Over the course of that last few years, or maybe a
bit longer, there has seemed to be an increasing number of leftwing loons who
have, for one reason or another, been able to attain the moniker of
‘professor.’ Now I can only assume that in
order for such a thing to have occurred, the bar must now be set pretty low. And in demonstrating just how low the bar has
become, we have ‘Professors’ Marc Lamont Hill and Michael Eric Dyson. Apparently these two boobs are of the opinion
that if they use all three names it will somehow make them appear to be smarter
than what they actually are. However,
unfortunately for them, it’s as soon as they open their mouth and begin to
speak that it becomes noticeably apparent, and in fairly short order, that both
are far from being terribly bright.
And as an example of why I say that there was a
recent incident that I’m sure most have now heard about where a man in a San
Antonio, Texas Whataburger stole a boy’s MAGA hat and then tossed his drink on
the group of Trump-supporting teens.
“You ain’t supporting s*it, n******,” the man told the teens after he
threw his drink on them. And it was a
couple of days later that ‘Professor’ Marc Lamont Hill, who is also a
commentator on the Communist News Network (CNN), took to Twitter taking it upon
himself to condone the attack on this 16 year-old kid. Yup, you have to be some kind of a douche bag,
which ‘Professor’ Hill most certainly is, to see the assaulting of child over something
as stupid as politics as being in any way appropriate. It makes clear the very warped mentality
possessed by those on the left.
And it was after some TMZ staffer by the name of Van
Lathan seemed to defend the man’s behavior in a Thursday tweet, writing, “Wish
I could take the high road. But your MAGA hat reads like a swastika to me” that
‘Professor’ Hill then responded with a tweet of his own of three crying
laughing emojis. ‘Professor’ Hill
claimed in a follow-up tweet on his own page that while he doesn’t “advocate throwing
drinks on people,” still suggested that wearing a MAGA hat invites assault and
that it’s hard to “feel sympathy” for the teen.
He said, “Yes, i think MAGA hats (deliberately) reflect a movement that
conjures racism, homophobia, xenophobia, etc.”
He added, “So yes, it’s a little harder to feel sympathy when someone
gets Coca Cola thrown on him.” The
‘professor’, it seems, is your typical leftist.
And it was also on Thursday, on CNN’s “New Day,” and
albeit on a somewhat slightly different topic, that Hill’s fellow leftwing ‘professor’
and CNN contributor, Michael Eric Dyson, got into a rather heated debate with
conservative commentator Scott Jennings over a Quinnipiac poll that apparently
showed that 49 percent of respondents believe that President Trump is
racist. Jennings said the poll is a
“reflection of the extreme political polarization in America right now. And he went on to say, “We are willing to
ascribe all of the worst motivations to every policy view, to every action that
our political opponents take.” And he
continued by saying, “In this case what the people who disapprove of Trump
believe he’s a racist and everything he does must be rooted in racism.”
To which the good ‘Professor’ Dyson responded by saying,
“The reality is this well, Donald Trump talks like a racist, thinks like a
racist, makes statements like a racist, conjures emotions that give support to
white nationalists. Yeah, he’s a racist. Racism is as racism does. So here’s
the problem, Martin Luther King Jr. said it’s not the white supremacists who
are the problem it’s white moderates and conservatives who are complicit by
trying to dismiss it. Brother Jennings, much respect for you but what you’re
doing is egregious because you’re attempting to make valid what are essentially
naked raw statements of racism.” I dare
say that for a black man ‘Professor’ Dyson seems to be rather ignorant
regarding what it was that Dr. Martin Luther King was all about. But I’m not
surprised.
But anyway, ‘Professor’ Dyson went on to say, “This
is easy stuff. This is very, very clear that it has racial animus here, and
you’re trying to dismiss it as a difference of opinion. That is complicit in
the racist element we’re talking about.”
Jennings responded by simply saying, “I disagree with everything you’ve
said. I disagree with the motives you’ve ascribed to me and I think most
Republicans and conservatives are tired of being or complicit in racism.” Let’s be honest here, those who do the most
to promote racism in this country are blacks like ‘Professors’ Dyson and Hill. And I find it more than just a little hypocritical
that they claim to see nothing wrong with someone being accused of racism for nothing
more than wearing a hat, and yet they can spew all manner racist drivel and
it’s ok.
Dyson said, “That a man making inflammatory remarks
is not something to just be disagreed with. You should repudiate them and find
cause to distance yourself from a man who can call all Mexicans rapists,
Muslims who should be banned, black people who should be discriminated against,
women who should be treated in a sexually predatory manner. The point is that
here is a president who said things quite clearly and you as a figure can’t
even say ‘Yes I find it reprehensible and he should be repudiated’ And yet you
come on to say ‘I disagree with you in the past.’ That’s part of the problem
we’re confronting here in America. Until white folk like you can stand up and
find your spine, you will continue to be complicit in the racist animus of this
country.” “The racist animus of this
country?” Seriously?
Let’s be honest here, if anyone is being complicit
here it’s racist boobs like Dyson and Hill who I’m quite sure would never agree
that the vast majority of racists in this country happen to be black. Racism still exists in this country because
of people exactly like them. Now I’m not
saying that there are not racist white folks, because there are. But there are far more blacks who are racist
than whites, and they seem to base that racism on a practice the ended more
than 150 years ago. And I can’t help but
wonder if either of our illustrious ‘professors’ ever found anything that was
said by their hero Barry ‘O’ to be either reprehensible or something for which they
felt he should have been repudiated.’
Call me silly, but somehow I doubt it.
Because that is how those on the left operate.
And I would argue that it’s racist black folk like
Dyson, as well as Hill, who are the ones in rather desperate need of finding a
spine, and maybe a little honesty as well.
They need to work up the necessary courage that would allow them to
finally walk off the Democrat plantation, and to encourage as many others as
they can to do the same. The sad truth
here is that these guys are nothing more than willing accomplices of the
Democrat Party in its continuing effort to make sure blacks in this country are
kept from straying. They are little more
than traitors to their race. And they
seem to be very comfortable in their role as racial overseers for the Democrat
Party. They are little more than ‘Al
Sharptons’ of the academic world. And as
long as people like them are listened to very little will change.
But I do have a question for these black ‘professors,’ and all of the others like them. If I’m such a racist for having voted for President Trump, and for intending to do so again in 2020, then what about the millions of blacks who voted for Barry ‘O’ for no other reason than because he was black? Because to me that’s far more of an act of overt racism than is my simply choosing to vote for President Trump because of his positions on those issues that are most important to me. And speaking of Barry ‘O’, the fact that he is black had nothing whatsoever to do with my reasons for not voting for him or for not supporting him as president. That was because he was, and remains to this day, a devout socialist who hates the country that I love. Just like our two previously mentioned supposed ‘professors.’
But I do have a question for these black ‘professors,’ and all of the others like them. If I’m such a racist for having voted for President Trump, and for intending to do so again in 2020, then what about the millions of blacks who voted for Barry ‘O’ for no other reason than because he was black? Because to me that’s far more of an act of overt racism than is my simply choosing to vote for President Trump because of his positions on those issues that are most important to me. And speaking of Barry ‘O’, the fact that he is black had nothing whatsoever to do with my reasons for not voting for him or for not supporting him as president. That was because he was, and remains to this day, a devout socialist who hates the country that I love. Just like our two previously mentioned supposed ‘professors.’
No comments:
Post a Comment