EXTREMISM IN AMERICA IS BROUGHT TO YOU BY…THE DEMOCRAT PARTY…

So riddle me this…Which party is it that is to be considered as being the more extreme?  Now if you’re a regular viewer of our ‘fake news’ media, or a Democrat, the answer to that question would likely be seen as a no brainer.  Why it’s the Republican Party, of course!  You know, the same party that supports the right of EVERY American citizen to defend themselves, that favors keeping the government small opposes governmental intrusion into the lives of American citizens, the party that seeks to place reasonable limits on abortion, that supports allowing the American people to keep more of the money they work so hard for, that supports the actual securing of our southern border, and generally favors prosperity for ALL.

Now keep in mind that it is all of the above that have been deemed by both those in the media and in the Democrat Party as being far more extreme, even radical, than the party that supports allowing abortion all the way up to the point of delivery, the party that approves the withholding healthcare from a fully developed child outside the womb if the mother didn’t ‘want’ the baby, the party that thinks it’s just fine for men to use the same restrooms as women, and even for men to complete against women in sports, the party that says that you have absolutely NO right to defend yourself and the party who wants to do away, completely, with our southern border and to allow ANYONE who might want to come here, entrance into this country.

And it’s on the topic of abortion that the Democrat Party has now become the most extreme, even fanatical.  Keep in mind, here, that very few countries in the world allow abortion after twenty weeks, yet in the U.S. people who support such limitations are described as “extreme.”  A significant majority of Americans are against late term abortions, and yet not one Democrat now running for president has taken a stand against late term abortions. If they said that, they might be labeled as being against reproductive ‘rights.’  Democrats say they believe that everyone has a right to health care, but some obviously don’t believe it because they are willing to withhold health care from the most vulnerable, a child that has just been delivered.

We know that Democrats are more than willing to withhold health care from people who they deem as being unworthy, based on what then president Barry ‘O’ said to a woman at a town hall meeting when he was busy out lobbying for Obamacare. This particular woman asked if her 100-year-old mother could get a pacemaker if her doctor agreed that she had great zeal.  Barry essentially said the 100-year-old had lived long enough and maybe she should just take a pill. Obviously, Barry didn’t give a damn about what the woman or her doctor thought. In his thought process it was up to government to decide. Why don’t our faux journalists stop pretending that they favor people choose, when they actually favor the government doing the choosing?

We also know that under Obamacare, which was passed 100% by Democrats, hospitals received bonuses if they didn’t readmit as many patients. Again, the government, not the patient or the doctor, were controlling the decision. We were all told that health care would greatly improve for all if Obamacare was passed yet life expectancy went down unexpectedly starting in 2015 for three straight years. And could the Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program and a president and his advisors who determined that people may have lived long enough, be equated to a death panel?  Nothing Democrats say gives people freedom of choice and control of their own health care.  Democrats have long favored that the government be in charge of such decisions.

And which party is it that we can actually say is racist?  Would that be the party that wants more minority women to have their babies or the party that wants to continue to abort minority children at a much higher rate than their percent of the population? Democrats love to describe themselves as being the party of science, but if that’s so then why do they so adamantly refuse to admit that the only date a human life can begin is at conception?  And I am still a little confused about why Democrats call themselves progressives?  Perhaps it would be more fitting to call themselves the regressive party since it’s as science gets better and children are better able to survive after early childbirth, they lengthen the time to be eligible for abortion.

So you tell me, which party can we now safely say is the party of extremism in America?  

As I said in the beginning, this should be very much of a no-brainer.  It is a Democrat Party that has now moved so far to the left and has become so fanatical in its quest for political power as to make itself completely unrecognizable from its former self.  With the election of Donald Trump the Democrats seem to have lost their collective mind.  Where they once worked very hard to keep their radical agenda a bit closer to the vest, these days Democrats seem almost compelled to ‘let it all hang out’ regardless of the, at least potential, consequences.  Where it was once easier for them to dodge the ‘extreme’ label, today that is no longer possible.

PELOSI: THE DEMOCRATS HAVE NEVER SAID WE DON’T HAVE A CRISIS AT THE BORDER…

I can only assume that Nancy Pelosi must think that ALL Americans are as stupid as those who continue to vote for Democrats.  But here’s a news flash, Nancy, we’re not.  So when she makes the idiotic claim that she and her fellow Democrats have never, not even once, argued that we do not have a crisis at our southern border it’s no one but the most brain dead among us who believe her.  Because it’s been on more than one occasion that she and many of her fellow Democrats have done exactly that.

It was earlier this week during her weekly press conference that Pelosi actually claimed that Democrats have “never not” called the situation at our southern border a crisis, this despite the fact that they repeated did just that earlier this year.  She said, “Well, let me just say this. We have never not said that there was a crisis — there is a humanitarian crisis at the border, and some of it provoked by the actions taken by the administration.”  Right, everything is provoked by President Trump.

And then in what was an apparent reference to the multibillion-dollar disaster aid bill being developed in Congress that Pelosi said, “What is happening at the border is tragic and we hope to address some of that in the disaster supplemental.” Before then going to say, “And we understand our responsibility to secure our border.”  The Democrat have shown time and again that not only do they not understand the need to secure our southern border, but have absolutely NO interest in doing do!

Pelosi’s rather disingenuous, if not totally dishonest, answer came after a member of the ‘press’ asked how Democrats currently view the situation at the southern border, after calling it a “manufactured crisis” for months.  Despite her claim to the contrary, Pelosi along with a rather significant number of other Democrats have gone on record in the recent past in their effort to flat out deny that there is in any way a crisis at the U.S.-Mexico border.  And to claim that there is, is nothing short of racist. 

And it was in a joint statement from Pelosi and Chuckie Schumer back in February that read: “The President’s unlawful declaration over a crisis that does not exist does great violence to our Constitution and makes America less safe, stealing from urgently needed defense funds for the security of our military and our nation.”  The purpose of this pathetic little joint diatribe issued by these two losers, was to simply attack President Trump for having declared a national emergency at the border.

And then it was Steny ‘The Gasbag’ Hoyer who, just this past February had said, “The first, most dramatic thing we found was there is no crisis at the border.”  And it was AFTER this moron had visited the border, near El Paso, that he chose to utter what was really nothing more than an outright lie. It has been for a very long time that whenever one of these Democrats opens their mouth, whatever comes out of it is most assuredly a lie.  And it’s a trend that shows no sign of coming to an end.

On social media, the Democrat Party has seemed to leave itself little or no room for nuance regarding its position on our southern border.  Democrat governors across the U.S. also contended that there was no crisis, and their positions on the issue resulted in less manpower at the U.S.-Mexico border.  Three Democrat governors — Gavin Newsom of California, Tony Evers of Wisconsin, and Michelle Lujan Grisham of New Mexico all pulled their state’s National Guard troops from the border.

And it was that Democrat bonehead Evers who, back in February said, “There is simply not ample evidence to support the president’s contention that there exists a national security crisis at our southwestern border.”  And he then went on to say, “Therefore, there is no justification for the ongoing presence of Wisconsin National Guard personnel at the border.”  I can only assume that they must grow them pretty stupid up there in Wisconsin, especially if this boob can get himself elected.

And it’s as these claims that there is no crisis at the border are being made that literally thousands of illegals have continued to reach the U.S. border every month, pushing immigration facilities past their breaking point.  April marked the second consecutive month where encounters at the southern border topped 100,000 and Border Patrol apprehension numbers have risen every month this year.  Yet Democrats stubbornly refuse to accept the fact that this is anything other than a crisis.

Pelosi said it was necessary for the Republicans and Democrats to reach a consensus on immigration reform. Well no shit, Nancy!  “We have to, I believe, come to comprehensive immigration reform,” she continued. “We have to do it in a way that secures our borders, has a path to citizenship, respects the value of family to us.”  Perhaps such a thing could actually be accomplished if Democrats were truly interested in putting the country before their need to create more Democrat voters.    

Let’s face it, there is absolutely no love of country that can be found anywhere in the Democrat Party, the party in which patriotism is little more than a dirty word.  And sadly, a more disgusting bunch of human beings cannot be found anywhere on the planet.  If a Democrat tells you they love this country, they’re lying to you.  They are a treasonous bunch who have been on, for decades, that which is nothing less than a mission to destroy America.  And yet we just keep on giving them the chance to do so.

The reality here is that this is really nothing more than your classic Leftist behavior. Deny that there's a problem until it's so bad that you must admit it exists because otherwise you look absolutely insane, but then you simply declare that you never denied it and that it's all your opponent's fault. Lies, double-standards, hypocrisy, that's all the Left has. They know their insane ideology will fail but they don't care because, for as long as they are in power, they will enjoy that power to the fullest.

It's time for the American people to recognize the true crisis that exists at our border, and the danger caused by the illegal entry into our country by individuals not looking for amnesty but instead are looking to infiltrate and establish terrorist cells under the cover of the ongoing immigration problems. Look at how many ‘other than Mexicans’ are caught, where they come from and how many of those are from countries who still sponsor and support terrorists intent on harming Americans.

And, on the other hand, Pelosi and her Democrats have made it abundantly clear that they hate God, they hate Christians, they hate our heritage and our traditions. They have made it abundantly clear that they have nothing but contempt for our Bill of Rights, our Constitution and our American way of life.  The have made it abundantly clear that they have organized and orchestrated and coordinated and funded and aided and abetted and encouraged what is nothing less than an invasion.

Clearly, the Democrat Party must be purged from our political system.  Democrats are a menace, they are dangerous and they pose a very serious threat to our ability to survive as a free and sovereign nation.  If we are to have any hope of passing down to our children the same nation that was passed down to us, then we must rid ourselves of those who now seem so determined to prevent us from doing that very thing.  Democrats have continued to makes clear that they are too defective to lead.

VICE PRESIDENT STACEY ABRAMS? GOD HELP US!!!

So I ask you, just how desperate might the Democrats be in what has now become their dedicated mission to defeat President Trump in 2020.  Well, the fact that at least a couple of those folks, who are currently hoping to be the one selected as the nominee of their party regarding our next presidential contest, have made it pretty clear that there is quite literally nothing that they won’t do in their quest to be selected as Trump’s foe in 2020.  Desperation runs deep there in the Democrat Party.

You see, it has been both BEE-TOE O’Rourke and ‘Creepy Joe’ Biden who have now stated that they’d pretty much love nothing better than to have ‘Crybaby Stacey’ Abrams join them on the Democrat ticket.  And now she who has yet to concede her election loss in Georgia in which she was running for the state’s top job, has said that she would be open to such a thing apparently having decided that perhaps she was a bit too hasty in previously declaring that she had no interest in doing so.

Because it was earlier this week, on Thursday to be exact, that Abrams revealed that she has apparently reconsidered and that she would now be “open” to at least talking about running as the vice president with whomever it is that the Democrat nominee might be despite proclaiming just a few weeks ago that she had no intention to “run for second place.”  After all, what else is it that she would have to do other than to continue to travel around whining about she actually won her election in Georgia.

And so it was during an appearance on MSNBC that Abrams said, “After the determination is made about who the Democratic nominee is, if I am not that person for one reason or the other, I am open to the conversation [of running for vice president].”  So if she is “not that person?”  Ok, so suppose she isn’t that person, will she then resort to throwing yet another hissy-fit and claim that she was somehow robbed of a nomination that was rightfully hers simply because she is so deserving. 

And it was also during this same interview that Abrams made it pretty clear that she still has her eye on the top spot as she addressed rumors that she is still at least considering entering what has already become a pretty crowded field of 2020 Democrat presidential hopefuls.  She said she is still watching and trying to decide whether she wants to enter the race, adding that she is confident she could enter the race “as late as the fall and still have a chance to win.”  What a scary thought!

She said, “I think we’ve got a robust crop of candidates and I think they’re having important conversations, but my mission is to make certain that we are keeping that attention focused all the way through the campaign. So, I’m going to keep watching and decide if I need to jump in.”  If she needs to “jump in?”  Great, another narcissist, exactly what we need.  And just what sort of a cockamamie scenario is it that would create what she sees as representing the “need” for her to “jump in?”   

Anyway, it was BEE-TOW who suggested while campaigning in New Hampshire that he might choose Abrams to run with him as his vice presidential candidate.  But that really says more about his level of desperation to win than it says anything about what Abrams might actually bring to the ticket, which is nothing more than one more reason to vote for President Trump.  I mean, come one, what is there about this crybaby that would entice any rational person to vote for a BEE-TOO/Abrams ticket?

However, BEE-TOW was not the first 2020 Democrat presidential hopeful that has suggested Abrams would be an excellent running mate.  Nope, that ‘honor’ goes to ‘Creepy Joe’ Biden whose top campaign advisers had actually discussed adding Abrams to the top of the ticket back in March in an attempt to show Americans that the ex-vice president “isn’t just another old white guy.”  But in reality, that’s exactly what ‘Creepy Joe’ is, just another really old, and really white, white guy. 

Abrams quickly rebuffed the idea of sharing the top of the ticket with ‘Creepy’, stating that “you don’t run for second place.”  And as mentioned previously she has also made it clear that she is still at least considering launching her own bid for the presidency in 2020.  Abrams is well-known for her consistent accusations of widespread voter suppression during the 2018 election cycle, which she further claims is racially motivated. There has been no evidence to corroborate Abrams’s claims.

If you wish to gauge just how truly corrupt our ‘fake news’ media is just think about how they have continued to allow her to blather on and on about voter suppression and racism but NEVER do anything to support her assertions with actual investigative journalism. Why not?  Because she's a fool or a liar and if the media has made any attempt to corroborate her accusations, they obviously came up empty. So they give her a platform to lie.  Think about that, a platform to lie.

A lot of people are sick and tired of politicians who have nothing to offer, but mud-slinging and endless ad hominem attacks.  America needs leaders with solutions and proven abilities, with creativity and insight, with a proven track record of success, actual integrity, the ability to get things done and keep promises made to the country, that are patriotic and love our country and who will do everything in their power to always protect and uphold the Constitution as the law of the land.

And what America most definitely does not need in its government and in those whom we select as our leaders are:  Failed bartenders with the IQ of a cabbage, Lifelong career politicians with a history of lies, deceit, and corruption, Slimy grifters who only want positions of power in government to enrich themselves and their cronies, Mindless automatons whose primary mantra is higher taxes, and to tax the working class even more, Those seeking to subvert Constitutional rights of Americans.

Nor do we need those involved with election fraud or campaign finance violations, or anyone who approves of censorship and silencing American citizens, or who’s opposed to protecting our border and stopping the never-ending illegal alien invasion, or who are toxic narcissists, sociopaths, or psychopaths, etc, etc.!  America needs clean, moral, respectful leaders who can be trusted, and who deserve the responsibility of high offices, and honor their duties to Americans by serving them diligently.

‘CREEPY JOE’ BIDEN TAKES US BACK IN TIME TO THE ELECTION OF 2000…

If I didn’t know better I’d swear old ‘Creepy Joe’ was already asking for a recount in an election that hasn’t yet even taken place.  Because it was earlier this week that our ex-vice president and potential 2020 Democrat presidential nominee, in an effort to do I’m not sure what, dipped into election conspiracy territory arguing that fellow ex-vice president Algore did not actually lose the presidential election back in 2000.  So he too is yet another Democrat who was cheated out of a victory that was his.

So can we also assume that ‘Creepy Joe’ must also think that Japan won World War II, the New York Yankees took the 1960 World Series, Adlai Stevenson defeated Dwight Eisenhower and Jimmy Carter won a second term in the 1980 presidential election?  Who knew?  What a twit.  So to be honest, it is now my very fervent hope that ‘Creepy Joe’ does turn out to be the Democrat nominee because I think that his rather advanced age would become all the more obvious on a debate stage standing next to President Trump.

Anyway, it was during a conversation about his nineties-era crime bill that ‘Creepy’ made the claim that things got worse after Gore lost the election.  It was at a campaign stop in New Hampshire that ‘Creepy’ told the few that had gathered, “I wouldn’t say lost, when a hanging chad sort of did a few things.”  ‘Creepy’s’ idiotic remark continues a history of doubt that the left has cast on the results of the 2000 election.  It’s a lie and he knows it’s a lie, and yet he continues to repeat it.

In 2013, then-vice president ‘Creepy Joe’ insisted to Gore during a fundraiser that he had actually won the 2000 election.  ‘Creepy’ said to Algore, “This man was elected president of the United States of America.”  And added, “No, no, no. He was elected president of the United States of America. But for the good of the nation, when the bad decision in my view was made, he did the right thing for the nation.”  So as we can plainly see, the delusion that somehow Algore won still lives on, on the left.

Despite the never ending claims to the contrary, it was a widely hailed investigation funded by eight major ‘news’ organizations in 2001 that concluded that George W. Bush would have won despite the Supreme Court ruling in 2001.  And yet that was simply not enough to satisfy the many loons who reside on the left and so they have continued to perpetrate that which they know to be a lie in what has become their continuing effort to bring about a lack of confidence in our election process.

So for those who continue to reside in that same little ‘Twilight Zone’ kind of a universe as ‘Creepy’, we’ll go over it again.  Yes, Algore lost!  And why?  Well, simply put, because more states voted for George W. Bush than did for Algore.   Because, as we all know, states vote for president, not people.  You are voting for whom you want your state’s electors to vote for in the Electoral College.  Hence the rationale now coming from a growing number of Democrats for scrapping the Electoral College.   

Democrats continue to call for elections to be determined by popular vote which would be much like a football game being won by the team with the most yards, not by the team with the most points.  Perhaps the number of counties won should become the standard for determining who it is that’s been declared the winner of a presidential election. For instance in the last election, Donald Trump won 2,622 counties and Hitlery, of the hate-America Democrat Party, won 490.

And there is a method to the madness behind the entire ‘stolen elections’ narrative.  If you’re hoping to motivate tens of thousands of your activists across the country what better way would there be than to convince them that the ‘other side’ has been cheating all along so they then feel justified in doing the same.  But there’s just one thing wrong with that, the ‘other side’ hasn’t been cheating so there’s nothing to retaliate against.  So we end up with one side, the Democrats, doing all the cheating.

The methods for motivating these ‘activists’ are pretty numerous.  After all, there is no shortage of people who know how to cheat, especially in states where Voter ID laws have been declared unconstitutional, which only serves to encourage voter fraud, and/or allow same-day registration as well as where absentee ballots are not checked to see who really filled them out, or if those voters really exist and really voted.  Remember, in the last election, some places had voter turnout well over 100%.

Why is it, do you think, that in these more recent times every time a Democrat loses an election they insist upon claiming that they didn’t really lose at all?  In fact, not only did they NOT lose, they actually won and then were somehow cheated out of their victory?  Is it because they’ve gone through their entire lives being little more than recipients of various ‘participation trophies’ or maybe because teachers and professors gave them a passing grades regardless of the quality of their work?

Now in getting back to ‘Creepy’, I’m not discriminating against him because he’s older than dirt, just like I didn’t discriminate against Barry ‘O’ because he was black, or against Hitlery because she was a woman.  The only reason that I chose not to vote for Barry or for Hilery, is the very same reason I would never vote for ‘Creepy’.  And that would, of course, be because of their overwhelming hatred of America and their continuing effort to destroy it in what is their continuing quest for political power. 

But regarding the whole age issue, if he were to actually win the next election it would be by the time that he officially assumed office that ‘Creepy’ would be older, at 78, than Ronald Reagan was, at 77, when he came to the end of his second term.  And keep in mind whomever he would select as his VP would be a mere heartbeat away from being president.  And amongst those names already being floated as his potential vice-president are names like Kamala Harris and Stacy Abrams.  

Now I don’t know about you, but the just the idea of having either one of those leftwing loons as his VP is more than a little frightening.  And to be honest, I wouldn’t trust either one of these two loons, were either one of them actually selected as ‘Creepy’s’ potential number two , not to give old ‘Creepy’ a bit of a nudge while at the top of a very steep, and very long, flight of stairs.  After all, old people take some pretty severe tumbles all the time.  So I doubt anyone would be too shocked.  

But with all that said, ‘Creepy’ may not even be who ends up getting the Democrat nomination.  After all, I think the Democrats are now up to 23 or 24 potential candidates with each new candidate being crazier than the last.  And while ‘Creepy’, at least at this point in time, seems to be leading the pack, I’m sure everyone remembers how back in 2016, when we had 16 Republicans running, it was Jeb Bush who everyone thought would end up being the nominee.  So a lot can still happen.

SO, MIGHT THE SHOE ‘FINALLY’ BE ON THE OTHER FOOT???

Why is it that what’s good for the Republicans is never what’s good for the Democrats?  And while I would like to think that what may now be underway, courtesy of our new Attorney General (AG), is a perfect example of the shoe being placed on the other foot, I prefer to wait and see how everything comes to play out.  After all, it’s a very rare event when we’re left holding anything other than the shitty end of the stick simply because we’re unwilling to take on the Democrats at their own game.

So anyway, AG Bill Barr, has assigned the United States attorney in Connecticut, Mr. John Durham, to look into the origins of the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s probe into the Trump campaign, and in so doing has officially made heads explode all across the Democrat Party, and the media, from Washington DC to Hollyweird.  And Mr. Barr as now earned for himself the level of disdain typically reserved for those who dare to disagree with those who are very much used to playing by their own set of rules.

Barr had previously drawn the ire of Democrats’, and their friends in the media, just last month when he made the argument that “spying did occur” during the 2016 presidential election and vowed to get to the bottom of it.  He said, “The question is whether it was adequately predicated. And I’m not suggesting that it wasn’t adequately predicated. But I need to explore that.”  And yet that was enough for some to start calling for his resignation and others to call for HIS impeachment!

Barr’s assignment of Mr. Durham likely indicates that his review of the origins of the probe warrants further investigation and action.  Separately, the DOJ’s inspector general, Michael Horowitz, is due to issue a report on his findings on whether the FBI acted improperly when investigating the Trump campaign and launching an investigation in July 2016.  While President Trump nominated Durham, Mr. Durham has conducted special investigations under administrations of both parties.

Mr. Barr seems to have opted to give a U.S. Attorney the assignment rather than to go the route of allowing a special counsel to look into the origins of what’s being called Spygate or that little exercise in corruption executed by Barry and Hitlery where the full might of the U.S. government was used to target the Trump campaign during the 2016 election.  The FBI opened a series of illegal Counter Intelligence investigations into Trump officials and also sent spies to various campaign volunteers. 

And I think it worth noting that Mr. Durham will have prosecutorial power whereas the Inspector General does not.  So is it too much to hope for that the filthy dirty cops in the FBI and crooked lawyers at the DOJ and the various politicians and judges they conspired with to commit crimes against private citizens and the Trump campaign, will see prison time?  Or is it more likely that we will end up with tens of thousands of pages of documents, zero prosecutions and millions more tax dollars wasted?

And make no mistake here, unless some of these criminals end up being perp walked into a federal courtroom, and on national television, this shameless abuse of power to persecute, bankrupt and intimidate American citizens will only continue to be used as a tool by those on the left.  I serious doubt ‘The Swamp’ will ever be successfully drained, it’s simply been in existence for too long.  But kudos to President Trump for having exposed them and for perhaps even taking just a few of them down.

The fact is, there became a real possibility of a person reaching high office who wasn't a member of ‘The Club.’  They could care less about his plans for trade or the economy or even healthcare, they were afraid he would expose them. So they started a campaign against him, with the FISA warrants just an added thing, something they threw together to give some credence to their coup attempt.  If discovered they could always fall back to the “well we were investigating the Russians” ruse.

And if you thought the Democrats had lost their minds up to now, get ready for them to come out frothing at the mouth when this investigation leads straight back to the Barry ‘O’ White House, ensnaring their Messiah along with many of his underlings and, perhaps even, Hitlery herself. The very first step this new U.S. Attorney will and must do is convene a Federal Grand Jury to receive testimony under oath. If this is done, I think we can rest assured the investigation is real and people will be going to jail.

Finally, and on a slightly different note, these are three undeniable facts for any American who even has a glimmer of brainpower concerning the current state of the Democrat Party:

1. If you are a male over the age of 25 and vote Democrat in ANY election, even for an immediate relative, you are, for a lack of a better term, a f*cking moron.  There’s simply no other way to put it.  You’re allowed a certain amount of slack up to then, and allowed to remain disillusioned and gullibility to all the socialist propaganda up to that age.  Beyond that, you’re on your own.

2. If you are ‘white’ and male or female, because after all those are the only two viable options, and vote Democrat in ANY election, even for an immediate relative, you will be considered as being legally insane.  Hint: they hate you. No, they seriously do and would relish destroying and eliminating you in a heartbeat.

3. And finally, if you are of Jewish ethnicity and an American citizen and vote Democrat in ANY election, even for an immediate relative, you are beyond hope as you are voting for someone who would like to see you exterminated.  I'm not Jewish and it so beyond laughable that a Jewish American would EVER vote for ANY Democrat.

ADAM ‘SHIFTY’ SCHIFF, THE MAN WHO KNEW TOO LITTLE…

After surviving what was 8 very long years of Barack Hussein Obama as president, or he who was without question the least qualified individual to ever have been elected president, though just by the skin of our teeth and not without some pretty significant damage being done to our country along the way, and on any number of different levels, I feel pretty confident in saying that America will survive the Trump presidency whether it lasts 4 or 8 years.  And personally, I have no doubt that the country will be left far better off than it was when President Trump was elected.

Now obviously, not everyone agrees with me on that.  Take, for instance, Democrat Adam ‘Shifty’ Schiff, who, just this past Sunday, made the rather bold claim that the country simply could not “survive” a second term with President Trump in office.  The California lawmaker made those comments during a rather idiotic little exchange that took place with former Clinton hack and now faux ‘journalist’ George ‘Stephy’ Stephanopoulos on ABC’s “This Week” after Stephy had just finished playing a clip of President Trump referring to a possible 2020 victory at a Wednesday rally in Florida.

Stephy said, “You heard the president right there, he says you all are going to elect him in 2020.”  To which ‘Shifty’ responded, “That’s not going to happen and I don’t think this country could survive another four years of a president like this who gets up every day trying to find new and inventive ways to divide us.”  And Shifty went on to say, “He doesn’t seem to understand that a fundamental aspect of his job is to try to make us a more perfect union. But that’s not at all where he’s coming from.”  What an odd thing to hear coming from a guy whose party seeks only to destroy America.

Anyway, it was then that ‘Shifty’ confidently predicted that the Trump presidency would not last more than for years, and I‘m sure he’s hoping that it doesn’t  even last that long.  ‘Shifty’ said, “And he’s going to be defeated.”  And then he went on to say, “He has to be defeated because I don’t know how much more our democratic institutions can take of this kind of attack on the rule of law.”  But after listening to many of the proposals coming from the Democrats now vying to take on the president, it’s they who pose a far greater threat to our institutions as well as to the ‘rule of law.’

Now speaking as someone who loves this country, it would be in using the last 50 years or so as my reference that I would have to say the one political party that has seemed to go well out of its way to represent a very real threat to our democratic institutions as well as to the rule of law has been, without question, the Democrat Party.  And Democrats continue to this day with their very determined effort to undermine both our institutions and the rule of law. And it has become obvious that what the president is being accused of is what the Democrats are actually guilty of.

And no offense to old ‘Shifty’, but it’s whenever he’s accusing the president of being some sort of a dictator that he’s simply talking out his ass.  I mean, say what you will about President Trump, by when compared to the sort of corruption witnessed coming from Barry ‘O’, President Trump is a saint.  Because as much as Democrats have continued to make the claim that there was not a whiff of scandal at any time during the entire time Barry was president, anyone who happened not to be living under a rock during that time knows full well that that is nothing less than a blatant lie.

And let’s be very clear here, for decades it’s been the Democrats who have worked to divide the American people in any way that they could.  Whether it was to pit men against women, blacks against whites, gays against straights, rich against poor, it mattered only that the desired result was achieved.  And yet it remains the Democrat Party that continues to portray President Trump as the one being divisive.  And dare I say that this country truly would not have survived or, at the very least, been made totally unrecognizable had crooked Hitlery won in 2016, and not Donald Trump.

And while I’m not at all sure what the life expectancy might actually be for those still suffering from a more extreme case of Trump Derangement Syndrome (TDS), such as ‘Shifty’, I am pretty sure that those so afflicted would likely not survive another four years of a Trump presidency without ending up in a nice safe padded cell somewhere where they could longer do any serious harm to either themselves or to the country.  It’s with each passing day that these people seem to become just a bit more mentally unstable, to the point where their fitness for office should be called into question.   

Sadly, if Democrats weren't so anti-American we could solve many of our continuing problems under President Trump. But Democrats have no interest in doing so as they favor much higher taxes, are for open borders, don't care that Islam, far from being a ‘religion of peace’ is, instead, a death cult and don't care that our public school system is now run by leftist crazies who rewrite history and support boys posing as girls and vice versa for shower room privileges and sports. They care about one thing and one thing only, the power to lord over all of us and in so doing, control our lives.

The disease of progressivism, and those afflicted with it, now represents the greatest threat to this country and to our freedoms.  President Trump succeeded in beating back that which was nothing less than an attempted coup perpetrated by the ‘Deep State,’ the participants of which were many in our national intelligence agencies and aided by those with names like Comey, Clapper and Brennan, Hitlery and Obama, all of whom were supported by those in our ‘fake news’ media.  And yet ‘Shifty’ is still trying to convince us it’s President Trump that we need to be most worried about.

IT’S HITLERY WHO WOULD HAVE BEEN PUTIN’S ‘MAN’ ON THE INSIDE…

Despite the continuing Democrat fairytale currently being perpetuated by just about everyone involved in the ‘fake news’ media and EVERY Democrat, including Hitlery herself, regarding how President Trump is something of a stooge for Vlad Putin, can we please put all of the nonsense aside and agree that Russia could have achieved its objectives, far more easily and at much less cost, if it had been Hitlery who was elected president and not Donald Trump.   

And let’s face it, you’d have to be a complete moron, or a hardcore Democrat hack, not to realize that autocrats, dictators, and warlords everywhere were absolutely salivating over the prospects of a Hitlery presidency. They very much favored, even preferred, the far more malleable Hitlery instead of the nationalistic and assertive Donald Trump who campaigned on, and then adopted, a far more aggressive “America first” leadership approach to defense and foreign policy.

That point is even more compelling, given President Trump's more uncompromising U.S. policy with regard to Russia.  And it was likely during the president’s first year in office that Russia first felt the consequences of a more assertive United States.  Because, as you may remember, it was in November 2017 that the U.S. approved the $10.5-billion sale of Patriot anti-missile systems to NATO ally Poland to counter then perceived Russian aggression. 

And then it was in December that the U.S. authorized the transfer of anti-tank weapons to Ukraine to help that nation defend against Russian-backed separatists.  U.S. troop presence in Eastern Europe was increased over Obama-era levels to bolster European defenses, while the U.S. imposed monetary sanctions targeting individual Russian actors and companies.  Further, the Trump administration persisted in convincing U.S. NATO allies to increase their defense spending. 

And so it would seem to be rather obvious, at least to me, that Russia would fondly remember Barry ‘O’s less than impressive secretary of state.  Her inane "reset button" set the tone.  Old Vlad had surveyed the Hitlery of Benghazi infamy and noted the facilitation of the transfer of large uranium assets to Russia.  The U.S. obliged the Kremlin by removing missile defense systems from Central Europe and never did more than complain about Crimea's annexation. 

And then there was Barry’s fuzzy line-in-the-sand indecisiveness over Syrian chemical weapons that made way for Russia's effective military intervention in Syria.  And Vlad surely approved of Barry's concessions to Iran on the nuclear ‘deal,’ and it was Barry who had once told former Russian president Medvedev that Vlad should give him more “space” because after his election he would "have more flexibility."  Barry had given Vlad a peak at what a Hitlery presidency might be like.

And it was in Hitlery that Russia (read Putin) saw a candidate far more interested in globalists’ demands from Paris, Katowice, and Davos than on the truly tough issues like global proxy wars, Russian revanchism, nuclear proliferation, and NATO solidarity.  Given the world's pre-election political and media consensus, a Hitlery victory was almost assuredly a given inside the Kremlin.  Just as it was here at home among those in ‘fake news’ and especially, the Democrat Party.

And so Vlad was likely just as surprised as CNN to wake up that November morning in 2016 to learn that the “impossible” had in fact happened.  Look I don’t think anyone can deny that there was some level of Russian interference in the 2016 election.  But at the same time one must admit that there was no organized scheme of coordination or dreaded “collusion” with the Trump campaign.  There was nothing to be gained by doing so as Hitlery was Russia's preferred candidate, hands down!

So why was it that Russia would choose to interfere?  Well, I would think that obvious, to sow discord and acrimony among the political parties and voters to undermine American government, society, and leadership.  And can we all at least agree on the fact that U.S. competitors and adversaries would love nothing better than to see, above all else, America fiscally exhaust ourselves on social programs instead of on national defense and security.  Or is that obvious just to me?   

After eight long years of Barry ‘O’ Vlad had every reason to think that the U.S. was far more interested in Davos, Paris, and climate change than in any Russian adventurism.  And so Vlad & Co. sought to further breakdown of societal mores and law and order and to take a certain amount of pleasure in watching Americans further divided by identity politics, bathroom protocols, and political animus.  And there are many who seem more than willing to fall for that, hook, line and sinker. 

With Russian, along with interference from any number of other sinister players in the 2016 presidential election, one person was ultimately responsible for this nation's defense and security as "Commander-in-Chief."  And of course that was Barack Hussein Obama.  And yet with full knowledge of what was determined organized foreign interference, he ultimately failed in oath-sworn responsibilities to keep the nation's democratic processes secure and free from that interference.

The fact is that it was in Hitlery that the Russians had someone who could very easily be bought, and they knew it.  But none of this even begins to cover Hitlery's most despicable crimes. With her use of an unsecured email server handling highly classified State Department correspondence, she left the door wide open for Russia, China, and most likely N. Korea and Iran to infiltrate every part of the U.S. government, perhaps even our military.  She is obnoxiously corrupt!   

This is treason, and espionage, and not just once or twice, but thousands of times. Every time she sent or received something from the White House, she left open the door for that system to be breached as well.  The Russians knew this. The Chinese also knew.  And given her willingness, even eagerness to accept bribes and kickbacks through her 'Foundation', it's conceivable, even highly likely, that she might even have sold access to one or both.  Nothing would surprise me.

And it was Vlad who ‘invested’ $145 Million into the Clinton slush fund and $1.2M for a 60 minute speech.  So why would he have decided to do that?  Because he knew how easily the Clinton’s and any number of other top Democrats could be bought off by China, so why would he want someone who doesn't need Russia's or China's money? To normal, thinking people it made no sense. Only to those who fear the jig is up and their useful idiots believed something so delusional.

And we haven’t even touched on the direction that President Trump has now taken U.S. energy production, which is another huge reason Vlad would have much rather dealt with a President Hitlery.  Because there is absolutely no doubt that Hitlery would have favored a continuation of Barry ‘O’s ongoing war on fossil fuel development in the U.S. as opposed to a President Trump who had promised to reduce regulations and to fast track pipeline approvals. 

Russia's economy is extremely dependent on gas and oil exports so the last thing Vlad would want is increased U.S. production putting downward pressure on global energy prices.  Why do you think Russia, and other oil producing adversaries, donate millions to American environmental organizations?  The notion that Vlad favored Trump over Hillary is ludicrous yet it's generally accepted as fact even still.  Vlad couldn't dream of any more feckless dupes than Barry and Hitlery.

A PATHETIC HITLERY LECTURES US ALL ON “THE RULE OF LAW???”

Like an overweight dog with its favorite bone, Hitlery Clinton remains stuck in the past as she stubbornly refuses to move beyond November 8, 2016.  Even after fretting that Donald Trump would not accept her victory, it has been she who has been unable to accept her loss for going on three years now.  And it was earlier this week that Hitlery again made very clear that she is still not quite ready to accept blame for her rather humiliating defeat at the hands of a complete political novice, doing so during an appearance at one of our so-called institutions of ‘higher learning.’ 

You see it was this past Wednesday night at Dartmouth College in New Hampshire that two time loser Democrat presidential candidate Hitlery made the rather hypocritical declaration in saying that Republican lawmakers needed to decide if they care more about the ‘rule of law’ than they about supporting President Trump.  Hitlery said, “We are at a crisis point and I say that with great sadness.”  So says someone who remains one of the two people considered by many to be the most corrupt individuals to ever run for the office of president.  The other, of course, being Barack Obama.

She continued, “The biggest disappointment to me has been the Republican Party. With very few exceptions very very few Republicans have stood up and most of them left, they didn’t run for reelection. That is happening again this time. So you have a Republican party particularly in the Senate that is not looking out for the country. And they have occasionally disagreed with Trump on a few things but overall they have been unfortunately intimidated or willing to go along.”  Again she’s being more than a bit disingenuous here, her biggest disappointment is that…she lost.

Hitlery said there will be “big court fights,” that will “end up in the Supreme Court” over the Trump administration’s defiance of congressional subpoenas.  She added, “We’ll see whether it’s the rule of law or the rule of Trump that the Republicans in the Congress and in the courts are going to abide by.”  It’s in Hitlery that again we have someone on the left who seems to have forgotten entirely about all of the many subpoenas ignored by Barry &Co., as well as by herself.  And for someone who is not in possession of the required plumbing, that’s all pretty ballsy!

So, is that not the funniest thing you’ve EVER heard, Hitlery choosing to lecture Americans on the “rule of law?”  And after all of the crimes she has personally committed and yet has still managed to remain able to roam around free.  She has to be joking, right?  Ah yes, tis good to be a Democrat, and someone viewed as being completely unable to do anything wrong, despite the fact that there now exists a mountain of evidence that would at least seem to provide more than ample proof of her personal involvement in a surprising number of illegal acts.

At this point, if I were her I believe I would be searching out a few of my many contacts there within the ‘deep state’ and asking them to assist me in moving underground and to perhaps wipe away my identity (“Like with a cloth, or something?) and to assist me in assuming some new identity in a foreign country without an extradition agreement.  But I doubt we could ever be that lucky, I fear we that will likely be saddled with this perpetual sore loser until the day that she finally expires, a day that cannot get here soon enough for me.

But I can’t help wondering when it might have been that Hitlery ever really cared about the “rule of law.” What is there in her past that might indicate that that was ever the case?  Not to mention the fact that it was her husband, and our ex-president, who committed perjury.  Was THAT the ‘rule of law?”  She is a charlatan and a grifter, just like her pervert of a husband, and both belong in prison, for the rest of their lives!  She is the poster child for all that is wrong with the modern day Democrat Party and the symbol for why the Democrats need to be kept few in number.

But seriously, all kidding aside, her choosing to make such a patently dishonest claim would actually be funny if it didn’t demonstrate, and in very stark terms, how it is that those who are rich and powerful, and staunch members of the left, are able to avoid the punishment that the rest of us ‘little people’ would, most assuredly, be forced to endure.  This woman and her husband have, together, committed treason, sedition and any number of other crimes against the people of this country and still she has the nerve to lecture us on the ‘rule of law’ and what's best for the country.

Personally, I think that President Trump's biggest mistake thus far was in choosing NOT to prosecute this bitch, before then putting her behind bars where she rightfully belongs and to then throw away the key.  And her pervert of husband should be right next door in an adjoining cell.  I will, however, cut their daughter a certain amount of slack if for no other reason than because she’s just so damned ugly.  This single family has done more harm to this country than I could have ever thought possible.  And that she came as close as she did to becoming president is a national embarrassment. 

I have no doubt that this condescending bitch will likely go to her grave claiming that she was somehow cheated out of being able to assume her rightful place as the first female president of these United States and by someone who was only able to defeat her by cheating.  The 2016 presidential election was hers to lose, and she did.  She was so confident of having it the bag that she thought victory would come to her simply because she deserved it.  And all she has done since is to attack the winner, as if it was his fault that she ran one of the inept campaigns in recent memory. 

Even with all that said, Hitlery will forever view Donald Trump as being the source for that which she still considers to be the unimaginable and, to her way of thinking, the undeserved level of embarrassment that she continues to be made to suffer and that she is, apparently, yet to get over.  After all, she was considered to be the most qualified person to EVER run for president, just ask any loony member of the Democrat Party and they’ll certainly tell you.  And so she still wonders how it is possible that things could have gone so horribly wrong.

MORE FROM SHE WHO IS LIKELY THE ‘DUMBEST BITCH’ ON THE PLANET…

Just when you think you’ve heard it all from Sheila Jackson Lee, open comes her big fat mouth to prove you wrong.  Every time she speaks she literally leaves no doubt whatsoever that she truly is one of the dumbest, brain dead bitches on the entire planet.  I could list all of her previous examples that make it crystal clear that she has all the intelligence of your average ice cube, but instead I would simply direct everyone to YouTube, where you can hear her idiotic comments from her own mouth. 

And anyone who might have been tuned into MSNBC recently would have witnessed yet another example when she appeared on something called “All In,” during which Jackson Lee said she agreed with fellow Democrat moron Jerry ‘Pumpkin Head’ Nadler and several of her other colleagues’ assessment that a “constitutional crisis” is now underway given the fact that the Trump administration has chosen not to cooperate with congressional Democrats’ effort to ‘investigate’ the White House.

However, she offered an additional term to describe what she sees as now being underway because of the administration’s “rejection” of congressional Democrats’ requests.  And how dare anyone “reject’ the demands being made by what is nothing more than a bunch of pompous, hypocritical, scumbag Democrats!  The very same Democrats, I might add, who viewed the most corrupt individual to ever hold office, Barack Hussein Obama, as nothing less than being as pure as the wind driven snow.

Anyway, it was this dim bulb, Jackson Lee, who said, “[I] saw this coming and mentioned the constitutional crisis was pending over the last couple of weeks.”  And she went on to say, “When I concluded my remarks today in the hearing, I added another metaphor, which was we’re seeing a Saturday Night Massacre of rejection. What I meant was the Saturday Night Massacre occurred for the toppling of officials who refused to adhere to Nixon’s instructions.”  She is so dreaming!

She said, “We’re getting from the White House a massacre of rejection — rejecting every single constitutional request that the Congress is making on behalf of the American people.”  And she added, “I think that is really the point,” she continued. “This is not a congressional fight. This is not a Republican-Democratic fight. This is actually the duty of the Congress in its legislative and oversight responsibilities that the president is now rejecting.” That same ‘duty’ seemed not to exist from 2009-2016.

She said, “I don’t think he is going to last. I don’t think this is going to last. I think the American people are going to see clearly that this is not in the best interest of this country. And once that occurs, once we pursue the legal options, which is going to the floor of the House for the final vote of this civil contempt, holding in our back pocket inherent contempt, moving forward through the courts, and I believe we can make the argument that this goes to the very seat of government. And we ask the federal courts to expedite their decision.”

This poor excuse for a human being has great difficulty whenever tasked with having to string more than two words together and into one coherent sentence. That, and she seems to have this recurring problem with the whole Constitution thing too.  It is NOT the role of Congress to interfere with the chief executive of this country or his administration. They do not NEED to see grand jury testimony of people not charged with a crime.  The law that they themselves crafted back in 1999 says so!

Mueller and Co. was as biased and as partisan a pack of Democrats that could have possibly been hoped for in conducting an ‘investigation’ and yet they were unable to indict President Trump for anything.  For over two years the president has cooperated with Congress and Mueller with their endless investigations that lead to the discovery of nothing.  And still the Democrats won't accept it any more than they did when Hitlery lost the election. This isn't oversight, this is an abuse and perversion of power.

During her entire 24 year ‘career’ in the House, this worthless old sow has done nothing more than to belch out hate against anyone she doesn't like while sucking up taxpayer dollars along with every benefit in the book, and what is it that she has actually done to move our country forward.  NOT A GOD DAMN THING!  I am so sick of this pathetic gang of corrupt scumbags that comprise today’s Democrat Party.  And it just keeps getting worse. How stupid must you be to vote for morons like these?

And I keep waiting to hear a voice of reason to spring forth from the Democrats regarding this ongoing lunacy, but they all seem blinded by their ‘Trump Derangement Syndrome’ which now seems to have reached epidemic proportions in the party.  And until I start seeing some of these dirty cops and corrupt Democrats headed off to jail this entire exercise in hypocrisy will continue to be seen for exactly what it is, an attempt to remove a duly elected president from office with NO just cause!  

And let’s face it, “I don't think” are probably the three most honest words ever uttered by this mental midget.  She's been going on and on about impeachment since the day President Trump was elected. Does she really believe we’re that stupid?  The last couple of weeks my ass.  Remember this is the same moron who also tried to lead impeachment against George W Bush. Apparently, for this moron, the ‘high crime or misdemeanor’ is being a Republican and President. It's time the people let her go.

And I have to agree, there is a crisis underway, but it is a crisis of the Democrats’ own making, and is a crisis driven by the fact that not one of these Democrats seem to possess even the most basic understanding of our Constitution.  Starting an illegal investigation of a duly elected president over pure speculation using a dossier that they knew to be untrue has made clear just what the real “constitutional crisis” is! This is a party driven by hate and a desire to acquire power no matter what the cost.

It was almost immediately after Trump announced he was running that we heard there was NO WAY he was going to win the nomination, and when he did we then heard how there was NO WAY Trump was going to win the election, and when he won we heard how Trump was never going to be accepted by the Electoral College, and we he was we heard how Trump was never going to last six months, then we heard how Trump was never going to survive the special council witch hunt, blah, blah, blah.

If there is one certainty in this our ever-changing world it’s the fact that the Democrat Party has always been on the wrong side of every truly important issue, and it seems to be only getting worse. And yet, the Democrat Party remains somewhat viable only because of those in our ‘fake news’ media who serve as nothing less than the propaganda wing of the party. If America had a reliable media, the Democrat Party would be relegated to permanent minority status and no longer a threat.

Sadly, I fear our country is doomed. And until we take it upon ourselves to reduce the number of Democrats in government the fate of our country will remain uncertain.  Because they seek to flood our country with all manner of Third World trash from nearly every shithole country on the planet, these ‘immigrants’ who come here seeking nothing but freebies with the American people being forced to cover the costs courtesy of their taxes.  The priorities of the Democrat Party are killing us!

Ms. Jackson Lee is correct about one thing, President Trump won't last beyond January 2025 when his second term comes to an end.  And it will be by that time that many of her fellow colleagues in the Democrat Party, perhaps even she herself, may very well have ended up being safely tucked away in a padded cell somewhere where they are no longer a danger to themselves or to the country.  Because by then they will likely have been driven completely mad by their hatred of President Trump.