HOLLYWEIRD CONTINUES TO GET WEIRDER AND WEIRDER…

So there they all were, those described as being the hottest talent in television and all gathered in one place and to do little more than to celebrate themselves at the 68th annual Emmy Awards.  And yet with all of that supposed talent amassed there in that one big room, he who was arguably the night’s biggest star was not even in the room.  Because it was Donald Trump who both presenters and winners seemed almost compelled to talk about.  Now while refused to subject myself to the goings on, I did hear how these buffoons couldn’t help but talk about Trump.  Why is it that anyone other than leftwing kooks even bother watching awards shows anymore?  After all, they’ve become so predictable, and just oh so tedious.  Over the years I think we’ve all become quite familiar with how it that nearly every awards show, be it the Emmy, Oscars, or Golden Globes, or even the Espys, typically go.  One seems to be a carbon copy of all the others.

You see, it’s always during the opening monologue and presenter-introductions that the host of any of these shows will go out of his, or her, way to skewer conservatives, and in the case of Sunday's Emmy Awards, it was the Republican presidential nominee, complete with all the requisite Hitler-references.  And of course the smug audience stacked with privileged 1-percenters will laugh heartily at conservatives' expense.   Most, if not all, of the awards will go to smug 1-percenters who believe that by scripting, directing or acting in some idiotic late-night sit-com they are doing nothing less than God's work.  And in accepting their award they will use their acceptance speech as a soapbox from which to "thank Hitlery Clinton" and lecture us Philistines on the importance of providing equal opportunities to women, transgenders, Hispanics, blacks, refugees, the disabled, pigmies, circus performers, etc, etc, etc.

Host Jimmy Kimmel who, I must admit, I have never been a fan of, apparently got the Trump ball rolling early by blaming ‘Apprentice’ producer Mark Burnett for what he said was allowing Trump to rise to prominence on national TV.  Kimmel said, “If it wasn’t for television, would Donald Trump be running for president? No, he would be at home right now quietly rubbing up against Malaria while she pretends to be asleep,” Kimmel joked, apparently intentionally mispronouncing Melania Trump’s name.   And it was this hapless boob who then went on to say, “Thanks to Mark Burnett, we don’t have to watch reality television shows anymore, because we’re living in one.”  And he added, “I’m going on the record right now, he’s responsible. If Donald Trump gets elected, and he builds that wall, the first person we’re throwing over is Mark Burnett.”  A line that I’m quite sure earned him a rather sizable big laugh. 

But Kimmel was far from being the only celebrity to reference Trump’s proposed wall on the U.S.-Mexico border.  Because it was in accepting the Emmy for Best Actress in a Comedy Series, ultra-liberal kook Louis-Dreyfus actually apologized for her role on Veep.  She said, "I'd like to personally apologize for the current political climate. I think that Veep has torn down the wall between comedy and politics.  Our show started out as a political satire, but now seems like a documentary.  So, I certainly do promise to rebuild that wall and make Mexico pay for it."   Despite the relentless politicking, rumor has that Sunday night’s show was eminently more watchable than last year’s ratings-disaster broadcast on Fox with Andy Samberg at the helm.  But since I didn’t watch last year either I really don’t know if this year’s telecast was any more watchable or not.  I suppose whether one enjoys watching such antics depends a great deal on the reason that you’re watching in the first place.  

And as the festivities progressed it was ‘Transparent’ creator Jill Soloway, onstage to accept the award for Best Directing for a Comedy Series, who ended her speech by triumphantly shouting “Topple the patriarchy!” and then let loose on Trump in a backstage interview.  Soloway said “Transparent’s” second season storyline that went back in time to the Holocaust was “incredibly timely” given the state of the presidential race.  In her view, Trump’s position on immigration and law enforcement is akin to the dynamics that led to Hitler’s rise to power.  She said, “Jews were other-ized in Nazi Germany to gain political power for Hitler, and right now Donald Trump is doing the same thing.”  Soloway went on to say, “He’s other-izing people. He calls women pigs if they don’t look like beauty pageant contestants; he blames Muslims and Mexicans for our problems; he makes fun of disabled people, this is otherizing with a capital ‘O.'”

It then that this crackpot, Soloway, went on to say, “He needs to be called out at every chance he gets for being one of the most dangerous monsters to ever approach our lifetimes,” Soloway told reporters backstage. “He’s a complete dangerous monster, and any moment that I have to call Trump out for being an inheritor to Hitler, I will.”  This is the level of insanity that has now invaded our society .  While there was once a time that I actually enjoyed watching these shows, that was back during a time when those accepting their awards limited their speeches to thanking “Mom and Dad”, or their supporting cast, or the many people involved in making their job easy.  So as you can plainly see it’s been decades since I last watched one of these idiotic examples of self-congratulating, egotistical imbeciles coming together to applaud themselves.  These shows log ago ceased being entertaining and became nothing more than insulting. 

Personally I’m hoping that those who have promised to leave the country, many of whom were in the audience that night, if Trump wins, will make good on that promise.  These Hollywood losers certainly do regard themselves and their opinions as being worthy of being listened to, but they don’t fool most of the folks in flyover country who consider them to be the lowest of the low.  And at a time when we now have the FEC making noises about regulating sites like Drudge, and Brietbart as if they’re political contributions, I wonder if the same will go for events like this, or the selective editing of CNN or their blatant on air admissions that they're in the tank for Hillary.  Frankly, I doubt it.  And then we have Barry, Hitlery, Cuomo and DeBlasio, Communists all, who actually welcome terrorists into our country.  Killing us off is what they want!  They prefer to restock the well with people who have never known freedom and will take to their ways and commands.

I long ago stopped going to the movies, and these days I watch very little television, as most of the shows pretty much suck.  Although I will confess that I do watch both Game of Thrones and Black Sails.  I have very little tolerance for these holier-than-thou individuals who seem to think that just because they can act or sing or play some sport that that somehow makes them a better person than me.  No, all that it does is to make them a better actor, or singer or athlete.  And that’s all that it does.  It doesn’t make their opinion on any given subject any better than mine.  And when you stop to consider the fact that a significant percentage of these loons weren’t even smart enough to make it all the way through high school you come to the conclusion that anything they have to say on nearly any topic is all the more meaningless.  These clowns who have contributed absolutely nothing to society feel free to criticize a man who has employed thousands. 

LOOK, THERE’S A REASON ‘CRAZY UNCLE JOHN’ KASICH ISN’T THE NOMINEE…

You know, there are times in every man’s life when you’ve just got to put your big boy pants on and do what you know needs to be done.  And while it may not be easy, you just do it.  But apparently ‘Crazy Uncle John’ Kasich just can’t bring himself to do that which cannot now be left undone.  And that would be to vote for Donald Trump.  And while he’s not completely ruling out voting for Trump, he does say that it's "highly unlikely" that he'll support his former Republican rival.  And while he did say that he will not be voting for Hitlery, can we really trust him to not do so?  After all, if he lied about supporting whomever would become the eventual Republican nominee, and now refuses to do so, how do we know he’s not lying about voting for Hitlery?  And is not voting for Trump essentially the same thing as voting FOR Hitlery?

It was regarding his potential support for Trump that Kasich told Dana Bash, this past Thursday, in an interview on the Clinton News Network (CNN): “I’ll let everybody know when, but I think my actions have spoken very loudly, louder than even my words.”  And it was when Bash asked if it was still possible he would vote for Trump that Kasich said, “Very unlikely.”  Kasich then added, “Too much water under the bridge.”  And when asked if Trump were to win?  It was in referencing a potential Trump victory in November that Kasich responded, “Well, we’ll see what happens if that happens.”  Kasich went on to say, “Whoever is the president, if I can do something to help them in a constructive way, and something I agree on, absolutely.”  Somehow I see him as being more willing to help Hitlery than vote for Trump.

Kasich, a former 2016 GOP presidential candidate himself, said it’s still important to work on getting out the vote for people like Sen. Rob Portman, who’s running for re-election there in Ohio.  He said, “We want to get people out to vote. We want to re-elect Senator Portman, and we want to re-elect people down ticket.”   Kasich was in Cleveland during the Republican National Convention (RNC) in July, but chose not attend the convention.  Asked about Libertarian nominee Gary Johnson, Kasich said: “I haven’t even gone there yet. It’s a long way [until] Election Day.”  Kasich has been one of a few former Trump rivals to withhold their endorsement, despite an earlier pledge to back the eventual nominee, whomever it turned out to be.  Ted Cruz and Jeb Bush have also refused to get behind Trump.

And then it was just this past Thursday that news broke detailing how is was that Barry had enlisted Kasich to assist him in what will likely turn out to be Barry’s final push for his stalled Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) trade deal.  And Kasich did attend a bipartisan meeting yesterday, at the White House, the purpose of which was to tout the supposed benefits of the Asia-Pacific trade agreement.  Kasich has said that he feels it's his "responsibility and duty as a leader", no matter what the political cost, to help Barry shepherd the TPP through Congress.  After hearing Kasich make such a declaration should we be all that surprised to hear that it’s unlikely he will be voting for Trump?  How low is it to support the man who has done so much damage to our country and refuse to support your party’s candidate as the man to replace him? 

It was later at a White House press briefing that Kasich said, "I have never been an ideological supporter of free trade. The ideologues use to come to me and be frustrated with me."  He went on to say, "But when you look at these agreements in a real sense - and this one is much different than even NAFTA."  And he added, "This is China. This is Russia. These are fledgling countries in Asia and we want to pivot to Asia? We have to do this."  Kasich met with Barry in the Oval Office yesterday. And it was in the interview with CNN on Thursday night that he said he doesn't mind the political backlash he could face.  Kasich said, "I welcome the fact that people will criticize me for putting my country ahead of my party."  Personally, I think it’s that statement which sums up rather nicely why Trump is our nominee and Kasich isn’t.

And oddly enough if recent polls there in Kasich’s home state of Ohio can be said to be in any way accurate, it would seem that based on some of the latest numbers, ‘Crazy Uncle John’ is of a different opinion, regarding Trump, than are, at least for now, what appears to be a majority of those people over whom that he governs.  Most now seem to be choosing Trump over Hitlery!  So maybe Kasich should have been a knee taking quarterback instead of a politician as he is becoming more and more like Obummer every single day.  He seems to need constant attention and it matters little how he comes by it, with there being no limit to his ignorant, stupid and childish rants.  And honestly, it isn't the slightest bit surprising that Kasich isn't going to vote for Trump - his position has been pretty obvious for months now.

I suppose I would argue that the only logical next step here for ‘Crazy Uncle’ John would be for him to think things through and determine for himself whether he merely doesn't support Trump, or that he actually believes Trump would be detrimental to this country were he to be elected.  And if he thinks that that is possible, let alone probable, then I feel he’ll very little trouble talking himself into voting for Hitlery.  The fact is that he'll likely end up like most of the NeverTrump crowd, holding his nose while he goes about voting for her.  Kasich's position has been clear about as long as he’s been governor.  He’s an open borders, Obamacare-loving, Big Government ''Republican'', and he is as phony as a three dollar bill. Would you possibly expect this fraud to support anybody other than himself?

And while he's not pushing Trump in Ohio, where polling this week has indicated a pretty tight race, Kasich said he would still be working to get Republicans to the polls in general.  He said, "We're going to go help people get the vote out, obviously."  And added, "Get Republicans out to vote, period."  He went on to say, "We want to reelect Sen. [Rob] Portman and we want to reelect people down-ticket."  If that’s how he wants to approach things that’s fine, but my confidence level in the Republicans being able to maintain their control of the Senate, after 2 years of what has been the abysmal ‘leadership’ by McConnell, is pretty low regardless of whether Trump wins or not.  In fact it’s because of RINOs like McConnell and Ryan, as well as Kasich himself, that Trump is now our nominee in the first place.

And as far as him honoring his pledge to vote for the winner of the Republican primary process, or failing to do so, have just held his nose and said that he intends to vote for Trump because the alternative is so very much worse.  Kasich is quite likely political toast except there in his own State and will be forever known as a man without honor!  This man, along with every other then-candidate, vowed in front of millions of Americans to support and to vote for whatever candidate it was that the American people would come to choose.  He along with all the others have demonstrated to the American people their complete lack of integrity and shown to the American people that they have NEVER been FOR the people.  They are self-serving, dishonest, corrupt politicians that have NEVER been representing America.

Which should cause one to wonder why it is that the RNC, or any Republican politician for that matter, claim to be so clueless when it comes to why it is that so many of the American people no longer possesses any level of trust in their government.  Bush, Cruz and Graham are not supporting the Republican Candidate after they very publicly signed an agreement that they would. The American Public no longer ignores political such liars.  And you can add to that mix this crybaby who is also unwilling to honor his word.  He just thought he was so deserving, and that the vast majority of voters would come to agree with him.  But he has yet to realize that he was overwhelmingly rejected in the primaries and in the general election he is pretty much irrelevant.  And after a Trump inauguration he will be all but forgotten.

Washington insiders are used to making pledges to voters that they never intend to keep.  Kasich is no different which proves he’s not fit for public office. He thinks what he’s doing "is honorable."  This is why they're on the way out and why Trump may be on his way to becoming POTUS.  Americans are tired of being betrayed by the people they put into office.  And I would argue that had just a few of those who we elected, at least on the Republican side, in every election since 2010 had kept just a few of the many promises they made to we the Republican voters, Trump would not now be in the position where we now find him.  But because they were unable to do that they have no one to blame but themselves for the fact the Trump is now our nominee.  So they just need to get over themselves.

SHELDON WHITEHOUSE, DEMOCRAT AND POSTER BOY FOR THE POLITICALLY CORRUPT…

If those on the left were so confident that their ideas were the best ideas, then why is it that they insist upon expending so much time, energy and trickery on their effort to squelch the ideas of their opposition?  And if the Democrat Party were truly the party of diversity and inclusiveness why not welcome a bona fide discussion on just which ideas would actually benefit the country?   But you see that just isn’t how these people operate.  They will always see themselves as being the smartest people in the room and therefore see always themselves as the folks with the better ideas.  This despite the fact that their ideas rarely, if ever, are known to work.  But even though their ideas never quite pan out, that hasn’t kept them from implementing them. 

Which brings me to some recently released federal documents that would seem to reveal how it was that a certain Democrat senator sought Justice Department and IRS Criminal prosecutions of conservatives back in 2013.  The Department of Justice documents reveal email conversations that took place between its officials and the staff of Rhode Island Democrat Sheldon Whitehouse about possible criminal prosecution of Tea Party groups for alleged violation of IRS rules, according to material obtained by Judicial Watch, a government watchdog.  The conversations were in preparation for a briefing by Justice Department officials for Whitehouse's staff and for a Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Crime and Terrorism hearing.

Judicial Watch released 72 emails this past Wednesday indicating that Whitehouse had pushed, and pretty aggressively, the Department of Justice and the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) to prosecute Tea Party groups that made false statements to the agency in the past.  It was according to internal emails that Whitehouse wanted to know why the Justice Department was acting so deferential toward the IRS in determining a punishment against conservatives.  One of those internal emails read: “Sen. Whitehouse is curious why, for example, if a 501(c) tax organization files were leaked, and they clearly showed that make false statements,” then “why the Department of Justice wouldn’t prosecute the case by itself and not wait for the IRS.”

And in one exchange that took place, Whitehouse says, "I would urge that the Department and the Service get together and rethink whether in these two specific areas, which I think bear little resemblance to traditional tax violations and are in fact very plain-vanilla criminal cases..”  He asks whether "the Department could not proceed to… put together a criminal case showing a fairly straightforward false statement or a fairly [straightforward] shell corporation disclosure violation."  According to Judicial Watch, the organizations Whitehouse mentioned included American Future Fund, Crossroads GPS, Americans for Responsible Leadership, Freedom Path, American is Not Stupid, Inc., RightChange.com II, and A Better America Now — all of which are conservative organizations.

According to FBI documents obtained in August, IRS officials orchestrated a scheme starting in 2010 and continuing through 2012 that dumped conservative and Tea Party non-profit applicants into a bureaucratic “black hole.”  The documents also described how the agency targeted the conservative non-profit groups, culminating in an investigation that eventually led to IRS official Lois Lerner being allowed to retire when she should have gone to prison.  But since she was viewed, by Democrats, as one of the good guys she was allowed to receive what I am sure is a big fat government pension.  Had the focus been on liberal non-profit groups and not conservative ones, I’m sure the outcome for Ms. Lerner would have been different. 

The group obtained the documents through a federal court order in a Judicial Watch Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit.  The six-year-old scandal is still affecting conservatives presently, Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton said in a press statement attached to the published emails.  Mr. Fitton said, "The Obama IRS scandal includes abuse of power by Democrats in Congress who wanted to jail Obama's political opponents to help secure Obama's reelection."  And Mr. Fitton went on to say, "And Americans should know that the courts have recently concluded the Obama IRS abuses haven't stopped — even as we approach another presidential election."  That should come as no surprise since Barry sees himself as being above the courts.

Whitehouse is certainly no stranger to politically charged investigations, as he has also argued the Justice Department should launch a racketeering case against those fossil fuel companies who cast doubt on the liberal ‘global warming’ position.  The former Rhode Island attorney general along with Democrat Rep. Ted Lieu introduced resolutions in both chambers of Congress in July that “urges fossil fuel companies and allied organizations to cooperate with active or future investigations into their climate-change related activities.”   Whitehouse also directed 19 of his fellow Democrat senators in to attack conservative and libertarian organizations such as Americans for Prosperity and the Cato Institute on the chamber floors for engaging in what the senators called a “web of denial.”

Because, you see, when it comes to ‘global warming’, Democrats have now made the decision that ‘global warming’ is real, so therefore no further discussion on the topic is warranted.  Now it matters not that science is not on their side, the only thing that matters is the fact that the Democrat Party fully supports this little scheme, seeing it as a means of essentially killing two birds with one stone.  First, they view it as being yet another way for them to creep even further into our lives and even right into our homes.  But also, and maybe even more importantly, it would provide them a very lucrative way to generated rather significant amounts of from a ‘carbon tax’ and then direct it into the government’s coffers.  

In wrapping things up here I can’t help but ask, even though I already know the answer, can you possibly imagine the uproar, from Democrats across the country as we as from those in the state-controlled media, had this been a Republican senator who was encouraging the Department of Justice and the IRS to go after groups that were primarily liberal in their political philosophy?  And don't ever forget that pond scum like Whitehouse will attempt to suppress the free speech of anyone that they feel opposes their philosophies.  They will refuse to allow conservative organizations on campus. They will selectively prosecute and persecute any and all who dare to oppose them. They want to turn the USA into a Marxist Socialist dictatorship.

Finally I’d like to take just a moment to focus on those who saw fit to first elect this leftist buffoon to the Senate in 2006 and then to ‘re-elect’ him in 2012.  And I have to wonder, just how morally bankrupt is the state of Rhode Island?  Is it a state full of nothing more than Colin Kaepernick wannabes who take a knee every time the nation anthem is played?  I mean, I have to wonder about people who willingly elect someone who seeks to have those who disagree with him investigated and those who choose to disagree with the policies of his party prosecuted.  Just how anti-America, or, dare I say, anti-freedom are these people?  The Rhode Island state motto is, “Hope.”  But “Hope” for what, I wonder.

OBAMA, A LEGEND IN HIS OWN MIND…

Rarely during the span of one’s lifetime does one turn out to be unfortunate enough to ever witness someone who possesses the level of arrogance and self-importance as does Barry “Almighty”.  And it was during a recent campaign rally for Hitlery in Philadelphia, that Barry just couldn’t seem to stop him from blowing his horn as loud as he possibly could.  Remembering that the purpose for him being where he was, was to act as a surrogate for Hitlery.  So it seemed strange that he seemed to be far more interested in talking only about himself.  And it was in so doing that he actually mentioned himself over 130 times.

Barry said, "I've seen in America that for all the challenges, for all the noise of the politics, still has the capacity to come together and do great things."  He said, "We fought our way back from the worst recession in 80 years. We turned around a declining economy. We helped our auto industry set new records. Our businesses created 15 million new jobs. Slashed our dependence on foreign oil. Doubled our production of clean energy. Made marriage equality a reality in all 50 states." Barry continued to list ‘achievements’, including the death of Osama Bin Laden, new diplomatic relations with Cuba, and the nuclear deal with Iran.

And then at one point, after running down the list of those things which HE considered as being the accomplishments of his presidency, someone in the audience shouted out about lower gas prices.  To which Barry responded, “Thank you for reminding me.”  And quickly added, “Thanks, Obama.”   As if this worthless piece of shit had anything whatsoever to do with the price of gas coming down.  The sad fact is that gas prices came down more in spite of Barry , than because of anything Barry might have done.   Because as we all know, he would have preferred the price for a gallon of gas to have stayed much closer to four dollars. 

Anyway, Barry later took the opportunity to “vent” about the way the state-controlled media is handling the current presidential campaign.  He ended his little rant by saying, “The time has come for me to pass the baton on but I know Hillary is going to take it and she’s going to run that race and she will finish that race and that’s why I’m with her.”  He went on to say, “That’s why I’m fired up. That’s why I’m ready to go. And I need you to join me.”   And he added, “I need you to work as hard for Hillary as you did for me. I need you to knock on doors. I need you to make phone calls.”  I was surprised he didn’t say, “vote for revenge.”

Look, the fact of the matter is all that Barry did here was to spew more of his typical nonsensical drivel.  And anyone who with a clue regarding just how screwed up things have really become in this country was likely left scratching their head after Barry said, "By so many measures, America’s stronger and more prosperous than when we started out on this journey together."  And when he went on to say, "Republicans don't like to hear good news right now. But it's important just to understand this is a big deal. More Americans are working. More have health insurance. Incomes are rising. Poverty is falling."  Because nothing could be further from the truth!

And I find it rather insulting that this pompous SOB thinks he can get away with making such blatant false claims while figures from his very own Labor Department expose him for being the liar that he is.  We now have 94 million Americans out of the labor force, the most since Jimmy Carter, and all due to his job killing and immigration policies.  If our economy was doing as great as he claims it is this election wouldn't even be a contest.  But the low info lemmings hang on his every word and would follow the compulsive liar off a cliff rather than work to educate their ignorant selves.  Is it any wonder he manages to still have a following?

But then I think we can all agree that reality and liberalism are nothing if not complete strangers.  The truth is, Barry has severely damaged the American economy, and what’s worse it was all done very much on purpose.  A record number of people are now out of the labor force, a record number are on food stamps, and a record number are now on social security disability.  Barry is the only president never to see a 3% GDP quarterly increase.  He's been so bad that it’s difficult to see us ever being able to recover.  Barry’s true legacy will be one of increasing poverty and unemployment.  And if Hitlery is elected, that legacy will surely continue.

Barry is nothing if not a self-congratulatory, delusional, poor excuse for a human being, and that’s before we even bother to take into account the fact that he has been a piss-poor president.  And there is little doubt that he will likely go down in history as being the absolute worst president ever.  Much to the relief of Jimmy Carter.  But that’s likely to matter very little to him, as he will surely make the transition into private life and become the golden boy of the lefty speaking circuit.  And as such he will continue to push the notion that it was he and he alone who was able to rescue the nation from what was a George Bush created economic apocalypse.   

Democrats have never hidden their views, or their support, for mass immigration, both legal and illegal, to the U.S.  But what they have always managed to keep at least somewhat hidden is the incredible financial cost to the American taxpayers as well as the damage it does to our country.  And they also never speak about how it robs, as well as destroys, the futures of America's children.   How is it that Democrats are permitted to continue to make the claim they are the champions of the poor and the middle class, especially Black and Latino citizens, while simultaneously serving as the instrument of their destruction?

Especially when it’s at the same time that Democrats rail on about how the system is supposedly rigged in favor of the millionaires, billionaires and big business.  But is it not the Democrats themselves who are rigging the system on behalf of those very same millionaires, billionaires and big business, by providing them with the cheap labor they seek and that is in direct competition with and to the detriment of our own citizens?  Especially the same poor and middle class folks whom the Democrats loudly claim to be the protectors of.  Talk about the blatant hypocrisy of these people.  And yet they are permitted to continue with the charade.     

Power-hungry, greedy Democrats want an expanded voter base paid for by the American taxpayers and have no problem with Americans being replaced with cheap labor and having their wages reduced while being forced to subsidize this cheap labor.  This what the future holds if we allow Democrats to increase their control over this nation.  Barry has set things in motion by simply refusing to enforce our immigration laws, and has sued to prevent those states who wish to do nothing more than what he refuses to do in order to protect their citizens.  This is just one of the dangerous trends that will continue should we decide to elect Hitlery as our next president.

BEWARE THE ‘VERY RADICAL’ MR. KAINE…

As concerns continue to mount regarding Hitlery’s rather questionable health status, and as it becomes more of a serious issue, perhaps even a show stopper as it relates to her presidential ambition, her VP pick Tim Kaine is drawing an increasing amount of scrutiny as the election draws near.  And at least some of that attention now focuses on the fact that Kaine took what’s described as being a life transforming "mission" trip to Latin America in 1980.  However, conveniently left out of all these stories, is the radical reality of the Cold War in Latin America as well as Kaine's Soviet sympathizing mentors.  In fact, whatever Kaine's intentions, it would seem that he more likely met Karl Marx than Jesus Christ while he was there.

And it’s upon digging a little deeper into Kaine's supposedly life-transforming "mission", during which he embraced the Marxist-based, heretical strategy of liberation theology, that before long we stumble across some rather interesting revelations.  For instance, it’s in relatively short order that we are able to determine that Kaine's political formation wasn't pro-American or pro-Catholic, what it was was pro-Soviet".  And as we set about in our effort to connect the dots buried within Kaine’s personal history it’s a rather alarming picture that soon emerges regarding his ‘adventures’ with radicals and revolutionaries in 1980s Latin America.  Reports indicate that while in Honduras, “Mr. Kaine embraced an interpretation of the gospel, known as liberation theology.”

It’s my understanding the Liberation Theology itself was a product of a Kremlin disinformation campaign designed to undermine the Church and bring Catholic countries into the Soviet sphere. The top-ranking Soviet Bloc defector of the Cold War, Gen. Ion Pacepa admits he was personally involved in the operation.  This wasn't mainstream “Catholic thought” at the time. It was a radical, Marxist-based ideology at odds with the Church, the pope, and the United States, but supportive of (and supported by) the Soviet Union.  To counter Vatican opposition to this theology, now published documents from the Soviet and East German archives show “active measures” were undertaken to undermine the Vatican and the pope — key barriers to a Soviet influence in Latin America.

And contrary to the myth, this was never Pope Francis' theology of choice.  According to Argentine Jesuits, he was never favorable to Marxist-tinged theology.   In 2005, he directly discussed “Liberation Theology,” “Christian socialism” and other “revolutionary” ways of thinking, saying: “After the collapse of 'real socialism,' these currents of thought were plunged into confusion. Incapable of either radical reformulation or new creativity, they survived by inertia, even if there are still some today who, anachronistically, would like to propose [them] again.”  Liberation Theology's recent second wind has been achieved by disavowing its Marxist roots.  Francis' doctrinal chief Cardinal Mueller is seen as friendly, but stated: “true liberation theology is opposed to Marxism.”

But that most certainly was not the case back in the 1980s.  And it was then that Kaine embraced not some reconstituted, post-Marxist version, but the hardcore, Cold War variety — an avowed Marxist ideology detrimental to the institutional Catholic Church and to the United States.  Just how hardcore were Kaine’s Jesuit teachers?  Well, around the time Kaine was there, Jesuits were being arrested for gunrunning, and, the very next year, the Honduran government banned any more American Jesuits from coming into that country because of their left-wing activism.  They also expelled one American-born Jesuit, who also had to leave that religious community because he was, apparently, even too radical even for them.

That priest was Father Jim Carney, and he was the one the New York Times tells us that Kaine sought out across the border in Soviet-supported Nicaragua, taking a bus and then walking several miles just to meet him.  Carney was a full-blown revolutionary.  A recent New York Times report says his death was “murky” and hardened Kaine's distrust of American involvement in the region.  What isn't so murky is what led to his death.  In 1983, Carney was part of a 96-man unit that invaded Honduras to bring the Nicaraguan Communist revolution there too.  The insurgents were Cuban and Nicaraguan trained and led by Jose Reyes Mata, Cuban-educated, and Honduras' top Marxist.  Reyes Mata had previously served with Che Guevara in Bolivia.

After a firefight with Honduran troops, Reyes Mata was captured and later killed. Carney was reported dead as well.  Some think he was captured and killed too. Kaine worried about American complicity in an extrajudicial killing, but he didn't seem all that bothered by Carney's participation in a Communist-sponsored insurgency and invasion of Honduras.  The Nicaraguan Sandinistas had been founded by KGB operative Carlos Fonseca.  Eastern Bloc archives also show that they were supported massively by the Cubans, the Soviets and the East Germans — with guns, ammunition, money, prison building, etc.  They were pretty brutal too, with more political prisoners than any other country in the region except Cuba.

Some prisoners were executed by being hacked to death, or by being flayed alive. Others had family members raped in front of them.  By every measure, the atrocities the Sandinistas committed were far worse than the dictatorship they had replaced.  What blocked them from total victory was the Reagan administration and the Catholic Church.  Why Kaine felt the need to go Nicaragua, and meet a friend of violent revolutionaries is murky at best.  But his relationship with Carney's successor, Father Melo, continues in the open.  Melo, incidentally, wants to redistribute land throughout Latin America by 2021.  Did Kaine's mentors teach him the art of Soviet disinformation — call yourself the very thing you seek to undermine and try to destroy it from within?  Just sayin’.

If that is what he's doing, does it apply just to his faith, or to his country as well?  In Virginia Kaine ran as a moderate but ruled as a liberal. Today he runs as a “Pope Francis” Catholic but on abortion and marriage, Kaine opposes Francis.  On the conscience rights of groups like the Little Sisters of the Poor, Kaine sided with Barry.  Francis sided with the Little Sisters, whom he visited in Washington a year ago to publicly show his support.  As in the 1980s, Kaine's “Catholicism” serves neither his Church nor his country, but instead a Leftist political agenda that has proven to be on the wrong side of the Church, on the wrong side of history, and against the interests of freedom and the United States.  In other words it puts him right where he feels the most at home.

So this is the man who could very well end up being just a heartbeat away from becoming president.  If that doesn’t send a chill down your spine then you must be a hardcore leftist Democrat who hates the country they’re currently living in.   So therefore it is his highly questionable past that needs to be very thoroughly scrutinized, and it’s upon doing that that one quickly realizes why it is that he was selected in the first place.  We now have on one side of this campaign two people of whom it can be said represent to our nation a very clear and present danger, and on any number of levels.  The disdain these two possess for our country should frighten every freedom loving American.  They would seek nothing more than to finish that which was begun by Barry. 

And yet it’s individuals like Jesse ‘The Extortionist’ Jackson and Al ‘Not So’ Sharpton who continue to advocate voting for Democrats because “they gonna to fix this stuff.”  Because Democrats are going to make sure that there isn't any racism anymore.  The Democrats are going to protect you from the cops. The Democrats are going to protect you from evil corporations that won't hire you. The Democrats are going protect you from the evil racists and the bigots. The Democrats are going to punish the evil racists and bigots. The Democrats are going make sure you have work.  The Democrats this, the Democrats that. You can't trust the Republicans. The Republicans don't like you. The Republicans are racists, bigots, sexists, and on and on it goes.

That’s what a large percentage of blacks in America are told.  So that's what they think. That's how they're raised.  A lot of us believe that what's holding people back is nothing more complicated than the Democrat Party.  Blacks have been voting for people who've been promising to fix things for over 50 years.  And sadly, they are just as bad off today as they were 50 years ago, if not worse off.  But they never seem to be mad at the people who are actually responsible for their continuing plight.  They're never mad at the people whose promises are never kept.  Barry has had two terms to change that, and has failed miserably.  So even after having had a black man in the White House for eight years, blacks are still worse off today than they were on Barry’s first day in office.

And I’m just not sure how many people realize, or care, how far to the left it is that today’s Democrat Party has moved.  Because it has been made to morph into what is nothing more than a Leftist-Revolutionary Party.  And most who consider themselves as proud, card-carrying members of the party are nothing but radical leftwing crazies who utterly despise America, which is why their collective platform is all about working toward the "fundamental-transformation" of it.  But the fact is that most are nothing more than "useful idiots" who are likely not the least bit aware of the leftwing doctrines supported by their party, much like those involved in religious cults don't know the deep teachings but like the perks that the cult provides to them.

At the end of the day there are now less than 60 days before those of us who still love this country will be confronted with making what will likely be one of the most important decisions we will have ever been called upon to make.  We will be choosing between a devout socialist and someone who actually loves this country.  The point of this election will be to vote for the candidate who we think most capable of changing the direction of America.  There’s an old saying that you go to war with the army you have, not the army you wish you had.  Well in 2016 we will have an election that involves the two candidates that we have, not the ones we wish we had, nor the ones that we think we should have had.  So please choose wisely!

AS THE ELECTION NEARS, THE ‘CLINTON NEWS NETWORK’ (CNN) SLIPS INTO HIGH GEAR…

With the election now being less than 60 days away it’s becoming increasingly obvious that those involved in our state-controlled media are rapidly losing what little objectivity they may have once possessed as they become little more than cheerleaders for Hitlery.  And nowhere is that more apparent than on the Clinton News Network, otherwise known as CNN.  It’s become rather difficult to determine who it is that’s more flagrant when it comes to that which is nothing more than journalistic malpractice.  I thought those in the media were in the tank for Barry in 2008 and 2012, but that pales in comparison to what’s going on this election season. 

And it was as recent as this past weekend that those who choose to watch CNN, were exposed to the rather skewed perspective typically seen from those on this network.  You see, it was on Jake Tapper’s CNN program, something called, ‘State of the Union’, that one of the panelists, Bakari Sellers, worked very hard to defend Hitlery's slandering of half of Donald Trump's supporters, referring to them as being "a basket of deplorables".  Sellers told the show’s host, that while not all Trump supporters may be bigots, they all "have to be okay with supporting” one.  But he ignored all of the evidence that would seem to paint Hitlery as being the true bigot in this race. 

Tapper, in what I’m guessing was an attempt to appear as being unbiased, proceeded to ask Sellers if he seriously thought that half of Trump's supporters are bigots, and Sellers responded by saying that polls show half of Trump's followers "believe President Obama is a Muslim informant."  I’d be curious to know which poll it might be that Seller might be referencing here.  Because I seriously doubt that there many people who genuinely think Barry is some kind of an informant.  That said, there are many who do think he is a Muslim, or at least a Muslim sympathizer.  But after having watched him for nearly eight years, how could you possibly not think that?

So this boob, Sellers, went on to say, "For many of us, this election is about beating back bigotry," and he continued to do his best to hammer home the relentless leftist accusation that opposing leftist policies is all about racism and bigotry.  But Sellers then pretended to soften his claim because of his "friends" there on the panel who support Trump.  He said, “Not all Donald Trump supporters are bigots. Not all of them, by any stretch. However, they do have to be okay with supporting a bigot.”  When was it that Trump was ever referred to as being a bigot, or a racist, before he became the Republican presidential nominee?  I would venture to guess, never.

And it was then that Tennessee Congressman Diane Black countered the drivel being spewed by Sellers, saying that what is truly "deplorable" was Hitlery's claim that half of her Trump-supporting constituency are racists.  She said she and the American people are insulted by the suggestion that if you disagree with Hillary, you are somehow a racist.  But look this is really nothing new, this is the typical crap we always hear from scumbags like this creep, Sellers.  Because it’s what these gutless wonders do every single election.  Democrats see themselves as being the defender of the little guy when really all they want to do is to squash the little guy.   

And then it was also on CNN and during an interview with Tapper’s fellow Hitlery propagandist, Chris Cuomo, that Hitlery was essentially allowed to go unchallenged when making another of her rather bizarre claims when she made the statement that her opponent, Donald Trump, is projecting what she called ‘phony strength’, not real strength.  Personally, I’m not quite sure what Hitlery might have meant by “phony strength”, but as expected Cuomo didn’t bother to press her as to what she might have meant by it.  But he did ask Hitlery what she says to Trump supporters who are compelled by his message of strong leadership.

To which Hitlery responded, “Well, there’s phony strength and there’s real strength. And it’s phony strength to not know what you’re talking about and to make outrageous statements that will actually make our job harder, no matter how in the moment it sounds. Real strength is leveling with the American people” and not encouraging the radicalization of Muslims by making “us versus them” declarations.  If, according to Hitlery, real strength is leveling with the American people, then why is it that Hitlery refuses to do so regarding her habitual lying about her emails?  And if anyone has encouraged the radicalization of Muslims, it would be Hitlery! 

But I must say that I attribute it to Hillary's rather impressive acting ability that she managed to say "real strength is leveling with the American people" with a straight face.  Especially when considering that her entire political career is based on nothing more than lying to the American people about everything from her corruption, to her diplomatic ineptitude, to her complicity in her husband's history of sexual assaults, as well as her Alinskyite agenda.  Let’s face it, there are few people in, or out of, politics who can hold a candle to either of the Clintons when it comes to their willingness to lie about almost anything.  It really is quite remarkable.

And speaking of ‘real strength’, am I the only one who views it as being a bit ironic that this statement came on the very day that Hitlery collapsed after leaving a New York 9/11 ceremony early and had to be assisted into her vehicle by several handlers.  As for the notion that recognizing and then standing up to the threat of Islamic fundamentalism actually encourages terrorist recruitment, that is such an irrational, ass-backward, unproductive strategy for winning a war that no electorate in its collective right mind should ever allow her to become Commander-in-Chief.  We must not only stand up to these religious fanatics, we might wipe them out!

Hitlery rambled on a bit before concluding her answer by stating that only hard work from patriotic Americans, not Trump's “loose talk and bombastic commentary” will hand us victory in the war on terror.  In fact, patriotic Americans know that no Democrat president will ever lead us to victory over ISIS and their ilk because willfully blind progressives are locked into what David Horowitz calls an "unholy alliance" with them. Radical leftists, like Hitlery, cannot hope to eliminate a threat that they not only refuse to recognize, but that they are actively assisting.  These Islamists and the Democrats would seem to share a common goal, the destruction of the United States!

So as things relate to Tapper’s little episode, this was really nothing more than just another pathetic example of the left doing it’s best to project their problems onto the right so people don’t see that it’s EVERY leftist and Democrat that’s a bigot!  They revel in their bigotry and beat people over the head with it in the name of "tolerance" or "multi-culturalism".  I almost had to laugh when Sellers said, "For many of us, this election is about beating back bigotry.”  I was kinda curious who he was talking about, exactly.  I mean he can’t really be talking about the “many of us” in the Democrat Party, can he?  The party of slavery, Jim Crow and segregation?   

I mean, what about all those black folks who vote for candidates for no other reason than because they’re black?   Or, Muslims who vote for Muslims simply because they are Muslims, and liberals who vote for liberals simply because they are liberals?   What about voting for the person most qualified for the job?  Let’s face it, there’s no such thing as a "bigot", when everyone is a bigot, right?  And don’t try to tell me that a very substantial number of blacks who voted for Barry didn’t do so for the very simply fact that he’s black.  And yet if I were to say that I was voting for someone simply because he, or she, is white I’m automatically assumed to be a racist. 

And you know if she’s going to be identifying Trump and his followers as bigots, what say we take a little trip down memory lane to a time not that long ago when Hitlery was known to exhibit some rather bigoted behavior.  And there were many examples during her last run for the White House.  Such as when she referred to blacks as being super predators with no conscious or empathy that we must bring to heel.  Or her attack on Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. after Barry shocked her in Iowa in 2008, when she tried to undercut his appeal by talking down the civil rights icon in favor of Lyndon Johnson, the white politician who, she said, deserved all of the real credit. 

Or when Hitlery, rather than merely attack Barry for his association with corrupt Chicago politicians, went after him in a debate for representing a “slumlord.”  The remark, perceived by Barry supporters as racist, was actually booed by the audience.  Or how it was that a desperate Hitlery staff circulated a photograph of Barry wearing Muslim garb during a trip to Somalia. Their frustration also reflected Hitlery’s explicit strategy to play up Barry’s “lack of American roots.”  Or how Hitlery cited her support from “working, hard-working Americans, white Americans” in talking up her chances of winning the general election — an explicit appeal to white voters.

Or how the day after Iowa it was hubby ‘Slick Willy’ who telephoned Teddy Kennedy and pressed him for an endorsement while making the case for his wife.  But Slick then went on, as is usually the case with the guy, belittling Barry in a manner that deeply offended Kennedy, as hard to believe as that is.  And in recounting the conversation later to a friend, Teddy fumed that Slick had said, "A few years ago, this guy would have been getting us coffee."   Oh, and let’s not forget how it was that Hitlery's mentor and "dear friend" in the Senate was KKK member and Grand Kleagle, Senator Robert Byrd – also a Democrat.  Imaging that, a Democrat in the KKK!

And then regarding Hitlery’s ‘interview’ with Cuomo,  I can only assume that the "real strength" which she and Barry have been projecting is what has now resulted in diplomats not even rolling up the stairs to Air Force One for Barry to exit the plane, whenever it is that he may show up for a visit.  It's real strength, I guess, to pay ransom to terrorist regimes as they kidnap our citizens or to allow them to harass our military free from all but the weakest form of reprisal.  And it's real strength that allows Russia to laugh in Barry's face at the negotiating table.  I think America has seen enough of that kind of real strength.  I think it’s time that we finally moved on.

DEMOCRATS’ AND THEIR BURNING DESIRE TO CHEAT…

Democrats truly are a disgusting lot.  On one hand they pride themselves on being tolerant and pro-choice and yet it’s only if you are tolerant and pro-choice when it comes to those issue which they support that prevents one from being labeled as a racist, homophobic, anti-woman or anti-Muslim.  You see we who wish to keep men out of the restroom used by our wives and daughters are the ones called bigots.  Or wish to place some level restrictions on the barbaric practice of abortion are routinely referred to as being anti-woman.  And those of us who think that it’s important for someone to prove who they say that are when casting their vote are called racists.

Which brings me to, Mr. Mark Plotkin, someone who has been described as being a Democrat strategist as well as a longtime ‘voting rights’ advocate.  Plotkin is one of those creeps who get off on claiming that Republicans simply don’t want minorities to vote, at all.  And it was in his Friday op-ed in ‘The Hill’ that this loser did his best to make just that point.  He wrote, “Let’s say it in simple English: Republicans are intent on stopping minority voters from casting ballots in this year’s presidential election.”  And added, “The GOP has had to come up with new and ‘creative’ ways to make sure that those people who don’t vote Republican will not be allowed to vote.”

Now it’s according to this boob, Plotkin, there are six ways in which the Republicans actively work against minorities: voter ID requirements, early voting hour cutbacks, the elimination of same-day registration, the requirement for voters to vote in their precinct, failure to allow those under 18 to register to vote, and closing polls on Sunday.  Personally, I’m of the opinion that it’s more than a stretch to claim that any of these ideas are aimed specifically at minorities or that the purpose of ANY of them is to prevent anyone legally able to vote, from voting.  And Plotkin also asserts that closing the polls on Sunday only started because black voters go to church on Sunday. 

Plotkin goes on to make the claim that the Republican Party is “unable and unwilling to change their philosophy or platform, they have only one alternative: to rig the system. Make sure that the polls are not open to those ‘other people’ who are not ‘our people.'”  This longtime ‘political commentator’ mentions minorities at the beginning of his op-ed, but only specifically mentions black voters, no other minority is ever mentioned in his little farcical piece.  And let’s face it, there is but one party who main focus every election is to rig the outcome.  Which party is it that always works so very hard to prevent the votes of our military members from being counted? 

But Plotkin is your typical hypocrite.  He was once the host of local radio station WTOP until he blew up at a Latino cleaning crew back in 2012.  Apparently he was let go within days of throwing a tantrum.  It seems that after trying to reach his office, he found one of the elevators was out of service, at which point he directed a verbal assault full of “swear words and nastiness, directed at a cleaning crew that just happened to find itself in Plotkin’s line of fire. As it turned out, one of the elevators was in working order.”  The cleaning crew didn’t file a complaint at the time, that came when Plotkin again verbally assaulted a cleaning crew member the next day.

Democrats always think that minorities are somehow simply too stupid to register to vote ahead of time, or are too stupid, or incapable of knowing how to go about getting an ID.  Personally if I was a member of any minority community I would view it as being rather insulting to thought of as be one of the Democrats’ perpetual children who need their collective hands held.  It's almost as if the Democrats consider them as being their pets.  And for the life of me I have never been able to figure out why blacks, and Hispanics, are not offended by the Democrat attitude and plantation mentality.  And yet, it would seem that the vast majority of both couldn’t care less.

And am I the only one who views it all as being more than just a bit strange regarding how it is that all of these items cited only affect minorities when voting.  I mean, somehow those in our minority communities manage to obtain transportation to their churches, their schools, their jobs or their welfare centers or for their medical appointments or even to grocery stores all within the hours and days that they’re open.  Why is it that only minorities seem to be affected by the rules for voting when they can find a way to do all the things I just mentioned?   And of course I’m automatically assumed to a racist for even bringing up such a thing. Right?

Personally, I’m thinking that maybe this man, Plotkin, doth perhaps protest too much. For Democrats, voter ID laws are a waste of time. You know, like security considerations on the servers of a certain Secretary of State and candidate for president.  Or concern over when a state behaves rather nefariously, as in the case of Al ‘Stuart Smalley’ Franken, by stuffing ballot boxes which were strangely later found in the trunk of a state election official’s car which handed to Franken very a close election.  Which then lead to the Democrats having a super majority and allowed them to shove down our throats that which came to be known as Obamacare.

Look, I think all of us on the right can agree that the Democrat Party has absolutely no interest in fair elections.  It’s time after time that they are caught trying manipulate the outcome.  And then you have guys like this creep Plotkin, or like Juan Williams or Jerry Rivers (Geraldo), who continually make the case that there is simply no evidence that voter fraud even exists.  Conservatives champion the notion that all who are legally able to vote, be able to vote.  But that they vote just once.  Such things simply don’t matter to Democrats, all that’s important is victory.  To them all is far in election year tactics.  Nothing is to be considered as crossing the line!

THERE’S A VERY GOOD REASON HE’S CALLED ‘MEATHEAD’…

I’m quite sure that if you’re over the age of at least 18, or maybe a bit younger, you’ll know who I’m talking about when I say, “Meathead.”  What some may not know is that the actor who played the part, Rob Reiner, was essentially doing nothing more than to play himself.  Reiner is, as was the character he played, pretty much of a hardcore lefty.  So it should come as a surprise to no one that he’s not a big supporter of Donald Trump nor, apparently, of those who support Trump.

Reiner says that it’s impossible to level with the Republican presidential nominee’s bigoted supporters, who are “mostly white males who don’t have college degrees.”   And so it was in a recent interview with ‘The Hollywood Reporter’ (THR), that Reiner said there’s “a very serious strain of racism” that runs through those supporting the Republican presidential nominee.  How often can you call someone a racist such a label becomes completely meaningless?

Anyway, Reiner went on to say, “And that’s a kind of disturbing thing, and I don’t think you ever reach those people. I think that they’re impossible to turn around. It’s very disturbing because a lot of these racist ideas have kind of been dormant for a while, and he’s given voice to them — he’s kind of unearthed it. And the thing that’s most disturbing is to discover that there’s so many people that still hold those views.”  And what views might those be exactly? 

Reiner then goes on to suggest that Trump supporters feel “threatened” by America’s racial diversity.  He said, “If it isn’t overt racism, it’s this kind of a desperate attempt at holding on to some version of America that they think was there once. They’re really threatened by our diversity, and what’s so great about the experiment of democracy is that it celebrates diversity and diversity is what makes it strong.”  What I personally feel threatened by, is our out of control government!

But this line of attack from Reiner is really nothing new for this hapless clown. The Hollywood buffoon has been bashing Trump supporters for quite some time now.  It was just last month that Reiner appeared on CNN Tonight and said the real danger in Trump’s words are that his followers “have a violent nature, and a violent streak.”  The former ‘All in the Family’ star’s disdain for Trump supporters is, however, rivaled only by his outright hatred for the White House hopeful himself.

You see, it was in an appearance on MSNBC back in July that Reiner dared to call Trump “the single most unqualified person ever to run for president in my lifetime.”  Reiner, who also told THR that the iconic character Archie Bunker would be a Trump supporter, is an enthusiastic supporter of Trump’s Democrat rival in the 2016 race.  But the actual truth of the matter is that it’s the guy now occupying the Oval Office who is the single most unqualified person to ever run for, and to win, the presidency.

Reiner went on to say, “I’ve known Hillary Clinton almost 25 years, and she’s incredibly dedicated and passionate about wanting to make things better and wanting to move thing forward.”  And he added, “She’s a real policy wonk. She can work across the aisle. She’s good at it. Once she has a job, Republicans like her because she does listen and figures out ways to forge consensus.”  No, reason any Republicans may ‘like’ her is because she supports the status quo, and so do they.

Reiner said it’s his “dream that she wins the White House,” and also admitted that “it may just be pie-in-the sky, but that’s my hope.”  I would argue that if that’s the case then it would seem to me his dream is little more than a nightmare scenario to those of us little people who still love our freedom, or what freedom we still have.  God forbid that Hitlery is ever elected, because there is every reason to believe that our country simply would never survive her.   

And when asked if there’s anything that could keep Hitlery from winning in November, Reiner said, “The only thing I could think of is some Julian Assange thing,” referencing the WikiLeaks founder, whose infamous non-profit publisher of corporate and secret government documents recently released scores of emails that embarrassed the Democratic National Committee and resulted in the resignation of former DNC Chair Debbie Wizzerman-Schultz.

The real hypocrisy here is how the ‘Left’ chides us all for being pissed off when, instead, it was the ‘Left’ who introduced us to the Communists and the Union Organizers who turned out to be KGB Agents.  It was the Left who introduced Fabian Socialism, gave us the never properly ratified 16th Amendment, took us off the Gold standard and allowed the IRS to conduct business in the Continental US.  Prior to 1933 the IRS was barred by law from conducting it's unseemly business in the USA.

Let’s face it, Reiner is really nothing more than another poor-little-rich-boy who was born with a silver spoon in his mouth.  And he, like the vast majority of those on the left, hasn't got a clue about the real world.  He'll always have a wall around his home to keep out the criminals and the illegals. Reiner is just as stupid and moronic as was the character he played on television back in the 70s.  He shed the bad wig from back in those days and has now become what is a real life 'Meathead' communist.

And I’d like to ask ‘Meathead’, since he’s so smart and all, what’s the minimum wage in Mexico?  It’s 65.1 Pesos Zone B or 70.1 Pesos Zone A, or roughly 4 bucks a day.  So I’m kind of curious when it might have been that either he or his dream candidate, Hitlery, or any other of his so-called educated friends, have ever complained to the hard leftist corrupt presidents of Mexico about raising THEIR minimum wage?   Or when have his friends in LA Rasa ever even attempted to do so?

I’m pretty sure that that would be, Never!  So he wants uneducated Americans to make $15 an hour, or 30 times the $4 they make a day in Mexico, while he lectures people in America on racism?   He might want to tend to that log in his eye, then he might more clearly see the speck in Trump’s.  The irony is Trump wants FAIR trade.  So Trump in closing the border and stopping Mexico will end the slave labor in Mexico whose corrupt leftist government will have to look to its own poor!

Part of the problem today is that the term "higher education" has, unfortunately, now been reduced to being little more than an oxymoron.  Because no longer is anything actually taught that even remotely approaches constitutional history, citizenship, literature, or any other subject, without not only a hardcore leftist slant, but a total devotion to the left.  The end result is a generation who ends up thinking just like this boob, Reiner.  And it doesn’t bode well for our country’s future.

OBAMA’S A RACIST…IT’S JUST THAT SIMPLE…

God willing, perhaps one day, in the not too distant future, we in American will come to have as our President a ‘man’ who doesn't take every available opportunity, especially while abroad, to either apologize for America or to denigrate Americans before some foreign audience.  We've have now been made to endure nearly eight long years now of Barry “Almighty” doing just that, virtually every time he travels overseas.  Never in our history have we had a president who seemed to be so ashamed of the country that he was duly elected to lead.  How sad. How very, very sad.

This time around we find our ‘Dear Beloved Leader’ in Luang Prabang, Laos, where he essentially lied to a group of young Asians at Souphanouvong University by telling them that when Americans are economically stressed, they tend to "turn on others who don’t look like them” in order to cope with their struggles.  And it was after Barry highlighted the positive aspects of America’s multicultural society such as our variety of cuisines and music and athletes for every Olympic sport, that he blamed a faltering economy for generating and exacerbating white racism against minorities.

Barry said, “That especially becomes a problem when the economy is not doing well, and so people feel stressed. Typically, when people feel stressed, they turn on others who don’t look like them.”  And he then went on to say, "When suddenly things are harder, people start saying, ‘Ah, you know what, this is the fault of the Chinese,’ or ‘This is the fault of Jews,’ or ‘This is the fault of the Houthi,’ or whatever."  Now wait a minute.  So is this an admission on the part of Barry that maybe our economy isn’t doing so hot?  But I thought our economy was humming along just fine. 

And I seem to recall how it is that Trump gets continually pummeled by just about every Democrat stooge in the state-controlled media, whenever he tells those gathered at one of his rallies that our economy is doing “horribly”.  But yet Barry’s comment about our economy not doing so well would seem to indicate that maybe Trump might just be onto something.  And it begs the question: Why is it that this hateful, anti-American racist can’t just stay on the golf course and quit embarrassing our country every time he goes overseas?  Is he like, compelled to embarrass America?

Personally, in my opinion Barry exemplifies is the quintessential “Ugly American”.  To this day, he strolls about the world misrepresenting Americans and lying to anyone who will welcome him into their country.  And what do we hear, day in and day out?  "It's all the fault of White people!"  Because somehow it’s this ‘economic stress’ that gets twisted into some silly side effect of white privilege.  Anyone who can’t see that Barry is a racist, and has been inciting racism for years, is either blind or quite stupid.  It seems he will continue to dishonor his office until the last day of his reign.

For a guy raised in the boondocks I never saw myself as being racist, and I still don’t.  Although growing up I came into contact with very few blacks.  In my high school there was only one back student in a student body of roughly 1000 students.  But I don’t recall him ever being made to experience any racial prejudice.  It wasn’t until I enlisted in the Navy that I came into contact with what I would call a significant number of blacks.  But when you’re in the military you learn, in pretty short order, that you have to rely on one another, so skin color becomes pretty much irrelevant.

As an adult, I’ve worked with many blacks and have had them as neighbors.  The interactions have always been cordial, everyday encounters.  And even when the policies of America's "first Black president", ‘Slick Willy’ Clinton upset and worried me, I didn't blame race.  Now, with Barry “Almighty”, even knowing his background, it’s still his policies I detest and the damage he inflicts that causes me to reject him.  It is not because he is half Black, it’s the fact that he’s evil that I cannot and will not overlook.  Barry's skin color is not the problem, it's his lack of character.