Let’s face it, if there is one thing we know for
certain about scumbag Democrats it’s that they never let a good tragedy go
ignored if there is any way possible to successfully exploit it to advance the
party’s agenda. So, it should come as no
surprise to find Hitlery Clinton doing her best to use the recent Oregon
shooting at a community college. It is
this incident that has now seemed to have reignited gun control as an issue in
the Democrat presidential race. The shooting
has, at least potentially, handed ‘front-runner’ Hitlery Clinton an issue which
she will try to use as part of her effort to sway progressives away from
challenger Bernie Sanders.
And perhaps sensing an opportunity to be taken
advantage of, Hitlery was quick to speak out forcefully in favor of new, and
much more strict, gun control measures immediately after Thursday's shooting by
a lone gunman on the campus of Umpqua Community College in Roseburg,
Oregon. A shooting in nine people were
killed and another nine were wounded.
But she, like Barry “Almighty, didn’t bother to point out, more than
likely very much on purpose, that the shooter involved was looking to kill himself
some Christians. Because to mention that
little fact might serve to damage the message she was working to hard to
convey.
Sanders has been dogged by criticism from various gun-control
groups for choosing to speak in much more measured terms when it comes to just
what kind of gun control is needed. Meanwhile,
it was at a campaign event in Davie, Florida, on Friday, Hitlery talked about
building a "national movement" the purpose of which would be to
counter the influence of the National Rifle Association (NRA), the nation's top
gun-rights advocacy group. She screeched,
"What's wrong with us that we can't stand up to the NRA and the gun
lobby?" As she launched into a full
scale tirade, blasting Republicans for being in the gun lobby's pocket.
It was to a crowd of supporters at Broward College
that Hitlery declared, “It is sickening to me.”
And then she went on to say, “People should not have to be afraid to go
to college like this one, or to a movie theater, or to Bible study. What is
wrong with us that we can’t stand up to the N.R.A.?” One could just as easily ask why is it that
Democrats can’t seem to bring themselves to stand up to Planned Parenthood, a
group that is actually responsible for the death of millions of innocents? Let’s put body count up of that organization
up against the body count of the NRA and determine which group is responsible
for more deaths.
Hitlery also took it upon herself to tout the
assault weapons ban, long since expired, that was enacted during the presidency
of her husband, the accused rapist, ‘Slick Willie’ Clinton. "We're going
to take (the gun lobby) on," she said, echoing the remarks she made
immediately after the Oregon shooting. "We took them on in the '90s. We're
going to take them on again." Of
course, and once again, she very conveniently neglected to mention that it was
allowed to expire because it proved to be nothing more than window dressing. But hey, as is usually the case with
Democrats, facts don’t matter, just the rhetoric!
Of course the many anti-Constitution, leftwing kook
fringe nutjobs, who comprise any number of gun-control groups praised her new, aggressive
stance. It was on this past Thursday
that some fella by name of Ladd Everitt, spokesmoron for something called the Coalition
to Stop Gun Violence, told Reuters, "Having Hillary say that stuff, it's
incredible.” Incredible? At the same time, Everitt's group has been
blasting Sanders, a U.S. senator from Vermont, for his support for a 2005
federal law that shields gun manufacturers, distributors and dealers from civil
liability for mass shootings. (A senator
at the time, Hitlery voted against the bill.)
Everitt said Sanders' position clashes with his
image as a progressive populist. He
said, "It's unsettling. It's not in concert with his anti-corporate
approach. We're at a moment where we
kind of need to be fearless." Along
with supporting the law providing legal immunity to gun makers, Sanders, as a
member of the House of Representatives, voted against the so-called Brady Bill
in 1993, which imposed mandatory background checks and waiting periods for gun purchases. Sanders defended his record on Thursday while
on MSNBC. He said, "I don't know that anybody knows what the magic
solution is."
But it would appear the Mr. Everett was less than
impressed with the esteemed Mr. Sanders.
Because Mr. Everett said, "You can sit there and say I think we
should do this and do that, but you've got a whole lot of states in this
country where people want virtually no gun control at all. And if we are going
to have some success we are going to have to start talking to each other." Everett then went on to say, "He has the
body language of a man who doesn't like talking about this," he said. The level naiveté, or perhaps gullibility, of
those who comprise the anti-gun crowd is really quite extraordinary. Strict gun laws no matter where they are
tried, fail!
And it was in stark contrast to Sanders that Hitlery
spent much of her summer, in the wake of mass shootings in Charleston, South
Carolina, Roanoke, Virginia, and elsewhere, advocating new measures the purpose
of which, or so it has been claimed, would be to quell gun violence. And, of
course, she has been very aggressively advocating for the need to curb the
power of the NRA, which repeatedly has worked to defeat new gun-control
initiatives in Congress. Hitlery taken
this more leftward tack as a way of trying to counter Sanders who, as a
self-described Socialist, has managed to siphon away support from progressives
within the party.
But her supporters say that with new attention given
the spate of gun violence in America, Hitlery may have found a way to blunt
Sanders' edge. "In light of Senator Sanders' record when it comes to guns,
I think it's a legitimate issue, a difference that Senator Clinton can and
should raise," said Jim Manley, a Democrat ‘strategist’. Sanders' campaign said critics are not
appreciating the candidate's full record on gun control. "The senator
supports sensible gun-control legislation," said campaign spokesman
Michael Briggs. Sanders supported Senate
efforts after the 2012 shootings at Sandy Hook elementary school to ban assault
weapons and high-capacity magazines.
And Sanders, like Hitlery, also backs eliminating
the "gun show loophole" that exempts purchasers in private gun sales
from background checks. But unlike Mr. Sanders,
Hitlery has not explicitly called for a new ban on assault weapons, an
incendiary issue among gun owners, even as she has praised the one passed
during the 1990s. And for some reason, her
campaign has repeatedly declined to clarify her position. So we can only assume that while Mr. Sanders
MUST be held accountable for his position on gun control, the same cannot be
said of Hitlery. After all, she is the
front runner, and as such cannot be asked to justify her positions on any
issue.
So look, I have some advice for those who seem to
have complete faith in, or think blind obedience to, the government is a good
thing. And let me make this as easy to
understand as I possibly can, hopefully so that even the likes of Mr. Ladd
might be able understand it. Democrats
view those lost due to gun violence as being nothing more than the necessary
casualties in their ongoing war on guns.
And while they are always quick to call for more gun control after a
tragedy like the recent one in Oregon, you hear absolutely nothing from them when
it comes to violence in places like Chicago.
A place that has some of the strictest gun laws in the country.
No comments:
Post a Comment