MORE DEMOCRATS CRAWL OUT FROM UNDER THEIR ROCK…

Anyone who believes that ANY of the many Democrats who have thus far expressed their ‘outrage’ regarding the tragedy that recently took place at a Florida high school are doing so out of their deep ‘concern’ for public safety, is, without a doubt, among the most gullible individuals to be found anywhere on the planet.  I mean the bodies weren’t even cold before we had a number of these pathetic, scum-sucking hypocritical Democrats, including ex-president Barry ‘O’, crawling out from under their collective rock and doing their best to capitalize on this tragedy.  Hell, some of these creeps were even fund raising off of it.  If that doesn’t tell you all you need to know about the modern day Democrat Party, you must be a Democrat.

Following comments made by his leftist colleagues from Connecticut just the day before, it was Democrat Bill Nelson who took to the Senate floor yesterday to take his turn at trying to score points from the high school shooting in Parkland, FL that resulted in 17 deaths and multiple injuries.  After a moment of silence, Nelson said, “At some point, we’ve got to say enough is enough. At some point we, as a society, have to come together and put a stop to this.”  It was from there that this refugee from a burn unit continued by saying, “To those who say now that it’s not the time to talk about gun violence because it’s too soon, we don’t want to politicize right after a tragedy. That’s what is said over and over. Then I would ask, when is the time?”

And it was then that this leftwing crackpot went on to ask, “How many more times do we have to do this? How many more folks have to die? When is enough going to be enough? So let’s don’t hide from it. Let’s have the conversation about this right now – not just about mental illness, and that’s part of it, not just about protection at our schools, and that’s part of it – let’s get to the root cause, let’s come together and help end this violence. Let’s talk about that 19 year old carrying an AR-15. Let’s do what needs to be done. And let’s get these assault weapons off our streets.”  I can only assume that Nelson must have been pretty confident that most of those likely to hear his idiotic rant, made from the Senate floor, were likely to be pretty stupid! 

Nelson added, “Let’s just not talk about it. Let’s do something about it. Let’s make what happened at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School a pivotal moment in this country’s history, not because it was one of the largest mass shootings – but, hopefully, because it was the last.”  But I guess what worries me is what, exactly, that old Bill might be in favor of doing.  I mean we’ve had an “assault weapons’ ban before and it accomplished absolutely nothing, evidenced by the fact that it was allowed to die.  So what is that old Bill might have in mind this time around?  Because it’s usually when you have a guy like Nelson telling you you don’t need a gun, you can pretty much guarantee that it’s time you best start looking to purchase one.   

But you know it’s just like Democrats to take full advantage of the ignorance of those who are so totally clueless when it comes to firearms by using completely bogus nomenclature whenever describing the AR-15 rifle or weapons like it.  They simply lie to the American people by calling it an assault rifle when it’s really nothing more than a semi-automatic rifle used for hunting or target shooting.  I have come to hate politicians like this creep Nelson with a passion for what they are doing to my country courtesy of the lies.  Democrat see it as appropriate to punish millions of law abiding gun owners because of the actions of one nut.  Ow about telling someone who has lost a family member to a drunk driver that liquor should now no longer be sold?

In truth, it’s progressive policies enacted into law by leftwing zealots like Nelson that are behind the breakdown, moral, social and even fiscal, of our society as well as of the disintegration of nuclear family. Incentivizing people who are incapable of caring for kids to have kids plus incentivizing men to not take responsibility for their kids and family are but the tip of the iceberg.  All of this culminates in some doughy kid shooting up a school. It's not rocket science. But to liberal Democrats looking for fake answers, I guess it is.  Once again I ask of these idiot Senators, define an ‘assault weapon.’  My definition of an assault weapon is one that can fire on full automatic and those have been banned since the 1930's.  And that’s not what was used here.

Democrats refuse to acknowledge that guns are not the problem here.  In large part this is a mental health issue and one that the bleeding heart liberals are essentially responsible for creating.  It's been a societal trend where we fail to first identify and then to treat people who exhibit extreme antisocial behavior.  Even in a case such as this where an individual has made overt threats, there appears to have no attempt to intervene either as a community or through some agency to make contact with the individual.  Don't blame the police though. Now I’m not trying to be sarcastic or trite, but until a person has broken some law there's very little that the police can do. Could the police have paid the individual a visit based on the YouTube threats, actually yes, but realistically that's as far as that would go.

Let’s face it, if politicians like Nelson were being honest they would simply come out and say what they’d really like to see happen here, which is nothing short of confiscation.  And because the only way to get those guns is to go door to door, what we’re taking about is the turning of ordinary, law abiding citizens into lawbreakers over nothing more than owning guns that were once legal.  Because there are simply way too many people with legally purchased weapons who would refuse to give them up.  And something else few on the left want to talk about is that gun laws don't matter to criminals who are already accustomed to breaking laws.  Guns will always be available.  Anybody remember Chicago during the prohibition?  

Democrats are on a mission, they have a hidden agenda the focus of which is to change the racial demographics in this country, so that they can then secure for themselves a reelection proof government.  And make no mistake, once Democrats achieve that goal, they will be in position to nationalize major corporations, repeal the Bill of Rights and force whites to pay reparations to blacks, as well as every other grieving group. Democrats also understand that once we realize that it's going to be impossible to kick them out of office by democratic means, freedom loving people will revolt. That is why they desperate to disarm us now, so that we’ll be unable to oppose them in the future.  These school shootings are just a pretense.

NOTHING BRINGS DEMOCRATS OUTTA THE WOODWORK FASTER THAN A TRAGEDY…

I think we can all agree that there is nothing that brings slimy hypocritical Democrats crawling out of the woodwork faster than a good old fashioned tragedy.  Especially one they consider as being easily exploitable in their effort to accomplish something that has long been very near and dear to their hearts.  That being, of course, their continuing effort to bring an end to the Second Amendment.  It’s already been a number of Democrats who have nearly tripped all over themselves in their rush to be the first to get to a microphone, or television camera, to express both their outrage and their supposed frustration over what they describe as being an epidemic of gun violence such as the recent shooting which took place in Parkland, Florida.

All of which brings me to one of the more despicable, unscrupulous and hypocritical members of the Democrat Party, none other than Chris Murphy, one of the senators who represents that bastion of leftwing lunacy, Connecticut.  You see, it was during a speech he gave from there on the Senate floor, and on the very same day as this terrible shooting, that Murphy demonstrated what has become the typical reaction by members of his party as he commented on the school shooting in Florida.  He claimed that Congress’ “inaction” is “responsible for a level of mass atrocity that happens in this country with zero parallel anywhere else.”  He said, “As we speak, there is a horrific scene playing out at a high school in south Florida.”

And it was from there that he went on to say, “Turn on your television right now, you’re going to see scenes of children running for their lives, what looks to be the 19th school shooting in this country, and we have not even hit March. I’m coming to the floor to talk about something else, but let me just note, once again for my colleagues, that this happens nowhere else, other than the United States of America. This epidemic of mass slaughter, this scourge of school shooting after school shooting. It only happens here, not because of coincidence, not because of bad luck, but as a consequence of our inaction.” Yup, old Chris proceeded to pull out all the stops in his effort to make as much hay as possible from the death of children.  Pretty sick!

But still he went on to say, “We are responsible for a level of mass atrocity that happens in this country with zero parallel anywhere else.”  He continued, “As a parent, it scares me to death that this body doesn’t take seriously the safety of my children, and it seems like a lot of parents in south Florida are going to be asking that same question later today. We pray for the families and for the victims. We hope for the best.”  What this guy is truly praying for is that this most recent tragedy can be portrayed as being horrific enough by him and his fellow Democrats, as well as their allies in the state-controlled media, that they will finally be able to make some measurable progress in removing guns from the hands of law abiding citizens.   

But the true insanity in all of this has to do with the fact that we continue to insist upon maintaining our public schools as “gun free’ zones.  How absolutely ludicrous is that?  And it is the very same politicians who preach to us about gun violence and who advocate for ever-stricter gun laws who stand in the way of us being allowed to protect our children.  And why do you suppose that is?  Well only one thing comes to my mind.  They’re simply using our children as bait.  We’re already finding out there were all manner of warning signs out there about this latest shooter, and yet he was still walking around.  What other explanation can there possibly be other than that certain politicians were actually hoping that something like this would happen?

You see, it’s those who strongly favor the creation of stricter gun control laws who are also the ones who remain confident that if they can only manage to get enough of our children killed then maybe it will become all that much easier for them to apply enough pressure to those evil supporters of the Second Amendment in the hope of forcing them to give up on their silly notion of being able to protect themselves and their families.  And it’s this very same leftist cast of characters, who continually go around claiming that it’s we conservatives who are the ones with blood on our hands because of our support of the National Rifle Association (NRA), who are actually the ones most responsible for tragedies such as this shooting in Florida. 

Let’s face it, there’s nothing Democrats won’t do in their quest for power and they really don’t care how many bodies pile up as a direct result of their political agenda.  Actually, the higher the body count goes the better they like it, whether we talking about gun violence, terrorism or anything else that creates an opportunity that can then be exploited to the fullest.  And we all know that their motto is, “Never let a crisis go to waste.”  However, when it comes to their drive for gun control Democrats seem quite willing to never let a dead child go to waste.  And remember the words of Democrat ‘Fast Eddie’ Rendell, when speaking about the Sandy Hook school shooting.  You know, when he said the good thing about Newtown was that it was so horrific. 

And let’s also remember that the Democrat Party is the very same political party whose members very loudly support the Black Lives Matter movement as they advocate for more cops to be assassinated.  What we have here is a very purposeful Marxist attempt to disarm Americans.  When it was made a crime to spank your kids and kids were encouraged to report being yelled at at home, or other such hanging offenses, the left essentially took away those time-tested forms of building good citizens with a sense of respect and discipline.  What we have now, for the most part, is what results from letting a village raise your kids.  Hey, here’s a nutty idea.  Instead of focusing on guns, how about we put Jesus back in our schools.

Look, we all know how Democrats seek to politicize ‘everything.’  They create a climate of hate and then blame others when shit happens.  Remember when Murphy and many of his colleagues spoke on the senate floor and expressed outrage over the number of shooting deaths in Chicago?  Neither do I!  Here we have another cynical and duplicitous ploy from the Left to distract us from their hand in desensitizing our youth to violence, misogyny and general antisocial behavior via Hollyweird, social media, pornography, vulgar lyrics, obscene "art" etc.  Perhaps the Democrats would care to tell us how many mass school shootings we had in the 50's, 60's and 70's.  What’s been the biggest change in our society since then?  Rabid Progressivism!

And just a little something on a totally unrelated issue, the upcoming midterm elections, elections upon which so much will be riding.  I think it fair to say that the forces of darkness as now working very hard to marshal their forces, possessing what is a certain level of confidence in being able to ride a wave of dissatisfaction regarding President Trump.  Now say what you will about him, but I am very confident in saying that, economically speaking, the president very much now has this country headed in the right direction.  And if we should be foolish enough to hand control of Congress back to Schumer and Pelosi, it would prove difficult for the president to keep them from heading us right back into the ditch.  So please keep that in mind.

DEMOCRAT HYPOCRISY THROUGH THE MIRACLE OF VIDEOTAPE…

I think it’s pretty safe to say that were it not for the ‘miracle’ of videotape, there would be very little chance that we would ever come to know just how corrupt, dishonest and blatantly hypocritical many of our politicians truly are.  Their penchant for lying to us, and while looking us squarely in the eye, becomes all the more clear whenever it is that we can “go to the videotape!”  I’m sure we’ve all seen the many examples of their misconduct, which, obviously, would be far too numerous to try to list here.  But we certainly shouldn’t be all that surprised anymore.   

And yet another, and most recent, example of this historical hypocrisy that has now come to light is one that originated back in 1993 when it was that a much less haggard looking Dianne Feinstein made the rather bold declaration that America could no longer afford to be Mexico’s welfare state, and that the U.S. should only accommodate legal immigrants.  And it was also back then that Ms. Feinstein acknowledged that Mexico does not provide its citizens the host of expensive entitlements available in the U.S.  But these days she sees things differently.

But it was back in 1993 that she said, “In Mexico, there is no welfare, there is no AFDC, there is no SSI, there is no Medicaid, there is no Social Security, there is no Medicare, and there is a 58 cent an hour minimum wage.”  And it was then that she was able to admit that the U.S. simply can’t afford to be Mexico’s welfare state.  She went on to say, “It is my view that, if we are going to have a North America Free Trade Agreement, that Mexico must do its share – because the day when America could be the welfare system for Mexico is gone. We simply can’t afford it.”

Feinstein said, “And, I think you’ve seen the figures, to state and local governments, of what the cost is. It’s over two billion dollars in California alone. And, I have those figures, if you want them, in specific, in my purse.”  America couldn’t even afford the then-two million illegal aliens in the country, Feinstein said 25 years ago, so the U.S. should solely focus on caring for people legally in the country.  She said, “And that's why the issue is now joined with two million illegal immigrants.”  Which kind of makes one wonder what has changed since she uttered these words.

Anyway, Feinstein then went on to say, “It's a competition for space. Whether the space is a job, the space is a home, a place in a classroom, it becomes a competition for space. This is a country that's based on immigration. And we all know that.”  She said, “And yet, at times you become so overtaxed you have to concentrate on saying, 'The people who should be here are those who come legally at this time.’”  And added, “And we've got to, for the time being, enforce our borders.”  And yet today enforcing our borders is the last thing that she wants to see happen.

Whenever a Democrat changes their position on an issue, especially an issue that can be viewed as being intensely political, we’re told that their position has somehow ‘evolved’.  Remember Barry’s views on gay marriage ‘evolved?  But when a Republican changes their position, the media always portrays them as liars.  Barry lied directly to the American people about his views on gay marriage in 2008, and then his position on the issue ‘evolved.’  Like all good Democrats their views depend upon what the various popularity polls are telling them that particular day.

Now being that it has been 25 long years since Ms. Feinstein was heard expressing her support for what can be described as commonsense immigration policy, I can’t help but wonder, now at the ripe old age of 84, if she can still remember ever uttering those words or if she has long ago forgotten that she ever did?  Because her position on the matter today is so far removed from what she was advocating for back in 1993.  But, I’m thinking the Democrat Party was in a far better place than what it finds itself in today.  Thus the need to move ever farther to the left.

It doesn’t take a genius to see that it's all about pandering for votes, playing identity politics and choosing whichever “oppressed people” that are the cause of the week.  The Democrats (and unfortunately far too many Republicans are beginning to play the same game) have no actual core beliefs anymore, it's only about what will get them the most votes in their drive to first gain and then to maintain political power as a party.  The need for term limits becomes more apparent with each new Congress.  While it wouldn’t solve all of our problems, it would certainly help.

Lastly, we do not owe anything to the Mexican/Latino people. They need to fix their own problems in their own country, not capitalize on how best to access our benefits by coming here illegally and instantly qualifying for all manner of ‘freebies’ the cost of which is left to the U.S. taxpayer to cover.  At the rate we've been going, under Barry’s “free handouts/DACA” system, America would have sunk like the Titanic in just a few years. Hopefully, we now have a president who will follow through on the promises he made to fix the massive hole in our sinking ship.

AND NOW MORE INSANITY FROM THE LAND OF THE FRUITS, THE NUTS AND THE FLAKES…

Never in my life have I witnessed a group of individuals more eager to prove just how little they know about everything, than our current batch of celebrities.  And stranger still, than the fact that they continue to present themselves as being some sort of authorities on whatever the subject may be, is the fact that they are actually accepted as such by those our state-controlled news media and even touted as being some sort of scientific experts.  This despite the fact that they have no special training, education, or insight regarding such things as so-called ‘climate change.’

Which brings me to something that I recently saw being reported on Fox News.  Apparently, actor and well-known expert on all things considered to be scientific, Bobby De Niro, already well-established as being someone who is no friend of President Donald Trump, gave a speech, for some bizarre reason, this past Sunday at the ‘World Government Summit’ in Dubai, United Arab Emirates.  And it was during this idiotic little speech that Bobby dismissed the Trump administration’s position on ‘climate change’ as “backward” and “a case of temporary insanity.”

Bobby was commenting on remarks from Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Chief Scott Pruitt, who suggested last week that there may be an upside for mankind in global warming.  It was during a recent interview that Pruitt said, “We know humans have most flourished during times of warming trends. There are assumptions made that because the climate is warming that necessarily is a bad thing.”  And he added, “Do we know what the ideal surface temperature should be in the year 2100 or year 2018? It’s fairly arrogant for us to think we know exactly what it should be in 2100.”

Bobby apparently found this attitude triggering.  He said, “I am talking about my own country, the United States of America. We don’t like to say we are a ‘backward’ country so let’s just say we are suffering from a case of temporary insanity.”  Bobby drew applause and laughter when he told the audience at the Summit that America “will eventually cure itself by voting our dangerous leader” out of office.  Actually, America will begin to cure itself regarding its strange affection for leftist insanity when we stop paying any amount of attention to pathetic old losers like Bobby.

I must say that I am more than a little curious as to why anyone in their right mind would ever waste their time listening to this guy who couldn’t even make it beyond his high school freshman year.  And despite that fact, because he's ‘Bobby’ D., he thinks that sufficient for him to lecture the rest of us on all matters scientific and that we need to heed what he says.  But the massive amount of what Bobby doesn't know is staggering. Maybe he should shut his pie hole, and stick to pretentiously method acting his way through the same movie role over and over again.

And think about it: the two loudest and most obnoxious ‘climate change’ cult celebrities in all of Hollyweird, Bobby De Niro and Lenny DiCaprio, are both high school dropouts.  Just stop for a minute and let that sink in.  Then the next thing you need to ponder is, is something that has so captivated the left, really something that the rest of us really need to be all that concerned about?  I mean, here we have two of the most clueless individuals on the planet, sounding the alarm about something that they know absolutely nothing about, and we’re supposed to take them seriously.  

And how about we all agree to just call the ‘climate change’ “Paris Accord” exactly what it is.  Another method by which the globalist progressive minded elites plan to steal more dollars from hard working, tax paying American's.  The goal here, of course, is to weaken the people while simultaneously forcing more and more of us into a greater dependence on big government.  Yes that's correct, true motivations of epic proportions all hidden behind the facade of some ominous, albeit quite bogus, catastrophe.  And they nearly got away with it, if not for Hitlery losing the election.

Now I know Bobby, has every right to remain just as clueless as he wishes to be, however he also has the obligation to be a bit better informed.  I often wonder if any of these propaganda spewing celebrities, like Bobby, actually believe any of what they say, or if it’s all just some sort of silly charade, the motive of which I’m not quite sure.  Because I’m sure that Bobby refuses to use cars and airplanes, preferring instead to bike everywhere that he goes.  As well, I'm sure he avoids such things as central heat and air. Just like all virtue-signaling, ‘green’, limousine liberals.  Right?

JEFF FLAKE, THE EPITOME OF A RINO TURNCOAT…

Well, it’s these days that it’s getting increasingly difficult when trying to determine just which of congressional RINOs represents the bigger thorn in the side of conservatives.  Most, if not all, are vocal ‘NeverTrumpers’ but more recently one of the more vocal of these folks would have to be Arizona’s junior senator, Jeff Flake, who this past Sunday made another appearance on NBC’s “Meet the Press,” during which he put forward his idiotic notion that President Trump’s claims of fake news and jokes about Democrats who did not stand for positive news at his State of the Union being treasonous gave “aid and comfort to authoritarians around the world.”  

Flake said, “I think the president stops — needs to stop calling Democrats or Republicans or others who don’t stand or applaud at every line that he has, that they are un-American. He also used that term, or treasonous. Words matter, and when he talks about fake news, for example, I gave another speech where I talked about how that gives aid and comfort to authoritarians around the world who are labeling their position or dismissing real dissent as fake news.”  And this boob went on to say, “So those things matter. I don’t think it’s a joking matter to say that somebody is treasonous and he ought to stop it.”  Spoken like a true RINO snowflake. 

Frankly I can’t wait for the day when we’re finally rid of this boob, Flake.  Last time I looked he had an approval rating of 11% and still he’s the very first guy that our state-controlled media shoves out front whenever they’re in need of a Republican willing to slam President Trump.  Flake is but one wrung above your basic dumbass liberal Democrat rooting for the collapse of America.  And it’s in that regard had the ever corrupt Hitlery been elected she would have, likely with support from Flake, finished the job begun by Barry ‘O’.  But instead it was President Trump who one and who now has got this nation up and running again by creating jobs for forgotten Americans.

And it’s RINOs like Flake, along with his mentor from Arizona and any number of other RINOs, who seem to be more than willing to side with the Democrats in preferring the rather anemic economic growth produced courtesy of those policies put forward by Barry ‘O’.  Flake and his Democrat allies seem unable to grasp that “We The People” are ready to defend this nation at all costs, and that we will go to whatever extremes we feel are necessary in our effort to do so.  Flake has been on the wrong side of everything. Just like his liberal friends. President Trump is not a fascist and he’s not the one shutting down free speech. That’s the domain of elitists like Flake.

Flake seems completely unable to allow a single day to go by without doing all that he can to fan the flames of Never-Trumpism.  And it is in so doing that this loser never came across a microphone he didn't like.  But all that he says is so toxic sounding.  Sad that this is the type of behavior that we have come to expect from far too many in the Republican Party.  No wonder a growing number of conservatives have essentially chosen to distance themselves from Republicans like Flake and have become more willing to embrace the Party of Trump.  Flake is one of the better examples of all that is wrong with the Republican Party and he needs to go away.

And speaking of ‘authoritarians’, they are the ones who tell you that you must embrace an illegal invasion, and that you must embrace any attempt to turn your city or state into a sanctuary.  Oh, and you should be willing to pay, courtesy of higher taxes, for all that’s involved in doing so.  And authoritarians tell you that you must pay for a health plan that stinks and that you can't afford, or the full force of the IRS will rain down on you.  An authoritarian can destroy evidence of wrong-doing and get off Scott-free, while you, the common peasant, would go to prison for the same offense.  Authoritarians are what we seem to have far too many of in Washington.

OUR ‘NEWS’ MEDIA HAS BECOME A PARODY OF ITSELF…

It was during a recent episode of MS(LSD)’s “MTP Daily,” that the host of this rather bizarre bit of television programming, Chuck Todd, made the peculiar statement that, at least in his opinion, the first year of President Donald Trump’s term in office, had “reached a level of crazy” that makes it feel “like we’re living inside of a parody.”  I just thought it a rather odd thing to hear coming from a guy who essentially makes his living doing what is really nothing more than a parody of a ‘news’ program and who is himself a parody of a journalist.  It was all just so strange. 

And so it was then that the esteemed Mr. Todd said, “I’m not gonna go full Howard Beale here, but it’s close.  It feels like we’ve reached a level of crazy in this White House and it’s difficult to take it anymore.  Reality TV appearances, Tabloid gossip, conspiracy theories, name-calling, vulgarities and a level of egomania few have ever seen in Washington, and that is saying something.  It’s like we’re living inside of a parody from three years ago.”  Media types like Todd keep spewing their ignorance and stupidity hoping that at some point people will start to believe it.

And he then went on to say, “Consider, ‘What would happen if Donald Trump became president?  Omarosa would probably work in the West Wing and then she’d leave to go on Big Brother to dish about administration secrets, hahaha.’  Oh, wait. That actually happened. On Big Brother, Celebrity Edition, airing tonight.”  Here’s a hint for you Chuck.  That parody that you seem to be sensing has nothing whatsoever to do with President Trump.  It’s the fake news organization you’re working for.  It’s those propagators of propaganda and regurgitaters of Democrat talking points.      

Anyway, Chuck continued, “Now let’s leave aside the fact that Omarosa made the comments on a show named after George Orwell’s dystopian surveillance state. Folks, we’re not even surprised by this anymore. Just think about what we’ve seen or endured in the last 13 months of this presidency, the Twitter battles with a rival nuclear power, members of his own party, the special council, TV hosts, a Gold Star widow, the Justice Department, mayors, senators, governors, our allies and many people in between.” Which is nothing compared to what was endured under Barry.

He said, “How about the conspiracy theories, Obama wiretapped me, I won the popular vote, Russian meddling is a hoax, the Deep State in Justice Department. And who knows maybe the Access Hollywood tape is a fake too. The immorality, racist language about immigrants from s-hole countries, defending Neo-Nazis, endorsing an accused child molester for Senate. The ego, the dear leader style Cabinet meetings, talk of the military parade, the inaugural crowd size, bragging about his election win all the time from the CIA Memorial Wall to the Boy Scout Jamboree.”

And still Chuck went on, “And how about the vulgarities, the White House communication advisor accusing another adviser of trying to perform a sex act on himself, other advisers constantly dishing about their own president, including a cabinet secretary calling him a moron. How about the cliff hangers saying tuned in next time to see what happens on NAFTA, staff shake-ups, Oval Office recordings, talking to Mueller, a government shutdown, even nuclear war. And then the tabloid fodder regarding his affair with a porn star and paying her off to keep quiet.”

Look Chuck, President Trump was duly elected.  And yet how did your friends on the left respond?  With nothing short of death threats against Electoral College members who would be voting for Trump.  Then there were all of the phony recount attempts, followed by marches and rioting.  A nightly onslaught from the media; Trump is a Russian spy, Trump is unstable, Trump is crazy, Trump is a racist and a Nazi.  Followed by talk of assassination and impeachment.  The phony election deniers who howled that Trump wouldn't accept Hitlery's win are exactly what they project.

And apparently it’s in Chuck's world that normal means being $20 Trillion in debt, as is having wide open borders considered normal, as is a sky high corporate tax rate normal and punishing businesses is considered normal.  Chuck and his ‘colleagues’ in the state-controlled media have zero credibility to any reasonably informed person, except for maybe an informed person who is on the take, Solyndra for example. As for and Trump/Russia collusion, Chuck must be the last guy on the planet to know that that was Trumped up Democrat lies, and the true collusion involved Hitlery & Co..

What we have here is Chuck showing why he’s considered one of the great morons on NBC. Trump had a first year more successful and bountiful that Reagan.  He has brought more wealth, productivity, investment and jobs back to America than anyone since Reagan.  He is getting rid of illegals that cost U.S. taxpayers $300 billion a year. He turned the military loose to do its work and defeat ISIS. The only thing not done yet is building the wall and killing off the final vestiges of Obamacare. And all this while being relentlessly attacked by the media and an unhinged Democrat Party.

You call that a parody, Chuck?  I'll give you a parody.  How about: A Moslem Marxist usurping the presidency for eight years whose only claim to fame was community organizing. How about men sodomizing men and calling it ‘love’ and ‘marriage.’ How about a 135,000 fine for Christians for refusing to bake a sad mirage cake yet liberals embrace sharia law which allows for tossing homosexuals off buildings. How about freaks in drag reading to our kindergartners but prayer at graduation being banned. How about men showering with girls.  Is that enough of a parody for ya, Chuck?

Or how about this, Chuck?  How about fines for not using the pronoun crossdressers demand.  How about Bruce Jenner being ‘Woman of the Year.’  Or Colon Kaepernick as ‘Citizen of the Year.’  How about supporting NFL crybabies using the black fist of power yet banning 9/11 memorials and Tim Tebow's kneeling in prayer. How about the kneelers ‘protests’ being based on a proven lie, “Hands up, don't shoot.”  How about the 38 Things whites need to quit ruining while blacks are given room to burn down cities.  How about a cross-dressing traitor running for senate.

How about liberals in the media claiming to be impartial. How about Hollyweird claiming to be a moral authority.  How about the communist, treasonous left fretting about a “Constitutional crisis.”  How about elected U.S. politicians “working” full-time for foreigners.  How about Clinton cash. How about FBI corruption. How about countless other treasonous, godless, degenerate, criminal policies and practices supported by the left.  Everything liberals say and do is upside down and back-asswards - including this BS from our old buddy Chuck.

Let’s be real here, it was the long eight years of Barry’s presidency that while it was less of a presidential parody, it was certainly more of a parody of a ‘crime family.’ For instance, like having our executive branch running guns into Mexico, aka Fast and Furious, using the IRS as a political weapon, Benghazi, spying on journalists, handing over billions of dollars, in cash, to Iran, and the list goes on and on.  During the entire time Barry was in office Chuck and his friends turned a blind eye to all that they knew was going on.  Now that have the nerve to continually attack President Trump.

THE CONGRESSIONAL BLACK CAUCUS, THE ‘REAL’ RACISTS…

I know I can’t be the only one shocked to find out how at least twenty-one members of that less that prestigious, and yet rather celebrated, little group of vile and disgusting racists comically referred to as the Congressional Black Caucus (CBC) are part of what can only be described as being the ‘Calypso Louie” Farrakhan Fan club.  And the group is now said to be facing some serious questions regarding their ties to the Nation of Islam chieftain as all have refused to condemn the hate group leader.

The CBC, it was recently revealed, held a secret meeting with old ‘Calypso Louie’ back in 2005 but went to great lengths to hide it from the public in order to, I guess, avoid any ‘controversy.’  Twenty-one members of the caucus today were part of the caucus at the time of this little secret meeting and all 21 have declined to denounce the old racist, Farrakhan.  And make no mistake, this supposed man of God preaches nothing but pure hate and is one of the most disgusting individuals on the plant.

In fact, the ‘Nation of Islam’ is considered so extreme that even the left-wing Southern Poverty Law Center recognizes it as a hate group, citing the group’s “theology of innate black superiority over whites and the deeply racist, anti-Semitic and anti-gay rhetoric of its leaders.”  ‘Calypso Louie’ has a long history of heaping praise on Hitler, claimed Jews are “Satantic” and has said that white people “deserve to die,” among other racist and anti-Semitic statements.  What a guy!

The 21 CBC members, aka the ‘Kill Whitey’ caucus, are, of course, all Democrats who, if you spend any amount of time listening to them, which is not something I recommend, you very quickly come to realize that not a one of them seems able to put a coherent sentence together.  Also, it’s with in this pathetic little cadre of racists that we find such high-profile Trump critics as ‘Mad Maxine’ Waters and ‘Crazy Al’ Green, who have long demanded the president’s impeachment.

Both Waters and Green are seen on tape hugging old Louie back in 2006, a year after the CBC’s ‘secret’ meeting with the hate group leader. The videos of Waters and Green resurfaced in a Wall Street Journal column following the publication of a photo of ex-president Barry ‘O’ smiling with old Louie at the 2005 meeting.   And then we have yet another veteran CBC member, Rep. Danny Davis, who not only came out and praised but actually defended ‘Calypso Louie’ in a phone interview.  

And as if that wasn’t enough, Davis then went so far as to actually describe racist old Louie as “an outstanding human being” and said “it wouldn’t be anything out of the ordinary” for him to meet with the old racist.  Davis said, “I personally know [Farrakhan], I’ve been to his home, done meetings, participated in events with him.”  I can only assume that these boys must be pretty dang tight.  Why else would Davis so enthusiastically defend a guy like Louie who is such a disgusting and vile racist?   

But Davis was far from through discussing his adoration of Louie as he went on to say, “I don’t regard Louis Farrakhan as an aberration or anything, I regard him as an outstanding human being who commands a following of individuals who are learned and articulate and he plays a big role in the lives of thousands and thousands and thousands and thousands of people.” But then this is the kind of disgusting people these slimy characters are.  They are racists of the very worst kind.

The 21 members who declined to denounce old ‘Calypso Louie’ were: John Lewis, Gregory Meeks, Danny Davis, Bobby Rush, Maxine Waters, Barbara Lee, Eleanor Holmes-Norton, Alcee Hastings, Eddie Bernice Johnson, Sanford Bishop, Bobby Scott, Bennie Thompson, Sheila Jackson Lee, Elijah Cummings, Lacy Clay, David Scott, Greg N.K. Butterfield, Emanuel Cleaver, Al Green and Gwen Moore.  Take the time to add up the collective IQ of this group and you’d barely break out of single digits.

But it is kind of refreshing to see racists finally admitting they’re racists.  These members of CBC remind blacks 24/7/365 that they're black, apparently afraid that they will somehow forget that fact if someone isn’t there to constantly remind them, working very hard to prevent that judged-not-by-the-color-of-their-skin-but-by-the-content-of-their-character mentality to ever actually take hold.  Because if that were to ever happen, blacks would have no reason to keep clinging to the Democrat Party.

AL SHARPTON AGAIN BADMOUTHS THE PRESIDENT…

I really do think that the only ones paying any amount of attention, these days, to the likes of Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson and anything they might have to say on nearly any topic, are those among us who are truly mentally deficient.  But sadly, these two sleazy characters are nothing more than the tip of a very substantial, very racist, and very black iceberg.  Because just as racist as these two race pimps is also every member of that pathetic little cadre of disgusting racists hysterically referred to as the ‘Congressional Black Caucus.’  But I digress.

Because the topic of this particular piece happens to be Sharpton who, on Tuesday’s nonsensical little episode of MSNBC’s “The Beat,” was at it yet again, this time discussing Donald Trump, Jr., because Donald Jr. had said that his father isn’t racist because “all the rappers, all his African-American friends, from Jesse Jackson or Al Sharpton, have pictures with him.”  Sharpton responded in what has become his typical fashion by ripping Trump and said he had become “one who has proposed some of the most racist, bigoted policies.”  Really?

Sharpton went on to say, “I met Donald Trump marching on him about Central Park. Later, he tried to turn Democrat and came to a few of our conventions. Then he went all the way back right with Birtherism.”  And he added, “We haven’t changed. He changed. And what he’s changed to become is one who has proposed some of the most racist, bigoted policies. When he was talking right, we took pictures with him and welcomed to him to our events. When he went left, we stood up for what was right. He is he promoting racism.”

So while there was once upon a time when Sharpton and Trump were good buddies that friendship apparently came to an end once Trump became the Republican president. Now, Sharpton has nothing but ill feelings toward his old pal.  Which, knowing Sharpton we all do, shouldn’t as all that much of a surprise to anyone.  And, you know, I find it more than a little ironic that Sharpton can be so cavalier with his throwing around accusations of racism when it’s he who is one of most racist individuals on the planet.  He defines racism.

Let’s face it, these days bigotry has become little more than a code word for whites who are less than cooperative when it comes to the prospects of being wiped out.  The left labels ALL whites as racists and white supremacists, so this message is neither personalized nor tailored.  The left uses these labels to create a rationale for the white genocide policy that they have on their mind, just like Nazis went after Jews because “they deserved it!”  Sharpton is a ‘Nation of Islam’ collaborator/ sympathizer and is an Islam apologist!  He’s a traitor.

But then, that's how it's done.  You come out and declare someone a racist. You claim the person says racist things. You claim the person has bigoted views.  You offer absolutely no proof whatsoever for your claims.  Dumb, uninformed, and low information people will either hear a sound bite or catch a glimpse of the headline, and assume you have something to back up the accusation.  These same people get on social media and repeat what they heard, taking it at face value as being truthful.  This is how you make dumb people even dumber.

These days no main stream media ever follows up with facts or examples, when interviewing liberals, not even Fox.  They just let them spew their talking points with no hard follow-up questions.  They just let Democrats call the president racist or white supremacist, never demanding examples of what policy or law it is that supposed proves their point.  Opportunity after opportunity to make clear just how phony and hypocritical those on the left truly are is continually allowed to pass by.  And they allowed to drown out anyone who disagrees with them.

So why is it that blacks hate whites with the intensity they do?  Well, because it serves their purposes and it makes the race-pimps like Sharpton lots of money. Bottom line, it’s behind all this racist bull that you find the Democrat Party revving up its base.  Making black people angry is how they win the black vote.  If blacks were honest and less angry they would see that Democrats have never really helped them. Their communities are worse off than ever, even after voting Democrat for the last 60 years. When will they wise up?  Never!

Oddly enough Sharpton is supposedly a teacher of the Bible and of God’s words.  He must have missed the warning that able-bodied people should WORK lest they not eat. Sharpton appears to be a bigot, defending the trap of welfare for his people.  He calls President Trump's work requirement in order to get welfare “racist,” while the Bible demands the same thing.  Sharpton is a con man, a racist, a charlatan, an opportunist, a liar, a race pimp and a tax cheat.  And he certainly doesn’t come across, in either deeds nor words, as a true man of God.

And I also think it fair to say that anything good for Americans is bad for the hyphenated, semi-Americans like African-Americans.  And that’s the way it should be, and will be until they finally get with the program, and stop being racist and divisive, and finally come to their senses.  We Americans can’t help them.  They need to do it themselves.  But clearly, after decades of thinking that throwing money and Obummer phones in their direction will solve the problem, they don’t want to.  So screw ‘em.  Let them continue to kill themselves off.

HITLERY CONTINUES TO WALLOW IN HER DEFEAT…

If I happened to be someone in the hierarchy of the Democrat Party, or someone described as possessing a little ‘pull’, I think I’d be having a much needed conversation with Hitlery.  And it would be during that discussion that she would be provided with two options; either she go away quietly and enjoy her remaining years in quite seclusion, or become one of those unsolved mysteries.  And the reason I say that is because it was this past Monday at Georgetown University during a panel discussion on women and human rights, that failed Democrat presidential candidate Hitlery again just could not resist bringing up her humiliating defeat by Donald Trump, once again claiming that it was a combination of misogyny caused by globalization anxiety and “old-fashioned sexism and a refusal to accept the equality of women.”

But the continuing insanity exhibited by this woman seems to know no bounds.  Because another message she seemed to think important enough to bring up, was that not only is climate change real and important, it’s also very sexist.  She said, “I would say that particularly for women, you’re absolutely right, they will bear the brunt of looking for the food, looking for the firewood, looking for the place to migrate to when all of the grass is finally gone as the desertification moves south and you have to keep moving your livestock for your crops are no longer growing, they’re burning up in the intense heat that we’re now seeing reported across North Africa, into the Middle East, and into India.”  And she added, “So yes, women once again, will be the primary…primarily burdened with the problems of climate change.”

And as I said, it was at this event that Hitlery complained of the sexism and misogyny she believed influenced Donald Trump’s 2016 campaign.  When asked about a backlash against women’s rights, Hitlery said, “I see it as a reaction that is driven by lots of different motives, some of them having to do with people feeling insecure, frightened, disappointed, discouraged—name whatever emotion you want—about their lives and the ongoing globalization of the economy, which is leaving many people out. And we haven’t seen anything yet. Wait until robotics and AI, artificial intelligence really takes off. So when people are insecure and anxious, they often defend against their own feeling by rejecting others. That often happens with minorities. It happens with ethnicities, races, religion and it also happens with respect to women.”

Hitlery continued, “Any of you who have read my book about what happened know that I think misogyny and sexism was part of that campaign. It was one of the contributing factors, and some of it was old-fashioned sexism and a refusal to accept the equality of women, and certainly the equality of women’s leadership, and some of it was an outgrowth of all this anxiety and insecurity that is playing on people and leading them in a hunt for scapegoats.”  So on and on it goes.  Hitlery refuses to accept any responsibility whatsoever for running what has to be considered as being one of the worst campaigns in recent political history.  She simply cannot bring herself to admit that she so thought she had it in the bag and could therefore simply coast on to victory.  But something funny happened on the way to inauguration day.

And with all that said, I could have sworn that MS(LSD) and the Crappy News Network (CNN) told me that the real reason Hitlery lost was because the Russians placed two nuclear submarines off each coast, one near New York the other near San Francisco, that sat just off shore on election night broadcasting mind manipulation messages to each voter: “Vote Trump. Vote Trump. Hitlery bad. Trump good” No? Oh, wait, I'm sorry, that theory is so 2017!  It was aliens!  Oh, wait, that was debunked at Christmas.  Ah, it must have been the complete disgust and distrust of Barry and Hitlery and their corrupt FBI goon squad along with the threat of four more years of open borders, amnesty, a failing economy, closing factories, jobs moving overseas, and general American decline.  That’s it, that’s why she lost to President Trump.

Hitlery will NEVER give this up, it is the lodestone of her entire existence, back to when she was a teenager.  A father who never gave her the respect she thought she deserved, a political marriage to an out-of-control womanizer, who repeatedly embarrassed her publicly, these were what set her on her way to ‘Leftist Fascism’, the only solution to her heartfelt misandry.  Even the men who obsequiously obeyed her were merely tools to assuage her megalomania.  Do not expect her to ever reflect upon herself, and the demons that would destroy her carefully constructed self-image.  The ongoing good news for America is that the hag wakes up with the reality she will never be president. This woman has lost whatever was left of her mind!  Desertification?  Women left to search for food and firewood?  Moving livestock?    

But you know, if it was me who had gotten my ass handed to me by someone I was so confident in being able to defeat, I seriously doubt that I would still be talking about it 15 months later.  I guess I don’t quite understand what it is that Hitlery thinks she has to gain by continuing to harp on the fact that she lost to guy who nearly everyone on her side thought she was going to beat and pretty handily so.  But for whatever the reason she simply refuses to let it go.  If she hasn’t by this time been able to convince enough folks that she was somehow robbed of her rightful place as president, how much longer is her whining going to go on?  And at what point are more Democrats going to start telling her enough is enough and to just give it a rest, a long rest?  But as has always been the case, it’s all about her, not about the party. 

SO HOW MUCH SMARTS DOES IT REALLY TAKE TO BE A LATE NIGHT TV HOST???

Have you ever noticed how it is with those on the left when it comes to their rather spectacular delusions of grandeur?  And how it is that they ALWAYS ‘think’ that they are just oh so much smarter than all of us common folk?  And it’s also ALWAYS that these very same mental midgets take such great pleasure in accusing anyone who dares to disagree with them of being, well, just not all that bright.   Because, you see, according to them if we were truly smart, we would all agree with them.

Which brings me to late night talk show host Jimmy Kimmel, whose anti-Trump contempt and leftist bias on the air have become almost obsessive, who recently openly confirmed what all of us conservatives already knew: he thinks we're stupid.  It was during a live event for a progressive podcast run by former Barry ‘O’ speechwriter Jon Favreau, called Pod Save America, Kimmel said, “It just so happens that almost every talk show host is a liberal and that’s because it requires a level of intelligence.”

The media elite, aka those like Kimmel, who live in their smug, self-satisfied little bubble apparently fail to realize just how laughable it is to make the claim that being a talk show host somehow requires some level of exceptional intelligence.  All it really requires is being comfortable in front of cameras and a live audience; apart from that, it involves nothing more than chatting with equally shallow celebrities and reading jokes written by one’s team of writers.  It's far from being rocket science.

Secondly, the reason all late night talk show hosts are lefties is because of the self-selecting progressive bias in Hollywood. No conservative talk show host would ever get through the door of any network besides Fox News.  And does anyone genuinely believe that any of these court jesters are intellectually superior to (or even as entertaining as) Mark Steyn, Mark Levin, Dennis Prager, Larry Elder, Andrew Klavan, or Ben Shapiro, to name just a handful of conservative media personalities?

I think we can all agree that throughout his ‘career’ Kimmel has been a pretty staunch defender of Democrats, and all manner of liberal cause.  And he regularly attacks conservatives and President Trump’s supporters on his show ‘Jimmey Kimmel Live.’  However, Kimmel is just one of the many late-night talk-show hosts known for their liberal beliefs, with other prominent figures such as Seth Meyers, Conan O’Brien, Stephen Colbert, and Jimmy Fallon regularly spewing a left-wing political sentiment.

And this wasn’t the first time that Kimmel has attacked conservatives.  He blamed gun “nuts” for the Las Vegas mass shooting in October. That same month, Kimmel said he was fine losing Republican viewers because he “probably wouldn’t want to have a conversation with them anyway.”  The late night host previously used his show to rail against Republican health care legislation.  Chuckie Schumer, it was later revealed, secretly fed Kimmel Democrat talking points to use in attacking Republicans.

I’d like to clue Jimmy in on a little something that most people pretty much already know.  An actual intelligent individual would NEVER confuse possessing “a level of intelligence” with the raw child-like emotion and preachy drivel that he treats his half-wit viewers to on national TV and on a nightly basis.  And it’s every time every time he goes on one of his little rants, be it on healthcare, gun control, or even Cecil, the lion shot dead by some dentist shot lion, two things tend to happen.

Number One is that the highly intelligent Mr. Kimmel will pull all manner of ill-informed and anecdotal gibberish from his anal orifice, if only for just a few minutes, in an effort to accomplish nothing more than to ‘fire up’ his those who comprise his equally imbecilic viewing audience.  And Number Two, Kimmel will invariably get all weepy-eyed, like a little eight-year-old-girl who just fell off her bike, while he lectures and dazzles his ‘fans’ with his self-perceived, “talk show host” intelligence.

And, Jimmy, I'm sorry to be the one to have to tell you, really I am, but your constant parroting of the Left Wing talking points of the day, that you've been spoon fed, while simultaneously not being able to control your own emotions, does not exactly scream out intelligence.  Now it may very well scream out a need for more and stronger medication, or perhaps even the need for a frontal lobotomy, but it definitely DOES NOT scream out the fact that any significant level of intelligence is possessed!

And I might add, the results of a recent study, one in which lab rats were subjected to hours of celebrity opinions on subjects ranging from foreign policy to the Constitution to human rights, showed a measurable decline in cerebral function.  This is the first known example that would seem to indicate that exposure to someone else's words can possibly lower the IQ of those exposed to those words. In layman's terms, reading or hearing the words of “celebrity” opinions may actually make you dumber!!

Silly Democrats have no substance or the intellectual ability to think for themselves. Not to mention that they are irrationally angry and easily offended by just about everything!  And it’s 99 percent of all violence, give or take a percentage point or two, that is perpetrated by those on the left. They lie incessantly, are crooked and highly ignorant of just how good they have it in this great country!  So I’ll keep my Conservative views, thank you, and continue to live my happy and wonderful life!