So here we are more than a year after our last
presidential election and still Hitlery seems to be still in search of a reason
on which she can hang her humiliating defeat.
To the point where she is now pointing a rather boney finger at, where
else but, the eight years of former ex-president Obummer as the reason she
couldn’t campaign on an “agenda of change” and conceivably win the 2016
election. This despite the fact that
Obummer actively campaigned for her throughout the 2016 campaign.
It was during an interview with radio host Hugh
Hewitt earlier this week that Hitlery bemoaned being seen as an extension of
the Obummer years. Hitlery told Hewitt,
“It is true that when you run to succeed a two-term president of your own
party, you have a historical headwind blowing against you.” And she went on to say, “It’s not just this
campaign can be set apart from everything that’s ever happened in our politics.
It is a challenge.”
And Hitlery also suggested her campaign suffered
from mixed messaging. She said, “If you
are both the candidate defending a lot of the areas of agreement, but also
putting forth an agenda for change, which is what I tried to do, it is often
difficult to get the second part of that message through.” Is that what she was trying to do? Because while I must admit that I didn’t pay
that much attention to her campaign, what I did see of it, there were few, if
any, areas where she differed from Obummer.
Not that she really wanted to distance herself from
Obummer. Hitlery said, “I was proud to
serve in the Obama administration. I did not agree with everything that
President Obama decided, but on balance, I really think he did what had to be
done to rescue the economy, which as we all remember, was in desperate
straits.” People heard this coming from her
and looked back at eight years of anemic economic growth and an $10 Trillion
increase in the national debt and said no way, no Hitlery.
Despite her misgivings about messaging, Hitlery says
she continues to have a “high regard for the campaign that we put together, and
all of the people who were working in it so hard.” Hitlery continued to differentiate her
campaign from that of Donald Trump, whom she described as “the first reality TV
candidate,” while she insisted she was “for better or worse, the candidate of
reality.” Ok, but whose reality? Hitlery was set to continue policies that had
been proven not to work.
And it was during the same interview that Hitlery
said she was “very much worried by the actions and rhetoric” of President
Donald Trump. She said, “I don’t have
any personal stake in this presidency. I have a citizen’s stake. I have a
concerned person’s stake. And I am, as you might guess, very much worried by
the actions and rhetoric of our current president. And so I was cordial with
him before we ran against each other. He supported me when I ran for the Senate
in New York.”
She said, “And then he began to traffic in all kinds
of conspiracies like the birther conspiracy, and you know, then making all
kinds of outrageous and untrue attacks on immigrants and others, and really
being an equal opportunity insulter. I really did hope, and as I said in my
concession speech, which I talk about in the book, I said we all need to give
him a chance. And we all need to support our president. We have one president
at a time. And I’ve been very disappointed in the way that he has conducted
himself.” This coming from the woman
married to ‘Slick Willy?”
Hewitt asked, “After this is all done, do you see
becoming friendly with him again?” And
Hitlery responded by saying, “I don’t know the answer to that question, Hugh. I
think that you know, his attacks on so many of the concerns that I’ve always
had, I’ll give you just a quick example, I was involved in the bipartisan
program called the Children’s Health Insurance Program, Ted Kennedy, Orrin
Hatch, I mean real, you know, real Republican-Democratic cooperation at the end
of the 90s.”
She continued by saying, “My husband signed it into
law in a Republican Congress, and George W. Bush continued it. Barack Obama and
a Republican Congress continued it. And it takes care of 9 million kids whose
families, you know, are too well off, even though they are working families for
Medicaid, and they don’t have insurance under an employer that covers the very
expensive costs of caring for kids with chronic, congenital, traumatic
conditions.”
And she added, “Okay, so I don’t think a word has
been said by the current president, and certainly the Congress has failed to
reauthorize it. So at the end of this year, right around Christmas, 9 million
kids and their families are going to start being told they no longer have
health insurance for cystic fibrosis, for diabetes, for cancer, whatever it might
be. I don’t understand that, Hugh. I don’t get it. And so it’s not just
personal with, you know, threats against me and all that stuff that goes on.”
And she concluded by saying, “It’s really a values
issue for me, because you know, I do think we’re put on this Earth in large
measure to try to help take care of each other. And we can do that in smart
ways, and I’ve always tried to be on the smart side of that. But you know, to
walk away from caring for kids, I just don’t understand it.” I hate to be the one to break it to her, but
her ‘values’ are not the ‘values’ of most Americans. And when has she ever been on the smart side
of anything?
Look, Hitlery had 90% of the state-controlled media actively
promoting her despite knowing what a terrible candidate she actually was. And at the same time they were busy promoting
her they were doing all that they could to tear down her opponent. And add to that the fact that Hitlery, quite literally,
had all of Hollyweird in her corner as well.
And she also had most of academia in her corner, we now know that she
literally owned the DNC, and still, even with all that she couldn’t win.
And it wasn’t because she was a woman. It was
because the majority of those who actually vote in election didn’t believe her
to be trustworthy and she confirmed their distrust by keeping a private email
server and lying about it. She lost
because she called 50% of the voting public “deplorable.” She lost because she’s a hypocrite,
championing women’s rights and then trashing/threatening the women your husband
harassed and abused. You lost because her political positions shift with the
wind.
But most of all, she lost because, while Donald
Trump was talking about the economy and jobs, all she was talking about was Donald
Trump. And as we saw, a “He’s worse than
me” strategy wasn’t really an effective campaign strategy. If it had been it would now be President
Hitlery and not President Trump. Anyone
who happened to catch any of her campaign speeches knew long before the
election, regardless of what all the polls were supposedly telling us, that
Hitlery was toast.
But I suppose, to a limited extent, hers is a
legitimate complaint. The biggest part
of Obummer’s legacy is the election of Donald Trump. It was Obummer, as much as it was Hitlery,
that the voters were voting against.
Future elections may see a recurring pattern of “We will Vote for: No
Democrats, No Liberals, No East-Coast Snobs, No Left-Coast Marxists.” Eight years of Obummer taught many Americans
some serious lessons about Progressivism.
Hence Democrat desire to keep our borders open.
It was about her loss that Hitlery said, “Hack, hack,
what difference, at this point, does it make?
I’ve been suffering from PTSD ever since the snipers were shooting at me
as I disembarked the helicopter, I am not able to handle the various
technological devices I have, I misplaced my server, when I found it I needed
to wipe it, like with a cloth. And I’ve
had to deal with so many bimbo eruptions I could puke! This is all part of the vast, right wing
conspiracy and it’s not my fault, hack, wheeze, I lost!”
And remember it was Hitlery who did her college thesis on her hero Saul Alinsky. For those of you who have never heard of Alinsky, he wrote "Rules for Radicals". It’s a ‘how to’ for anarchists that gives them ‘rules’ that will aid them in overthrowing the USA. Alinsky was a socialist who wanted to undermine and overthrow America in order to fundamentally transform America's capitalist order and change it to communism. Hitlery’s entire ‘career’ has been based on the overthrow of America.
No comments:
Post a Comment