GOV. CHRISTIE VERSUS "NUTTY" MSNBC HOST

The governor is only telling it like it is.

ROSIE “O’DIPSHIT” AND OLD JOY BEHAR DISCUSS NEWT

Well we now know how it is that at least these two liberal morons feel about one GOP candidate in particular, and most likely, how they feel about all of them. Since leaving that rather odd assortment of "ladies" referred to as The View, Rosie O’Donnell has continued to find various ways to get her fat mug on television screens and media outlets via headlines in various gossip magazines, a show on the new, and ratings challenged, Oprah Winfrey Network as well as occasional guest appearances on Curb Your Enthusiasm. Appearing on the, soon to be defunct, HLN show of her former fellow left-leaning bimbo, on the aforementioned The View, O’Donnell somehow felt qualified to offer her rather bizarre opinion on current affairs. She seemed to have a lot to say about former Speaker of the House, college history professor and prolific author of books on history, Newt Gingrich. Now let’s be real here, most likely the only books this moron has ever read had very large pictures that you use crayons to color in, and very small words.

OUR FIGHT SONG FOR 2012

I was sitting at a stoplight the other night on my way home from work when a song came on the radio that I hadn’t heard in quite some time. It was one of those old songs that, you know, can somehow magically take you back to another place and another time for just that briefest of moments. Anyway, it was an old Merle Haggard song entitled, "The Fightin' Side of Me." and as I listened to it I remembered exactly why it was that it had been one of my favorite songs at a time when I was much younger and as I listened I realized that it is still one of my favorite songs today. And I thought about how relevant the lyrics still seem to be even today, especially when one considers what the Liberal Democrats, our stellar our president, acting in concert with our state-run media, are all saying about our country on pretty much of a daily basis. Also as I listened, it struck me how this simple little song would make the perfect anthem to be sung by those who are currently working so hard to bring about a much needed conservative revolution, come this November, because it seemed to me that the words of the song cut to the very core of what it is that’s being perpetrated against the very foundations of the country. The feelings it stirred in me were the very same ones that I remember feeling when I heard the song for the very first time, because I love my country, to the point where I proudly spent a big chunk of my life in the service of her Navy. And I think it sums up pretty well the way many of us still feel about our country and about the attempts made by Barry "Almighty" and the rest of the "scumbag" Democrats who constantly work to demean it and all that it stands for. It’s a song that not only tells it like it is, but how it should be. That our country, regardless of what Barry "Almighty" and the Democrats may say or do, is special and possesses a uniqueness found nowhere else on the planet, and we should be proud to called Americans, not shy away from it. We must fight contemptible individuals who continually go about the slandering of our country 24/7 and who should be seen for exactly what they are, as being nothing more than anti-Freedom and anti-American zealots. Their behavior is to be considered as being nothing less than traitorous and they should be condemned at every opportunity. Because we do live in the greatest nation in the World and we must work to do all that we can to come together and unite in putting a stop to what is being done by those who are determined to destroy it. And to all those who insist on griping about this country, if you don’t love it, then just do us all a big favor and leave it. You are not needed here nor are you welcome here.

I have included the words here just in case there are those of you out there who are not familiar with it because either you don't listen to country music or because maybe it was just a little bit before your time.

I hear people talkin' bad,
About the way we have to live here in this country,
Harpin' on the wars we fight,
An' gripin' 'bout the way things oughta be.
An' I don't mind 'em switchin' sides,
An' standin' up for things they believe in.
When they're runnin' down my country, man,
They're walkin' on the fightin' side of me.

Yeah, walkin' on the fightin' side of me.
Runnin' down the way of life,
Our fightin' men have fought and died to keep.
If you don't love it, leave it:
Let this song I'm singin' be a warnin'.
If you're runnin' down my country, man,
You're walkin' on the fightin' side of me.

I read about some squirrely guy,
Who claims, he just don't believe in fightin'.
An' I wonder just how long,
The rest of us can count on bein' free.
They love our milk an' honey,
But they preach about some other way of livin'.
When they're runnin' down my country, hoss,
They're walkin' on the fightin' side of me.

Yeah, walkin' on the fightin' side of me.
Runnin' down the way of life,
Our fightin' men have fought and died to keep.
If you don't love it, leave it:
Let this song I'm singin' be a warnin'.
If you're runnin' down my country, man,
You're walkin' on the fightin' side of me.

Yeah, walkin' on the fightin' side of me.
Runnin' down the way of life,
Our fightin' men have fought and died to keep.
If you don't love it, leave it:
Let this song I'm singin' be a warnin'.
If you're runnin' down my country, man,
You're walkin' on the fightin' side of me.

DEMOCRATS COULD LEARN A LOT FROM RED SKELTON

The words of Mr. Red Skelton:

"On January 14, 1969, I presented "The Little Old Man" as a teacher. The time was 1923.The students had finished reciting the Pledge of Allegiance which at the time was but 10 years old. The old sage called the children together and said--
"Boys and girls, I have been listening to you recite the Pledge of Allegiance all semester and it appears that it has become monotonous to you or could it be you do not know the meaning of those words. If I may, I would like to recite the Pledge and give to you a definition of the words.
I----meaning me, an individual, a committee of one.
Pledge----dedicate all of my worldly goods to give without self pity.
Allegiance----my love and my devotion.
To the Flag----our standard, Old Glory, a symbol of freedom. Wherever she waves, there is respect because your loyalty has given her a dignity that shouts freedom is everybody's job.
Of the United----that means that we have all come together.
States----individual communities that have united into 48 great states. 48 individual communities with pride and dignity and purpose, all divided with imaginary boundaries, yet united to a common cause, and that's love of country.
Of America.
And to the Republic----a republic, a state in which sovereign power is invested in representatives chosen by the people to govern. And government is the people and it's from the people to the leaders, not from the leaders to the people.
For which it stands!
One nation----meaning, so blessed by God.
Indivisible----incapable of being divided.
With Liberty----which is freedom and the right of power to live one's life without threats or fear or any sort of retaliation.
And justice----The principle and quality of dealing fairly with others.
For all.----which means, boys and girls, it's as much your country as it is mine.

Since I was a small boy, two states have been added to our nation, and two words have been added to the Pledge of Allegiance "under God." Wouldn't it be a pity if someone said, "That's a prayer" and that would be eliminated from schools, too?"

Me and my family used to watch Mr. Skelton every week. His show was one we tried very hard to never miss, always making sure we were home in time to watch. I remember laughing hyterically from beginning to end every single week at the characters he was able to bring to life. He was just a funny, funny man, and one of those rare individuals that we are so seldom blessed with. And he was also a man who fit anyones definition of a true patriot. Which, I'm afraid, is something that cannot be said of our pathetic president nor, sadly, a majority of today's Democrats!

THANK YOU OBAMA

I am, like most Americans, clearly worse off that I was just since this past spring. And I have proof to back up my claim in that I can very easily point to a new Federal Reserve report. It’s that report that shows that the average U.S. household lost $21,261 of net worth over the summer months. Can you imagine losing over $20,000? Now I’m sure that’s not much money, in the big scheme of things, to Barry, but it’s a ton of money to me. Both my wife and I are military retirees, and our tax bill swallows the entire amount of my wife’s retirement.

Of course none of this should come as big news to Barry "Almighty," after all, it’s his policies that have brought this all about. The same Barry who went on record during an exchange with ABC’s Georgie Stephanopoulos in October saying that Americans are not better off than they were before he moved into the White House.   "Well, I don't think they're better off than they were four years ago," Barry said at that time. "They're not better off than they were before Lehman collapsed, before the financial crisis, before this extraordinary recession that we're going through." Duh?

Barry, however, pointed to supposed progress in stabilizing the economy during the same interview. "I think that what we've seen is that we've been able to make steady progress to stabilize the economy, but the unemployment rate is still way too high. And that's why it's so critical for us to make sure that we are taking every action we can take to put people back to work." Just how is it that Barry defines "steady progress?" He talks about taking "every action" to put people back to work, but he is absolutely resolute against taking any sort of action that will accomplish doing just that!

Attributed to falling home values and a tumultuous stock market, the third-quarter decline marked the second straight quarter of eroding net wealth for U.S. households. The news comes at a time when the president has already received sharp criticism over a reported 17-day Hawaiian Christmas vacation in an exclusive beach-front residence in Kailua, Oahu and for his lack of leadership. A vacation that, after receiving a significant amount of pressure of potential adversaries, he has backed off of for now after receiving a considerable amount of criticism.

Barry’s favorite vacation spot described as being the "Winter White House," the rental has been estimated to cost as much as $3,500 a day or $75,000 a month. Our "Dear Beloved Leader" has also come under mounting criticism for failing to demonstrate any sort of leadership and has been described as sitting on the sidelines, acting as nothing more as a spectator during the collapse of the congressional budget supercommittee. A supposed bipartisan group which was unable to reach agreement on ways to solve the country’s debt crisis.

As the supercommittee neared its deadline, the president was off the mainland U.S. for nine days, hosting an Asian-Pacific summit in Hawaii before jetting off to Australia and Indonesia. Meanwhile, two straight quarterly declines in household net worth have cost U.S. families a combined $2.55 trillion, that according to the New York Post report. Household net worth is considered to be the value of homes, bank accounts and stocks less mortgages, credit cards and other debt. It is hard to fathom that everyday Americans have seen such a significant loss in the net worth, and yet we have all thanks to Barry.

The overall net worth of households declined from $511,224 at the start of 2011 to just $498,751 as of Sept. 30. The decline follows an average increase of $9,757 per household between January and March that was offset slightly by a $912 decline in the second quarter.Overall, about 15 cents of every $1 of U.S. household wealth is tied to stocks or mutual funds, which are held by about half of all households. The Fed found that stock portfolios declined by about 5.2 percent in the third quarter, while home process dropped slightly more than half a percent. Home values dropped to $16.1 trillion from $21 trillion in 2007, according to the Post.

So how many of us are better off that we were before Barry "Almighty" came into office. The electing of Barry has been a self-inflicted wound of such a magnitude that it may in the end prove to be fatal when it comes to the survival of our way of life. "Hope and Change" was all a mirage, a ploy of you will, designed to inspire us, to lull us into a false sense that we could build upon what we had. Instead, "Hope and Change" was all about tearing down.
It was about bringing about a "fundamental transformation" of this country. And a direct result as been a massive loss in net worth by those of us in he middle class.

MY MAN RICK!

DOUCHE BAG ALEC BALDWIN GETS BOOTED OFF FLIGHT...

In what surely must have been one of those "I'd have loved to have been a fly on the wall" moments, loudmouth loser Alec Baldwin recently got his fat butt kicked off of an American Airlines flight in Los Angeles for thinking he was just a tab bit better than the rest of his fellow passengers. Supposedly he was just so wrapped up playing a game on his phone that he went well past the point when passengers are supposed to have turned off their electronic devices. Later, and in very typical Baldwin fashion, the overweight dweeb wrote on his Twitter account: "Flight attendant on American [Airlines] reamed me out 4 playing WORDS W FRIENDS while we sat at the gate, not moving." Pathetic malcontents, like Baldwin, think that rules are not meant to apply to them, they are above all that petty nonsense. Rules are just meant to be followed by the little people. Big shot movie stars are to be treated accordingly.

Baldwin was onboard American Airlines Flight 4, which was delayed an hour, when old Alec was asked to please remove himself from the aircraft for failing to listen to the flight attendant. Another passenger, some guy named Steve Weiss, who had the misfortune to be sitting across the isle from Baldwin, described the scene. "Apparently he said he was playing a game, but he was actually talking on the phone. She [the flight attendant] was very nice. The door was closed they just announced that they were pulling away from the gate. He got up threw his papers on the floor stormed into the bathroom slammed the door closed, beat on the wall and then came back." "He said 'If you want to kick me off, kick me off.' He was just crazy, he just flipped out, the guy has problems." That, Mr. Weiss, is the understatement of the millennium! Baldwin has somewhat of a long history of being somewhat psychotic.

A crew member who was the poor unfortunate soul forced to deal with our favorite Hollywood douche bag, said he couldn't stay on the flight. "He was violent, abusive and aggressive. He got into the bathroom and started beating on the wall and he pounded his fists on the galley counter. Yelling, screaming, very ugly. It was unsafe to keep him on board that's why he got kicked out." In other words he was demonstrating his typical juvenile behavior. The crew member did not want to give her name, but said she asked him five times to get off his phone. "He was asked five times. I contacted the captain. We were brought back in and he was let off the plane." No special treatment for Baldwin was given. "Everybody is the same. Everyone has to follow the rules, it doesn't matter who you are," the crew member said. Naturally, American Airlines declined to comment on the entire episode.

SENATE DEMOCRATS CONTINUE THEIR ASSAULT ON THE MILITARY…



I spent over 20 years in the military service of this country, retiring in 2002. So on Thursday, when the U.S. Senate successfully voted to approve a defense authorization bill which not only included a provision that repealed the military ban on sodomy, but also repealed the ban on having sex with animals, or bestiality, I thanked God that I served during the time that I did. On Nov. 15, the Senate Armed Services Committee unanimously approved S. 1867, the National Defense Authorization Act, which includes a provision to repeal Article 125 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ). Article 125 of the UCMJ makes it illegal to engage in both sodomy with humans and sex with animals. It states: "(a) Any person subject to this chapter who engages in unnatural carnal copulation with another person of the same or opposite sex or with an animal is guilty of sodomy. Penetration, however slight, is sufficient to complete the offense. (b) Any person found guilty of sodomy shall be punished as a court-martial may direct." The military hasn’t been so abused since the days of Carter, and to a lesser degree, "BJ" Clinton.

This vote to remove sodomy from military law should not have been a big surprise to anybody. It was something that we all should have known would be coming, and in very short order, especially after Barry "Almighty’s" repealed the policy of Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell allowing for gays to openly serve in our military. And his purpose for doing so really had nothing whatsoever to do with some sense of wanting to right some wrong or any perceived indignity suffered by gays regarding their inability to openly serve. It was done because it killed two birds with one stone. It was an used as an opportunity to pander to gays while also being one more step in Barry’s plan to transform our military from a highly skilled and well-armed fighting force, into what is, instead, nothing more than some cockamamie social experiment. The entire Democrat Party, including our current Commander-in-Chief, has always had a deep-seated, and very obvious, hatred of our military. They see the military as possessing no useful purpose. It is a waste of money that could be better spent on wasteful entitlement programs designed to keep Democrat constituents happy.

Mr. Tony Perkins, who is the president of the conservative Family Research Council, said there’s a definite link between the repeal of Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell and the most recent repeal of the sodomy law. "It’s all about using the military to advance this administration’s radical social agenda," Mr. Perkins has said in a recent interview. "Not only did they overturn Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell, but they had another problem, and that is, under military law sodomy is illegal, just as adultery is illegal, so they had to remove that prohibition against sodomy." Perkins said removing the bestiality provision may have been intentional — or it may just have been "collateral damage." Mr. Perkins said removing the bestiality provision may have been intentional--or just "collateral damage" "Well, whether it was inadvertent or not, they have also taken out the provision against bestiality," he said. "So now, under the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), there’s nothing there to prosecute bestiality." Those in Congress, in an effort to put politics above all else, have a history of possessing very little interest in the many unintended consequences their actions bring about.

Former Army Col. Bob Maginnis has said in recent interviews that some military lawyers have indicated bestiality "could be" prosecuted under another section of the military code of justice — Article 134, for offenses against "good military order and discipline." But that is far from being a sure bet, though. "If we have a soldier who engages in sodomy with an animal — whether a government animal or a non-government animal — is it, in fact, a chargeable offense under the Uniform Code? I think that’s in question," He went on to say, "When the reader stops laughing, the reader needs to ask the question whether or not this is in the best interests of the government, in the best interests of the military and the best interests of the country? I think not." For those who have never spent anytime in the military, there is no point of reference regarding the amount of time spent in very close quarters or the lack of any privacy experienced the majority of the time, from open bay barracks or community showers. Therefore, they should have no opinion regarding this matter because they simply don’t know what they’re talking about.

While the bill was passed in the Senate by a margin of 93-7, with 3 Republicans, 3 Democrats and 1 Independent voting against it for various reasons, it will now head on to a conference committee to be reconciled with the House of Representatives’ version of the bill. According to Mr. Perkins, the House version reinforced the Defense of Marriage Act, saying that there is a military Defense of Marriage Act as well, prohibiting same-sex marriage on military bases. "And now this is an added concern, that sodomy has been removed, and as we have discovered, that bestiality — the prohibition against it — has been removed from the Uniform Code of Military Justice. So yes, the House will have problems with this bill," Perkins predicted. And rightly so, it should have problems with this horrendous piece of Democrat inspired legislation. It is imperative that we put the brakes on this thing, if for no other reason than to provide to those who chose to serve some level proof that we have no desire to make their jobs any more difficult by turning them into some sort of guinea pigs part of some twisted Democrat social engineering project.

CORRUPTION RUNS PRETTY DEEP IN THE JACKSON CLAN…

Or maybe a more fitting title for this little piece might be, "THE ACORN NEVER ALLS FAR FROM THE TREE." Because you see, it seems that the House Ethics Committee has recently announced that it plans to continue its investigation into allegations that Rep. Jesse Jackson Jr. or someone acting on his behalf offered to raise campaign cash for then-Gov. Rod Blagojevich in exchange for a Senate appointment in 2008. The announcement came in the form of a joint news release it which Ethics Committee Chairman Jo Bonner (R-Ala.) and ranking member Linda Sanchez (D-Calif.) said the panel would need more time to "gather additional information necessary to complete its review." Gee, imagine that, someone with the name, Jesse Jackson, with a cloud of corruption hanging over him. No, tell me it isn’t so! Anyway, the committee also released an initial report from the Office of Congressional Ethics that said there was "probable cause" to believe that Jackson either directed a third party or had knowledge of a third party’s effort to convince old Blago to appoint Jackson Jr. in exchange for campaign cash. This is now the type of behavior that we’ve come to expect from sleazy Democrats who are out to subvert the electoral process.

The report, originally compiled in August 2009, said there is "substantial reason to believe" Jackson Jr. violated federal law by using his congressional staff to mount a "public campaign" to secure a Senate appointment. Jackson Jr. is accused of offering former Gov. Blago $1.5 million in campaign donations from supporters in exchange for the appointment to Barry "Almighty’s" former seat. The committee had previously suspended its investigation at the request of federal prosecutors trying Blago, who eventually was impeached and removed from office by the Illinois legislature. The report had not been released previously and the ethics committee had delayed its investigation because the Justice Department was conducting a criminal investigation that led to Blago’s conviction on a series of corruption charges including efforts to sell a Senate appointment. And, as something that should come as no surprise to anyone, is the fact that the Justice Department, under the magnificent leadership of Eric "No black can do any wrong" Holder, recently withdrew its request for the committee to defer its investigation, indicating it is no longer actively investigating Jackson. Gee, imagine that!

The detailed 2009 report from the Office of Congressional Ethics, released with the statement, indicates investigators have suspicions that Jackson had knowledge of efforts to persuade Blago to appoint him to the Senate. The report names a likely third party, some guy named Raghuveer Nayak. In a news release, Jackson’s office argued that there was "no basis" for the investigation into the matter. "Congressman Jackson engaged in a public effort to gain the appointment on the merits," his office said. "He made numerous media appearances in which he promoted his record as a Member of Congress and made the case for why he was the best choice for the Senate Seat … Congressman Jackson acted honorably at all times and did not violate any House rule or federal law in connection with the Senate appointment process." It went on to say, "According to Representative Jackson, Mr. Nayak never told him that he was arranging to raise money for the Senate seat, nor did it ever come to the Member’s attention, directly or indirectly, that Mr. Nayak might be doing so," the committee said in its report. "The last time Representative Jackson spoke with Mr. Nayak was either the day of or the day after the arrest of Governor Blagojevich."

The ethics committee had previously said it would determine by Friday what course its investigation would take involving Jackson, just another corrupt Democrat and son of self-professed civil rights leader, extortionist and faux preacher, Jesse Jackson. The younger Jackson responded to the committee’s decision to extend the investigation with a statement pledging to cooperate and reiterating that his efforts to be appointed to the Senate were above-board. "I have said from the beginning that I publicly and transparently sought to have the Governor of Illinois appoint me to fulfill the final two years of then-Senator Barack Obama’s term in the U.S. Senate," he said. "I did nothing illegal, unethical or inappropriate in that pursuit and I believe that is what the Ethics Committee will conclude at the end of this process." Right, Jackson Jr. is about as "transparent" as is his buddy Barry "Almighty." Yup, old Jesse Jr. is just like his old man, pure as the wind driven snow. If anything just the opposite is true. I’d say Jr. learned pretty well from his old man. Why be man enough to be honest and up front and take the risk of not "winning," when you can cheat the system and increase the odds of achieving that which you seek.

But at the same time he was pledging to cooperate, sounding as arrogant as his pathetic old man, Jackson Jr. also released a letter from his attorneys, who wrote that there is no basis for the committee’s investigation and urged the panel to "close its investigation of this matter." "Although Congressman Jackson was interested in the appointment ... he was largely focused on his own re-election and Obama’s campaign," Reid H. Weingarten and Brian M. Heberlig said in the letter. So I guess just because he says it, we’re supposed to believe it. What is it with these guys, he’s sounds remarkably like Barry, who also seems to be under the impression that we are simply to believe whatever it is that he say without question. Friday’s announcement means the committee will continue looking into allegations involving Blagojevich and whether Jackson inappropriately used government resources to angle for an appointment. It voted unanimously to continue its inquiry and set no timetable for a conclusion. The committee said in a statement that continuing the investigation "does not itself indicate that any violation occurred." That’s true, but when you have corrupt Democrats involved it’s always best to know for sure.

The bottom line here is that what we have here is yet another perfect example of a son being nothing more than a younger version of his father. A son who, in his desire to advance his political "career," saw the using of tactics that are highly suspect, to say the least, as being perfectly acceptable and well worth the risk. After all, he’s a Democrat, the any silly rules having to do with ethics don’t apply to him. Democrats, like Jackson, see themselves as being above the law, as not having to endure any level of scrutiny when it comes to the rather shady behavior. Here we have a family known for its willingness, even eagerness, to operate on the fringe of legality, but only if the price is right. The head of this little clan is an individual who has made his fortune by doing nothing more than to accuse others of being racist. And through the thinly veiled practice of extorting money from the accused, after which he proclaims they have changed their evil racist ways upon which time he then simply moves on, selecting yet another target on which he can use the very same tactic. I am well aware that Jr. is innocent until proven guilty, but there is a lot to be said for circumstantial evidence.
　

OBAMA SEES HIMSELF AS THE GREAT PROTECTOR OF ISRAEL



In a particular instance this week Barry provided to us, the American voters, with incontrovertible proof of just how blatantly this president will lie in his effort to get re-elected. He will say absolutely anything to anybody in an attempt to cast himself as having done so much, no only for this country, but the world. When in fact it is just the opposite is true. The world has become a much more volatile place since January 20, 2009, there is simply no way to dispute that fact. And it goes without saying that this country is now far worse off than when Barry's cool self first came struttin into the Oval Office. So, while a great many people view him as being nothing more than a colossal failure, his perception of himself is starkly different. He has said on any number of occasions that he would proudly put his record up against anybody's. Really?

So it should come as no surprise that in what was nothing more than a very transparent attempt to pander to the Jewish community in this country, who supported him in substantial numbers in 2008, that he is on the side of Israel. Barry “Almighty” made what can only be the most ridiculous claim I’ve yet heard come out of his mouth on Wednesday when he said he has done more for Israel’s security than any other administration, and vowed no ally is more important to the U.S. than the Jewish state. I can only imagine the astonished look that must of appeared on the faces of those in the crowd. And I’m amazed that he wasn’t looking upward for that stray bolt of lightening when he said, “I try not to pat myself too much on the back, but this administration has done more for the security of the state of Israel than any previous administration."

This little episode of self congratulatory rhetoric came while speaking to gathering of very prominent Jewish supporters at a New York City fundraiser. Barry said there is “enormous tumult” in the Middle East because of the Arab Spring, but that the U.S. stands firmly “on the side of democracy” and on Israel’s side, or at least that's how ABC reported it. “Whether it’s making sure that our intelligence cooperation is effective, to making sure that we’re able to construct something like an iron dome so that we don’t have missiles raining down on Tel Aviv, we have been consistent in insisting that we don’t compromise when it comes to Israel’s security,” Barry said. Adding, “Obviously, no ally is more important than the state of Israel.” Obvious to whom? It’s no longer all that obvious to me. How many times has he simply thrown Israel under the bus?

Our good buddy Barry faced some pretty stiff criticism earlier this year when he came out with what can only be described as the most idiotic and insane suggestion saying that negotiations for a Palestinian state should be based on the pre-1967 borders. And has had a strained relationship, to say the least, with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, including the little incident of when he was caught disparaging him on a live microphone with fellow socialist, French President Nicolas Sarkozy last month. American Jewish Congress chairman Jack Rosen, who hosted the fundraiser at his home, acknowledged there are those who are doubtful of Barry’s commitment to Israel, Reuters. “It would be remiss for me not to say there are many in the Jewish community who are concerned” about the relationship between Israel and the United States, Rosen said.

But Mr. Rosen added, “America has never been as supportive of the state of Israel as President Obama and his administration.” I can only think that for Mr. Rosen to hold such an opinion regarding the current level of support being provided to Israel, must be living in some alternate universe. Every Democrat president going back to Carter has not had a favorable view of Israel. It is only when there is a Republican in the White House that Israel can count on America. So I fail to understand what would motivate Mr. Rosen to make such a easily disprovable statement. Maybe he too, is come closet Israel haters. Anyway, it was again according to ABC that 30 Barry "Almighty" supporters each paid at least $10,000 per person to attend the little gathering. It was one of three fundraisers he attended in New York City Wednesday, marking 69 total fundraisers he has attended this year.

AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL TAKES INSANITY TO A NEW LEVEL...

Well it seems as if that little odd assortment of psychopaths fondly referred to as Amnesty International, is now drawing some a little bit fire for its continued calls for the arrest of former President George W. Bush for his administration’s use of waterboarding. The most recent call comes as the former president tours Africa promoting AIDS and cancer awareness, or so Fox News is reporting. This self-described "human rights organization" said "there is enough evidence in the public domain" to justify Ethiopia, Tanzania or Zambia arresting Bush on charges of committing "crimes under international law." is that not about the stupidest thing you've ever heard? You have to wonder, isn't there a more productive use of their time?

Anyway, according to Fox, some nut by the name of Matt Pollard, who is apparently the "senior legal adviser" for the American branch of this group of loons, said. "All countries to which George W. Bush travels have an obligation to bring him to justice for his role in torture." What Pollard is alluding to as being torture is the Bush administration’s use of the waterboarding that was used to successfully garner much needed information from three crazy terrorists. "They've been trying to get any country where President Bush and Vice President Cheney visit to harass them wherever they go," former Justice Department attorney John Yoo said of Amnesty's actions. And yet they face to repercussions for their reprehensible actions.

Former Bush advisor Brad Blakeman told Fox News that the Amnesty International campaign “could be taken as a call for violence against the president." Yoo, who provided the administration with the legal justification for their interrogation methods, called the campaign nothing more than a blatant form of harassment. Amnesty International also called for Bush to be arrested when he visited Canada back in October. And as amazing as it may sound, Barry "Almighty" has actually praised Mr. Bush for his work on AIDS, calling it “one of his greatest legacies,” Fox also reported. The type of behavior being demonstrated by this odd ball group makes very clear that they are far from deserving of whatever level of credibility it possesses.