It’s become just about impossible, these days, to
determine just which ‘news’ organization it is that is least interested in
reporting the ‘news’ and far more interested in assisting the Democrat Party in
its quest to, and by any means possible, undermine and to delegitimize the
Trump presidency. And now that rabid
Trump Derangement Syndrome (TDS) seems to be running rampant throughout our
‘fake news’ media establishment, and at near epidemic levels, have we gotten to
the point where it can now be said that ‘journalists’ have now all simply gone
extinct?
And so as President Trump continues to spar with
House Democrats over subpoenas, it was MSNBC’s “Morning Joe” host, Joe
Scarborough who, while not an actual ‘journalist,’ recently applauded
Democrats, going so far as to say that “history has chosen” their party to
“stand up and defend the rule of law” in America. Scarborough said that as a
former Republican, it makes him “sad” to see the Republicans “breaking the
law.” And the most remarkable thing, I
think, about him saying such a thing is the fact that he was able to get
through his entire rant with a straight face.
Joe said, “You can look at all of the document
requests that they’ve ignored.” And then
went on to say, “They’re in contempt of Congress.” He later added, “History has chosen the
Democratic Party at this point in time to be the only party in America who will
stand up and defend the rule of law. The only party. There is no one else
there.” Personally I can't stand this boob if for no other reason than because
he's a freaking idiot! I don’t seem to
recall ever once having heard him complain when Barry ‘O’ and crew actually did
break all kinds of laws, including spying on the opposition.
But I’m more than a bit curious regarding how it is
that Joe may choose to actually define the ‘rule of law’. I mean does it include such things as being in
favor of open borders, sanctuary cities and allowing anyone who may want to
come into this country to simply ‘come on down?’ Does it include favoring rampant election
fraud that always seems to benefit the Democrats, and does it include granting
voting rights to criminals, the killing of babies right up the moment of birth
and even after? Is this how he might
define the “rule of law?” I’m serious,
I’d really like to know.
And if history truly has chosen the party which has
committed the most egregious breach of our laws in attempting that which was
nothing less than a coup of a sitting, duly elected President, to ‘Stand Up and
Defend the Rule of Law’, then I would have to say that Hell hath truly frozen
over. Who would have ever thought that
the party of slavery, the Civil War, Jim Crow, the Ku Klux Klan, segregation, Black
Lives Matter, By Any Means Necessary and more, would actually be the party that
history would decide upon as being the ‘rule of law’ party? Sure didn’t see that coming.
But an interesting little factoid that Joe must not
be aware of: In 1999 Congress passed additional
laws after ‘Slick Willy’s’ impeachment regulating the powers of the Special
Prosecutor. One addition was when the final report is released, information
could be redacted that would reveal the names of peripheral and non-involved
witnesses, as well as information that was being used in ongoing federal
investigations. That is precisely the
law followed by Mr. Barr. Democrats are
now asking Mr. Barr to break that very same law and release the UNREDACTED
report.
When you run into someone who declares the Democrats
are the party of the rule of law ask them when they intend to prosecute Hitlery
for her: 1) willful violation of FOIA, 2) destruction of governmental property
by deleting 30K emails, 3) her obstruction of justice by deleting those 30K
emails will they were under subpoena, 4) her will removal of classified
materials from secure storage to insecure storage, and 5) her deliberate
dissemination of classified materials to people without clearance. You will see
them fly into a rage as they try to declare she did nothing wrong.
Joe has become a punch line, but is too dunderheaded
to get it. His haircut is suited for a twenty something skateboarder (you
aren’t fooling anyone, Joe. You are in no way “hip”). He has a third grader’s
understanding of the law and the Constitution and can’t help proving it day,
after day, after day. Mika is a simpering dingbat who nods and pearl clutches
at his idiocy and has nothing of substance to offer. They’re a couple of
clowns, stuck in an echo chamber where the rest of the clowns reside. No
worries, though. The two of them are so obnoxious no one watches anyway.
No comments:
Post a Comment