HITLERY, LIVING PROOF THAT LIBERALISM TRULY IS A MENTAL DISORDER…

The mind of a Democrat is something that is both truly unique and a bit baffling to behold.  Because it seems to allow a person to see themselves as being totally incapable of doing any wrong, while at the same time allowing them to think that they always have the absolute best solution to any problem no matter how complex that problem may be.  Which often makes them appear to the rest of as being more than a little delusional.  Liberalism has often times been described as being a mental disorder, and there is a mountain of evidence that would seem to indicate that that is in fact the case.  And there is really no one who makes for a better case study for such an argument than, Hitlery. 

Because it is with Hitlery that we have been provided with someone who can only be described as being, at least, narcissistic and at most, terminally psychotic.  She accuses the Trump campaign, and even the candidate himself, of colluding with the Russians, and yet she has no problem whatsoever when it comes to being able to go on television, as she did this past Wednesday night, and defend her own campaign’s funding of the so-called Trump dossier, even though the allegations in the document remain almost entirely uncorroborated.  In an interview with Trevor Noah of “The Daily Show,” Hitlery noted that the dossier, commissioned by opposition research firm Fusion GPS, is “still being evaluated.”

And it was in speaking about this dossier, that Hitlery said, “It’s part of what happens in a campaign where you get information that may or may not be useful and you try to make sure that anything you put in the public arena is accurate.”  The dossier was written by former British spy Christopher Steele.  It was revealed last week that Hitlery campaign lawyer Marc Elias hired Fusion GPS on behalf of the campaign and the Democratic National Committee (DNC) last April to investigate Trump.  Fusion hired Christopher Steele that June, and the ex-MI6 officer would go on to produce a research report now known as, “the dossier.”  Which was nothing more than a work of complete fiction.

And it was during her ‘interview’ with this boob Noah, that Hitlery made sure to mention how it was that Fusion GPS’s first client was a Republican donor who was very opposed Trump’s candidacy.  The ‘Washington Free Beacon’, a conservative website funded by Republican billionaire Paul Singer, recently came forward to identify itself as being Fusion’s first anti-Trump client.  The site hired Fusion in October 2015 and ended its research of Trump the following May.  And it should come as a surprise to no one that Hitlery failed to note that The Free Beacon had no involvement with the ‘dossier.’  But then since she's lied so much in her life I doubt she even knows what the truth is anymore.

Hitlery said, “This was research started by a Republican donor during the Republican primary, and then when Trump got the nomination for the Republican Party, the people doing it came to my campaign lawyer and said, ‘Would you like us to continue it?’”  And it was in speaking about Mr. Elias that Hitlery said, “He said yes.  He’s an experienced lawyer. He knows what the law is. He knows what opposition research is.”  While Mr. Elias might know what the law is, it was Hitlery and her campaign that apparently chose not to bother with following that law even though they chose to pay this gentlemen, Mr. Elias, significant amounts of money to keep her abreast of what that law very clearly said. 

And it was during the same little exchange between these two leftwing kooks that Hitlery also made sure to allow herself sufficient time to take the opportunity to criticize President Trump’s response to the recent terrorist attack in New York City by saying the president shouldn’t “point fingers,” or set people against each other and argued Trump “doesn’t have any empathy.”  Hitlery said, “Well, it’s so disappointing, Trevor. Because, you know, I was a senator from New York on 9/11. I was with President Obama through a lot of difficult decisions as his secretary of state. I obviously, saw my husband responding to tragedies, attacks, the Oklahoma City bombing.”  Hitlery, the ‘Queen of Empathy.’

And of course she went on to say, “And what you want in a president is what I think the three men I just mentioned delivered, and that is trying to bring the country together, talk about what happened with the event that they are concerned about, but not to point fingers, not to scapegoat, not to try to set Americans against each other. And, unfortunately, that just is not part of the job that our current president accepts or is willing to perform. You know, of course he can have his own point of view and push his policies. That goes with the job. But not to continue to divide Americans against each other. So, he just doesn’t have any empathy.”  So I ask you, who’s more divisive than Hitlery?

And then Hitlery said, “And you can disagree with somebody over all kinds of partisan issues, but you want to have a president who can try to put himself into the shoes, the feelings of somebody else. And he has not been able to do that.”  Oh I don’t know, President Trump has been made to face those whose lives were forever changed by hurricanes as well as the family members of those who died at the hand of a madman, and has displayed far more empathy than I would have ever expected to see from Hitlery, had she been placed in similar situations.  How empathetic was Hitlery when she looked the family members of those men whom she allowed to be murdered in Benghazi in the eye, and lied?  

Hitlery has repeatedly demonstrated that she is totally incapable of accepting responsibility for anything as she continues to live in denial, admits to wanting to make voodoo dolls of those critical of her, thinks so little of woman that she expected them to vote for her due to matching genders, thought “1984” was about trusting leaders, went around telling people she was shot at, complained Lauer asked her a hard question, etc.  She is the typical power hungry liberal who is part of the 1%, supports crony capitalism, is a lying a rape enabler, and is someone who is all about creating less choices, less freedoms, while demanding more in taxes, and claims to have spent 30 years in “public service”.

Actually she’s spent 30 years mired in one scandal after another!  And it’s the clueless liberal masses who don't even realize what they’re doing when they choose to not only empower those who do nothing more than to propagate all manner corruption in their attempt to advance their own unique brand of tyranny, but also when they choose to defend doing so along the way.  But don't worry, your freedoms will remain secure with the liars, reprobates and cheaters you elect to be charge.  NOT!  They choose to believe whatever it is that Hitlery, and those like her, choose to tell them.  They take being gullible and naïve to a whole new level.  And sadly, by doing so they place the rest of in jeopardy.

But then, I suppose we can't really blame the old girl for being a little unhinged.  After all, her life has been one traumatic occurrence after another.  She has a husband who cheats on her habitually and yet she is so consumed with political ‘ambition’ that she does all that she can to defend him.  She got snookered into the Whitewater deal, and wasn't able to fully recollect the details.  She had to land in a helicopter in a war zone while imaginary bullets were flying around her head, again so traumatized she forgot all the details.  She brought a reset button to Russia and ended up looking like an absolute buffoon, but we all know that some aide must have tricked her into that stunt.

Also, she helped to steer the Uranium One deal to her Russian friends in order to make up for her embarrassing reset button faux pas, but ‘forgot’ that the Russians had given her husband $500,000 for speaking to them about nothing.  Then she was somehow bamboozled into using a private server, because she doesn't know anything about technology, which is why she carried three devices, because she was confused.  She was so confused about what happened in Benghazi she orchestrated the arrest of some poor shlub who created one of the cheesiest videos ever and proceeded to tell everyone that it was the sole cause of what happened.  And she was seen as being the best candidate the Democrats had for president in 2016.

And then it was when she was confronted by Congress that she got so emotionally distraught that she just blurted out, “What difference, at this point, does it make?” forgetting that she was the one in charge and it was an investigation.  She always seems confused and claims to live under the constant threat of some “vast right wing conspiracy” who, after all these years, is either non-existent or the most inept conspiracy group ever.  So you see, it really can't be her fault, just ask her.  Sadly, unless and until the Clinton's and their equally corrupt “friends in high places” are fully exposed and prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law, America will continue to rot from within.  

All of which, at least from where I’m standing, begs the question, where the Hell is Attorney General Jeff Sessions?  Or for that matter, where the Hell is FBI Director, Chris Wray?  Are we simply to assume that they too are members of ‘The Swamp’ as well?  Nothing else makes any sense.  It’s now become painfully obvious, and a little more so with each passing day, that what we seem to have here is those involved in the Trump campaign now being investigated, and indicted, after being accused of doing exactly what it was that Hitlery & Co. were so obviously involved throughout the entire 2016 campaign.  It’s just all so very bizarre and more than just a little frustrating, as well as disconcerting.