Wednesday, October 3, 2018

CORY BOOKER, A LEGEND IN HIS OWN PEA-SIZED MIND…


I continually find it to be rather amazing how anyone with any amount of intelligence is able to take New Jersey Senator, and potential 2020 presidential wannabe, Cory Booker seriously.  He revealed much about himself when he told reporters this past Tuesday that Judge Kavanaugh’s actual guilt or innocence regarding the allegations being made against him is simply irrelevant to the question of whether or not President Trump should rescind his nomination and pick someone else.  But is there anyone that the president could have nominated that Booker and his fellow Democrats would not have chosen to destroy?  Doubtful.  And yet Judge Kavanaugh has had a distinguished career and he is deserving of this nomination.

Booker told reporters, “My hope is, beyond the vicious partisan rancor that is going on, beyond the accusations, we don’t lose sight of what this moral moment is about in this country, and ultimately ask ourselves the question: is this the right person to sit on the highest court in the land for a lifetime appointment? When their credibility has been challenged by intimates, people that knew the candidate well, as a classmate. When his temperament has been revealed in an emotional moment, where he used language that, frankly, shocked a lot of us. And then ultimately, not whether he’s innocent or guilty — this is not a trial — but ultimately, has enough questions be raised that we should not move on to another candidate?”

And then this moron went on to say, “Ultimately, the Supreme Court is not an entitlement. Just because you went to Yale or were president of your class doesn’t entitle you to the Supreme Court. This is a sacred institution and the people who should be on it — whether you disagree with their political or judicial philosophy at all — the people who should be on the Supreme Court should preserve the integrity of the court, and be beyond the reproach of these difficult partisan times.”  And then, as if it would somehow make ANY difference who it was that the president might have nominated, suggested President Trump choose someone else from the “long list put together by the Heritage Foundation and the Federalist Society.” 

You know, if Booker were being honest, which we all know is a pretty rare occurrence for ANY Democrat, he would just admit that this continuing circus has absolutely nothing at all to do with finding “the right person to sit on the highest court in the land” and everything to do with the Left's fear of Judge Kavanaugh’s belief in our Constitution.  And it is because of ‘that’ that those on the Left, including Booker, will manufacture all manner of lie, innuendo or smear necessary in their effort to satisfy their brain-dead supporters.  Democrats don’t care if there is any truth to these accusations, only that the accusations are being made and then repeated over and over again until, hopefully, enough people will come to see them as being true.  

This moron asked, "Is this the right person to sit on the highest court in the land?"  Well, he was confirmed thirteen years ago to sit on the SECOND HIGHEST court in the land, so I'd say that's a pretty good qualifier.  Let’s be real, President Trump could have nominated the Dalai Lama and the Democrats would be calling him out as a wife beater, a drunk and a pervert, and for being an elitist, a racist and, just for good measure, a Nazi.  At some point America is going to need to rid itself of the liberal scum that has nothing to say.  It’s all negative. Our President just keeps right on winning on everything.  I’ve never seen a President in my 66 years that has done more for the working man than President Trump. Thank you Mr. President.

Contrary what this imbecile may claim, this ‘IS’ a trial, and it is only a moron who would think it isn't. They questioned him, they cross examined him.  They then demanded an investigation by the FBI.  That is all part of a trial. This is not just a job interview and they know it.  The only thing Booker was honest about is the fact that the Democrats will do whatever it takes to stop Judge Kavanaugh, or any other conservative, from getting on the Supreme Court.  And as they have repeatedly shown, there is absolutely nothing that can be considered as out of bounds or that crosses the line of common decency.  Such is the type of behavior that has become commonplace for members of the modern day Democrat Party.

Long before Judge Kavanaugh’s name was placed into nomination, it was stated by more than a few Democrats, and on more than a few occasions, that it really didn't matter who it was that President Trump might chose to nominate, so Booker’s idiotic notion that if someone else were to be chosen from some previously mentioned “long list” they would not, necessarily, be made to run the same gauntlet as Judge Kavanaugh is just as bogus as was his self-described ‘Spartacus moment.’  I’m quite confident that everyone has known all along that Democrats were never going to vote for this nominee, or for any other Trump nominee.  To believe anything else one would had to have spent the last two years living under a rock.  

This has been the tactic all along.  To find some way, any way, that would allow the Democrats to delay the process for as long as possible and to raise as many doubts as possible, all in the effort to convince the nominee himself, or the President, to withdraw the nomination.  And if able to achieve such a thing it would result in what would most certainly be a Democrat win.  I would like to hope that every Republican senator, including those RINOs in question, will come to understand what’s really being attempted here and vote accordingly, just as the rest of us will come November’s elections.  Any Republican who votes against Kavanaugh's confirmation needs to be defeated and sent back to where they came from.

No comments:

Post a Comment