What it is about those in charge of the Democrat
Party and a lack of possessing even a most rudimentary understanding of our
Constitution? I mean do they really not
understand what it says, or is there something a bit more sinister underway
here? For instance, do they truly
possess no understanding of it, or are they simply betting on the fact that
those who tend to vote for Democrats don’t understand it or even know what it
is. Personally, I’m thinking that those
in charge of the party have a pretty good grasp on what it is that our
Constitution says, and they’re pretty confident that the vast majority of those
who proudly vote for Democrats haven’t got a clue. And that’s how those in charge prefer
it.
Which brings me to another example of where we have
a high ranking member in the Democrat Party attempting to take advantage of
that significant ignorance regarding our Constitution. Now I’m sure most of us are aware that
genuine American History is very rarely taught in our public schools today. And dare I say that there is a specific
reason for this. Because if the true
history of our nation was actually taught then it would be common knowledge
that the Electoral College has a purpose and was established by our Founding
Fathers, in the Constitution, as a compromise between election of the President
by a vote in Congress and election of the President by a popular vote of
qualified citizens.
Frankly, I can’t remember another time in my sixty
five years of being on this planet where I've ever seen such a dedicated and
concerted effort by those in the Democrat Party to convince their followers
that the Electoral College is nothing more than something dreamt to somehow rig
the system against them. The most recent
attempt came from none other than Democratic National Committee chairman Tom
Perez who falsely claimed, yet again, that the Electoral College is not “a
creation of the Constitution.” During a
lecture at Indiana University Law School, Perez said the Electoral College
“doesn’t have to be there,” asserting that the national popular vote should be
the principal standard.
And it was in lying through his teeth that Perez
said, “The Electoral College is not a creation of the Constitution. It doesn’t
have to be there.” And he went on to
say, “There’s a national popular vote compact in which a number of states have
passed a bill that says we will allocate our vote, our electoral votes, to the
person who wins the national popular vote once other states totaling 270
electoral votes do the same.” You know, it’s
the fact that he knows he’s lying is what makes his actions all the more
disgusting and, dare I say, even more than just a little sinister. But this is the type of behavior that we have
now come to expect from those in charge of the Democrat Party and others one
the left.
Perez’s claim that the U.S. Constitution is not a
part of the Electoral College is, however, completely false and he knows
it. Because he knows as well as the rest
of us that Article II clearly outlines the electoral process, dictating that
states must appoint electors who meet and vote for the president. Article II very clearly states, “Each State
shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number
of Electors, equal to the whole Number of Senators and Representatives to which
the State may be entitled in the Congress: but no Senator or Representative, or
Person holding an Office of Trust or Profit under the United States, shall be
appointed an Elector.” Pretty cut and
dry.
Perez has made statements in the past implying that
that President Donald Trump actually “didn’t win” the 2016 presidential
election because Hiterly won the popular vote.
That’s just one of the many reasons that I have such a difficult time
taking anyone in the Democrat Party seriously.
Because they’re nothing but a pack of unprincipled liars. You can’t tell me that Perez actually
believes any of the shit that is constantly coming out of his mouth. And yet he’s hoping that those to whom he is
speaking, will. And it’s obvious that
many of them do, which only encourages losers like Perez to spew even more of
their rather toxic and blatantly incendiary rhetoric adding to our era of
political incivility.
Look, the Founding Fathers created the Constitution,
which was then approved by the people, and it’s the Constitution that makes very
clear the purpose of the Electoral College and the role state legislatures play
in shaping it. Where Perez practices to
deceive is when he pretends not to know that every election we have ever had
has been won by the candidate with the most Electoral College votes, regardless
of popular vote. Hitlery lost in the
very same fashion as has every presidential election loser that came before
her, and Trump won the election in the very same way that every other
presidential candidate won. If Perez
wants to change the way candidates win the presidency, there’s a process.
Nothing known to us thus far would change how the
outcome of the last election was arrived at, Donald J. Trump is the
constitutionally elected president of these United States. And it’s only those afflicted with Trump
Acceptance Resistance Disorder, or (TARD), which apparently includes Perez, who
refuse to accept that fact. For those
unfamiliar, TARD is a pattern of pathologically dissociative and psychotic
behavior, first observed in the late hours of November 8, 2016, and seems only
to have increased in severity ever since.
Those afflicted with TARD often exhibit a rather pronounced cognitive
dissonance, sudden bouts of rage, uncontrollable crying, suicidal ideation, and
extreme butt-hurt.
Typically, those diagnosed with TARD are
characterized by the possessing of a persistent unwillingness to accept that
Donald Trump is going to “Make America Great Again,” and an overwhelming need
to say just about anything in an effort to undermine, discredit or delegitimize
our duly elected president. Individual
sufferers can be expected to display signs of paranoia and delusion; and in
acute cases psychotic episodes have been observed. Those afflicted go beyond being simply upset
about the results of the 2016 presidential election, it’s those afflicted with
TARD who are either completely unwilling or unable to accept reality, and very
stubbornly so, despite irrefutable evidence.
And when it comes to those afflicted with this
condition, the only known treatment that can be said to be in any way effective
is regular exposure to some sort of psychiatric therapy. The patient must be repeatedly exposed to
heavy doses of political reality, and should be made to wear a “Make America
Great Again” hat for as long as they are able to tolerate it, with each
exposure increasing in length. And it
should be after no less than a week that the patient should be encouraged to be
seen in public wearing the ‘MAGA’ hat.
And ultimately, the goal should be to get the patient to where they are
comfortable wearing the ‘MAGA’ hat 24/7 without experiencing any outbursts of
‘NeverTrumpisms.’
Be aware that patients with TARD are typically very
resistant to any form of treatment, and should always be considered as being
rather dangerous whenever they are present in large groups (usually any number
over 5). Any possibility of treatment
requires that they be separated from their hive-mind support apparatus since
they cannot begin the process of accepting reality in the presence of
encouragement towards delusion and irrationality. Separation may require the assistance of law
enforcement. And if you have a friend or
loved one who is suffering from TARD, urge them to seek treatment. We must help those who can’t help themselves,
and together we can beat this scourge, TARD.
But seriously folks, all joking aside, I can’t help
but wonder just how many people actually understand all of the unintended
consequences that would go along with the Electoral College being made to go
away. Now granted, the Democrats’ wish
to scrap it notwithstanding, we're still a very long way from abolishing it,
courtesy of a Constitutional amendment.
But people need to be made to realize that if that were to ever happen
the nation would essentially end up being run by little more than a hand full
of states, all of which are of the very deepest shade of blue. And why should the folks of, say, Nebraska be
left to have what would essentially be no say in who it is that would be
elected president?
Or to put it in such a way that even those in the
Democrat Party can understand, there are 3,141 counties in America. Donald Trump won 3,084 of them and Hitlery
won only 57. It would be ludicrous to suggest
that the vote of those who encompass a mere 57 counties should dictate the
outcome of a national election. And yet
we still have to listen to morons like Perez who continue to harp on the fact
that because Hitlery won the popular vote, it’s she who should now be our president. Why should I, as one who lives in one of
those 3,084 countries that Trump won be forced to live in a country shaped by
those who live in the 57 counties that Hitlery won? Come on people, this ain’t rocket science.
No comments:
Post a Comment