Despite the continuing Democrat fairytale currently being perpetuated by just about everyone involved in the ‘fake news’ media and EVERY Democrat, including Hitlery herself, regarding how President Trump is something of a stooge for Vlad Putin, can we please put all of the nonsense aside and agree that Russia could have achieved its objectives, far more easily and at much less cost, if it had been Hitlery who was elected president and not Donald Trump.
And let’s face it, you’d have to be a complete moron, or a
hardcore Democrat hack, not to realize that autocrats, dictators, and warlords everywhere
were absolutely salivating over the prospects of a Hitlery presidency. They
very much favored, even preferred, the far more malleable Hitlery instead of
the nationalistic and assertive Donald Trump who campaigned on, and then
adopted, a far more aggressive “America first” leadership approach to defense
and foreign policy.
That point is even more compelling, given President Trump's
more uncompromising U.S. policy with regard to Russia. And it was likely during the president’s
first year in office that Russia first felt the consequences of a more
assertive United States. Because, as you
may remember, it was in November 2017 that the U.S. approved the $10.5-billion
sale of Patriot anti-missile systems to NATO ally Poland to counter then perceived
Russian aggression.
And then it was in December that the U.S. authorized the
transfer of anti-tank weapons to Ukraine to help that nation defend against
Russian-backed separatists. U.S. troop
presence in Eastern Europe was increased over Obama-era levels to bolster
European defenses, while the U.S. imposed monetary sanctions targeting
individual Russian actors and companies.
Further, the Trump administration persisted in convincing U.S. NATO
allies to increase their defense spending.
And so it would seem to be rather obvious, at least to me,
that Russia would fondly remember Barry ‘O’s less than impressive secretary of
state. Her inane "reset button"
set the tone. Old Vlad had surveyed the
Hitlery of Benghazi infamy and noted the facilitation of the transfer of large
uranium assets to Russia. The U.S.
obliged the Kremlin by removing missile defense systems from Central Europe and
never did more than complain about Crimea's annexation.
And then there was Barry’s fuzzy line-in-the-sand
indecisiveness over Syrian chemical weapons that made way for Russia's
effective military intervention in Syria.
And Vlad surely approved of Barry's concessions to Iran on the nuclear ‘deal,’
and it was Barry who had once told former Russian president Medvedev that Vlad
should give him more “space” because after his election he would "have
more flexibility." Barry had given Vlad
a peak at what a Hitlery presidency might be like.
And it was in Hitlery that Russia (read Putin) saw a candidate
far more interested in globalists’ demands from Paris, Katowice, and Davos than
on the truly tough issues like global proxy wars, Russian revanchism, nuclear
proliferation, and NATO solidarity.
Given the world's pre-election political and media consensus, a Hitlery
victory was almost assuredly a given inside the Kremlin. Just as it was here at home among those in
‘fake news’ and especially, the Democrat Party.
And so Vlad was likely just as surprised as CNN to wake up
that November morning in 2016 to learn that the “impossible” had in fact happened. Look I don’t think anyone can deny that there
was some level of Russian interference in the 2016 election. But at the same time one must admit that there
was no organized scheme of coordination or dreaded “collusion” with the Trump
campaign. There was nothing to be gained
by doing so as Hitlery was Russia's preferred candidate, hands down!
So why was it that Russia would choose to interfere? Well, I would think that obvious, to sow discord
and acrimony among the political parties and voters to undermine American
government, society, and leadership. And
can we all at least agree on the fact that U.S. competitors and adversaries
would love nothing better than to see, above all else, America fiscally exhaust
ourselves on social programs instead of on national defense and security. Or is that obvious just to me?
After eight long years of Barry ‘O’ Vlad had every reason to
think that the U.S. was far more interested in Davos, Paris, and climate change
than in any Russian adventurism. And so
Vlad & Co. sought to further breakdown of societal mores and law and order
and to take a certain amount of pleasure in watching Americans further divided
by identity politics, bathroom protocols, and political animus. And there are many who seem more than willing
to fall for that, hook, line and sinker.
With Russian, along with interference from any number of other
sinister players in the 2016 presidential election, one person was ultimately
responsible for this nation's defense and security as "Commander-in-Chief." And of course that was Barack Hussein Obama. And yet with full knowledge of what was determined
organized foreign interference, he ultimately failed in oath-sworn
responsibilities to keep the nation's democratic processes secure and free from
that interference.
The fact is that it was in Hitlery that the Russians had
someone who could very easily be bought, and they knew it. But none of this even begins to cover Hitlery's
most despicable crimes. With her use of an unsecured email server handling
highly classified State Department correspondence, she left the door wide open
for Russia, China, and most likely N. Korea and Iran to infiltrate every part
of the U.S. government, perhaps even our military. She is obnoxiously corrupt!
This is treason, and espionage, and not just once or twice,
but thousands of times. Every time she sent or received something from the
White House, she left open the door for that system to be breached as well. The Russians knew this. The Chinese also knew.
And given her willingness, even
eagerness to accept bribes and kickbacks through her 'Foundation', it's
conceivable, even highly likely, that she might even have sold access to one or
both. Nothing would surprise me.
And it was Vlad who ‘invested’ $145 Million into the Clinton
slush fund and $1.2M for a 60 minute speech. So why would he have decided to do that? Because he knew how easily the Clinton’s and any
number of other top Democrats could be bought off by China, so why would he
want someone who doesn't need Russia's or China's money? To normal, thinking
people it made no sense. Only to those who fear the jig is up and their useful
idiots believed something so delusional.
And we haven’t even touched on the direction that President
Trump has now taken U.S. energy production, which is another huge reason Vlad
would have much rather dealt with a President Hitlery. Because there is absolutely no doubt that
Hitlery would have favored a continuation of Barry ‘O’s ongoing war on fossil
fuel development in the U.S. as opposed to a President Trump who had promised
to reduce regulations and to fast track pipeline approvals.
Russia's economy is extremely dependent on gas and oil exports so the last thing Vlad would want is increased U.S. production putting downward pressure on global energy prices. Why do you think Russia, and other oil producing adversaries, donate millions to American environmental organizations? The notion that Vlad favored Trump over Hillary is ludicrous yet it's generally accepted as fact even still. Vlad couldn't dream of any more feckless dupes than Barry and Hitlery.
No comments:
Post a Comment