Satan said to the people in Paradise, “You're
missing out! I'll show you a ‘real’ paradise!” Socialism always promises better
results, but it never delivers. And like
Satan, the Socialist never admits failure, no matter how bad the results. Just
look at everywhere that it has ever been attempted, or where it continues today,
and the only result has been, or continues to be, nothing but abject
misery. And yet, Socialism continues to
be supported by those on the left in this country, while at the same time they
claim that they are not preaching Socialism, only fairness. And sadly it is many of our younger
generation who have now taken the bait.
It on Monday of this week during an interview at the 'MLK Now 2020' event that Alexandria Occasional Cortez made the claim that the
Democrat Party is a “center or center-conservative party,” and “not a left
party.” She said, “I wanted to go back
to what you said about our left party. We don’t have a left party in the United
States. The Democratic Party is not a left party. The Democratic Party is a
center or a center-conservative party. We do not advocate for — we can’t even
get a floor vote on Medicare for All, not even a floor vote, that gets voted
down. We can’t even get a vote on it. So this is not a left party.”
She went on to say, “There are left members inside
the Democratic Party that are working to try to make that shift happen.” She added, “But you’re right. It does convey
a certain sentiment about true believers. And there are a lot of true believers
in that we can capitalism our way out of poverty in the Democratic Party. If
anything, that’s probably the majority. And that’s an area in which I agree
with Dr. King that that assessment is flawed.”
It’s crazy how these supposed “centrist conservatives” continue to push,
and/or force, only those far-left policies and a highly destructive, both morally
and socially, ideology. How is that in
any way, “centrist?”
But isn’t it fair to say that Marxists always think,
or attempt to convince others to think, that Marxism as being more centrist in philosophy. The Democrat Party isn't a leftist party, what
it is is insanity on steroids, cloaked in white robes stolen from the pantheon
of Roman Gods and Emperors. We must always
beware of those who claim to be what they are not, rather than showcasing what
they represent, while denying the obvious. Make no mistake, follow a Democrat and you
will end up in a place that relegates you to the status of a slave, begging
sustenance from your masters, as the boot descends upon your neck.
If you believe this sort of drivel, then you must also
believe that unicorns are real, pigs can fly and Communism is always a great
thing for everyone. And yes, there is
such a thing as a free lunch and Democrats do love America, Americans and our
Constitution. Also, Hitlery knew nothing
about anything and the Clinton Foundation actually helped people who were not
family members or close friends. Star
Wars was based on real history and Benghazi happened because of a European
video. The IRS never targeted
Conservatives during the Barry ‘O’ years and the Bidens have not made out like
bandits. Adam Schiff is a fair minded
man and Nancy Pelosi is a good woman.
We perceive this woman as being ignorant and she is,
to us. But she is also dangerous. She is
an agitator and is someone who will always be against America. And we will likely regret it if we refuse to
take her seriously. She is much like Bernie.
She has a group of followers. We must pay attention to her, and keep an eye
on her. She will never debate, because
she cannot put a cohesive thought together, but she can agitate. Typing
epithets at her means nothing to her. We
must force her into a debate. The left
is wounded and like any feral animal they are now much more dangerous. To simply ignore her is beyond being foolish.
She is naïve, and she is dangerous because she is
naive. She is one of those true believers
in the Socialist utopia, and that makes her dangerous, because she is blind to
its faults which include having never been successful in any of the many places
in the world where it has been tried. She refuses to even entertain the thought
that it really does not coincide with human nature. It might work with ants, but not humans. She
refuses to acknowledge that it devolves into dictatorship and the very fascism
that she claims to hate. Bernie's guy
has already told us they are warming up the prisons and the re-education camps
and the gulags for those who refuse to comply.
The modern ‘left’ is all about peddling degenerate bullshit
to appeal to wealthy white liberals, who cleverly divide the white and
non-white working classes to prevent any discussion of the real economic
grievances these groups share. Cloaked
in a ‘holier-than-thou’ sense of self-righteousness, they are free to loot the
remaining working and middle class, in partnership with globalist mega-corps,
domestic institutions, and foreign governments.
This is textbook fascism. They hide behind their PC dogma to appear as
if they are doing good, while they employ slave labor overseas and have turned
the importation of slave labor into the U.S. into a civil rights issue.
They even have their
scapegoats picked out and use the ‘private’ media to promote this narrative.
Witness the coverage of the recent Virginia gun rights rally as being Exhibit
A. Communism always mimics good things
in advance to advocate the opposite, that’s how evil in the world gets started. The Democrat Party is driven by rabidly left
wing, fascist communists. They want
everyone who does not agree with them either in reeducation camps, or dead. Despite how Ms. Occasional-Cortez may choose
to describe her party, this is where the modern day Democrat Party is today. And to view it as being anything other than
what it is could prove deadly.
You can always tell when a Democrat candidate,
regardless of the office being sought, is in trouble. It’s when the only thing they have to run on
is how racist their Republican opponent is.
And it would seem that that’s the stage where the ‘Crooked Joe’ campaign
for president now officially finds itself. And that was made painfully obvious as
recently as yesterday with his comments made at a black church. And oddly it was one of Biden’s primary
contenders, Elizabeth Warren, who recently posed a very interesting question. It was when she asked, “How could the
American people want someone who lies to them?”
But that would seem to disqualify every Democrat.
Anyway, in getting back to ‘Crooked Joe,’ how is it that
I know his campaign is now in trouble?
Well, it was just this past Sunday, on the eve of Martin Luther King
day, in what was described as a ‘sermon’ given in a black church in South
Carolina that ‘Crooked Joe’ Biden went well out of his way in trying to associate
President Trump with the Ku Klux Klan (KKK).
As expected, there was absolutely no mention of how, because of
President Trump, black unemployment is now at a historic low, or of fairly
recent prison reform legislation signed by the president, only a baseless
accusation that the president somehow supports a Democrat founded organization,
the KKK.
And so, right there at the Bethlehem Baptist Church
in Columbia, in South Carolina, it was ‘Crooked Joe’ who told those in
attendance that, “We can defeat this moment of hate. … This president and his —
the Ku Klux Klans and the rest of them, they think they’ve beaten us again. But
they have no idea — we’re just coming back. God love you all.” ‘Crooked Joe’ went on to once again to repeat
the false claim that President Trump had referred to white supremacists and
neo-Nazis in Charlottesville as “very fine people” back in August 2017. ‘Crooked Joe’ claimed, “They asked the
president what he thought, and he said, ‘There are very fine people on both
sides’.”
But in fact, President Trump specifically condemned
those groups, as the transcript of his remarks, made at the event, makes very
clear. But what he actually said apparently
seems not to matter, only that he dared to say anything. President Trump praised non-violent
protesters on either side of the removal of a Confederate statue as “very fine
people,” contrasting them with violent rioters, and saying neo-Nazis and white
nationalists should be “condemned totally.”
And that the Democrats, and their many minions in the ‘fake news’ media,
continue to perpetuate this fraud in their continuing effort to unseat
President Trump, tells you all you need to know.
And it’s a partial transcript of the event back in
2017 that follows:
President
Trump: “Excuse me, they didn’t put themselves down as neo-Nazis, and you had
some very bad people in that group. But
you also had people that were very fine people on both sides. You had people in the group, excuse me, excuse
me. I saw the same picture as you
did. You had people in that group that
were there to protest the taking down of, to them, a very, very important
statue and the renaming of a park from Robert E. Lee to another name.”
Reporter: “George Washington and Robert E. Lee are
not the same.”
President
Trump: Oh no, George Washington was a slave owner. Was George Washington a slave owner? So will George Washington now lose his
status? Are we going to take down ,
excuse me. Are we going to take down,
are we going to take down statues to George Washington? How about Thomas
Jefferson? What do you think of Thomas
Jefferson? You like him? Okay,
good! Are we going to take down his
statue? He was a major slave owner. Are we going to take down his statue? You know what? It’s fine, you’re changing history, you’re
changing culture and you had people, and I’m not talking the neo-Nazis and the
white nationalists, because they should be totally condemned totally, but you
had many people in that group other than neo-Nazis and white nationalists,
okay? And the press has treated them
absolutely unfairly. Now, in the other
group also, you had some very fine people, but you also had troublemakers and
you see them come with the black outfits and with the helmets and with baseball
bats, you had a lot of bad people in the other group too.”
‘Crooked Joe’ has been trying to make a mountain out
of this same molehill since he first announced he was running, even citing for
why he was running. It was last summer when
confronted by a member of the media, regarding the fact that he seemed to be
purposely misquoting the president, that he and his campaign claimed otherwise.
And ‘Crooked Joe’ has continued to push
the “Charlottesville hoax” throughout his campaign. His Sunday sermon repeated what he has said
previously in South Carolina, but this time with a bit of an added twist. That being, an explicit link to the KKK. It’s what those like ‘Crooked Joe’ do when
they have nothing else.
‘Crooked Joe’ was introduced on Sunday by Terri
Sewell, a black member of the U.S. House, a Democrat who has also endorsed
‘Crooked Joe.’ This genius has said that
there was “no bigger threat to [Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.’s] legacy than the
person who is in the White House now.” Ms.
Sewell, by making such a patently idiotic comment made very clear whose side it
is that she’s on, and it most certainly is not on the side of the black
community. She appears to be another of
those blacks in Congress who seem quite content to do the bidding of her
Democrat masters regardless of the impact on those within her own black
community.
‘Crooked Joe’ claims to be someone who has been
involved in the civil rights movement “for real” since he was a teenager. He said, “I got my education — for real — in
the black church. And that’s not hyperbole, that’s a fact.” ‘Crooked Joe’ repeatedly referred to
ex-president Barry ‘O’, who has not yet endorsed anyone in the 2020 primary. But Sunday’s ‘sermon’ was not the first time
that ‘Crooked Joe’ has linked a political opponent to white racism, in an
effort to appeal to a black audience. During his 2012 re-election campaign, he
told a predominantly black group of voters in Virginia that Republican Mitt
Romney would “put y’all back in chains.”
But this is now all ‘Crooked Joe’ has. Because with the economy doing so well and with
record low black unemployment, the Democrats’ Plan A would now seem to be their
effort to portray Donald Trump as being the worst racist in all of human
history. And I’m sure there will be more
than a few blacks who, because of their desire for free stuff, will buy into
that nonsense. But the Democrats still
may be in danger of losing a significant percentage of blacks. Of course their Plan B, impeachment, although
hanging by a thread, continues to be talked up because Democrats can’t take credit
for either the recent trade accomplishments nor the booming economy.
What better place than a black church to try to stir
up the congregation by associating President Trump to the KKK. And yet, it’s old ‘Crooked Joe’ who very
enthusiastically supports Planned Parenthood, a rather efficient exterminator
of blacks, having murdered more blacks than the KKK, another Democrat
organization, could have ever thought possible. But this is exactly what Democrats do when
unable to run on what they’ve actually accomplished that benefits the American
People. After all, things like open
borders, bogus ‘climate change,’ or banning fossil fuels, are not exactly
winners when it comes to gaining the support of most intelligent folks.
When Trump announced at the State of the Union that
black unemployment was at an historic low, what was it that we saw from those
proud members of the Congressional Black Caucus (CBC)? Was it a standing ovation for the president? Nope, they allowed their hatred of this
president to take precedent, and sat there on their hands, stone-faced, while
everyone else in the chamber applauded and cheered. That alone tells you all you really need to
know about today’s Democrat Party. Democrats care only about gaining power, power
that will enable them to better control every aspect of Americans’ lives and to
implement its socialist/progressive and anti-Christian agenda.
Democrats keep bringing up Charlottesville over and
over again as an example of what they believe proves President Trump is a
racist. But if the president is such an
obvious racist shouldn't they be able to come up with more examples of his supposed
racism than rehashing Charlottesville ad nauseam? It’s like that movie Groundhog Day. The biggest
threat to blacks today is the election of a pro-open borders, pro-amnesty
Democrats. Getting tough on illegal immigration and holding the line on legal
immigration has been a huge benefit for low wage workers, many of whom are
black. Perhaps someone in that congregation should have asked ‘Crooked Joe’
about that.
Democrats have no plan, at least no serious plan, to
make America better and they can take no credit for anything positive that has
happened over the course of the last three years. So what’s a Democrat Party to do? Well, attack President Trump as being a
racist, attack President Trump as being a white supremacist, and attack
President Trump as being a Nazi. In
other words, attack, attack, attack. What a joke! It’s the Democrat Party that is
the party of slavery, the KKK, Jim Crow and segregation. The Democrats offer only hollow promises
while Donald Trump continues to deliver on those promises he made to the
American people.
The only place we see hate
is coming from these days is the left. They
spew it all day long, every day of the week. President Trump is called racist by the very
people who are very proud members of the political party that has a history
steeped in racism. And to simply deny
that fact or to attempt to rewrite racism out of the party’s history does not
alter the facts. It’s President Trump who
has done more for blacks in three years than Barry ‘O’ and his trusty sidekick,
‘Crooked Joe,’ did in eight. And yet
it’s Donald Trump who’s the racist? And
what did Barry and ‘Crooked Joe’ do other than to make Blacks poorer and more
dependent on government? Absolutely
NOTHING!
hy·poc·ri·sy: the practice of claiming to have moral
standards or beliefs to which one's own behavior does not conform; pretense.
So, I’m sure that most have now heard how it was
that the Government Accountability Office (GAO) came out earlier this week, on
Thursday, and issued what was an 8 page report that apparently outlined how it
was that the Trump administration broke the law when it withheld
Congress-approved aid for the Ukrainian military last year. It was according to this report that the
White House budget office violated the federal Impoundment Control Act when it
withheld $214 million in aid to Kiev, the very issue that’s the focus of the
Senate’s impeachment trial against President Trump.
And as you can well imagine it was Democrats and
‘fake news’ provocateurs everywhere who were beside themselves on Thursday when
the GAO released what was described as being a legal opinion regarding how the
White House Office of Management and Budget (OMB) had violated the ‘Impoundment
Control Act’ by withholding congressionally appropriated aid to Ukraine last
summer. The non-binding opinion was
disputed by the OMB, which released a memo last month arguing that the
“programmatic” delay sought to fulfill, not oppose, congressional intent.
The GAO decision, which had been requested by
Democrat Senator Chris van Hollen of Maryland, disagreed, concluding that the
delay had been for “policy reasons,” not “programmatic delay.” And of course it was a very sorrowful Nancy
Pelosi who was quick to cite the decision in her morning press conference, though
she had a bit of trouble, for whatever reason, when trying to pronounce the
word “impoundment.” And, of course, it
was Chuckie Schumer who likewise rushed to the nearest microphone to trumpet
the GAO decision as a vindication of the House impeachment.
Though the GAO works for Congress, it is not the
finder of fact in impeachment cases and it’s not even clear if the Impoundment
Control Act is constitutional. But with
Democrats now desperately in search of a crime that will justify impeaching the
president, anything will do. But if a
mere GAO finding is sufficient to justify impeachment, then, if we’re to follow
the same liberal logic, then ex-president Barry ‘O’ should have been impeached
at least seven times over for each of the following cases in which the GAO
found that Barry & Co. had violated federal law.
For example:
•The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and United
States Secret Service (USSS) were found to have violated section 503 of the
Consolidated Security, Disaster Assistance, and Continuing Appropriations Act,
and the Antideficiency Act, in 2009 after the Secret Service reported that it
had overspent on candidate protection in 2008 by $5,100,000, and used money
from another program to cover the shortfall. DHS failed to notify Congress 15
days in advance of the “reprogramming.”
•The Department of the Treasury was found to have
violated the Antideficiency Act in 2014 when it used the voluntary services of
four individuals. “Treasury did not appoint any of the individuals to federal
employment, nor did any individual qualify as a student who may, under certain
circumstances, perform voluntary service,” the GAO found, adding that there was
no emergency that might have justified using the individuals to perform several
months of work without receiving pay.
•The Department of Defense was found to have
violated the Department of Defense Appropriations Act of 2014 and the
Antideficiency Act in the infamous Bowe Bergdahl swap, when President Barack
Obama traded five high-level Taliban detainees for a U.S. Army deserter. The
administration transferred the five Taliban from Guantanamo Bay without
notifying relevant congressional committees 30 days in advance, as required by
law. Republicans complained; Democrats were silent.
•The Department of Housing and Urban Development was
found to have violated the Financial Services and General Government
Appropriations Act, the Consolidated and Further Continuing Appropriations Act,
and the Antideficiency Act in 2014 when the deputy secretary of the department
sent an email to “friends and colleagues” asking them to lobby the Senate in
favor of a bill appropriating money to the department, and against amendments
offered by Republican Senators.
•The Environmental Protection Agency was found to
have violated “publicity or propaganda and anti-lobbying provisions” in the
Financial Services and General Government Appropriations Act and the Department
of the Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act in 2015
by using some of the department’s social media accounts in rule-making for the
“Waters of the United States” (WOTUS) regulations (which have since been
repealed under the Trump administration).
•Two officials in the Department of Housing and
Urban Development were found in 2016 to have violated Section 713 of the
Financial Services and General Government Appropriations Act by attempting to
prevent a regional director within the agency from being interviewed by the
Committee on Oversight and Government Reform. (Notably, the GAO reversed its
earlier decision that the department’s general counsel had not violated the law
once it was presented with more evidence.)
•The Federal Maritime Commission was found to have
violated Section 711 of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, as well as the
Antideficiency Act, in 2016 when it failed to notify the relevant Senate and
House committees that it had spent more than $5,000 to furnish and redecorate
the office of its former director in 2010. (The total amount spent was $12,084
over three years, as noted by the GAO in a footnote reference to an inspector
general’s report on the excessive expenditures.)
Needless to say, Barry ‘O’ was not impeached,
and,
frankly, never even came close. But hey,
we’ve all become rather accustomed to how the rules are never applied in quite the
same manner when we’re speaking of Democrats.
The only ones expected to play by
any sort of rules are the Republicans, and what we’re seeing now is what
happens when a Republican president has the audacity to play the game in the
much the same manner as the Democrats play it. And the net result is, of course, they don’t
like it, hence the rationale for attempting to remove Donald Trump from office.
Democrats continue to do all they can to pin their crimes
on President Trump. This is just the latest limp-wristed attempt to do so, and
again we’re hearing how it’s THIS time that they finally have him right where
they want him. The Democrats keep
swinging, and because the president has committed no crime, they keep missing
because they simply can’t make something out of nothing. But, be that as it may, the House’s ‘shampeachment’
has now finally limped its way into the Senate with the claim of ‘Orange man
bad’ forming the entire basis of what is nothing but a charade.
As a bit of a side note here on this guy, van Hollen,
he’s just another bottom feeder. Another
on a long list of Democrats who are little more than left wing political hacks
and frauds who have virtually no business being in positions of power, because
they have no interest, even remotely, in trying to make our country better for
anyone but themselves. He’s one of those
who continues to put party over country and seems interested only in destroying
our country by any means necessary. It’s
politicians like van Hollen who need to be removed from office, and at our
earliest opportunity.
Any truly informed American who votes for a Democrat
in 2020 is voting FOR nothing less than the destruction of our way of life. For
all of those who think their life is so terrible they haven't seen anything
like what these radical Democrats, like van Hollen, will bring about if they
ever get in the majority. And don't fool
yourself into thinking that ‘moderate’ Democrats are anything but extinct. These
left-wingers have seized control of the Democrat Party and that's unfortunate,
and don’t believe Democrat claims about protecting the little guy, because they
only work to protect themselves.
And why is it that ANY country would EVER continue
to provide financial aid to another country that was actively engaged in
corrupt behavior with respect to the financial aid they were receiving? Why
would ANY country continue to provide aid to another country whose ‘elected’
leaders were likely syphoning much of that aid money off and putting it in
their own pockets? If the country
providing the financial aid suspected this was happening, it only makes sense
to HOLD OFF providing any additional aid until it can be determined exactly where
the money was going.
I think it worth pointing out that the ‘fakes news’
media of today long ago abandoned what was once considered to be their role as
governmental watch dog to become, instead, the propaganda arm of the Democrat Party.
Today Democrat activists pose as ‘journalists’
who, instead of reporting the ‘news,’ simply regurgitate lies fed to them by left
wing operatives hidden away deep inside the FBI, the CIA, the DOJ, the State
Department and God know where else. Everything Democrats touch they corrupt. Democrats also control our public schools that
are indoctrinating our kids.
Today our children are ‘taught’ that Socialism and Communism
is what we need to aspire to here in America, and that freedom really isn’t all
that it’s cracked up to be, and everything about capitalism makes so very clear
how it is wrong and unfair. And how,
apparently, there is nothing wrong with government theft, in the form of high
taxes, from hardworking Americans in order to provide to illegals, drug addicts
and yes criminals all manner of ‘free’ stuff. Instead of fostering a strong work ethic, patriotism,
religion and honesty, ‘teachers’ essentially preach hatred of America.
So is it any wonder,
really, that between the propaganda disguised as ‘news’ that Americans are
essentially force-fed every day and the fact that our children spend the first
18 years of life, and another 4 years if they go to college, being brainwashed,
is it any wonder that we have left wing kooks being elected to positions of power. Left wing kooks who insist that because our
current president seeks only to “Make America Great Again” that makes him
worthy of being impeached. The American
people need to get a grip, and need to work toward getting rid of those who
hate America!
As this bizarre political contest continues, the one
to determine which Democrat it is that will ultimately be chosen as the one to face
off against President Trump, it seems that with each passing day the American
people are provided with yet another obvious reason why it would be nothing
less than an act of terminal insanity for them to even consider the possibility
of voting for ANY of the current batch of Democrat candidates. And it was as recently as this past Tuesday, and
from right there on the Democrat debate stage in Des Moines, Iowa, that we were
provided with yet another reason why, if you love America, voting FOR Donald
Trump is the only sane option.
Because it was during this most recent ‘debate’ that
those tuning in, of which I was not one, got to watch how it was that all six
candidates on the Democrat debate stage vowed to put an end to America’s energy
prosperity, including the United States’ first-time status as the world’s top
producer of both oil and natural gas.
Apparently that is now something considered by those in the Democrat
Party as being strictly verboten. So I
ask you, exactly what level of insanity must be present in order for one to
consider it as being a good idea to vote for anyone who is so committed against
the American people having easy access to a reliable source of low cost energy.
It was during the debate that Amy Klobuchar claimed
she would reverse President Trump’s successful removal of regulations that
hampered domestic energy production, and that she also favors a carbon
tax. She said, “I want to hit reality
here. I serve on the agriculture committee, and I will never forget going to
Crawfordsville here in Iowa, and thank you for bringing up Iowa, Brianne, since
that is where we are. I went to this plant, and there was one worker left in
that plant. That plant had been shut down because of Donald Trump’s trade
policies and because of what he had done to those workers, with giving secret
waivers to oil companies and ruining the renewable fuel standard.”
Klobuchar also responded after a moderator asked,
“Senator Klobuchar, some of your competitors on this stage have called for an
all out ban on fracking, you haven’t, why not?”
She said, “Well, first of all, I would note that I
have a 100 percent rating from the League of Conservation Voters and that is
because I have stood tall on every issue that we have talked about up here,
when it comes to this administration, this Trump administration, trying to
reverse environmental protections. I think it is going to lead to so many
problems and one thing that hasn’t been raised by the way is the rules on
methane, which is actually one of the most environmentally dangerous hazards
that they have recently embarked on. And I would bring those rules back as well
as a number of other ones.”
And she then went on to say, “When it comes to the
issue of fracking, I actually see natural gas as a transition fuel. It’s a
transition fuel to where we get to carbon neutral. Nearly every one of us has a
plan that is very similar and that is to get to carbon neutral by 2045 to 2050,
to get to by 2030 do a 45 percent reduction. And I want to add one thing that
no one’s really answered. When we do this, we have to make sure that we make
people whole and when we put a tax on carbon, which we will do, either through
CAP and trade or through a renewable electricity standard or through a fee on
carbon.”
And then there was billionaire Tom Steyer, someone
who has made himself quite the fortune from investing in fossil fuels, but now claims
that he is apparently opposed to them. Go
figure! And it was during the debate
that he said, “Look. On the first day, I would undo Mr. Trump’s tariffs. On the
first day, I would get rid of his waivers that Senator Klobuchar was referring
to, to oil refiners not having to use corn-based ethanol.”
He was asked by a ‘moderator’: “Mr. Steyer, to
clarify, you say you’re the climate change candidate, but you made your $1.6
billion in part by investing in coal, oil, and gas. So are you the right
messenger on this topic?”
He responded by saying, “I absolutely am. Look, we
invested in every part of the economy and over 10 years ago I realized that
there was something going on that had to do with fossil fuels, that we had to
change. So I divested from fossil fuels. I took the giving pledge to give most
of my money away while I’m alive. And for 12 years, I’ve been fighting the
climate crisis. I’ve beat oil companies in terms of clean air laws. I’ve
stopped fossil fuel plants in Oxnard, California. I fought the Keystone
Pipeline. I have a history of over a decade of leading the climate fight
successfully.”
And then we have Elizabeth Warren who made it clear,
also during this debate, that now wants to end all oil and gas production on
federal lands, which is something President Trump has actually expanded:
Warren said, “Climate change threatens every living
thing on this planet and the urgency of the moment cannot be overstated. I will
do everything a president can do all by herself on the first day. I will roll
back the environmental changes that Donald Trump is putting in place. I will
stop all new drilling and mining on federal lands and offshore drilling.
That’ll help us get in the right directions. I’ll bring in the farmers. Farmers
can be part of the climate solution. We should see this though for the problem
it is. Mr. Steyer talks about it being problem number one. Understand this, we
have known about this climate crisis for decades. Back in the 1990s, we were
calling it global warming, but we knew what it was. Democrats and Republicans
back then were working together because no one wanted a problem.”
And she went on to say, “But you know what happened?
The industry came in and said, we can make big money if we keep them divided
and make no change. Priority number one has to be taking back our government
from the corruption. That is the only way we will make progress on climate, on
gun safety, on healthcare, on all of the issues.”
And it was Bernie Sanders who claimed that the world
is on fire because of fossil fuels are causing climate change, and he supports
the Green New Deal, which would end the use of fossil fuel and air travel,
among other radical economic transformations Bernie said, “Let’s be clear, if
we as a nation do not transform our energy system away from fossil fuel, not by
2050, not by 2040, but unless we lead the world right now, not easy stuff, the
planet we are leaving our kids will be uninhabitable and unhealthy.”
He went on to say, “We are seeing Australia burning.
We saw California burning. The drought here in Iowa is going to make it harder
for farmers to produce the food that we need. This is of course a national
crisis. I’ve introduced legislation to indicate it’s an actual crisis. We have
got to take on the fossil fuel industry and all of their lies and tell them
that their short term profits are not more important than the future of this
planet. That’s what the Green New Deal does. That’s what my legislation does
and that is what we have to do.”
‘Crooked Joe’ Biden defended his record of embracing
man-made climate change and cited the Barry & Co. stimulus plan that
propped up the alternative energy market. ‘Crooked Joe’ said, “My response is
back in 1986, I introduced the first climate change bill and check Politifacts,
they said it was a game changer. I’ve been fighting this for a long time. I
headed up the Recovery Act, which put more money into moving away from fossil
fuels to solar and wind energy than ever has occurred in the history of
America. Look, what we have to do is we have to act right away and the way we
act right away is immediately. If I’m elected president, I’ll reinstate all the
mileage standards that existed in our administration, which were taken down,
that’s 12 billion gallons of gasoline, barrels of gasoline to be saved
immediately.”
He said, “And with regard to those folks who in fact
are going to be victimized by what’s already happened. We should be investing
in infrastructure that raises roads, makes sure that we’re in a position where
we have … every new highway build is a green highway.” And he then went on to add, “We can create,
and this is where I agree with Tom, we can create millions of good paying jobs.
We’re the only country in the world that’s ever take great crisis and turn it
into a great opportunity. And one of the ways to do it is with farmers here in
Iowa, by making them the first group in the world to get to net-zero emissions
by paying them for planting and absorbing carbon in their fields right away.”
Pete Buttigieg is another who also opposes fossil
fuels. He said, “This issue’s personal
for me. That’s why we’re going to tackle climate from day one. It’s why we’ve
got to make sure that we have better answers than we do today.” And he went on to say, “Now, what I’ve
noticed is pretty much all of us propose that we move on from fossil fuels by
the middle of the century, starting with actions that we take right now. The
question is how are we going to make sure any of this actually gets done?
Because people have been saying the right things in these debates for literally
decades.”
And he said, “The other day in Winterset, there was
a kid at one of my events. Raised his hand, and he pointed out that he expects
to be here in his nineties, in the year 2100. He will sit in judgment over what
we do, not just what we on this stage do, anyone old enough to vote right now,
whether we actually put together the national project it will require to meet
our climate goals, to act aggressively, not just rejoining the Paris Climate
Accord. That’s table stakes, but to actually move on from the fossil-dependent
economy we live in today.”
And what is it that has these Democrats coming so
unglued? Well, it was just last October
that the Trump administration released a fact sheet on the president’s
energy-related accomplishments, including the advancement of the domestic oil
and gas industry:
1. Crude oil production reached a record high last
year and is projected to reach another record high this year.
2. In 2018, coal exports reached their highest level
in 5 years.
3. Crude oil exports reached a record average of 2
million barrels per day last year, and have averaged a record 2.8 million
barrels per day so far this year (2019).
4. The Trump Administration has approved permits for
nationally important infrastructure such as the Dakota Access and Keystone XL
pipelines.
5. President Trump has taken action to improve and
expedite the Federal permitting process for energy and other infrastructure
projects.
None of the claims made by any these Democrat presidential
wannabes makes even a lick of sense. Nothing
has happened that gives any amount of credence to what has been their continued
sounding of the alarm about what they claim to be the next great apocalypse to
be faced by man. And it’s at some point that
people must stop listening to all of the hysterics and supposed dire warnings
about bogus ‘climate change! We are
energy independent for the first time in decades, and they want nothing more
than to, once again, make us dependent upon those in the most unstable region on
the planet, the Middle East, for our energy requirements.
Look, the world runs on oil, natural gas, and coal,
and it will continue to do so well into the foreseeable future, despite all of
the wild idiotic claims made by these Democrats. We have all of it in abundance, and I believe
there is a reason for that. And yet instead
of allowing us to take full advantage of that abundance in order to prosper,
the Democrats would rather starve us of our own energy in order to protect the
planet from a ‘disaster’ that is nothing more than pure fiction. No well-intended
political party would do such a thing. They pretend to defend the planet so
they can force our nation into poverty and dependence in order to grow their political
power.
It’s now becoming abundantly clear exactly what the
Democrats want. They want a nation of
out-of-work, dependent people standing in line for their government rationed
handouts. Democrats are as un-American
as you can get, wanting to do away with our power production, all forms of
transportation, our sovereign borders, our culture, our morals, our ethics, and
our economy. Theirs is a direction that guarantees a destination where the
people have less freedom and far more rules and provides those in power greater
control. To elect any of these people is
to not only cut our own throats, but the throats of our children as well. It would be madness.
And it is also becoming very clear, or at least it
should be, that if any of these morons are actually elected president, the
Jimmy Carter years will be made to look like a boon! Let’s face it, the Democrat's position in a
nutshell is really very simply, they want, no they NEED: Every American citizen
to be unemployed and broke, powerless to change their lives for the better, and
limited to what they can say or can think by the very government they have
elected. The destruction of America as a
free and sovereign nation is now right at the very top of the Democrats’ ‘Things
To Do’ list. And a vote for any Democrat
should be considered nothing less than an act of treason!
The ONLY climate desperate
in need of being changed is, of course, the climate in Washington. And a vote
for Democrats in November, is a vote for: Higher taxes, Higher fuel costs, Higher
unemployment, millions more Americans on food stamps along with millions more Americans
on welfare, a healthcare system in shambles except for the rich, an end to our
borders, billions being spent on bogus ‘climate change,’ a level of corruption
that will make your head spin and of course stricter gun control. Let’s be real, there is not a Democrat
candidate, anywhere, running for any office, whether local, state or federal,
that is deserving of your vote.
Anyone who tuned into last night’s Democrat
Presidential Debate, in Des Moines, Iowa, was once again treated to ‘Crooked
Joe’ Biden’s rather peculiar fondness for taking specific moments from the not
so recent past, and representing them in such a manner as to make them
completely unrecognizable. And all in
what was a blatantly transparent attempt to portray himself as being far more
qualified for the job of president than is the current holder of that high
office, Donald trump. But in so doing ‘Crooked
Joe’ based most of what he said on nothing more than pure malarkey.
You see, it was during last night’s ‘debate’ that ‘Crooked
Joe’ Biden embarked on what was nothing less than yet another attempt on his
part to portray himself as something other than what we all know him to be, and
doing so by rewriting history in such a way as to portray his many disastrous foreign
policy positions in a more favorable light.
For instance, he claimed that it had been Barry & Co. that had actually
defeated ISIS. ‘Crooked Joe’ has come
under fire in recent weeks for his penchant for trying to rewrite history, but
it seems to have had very little effect.
In particular, ‘Crooked Joe’ argued that it was of
vital importance for the U.S. to cooperate with foreign nations in routing out
terrorist organizations and ensuring global stability. He said his work, as part of Barry & Co.,
included being part of the coalition that put together over 60 counties to deal
with stateless terror as well as failed states. But it’s upon closer inspection that ‘Crooked
Joe’s’ claim simply does not stand up to scrutiny. ISIS—officially the Islamic State of Iraq and
the Levant—was founded in 1999 but did not rise to significant power until the
early-2010s.
The terrorist group specifically took advantage of
the destabilized situation in Iraq and Syria during the time Barry & Co.
was in charge, to advance its numbers and territorial claims. At the group’s height, it controlled large
swaths of both Syria and Iraq. And contrary
to ‘Crooked Joe’s’ claims, it was Barry & Co. that proved to be quite inept
in fighting the terror group. And despite
the claim made by ‘Crooked Joe’, it was only after President Trump took office
in 2017 that ISIS then began to hemorrhage fighters and territory. ‘Crooked Joe’ played no part in defeating
ISIS.
And also, it was in 2019, long after Barry & Co.
had left town, that, thanks to an intensified strategy, U.S. forces not only
killed Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, the long-serving leader of ISIS, but also the
individual most likely to replace him, leaving the terrorist organization in
turmoil. So once again we have ‘Crooked
Joe’ taking certain liberties with the actual chain of events. In other words, he lied! Apparently ‘Crooked Joe’ is of the opinion
that just because those within the Democrat Party likely take what he says at
face value, the rest of us know better and fact check everything that he
says.
But still, that was far from being the only
‘attempt’ during the evening by ‘Crooked Joe’ to embellish a bit on the
supposed ‘accomplishments’ of the previous administration in what was clearly
an attempt to ‘blow his own horn.’
Because ‘Crooked Joe’ also claimed that the nuclear deal with Iran was
actually “working” before President Trump withdrew from it in May 2018. But obviously, in making such a patently
false claim ‘Crooked Joe’ made quite clear that he must have some very strange
criteria when it comes to determining if something is actually “working.”
‘Crooked Joe’ conveniently ignored the fact that the
deal essentially allowed Iran to become a nuclear power upon expiration and did
Iran ever end nuclear research. And
‘Crooked Joe’ went on the record, at the debate, declaring that if elected he
would return to the Iran deal, and even claimed that President Trump had
precipitated the current confrontation with Iran by leaving the agreement. But not only is the U.S. back in step with Israel
and the Sunni Arab world, which opposed Barry & Co’s appeasement of Iran, but
Europe also backs President Trump’s current efforts.
And ‘Crooked Joe’s’ ongoing fictional account of recent
history continued as he argued that President Trump went “into Iran” by ordering
a strike on Iran’s terror mastermind, Qasem Soleimani. ‘Crooked Joe’ said that President
Trump was wrong to order the strike, using the authorization of force granted
by Congress after the terrorist attacks of 9/11. ‘Crooked Joe’ said, “It does not give
authority to go into Iran. It gave authority to deal with these other issues.” President Trump did not send military forces
into Iran to kill Soleimani, what he did was to order an air strike.
‘Crooked Joe’ was also inaccurate when he claimed that
he had opposed the Iraq War from the very beginning. He was asked by the debate’s moderators to
expand on his foreign policy judgments, especially in light of his support for
the wars in both Iraq and Afghanistan.
‘Crooked Joe’, although admitting he regretted his vote for the Iraq
War, claimed that he only supported the conflict as a tool to convince Saddam
Hussein to allow United Nations weapons inspectors into his country. But in truth, ‘Crooked Joe’ did not oppose
the war as soon as it began. Hence
another lie!
In fact, ‘Crooked Joe’ supported the effort until
2005 when he came out against then-President George W. Bush’s handling of the
conflict, not the reasoning for the war itself.
Further evidence also disputes ‘Crooked Joe’s’ claim that he believed
the authorization vote could be used as leverage against Hussein. During a 1998 Senate Foreign Relations
Committee hearing, ‘Crooked Joe’ argued that U.N. weapons inspectors would
never succeed in Iraq while Hussein remained in power. Yet the ‘Crooked Joe’ of today seems to tell
a very different story. Odd, don’t you
think?
And it was during this same ‘debate’ that ‘Crooked
Joe’ also claimed that President Trump “weakened the sanctions” on North Korea,
an allegation contradicted by the fact that North Korea is currently under
unprecedented sanctions and the Trump administration has refused to soften
them. ‘Crooked Joe’ also stated that he
would not, as president, meet with Kim Jong-un without preconditions. He then
proceeded to claim that President Trump gave Kim “legitimacy” by meeting with
him twice, in 2018 and 2019, and that President Trump had loosened sanctions on
the country.
And his claim that President Trump “weakened the
sanctions we have against” North Korea simply is not true. The Trump administration
has not weakened sanctions and imposed new sanctions on Pyongyang as recently
as Tuesday. The U.S. Treasury Department sanctioned the Korea Namgang Trading
Corporation, a North Korean company that generates funds for the regime
overseas, and Beijing Sukbakso, a Chinese company that helps process the
profits, on the very same day ‘Crooked Joe’ claimed the administration was
weakening sanctions.
The new sanctions join those that the Trump
administration convinced the United Nations Security Council to impose on the
country in 2017, following its most recent nuclear weapon test. The
administration convinced North Korea’s closest allies, Russia and China, not to
use their veto powers to prevent unprecedentedly strict sanctions on the
regime. So the more ‘Crooked Joe’ opens
his mouth, the more we can expect him to spew nothing but lies. He seem to be under the misguided impression
that he will believed no matter how outrageous his lies are about President
Trump.
And so it is then that
‘Crooked Joe’ continues with his attempt to misrepresent, or outright lie
about, certain recent events in what would appear to be an attempt, on his
part, to portray himself as being something other than what he most definitely
is and to portray President Trump as something other than what we know him to
be. It’s sad, really, that ‘Crooked Joe’
feels that the only way he can convince Americans to vote for him is to so
blatantly lie about what President Trump has done, and continues to do, in his
continuing effort to “Make America Great Again.”
When trying to point out just how out of touch those
in our ‘entertainment’ industry really are with those of us living in the real
world, there is simply no better way to put it than in the way Ricky Gervais
did very recently, during his recent stint as host of the Golden Globe Awards. And while what he said in his remarks was
spot on, it seems to have had, as expected, very little impact, if any, on
those at whom his remarks were directed.
But then, we shouldn’t be surprised by that as these entertainers,
merely by virtue of them being able to act or sing or whatever, still see
themselves as being so much smarter than those of us who can neither act, nor
sing.
For instance, it was Mr. ‘Anger Management’ himself,
Alec Baldwin, who just this past Monday chose to once again take it upon
himself to target supporters of President Trump, this time going so far as to argue
that the “desecration of those ideals and the near moral collapse of this
country falls squarely in the lap of Trump’s supporters.” Now, personally, that would seem to be
rather odd thing to be hear from someone whom we all know to be very comfortable
at the far left end of the political spectrum as well as someone who has
virtually no problem whatsoever supporting hardcore leftist positions when it
comes to everything from abortion to illegal immigration.
It was this past Monday that Baldwin began what was
a pretty longwinded, and quite disturbing, social media rant by saying, “American
democracy has always been a struggle between the misaligned protections of
specific freedoms and a raging, at times intoxicating, 12 cylinder economy. It demanded vigilant/consistent regulation,
compassion for the disenfranchised and the periodic display of a necessary
sacrifice that allowed for the long term health of our society at the expense
of short term whims.” And so it is that
once again we have someone lecturing us on a topic that they know virtually
nothing about yet feel entitled to lecture us all just the same.
Baldwin said, “The desecration of those ideals and
the near moral collapse of this country falls squarely in the lap of Trump’s
supporters, as opposed as opposed to Trump himself, who is merely what
psychology labels the ‘objective negative function.’ He continued saying, “Like fire, floods and
earthquakes, it destroys, and only destroys, by its very nature. Without
prejudice.” He said, “It is Trump
voters, particularly those who would re-elect him who bear the blame.” And he then went on to say, “For the
undeniable and colossal destruction of everything that matters to us as
Americans that cannot be merely monetized.”
“Monetized?” He’s serious?
Most are likely familiar with Baldwin’s rather long history
of lobbing personal attacks at both the president and his supporters. It was just last July that he claimed that
“our friends in other countries” now believe that a “mass of Americans are
outright racists.” He then followed that
up roughly a month later by saying Trump supporters “have swallowed the poison
pills of racist hatred, election fraud, a revolving door of semi-competent or
outright awful appointees” because money is all they care about. And it was a few months later that Baldwin
appealed to the president’s supporters and asked them to “get rid of him,”
presumably in the 2020 election.
Baldwin ended 2019 by joining with many other rabidly
left-wing Hollyweirdos in encouraging people to take to the streets for
protests in support of the House Democrats’ bogus attempt to impeach President
Trump. Yup, these are the people who now
curiously view themselves as representing the moral compass of our society. Is
that not weird? The very same people who
so enthusiastically support the murder of children, all manner of perversion
and debauchery and the very things that most people in this country find
repugnant at best, now claim to be worried about a moral collapse? Perhaps they may want to look in the mirror to
see who’s really to blame.
To have someone on the modern left claiming to be concerned
over the “near moral collapse” of our society seems more than a bit bizarre. Especially when we have a Democrat Party that:
quite literally hates America, is very much in favor of murdering the unborn up
to, and in some instances after, the moment of birth, supports allowing illegal
immigrants to flood into our country, and who seeks to remove all mention of
God from the public square. And yet,
according to Baldwin, the blame for the “near moral collapse of our nation” is
to be laid directly at the feet of those who actually oppose all of those
things instead of where it belongs, at the feet of people like him.
And it’s the very ones who spend the most time
lecturing us on the evil of ‘our’ ways that are most responsible for some of
the worst living conditions in this the most prosperous nation on the planet. Let’s face it, it’s every time you visit any
major city in this country that is under the control of those in the Democrat
Party that you always find that there is a very high crime rate, very high
unemployment, a high level homelessness, a rampant drug problem, and tons
illegal immigrants all taking full advantage of their sanctuary status. And it’s the rest of us who are forced to pay the
high taxes required to cover the bill for what we’re told is all our fault.
Chicago is just one of the many examples of a city
being run into the ground after decades of Democrat ‘leadership.’ But it is far from the only one. A list of other stellar examples would include
such cities as Baltimore, San Francisco, Los Angeles, Philadelphia and any
number of others. And I can only assume
that those on the left, like Baldwin, must feel that if just given the
opportunity most Americans would love nothing more than to live in the same squalid
conditions as those who live in most of these very same cities. But when we make it clear that we have no
interest in doing so, somehow it’s we, and not those who have ruined our
cities, who are chastised.
Baldwin is yet another self-centered,
short-tempered, foul-mouthed, privileged jerk who now thinks himself as being
somehow qualified to sit in judgement of those who disagree with him. According
to him, the quiet, hard-working, church-going, anti-abortion majority of the
nation are to be seen as responsible for the moral decline of this country. If
it weren't so pathetic, it would be funny. He ignores completely that it’s the
Hollyweird culture that is essentially responsible for the cheapening of human
life and the loss of moral compass that has become the default setting for so
many. He has absolutely nothing to support his decree, other than his own vapid
delusions.
In truth, morality went out
the window when we started allowing babies to be killed for no other reason
than convenience, allowed bad language and pornography to become normalized and
lastly, allowed our supposed leaders to remain in elected office after having sordid
affairs with their junior employees and to then lie about it. We, as a people, have been gradually losing
our moral compass over time, and it shows in what we are expected to
condone. And it is those like Baldwin
who are far more than merely a symptom of our popular culture, he and those
like him have been prominent players in the overall degradation that has taken
place in our society.
It becomes considerably clearer, with each passing
day, just how it is that the election of Donald J. Trump, was, for the Democrats,
the worst possible thing that could have ever happened. Hence the rationale, I assume, for the
intense hatred of him. Think about it,
how much of the very shady activity that went on during the last administration
would never have seen the light of day had it been Hitlery who was elected and
not Donald Trump? And how many of the destructive
decisions made by Barry would we still be forced to deal with if Donald Trump
was not our president?
And it was just one of those disastrous decisions
that was ‘discussed’ this past Sunday on the Communist Broadcasting System
(CBS), during the broadcast of ‘Face the Nation’. It was during his appearance on the program
that ex-secretary of state, John Kerry Heinz, said the media has to “stop
dealing with questions on Donald Trump’s lies” about the Obama administration’s
Iran deal. Now Kerry-Heinz never
bothered to say, nor did host Margaret Brennan bother to ask him, what it was
that the president is supposedly lying about, merely the accusation that he’s
lying seems sufficient.
Anyway, it’s a partial transcript of the idiotic little exchange that follows:
KERRY-HEINZ:
Well, what I was really saying, I think, first of all, Margaret, you are an
expert at this. You were there. You know that the president’s tweet is a lie.
And the president tweeted this morning, because I am coming on the show and he
knew you’d ask me the question or he’d push you in a place where you did ask
the question. You and the media, I think, need to call a lie a lie. You know–
BRENNAN:
Mr. Secretary, I asked you that question in 2015 too.
KERRY-HEINZ:
–they didn’t get $150 Billion. No- no- no. But let me just finish. You know-
yes. And I’ll- I’ll answer that. I was saying clearly some money from the
budget of Iran is going to go to the IRGC. It always has. That’s no surprise.
But the truth is and President Trump- I- I- well, he probably doesn’t know
this, but the fact is his own defense intelligence agency in 2017 testified to
the Congress that very, very little money actually went to the IRGC at all.
Most of the money went to the economy of Iran, which is precisely what I said
and what we all said. So, the IRGC has never had a problem getting money. But
the fact is Donald Trump keeps saying they got $150 Billion. A lie. He keeps
saying that all of that money went to pay for it. It did not. His own defense
intelligence agency says most of the money went for the economy of the country.
So, you know, we have to stop dealing with questions on Donald Trump’s lies and
start dealing with the reality of what is going on. The fact is–
BRENNAN:
OK.
KERRY-HEINZ:
–the vast proportion of that money–
BRENNAN:
Yeah.
KERRY-HEINZ:
–went to the economy of Iran and they’re always going to be funding the IRGC.
There was no question about that.
BRENNAN:
Right.
KERRY-HEINZ:
And the IRGC budget has not gone up markedly as a result–
BRENNAN:
OK.
KERRY-HEINZ:
–of what happened with the agreement, period.
So Kerry-Heinz now seems to dispute that it was $150
Billion and that even if it was very little of it likely went to the Islamic
Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC). But
how does Kerry-Heinz define “very little?”
Let’s just say, for the sake of argument, it was $150 Billion and just 10%
of that amount went to the IRGC. That would put us at $15 Billion. Now suppose Iran was to provide that “very
little” sum of money to any of its many surrogates in the region to spread as
much death and destruction as possible.
For Kerry-Heinz to downplay that such a possibility exists is patently
dishonest.
Or, how much military hardware, available on the
black market or directly from such providers of illicit arms as Russia, China
and France, do you think such a “very little” amount could buy? I would argue enough to do Iran's bidding,
whether inside the IRGC or the Iranian Government. Can Kerry-Heinz dictate to us accurately where
each and every dollar of that $150 Billion went, and on what it was spent? Of course he can’t! As is usually the case, he hasn’t got a
clue. And for him to claim that he can
is more than a little disingenuous, it’s downright dishonest! As is typical for this guy!
Of course Kerry-Heinz is going to claim that “the
vast proportion” of whatever the amount given to Iran in return for a promise
they never kept and never intended to keep went “directly” into Iran's economy.
The fact that Iran's economy was suffering because of economic sanctions due to
their support of terrorism and their quest for nuclear weapons wasn’t
mentioned. Kerry-Heinz and Barry, like their friends in the European Union,
were doing everything they could to undermine the sanctions and appease the
Iranian mullahs so that Germany, France and others could sell to Iran.
Whether any of this money, whatever the amount was,
went to the IRGC or Iran’s national budget is completely irrelevant. Anybody with a brain knows how to make the
books look any way they want. Besides
that, Kerry-Heinz insists upon taking Iran’s word for where the money went. How freakin’ nuts is that? That this guy was ever able to worm his way into
any position of power higher than dogcatcher is what’s truly frightening, because
he possesses neither the necessary aptitude nor the intelligence. And just think, this imbecile could very well have
been our president!
Kerry-Heinz denies that it was $150 Billion but
fails to give what the ‘true’ amount might have been. His deal was an absolute farce. It didn't end the
nuclear weapons development it merely kicked the problem down the road. It failed to address the development of long
range ballistic missiles, and it couldn't even get the hostages freed. That
took even more pallets of cash. And since
Trump has been president, Kerry-Heinz has continued to illegally meddle in foreign
affairs with adversarial governments. That is a felony punishable by three
years in a federal penitentiary.
The fact is that Iran did get the $150 Billion, just
as the president said, and no one has any idea what any of that money was used
for, not even John Kerry-Heinz. What we
do know is that the only thing Iran is interested in is terrorism, and not only
there in the Middle East but all over the World. So it would only stand to reason that at
least some of that $150 Billion was used for that exact purpose and sadly we’ll
never know just how many people may have lost their lives because of it. But hey, that’s likely no big deal to
Kerry-Heinz, as that’s simply not looking at the bigger picture.
Let’s face it, John
Kerry-Heinz was no different than 90 percent of those who were members of the
same administration that he was. And the
farther we get away from what was Barry ‘O’s time in office the more it becomes
glaringly obvious how his time in office can best be described as being little
more than a crime spree than anything else, and it’s been left to hapless
clowns like John Kerry-Heinz to defend, and/or justify, all that went on during
what was a very dark period for America, fiscally, socially, internationally
and militarily. Thankfully we elected
Donald Trump.
When it comes to what has been, for decades, an
attempt by the Democrat Party to rewrite not only the history of their party,
but also the history of our country, enough is enough. Granted, the fact that our nation’s history is,
for the most part, no longer being taught in our public schools does make it much
easier for the Democrats’ to create their own version of our nation’s history. And because it’s a very rare event that their
version of history is ever challenged, it becomes accepted by many as true.
This most recent example of revisionist history
involves he who was, without a doubt, the single most incompetent, corrupt, and
dishonest individual ever to be elected president. And he was a man who made sure to surround
himself with those who equally corrupt.
And that he appointed folks like Hiterly, John Kerry-Heinz, ‘Racist’ Holder,
and so many others attest to the vast criminal network encouraged and fueled by
the historically vile criminal that we not only elected once, but twice.
And it was apparently in thinking that those folks
in a good part of the country were little more than Zombies during those very
dark years that comprised the ‘Obama Presidency,’ it was during an appearance
at ‘fake news’ HQ, aka the Communist News Network, on Friday’s broadcast of
CNN’s “Newsroom,” that ex-secretary of state John Kerry-Heinz confidently
declared that ex-president Barry ‘O’s administration “never had a whiff of
scandal.” Talk about living in some
alternate universe.
It was from the campaign trail with 2020 Democrat
hopeful, ex vice president ‘Crooked Joe,’ that Kerry-Heinz said, “I find that
Joe Biden’s breadth of experience and leadership with any number of issues from
the Violence Against Women Act to the Assault Weapons Ban to arms control
agreements, to pushing an administration to make peace it didn’t want to
initially be involved, I think those things will really ring strongly against
the other candidacies in this race. That’s why I’m here.”
Kerry-Heinz then went on to add, “I believe Joe
Biden is the only person who has the set of relationships around the world, who
has had this unbelievable breadth of experience as Chairman of the Foreign
Relations Committee and then as vice president for eight years, and an
administration, by the way, which never had a whiff of scandal.” Seriously, “never a whiff of scandal?” So I ask again, does Kerry-Heinz think that
the American people were simply not paying attention from 2009 to 2016?
“Not a whiff of scandal?” The fact that Barry ‘O’ was elected remains a
scandal! The fact that he ‘legally’ had
all of his records sealed, remains a scandal. The fact the media fawned over
his every word and Executive Action remains a scandal. The fact that the
colleges he went to, where no one remembers him as a student, remains a scandal.
Kerry-Heinz must think that by merely making
his outlandish claim the American people will all simply nod in agreement. And some very likely will.
John Kerry-Heinz, the self-aggrandizing, lying,
opportunistic, treasonous, traitorous, vainglorious, political, lickspittle
imbecile and insipid chief Obama buttlick and buffoon. The elitist, seditious
liar, appeaser and capitulator who is scared that he no longer has a chance for
the top job of president. The gutless womanizer who’s one attempt to become president
ended in classic failure. The Barry ‘O’
lapdog who will likely go down in history as being the worst secretary of state
this country ever had!
John-Kerry-Heinz, the male version of Hanoi Jane,
the rank anti-Semite who sees America being at fault for all that’s wrong with
the world. The delusional clown who’s always
for something before then being against it. John-Kerry-Heinz, the same guy who spent
a very short, but very personally rewarding time, in Vietnam. And John Kerry-Heinz, somehow now the guy that
we’re all now supposed to believe when he claims that the Obama administration
was totally without scandal.
Kerry-Heinz seems to be under the impression that
just because Barry’s corrupt DOJ chose not to investigate, or to prosecute, and
the ‘fake news’ chose not to report on what was a rather impressive list, even
for a Democrat, of scandals does not mean that those scandals never occurred. This can only work two ways. Either Kerry-Heinz
believes the American people are really stupid enough to actually believe his idiotic
claim or Kerry-Heinz is so stupid that he actually believes what he's saying.
The claim made by John Kerry-Heinz that the Obama
administration was completely devoid of scandal does not alter the fact that the
Obama administration was immersed in all manner of scandal and sub-scandal from
day one of its existence. And it’s a
list of Barry ‘O’s scandals, as well as some of his supposed ‘accomplishments,’
that many may have forgotten about, including apparently John Kerry-Heinz, that
are included, but not be limited to, those appearing on the following list:
1. Fast and Furious
2. IRS attack on conservatives
3. ‘Unmasking’ of Trump officials' names
4. The Benghazi Embassy tragedy
5. The Bowe Bergdahl saga (Trading a traitor for 5
top Terrorists)
6. Spying on journalists
7. Wiretapping the Trump campaign
8. Uranium One mine deal
9. Pallets of cash to Iran $150 Billion
10. Politicization of the State Dept.
11. Supported Muslim brotherhood in Egypt that was
eventually thrown out by its people.
12. Israel Election interference
13. Arab Spring
14. Unemployment (minorities & those who quit
searching)
15. Welfare increase (up 80% from 2008)
16. Worldwide apology tour
17. Medvedev open microphone about “having more flexibility
after the election”
And then there were the many ‘firsts’ for Barry ‘O’,
where he was the:
First President to apply for college aid as a
foreign student, then deny he was a foreigner.
First President to have a social security number
from a state he has never lived in.
First President to preside over a cut to the
credit-rating of the United States.
First President to violate the War Powers Act.
First President to be held in contempt of court for
illegally obstructing oil drilling in the Gulf of Mexico.
First President to require all Americans to purchase
a product from a third party.
First President to spend a trillion dollars on
“shovel-ready” jobs when there was no such thing as “shovel-ready” jobs.
First President to abrogate bankruptcy law to turn
over control of companies to his union supporters.
First President to by-pass Congress and implement
the Dream Act through executive fiat.
First President to order a secret amnesty program
that stopped the deportation of illegal immigrants across the U.S., including those
with criminal convictions.
First President to demand a company hand-over $20
billion to one of his political appointees.
First President to tell a CEO of a major corporation
(Chrysler) to resign.
First President to terminate America’s ability to
put a man in space.
First President to cancel the National Day of Prayer
and to say that America is no longer a Christian nation.
First President to have a law signed by an auto-pen
without being present.
First President to arbitrarily declare an existing
law unconstitutional and refuse to enforce it.
First President to threaten insurance companies if
they publicly spoke out on the reasons for their rate increases.
First President to tell a major manufacturing
company in which state it is allowed to locate a factory.
First President to file lawsuits against the states
he swore an oath to protect (AZ, WI, OH, IN).
First President to withdraw an existing coal permit
that had been properly issued years ago.
First President to actively try to bankrupt an
American industry (coal).
First President to fire an inspector general of
AmeriCorps for catching one of his friends in a corruption case.
First President to appoint 45 czars to replace
elected officials in his office.
First President to surround himself with radical
left wing anarchists.
First President to golf more than 150 separate times
in his five years in office.
First President to hide his birth, medical,
educational and travel records.
First President to win a Nobel Peace Prize for doing
NOTHING to earn it.
First President to go on multiple “global apology
tours” and concurrent “insult our friends” tours.
First President to go on over 17 lavish vacations,
in addition to date nights and Wednesday evening White House parties for his
friends paid for by the taxpayers.
First President to have 22 personal servants
(taxpayer funded) for his wife.
First President to keep a dog trainer on retainer
for $102,000 a year at taxpayer expense.
First President to fly in a personal trainer from
Chicago at least once a week at taxpayer expense.
First President to repeat the Holy Quran and tell us
the early morning call of the Azan (Islamic call to worship) is the most
beautiful sound on earth.
First President to side with a foreign nation over
one of the American 50 states (Mexico vs Arizona).
First President to tell the military men and women
that they should pay for their own private insurance because they “volunteered
to go to war and knew the consequences.”
Then he was the First President to tell the members of the military that
THEY were UNPATRIOTIC for balking at the last suggestion.
So, not a “whiff of
scandal?” Seriously? You simply can’t make this shit up. But it’s John Kerry-Heinz who has absolutely
no trouble whatsoever in making shit up.
And that he was once again able to look the American people dead in the
eye and make a claim that is so outrageously false, and with a straight face,
really tells you all you need to know about this man. And who in their right mind would ever be
willing to vote for a candidate endorsed by this lying sack of human excrement? Not me!
