Well there has been much ‘discussion’ over the course of the past several months, but it seems much longer than that, about when, not necessarily if, Hitlery "The Bitch Of Benghazi" Clinton will finally throw her bra into the ring and officially declare herself to be a candidate for president in 2016. And rumor has it that if she does in fact do so, she fully intends do nothing more than to run on her husband’s record. And yet, we’re told raising the fact that her husband is a known rapist should be considered off limits by any her potential rivals or opponents.
And now enter into the fray none other that Democrat National Committee Chairmoron, and that perennial dingbat, Debbie Wizzerman Schultz, who recently said news stories about Hitlery Clinton’s reaction to ‘BJ’ Clinton’s affair with intern Monica Lewinsky in the 1990s, when he was president, should be considered as being "offensive" and added that the Republican focus on the Clintons’ "personal, private family business" is part of the "war on women." So the fact that she stuck up for her pervert of a husband is not be something that canbe brought up?
It was earlier this month while appearing on MSBNC’s "Jansing and Co.", a program that I am not the least bit familiar with, that Wizzerman Schultz was asked about some recently released private papers belonging to the Clintons’ friend Diane Blair that "reveal conversations about the Monica Lewinsky affair." Richard Lui, who I’m guessing is the host of this MSNBC program, asked Wizzerman Schultz, "Some Republicans including Rand Paul and Reince Priebus say, ‘this is all fair game here.’ Are they right here?" Wizzerman Schultz responded with typical faux outrage.
Wizzerman Schultz said, "It’s stunning that the Republican leadership is so obsessed with Hillary Clinton and anyone’s personal, private, family business that they would dredge up 20-year-old issues like that is not only not-fair game, it’s offensive, and I think it’s just another example of their ability to alienate women across this country." She added, "And in the war on women, it’s just another opportunity for us to show that Republicans just don’t get it, and that’s why we’re going to continue to win women and it will matter in 2014 and in 2016."
Look, the bottom line here is that if women are stupid enough to continue to fall for this supposed Republican ‘war on women’ mantra that we hear coming from slimy individuals like Wizzerman Schultz, it will, in the end, say much more about women than it does about the Democrats. Speaking for myself, character, and how much of it is, or is not, possessed by any potential president, should be seen as an important qualifier. And after having suffered through eight long years with a president who possess precious little of that particular trait, do we really want to elect a successor who possesses even less?
Because when it comes to a "war on women", and who it is actually behind it, I think it rather obvious that in Hitlery Clinton, the Democrats have someone on the inside. This woman has repeatedly attacked the very women that her letch of a husband has ever sexually assaulted and even raped. So not only were these women made to suffer the indignity of being manhandled by this pervert, but also by being attacked by the twisted bitch to whom the pervert is married. Come on people, can’t we please do better than to put these two disgusting people back into the White House?
No comments:
Post a Comment