t see what’s taking place at the borders as qualifying as a national emergency then I’d like to know what it is that might meet Hitlery’s criteria for doing so. Now keep in mind that Gallup says five million Latin Americans plan to migrate to the U.S. in the next 12 months, and an estimated 42 million more say they want to enter.  To my way of thinking, if that doesn't constitute a national emergency then I don't know what does.  Make no mistake, this is a wholesale invasion of our country, and it must be stopped by all available means.  Because if we fail, we will lose the country and follow in the footsteps of Europe, never to return.  But then, that’s exactly what the Democrats and they’re allies on the left would like to see happen.

Look, you don’t need to be a genius to be able to recognize that it’s the Left in this country that represents a bona fide national emergency!  The Left, of which Hitlery is most definitely a proud member, wants nothing less than to destroy America as we know it, and by any means necessary. And if this onslaught of illegal immigrants is not national emergency then may I ask, what the Hell is?  The Democrats need a new voting bloc, that’s clear. And the RINOs want to keep labor costs down, that’s also very clear. And it’s the behavior of both that should now be considered as being nothing short of treasonous. This is not why we elect these people, but then once they are safely sworn in it matters little why they were elected, only that they were.

For anyone not looking through the prism of politics it’s become painfully obvious that what we see going on at our southern border, and on a daily basis, has now become a national emergency.  We are a sovereign nation, and as such we have borders, and we should be able to keep outside those borders all except those who come with some skill or ability that allows them to contribute to making our country better.  Simply being willing to work for less than those who are born here, or those who come here legally, should not be viewed as a sufficient reason for entry.  Americans are required by our country to pay taxes, abide by the laws and in some cases to give up our children in protecting America. Our country owes us the ability to protect ourselves.

And does anyone doubt that if there was a snowball’s chance in Hell that even a fraction of those coming into this country illegally would be voting for Republicans as soon as they could get their grubby little hands on a ballot, that every single Democrat, Hitlery included, would be screaming at the top of their lungs about there being a national emergency on the southern border and about the need to build a wall as a high as one could be built.  But since that is not the case all we continue to hear from Democrats is about how it’s either immoral to want to build a wall or just plain racist.  Hence we end up where we are with President Trump being left with few options of getting done that which he promised us he would do, build ‘The Wall.’     

Unfortunately, Hitlery, like ex-president Barry, is still doing enormous damage to this nation even though she are no longer ‘officially employed’ in our government. Both are receiving financial support from anti-American, special interest groups and both are working against this nation.  She was selected to complete the destruction of this country that was begun by Barry.  Just be thankful that that didn’t happen. Hitlery needs to go back into the woods. She seems oblivious to the effects of illegal entry across our southern border.  Crime, drugs, people with communicable diseases, job displacement, demands on healthcare and infrastructure, schools, etc. This view by Hitlery is common among Democrats, ALL of whom want open, porous borders.

CHUCKIE SCHUMER PANICS OVER ‘CLIMATE CHANGE’…

It was in sounding like some soon-to-be-supporter of that cockamamie boondoggle called the ‘Green New Deal’, that none other than that very well-known climate scientist, Chuckie Schumer recently took to the floor of the U.S. Senate to deliver a speech the central point of which, of course, was to criticize President Trump for his State of the Union Address.  Chuckie’s bone of contention, among other things, was that the president failed to even mention the issue of “climate change,” which we all know is an issue that is very near and dear to the heart of EVERY Democrat.  

Chuckie said, “He talked about the future of America and didn’t even mention climate change.”  And added, “How could you do that? Chuckie claimed, “Every scientist who has studied it knows that in the next 10, 20, 30 or 40 years, climate change is going to evoke huge changes in our country and in our world.”  He went on to say, “If you believe in the future and you want to have a good future for our children and grandchildren, which we all do, you can’t ignore climate change.”  He said, “You may have different views on it, but you can’t ignore it,” he said.

Now let’s just say for the sake of argument that Chuckie and his fellow America-hating colleagues there in the Democrat Party are right in all of their claims about ‘Climate change’, ‘global warming’, ‘climate disruption’ or WHATEVER they wish to call it.  If both, the Arctic and Antarctic polar ice caps were to melt completely, and New York City, San Francisco, Seattle, Los Angeles and every other large Democrat-infested coastal metropolitan area were to become inundated with tsunami waves and flooding like we've never seen, would that necessarily be a bad thing? 

And another thing, it’s on one hand that Chuckie claims to be just oh so concerned about our children and grandchildren and yet the other hand he seems to have absolutely no problem whatsoever with allowing women the RIGHT to murder those very same children and grandchildren, even AFTER they have been born.  That, to me, is the worst kind of hypocrisy.  To the point I can’t help but wonder how is it that anyone bothers to even listen to this guy.  There is NOTHING true or real in ANYTHING that he says.  Everything, and I mean everything, he says has it purpose in politics. 

But let’s be real, I think it goes without saying that the odds are pretty good that our climate will change over the course of the next 40 years, or even the next 12 years.  It always has in the past and so we should expect it to continue to change in the future.  What should we do about it?  Well, we do what our ancestors have always done, we adapt.  Our ancestors knew enough to come in out of the rain or to wear a garment when it was cold and to take that garment off when it got hot. God gave most folks a brain, the ability to feel cold and heat and the commonsense to adapt.

It is a provable scientific fact that our climate has changed over the years, therefore it is more than reasonable to assume that it will continue to change into the future. But, anyone that actually believes that mankind has any power and/or control over this is either sadly mistaken or is purposely lying for some agenda driven reason. I remember very well when Al Gore was preaching back in the 1970's that the next ice age was upon us if we didn't change our ways! There are people in this world that want to control people and their resources. That is what this is really all about!

It's just incredible to me that we still have people like Chuckie, and his brothers-in-arm there on the left, who actually seem to think that they are somehow more powerful than God Himself! They always say that scientists that study ‘climate change’ always find it alarming, but, they never reference the majority of scientists who disagree.  Fluctuations in our climate are going to occur, it’s a no brainer, and we should avoid reading too much into them. And we should also resist being convinced that there is actually something we can do to have any impact on them.

Make no mistake, the Senator from Wall Street is not in the habit of making predictions, what he does is to announce his intentions. There is a goal here, one talked about only when behind closed doors.  You see, once the left has succeeded in reducing white Christians to a small minority, completely disarmed, and replaced by the third world hoards that they are now actively encouraging to come here, they will use their archaic environmental laws to reduce their indentured servants to the same level of genteel poverty that they fled when enticed to come to this country.

THE DEMOCRATS COME OUT OF THEIR SOCIALIST CLOSET…

What is it about this president that has caused so many within the Democrat Party to suddenly become so willing to reveal their inner Socialist and to appear so eager to finally operate out in the bright light of day as those who we have always thought that they were.  It would seem that with the election of President Trump, something strange has come over a great many of those leftist who consider themselves proud ‘Democrats’.  And it seems to have brought about a sense of liberation for both elected members, as well as the leaders, of the Democrat Party to the point where they now no longer the least bit shy about admitting who they are and what it is that they wish to bring about in this country.  

From being willing to murder babies fresh from the womb to the recent publication of something called the “Green New Deal,” Democrats can now be said to be totally out of the closet, allowing the American people, for the first time in a very long time, to see them for exactly who, and what, they are.  Before President Trump, Democrats had always been much less forthcoming when it came to revealing what it was that they were really up to.  But it would seem that these days, for whatever reason, they see no reason to operate in the shadows.  It’s almost as if they want us to see just how crazy they have become.  And the president should do nothing to discourage them from talking, in fact he should encourage them to talk more.

And it’s this “Green New Deal” that is the latest utopian idea to be presented by the Democrats, and is also arguably one of the most insane idea they’ve ever come up despite being championed by the genius, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez.  It reveals much about just how out in the open the Democrat Party is now willing to operate.  And regardless of how insane it is, this cockamamie plan was promptly endorsed by at least five candidates for the Democrat nomination for president in 2020, including the current frontrunner, Kamala Harris.  And it’s upon closer inspection that this highly touted “Green New Deal” has got to be seen as being one of the craziest, if not THE craziest, bits of legislation ever conceived in all of modern day politics. 

And I can’t help but wonder why this entire idea isn’t being ridiculed to the point where its supporters have been forced to go into hiding out of fear of becoming a laughing stock for daring to support it.  After all, the plan calls for the entire U.S. economy to switch to solar and wind power in ten years, an end to air travel, and guaranteed jobs for all, including those “unwilling” to work.  It will be paid for by printing more and more money. And if you dare to disagree, the planet will die.  While this “Green New Deal” is not the first crazy idea ever to be proposed in Congress, it is the first crazy idea to be taken so seriously and to be co-sponsored by as many as ten U.S. Senators and a third of House Democrats, so far. 

A close second would be “Medicare for All,” which Kamala Harris endorsed last month, adding that she would “eliminate” private health insurance — though she later said she was open to other paths to socialized medicine.  “Medicare for All” is not even popular in Harris’s deep-blue home state of California, where a plurality of voters opposes the plan, according to a Quinnipiac poll released this week. Yet the same poll revealed that the policy is very popular among Democrats, with 61% in favor and 24% opposed. When Assembly Speaker Anthony Rendon, Democrat, blocked a similar idea in 2017, saying there was no way to pay for it, he received death threats.  Many Democrats have long believed in having the government run everything.

Democrats have convinced themselves that the best way to beat President Trump is to emulate him, at least the version of him that they have in their heads.  They see him as a fascist, so they feel emboldened to share their radical views. They are told by the media that he is a liar, so they simply make things up. They believe the border wall was a cynical gimmick, so they have adopted catchy labels like “Green New Deal,” regardless of substance.  What they fail to understand is that for all his bluster, Trump is a conventional president, whose beliefs are well within the mainstream of American politics, whose policies have restored the constitutional balance and helped the “working class” Democrats claim to represent.

Of the many flaws inherent to collectivism, it is ALWAYS pushed by the same people who have never run a business, never met a payroll, often never even had a real private sector job.  And yet they see themselves as ALWAYS knowing better how things should run than those who do it, or have done it, for a living.  The level of ignorance and of arrogance is unbelievable.  But Capitalism, like Republicanism, requires a moral population in order to make it all work. Actually, ANY system does. But Socialism and Communism dump any semblance of moral restraint right off the bat in favor of ‘enlightened government officials’, and since power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely, it is Katy bar the door.

Democrats will never admit that Capitalism is the only financial system ever proven to lift entire populations out of poverty and provide a higher standard of living for the vast majority of people, relative to what’s seen in the communist/fascist or tribal worlds.  But you see, this is what the Democrats cannot tolerate, because those who are successful and enjoy a reasonable standard of living have no need of those social services that only the government can provide.  And therefore they tend not to vote for Democrats.  So therefore Democrats must devise a way that prevents individuals from achieving any level of success that permits them to escape dependence upon the government.  Hence the rationale for pushing socialism.

The one way to expose these nuts, is to allow them to talk. Don't shut them up, let them go on, exposing themselves for what they are. It may well be part of God's plan to provoke them into a self-committal.  President Trump operates on so many levels, it's amazing to watch.  President Trump may have some considerable faults, but these Democrats have fundamental goals.  And if achieved, those goals will ensure that we become a people incapable of electing our own leaders.  This next election isn’t going to be about President Trump. Sure, he’ll be on the ballot, but this next election is really going to about us. These Democrats aren’t trying to defeat President Trump. They’re trying to defeat those of us who love freedom.

And finally, no matter how many times the Democrats attempt to sell the old canard of “no, no, socialism is really a good thing... we won't have barbed wire and gulags and lines for toilet paper... we'll do it right”, will never fly in this country, at least to the extent necessary.  It is a fact that everywhere Socialism has ever been tried it has been an abject failure with the only result having been poverty on what has been nothing less than a massive scale. It is a system based on system of governance which inevitably results in an elite cadre of unaccountable bureaucrats running every aspect of the economy and hence people's lives. This ALWAYS fails and results in only misery, poverty and mass murder. The majority of Americans don't want it.

A NEW TALE OF TWO AMERICAS???

Once upon a time we were told, by a Democrat then running for president, a tail of “two Americas” in which the teller of the story was referring to social stratification in American society.  The year was 2004 and the candidate was John Edwards who in telling his story was referencing America’s haves and have-nots.  But more recently, this tail of two Americas has been revised so as to be more about the direction this country should now be headed.  Because there is now a growing number of politicians advocating for America to abandon completely that which allowed her to become the most prosperous, and the freest, nation in all of human history, and accept Socialism. 

And it’s after Tuesday night’s State of the Union address, and the Democrat reaction to it, that alarm bells should now be going off in the head of every freedom loving American.  In a way, the entire experience, besides being a little bizarre, was more than a little revealing.  Now for the record I did watch both the president and the so-called response from Ms. Abrams.  And the one striking thing that I noticed was how, unlike past years, this year the address and the corresponding response was less about the differing views of where we should go as a country than it was about making clear   the divide that now seems to exist between the opinions of WHO we are as a country.

First, of course, we had President Trump.  He delivered a speech which was peppered with the various types of policy proposals that we have come to expect from a State of the Union Address.  What was different about this speech was that it was also full of celebrations of America and Americans.  In a sense it was a rallying cry for American exceptionalism.  And what was more than a little bizarre was how the Democrats chose to react to it.  I mean, you’d expect them to disagree with and/or disapprove of certain policy proposals but most Democrats refused even to applaud the idea of a government-led push to eradicate AIDS in 10 years.  Which was strange.

And when the president talked about ending human trafficking and the smuggling of narcotics by drug cartels, Democrats again didn’t seem to be the least bit interested.  So, are we now to assume that for some strange reason they actually support human and drug smuggling?  What else are we to think if they seem to oppose measures to fight them?  And on the issue of improving health care for our Veterans, Democrats again sat on their hands.  On the concept of freedom and the United States never becoming a socialist country, it was again silence from the left. Democrats didn’t even applaud a booming economy and record low black and Hispanic unemployment.

But the different visions of what our country is didn’t end with the president’s speech. Nope, not by a long shot, because it was with the official “Democrat Response” that the night became even stranger.  Stacey Abrams, yet to admit defeat in the 2018 race for Georgia governor, delivered an official response that amounted to little more than a personal list of reasons for why she thinks she lost her election.   She seems to be following the Hitlery model of blaming everyone, and everything, but herself for the fact that she lost.  It would seem that the ONLY way Democrats can lose elections today is because of racism, misogyny or because someone cheated.

This ‘response’ seemed unlike any other I have ever bothered sticking around to listen to.  Abrams started off with a story about her father who allegedly gave his jacket to a homeless man.  And it was from there that she launched into an endorsement of collectivism.  And apparently the moral of her bizarre story was, “We do not succeed alone.”  Now if the story about her father is true, it was an action that he took on his own, an act of individual charity, which is almost uniquely American.  Democrats, however, want to use the power of government to force people into giving their jackets to others. That isn’t charity, nor is it freedom, that, my friends, is tyranny.

And again it was in Ms. Abrams seeming to make things up as she went along that she went on to declare, “Under the current administration, far too many hard-working Americans are falling behind, living paycheck to paycheck, most without labor unions to protect them from even worse harm.  The Republican tax bill rigged the system against working people. Rather than bringing back jobs, plants are closing, layoffs are looming and wages struggle to keep pace with the actual cost of living.”  What we have here is an example of propaganda in its purest form.  She knew what she was saying had no resemblance to the truth, but she said it anyway, she had to.

People living paycheck to paycheck aren’t living beyond their means, they’re victims. Those not in unions haven’t chosen not to join one, they’re being denied it somehow. There are more jobs than people looking for work, but no one can find a job and the economy is in mid-collapse.   There is today in America, an entire industry made up of politicians, all manner of celebrities and the wealthy, on the left working non-stop in an effort to convince people that no matter how good things appear, they’re really awful. In fact they’re worse than awful.  And the ‘fake news’ media is right there to drive the point home, by backing up all of the false claims with all manner of lies.

And while they will deny it, the dirty little secret is that the Democrats can survive only by convincing people that they’re victims, that they will be unable to get ahead without their help, without government. They seek to enslave people by creating a dependency on government ‘benefits’, it’s the key to their success.  And such was the point that Ms. Abrams was trying so hard to drive home during her silly attempt at responding to President Trump’s address on Tuesday night.  I’d like to think that most folks were able to recognize it for what it was, an attempt to make folks see things not as they really are, but instead how it is that the Democrats wish them to be. 

And finally, if Democrats are actually right, and things are so bad here in America, then why is it that there are thousands of migrants lining up at our southern border wanting to come here?  Why don't they head south to Costa Rica or to Panama, both reasonably well-developed nations with good economies, low cost of living and plenty of job opportunities?  And why aren’t we seeing thousands of Americans fleeing this racist, sexist, misogynistic country where those awful capitalists want nothing more than to exploit you and keep you down?  The answer is a relatively simply one, there is still no country anywhere that provides one the same opportunities as America.

THE DEMOCRAT NON-RESPONSE RESPONSE TO THE PRESIDENT’S STATE OF THE UNION…

Those who happened to be tuned into Fox News last night for President Trump’s third State of the Union address would have heard, Chris Wallace, one of the many leftwing NeverTrumpers who have come to reside there at Fox, thoroughly poo-poo the president’s address before then turning right around and heaping all manner of praise on what was described as being the Democrat Party’s official ‘response’ given by, she who like Hitlery refuses to admit defeat, Stacey Abrams, who had obviously been cleaned up more than just a bit before her appearance on national television.

Despite Wallace’s rather glowing critique, Ms. Abrams droned on for I’m not sure how long doing little more than to magically transport those watching back in time, back to the 1960s, as the picture she painted of America bore very little resemblance to America as it actually exists here in 2019.  And it was in fairly short order that it became rather apparent that she was much less interested in simply responding to the president’s address than she was in creating some sort of alternate universe as she claimed the president’s policies were actually damaging the American economy. 

And it was in speaking before an audience made up almost exclusively of women that Abrams didn’t stray too far from the talking points that she had likely been provided with by Chuckie Schumer.  As evidenced by when she said, “The Republican tax bill rigged the system against working people. Rather than bringing back jobs, plants are closing, layoffs are looming, and wages struggle to keep pace with the actual cost of living.”  Now anyone watching, and who has been paying the least bit of attention over the last couple of years, had to be scratching their head at that one.

It was in listening to Abrams, which was something I actually had to force myself to do, that she seemed, at least to me, to have lost her grip on reality.  The Trump tax cuts offered relief to middle-class families.  More than that, they helped the economy soar to 3 percent annual growth, creating 304,000 new jobs last month alone, and boosting wages for blue-collar workers.  In fact, blue-collar wages are now rising faster than wages for white-collar workers, as has reported by any number of reliable news outlets.  And overall wage growth is at its best pace in over a decade.

Yes, there have been the occasional plant closures but they have been overwhelmed by the number of new job openings.  Currently, there are more jobs available in the U.S. than there are unemployed people to fill them. Manufacturing, in particular, has soared, the U.S. economy has defied the low expectations of the Barry ‘O’ era to add the most manufacturing jobs in more than 20 years.  Remember how Barry once declared it would take some sort of “magic wand” to bring manufacturing jobs back to America?  It was a magic wand in the form of lower taxes and fewer regulations.  

And I thought it rather odd when Ms. Abrams actually said, “Democrats stand ready to effectively secure our ports and borders.”  That too didn’t exactly jive with the way things truly exist, because the border plan House Democrats offered to the president this month was one that demands that all immigration enforcement end, by the end of Fiscal Year 2019, for any adult crossing the border with a child. Rather than being held in detention, those adults and the migrant children they trafficked across the border would be released immediately into the interior of the country.

Also, the House Democrat offer does not include ANY money to construct a wall, much less a barrier, at our southern border, but it does provide about $502 million for “humanitarian concerns”, funding that illegal aliens and border crossers would have access to in the form of food, transportation, medical care, and housing.  So I’m not exactly sure how it is that Ms. Abrams interprets that as the Democrats standing ready to “effectively secure our ports and borders.”  And it’s by making such a patently untrue statement that she reveals herself as being nothing but a hack politician.

Another talking point presented by Abrams concerned the recent partial government shutdown.  Abrams said, “The shutdown was a stunt engineered by the president of the United States, one that defied every tenet of fairness and abandoned not just our people—but our values.”  But again truth becomes much stranger than fiction.  Because you see, the Senate passed a spending measure to fund the government through February without the border wall funding the president had demanded.  But the House, still under Republican control, passed a bill with wall funding.

The shutdown began December 22, and during one of the negotiating meetings at the White House, on January 9, the president said he would reopen the government immediately if Democrats agreed to funding a border wall. Pelosi said no, and the president left the meeting.  Ten days later the president offered to extend the Obama-era Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program in exchange for a wall. Pelosi again said no.  On January 25, the president agreed to sign a bill funding the government for three more weeks until a border security deal can be reached.

And of course Abrams brought up what has long been another old favorite of Democrats, that being the supposed issue of ‘voter suppression.’  Abrams said she accepts her 2018 loss in the Georgia governor’s race, but “cannot accept efforts to undermine our right to vote.”  Abrams said, “Let’s be clear, voter suppression is real.”  And in spewing what is nothing more than the party line, she said, “From making it harder to register and stay on the rolls to moving and closing polling places to rejecting lawful ballots, we can no longer ignore these threats to democracy.”  

But it’s a funny thing, because according to Hans von Spakovsky, manager of the Election Law Reform Initiative at The Heritage Foundation, it was during the eight year reign of Barry ‘O’ that the Justice Department brought just ‘5’ cases related to race-based voter suppression under Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act.  And it was he who pointed out that what Democrats often mean when they start throwing around claims of “voter suppression” is a reference to voter ID laws which require persons to produce photo identification before they are allowed to vote at their polling place.

And it was also von Spakovsky who pointed out another interesting fact, that those like Abrams might have a bit of a hard time trying to explain away.  You see, in an op-ed that he did for National Review, he explained how it was that “nine of the 11 states that have implemented so-called strict ID Laws either saw an increase in turnout or exceeded the national average in turnout in 2016.”  So how is it that this genius, Abrams, can explain that little phenomenon, I wonder?   Chances are it’s facts such as those that the Democrats will simply choose to treat as if they don’t exist. 

Sadly, it’s women like Abrams, and Hitlery, who give women a bad name. They claim to be strong, intelligent women yet they whine and complain at every turn. They seem unable to lose with grace and dignity, choosing to attack the winner instead of looking for why they lost.  They pull the sexist card, the race card or claim that they were somehow cheated out of their rightful victory. They make women look weak and fragile and unable to deal with reality. They are not role models. Truly strong women are capable of learning from their losses, dust themselves off and just move on.

In Abrams we have another Obama disciple who tells emotional stories, but delivers no substance, facts, or solutions to Americans. She’s a very dangerous person because she actually believes what she’s saying, which is spoon fed from her party of lawless, infant killing, anti-American sociopaths that want nothing more than to see America in decline so they can keep their ‘modern’ form of slavery alive, keeping American families dependent on bigger and bigger government. America is not the nation of leeches, America has done more for the human race than any other nation in history.

The President has accomplished remarkable things for our country and for our people, ALL of our people. The Democrats, as made clear by Abrams response, can only criticize while their constituents benefit from the president’s many accomplishments.  All we have here out of the mouth of the Democrats are promises of all manner of ‘free’ stuff.  The sad part of it is that the Democrats know ‘free’ (Socialism) doesn't work but they feel if they can get enough people to vote for their ‘free’ agenda, they will be in power forever.  We the American people must be smarter than that!

DEMOCRAT PARTY SLOGAN FOR 2020, “THE ONLY ‘GOOD’ BABY, IS A ‘DEAD’ BABY…

Ok, so let’s just say that you are a responsible member of Congress.  And a bill has been introduced to your body (it really doesn’t matter whether it’s the House or the Senate and neither should it matter, for the purposes of this bill, what party you are a member of) the purpose of which is to require babies born alive during an abortion be provided with reasonable medical care and transport to a hospital.  Would you, as a responsible member of Congress, choose to support such a bill? Now I know to most that sounds like a real no-brainer, but if very recent behavior by Democrats is any indication it’s apparently it’s not the no-brainer that most normal people see it as. 

Because it was just such a scenario that recently took place in the U.S. Senate when just such a bill was introduced, and what do you think happened.  Exactly what you’d think would happen, because what took place is that we had Senate Democrats, led by Democrat Patty Murray, block it.  And for those who may be unfamiliar, Nebraska Republican Ben Sasse introduced the Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act (S. 130) to protect babies who have survived failed abortions.  Sasse went to the floor of the Senate Monday to ask his colleagues to pass the bill by unanimous consent, but that Democrats, as I’m sure Sen. Sasse knew they would, unanimously objected.

Referencing the recent firestorm created by the Virginia bill known rather nondescriptly, as the Repeal Act, introduced by Democrat Delegate Kathy Tran and supported by Democrat Gov. Ralph Northam, Sasse said, “This place fancies itself the world’s greatest deliberative body, but we would be deceiving ourselves if we ignored the biggest debate that’s been happening in America over the last 36 hours. A public elected official — the Governor of one of the 50 states — has been defending a practice that is morally repugnant. The Governor of Virginia has been defending a practice that is repugnant to civilized people across the entire world.”

The Born-Alive Act states that Congress acknowledges an “infant” born alive during a failed abortion “is a legal person for all purposes under the laws of the United States, and entitled to all the protections of such laws.” The bill also states, “Any infant born alive after an abortion or within a hospital, clinic, or other facility has the same claim to the protection of the law that would arise for any newborn, or for any person who comes to a hospital, clinic, or other facility for screening and treatment or otherwise becomes a patient within its care.”  I don’t know about anyone else, but that all sounds pretty reasonable to me and in no way does it sound the least bit extreme.

Under this piece of legislation, health care providers who fail to provide medical care to an infant born alive after abortion can be fined or imprisoned for up to five years, or both. And also according to the Born-Alive Act, the intentional killing of an infant born alive after abortion “shall be punished as … intentionally killing or attempting to kill a human being.”  How is it that after committing murder against anyone other than the most defenseless among us, you at least go to prison?  Why should anyone who commits such a heinous act be permitted to go scot-free?  And so, it would seem that the new mantra of the Democrat Party is: ‘The only GOOD baby, is a DEAD baby.’ 

And an act that was just as barbaric and which came just prior to the controversy over the Virginia bill, which would allow abortion even moments before birth, it was in New York that 2020 Democrat presidential hopeful, Andy Cuomo, signed a bill into law that denies “personhood” to unborn babies.  Under Cuomo’s law, violence against an unborn child during a homicide is no longer criminally punishable.  So there now seems to a rather disturbing trend that’s now spreading, much like some vile plague as Democrats in Rhode Island and Vermont have also proposed bills that would strip most restrictions on abortion and declare the procedure a “fundamental right.” 

Keep in mind that all of this going on at that same time that we had a recent Marist poll which found 75 percent of Americans want substantial restrictions on abortion, including 60 percent of Democrats and 61 percent of those who identify as “pro-choice.”  So I’m a little confused when it comes to how it might be that Democrats like ‘Little Patty’ Murray can claim what they’re really doing here is in the name of creating a substantial restriction on abortions.  Is it me? Am I missing something here?  I know I’m nowhere near as sophisticated as ‘Little Patty,’ but to the casual observer what the Democrats are advocating here is nothing short of disgustingly grotesque.

What kind of an evil monster would you have to be to take some instrument to a crying baby, one just delivered or who had survived a botched late-term abortion, and use that instrument to snuff out the life of that helpless infant?  And who is it that could use an instrument to crush the skull of a viable fetus who could survive a premature birth? Apparently, Democrats have no moral dilemma in such an act of murder. Incredible!  And how is it that ANY self-respecting physician would allow himself, or herself, to be used by a political party as its weapon of choice against a defenseless baby at the most vulnerable time in its very young life? Disgusting!

But I am curious about something. Remember how it was just a few months back when we had the rather unfortunate situation of having two children die while in the custody of our Border Patrol and how quick Democrats, especially those vying to take on the president in 2020, were in their effort to essentially weaponize the death of those children.  What is it that made the lives of those children any more valuable than the millions of those that Democrats seem so eager to kill? Democrats always tell us how it’s about the children, but which children?  Only those fortunate enough to escape the abortionist?   But sadly, now even those haven’t made it home free. 

So this would appear to be where we are now, as a country, and who is it that could have seen that coming?  Certainly not me!  And while 60 percent of Democrats can ‘claim’ to want “substantial restrictions on abortion”, certainly there is someone who is voting for Democrats like Murray, Cuomo and that moron, Northam, in Virginia.  After all, there is still a requirement for obtaining higher office, having won an election.  Hell, it’s only 25 percent of Virginia Democrats who disapprove of Northam.   So you see it’s not only the Democrat politicians who have blood on their hands, it’s anyone who is willing to either support, or worse to vote for, ANY Democrat!

HOWARD DEAN AND THE MORAL DEGENERATES WHO COMPRISE TODAY’S DEMOCRAT PARTY…

Can someone please help me to understand how it is that creepy Democrats feel that it is they who are somehow morally superior? I mean here we have an entire political party that has absolutely no problem with the butchering of babies, apparently right up to the time of delivery, and even after, as well as the selling of their body parts, that condones, and even encourages, the killing of police officers, and is excepting of the grotesque behavior being committed by those in this country illegally, and yet still they have the audacity to accuse Republicans of being the ones who have no morals.

It was Sunday at ‘fake news’ headquarters (CNN) on “Reliable Sources,” that Howard Dean, Democrat, said Republicans “have no morals at all.”  Discussing the controversy over Ralph Northam’s yearbook page, Dean said, “I don’t know Ralph Northam. I believe he’s a decent person, but I think he has to resign. He just can’t be effective as a governor after something like this.”  He said, “The ground is shifting underneath people’s feet. People are not going to put up with this stuff anymore. Maybe they would have put up with it in the past, but they’re not going to put up with it now.”

CNN host Brian Stelter asked, “Do you see a double standard at play?” referencing, “President Trump’s own racist history.”  Dean said, “Oh sure, there is among the Republicans. They have no morals at all. I mean, Republicans are happy to ask Ralph Northam to resign. They have a much worse guy who is heading their party. It’s ridiculous.”  Again, as it always does with these unhinged leftwing nutjobs, it comes back to President Trump.  It’s like they have nothing else.  All of us who voted for President Trump are nothing more than a bunch of racists.  It’s just plain ludicrous.

What's amazing about people like Dean is that they keep crawling out of their sewer trying to outdo each other with increasingly radical claims. There is no leadership anymore in this odd assortment of freaks and perverts, and I have no doubt that their ‘Trump Derangement Syndrome’ will eventually cause them to simply implode. They will come to be exposed if we continue to fight back.  No morals?  By what standard? The guy who’s ok with “killing” a child ‘after’ birth or the fact that on his “personal” year book page there’s a guy in black face smiling alongside a guy in a KKK outfit?

All of this is pretty rich coming from a member of the party that cheers on the murder of viable children, boos God at their convention and sides with every loathsome and barbaric revolutionary on the planet.  This is the party that hates America, free speech, our military and Vets, law enforcement, firearms, petroleum, Christians, small government, the Electoral College, legal immigration and voter ID. They love and champion everything that is detrimental to American's interest.  Dean is just another on what has now become what is a very long list of mentally ill Democrats.

And how is it that this CNN boob, Brian Stelter, feels justified in accusing President Trump of having a racist history.  It was Trump who just a few years back was being cheered by the likes of both Sharpton and Jackson.  And I‘ve not found anything to do with race in his attempts to improve our country, just the opposite is true. After all, minority unemployment is now the lowest that it has been in decades!  Yet Dean and the Democrats continue to put forward the claim that it is they who are somehow the protectors of minorities when it their policies that continue to hold minorities down.

And if I now have this right, the ONLY ones to possess morals are the very same ones who have supported 55 million abortions, those who support open borders, or the taking away from law abiding citizens their right to own firearms, or wish to provide free education for all and illegals, free health care for all and illegals (at a cost of $32 Trillion) who supports a guaranteed income, who supports a 90% income tax, who supports the stupid green energy policy and who supports sanctuary cities and states. Meanwhile it’s Republicans who oppose these things who are said to have no morals. 

So once again we have the same ignorant drivel coming from yet another mentally deranged and Godless Democrat who hates America.  Democrats, including this moral degenerate, Howard Dean, are nothing more than domestic terrorists, they are the true enemies of our great nation and little more than Satan's lapdogs.  These people form the most twisted, sick and perverted political party ever to exist on our planet. Democrats always try to hide their perversions by blaming others, but they can hide them no longer. Their hate and love of tyranny shine through for all to see today.

So, we’re supposed to believe that President Trump has a history of racism.  Yet, all that’s been put forward as being supposed proof of this claim has been all manner of unsubstantiated rumor and disgusting innuendo.  And apparently because I support him in wanting a wall and to have illegal immigrants deported I too have been labeled as being a racist.  Why is it considered as being racist to want those coming into our country to do so in a legal manner, and to do so according to our laws?  What do they think gives them the right to come to this country simply because they want to? 

Progressives like Dean continue to push an increasingly radical plot against our president that remains totally devoid of facts. Meanwhile they have numerous, and undeniable, perpetrators of racism and bigotry within their own ranks and yet they simply choose to ignore them, denying even that they exist.  And it is from their many allies in the ‘fake news’ media that get all manner of assistance in that endeavor.  It’s the Democrat Party that remains racism’s safest place in this country, and it will remain that way until enough Democrats abandon their party for something better.

And it is everything that Democrats accuse President Trump of being that they themselves are and on a much grander, and far worse scale.  President Trump may be some things but what he most definitely is not is a racist. And the very last people who should be lecturing anyone regarding the definition of morality, or racism, is about anyone who calls himself a Democrat.  And the longer they accuse him of being what it is that he so very clearly he is not, the more they reveal their true selves and just how dangerous they have become to freedom in this country.  They are evil.

HAIL SPARTACUS FOR PRESIDENT!!!

So, in their search to find a worthy candidate have the Democrats now found their man? (Or am I no longer allowed to ask that question?)  Cory Booker, Democrat from New Jersey, officially announced his candidacy for President of the United States on Friday, joining what is expected to be a rather crowded Democrat primary field. So the ‘man’ who fancies himself as being the next Barack Hussein Obama now thinks he’s ready for prime time.  Personally, not being a Democrat myself, I’m thinking that if Booker truly is the best the Democrats will be able to come up with, they’re worse off than even I thought.  He’s little more than a cartoon character.

But having said that, in declaring himself a candidate Booker tweeted out to his dozen or so followers, ““I believe that we can build a country where no one is forgotten, no one is left behind; where parents can put food on the table; where there are good-paying jobs with good benefits in every neighborhood; where our criminal justice system keeps us safe, instead of shuffling more children into cages and coffins; where we see the faces of our leaders on television and feel pride, not shame.”  He said, “It is not a matter of can we, it’s a matter of do we have the collective will, the American will?” And he added, “I believe we do.”  The American will?

Further, in his announcement video, Booker invoked the fight against slavery, while touting the importance of immigration.  He said, “The history of our nation is defined by collective action; by interwoven destinies of slaves and abolitionists; of those born here and those who chose America as home; of those who took up arms to defend our country and those who linked arms to challenge and change it.”  And it came as no surprise that Booker made no mention of the fact that it was his Democrat Party that was the party responsible for slavery and who stood in stubborn opposition against those who sought to abolish the blatantly barbaric practice of men ‘owning’ men.  

So, as we approach 2020 it would appear that we now have liberal men wishing they were women, liberal women wishing they were men, Booker thinking he is Spartacus, Elizabeth Warren thinking she's an Indian and Barack Obama still claiming to be an American.  Oh, and then there’s ‘Creepy Joe’ Biden who’s really Homer Simpson, ‘Slick Willy’ Clinton who was really the first black president and Hitlery who thinks she is President.  Am I the only to see a bit of a pattern developing here?  Come on folks, we have got to be able to do better than what the Democrat Party has thus far presented to us as being those they feel are the most qualified to be president. 

And don’t be fooled into believing that any of these Democrats are anything other than what they’ve always been and that the Democrat Party platform is about anything other than hate:  Hate of President Trump, Hate of white people, Hate of working people, Hate of babies, Hate of law and order, Hate of morality, hate, hate and even more hate.  And too, make no mistake, voting Democrat will only result in nothing more than: the murder of more babies, higher taxes, more welfare, free college, more debt, more regulations, gun confiscation, open borders, and trans kids rights!  So they're definitely headed in the right direction, right?

And one thing is for sure, most of those now running under the Democrat Party banner have, what are for Democrats, some pretty solid resumes. After all, it’s Booker who has had sexual harassment charges filed against him, Kamala Harris has been outed for sleeping with an old married man in order to garner for herself a $72,000 a year state job and Elizabeth Warren lied about her ethnicity in order to gain employment.  And yet, these ‘swamp’ creatures feel quite comfortable, even justified, in accusing President Trump of being responsible for all manner of dastardly deed, of being a white supremacist, a racist and, of course that old standby, a Nazi.  

I can't wait for the Democrat primary debates and the ‘promises’ piling up.  Everything from free cellphones, free education, free healthcare, free citizenship, free retirement, free, free, free!  Except for the poor shmucks who are stupid enough to keep working and who will end paying for all this free stuff courtesy of higher taxes.  And notice that Booker is promising what President Trump has already delivered?  But there’s one big difference.  Booker wants the government to own and run businesses and healthcare while President Trump has proven capitalism can work the way it’s suppose to if big brother keeps his nose out of everyone’s business.

And it remains rather difficult for me to believe that what’s now being touted as the priorities of today’s Democrat Party are also the priorities for the requisite number of voters that would actually be required to provide any Democrat candidate for president with a viable path to victory.  Are there really enough voters who support such things as open borders, abortion up to, and in some cases after, the time of delivery, men being allowed to use women’s restrooms and the bogus theory of manmade ‘climate change?’  Do such things really trump the desire for a ‘booming economy’, low unemployment, increased border security and lower taxes?