THE DIFFERING CHRISTMAS MESSAGES FROM THE MIDDLE EAST....

FROM ISRAEL

 

 

FROM THE PALESTINIANS



HERE'S WISHING YOU ALL A VERY MERRY CHRISTMAS!!

I would like to take this opportunity to wish all of those who may stop by here, from time to time, and who perhaps choose to take part in the conversation, a very Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year. And as our New Year’s resolution let us all say a little prayer for our country, because I think she’s going to be needing it if we are to have any hope of surviving the next four years. Sadly, many have lost faith in those things that made this country great, and they have allowed themselves to be convinced by corrupt, power hungry, politicians to be envious of others, and to blame others for their own misfortunes that were brought about by their own recklessness or bad decisions. We as a people must move back, back to where we view such traits as personal responsibility and self-reliance not as being flaws that reveal weakness, but, instead, as ingredients necessary if one is to possess a strong moral character. Because if we are to have any hope of saving ourselves and our country from that which appears to be near certain, and very dark, end, we will first need to learn the value and the importance of such things. So in the spirit of the season let me just say, may God bless you all, and may God bless America.

RIGHT, NOW THERE'S A COMMONSENSE SOLUTION...START PROFILING WHITE GUYS...

Is this not some of the most idiotic drivel you've ever heard? Our state-controlled media continues to prove itself, every single day, that it deserves, just a little less, to be taken seriously. Those whom we are supposed to be able to trust and to rely upon as being accurate providers of news and information have demonstrated time and again that that, apparently is somthing that they are no longer interested in. Instead, they see themselves as being social advocates of one type or another and as being nothing more than a wholly owned subsidiary of the Democrat Party.

IN SPITE OF WHAT THE DEMOCRATS AND THE MEDIA WOULD HAVE YOU THINK, GUNS ARE NOT THE LEADING CAUSE OF DEATH IN AMERICA…

Once again Democrats, backed up by their many minions in the state-controlled media, are very busy at work trying to seize upon the emotion of a tragedy. They are once again desperately trying to justify their claims that if we could only increase gun control laws, literally 10’s of thousands of lives would be saved every single year. But what this is, is nothing more than another effort of theirs to further a sinister political agenda that, if we allow it to continue, will further reduce the level of freedom that each one of us enjoy here in these United States. We Americans are a very shortsighted bunch, as we have this tendency of losing sight of what is the big picture. And sleazy Democrats, as well as many of those in our state-controlled media, are only too happy to attempt to use that affliction, as they try to manipulate us into going along with their drive to curb yet another of what are our Constitutional ‘rights.’

Just imagine for a minute how it is that 90,000 Americans die in a hospital every single year. Or one American dies in a hospital from a medical error or a lethal infection every 6 minutes. Apparently, Americans are much safer at home where 54,500 Americans die every year, or one American is killed in an accident at home every 10 minutes. And things are nearly as bad on our highways where 46,844 are killed every year, or one American killed by a traffic accident every 11 minutes. And believe it or not, 40,059 die every year from poisoning, or one American accidentally poisoned to death every 13 minutes. Falls kill 22,631 Americans every year, or one American killed in a fall every 23 minutes. Drunk driving kills 10,288 Americans every year with 28 Americans getting killed every day, while drowning kills 3,443 Americans a year, or 9 Americans every day. Homicide 18,361 One American murdered every 29 minutes.

Back 2009, which were the most recent statistics that I could find regarding the total number of deaths caused by various diseases, the total number of deaths in the United States stood at 2,437,163. At that time there were 793.8 deaths per 100,000 population, life expectancy was 78.5 years and the infant Mortality rate: 6.39 deaths per 1,000 live births. At that time the number of deaths and the leading causes were: 1) Heart disease: 599,413, 2) Cancer: 567,628, 3) Chronic lower respiratory diseases: 137,353, 4) Stroke (cerebrovascular diseases): 128,842, 4) Accidents (unintentional injuries): 118,021, 5) Alzheimer's disease: 79,003, 6) Diabetes: 68,705, 7) Influenza and Pneumonia: 53,692, 8) Nephritis, nephrotic syndrome, and nephrosis: 48,935, and 9) Intentional self-harm (suicide): 36,909.

Now granted, any death that could somehow have been prevented is always a tragedy. But having said that, don’t you think it just a bit unseemly for politicians to so obviously seek ways to exploit that tragedy for no other reason than to further their specific political agenda? Over the years we have time and again seen how Democrats can be quite skilled in their attempts to create Constitutional rights where none exist, while that the same time working feverishly to squelch those rights that are made quite clear in the words as they are written. And what we are now witnessing, once again, is yet another attempt by Democrats, and a very liberal media acting as their willing accomplices, to use another tragedy as a way to circumvent that which the Constitution says is one of our rights as Americans. And isn’t it sad that they mourn not for the children who lost their lives, but seek to use their needless deaths as a political tool?

AN ARROGANT DAVID GREGORY MADE TO LOOK PRETTY STUPID BY LAPIERRE....

SO, JUST HOW BIG OF AN ASSHOLE IS OBAMA?

Apparently, I’d say, he’s a pretty big one. You see, a Wall Street Journal report detailing the broken-down status of talks between, he who has been described as being our "Lord and Savior," Barack Obama and House Speaker John Boehner on the year-end "fiscal cliff" reveals that Barry threatened to use both his inaugural and State of the Union speeches to do nothing more than to blame Republicans if there’s no deal. But his having made such a threat should really come as no surprise to anyone. After all, to Barry, this is how politics is supposed to work. Look at the disgustingly sleazy smear campaign he used against Romney based on what was an endless series of, what were nothing but Axelrod created, lies. Combined with voter fraud on a massive scale, and Barry was able to win, again.

Negotiations reportedly came to a standstill after Boehner proposed increasing the tax rate on top earners: "Mr. Obama repeatedly lost patience with the speaker as negotiations faltered. In an Oval Office meeting last week, he told Mr. Boehner that if the sides didn’t reach agreement, he would use his inaugural address and his State of the Union speech to tell the country the Republicans were at fault. At one point, according to notes taken by a participant, Mr. Boehner told the president, "I put $800 billion [in tax revenue] on the table. What do I get for that?" "You get nothing," the president said. "I get that for free.""

And according to Politico, Barry was referring to Rep. Tom Cole (R-Okla.) and Senate Republicans who had already said they would be open to tax rate increases and therefore he didn’t need to concede anything. Barry has been buoyed by his election victory, using it as an opportunity to remind Boehner he has the upper hand: "Mr. Obama insisted on raising tax rates for those with household income above $250,000. The House GOP wanted significant spending cuts and fundamental changes to Medicare and other entitlement programs in exchange for new tax revenue. The president repeatedly reminded Mr. Boehner of the election results: "You’re asking me to accept Mitt Romney’s tax plan. Why would I do that?""

Barry and family have since headed off to Hawaii for their $4 Million Christmas vacation for which we the taxpayers are supposed to gladly cover the cost. But before departing on Friday, he said he was still confident the two sides could reach a "comprehensive deal" after using the holidays as, what he called, a cooling-off period. Boehner used the weekly Republican address to say the House had done all it could to avert the cliff and that it was now down to Barry to come up with a "balanced" approach. But in order for him to do that, Barry would first need to possess an interest in doing so. And he doesn’t, it’s just that simple. Nothing will make him happier that to successfully steer us right over the cliff. After all, he has, repeatedly, made that quite clear.

OBAMA, TAKING NARCISSISM TO A WHOLE NEW LEVEL…

 

 

If there is one thing that we have come to recognize about Barry "Almighty," it’s the fact that he’s never been the least bit shy about blowing his own horn. Barry recent took advantage of yet another impromptu occasion, this one the funeral for Hawaii senator Daniel Inouye, to talk about pretty much nothing but, himself. In a short, for Barry, 1,600 word speech, he used the word "my" 21 times, "me" 12 times, and "I" 30 times. Personally, I was never a very big fan of Inouye, to me he was just another liberal who saw more wrong with America than all that was right. And as such, I suppose there will be many who will miss him, but I most certainly will not. It’s because of politicians like him that our country is now struggling. But still, that doesn’t alter the fact that Barry wasn’t there to talk about himself.

 

 

Barry's speech discussed how it was that Inouye had first gotten him interested in politics. "Danny was elected to the U.S. Senate when I was two years old," Barry said. Speaking to the audience at the National Cathedral in Washington, D.C., Barry talked at length about his family and their vacations. "Now, even though my mother and grandparents took great pride that they had voted for him, I confess that I wasn't paying much attention to the United States Senate at the age of four or five or six. It wasn't until I was 11 years old that I recall even learning what a U.S. senator was, or it registering, at least. It was during my summer vacation with my family -- my first trip to what those of us in Hawaii call the Mainland," Barry said. So on and on it went, no doubt causing many to wonder why they were there.

 

 

Barry did take at least a few moments to mention what many describe as being the heroic life of Inouye. "And so we remember a man who inspired all of us with his courage, and moved us with his compassion, that inspired us with his integrity, and who taught so many of us -- including a young kid growing up in Hawaii –-- that America has a place for everyone," Barry concluded. Look, for all of those out there who seem to think Barry is such a prince of a guy, don’t you see it as being just a little unseemly to capitalize on a ceremony meant to honor an individual who has passed on, to do nothing more than to talk about yourself? I mean, how arrogant can one person be, to see it as being anywhere near appropriate to take every opportunity in front of nearly any crowd to talk about how great you think you are?



JUST IN CASE YOU THOUGHT OUR FOREIGN POLICY WOULD IMPROVE...

So it now becomes official, we move beyond the inept Hillary Clinton, to the incompetent boob, John Kerry-Heinz.  American foreign policy will continue in the manner where it will no doubt prove, even more so, to be the type of operation that would make Curly, Larry and Moe very proud. 

AN APOPLECTIC 'LOW-RENTS' O'DONNELL GOES OFF ON THE NRA...

JERROLD ‘PUMPKIN HEAD’ ADLER’S IN FAVOR OF THE GOVERNMENT TAKING YOUR GUN…

Rep. Jerrold ‘Pumpkin Head’ Nadler, New York Democrat, has now come out and said that only the federal government should have "high-capacity" gun magazines and that the "state ought to have a monopoly on legitimate violence." Huh? Now doesn’t that just give every freedom loving American a warm and fuzzy feelin? His idiotic proclamation came during a recent Capitol Hill press conference where this imbecilic Nadler, gathered with some of his fellow House Democrats, came to push for stricter gun control in the wake of last week’s shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Conn. These clowns, like Barry are now expending much energy in working to do nothing more than to exploit the death of 20 children.

Old ‘Pumpkin Head’ made the comment that he not only supports prohibiting the future sale of 10-round gun magazines, but he would like to see the government confiscate all high-capacity clips already ‘legally’ possessed by American citizens. It was after this little gathering of anti-gun politicians that Nadler was then asked if the shooting massacre at the Ft. Hood military base back in 2009 would have been prevented by the legislation that he now supports. On Nov. 5, 2009 Maj. Nidal Hasan, a radical Muslim nut, disguised as an Army psychiatrist, used an FN Five-Seven semi-automatic handgun, which can hold 11 to 31 rounds, to unload on the military base after reportedly shouting "Allahu Akbar," or "God is Great" in Arabic.

‘Pumpkin Head’ was asked. "Would banning high-capacity clips at Ft. Hood have prevented Maj. Nidal Hasan from killing 13 people and wounding 29 others?" This moron, Adler, responded saying, "I don’t know. It might have." It might have? He added. "Certainly, it was on a military base and he may or may not have had authority to use military weapons. I don’t know whether he did or not." He then said, "But the point of all this is not that we can prevent every single murder, [or] we can prevent every single even mass murder, but we can reduce it greatly." Adding "You know, no one would say we shouldn’t use penicillin because some people still die of infections, but a lot fewer do because we have penicillin and other wonder drugs." Huh?

Doing what Democrat do best, make up ‘facts’ as they go along, Nadler continued, "Now, the fact of the matter is that Germany has 150 or so people killed a year with guns; Canada, 170; the United States 9,000 to 10,000 a year. We have a murder rate with guns that are 15 to 20 times higher than any other industrialized country. There’s only one explanation and that’s the availability, the easy availability of assault weapons and of high-capacity clips." He said, "Now, last Friday we lost 20 children and six adults murdered in a Connecticut school." Adding, "Last Friday a madman attacked a school in China, an elementary school in China. Twenty-two kids were injured, but none killed because he had a knife, not an assault rifle. That’s the difference."

Then this buffoon was asked, "But if a bill was brought up and passed to ban high-capacity clips would the military still be allowed to use them?" Nadler answered, "Of course, the military would be allowed to use them." Nadler was then asked, "So only the government would be allowed to have high-capacity clips?" To which he responded, "Yes." He then went on to say, "Well, I think the legislation doesn’t ban existing ones but -- although I would like to do that, too." Adding, "But I think the legislation we’re talking about would prohibit the sale and probably manufacturer sale of high-capacity clips in the future, not those that are in private possession today." Nadler added, "But let me say, yes."

Adler then said, "One of the definitions of a nation state is that the state has a monopoly on legitimate violence. And the state ought to have a monopoly on legitimate violence." And added, "If the premise of your question is that people are going to resist a tyrannical government by shooting machine guns at American troops, that’s insane." Since Sandy Hook, Barry "Almighty" along with many of his fellow Democrats have been busily urging the need for action to be taken for stricter gun control. And we have heard Barry say that he will use "whatever power" his office holds to prevent mass shootings in the future. And at the prayer vigil for the Sandy Hook shooting on Sunday, Barry mentioned the shootings in Aurora, Co., Oak Creek, Wis., and Tuscon, Ariz., but strangely didn’t bother to mention the Ft. Hood massacre.

At Wednesday’s press conference, Nadler and Nancy ‘Too Much Botox’ Pelosi, in the company of several other Democrats, advocated for a bill introduced by Carolyn McCarthy and Diana DeGette, two other anti-gun Democrats, that would ban magazines for more than 10 rounds of ammunition. The bill would also prohibit the transfer, possession or importation of those magazines that are manufactured after the date of the law being signed. This idiot Nadler even went so far as to call the National Rifle Association (NRA) "enablers of mass murder." Let’s be honest here, the only enablers here are the very ones who are now very energetically working overtime to dream up ever newer and more inventive ways to rewrite our Constitution.

"We have a lobby, the leadership of the NRA, who function as enablers of mass murder," Nadler told Communist News Network (CNN) Host Piers Morgan. "And that's what they are. They're enablers of mass murder because they terrify the class of political people. And even though polling shows that most NRA members would support reasonable gun controls, every time someone proposes it, they come in." His rant continued, "They lie. They say they will take your guns away." Saying finally, "And they stop any kind of legislation to prevent that." As is most always the case when dealing with Democrats, nothing that is guy says has any basis in actual fact. He is so desperate he’ll say absolutely anything in an effort to ‘prove’ his point!

BILL AYERS EXPLAINS THE LEFT'S QUEST FOR OUR KIDS...

OBAMA SAYS HE’S A HOPELESS OPTIMIST…SURE HE IS…

Once again on Friday, our "Lord and Savior", Barack Obama reaffirmed the fact that he would not agree to any budget deal that doesn’t include higher taxes on the "wealthiest individuals." Republicans and Democrats, Barry said, can agree to a "balanced proposal that cuts spending, but also asks the wealthiest Americans to pay more." He rambled on, lying through his pearly white, saying, "During the course of these negotiations I offered to compromise with Republicans in Congress. I met them halfway on taxes, and I met them more than half way on spending, terms of actual dollar amounts, we’re not that far apart." Barry must have a rather odd way of defining ‘compromise’, because he’s done nothing more than to make it quite clear, throughout the entire ‘discussion’ thus far, that it’s going to have to be his way or no way. That’s just how Barry plays the game.

And then in telling us what most of us already know, Barry then proceeded to warn that if Congress fails to agree on a budget deal, the financial ramifications will be felt by everyone. "[E]ven though Democrats and Republicans are arguing about whether … rates should go up for the wealthiest individuals, all of us, every single one of us, agrees that tax rates shouldn’t go up for the other 98 percent of Americans, which includes 97 percent of small businesses," he said. Adding, "Every member of Congress believes that, every Democrat, every Republican. So there is absolutely no reason — none — not to protect these Americans from a tax hike." But here Barry lies to us yet again in his making the claim that 97 percent of all small businesses are included in those who $250,000 or less. That’s just not true, and Barry’s continuing to say it, as well as those in the media repeating it ad nauseam, isn’t gonna make it true!

"At the very least, let’s agree right now on what we already agree on. Let’s get that done."  Barry continued, urging Republicans and Democrats to come up with a plan they can both agree on. But in making such an idiotic statement, he ignores completely the fact that Senate Democrats aren’t willing to agree to anything. Barry went on to say, "Averting this middle class tax hike is not a Democratic or Republican responsibility. With their votes, the American people have determined that governing is a shared responsibility between both parties." He added, "In this Congress, laws can only pass with support from Democrats and Republicans. And that means nobody gets 100 percent of what they want. Everybody’s gotta give a little bit in a sensible way. We move forward together, or we do not move forward at all." But the fact is that it’s Barry who will be the one to decide on how it is that we move ‘forward.’

Because in his saying that nobody ever gets 100 percent of what they want, he most certainly can’t be referring to himself, because, after all, he fully expects to get everything he wants and then some. Barry went on to ask that members of both parties use their Christmas vacation to reflect on the problems facing the nation. "I hope it gives everybody some perspective. Everybody can cool off," he said. He recommended, "Everybody can drink some eggnog, have some Christmas cookies, sing — sing some Christmas carols, enjoy the company of loved ones." He then promptly jetted off to Hawaii on his $4 Million vacation and all at taxpayer expense, a fact that demonstrates more clearly that just about anything else, the fact that the looming fiscal cliff doesn’t bother him anymore than a cloudy day. Barry is nothing more than a political charlatan, one who feel he is completely justified in saying anything he must in getting what he wants.

Barry challenged Congress one last time to come up with a plan: "We’re going to have to find some common ground. And the challenge that we’ve got right now is that the American people are a lot more sensible and a lot more thoughtful, and much more willing to compromise and give and sacrifice and act responsibly than their elected representatives are. And that’s a problem. There’s a mismatch right now between how everybody else is thinking about these problems, Democrats and Republicans, outside of this town and how folks are operating here. And we’ve just got to get that aligned, and we’ve only got 10 days to do it. So I hope that every member of Congress is thinking about that. Nobody can get 100 percent of what they want. And this is not simply a contest between parties in terms of who looks good and who doesn’t." "So call me a hopeless optimist, but I actually still think we can get it done," Barry concluded.

Look, let’s not fool ourselves here, if there is one certainty in all of this talk about averting the big plunge over the ‘fiscal cliff’, it’s that Barry is perfectly content to go right on over the edge. In fact he wants us to go over the cliff because doing so gives to him nearly everything he wants, higher taxes and spending cuts. So all of this talk about being some sort of an optimist about some sort of deal being reached, is nothing more than another example of what has become Barry’s very typical brand of bullshit! The only way that any sort of a deal will ever be reached will be if the Republicans capitulate completely on taxes and demand no spending cuts be made in exchange. And, sadly, with Boehner leading the charge on our side such a ‘deal’ is not totally outside the realm of possibility. Meanwhile, the rest of us must all come to the realization that there are actually more important things to worry about than going over the cliff.

'SLOW JOE' BIDEN STEPS IN FOR OBAMA AT NAACP...



Playing to what was described as being a very nearly empty house, a fact that was apparently blamed on some inclement weather in the area, our stellar vice president, 'Slow Joe' Biden, in typical fashion, chose to use race as more of a way to divide, than to bring together, as he pushed NAACP convention attendees to contrast Barry "Almighty’s" Department of Justice with a potential Mitt Romney DOJ. "Imagine what the Romney Justice Department will look like," Biden told those few in the NAACP audience who had bothered to show up on Thursday to hear him speak. He went on, "Imagine when his senior advisor on constitutional issues is Robert Bork. Imagine those incredibly important positions of justice. Imagine, and I mean this, this to me is one of the most critical issues in this election, imagine what the Supreme Court will look like after four years of a Romney presidency." Is this guy a piece of work, or what? And yet, blacks continue to eat this stuff up. And I'm sure that comment of old 'Slow Joe's' most likely went over pretty well with the racist NAACP members gathered in attendance since it was on Tuesday that the NAACP 'unanimously' passed what was referred to as being an "emergency resolution" calling the bipartisan votes to hold Attorney General Eric Holder in criminal and civil contempt of Congress a "travesty of justice." The resolution, I suppose, was intended to be a method by which the NAACP could "express their outrage at the treatment of the first African-American and one of the best attorney generals in history." As the resolution passed, Holder, who is most likely the worst Attorney General since Janet Reno, arrived to a rock-star greeting, walking around shaking the hands of many of those in attendance. During his speech at the NAACP on Wednesday, Romney avoided the topic of justice issues choosing, instead, to focus on the issues of the economy and education. Over the course of the campaign Romney hasn’t said much on what his DOJ would look like if he wins the November election, but he has criticized Barry’s DOJ, and especially Holder. "There’s not very much that Eric Holder does that I agree with," Romney said at a campaign event late in 2011 in New Hampshire. "I have to wonder how it is that the president continues to support him, and the answer must be the president agrees with him," he added. Romney has called for Holder's resignation over Operation Fast and Furious, too. And he joins 130 House members, eight U.S. senators and two sitting governors in demanding Holder’s resignation over the scandal. Maybe the NAACP folks might be a little less forgiving if it was a black border agent that had gotten killed courtesy of Fast and Furious. But then maybe not. After all 200 black men have thus far been murdered in Chicago just this year, and yet where's the outrage there? Not important enough of an issue for the DOJ? "Either Mr. Holder himself should resign or the president should ask for his resignation or remove him," Romney said in early December 2011. "It’s not acceptable for him to continue in that position given the fact that he has misled Congress and entirely botched the investigation of the Fast and Furious program." Romney also supports voter ID laws, something Holder and Barry’s administration vehemently oppose. Holder even went to far as to promise those at the NAACP gathering that he would prevent the Texas version of the law from going forward. The former Massachusetts governor has also made Barry’s decision to assert executive privilege over Fast and Furious documents a bit of a campaign issue lately. On Sean Hannity’s radio program and on Neil Cavuto’s Fox News Channel show this week, Romney responded to Barry’s "transparency" attacks on him by pointing out how Barry is doing everything he can to keep concealed Fast and Furious documents. I still say that it's a very sad commentary on a group that was initially brought together for very honorable reasons, and based on such high ideals and sound principles to have, today, deteriorated into its present state and to the point where it is merely a shadow of it's former self. At some point there must have been a conscious decision made to abandon all those for whom it could provide some service or benefit, to instead, become, what essentially amounts to nothing more than an extension of the Democrat Party. If the members in attendance here were actually behaving true to the founding principles or their organization, Biden should have been the one on the receiving end of any boos, not Romney. Romney should have been the recipient of any number of standing ovations. If there is anything that was made abundantly clear, it's the fact that the priorities of this group have become skewed to where the possessing of at least some level of political power now far outweighs the needs of the black individual.

DYNAMITE AD BY THE CATHOLIC CHURCH...

OBAMA BLAMES..."HEADWINDS"...

ANOTHER DEMOCRAT SLAMS OBAMA CAMPAIGN...QUESTIONS TACTICS...

OBAMA SAYS HUGE PUBLIC SECTOR IS KEY TO HEALTHY ECONOMY…

I think it very fair to say that I think a good many of us are well aware of the fact that Barry, our ‘Dear Beloved Leader’, has never been a big fan of our current economic system or of the private sector workers required to keep it moving. And by now I’m sure we all Barry say, yesterday that the private sector "is doing just fine." And after being forced into clarifying that nutty statement, how he would come back later saying "it is absolutely clear that the economy is not doing fine." He nonetheless repeated again the rebound in private-sector job growth and corporate profits to contend that the private sector has "not been the biggest drag on the economy." He continued to stand by his claim that is factually incorrect, in others words a lie, in which he stated, "The truth of the matter is that … we've created 4.3 million jobs over the last 27 months, over 800,000 just this year alone." So he essentially stand by his claim saying, "Where we're seeing weaknesses in our economy have to do with state and local government." So, at least according to Barry, the solution to getting our economy moving again lies not in creating more private sector jobs, but instead creating many more government jobs. In other words to further expand the size of government. DUH?

Now in making his original cockamamie claim that "the private sector is doing fine," Barry seemed to, once again, blame all but himself. He said, "Where we’re seeing weaknesses in our economy, have to do with state and local government -- oftentimes, cuts initiated by governors or mayors who are not getting the kind of help that they have in the past from the federal government and who don’t have the same kind of flexibility as the federal government in dealing with fewer revenues coming in." But state and local leaders were not the only ones to be blamed for our bad economy, nope, not by a long shot. At least according to Barry, it’s also all of the Republicans in Congress. "If Republicans want to be helpful, if they really want to move forward, and put people back to work, what they should be thinking about is, ‘How do we help state and local governments and how do we help the construction industry?’" Barry said. "Because the recipes that they’re promoting are basically the kinds of policies that would add weakness to the economy, would result in further layoffs, would not provide relief in the housing market, and would result – I think most economists would estimate – in lower growth." Now I may not be a graduate of the Harvard Law School, but this just doesn’t make much sense to me.

Barry’s remarks about there not being enough state employees, strangely enough, came during the same week that Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker, a Republican I might add, survived a union-backed recall election because he curbed some of the state employee benefits and collective bargaining rules. Walker, as we also know, went on to win the recall by a 9 percent margin, 54 to 45 percent. "I was extremely disappointed to hear the president assert this morning that ‘the private sector is doing fine,’" Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wisc.) said in a press release today. "Just as disappointing was his statement, ‘where we’re seeing weaknesses in our economy had to do with state and local government’ and what our nation needs is an expansion of government to cure our economic ills." Sen. Johnson added, "We have had 40 consecutive months of unemployment above 8 percent." He added, "The economy is teetering on the edge of recession. And just last Friday, the Obama administration announced that unemployment is on the rise. This president may be seriously out of touch with reality, and that is frightening." Unemployment rose from 8.1 percent in April to 8.2 percent in May, according to the U.S. Labor Department. Real GDP growth for the first quarter of 2012 was 1.9 percent.

"The economy is not fine. Private sector job creation is not fine," Johnson continued. And in hitting the nail squarely on the head, Sen. Johnson added, "Millions of Americans are suffering from the president’s constant focus on growing government, instead of reasonable, bipartisan steps to promote private-sector job creation. It is high time we had a president who was focused on economic growth. It is time for a change in course. It’s time for real leadership." And I could not agree more with the senator’s assessment of the situation, it is in fact dire. There has been no leadership demonstrated by Barry in the area of creating real, meaningful, private sector jobs since he first came strutting into the Oval Office. NONE. Name one job creating initiative that was put forward during the first two years of his administration when he had huge majorities in both houses of Congress. There wasn’t one, because the focus was, instead, on the takeover of our healthcare industry. Hundreds of billions of dollars were wasted under the guise of some bogus ‘stimulus’ bill that we were told would keep unemployment at or below 8 percent. Never happened! Because in reality it was nothing more than a slush fund to be used by Barry’s Democrat cronies. Let’s face it, we’ve been lied to by this guy since day one, he’s gotta go!

ANOTHER PARANOID BLACK GOES AFTER ROMNEY...



Caucasia-Stan? Really? Sounds like this supposedly intelligent black woman, besides demonstrating just how much of a moron she is, might also be a bit of a racist. Ya know, with people like her it's always gotta be about what's best for those po' black folk. It can never be about what's actually best for the country. And trust me when I say, Barack Hussein Obama, hm hm hm, is not in any way what's best for this country. In spite of what Ms. Hunter may think!

REP. JOE WALSH IS OK IN MY BOOK...

HOW THE PRICE OF GAS HAS GONE UP UNDER OBAMA...

SO, GENDERCIDE IS PROTECTED BY THE CONSTITUTION?

ALLEN WESTS TALKS ABOUT OBAMA "DOIN BLOW"...

"HOPE AND CHANGE" STILL?

DEMOCRAT CORRUPTION ALIVE AND WELL, AND LIVING IN ILLINOIS...

GOV. CHRISTIE VERSUS "NUTTY" MSNBC HOST

The governor is only telling it like it is.

ROSIE “O’DIPSHIT” AND OLD JOY BEHAR DISCUSS NEWT

Well we now know how it is that at least these two liberal morons feel about one GOP candidate in particular, and most likely, how they feel about all of them. Since leaving that rather odd assortment of "ladies" referred to as The View, Rosie O’Donnell has continued to find various ways to get her fat mug on television screens and media outlets via headlines in various gossip magazines, a show on the new, and ratings challenged, Oprah Winfrey Network as well as occasional guest appearances on Curb Your Enthusiasm. Appearing on the, soon to be defunct, HLN show of her former fellow left-leaning bimbo, on the aforementioned The View, O’Donnell somehow felt qualified to offer her rather bizarre opinion on current affairs. She seemed to have a lot to say about former Speaker of the House, college history professor and prolific author of books on history, Newt Gingrich. Now let’s be real here, most likely the only books this moron has ever read had very large pictures that you use crayons to color in, and very small words.

OUR FIGHT SONG FOR 2012

I was sitting at a stoplight the other night on my way home from work when a song came on the radio that I hadn’t heard in quite some time. It was one of those old songs that, you know, can somehow magically take you back to another place and another time for just that briefest of moments. Anyway, it was an old Merle Haggard song entitled, "The Fightin' Side of Me." and as I listened to it I remembered exactly why it was that it had been one of my favorite songs at a time when I was much younger and as I listened I realized that it is still one of my favorite songs today. And I thought about how relevant the lyrics still seem to be even today, especially when one considers what the Liberal Democrats, our stellar our president, acting in concert with our state-run media, are all saying about our country on pretty much of a daily basis. Also as I listened, it struck me how this simple little song would make the perfect anthem to be sung by those who are currently working so hard to bring about a much needed conservative revolution, come this November, because it seemed to me that the words of the song cut to the very core of what it is that’s being perpetrated against the very foundations of the country. The feelings it stirred in me were the very same ones that I remember feeling when I heard the song for the very first time, because I love my country, to the point where I proudly spent a big chunk of my life in the service of her Navy. And I think it sums up pretty well the way many of us still feel about our country and about the attempts made by Barry "Almighty" and the rest of the "scumbag" Democrats who constantly work to demean it and all that it stands for. It’s a song that not only tells it like it is, but how it should be. That our country, regardless of what Barry "Almighty" and the Democrats may say or do, is special and possesses a uniqueness found nowhere else on the planet, and we should be proud to called Americans, not shy away from it. We must fight contemptible individuals who continually go about the slandering of our country 24/7 and who should be seen for exactly what they are, as being nothing more than anti-Freedom and anti-American zealots. Their behavior is to be considered as being nothing less than traitorous and they should be condemned at every opportunity. Because we do live in the greatest nation in the World and we must work to do all that we can to come together and unite in putting a stop to what is being done by those who are determined to destroy it. And to all those who insist on griping about this country, if you don’t love it, then just do us all a big favor and leave it. You are not needed here nor are you welcome here.

I have included the words here just in case there are those of you out there who are not familiar with it because either you don't listen to country music or because maybe it was just a little bit before your time.

I hear people talkin' bad,
About the way we have to live here in this country,
Harpin' on the wars we fight,
An' gripin' 'bout the way things oughta be.
An' I don't mind 'em switchin' sides,
An' standin' up for things they believe in.
When they're runnin' down my country, man,
They're walkin' on the fightin' side of me.

Yeah, walkin' on the fightin' side of me.
Runnin' down the way of life,
Our fightin' men have fought and died to keep.
If you don't love it, leave it:
Let this song I'm singin' be a warnin'.
If you're runnin' down my country, man,
You're walkin' on the fightin' side of me.

I read about some squirrely guy,
Who claims, he just don't believe in fightin'.
An' I wonder just how long,
The rest of us can count on bein' free.
They love our milk an' honey,
But they preach about some other way of livin'.
When they're runnin' down my country, hoss,
They're walkin' on the fightin' side of me.

Yeah, walkin' on the fightin' side of me.
Runnin' down the way of life,
Our fightin' men have fought and died to keep.
If you don't love it, leave it:
Let this song I'm singin' be a warnin'.
If you're runnin' down my country, man,
You're walkin' on the fightin' side of me.

Yeah, walkin' on the fightin' side of me.
Runnin' down the way of life,
Our fightin' men have fought and died to keep.
If you don't love it, leave it:
Let this song I'm singin' be a warnin'.
If you're runnin' down my country, man,
You're walkin' on the fightin' side of me.

DEMOCRATS COULD LEARN A LOT FROM RED SKELTON

The words of Mr. Red Skelton:

"On January 14, 1969, I presented "The Little Old Man" as a teacher. The time was 1923.The students had finished reciting the Pledge of Allegiance which at the time was but 10 years old. The old sage called the children together and said--
"Boys and girls, I have been listening to you recite the Pledge of Allegiance all semester and it appears that it has become monotonous to you or could it be you do not know the meaning of those words. If I may, I would like to recite the Pledge and give to you a definition of the words.
I----meaning me, an individual, a committee of one.
Pledge----dedicate all of my worldly goods to give without self pity.
Allegiance----my love and my devotion.
To the Flag----our standard, Old Glory, a symbol of freedom. Wherever she waves, there is respect because your loyalty has given her a dignity that shouts freedom is everybody's job.
Of the United----that means that we have all come together.
States----individual communities that have united into 48 great states. 48 individual communities with pride and dignity and purpose, all divided with imaginary boundaries, yet united to a common cause, and that's love of country.
Of America.
And to the Republic----a republic, a state in which sovereign power is invested in representatives chosen by the people to govern. And government is the people and it's from the people to the leaders, not from the leaders to the people.
For which it stands!
One nation----meaning, so blessed by God.
Indivisible----incapable of being divided.
With Liberty----which is freedom and the right of power to live one's life without threats or fear or any sort of retaliation.
And justice----The principle and quality of dealing fairly with others.
For all.----which means, boys and girls, it's as much your country as it is mine.

Since I was a small boy, two states have been added to our nation, and two words have been added to the Pledge of Allegiance "under God." Wouldn't it be a pity if someone said, "That's a prayer" and that would be eliminated from schools, too?"

Me and my family used to watch Mr. Skelton every week. His show was one we tried very hard to never miss, always making sure we were home in time to watch. I remember laughing hyterically from beginning to end every single week at the characters he was able to bring to life. He was just a funny, funny man, and one of those rare individuals that we are so seldom blessed with. And he was also a man who fit anyones definition of a true patriot. Which, I'm afraid, is something that cannot be said of our pathetic president nor, sadly, a majority of today's Democrats!

THANK YOU OBAMA

I am, like most Americans, clearly worse off that I was just since this past spring. And I have proof to back up my claim in that I can very easily point to a new Federal Reserve report. It’s that report that shows that the average U.S. household lost $21,261 of net worth over the summer months. Can you imagine losing over $20,000? Now I’m sure that’s not much money, in the big scheme of things, to Barry, but it’s a ton of money to me. Both my wife and I are military retirees, and our tax bill swallows the entire amount of my wife’s retirement.

Of course none of this should come as big news to Barry "Almighty," after all, it’s his policies that have brought this all about. The same Barry who went on record during an exchange with ABC’s Georgie Stephanopoulos in October saying that Americans are not better off than they were before he moved into the White House.   "Well, I don't think they're better off than they were four years ago," Barry said at that time. "They're not better off than they were before Lehman collapsed, before the financial crisis, before this extraordinary recession that we're going through." Duh?

Barry, however, pointed to supposed progress in stabilizing the economy during the same interview. "I think that what we've seen is that we've been able to make steady progress to stabilize the economy, but the unemployment rate is still way too high. And that's why it's so critical for us to make sure that we are taking every action we can take to put people back to work." Just how is it that Barry defines "steady progress?" He talks about taking "every action" to put people back to work, but he is absolutely resolute against taking any sort of action that will accomplish doing just that!

Attributed to falling home values and a tumultuous stock market, the third-quarter decline marked the second straight quarter of eroding net wealth for U.S. households. The news comes at a time when the president has already received sharp criticism over a reported 17-day Hawaiian Christmas vacation in an exclusive beach-front residence in Kailua, Oahu and for his lack of leadership. A vacation that, after receiving a significant amount of pressure of potential adversaries, he has backed off of for now after receiving a considerable amount of criticism.

Barry’s favorite vacation spot described as being the "Winter White House," the rental has been estimated to cost as much as $3,500 a day or $75,000 a month. Our "Dear Beloved Leader" has also come under mounting criticism for failing to demonstrate any sort of leadership and has been described as sitting on the sidelines, acting as nothing more as a spectator during the collapse of the congressional budget supercommittee. A supposed bipartisan group which was unable to reach agreement on ways to solve the country’s debt crisis.

As the supercommittee neared its deadline, the president was off the mainland U.S. for nine days, hosting an Asian-Pacific summit in Hawaii before jetting off to Australia and Indonesia. Meanwhile, two straight quarterly declines in household net worth have cost U.S. families a combined $2.55 trillion, that according to the New York Post report. Household net worth is considered to be the value of homes, bank accounts and stocks less mortgages, credit cards and other debt. It is hard to fathom that everyday Americans have seen such a significant loss in the net worth, and yet we have all thanks to Barry.

The overall net worth of households declined from $511,224 at the start of 2011 to just $498,751 as of Sept. 30. The decline follows an average increase of $9,757 per household between January and March that was offset slightly by a $912 decline in the second quarter.Overall, about 15 cents of every $1 of U.S. household wealth is tied to stocks or mutual funds, which are held by about half of all households. The Fed found that stock portfolios declined by about 5.2 percent in the third quarter, while home process dropped slightly more than half a percent. Home values dropped to $16.1 trillion from $21 trillion in 2007, according to the Post.

So how many of us are better off that we were before Barry "Almighty" came into office. The electing of Barry has been a self-inflicted wound of such a magnitude that it may in the end prove to be fatal when it comes to the survival of our way of life. "Hope and Change" was all a mirage, a ploy of you will, designed to inspire us, to lull us into a false sense that we could build upon what we had. Instead, "Hope and Change" was all about tearing down.
It was about bringing about a "fundamental transformation" of this country. And a direct result as been a massive loss in net worth by those of us in he middle class.

MY MAN RICK!