Despite the fact that fewer Americans are buying
into all of the much ballyhooed ‘climate change’ nonsense, after having finally
come to the realization that it’s nothing more than a scam perpetrated by the
left, John Kerry-Heinz was not the least bit deterred from making what is his
rather idiotic claim that the issue remains very important with voters, to the
point where it will actually have an impact on who wins the next presidential
election. He made this bizarre assumption
this past Sunday while on with George ‘Stephy’ Stephanopoulos. It was then that
Kerry-Heinz said he doubted that, “the American people, who predominantly do
believe in what is happening with climate change,” will elect a president who
does not “understand climate change” or is not committed to the type of global
agreement reached in Paris.
Kerry-Heinz was speaking from Paris, where these
so-called ‘climate change’ ‘delegates’, from 180 nations, approved a new global
climate accord. It was in referencing
this accord that Kerry-Heinz said, “I think, frankly, a lot of members of
Congress are on the wrong side of history, and I don’t believe you can be
elected president of the United States if you don’t understand climate change
and you’re not committed to this kind of a plan.” And when Stephy noted that Republican
presidential candidates have “vowed to undo the president’s [climate-related]
executive actions,” Kerry-Heinz simply responded, and in his typically arrogant
fashion, by saying, “Well, I think it’s irrelevant.” Well, I guess we’ll see just how irrelevant
it turns out to be when placed up against issues such as terrorism and the
economy!
It was then that Stephy followed up by asking
Kerry-Heinz, “So if President Obama’s successor is against it, will it
unravel?” To which our dolt of a
secretary of state responded by saying, “Well, obviously, if a Republican were
elected and they have the ability by executive order to undo things, the answer
is yes.” Kerry-Heinz went on to say, “But that’s why I don’t believe the American
people, who predominantly do believe in what is happening with climate change –
I don’t think they’re going to accept as a genuine leader someone who doesn’t
understand the science of climate change and isn’t willing to do something about
it.” For Kerry-Heinz to state that
belief in ‘climate change’ is necessary in order for someone to meet the
definition of being a genuine leader, very clearly demonstrates just how far
around the bend this boob has finally gotten.
Asked about the vocal opposition in Congress to this
deal reached in Paris, Kerry-Heinz underlined the administration’s supposed leadership
in getting the world’s two biggest greenhouse gas emitters – Red China and the
U.S. – to join in pledging reductions, spurring “184 other countries to step
up.” Kerry-Heinz said, “So this is
significant. I mean, what do – what do the members of Congress think when
leaders of major countries around the world are actually stepping up to do
these things? These are not – these guys aren’t making up the science or the
plans to do it.” But the science IS
being made up. And more scientific evidence
comes to light every day that disproves manmade ‘climate change’ is
occurring. Proof that’s ignored by the
left because it doesn’t fit their narrative that this ‘theory’ of ‘climate
change’ is actually settled science.
And it was in an earlier press availability get
together in Paris that Kerry-Heinz was even more categorical about the chances
of a president being elected who does not only fully accept the entire
cockamamie ‘climate change’ agenda, but also doesn’t enthusiastically embrace it,
saying that a candidate “who doesn’t understand the science and isn’t prepared
to do for the next generations what we did here today and follow through on it
cannot and will not be elected president of the United States. It’s that
simple.” Asked in that briefing how the
Paris accord would “survive this presidential election,” Kerry-Heinz said,
“it’s going to survive by electing a president who understands this and is
committed to it. That’s how it survives.”
In other words by electing a president who is perfectly willing to
perpetuate that which is nothing more than a scam.
As far as congressional opposition before the end of
the current presidency goes, Kerry-Heinz suggested in an appearance on NBC’s
“Meet the Press”, also this past Sunday, that Barry “Almighty” would veto any and
all attempts made to block his climate initiatives. Good old Chuckie Todd, the show’s leftist host,
said, “Congress does have the power of the purse, and they could prevent your –
they could prevent the federal government, despite any executive action, from
using money to participate in this.” He
then asked Kerry-Heinz, “If they do that, do you ask the president to veto that
bill?” Kerry-Heinz responded that Barry
was heavily invested in the new climate accord because he “believes this is a
major challenge to our country.” All
this is is yet another attempt by Barry to drive this country even further into
the economic ditch.
Kerry-Heinz said, “So if people want to tempt the
president’s veto, I really believe they do so inviting him to take the steps
that he will do to protect what he believes is a critical, urgent national
security issue for our country.” And he
then went on to say, “And the president, as you know, has been able to secure
money for critical programs on the basis of the fact that there is that check
and balance between the Congress and the executive. So I think the president’s
going to stand up for his program no matter what.” My response to that would be that if the
Republicans hope to hold onto the congressional majorities they had better
choose to stand up for the American people, the majority of whom are not going
to be able to afford that which Barry is working very hard to inflict upon them
courtesy of his war on fossil fuels, which is all this is really all about.
Personally, I feel pretty confident in saying that
the American people, at least those of us on the right, are finally beginning
to smarten up when it comes to the subject of manmade ‘climate change’, and are
now able to recognize the politics dressed up as science that’s so very obviously
behind it. So Mr. Kerry-Heinz can
confidently declare that belief in ‘climate change’ will be used by voters as
some sort of qualifier when it comes to voting for who should be the next
American president, and he may actually be right but not exactly in the way he intends. Because while Hitlery Clinton will likely not
be made to face any sort of consequences for choosing to support this
progressive nonsense, any Republican who decides to come out in support of this
‘climate change’ drivel will most assuredly, and significantly so, reduce his,
or her, chances of being elected.
No comments:
Post a Comment