'PROFESSOR' MARC LAMONT HILL |
I think we are all able to recognize the fact that
the only thing Democrats truly excel at is their ability to do nothing other
than to totally fuck up pretty much everything they come in contact with. And then after they have made a complete mess
out of everything it’s somehow that they think they should never bear any of
the responsibility for having made things so much worse than they were before they
started. It really is quite remarkable. However, with that said, what seems to be
even more remarkable is the fact that a near majority of the American people,
and pretty consistently so, seem more than willing to give Democrats a pass. This despite the fact that our country is
being destroyed, quite literally and by Democrat policies, right before our
eyes!
And there is nothing that better proves that point
than taking an up-close and personal look at America's crime-ridden,
impoverished inner cities such as Chicago, Detroit, or any number of other big
cities, that have been Democrat run monopolies for over a half a century. The vast majority of our cities are
experiencing what can only be described as a slow and rather agonizing death. Enter now Marc Lamont Hill, a devoted
Democrat and, hysterically speaking, a Distinguished ‘Professor’ of African
American Studies at Morehouse College in Atlanta, Georgia. They must set the bar pretty low there at
Morehouse. You see, ‘Professor’ Hill
believes Democrats should not be blamed for what has taken place, and continues
to take place, in our rapidly deteriorating cities.
Appearing on the 'Clinton News Network' (CNN) earlier this week to discuss Donald Trump's latest "law and order"
speech which painted a pretty clear picture of how it is that Democrats do
nothing more than to prostitute black communities to gin up votes, former
Secret Service agent Dan Bongino butted heads with ‘Professor’ Hill over why
America's inner cities have been crippled by crime and poverty for what has
been several decades. Mr. Bongino
rightly blamed the Democrats while ‘Professor’ Hill rejected the
assertion. Mr. Bongino said, "These
communities have been driven into the ground." And he went on to say, "Liberalism
correlates with poverty and high crime every single place it's been tried...I
wish I could change it. I wish the Trump campaign could as well."
But ‘Professor’ Hill seemed to take great offense to
Bongino's statement, to the point where he is actually seen wincing at it. He said. “They're Democratic machines but
they're not far left. Michael Nutter was the mayor of Philadelphia. No one
would call him far left. I think that’s a bit extreme. It's not exactly Cuba
there. The other piece of, this and you said you're not a scientist and I’m
glad you said that. There's a difference between correlation and
causality.” He went on to say, “I agree,
there's a connection between these very poor places and Democratic machines,
but being Democrat doesn't cause you to be poor, being liberal doesn’t cause
you to be poor. There's a bunch of top-down policies that enable this to
happen.”
‘Professor’ Hill said, “In a place like Ferguson,
for example, the flight of jobs is far more important, the destruction of
public housing is far more influential than who's the city councilman or who's
the mayor. Although that’s not a black majority. Same thing in Baltimore.” And he added, “Again, we need a new way out,
but the new way out isn't to just crack down on Democrats and bring Republicans
in. We need new policies that bring in jobs, that bring in investment, and that
change the relationship between police and community. That's not a partisan
issue. That’s a much bigger issue.” But
none of the policies which ‘Professor’ Hill says are so badly needed are, in
any way, seen as being policies that Democrats are in favor of.
And exactly who is it that ‘Professor’ Hill thinks
is making those "top-down policies" in those "Democrat
machines"? I mean by using his
rather bizarre logic, the Nazis must not have been responsible for the Holocaust! He literally MADE the argument to bring in
Republicans and didn't even know it.
That's how deluded he is. The
policies are Democrat. The programs are Democrat. The politicians are nearly
ALL Democrat. When you have Democrats
running your schools for 40 years, Democrats running your local law enforcement
for 40 years, Democrats running your city government for 40 years, how is it
that one can make the argument that Democrats did not do this. But then, what else can you expect from the
party of slavery, segregation, Jim Crow and the KKK?
The problem in our cities is that the percentage of
whites dropped while that of the blacks increased. Property values dropped,
businesses closed, those that could, fled, leaving towns and cities husks of
once vibrant places to live and work. As businesses closed and more Section 8
housing increased, property taxes diminished, leaving many cities with serious
shortfalls of cash. The dirty little secret of most of these
Democrat/progressive strongholds is that they are some of the most violent
cities in America. That does not make a
good environment for investment. Black mob violence is an everyday occurrence
in many of these cities, driving away shoppers and then the business owners.
The result is boarded up shops, dead malls and desolate tourist areas, further
exacerbating dismal employment opportunities.
Detroit is the poster child of such progressive
policies with Baltimore and Chicago very close behind. Many more cities like Memphis, Indianapolis,
Oakland, St. Louis, Milwaukee, Madison, Washington, D.C., Wilmington,
Philadelphia are all plagued by black mob violence. Law abiding people can only take so much
crime before they are made to feel, out of fear for their safety and the safety
of their families, that they have no choice but to leave. Every city will tax them to death, yet fail
to clean up the cause of the continuing problems. Again more whites and Asians will move away,
grinding the city down even more as the black population increases in physical
size and percentage of the population placing further and greater strain on
already limited local resources.
Causality or correlation are irrelevant when
Democrats have had 50 years to at least attempt modest improvements, but have,
instead, succeeded in only making matters much worse, and in almost every
way. ‘Professor’ Hill really didn't have
an argument, just words. I think he was going to say "The cities vote
Democrat because they are poor; they are not poor because they vote
Democrat". But after 50 years it
doesn't matter which angle you try and spin this, Democrat policies have failed
and failed miserably. Then he goes on to say that, "Yes, we need new
policies and ideas, but not Republican ones." In other words, there will never be new ideas
because liberals only plan is always to tax and spend and increase regulations,
which IS the main problem.
Here’s a concept that ‘Professor’ Hill and his
leftist comrades might want to explore, how about lowering taxes and removing
regulations allowing black communities to encourage more entrepreneurs who will
then improve their own communities? Or,
how about we stop giving welfare to drug dealers, which then frees them from
having to work, and allows them run around loose 24/7 wreaking all manner of
havoc upon their neighborhoods. These
are Republican fixes, and because Democrats hate Republicans they will never
try anything like this which might actually work, and actually improve the
lives of blacks. So it is impossible to take partisanship out of the equation;
the only way you can get a different outcome is to vote for a different
party. It’s just that simple.
No comments:
Post a Comment