JOHN KERRY-HEINZ, MAN ON A MISSION…

Well it would seem that our incredibly worthless secretary of state, none other than the esteemed John Kerry-Heinz, has arrived in Paris to attend the much talked about gathering which has assembled in an effort to solve a problem that does not exist.  The purpose of his attendance is to lend his haughty weight to the ongoing, and quite ambitious, U.N. climate change talks.  And in what I can only assume was an attempt on his part to take a swipe at those of us who recognize this exercise in deception for the scam that it so very clearly is, Kerry-Heinz asserted the “need to make clear that those members of the flat earth society [who dispute global warming theory] are on the wrong side of history.” 

So it was then that shortly after arriving at this gathering of climate elitists, it was at an event hosted by the tech news site, ‘Mashable’, and the U.N. Foundation, that Kerry-Heinz was heard to say, “I am so hopeful that Paris will be a truly historic moment when we will ratify what people all over the world are coming to understand, and that is that uh, this is happening.”  He went on to say, “It’s happening now,” in reference to human-caused climate change.  Adding, “It’s happening faster than scientists predicted it would, and it’s happening to greater degrees than scientists predicted it would.”  But is it not only NOT happening faster than previously thought, it’s not happening at all.  NO warming has taken place since 1997.

But still he droned on.  Kerry-Heinz said, “And we need, as responsible leaders, to take account of science – not some cockamamie ideological hypothetical, but science.”  He continued, “And we need to make clear that those members of the flat earth society are on the wrong side of history.”   Saying, finally, that, “We are going to make Paris the demarcation point where we begin to get the job done to save the planet, period.”  Now let’s say, for the sake of argument, that the planet truly was in peril. Do we actually think imbeciles like Barry Kerry-Heinz could save it?  Somehow I think that if it was left up to this cast characters to save it, then it would definitely already be too late.

Anyway, we have tens of thousands of those identified as climate change ‘delegates’ from nearly 200 countries who have descended upon the French capital for talks aimed at reaching a new, post-2020 global climate agreement, which they hope to have accomplished by this Friday.  As you may recall Barry attended the opening day on November 30, delivered a too-long by 11 minutes speech, and returned home the following day dispensing 300,000 tons of CO2 in the process.  Keenly aware of the depth of opposition to new climate initiatives in the Republican-controlled U.S. Senate, Barry wants to avoid an agreement from Paris constituting a binding treaty, which would require Senate ratification.

And it was some guy by the name of Andrew Freedman, identified as being the ‘Mashable’ science editor, who asked Kerry-Heinz why it was that U.S. negotiators were opposing language in the draft agreement that says parties “shall implement policies to meet Paris targets.”  This guy Freedman asked Kerry-Heinz, “Is their view that the State Department is just concerned about triggering a Senate ratification requirement?”   To which Kerry-Heinz responded, “Well, the frank and simple answer is that certain legal – certain terms have legal impact and certain legal impacts have political impact, and certain political impact can kill the agreement.”  Huh?  What the Hell does that mean, exactly?

We’re told that the supposed goal of this odd assortment of self-described protectors of the planet is for all of these great minds to have come together in an effort to reach some sort of an agreement that will succeed in reducing emissions of the those dreaded greenhouse gases blamed for climate change, with the objective of which is to keep average temperatures from rising more than two degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels. World leaders agreed at earlier talks that doing so was necessary to avoid potentially cataclysmic harm to the planet.  At Paris many activists are pushing for a far more ambitious target – to keep temperature rise below 1.5 degrees Celsius.

And when asked about this Kerry-Heinz enthusiastically responded, “Do I sympathize with it? You bet I sympathize with it. I feel very strongly that when human activity that is a choice is potentially putting whole nation-states at risk, we better care about it.” Although two degrees was the declared target in line with the “science,” Kerry-Heinz said, aiming for an even lower target would serve as an “insurance policy against that science potentially being wrong.”  But he also sounded a cautious note, saying aiming for a 1.5 degree target may be not be realistic or achievable.  He said, “I don’t think it’s realistic to embrace as the – as the sort of principal target of this agreement that kind of a goal [1.5 degrees], because I don’t think it will be taken seriously and it may not be achievable.”

I guess what really sticks in my craw regarding all of this ‘climate change’ BS is the fact that it’s the personal behavior of about 1% of the U. S. population, the ‘do as I say not as I do’ crowd, that results in a CO2 footprint that’s roughly 50 TIMES the size of your average person’s.  No surprise there. But do you realize this means this small group is responsible for more than 33% of ALL (that's right, ALL) U. S. CO2 emissions? Can anyone, like for instance Mr. Kerry-Heinz, explain to me why all the plans being unilaterally implemented by Barry will allow this small group to continue to spew CO2 unabated while financially hammering those in the lower income and middle classes, just for being alive?

And for those who have been paying attention here, it should be painfully obvious how it is that Kerry-Heinz makes absolutely no sense whatsoever. He's insists upon throwing out all manner of platitudes and general accusations with absolutely no concrete information at all. He states things as goals, then says they are impossible. Then he says maybe some of the things are possible. Then he says that the "science is settled" even though it so very obviously is not because some nations will look at these idiotic ideas versus the potential financial impact they cause and say, no way. In some countries people like Kerry-Heinz get beheaded for using the people’s money to buy magic beans.