I think, at least judging by any number of recently
conducted polls, it’s safe to say that a sizable majority of Americans today view
what is laughingly referred to as our “mainstream news” media as little more
than a massive propaganda conglomerate essentially under the sole ownership of
the Democrat Party. And as such it
should come as a surprise no one that The Washington ‘Com’Post, along with any
number of other state-controlled media outlets, did the best they could to make
much hay after Wednesday’s shooting in San Bernardino by claiming the attack
was somehow the 355th mass shooting in the U.S. since the beginning of 2015.
However, the reality is, shall we say, much more nuanced.
Post reporter, and I use the term loosely, Christopher
Ingraham makes no attempt to disguise the argument he’s trying to make. Ingraham wrote, “Speaking after the Colorado
Springs shooting last week, President Obama urged Americans to not let this type
of violence ‘become normal.'” Ingraham went on to write, “But the data show
that this type of incident already is normal. There have been more mass
shootings than calendar days so far this year.”
Now of course the implication here is that San Bernardino wasn’t a
stand-out event, but instead just the latest in a long string of so-called
“mass” shootings. The Post’s narrative was imitated by several other outlets,
such as the Los Angeles Times and NBC News.
But, as is usually the, things aren’t not always as
those in the “news” would have you believe.
First of all, the Post’s definition of a “mass shooting” isn’t an
official one taken from law enforcement, but is instead taken from activists
operating on the website Reddit. The activists, who track shootings at the
website Shooting Tracker, define a mass shooting as any shooting where 4 or more
people are injured or killed. This is a
critical sleight of hand that ends up disguising the reality of most shootings.
While “mass shooting” conjures images
of bloodbaths like San Bernardino, Sandy Hook, or Columbine, 147 of the
shootings tracked by Shooting Tracker actually didn’t result in a single death.
The truth is that more than 40 percent of all 2015’s
“mass shootings” didn’t kill anybody. Another
104, just under 30 percent, had a single fatality, which means more than
two-thirds of all “mass shootings” aren’t even multi-homicide events. Of the 355 “mass shootings” noted by the
Post, only 40 of them (about 11 percent) meet the threshold of a “mass murder”
as defined by the FBI, meaning there were at least four fatalities. But even
these weren’t all mass shootings in the conventional sense. As pointed out by
the Washington Free Beacon, many of them were instead grisly murder-suicides,
gangland massacres, or robberies, eliminating at least 15 more “mass shootings”
from the list.
So once again we are provided with yet another
example of how those in our state-controlled media seem to feel completely
justified in their efforts to play loose with the facts if done so in an effort
to move forward with the sought after narrative, which in this case is gun
control. According to the FBI there were
only 160 “active shooter incidents” between 2000 and 2013, when gang-related
shootings were excepted, but those where nobody was shot or killed were
included. The Washington Post
uncritically mentioned the high number of shootings while adding no additional
context or explanation, and ignoring the nuance of the Shooting Tracker’s
numbers. The Post is but one example of
what our ‘news’ media has become.
No comments:
Post a Comment