In what I can only assume was some bizarre attempt
to justify, or to perhaps explain away, what has become today the lowest labor
force participation rate since the Jimmy Carter era, we heard from the head of
the Labor Department's Bureau of Labor Statistics, on Thursday, the idiotic
claim that students and retirees are "an important part of what's going
on" regarding our labor force participation rate. Erica Groshen also said the nation's
taxpayer-funded social safety net is yet another factor that helps explains the
94 million Americans who are no longer in the labor force. She went on to say, "In older, tougher times,
we didn't have as much of a safety net, so some of the people who are not
participating are people who we, as a society, have decided we are going to
support in some other way."
First of all, I’m not some stupid Democrat who’s
going to take what this putz says and be only too happy to believe it. Because it’s all bullshit! Look, during the recession that took hold in
Barry “Almighty's” first term, the number of people on food stamps went from an
average of 33,490,00 in fiscal 2009 to an average 47,636,000 in fiscal 2013. It
has drifted down a little since then, to an estimated 43,478,196 in May 2016,
the latest month for which numbers are available. At the same time, the Social Security
disability rolls have swelled, from around 9,296,490 when Barry first took
office to 10,664,290 in July 2016. In
July 2016, 94,333,000 Americans were not in the labor force. The labor force
participation rate was 62.8 percent in July.
July's 62.8 percent rate remains near what would be a 39-year low.
Then this airhead proceeded to ask, rhetorically of
course, the question: "So what are the people who are out of the labor
force doing?" And she then
proceeded to answer her own question saying, "Many of them...are in school
but not working," she said. She called it "an important part of
what's going on." And then she went
on to say, "And we're seeing actually that fewer students are working than
used to in previous years, so that's some part of the decline in participation,
is that our young people are staying in school longer and less likely to work
while they're...more focused on their school work.” But this is the kind of idiotic pabulum we
get from these people and have been getting since Barry first came into
office. And it’s what we can expect to
continue should Hitlery, God forbid, get elected. But I digress.
So anyway, it was then that this hapless reject from
some loony leftwing commune went on to say, "The other trends that we have
are...the baby boomers who are a huge demographic bulge, are now retiring, and
as we reach retirement age....that means that a larger share of our population
is going to be retired. So that's a very important part of the demographic
story that underlies the decrease in labor force participation." There are roughly 75 million Baby Boomers who
were born between 1946 and 1964. They began turning 65, retirement age, in
2011. Myself, I was born in 1952, and
I’ll tell you right now I REFUSE to be called a "Baby-Boomer" for the
very simple fact that I have NOTHING in common with what is essentially nothing
more than hoard of Liberal, mindless, destroyers of our once proud nation.
How much of a mind-numbed imbecile does one really
need to be to say something like, “we, as a society, have decided we are going
to support in some other way," Sorry, you brain-damaged bimbo, but
"We" decided nothing of the sort.
It was the Liberal/Progressive
politicians who figured out that they could get themselves elected by purchasing
the votes of would-be freeloaders with the taxes which the rest of us are quite
literally forced to pay. Students are
not skipping out of the work force to focus more on their studies. Instead they're borrowing increasing amounts
of money in the form of "student loans" which pay for everything from
tuition to clothes to kegger money. And,
now, Hitlery wants to give away their debt payment. Let's just go for $30 trillion in debt. After all, it’s "for the children".
I don’t suppose all Boomers are Liberal, but I think
most are. But that being said, you have
to admit, that starting with the anti-establishment days; the drugs, free sex,
etc, the (our) group has been PRIMARILY identified as the ones who have
'changed' things in society.... even if those things DIDN'T NEED CHANGING. What is our world standing in education,
today, compared to our standing in 1960?
Eighty percent of eighth grade students in the US can’t read or do math
at their grade level. Is this "Better"? How about the sexual revolution? Trans sexual bathrooms? Gay middle school students? AIDS? Single Moms.
Fatherless children..... The war on Christianity... Godless people killing each
other for 'fun'. No respect for life. Better? Responsible Government? Truthful
Government? Transparency? Nope, sorry.
I think what a great many of the 'Boomers' did, was to see the benefits of selling out and in the process they essentially became worse than what they had opposed in their youth. It's like the book, 1984 was an instruction manual, of sorts. I HATE pretty much everything the Boomers have championed over the last 40 years, because look how things have so badly deteriorated in this country. We’ve been made to morph into an American that has become populated by the equivalent of limp-wristed Europeans. People have forgotten what it once meant to be ‘American.’ Things like work ethic, avoiding at all costs the act of becoming dependent upon the government, true patriotism and love of country. It’s like none of it ever existed. There are so many reasons why Hitlery should never be president.
No comments:
Post a Comment