DEMOCRATS, “DO AS I SAY, NOT AS I DO!”…

As I am not someone who makes his living as a political advisor, please excuse my confusion regarding how it is that the Democrats can obtain “information” from foreign nationals with it being nothing more than normal everyday ‘opposition research’, but if the Republicans even speak to a foreigner it’s collusion.  And how is it that no one at the Democratic National Committee (DNC) or among those in charge of Hitlery's campaign, or even the candidate herself, didn't know anything about this “Russian dossier?”  Do they really expect anyone, other than their kooky voter base, to believe that they would spend $8 to $12 Million and not have a clue what it was being used for?  I can understand their idiotic voter base falling for that line of BS, but I would hope that enough of us regular folks still have this thing called commonsense.

Which brings me to this past Sunday’s rather bizarre episode of MSNBC’s “Kasie DC,” during which host Kasie Hunt asked deputy chairman of the DNC, and well-known supporter of the Moslem Brotherhood, Keith Ellison if he thought it was a mistake for the DNC to pay for the so-called Russia dossier manufactured by Fusion GPS about Donald Trump.  Ellison dismissed it as part of the political process in a “modern American election.”  But it is also rather apparent that Ellison is of the opinion that the ONLY candidates that should be permitted to conduct such research are those running for office under the Democrat Party banner.  And what I found as being most remarkable about this entire exchange was the fact that Ellison was able to keep a straight face during the entire thing.  That makes very clear what a skillful liar he is.

And it is a partial transcript of that rather nonsensical exchange that follows:

Ms. Hunt: So, I want to start with the news that we’ve all been focused on this weekend, and that is, of course, the Russia investigation, and what has been unfolding there. And one issue … that Republicans have zeroed in on is the Steele dossier and what we learned from The Washington Post about who paid for that. Now, this happened before you were elected to your position at the DNC but do you think paying for that dossier was a mistake for the party to make?

Jihadi Ellison: You know, opposition research is commonly done by both parties. The real question is, are the statements in the dossier true or are they false? I mean, that’s the real issue. At the end of the day, the findings in that research are things that Trump ought to either deny or and there should be investigations about. That’s the real question. But asking me whether a political party did some background research on a political candidate is like saying, ‘Did you buy lawn signs? Did you buy flyers and literature?’ It’s just part of how campaigns are run in a modern American election.

Now to my way of thinking, manufactured content purchased with the specific intent of smearing one’s political adversary doesn’t exactly fall under the heading of ‘opposition research.’  I see that as being nothing more than a hit job to get someone out of the political picture.  The left doesn’t seem to think that accountability and responsibility apply to them, and they definitely operate under a different set of standards that also seem to be reserve strictly for themselves.  You see, you're not supposed to simply create it out of thin air and you're not supposed to lie, pay for ‘research’ you did not disclose, or pass it on to be used to obtain a FISA warrant to spy on your political opponent.  And this boob, Ellison KNOWS this, and yet he’s out there lying to the American people in an attempt to obfuscate and deceive.

I mean how it is that Donald Trump Jr. going to listen to some Russian who had ‘information’ about Hitlery can be defined as Treason, and yet when Hitlery uses the Russians who supplied a fake dossier in order to sway the American voters to vote for her it was defined as being nothing more than your average, run-of-the-mill ‘opposition research.’  Opposition research is legal. Paying a foreign agent that is working with the Russians to produce ‘fake documents’ to be used as a basis for FISA court warrants on the opposing candidate, not so much.  Ellison is just another liberal hypocrite who simply can’t bring himself to admit what went on here, by the Democrats.  And don't forget, the FBI then went on to use that bogus dossier as their reason to FULLY investigate then president-elect Trump, his family, and campaign staff.

And while I may be wrong about this, though recent events seem to confirm it, I thought elections originally had something to do with having positive reasons to vote for a candidate, not reasons to destroy the other candidate.  Elections used to be about choosing the best candidate, not the mud-spattered survivor of what was nothing more than a political food fight.  And I know that slander, in one form or another, has played a part in virtually every presidential rate since Thomas Jefferson, including Jackson, Lincoln, Goldwater and many others.  But in recent years, that's all it's been about.  I'm trying to recall anything positive in Hitlery’s campaign and I keep coming up empty.  Might that have been the real reason, or at least one of them, why she lost a contest to someone who was a complete outsider?

And finally, are John Podesta, Fusion GPS and other political attack dogs really how we want to go about choosing our national leaders?  And let’s not forget that for 12 months, George Stephanopoulos, Jake Tapper, Chuck Todd, and the other ‘Globalist Media’ whores at CNN, ABC, CBS, and NBC have paralyzed America, demanding the impeachment of Trump for imaginary collusion with Russia.  We now know Hitlery, the DNC and Comey's FBI colluded with Russia, paying $12M for Russian spies to produce lies about Trump for the sole purpose of effecting the election, and since, to paralyze Trump's agenda, and to overthrow democracy with their 12 month campaign to impeach Trump.  Now the same bunch at CNN, ABC, CBS, and NBC insist Russian interference in America's elections is standard ‘opposition research?’

JEFF FLAKE MAKES NOISE ABOUT RUNNING AS AN INDEPENDENT…

Nothing makes it more clear, when it comes to just how much of a RINO fraud Jeff Flake of Arizona is than the recent news that he is at least now considering running for his seat as an Independent by giving his blessing to an outside organization to conduct polling to explore just such a possibility.  I’m sure everyone remembers when Flake announced last Tuesday that he would not be seeking re-election to a second Senate term next year in light of his dire chances of winning a Republican primary and his frustration with the tenure of President Donald Trump.  Polling showed him trailing his insurgent challenger, Kelli Ward, by double digits.  But now Flake has come up with what he sees as being a Plan B that would likely result in nothing more than to hand the seat to the Democrats.  Which is apparently his preference.

The Centrist Project, which is a group created to recruit independent candidates, apparently approached Flake about running outside the dominant two-party system during a meeting this past Friday.  The senator signaled he was open to the possibility and was interested in what polling would show. A spokesperson for Flake did not respond to an inquiry.  After initial publication of this story, the senator tweeted that an independent run is “not gonna happen.”  Flake tweeted, “I subscribe to the old saw Running as an Independent is the future ... and will always be the future.” And he continued shortly afterward with another post saying, “I am a conservative and a Republican. This fever will someday break and we can rebuild our party once more.”  Personally, I would not trust this guy as far as I could throw him.  

The Centrist Project is planning to poll Flake's chances as an independent in a three-way race this week.  While Flake is skeptical about the feasibility of an independent run, the source says, he indicated he was open to the idea if he's provided a viable path to victory. Since Flake's announcement last week, a segment of Republican and Independent-leaning donors also have been encouraging the option.  The source attributed Flake's public disinterest in an independent run to public pressure from Republicans.  Joel Searby, a strategist for The Centrist Project said, “Donors and like-minded Americans who care about a functioning democracy are realizing they're going to have to look to new options as party primaries continue to not only encourage but essentially guarantee the most extreme candidates.”

Searby added, “In the case of Jeff Flake, people from both the center-right and center-left realize that they can basically have whichever most extreme Republican emerges from the primary or, as an independent, a level-headed, principled Jeff Flake. When they start thinking in those terms, they begin to realize it's time for reconsidering the old ways.”  And if Flake should launch such a bid, it would further complicate what's already expected to be a highly competitive race.  While Ward has been in the contest for a year, White House aides, leery about her candidacy, have been looking for alternatives.  GOP Rep. Martha McSally made members of the Arizona congressional delegation aware she’s weighing entering the contest, and Jay Heiler, a member of the Arizona Board of Regents, has formed an exploratory committee.

Meanwhile Democrat Rep. Kyrsten Sinema is already in the race and is not expected to face a difficult primary which means that she be able to horde whatever money will predictably be coming her way from all across the country.  You see, this is the way these scumbag RINOs like Flake operate.  They’re never stratified to simply take their ball and go home.  They always feel compelled to take things a step or two beyond that, hoping to inflict as much damage as they can against the team who saw fit to remove them from their ranks.  Because it must always be made to be about them and not, as it was this case, being about what’s best for our country.  They don’t care about what’s best for the country, only about what’s best from them.  Flake learned that lesson very well from his presumed mentor, John McCain.

CHRIS WALLACE ADMITS EVIDENCE OF COLLUSION POINTS TO HITLERY…

Anyone who has spent any amount of time over the years watching Chris Wallace knows how much it must have pained him to say, this Friday on Fox News, that there is “more evidence at this point of Democratic collusion with the Russians” than with Republicans.  How difficult must it have been for poor old Chris Wallace to have to finally admit that the Democrats possess significant blame in this continuing horror show, and essentially admit that Trump has been right all along!  Wallace said, “Obviously the revelations about Hillary Clinton and the Democrats and the Clinton campaign buying or funding that Russian dossier certainly blunts a lot of the efforts to talk about Trump collusion and then the victory yesterday on passing the budget.”

And he continued, “I will say these are short-term victories for the president, but their long-term impact is still to be determined. Let me explain both. On the one hand, the fact that Hillary Clinton or at least her campaign and the DNC was doing business with a foreign national, a British spy to get information from the Russians for this dossier certainly blunts the idea ‘Well, it was the Trump campaign and it was outrageous the Trump campaign had anything to do with the Russians to maybe effect at the election’ because this is far more evidence we’ve ever seen involving President Trump and his campaign that the Democrats were directly involved in trying to get information from the Russians to affect the 2016 campaign.”

And then he went on to add, “Having said that we still don’t know about Robert Mueller, the investigation. Both things could be true that both sides were trying to get aid from a Russians and it seems true the Russians were playing both sides to try to disrupt the election. We have to wait and see. But there is more evidence at this point of Democratic collusion with the Russians than there is Republican collusion with the Russians.”  Oh the horror of colluding with the Russians!  How many Sundays has Mr. Sunday spent on this, trying to discredit our President!  I no longer listen to him, just the wrong way to start a beautiful Sunday morning.  Never listened to him much anyway.  He’s disgusting and he owes Trump an apology!!!!

And I think it’s important to keep in mind that Chris is the guy man who asked the question at the end of the last debate about whether or not Trump would accept the election results. You know, the one that Megyn Kelly and the state-controlled media jumped on as if it had been planned, with it being all they talked about for days.  And it would seem that after watching how things have now played out, I would argue that he asked the wrong candidate that question.  Because it’s been Hitlery who, after nearly a year, still hasn't accepted the election results.  And it is she who is doing far more harm to our “democracy” than anything the Russians have done.  Chris is just another pathological liar, albeit one who is paid to do what it is that comes so naturally.

Chris has always been a willing stooge happy to do the bidding of ‘The Establishment.'  He now finds himself in an uncomfortable position of having to adapt a new narrative if he wishes to remain credible.  Continuing to report on the allegations Trump colluded with the Russians is not only disingenuous, it’s dishonest. The truth is, there’s NO evidence whatsoever that Trump, his campaign staff or his family colluded with the Russians to sabotage our election process or Hitlery's campaign. Alternatively, indisputable evidence has emerged implicating Hitlery, her surrogates and the DNC in colluding with the Russians during the campaign.  Now we need to determine what crimes were committed and whether our system of justice applies to all.

You're disgusting Mr. Wallace.  And you’re about as far removed from being a journalist as you could possibly be. You’re just another stooge willing to the bidding of those on the Left, always willing to dance to whatever tune they play.  Hitlery was arrogant and narcissistic, she thought she deserved to be president, and therefore saw no need to waste time and money going to those states where she was the weakest.  She believed what the polls were saying, that she had the 270 electoral votes she needed to win despite all her lying, corruption and an unwillingness to meet with the media until forced.  And yet she was surprised, even shocked, when she lost.  And there you were Chris, ever ready to defend her to the American people.

I mean when it comes to colluding with the Russians, it’s what Democrats have always done.  They colluded with the Russians all through the Cold War, Obummer plotted to stop missile defense, and substantially reduced America’s nuclear warhead inventory.  But then again, it’s the media that owns the mic, so it can highlight whatever it wants, and that usually means not publicizing news damaging to the liberal cause. The Democrats were crazy to run Hitlery.  Not because she is a bad politician, she isn't.  She can debate and lie with the best of them. They were crazy to overlook how scandal prone she is.  She doesn't just bend the rules and laws. She breaks them, stomps on them and burns them to a crisp! And the Democrats knew that!

But I suppose we shouldn’t be too hard on them.  After all, I’m sure they figured that as long as they had those in the media, like Wallace, firmly in their back pocket they’d be able to successfully navigate through all of the scandals and come out on top.  Because, after all, how difficult was it really going to be to defeat someone like Trump.  They were convinced that after 2008 and 2012 that the media was their ace in the hole.  But it would come to pass that Wallace and his many colleagues in the state-controlled media, despite the countless number of bogus polls showing Hiltery was unstoppable, simply weren’t able to drag Hitlery across the finish line.  And now Wallace and his friends are in danger of having to eat more than a little crow.

WHEN DEMOCRATS PRACTICE TO DECEIVE…

What it is about those in charge of the Democrat Party and a lack of possessing even a most rudimentary understanding of our Constitution?  I mean do they really not understand what it says, or is there something a bit more sinister underway here?  For instance, do they truly possess no understanding of it, or are they simply betting on the fact that those who tend to vote for Democrats don’t understand it or even know what it is.  Personally, I’m thinking that those in charge of the party have a pretty good grasp on what it is that our Constitution says, and they’re pretty confident that the vast majority of those who proudly vote for Democrats haven’t got a clue.  And that’s how those in charge prefer it.   

Which brings me to another example of where we have a high ranking member in the Democrat Party attempting to take advantage of that significant ignorance regarding our Constitution.  Now I’m sure most of us are aware that genuine American History is very rarely taught in our public schools today.  And dare I say that there is a specific reason for this.  Because if the true history of our nation was actually taught then it would be common knowledge that the Electoral College has a purpose and was established by our Founding Fathers, in the Constitution, as a compromise between election of the President by a vote in Congress and election of the President by a popular vote of qualified citizens.

Frankly, I can’t remember another time in my sixty five years of being on this planet where I've ever seen such a dedicated and concerted effort by those in the Democrat Party to convince their followers that the Electoral College is nothing more than something dreamt to somehow rig the system against them.  The most recent attempt came from none other than Democratic National Committee chairman Tom Perez who falsely claimed, yet again, that the Electoral College is not “a creation of the Constitution.”  During a lecture at Indiana University Law School, Perez said the Electoral College “doesn’t have to be there,” asserting that the national popular vote should be the principal standard.

And it was in lying through his teeth that Perez said, “The Electoral College is not a creation of the Constitution. It doesn’t have to be there.”  And he went on to say, “There’s a national popular vote compact in which a number of states have passed a bill that says we will allocate our vote, our electoral votes, to the person who wins the national popular vote once other states totaling 270 electoral votes do the same.”  You know, it’s the fact that he knows he’s lying is what makes his actions all the more disgusting and, dare I say, even more than just a little sinister.  But this is the type of behavior that we have now come to expect from those in charge of the Democrat Party and others one the left.

Perez’s claim that the U.S. Constitution is not a part of the Electoral College is, however, completely false and he knows it.  Because he knows as well as the rest of us that Article II clearly outlines the electoral process, dictating that states must appoint electors who meet and vote for the president.  Article II very clearly states, “Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors, equal to the whole Number of Senators and Representatives to which the State may be entitled in the Congress: but no Senator or Representative, or Person holding an Office of Trust or Profit under the United States, shall be appointed an Elector.”  Pretty cut and dry.

Perez has made statements in the past implying that that President Donald Trump actually “didn’t win” the 2016 presidential election because Hiterly won the popular vote.  That’s just one of the many reasons that I have such a difficult time taking anyone in the Democrat Party seriously.  Because they’re nothing but a pack of unprincipled liars.  You can’t tell me that Perez actually believes any of the shit that is constantly coming out of his mouth.  And yet he’s hoping that those to whom he is speaking, will.  And it’s obvious that many of them do, which only encourages losers like Perez to spew even more of their rather toxic and blatantly incendiary rhetoric adding to our era of political incivility.  

Look, the Founding Fathers created the Constitution, which was then approved by the people, and it’s the Constitution that makes very clear the purpose of the Electoral College and the role state legislatures play in shaping it.  Where Perez practices to deceive is when he pretends not to know that every election we have ever had has been won by the candidate with the most Electoral College votes, regardless of popular vote.  Hitlery lost in the very same fashion as has every presidential election loser that came before her, and Trump won the election in the very same way that every other presidential candidate won.  If Perez wants to change the way candidates win the presidency, there’s a process.

Nothing known to us thus far would change how the outcome of the last election was arrived at, Donald J. Trump is the constitutionally elected president of these United States.  And it’s only those afflicted with Trump Acceptance Resistance Disorder, or (TARD), which apparently includes Perez, who refuse to accept that fact.  For those unfamiliar, TARD is a pattern of pathologically dissociative and psychotic behavior, first observed in the late hours of November 8, 2016, and seems only to have increased in severity ever since.  Those afflicted with TARD often exhibit a rather pronounced cognitive dissonance, sudden bouts of rage, uncontrollable crying, suicidal ideation, and extreme butt-hurt.

Typically, those diagnosed with TARD are characterized by the possessing of a persistent unwillingness to accept that Donald Trump is going to “Make America Great Again,” and an overwhelming need to say just about anything in an effort to undermine, discredit or delegitimize our duly elected president.  Individual sufferers can be expected to display signs of paranoia and delusion; and in acute cases psychotic episodes have been observed.  Those afflicted go beyond being simply upset about the results of the 2016 presidential election, it’s those afflicted with TARD who are either completely unwilling or unable to accept reality, and very stubbornly so, despite irrefutable evidence.

And when it comes to those afflicted with this condition, the only known treatment that can be said to be in any way effective is regular exposure to some sort of psychiatric therapy.  The patient must be repeatedly exposed to heavy doses of political reality, and should be made to wear a “Make America Great Again” hat for as long as they are able to tolerate it, with each exposure increasing in length.  And it should be after no less than a week that the patient should be encouraged to be seen in public wearing the ‘MAGA’ hat.  And ultimately, the goal should be to get the patient to where they are comfortable wearing the ‘MAGA’ hat 24/7 without experiencing any outbursts of ‘NeverTrumpisms.’

Be aware that patients with TARD are typically very resistant to any form of treatment, and should always be considered as being rather dangerous whenever they are present in large groups (usually any number over 5).  Any possibility of treatment requires that they be separated from their hive-mind support apparatus since they cannot begin the process of accepting reality in the presence of encouragement towards delusion and irrationality.  Separation may require the assistance of law enforcement.  And if you have a friend or loved one who is suffering from TARD, urge them to seek treatment.  We must help those who can’t help themselves, and together we can beat this scourge, TARD.

But seriously folks, all joking aside, I can’t help but wonder just how many people actually understand all of the unintended consequences that would go along with the Electoral College being made to go away.  Now granted, the Democrats’ wish to scrap it notwithstanding, we're still a very long way from abolishing it, courtesy of a Constitutional amendment.  But people need to be made to realize that if that were to ever happen the nation would essentially end up being run by little more than a hand full of states, all of which are of the very deepest shade of blue.  And why should the folks of, say, Nebraska be left to have what would essentially be no say in who it is that would be elected president?

Or to put it in such a way that even those in the Democrat Party can understand, there are 3,141 counties in America.  Donald Trump won 3,084 of them and Hitlery won only 57.  It would be ludicrous to suggest that the vote of those who encompass a mere 57 counties should dictate the outcome of a national election.  And yet we still have to listen to morons like Perez who continue to harp on the fact that because Hitlery won the popular vote, it’s she who should now be our president.  Why should I, as one who lives in one of those 3,084 countries that Trump won be forced to live in a country shaped by those who live in the 57 counties that Hitlery won?  Come on people, this ain’t rocket science.  

REPUBLICAN COLLUSION, EQUALS DEMOCRAT OPPOSITION RESEARCH???

Why is it that we allow the Democrats to get away with describing what the Trump campaign was supposedly involved in during the last campaign as collusion, and what we’re now finding out that Hitlery’s campaign was involved in as harmless ‘opposition research?’  You simply cannot make this shit up!  And do the Democrats really think that a majority of the American people are that stupid?  Now I will admit that in order for one to willingly vote Democrat one also has to be a borderline retard.  There’s no other conclusion you can come to.  And it’s in providing one more bit of evidence to support my premise that I present to you, Democrat Adam Schiff.  Mr. Schiff, you may recall, has been one of the more vocal accusers of collusion, beginning practically on the day after the election.  But it was this past Tuesday, while appearing on MSNBC’s “Rachel Maddow Show”, that Schiff, the Ranking Member on the House Intelligence Committee, reacted to a report that Hitlery’s campaign and the DNC helped fund the research that resulted in the Christopher Steele dossier, saying it doesn’t really add much to the Russia investigation and is “part of the effort to discredit” Steele.  So according to Schiff, ‘there is simply no there, there.’

Schiff stated, “We’ve known for some time, at least it’s been publicly reported, that the dossier, or the hiring of Christopher Steele was initially on behalf of one of the Republican candidates, and later on behalf of the Democratic candidate. This was the first confirmation of half of that, but it doesn’t really shed any light where we really need light shed, and that is how much of what Mr. Steele found can be corroborated? How much of it is accurate? We’ve been working hard to answer those questions, which are really what the American people need to know. And, indeed, some of the dossier has been corroborated. What I find most significant about it is the fact that Christopher Steele, no matter who was paying for his services, may have discovered, before our own intelligence agencies that the Russians were going to interfere in our election on behalf of Donald Trump. So, we have a lot of work to do in terms of a lot of the claims in the dossier, but it — I don’t think it really adds much value to know who paid for it, necessarily, and I view this as part of the effort to discredit him, which really doesn’t advance the investigation.”  Nope, there’s nothing to see here folks, nothing at all, just move along.  

And Schiff went on to say, “Republicans are less interested in what did Russia do and how did they do it and how do we protect ourselves? But rather, let’s shift the focus onto any kind of government misbehavior, and maybe if we can suggest that the whole investigation goes back to this dossier and this dossier was opposition research, maybe we can discredit the whole investigation and maybe we can get the country to ignore what Russia, in fact, did. You know, the plain fact is, sometimes what is uncovered in opposition research turns out to be true. And here, if what Christopher Steele found, whether it was working for a Republican candidate and a Democratic candidate later, proved to be true, proved to be of concern to the FBI and to the country, then we need to know it, and we can’t ignore it merely because it came to the surface during a political campaign. So the most important thing is, is it true?”  I’m sensing a bit of desperation on the part of Mr. Schiff.  These guys had to have known that once the digging started they’d have more to worry about than President Trump would.  I can only assume that they thought it a risk worth taking.  Or, was it seen as a way to finally rid themselves of the Clintons? 

And then on Wednesday, also on MSNBC, this time appearing on “Andrea Mitchell Reports,” Schiff accused the Trump administration, Breitbart News and Fox News of all being in cahoots in the promoting of news that was first reported by The Hill last week regarding Hitlery’s involvement in the ‘Uranium One’ deal.  The 2010 deal, covered extensively in Breitbart editor-at-large Peter Schweizer’s book “Clinton Cash: The Untold Story of How and Why Foreign Governments and Businesses Helped Make Bill and Hillary Rich,” that gave Russia control of a significant portion of U.S. uranium.  Schiff again denounced the new attention as a “partisan effort to distract” and accused House Speaker Paul Ryan of being a part of it given three House committees — Judiciary, Government Reform and Intelligence — were involved.  Schiff said, “[T]his had to be orchestrated with the approval of the Speaker of the House.”  And added, “So this is a partisan effort to distract. It’s a partisan effort aligned with what the White House has been urging, and Fox and Breitbart, and which there was no consultation with the Democrats in Congress. And I think that tells you all need to know about whether this is good faith or not.”

Look, ever since Hitlery lost the election Democrats have felt compelled to come up with some sort of an excuse for why it happened.  And there is absolutely no way that they’re going admit, to themselves or anyone else, that she was the worst possible candidate not only to ever run for president, but for any public office.  And then there’s the fact that she was never able to credibly articulate why it was she wanted the job in the first place, other than because it was simply her turn.  That’s why she lost, there was nothing nefarious going on.  And let’s not forget the fact that she was a candidate who ran on a bad platform, and whose campaign was incompetent when faced with someone whose message resonated with many that the Democrats took for granted (or simply flat out ignored).  So they chose to run with the idea that the Russians must have stolen the election for Trump.  They are trying so very hard to spin this as, “Well it doesn't matter whether or not Steele was being honest, the Dossier is still true.”  They had zero proof that any of it was true.  And where is the proof we’ve been waiting for, for over a year?  Yet we have plenty of proof of Hitlery trying to subvert the election and sabotage the political system.

I must admit that when I went to bed on election night I did so ‘knowing’ that I would be waking up to President Hitlery.  And I still remember turning on the television the next morning and seeing ‘President’ Trump thanking all those who had supported and voted for him.  I thought it amazing that Trump had been elected in spite of all the obstacles that he had to overcome.  There was the ‘The Establishment’ Republicans, the Democrat Party and the state-controlled media, who had essentially combined forces in an effort to make sure Hitlery won.  But, as it turned out, it was all for naught.  Can you imagine the shock they must have all felt?  So the only logical next step, at least from their perspective was to do all they could to create the perception that Trump must have somehow cheated because, after all, how else could this outsider have defeated the most qualified person, male or female, to have ever run for president.  But what they seem to have overlooked, for one reason or another, is the fact that Hitlery was also the most corrupt individual to ever run for president.  And when you start defending such a person, you run the risk of having things exposed that might not necessarily work to your advantage.

Even with everything that now seems to be coming to light, I seriously doubt that old Hitlery will spend day one behind bars.  This despite the fact that the Democrats have essentially been caught red-handed.  But they don't care, they’ve got no reason to worry, yet.  Their defenders in the state-controlled media, of which there are many, will now go into overdrive, pulling out every stop imaginable in their effort to defend she who was “the most qualified candidate” ever.  ‘The Establishment’ thought they could do whatever they wanted with impunity, as if we hadn't been paying attention for the last 8, 12 or 25 years.  They all thought it was ‘MISSION ACCOMPLISHED!”  But a funny thing happened on the way to Election Day because we had been paying attention.  We knew what they have been up to.  They chose to suppress our voice, and chose to cast us aside as ‘deplorables’, not worthy of their attention.  Might they be paying attention to us now?  Democrats like Schiff are a rather amusing bunch, with their theories about some “vast right-wing conspiracy” that doesn't exist.  The only “conspiracy” that I know of was hatched exclusively by the Democrats, a pack of rabid liars, and cheats, the whole lot of them.

It’s quite impressive the number of people who are willing to lie and even to perjure themselves in their defense of Hitlery.  And you really do have to wonder about people who can be so easily duped by someone who is so very obviously corrupt.  And while it would be somewhat gratifying to finally see something done to right the enormous number of wrongs perpetrated upon our country by these two grifters, the Clintons, wrongs committed for no other reason than to amass for themselves as much wealth as possible and enough political power to keep those wrongs forever buried, it’s doubtful that either of these two will ever be made to answer for any of the many crimes they have committed, nor the number of lives they have placed in jeopardy.  And to believe that these two have, in any way, been great public servants goes beyond being simply naïve.  They have long been the albatross around the neck of the Democrat Party and yet we have those like Mr. Schiff who stubbornly refuse to accept what the rest of us have known for a very long time.  That Hitlery and ‘Slick Willy’ will forever be nothing more than the equivalent of a stain on a blue dress regarding their place in the history of American politics.

JEFF FLAKE…SEE YA, WOULDN’T WANT TO BE YA…

Granted we still have a very long way to go but with Jeff Flake now following closely behind Bob Corker in heading toward the exit, it would seem that ‘The Swamp’ may actually be self-draining.  But what strikes me as being a little odd about Flake’s departure is that here we have a guy with an 18 percent approval rating back home and who has been a ‘NeverTrumper’ practically since day one, suffering from what can only be described as delusions of grandeur the likes of which we haven’t seen since ‘Crazy Uncle John’ Kasich ran for president.  And why I say that is because when asked, just today, about his possible future intentions, Flake repeatedly refused to rule out a potential bid against President Donald Trump in the 2020 presidential election.  What the Hell is this guy smokin’?

You see, it was when asked if he will run for president in 2020 that Flake told the folks on ABC’s “This Morning”: “That’s a long way away. I’m focused on my next 14 months in the Senate, making sure that we get some good policy, there are some things that I want to accomplish in the short term.”  Flake, you’ll recall, announced Tuesday afternoon that he does not intend to seek re-election in 2018, choosing instead to join his fellow RINO in the Senate, Bob Corker, as both head toward the door.  Flake was widely considered one of the most vulnerable Senate Republicans, if not the most vulnerable, up for re-election.  And like I said, he has been a rather outspoken and very vocal critic of President Trump, but he also hasn’t got much support from the voters of Arizona. 

And also it was in a telephone interview with ‘The Arizona Republic’ that Flake said, “Here’s the bottom line: The path that I would have to travel to get the Republican nomination is a path I’m not willing to take, and that I can’t in good conscience take.”  And he went on to say, “It would require me to believe in positions I don’t hold on such issues as trade and immigration and it would require me to condone behavior that I cannot condone.”  The Arizona senator did not respond again when asked if he will take on President Trump in the next presidential election cycle, saying, “you know, that’s a long time away. And we’ll deal with that when it comes to it.”  I guess I don’t understand what would make someone who can’t even win in his own state think they could win nationally.

I think it’s fair to say Flake and Corker were but two of those on ‘our side’ who were fully expecting, maybe even hoping, that Hitlery would win the election last November, and when she didn’t they were still confident that once candidate Trump was sworn in all of his campaign rhetoric would conveniently go out the window and he would revert to the old Washington RINO two step and dance right along with them.  But instead President Trump has ended up dancing on their political graves.  I suspect that Democrats are terribly disappointed that Flake won’t be running.  The fact that he was seen as being vulnerable, I’m sure, had them with visions of adding that seat to their caucus.  They will now face an uphill battle.  Better for Republicans to have a new candidate rather than a disliked incumbent.

So now with them heading toward the door, and I’m sure we can expect to soon see both of these losers making the rounds to all of the leftwing news shows.  And I’m pretty sure we won’t be hearing them admit how it is that for the first time we have in Trump someone who gives it better than he gets it.  Why do you think all of the ad hominem attacks both the Republicans and the Democrats failed to put a dent in first candidate, and then in President Trump?  Far from criticizing the continuing stream of vile filthy attacks against the president that came, and continue to come, from those on the left, Flake and Corker, along with McCain and a few other RINOs, simply chose to join in.  And then they have the nerve to act offended when the president fires back at them.  What exactly did they expect?  

Look, then candidate Trump beat 16 contenders to gain the nomination before going on to beat Hitlery despite having the entire Democrat Party, 99 percent of the state-controlled media and over half of the Republican Party all waging war on him.  I think the only way Flake would have a chance of beating President Trump would be if Trump decided not to seek reelection. “Rough around the edges” doesn't begin to define Trump, but as I heard someone say on some show, we need to focus more on what’s being accomplished than on the words being used.  The people support the policy changes Trump espouses and will doggedly support him against what has largely been unprincipled and disingenuous attacks.  If given a choice, most of us would rather have him in our corner than the Washington insiders.

And it was also a bit disingenuous of Flake to imply that we who support the president are somehow demanding of him complete and unquestionable loyalty to the president.  Because that’s not the case at all.  All we are asking for is for there to be some level acceptance, from members of his own party, of the man who was duly elected president.  And it is that that men like Flake, Corker and McCain simply can’t bring themselves to do.  And why is that?  Many of us think it’s because these men, and the many others like them, long ago forgot why it was they were elected to serve in the first place.  It was not to allow them a way to enrich themselves, or to simply do the bidding of their wealthy donors, it was to fairly represent the people, all the people.  And that is what seems to have been forgotten. 

And, it is that that has finally become completely and totally unacceptable.  It seems that these men expect loyal long standing conservatives to believe that they remain the few politicians still roaming the Earth that are without blemish.  While I do not always endorse the style of President Trump, you certainly can make the argument that at least some of his tweets do have merit.  And while I would most certainly prefer an end to all of the bickering, there are those who seem interested in doing nothing more than to fight with Trump over those issues on which he ran and, quite frankly got him elected.  And at least for the time being I’m content to remain a steadfast support of his, rather than of those who prefer to bicker.  Because it is Trump who is still willing to listen to the forgotten working class in America.

It’s Flake and the many other immigration happy global corporate elites who could care less.  Flake seems to care little that we are losing America.  Over 30% of families in his home state now speak languages other than English at home.  In the state just to the west that number is 45%.  Language is central to unifying a culture.  The rich have prospered in the last 20+ years while wages have been stagnant for most of the middle class.  Unemployment is still at record levels among those that have to compete with cheap illegal foreign labor.  Long before Trump made it to Washington Flake and his buddies stood by and watched as Obummer used extra constitutional methods to sell out American interests here and abroad.  Where was this precious voice of opposition then?

Mr. Flake, I have no reason to believe you anything but a decent man. You were given the unbelievable privilege of representing the good people of the great state of Arizona in the Senate of the United States.  But that said, it does not give you the right to judge me or my motives for choosing to support Mr. Trump.  I am every bit the American you claim to be.  I will be glad to see you leave ‘The Swamp.’  I have a difficult time respecting a person who only quit because it was a less embarrassing option than the total shellacking you were about to get.  You say that it was because the President was tarnishing politics.  If he is, he borrowed the brush from you and those like you.  If Trump is the disaster that you claim that he is, you would switch parties and join with the impeachment crowd.

And it’s in all likelihood that by next week most of us will have forgotten Flake’s rather sorry attempt at a resignation speech, but that likely won’t stop the ‘Crappy News Network’ (CNN) from trying to get a temporary ratings boost out of it.  One of the oddest things about the coverage of Flake’s resignation is how those in the state-controlled media tried to spin it as being a loss for the president.  A prominent critic of Trump deciding to leave office doesn’t exactly sound like much of a loss, no matter how many lame barbs Flake lobbed in his direction during his “defiant” surrender.  Flake’s resignation is the epitome of a trend that began when Trump first secured his party’s nomination for president and that now has various conservatives melodramatically announcing their exit from the Republican Party.

The main attack against Trump in the primary was that he was not a conservative. That had little effect on voters.  There is also nothing in the arguments of these disaffected Republicans to win over the party’s base.  Unrestricted free trade means their jobs can easily be shipped overseas.  Open borders means they have no say on who is allowed to come into this country and their communities.  More foreign interventions mean their children have to bear the cost for the grand schemes of think tank warriors.  These stances win disingenuous praise from liberals, but they’re not going to win elections.  It is abundantly clear that the average Republican cares more about the culture war than they do about the Export-Import bank and other obscure issues that only folks like Flake care about.

Lastly, it was on my way home from work last night that I happened to be listening to Fox’s ‘The Five’ when the subject of Republicans who oppose the president came up.  And it was Juan ‘Dumb As A Brick’ Williams who, in trying very hard to make his point, brought up how it’s members of his own party that are attacking President Trump.  Of course those who Juan was busy quoting were Flake, Corker and McCain.  While I guess you can call these guys Republicans if for no other reason than because they are always listed with an (R) after their name, most see them as RINOs.  And if quoting these guys is the best old Juan can do in trying to make his point, he’s not going to get very far by using creatures from ‘The Swamp’ when trying to make his case against Trump to those folks outside the beltway.

FREDERICA WILSON, AND THE CONTINUING SAGA OF A PARASITE RODEO CLOWN…

Yes, I know I said that I was through talking about this racist bitch.  That the horse had officially been pronounced as dead.  But that was before she insisted upon breathing new life into said dead horse, yet again.  And it was also before she chose to once again shoot off her big mouth this past Sunday, this time on MS(LSD)’s “AM Joy.”  It was then, while discussing with the show’s blatantly racist host Joy-Ann Reid the disputed phone call President Donald Trump made to Sgt. La David Johnson’s widow, that Wilson said General John Kelly owed her an apology for his “character assassination.”  You see, in making what was seen by many as being the most appropriate analogy in discussing Wilson, the General said that is always empty barrels that make the most noise.  And if Wilson is anything, it’s an empty barrel.  And I’m more than a little confused about why it is that she views the General’s statement as “character assassination.” 

Wilson said, “John Kelly is almost —I guess you could say he was a puppet of the president and what he was trying to do was divert the attention away from the president on to me, and he basically just lied on me. I don’t appreciate people lying on me. And that’s what he did. I have been in politics a long time, and most things don’t bother me, you know, it just rolls off my back. I have been lied on before, but the character assassination that he went through to call me out of my name, an empty barrel and all the work that I’ve done in this community —not only does he owe me an apology, but he owes an apology to the American people, because when he lied on me, he lied to them. I don’t think that is fair I think it is wrong.”  She added, “Yes, he does owe the American people an apology for lying on one of their congresswomen.”  It’s only someone who is so very clearly pathological could arrive at such a bizarre conclusion.

Now I will admit that I am not someone who is able to think quite like Ms. Wilson does, and for two very important reasons.  For one thing, I’m not black, but there are those days when I actually wish I was.  Think about it, if you’re black you’re not responsible for ANYTHING, least of all your bad behavior, you don’t need great grades to get into college, and once you do get a job it’s damn near impossible to fire you because of your boss’s fear of being called a racist.  Also you get to go on random shopping sprees every time some black thug gets himself shot by a white police officer, taking the opportunity to grab that fancy pair of sneakers or that flat screen television you’ve been admiring, all with basically no fear of being arrested even if they get your face on camera.  And for another thing, I’m not a Democrat.  Which is something I thank God for every single day.  Because most of those who proudly call themselves Democrats are dumb as bricks. 

I tend to think that the Democrats may have not only opened up a real can of worms here, but they may have also proceeded to then kick over that can of worms.  Because it’s in having Ms. Wilson, and any number of other Democrats, serving as their rather stellar example, that the Democrats’ base has now seemed to have lost complete control of what few manners they may at one time actually possessed as well as whatever limited sense of protocol they may have once had.  For the Democrats to address the incivility and boorish actions from the elements within their own base would require them to take a hard and unpopular stand.  And as we all know, Democrat politicians are unlikely to do anything that might endanger their fragile cobbled together coalition of various voting blocs.  Maybe that's why they keep doubling down on identity politics, because they’re too far gone. There is no way to put the genie back in the bottle.

It's much the same sort of predicament that many of those in our state-controlled media now find themselves.  It would seem that they have now cast aside all manner of journalistic norms and have instead turned into full-blown liberal activists.  And things have now progressed so very far that I seriously doubt that there would be any possible way for them to ever get things turned back around.  Now I suppose, however unlikely, that they could all start being completely truthful and unbiased tomorrow, but even at that the vast majority of people still wouldn't trust them to be telling the truth because they’ve been conditioned to believe that they’re being lied to.  Things have now progressed that far.  And they have no one to blame but themselves.  The media’s death spiral, that began decades ago, increased quite significantly back in 2007/8 in both speed and trajectory, and things have only gotten much worse since then.  But I digress. 

In getting back to Ms. Wilson, I’d be dying to know if anyone else has noticed how it is that this congresswoman seems to have a rather difficult time when it comes to her being able to string enough words together to make both a complete and coherent statement, or to her being able to speak proper English.  How is that she is able to get away with speaking her own language?  I mean what exactly does the phase “lying on me?”, mean?  And what the hell does “call me out of my name” mean?  Where was it that she may have been educated?  And it would seem that in Ms. Wilson is yet another viable argument against Affirmative Action.  Or, does she speak in such a way in order to make herself appear more like her homies back in her district so they keep re-electing her?  Either way, while she may come across well to those in her district, it’s to millions of other Americans that she tends to come across as being little more than a cartoon character. 

It continues to become increasingly difficult to take this clown seriously. But I can only guess that she must possess that which her constituents look for in a candidate.  And I’m also of the opinion that if there is anyone in need of having to apologize, it would be Ms. Wilson.  She should apologize to all of us for lying to America and inciting hatred for our President.  And I can’t help but wonder what happened to the giddy Congresswoman Wilson who, not long ago, was joyously celebrating her new "rock star" status after General Kelly’s smackdown.  I guess she finally realized how effective and incredibly revealing General Kelly's truthful “empty barrel” comments about her really were.  No one should have to apologize for telling the truth. The truth often hurts those who work to avoid it most of their lives.  A battle between a seasoned dedicated patriot and an “empty barrel” is not a fair fight but it is a gratifying one to watch.

Look, let’s be very clear here, shall we.  At this point the only thing that General Kelly, the American people, and even the Black community owe Ms. Wilson is nothing more than a nice, safe padded cell somewhere.  This women is so transparent she makes me sick to my stomach.  Because it was while she was traipsing around bragging about being a ‘rock star’ that the young man who was supposed to be the focus of her outrage was being placed in the ground.  If that doesn’t prove the point that he was serving as little more than a prop to be used against the president, nothing will.  Because the color of his skin shouldn’t matter, the only thing that should matter is that he died in the defense of his country.  And keep in mind, that this clown was one of the 70 other Democrat clowns who chose to boycott President Trump’s inauguration.  Wilson, like so many others in her party, is nothing more than a hater, a hater to the extreme.   

JOHN MCCAIN A ‘WAR HERO?’ NOT SO MUCH!!!

First let me start by saying that I did not go to Vietnam.  My number was 342 in the draft lottery, the only lottery that I view myself as ever having won.  I did, however lose a friend in the war, as many of us no doubt did.  Those who chose to go, or those who were drafted, came back in flag draped coffin or with nightmares I’m sure they suffer to this day.  I doubt any came back as the same person they were upon their arrival to the war zone.  And then you also had those men who were captured as well as those who were able to finagle for themselves a shorter than average tour while garnering more than a few medals for themselves along the way.

My focus here will be on one of those men who were captured and who, upon his release from captivity, would be sent home where he, after eventually leaving active duty would go on to enjoy, courtesy of a manufactured reputation as a war hero, a successful, and very lucrative, career in the U.S. Senate.  And it’s this very same man who, to this day, still fancies himself a ‘war hero’ for doing little more than to get himself shot down over enemy territory.  A man who retired from the Navy in 1981 with plans to run for Congress, and who would go on to be elected to the Senate in 1987, succeeding a man seen by many as a true conservative, Barry Goldwater.

And I say true conservative because it has been over the course of this man’s 30 year tenure as a senator that he has gradually moved further and further to the left, and who has now decided, as he is on his way out, to take things to a more personal level with a president that many in the ‘Republican Establishment’, of which this man is one, don’t particularly care for.  And his willingness to do so reveals just how shallow of an individual he really is, and demonstrates that he would rather attempt what he views as being revenge than to take the high road and do what would be in the best interest of the American people.  Are these actions the actions of a war hero?    

All of which finally brings me to the man of whom I speak, John McCain, who appeared to take a shot at President Trump in a recent interview about the Vietnam War by criticizing draft deferments granted disproportionately to the wealthy.  It was during an interview that aired on C-SPAN 3 just this past Sunday that McCain said, “One aspect of the conflict, by the way, that I will never, ever countenance is that we drafted the lowest income level of America and the highest level would get a doctor to say they had a bone spur.”  And he went on to say, “That is wrong. That is wrong. If we are going to ask every American to serve, every American should serve.”

Apparently what remains to not sit well with McCain is the fact that Trump received five deferments from the draft during the Vietnam War.  Four were granted because Trump was in college.  But the last deferment, in 1968, was because Trump was diagnosed with a bone spur in the heel of his foot.  Now perhaps Trump did take advantage of his wealth, or maybe he didn’t, but McCain’s accusations ring a little hollow in that McCain obviously wasn’t above taking advantage of the fact that both his father and grandfather were Admirals to gain for himself a leg up on his competition.  So might this be little more than the pot calling the kettle black?

McCain was a naval aviator who flew nearly two dozen missions during the Vietnam War before his final mission, in Oct. 1967, ended when he was shot down over Hanoi.  He was held in North Vietnamese prisons until March of 1973.  And it would only be much later that word would leak out how his fellow prisoner of war mates actually nicknamed him "Songbird McCain!"  The Vietnam War has been invoked before in a long-simmering battle between Trump and McCain.  In July 2015, just after Trump declared his candidacy for president, Trump denied that McCain is a war hero.  And I think, if we’re being honest, then-candidate Trump was pretty close to being right.

And it was again in just the last week that McCain once again chose to venture back onto the rhetorical battlefield with now President Trump, criticizing “half-baked, spurious nationalism cooked up by people who would rather find scapegoats than solve problems.”  McCain’s remarks, made during a speech in which McCain accepted the Liberty Medal, were seen as a direct repudiation of Trump.  Responding to McCain’s remarks the next day, President Trump said in a radio interview that “people have to be careful because at some point I fight back.”  McCain would go on to make his thinly-veiled dig at Trump’s deferment in an interview the following day.

And while ‘war hero’ McCain continues to spend a great deal of his time going out of his way trying to trash Trump, he does everything within his power to make sure that he was able to grind to a halt the most recent attempt to repeal and replace Obamacare while he himself has received, and continues to receive, nothing short of top notch medical treatment because members of Congress made themselves exempt from what us common folk are subjected to and, of course, because he has money.  And also I have yet to hear whether he intends to support the tax cuts that benefit many of us in the middle class, or if he will again act as spoiler on that issue as well.

Being no true hero, it’s like so many others in the ‘Republican Establishment’ that McCain suffers from Acute Trump Derangement Syndrome as well as his brain cancer.  McCain is Despicable, Absolutely Pathetic and Contemptible.  He constantly betrays the very people who he is supposed to represent.  Being filled with so much hate is not a good condition for the soul of someone facing death.  McCain long ago became little more than a disgrace and an embarrassment to Arizona as well as to the nation.  As a Soros stooge and a globalist he is ‘THE’ poster child for “term limits”.  And he is someone who personifies the ‘Swamp’ that is so urgently in need of being drained.

John Kerry-Heinz is another loser from the Vietnam era who has tried and failed to wear the ‘hero’ moniker.  He served for four months and used supposed injuries that were for the most part self-inflicted as a way to garner some medals for himself and to be sent home.  Then he goes before Congress and lies about our troops, essentially selling them out.  John Kerry-Heinz’s legacy is one that has him being honored by the very communists the U.S. was fighting, and for helping them win the war.  That too is not the behavior of a hero, but it is likely why Obummer chose him to be his Secretary of State, since Kerry-Heinz hates America as much as Obummer.  But then, I digress.

Anyway, it was during his last reelection campaign that McCain ran as being a leader in bringing about the end of Obamacare. But of course that was when everyone was so sure that the next president was going to be Hitlery.  So instead McCain chose to save it.  McCain is one of the major reasons that the majority of people no longer trust politicians to do the right thing.  He always manages to do the wrong thing whether we‘re talking about Obamacare, illegal immigration/the border, or nearly any other issue that is important to those of us who identify as conservatives.  McCain has never really been the guy that he’s always portrayed himself as being.  Far from it.

And if you doubt that, it’s according to Col. Ted Guy, John McCain’s commander as a POW, that McCain was known to have collaborated with the enemy and also has been accused of doing the following:

1.  McCain is accused of giving information that led to the downing of 60 U.S. aircraft.

2.  McCain is accused of training North Vietnamese air defense personnel.

3.  McCain is accused of making over 30 propaganda broadcasts against the US, broadcasts he moved to have classified when he was elected to the Senate.

Our government never officially briefed our returning POWs about the egregious violations of the Paris Peace Accords, by both Hanoi and Washington DC.  Washington refused to pay the $4.25 Billion President Nixon secretly promised in a February 1, 1973 letter to Premier Pham Van Dong and Hanoi failed to release the other group of 600 US POWs they were holding as an insurance policy against these funds.  And had the truth been told to our returning heroes, they would have undoubtedly led the charge for the return of their comrades.  Instead they were sent out to America's heartland as the war heroes we so desperately needed, McCain and Ted Guy included.

But Guy, as he began to read the new revelations that began surfacing in the 1980’s, had by 1991, seen enough.  By then he realized that he had been lied to, and that we had knowingly left men behind.  And it was with other former POWs that he went around DC trying to get the government to reverse policy and negotiate for those still being held in Vietnam and Laos.  It was then that McCain entered into the picture and as more new information surfaced showing that indeed we had left men behind, McCain began a long and rather vicious campaign to discredit and shoot down any new information or anyone advocating that the truth about our POWs be made public. 

And yet this is the man that so many still refer to today as being a ‘war hero’.  This is a man who continues to put his petty political disagreements with the president above the needs of the American people, many of whom still look upon him as a bona fide war hero.  While he may have had the best of intentions when first elected, somehow I doubt it.  Either way he has become little more than a very vindictive old man, who long ago ceased being someone worthy of anyone’s respect.  And it’s sad that the people of Arizona were unable to recognize that fact and sadder still that the only way we will finally come to be rid of John McCain is when he dies.  

HOW ONE PERSON MAKES CLEAR ALL THAT’S WRONG WITH THE DEMOCRAT PARTY…

Just one more thing about this belligerent, racist, piece of garbage, Frederica Wilson, and then I’m gonna stop talking about her and consider the horse to be officially dead.  That said, I do think that it’s high time to find out just how many of the American people support the rather demented perspective that the Democrat Party has on the truly important issues from national defense to illegal immigration to healthcare.  And I think the next election should be framed as being a referendum, of sorts, on where it is that the Democrat Party, and the Establishment Republicans, wish to take this country.  The 2018 election could very well turn out to be a defining moment for American politics, because it could very well determine what sort of future the American people want for their children and their children’s children. 

And what I think would be the perfect representation of the Democrat Party is the smirking mug of one Frederica Wilson, who now claims to be a “rock star” because of her recent, and rather incendiary, attack on President Trump over a phone call made to the widow of a soldier killed on active duty.  This brainless liberal hack who is one of the more anti-military members of Congress now claims to have her panties in a bunch over what she says was a rude and callous phone call from the president.  This scumbag is nothing more than a political opportunist who couldn’t care less about this young man who lost his life, nor about the widow that has left behind.  And what does this latest trip into the bizarre by this walking/talking freakshow of a politician say about the people who voted for her?  Only that they must be as stupid as she is.  

It was Miami’s 7News WSVN that reported how, during an interview on Thursday, Wilson responded to criticisms from the White House by stating that it’s “amazing” that she’s become important enough to be followed by the White House and will have to tell her kids “I’m a rock star now.”  According to 7News, Wilson responded to White House Chief of Staff General John Kelly’s criticisms of her by stating, “Let me tell you what my mother told me when I was little. She said, ‘The dog can bark at the moon all night long, but it doesn’t become an issue until the moon barks back.'”  The video of this piss-poor excuse for a human-being should be played over and over again in all manner of campaign ads between now and next November.  Because this is how disgusting Democrats, ALL Democrats, truly are.

Now you would think that somewhere along the line the Democrat Party would have embarked on a different path than many longtime Democrats, having moved much further to the left, but when I see the number of those still willing to vote for Democrat candidates, I do have to wonder.  Because it seems that no matter how outlandish, or how far to the left, the party becomes there are still those who will vote Democrat for no other reason than because they always have.  Are these people living under a rock?  The national debt now stands at over $20 Trillion and still there seems to be no interest in cutting back on the amount of money being spent.  But it’s anyone who advocates for spending cuts that is almost immediately attacked as being someone who wants to hurt minorities who ‘need’ government ‘assistance’.

If you pay close attention it’s in pretty short order that after a while you begin to notice that we have a pattern developing.  Because as time goes by we seem to see the same people crawling out from under their rock, with each one spewing the exact same drivel as they attack both President Trump and conservatives in general.  And once we tire of one, it’s very quickly that they’re replaced by another and the cycle repeats itself with a new face spewing the same old rhetoric.  You’ll notice that the more vocal critics tend to be black, and Democrat, and tend to migrate most often to MSNBC and CNN with exactly the same talking points and with exactly the same agenda.  And it is a list of the usual suspects that follows, those who willingly throw their fellow blacks under the bus in exchange for a little political power: 

John Lewis

Elijah Cummings

James Clyburn

Al Green

Corey Booker

Keith Ellison

Hank Johnson

Kamala Harris

Sheila Jackson Lee

Gwen Moore

Marcia Fudge

Maxine Waters

And now this most recent idiot, Frederica Wilson

And you know, all of these people, besides being incredibly disingenuous, more than a little dishonest and just a tad bit creepy, are also incredibly corrupt individuals who are not the least bit afraid to use the color of their skin as their main bargaining chip in their continuing effort to get, and to keep, a place at the Democrat Party decision making table.  And while they seem quite content to be excluded from the actual decision making process, they are always willing to follow the orders they are given to go into the black community and to con black folks into believing that it’s still the Democrat Party that has their best interest at heart.  And it says a lot about both Wilson and her party that she could, and so casually, use the death of this soldier and his widow to do nothing more than to attack President Trump and Republicans.

To be perfectly honest, this truly is one very twisted woman.  And as much as she might want us all to think that she is somehow some great friend of those who serve in the military. She is, in reality, anything but.  Wilson has voted against anything and everything that can be said to be even remotely connected to our military.  She opposed a bill Expanding Benefits to the Families of Fallen Soldiers and she voted against a bill Protecting Whistleblowers within the VA.  Also, Wilson opposed the “Consolidated and Further Continuing Appropriations Act,” which prevented a government shutdown and provided funds for the U.S. military and the VA.  And these are but a few of the examples of just how hypocritical she is when it comes to our veterans, as well as those who are still serving on active duty

Let’s face it, Wilson is the perfect example of how it is that the Democrat Party of today has come to be comprised solely of those who are so consumed by hate that they have reduced themselves to the equivalent of someone who has no soul.  They hate the president, they hate those who voted for the president, they hate the country, they hate, hate, hate, and then they hate some more.  It’s what they do, it’s what gives them their purpose and yet it’s what they constantly accuse those of us on the right as being guilty of.  And how is that anyone, regardless of their skin color, ethnic background or social status can look within themselves and say yes, I can vote for someone who is a Democrat?  It’s absolutely mind-boggling!  Democrat politicians, as well as many the Republican Party, are no longer worthy of our votes.