‘SLICK WILLY’ FLOATS YET ANOTHER EXCUSE FOR HITLERY’S LOSS…

And the excuses keep on coming for why Hitlery lost to Donald Trump.  Let’s see, there was the “fake news” excuse, the “James Comey” excuse, and let’s not forget the “Russian hacking” excuse.  And just when we thought we’d heard it all, along comes ‘Slick Willy’, impeached ex-president and spouse of the most corrupt candidate to ever run for president, to offer yet another excuse.  You see, it’s according to the old ‘Slickmeister’ that while Donald Trump “doesn’t know much”, it seems that “one thing he does know is how to get angry, white men to vote for him.”

At least that’s what old ‘Slick” spewed to a local newspaper earlier this month.  ‘Slick’ was speaking to a reporter from The Record-Review, a weekly newspaper serving the towns of Bedford and Pound Ridge, New York, not far from the Clintons’ home in Chappaqua, New York.  The ex-president held court earlier this month in Katonah, New York, where he took questions from the reporter and other customers inside a small bookstore.  More than likely, in this particular locale, most of those present had voted for Hitlery and therefore were eager to accept ‘Slick’s’ theory.

When it came to the question of Russian cyberattacks damaging the candidacy of his wife, Hitlery, ‘Slick’ said, “you would need to have a single-digit IQ not to recognize what was going on.”  But he blamed FBI Director James Comey for her loss, telling those gathered around him that he had “cost her the election” by announcing with less than two weeks to go before the election that the bureau was examining fresh evidence related to her use of a private email server during her tenure as secretary of state.  After all, how else could someone so ‘qualified’ actually lose?

‘Slick’ confirmed that he had, in fact, received a phone call from Trump on the day after the election and said that the Manhattan billionaire was ‘strangely’ cordial, “like it was 15 years ago” when he was friendly with the Clintons and would socialize with them. ‘Slick’ said Trump told him that Hitlery “was tougher than I thought she’d be.”  So I’m curious, just what was it that old ‘Slick’ might have been trying to imply, exactly, by describing Trump as being “strangely cordial?”  I guess when it comes to the classless Clintons, cordiality doesn’t apply when you lose. 

‘Slick’ also scoffed at the standard claim from Trump and his team that the president-elect’s Election Day win represented a “landslide” victory, despite the fact that he lost the popular vote.  ‘Slick’ said, “Landslide? I got something like 370 electoral votes,” correctly recalling his 1992 total. He added, “That was a landslide.”  While that may be true, when you stop to consider the fact that Trump was predicted, by many of the so-called experts, to garner no more than roughly 180 electoral votes, the 304 he ended up winning can, and justifiably so, be referred to as a landslide.

And also in his attempt to mock Trump’s claim of an Electoral College “landslide”, what ‘Slick’ very clearly neglects to mention regarding his own claim of having ‘won’ “something like 370 electoral votes”, is the fact that had it not been for Third Party candidate Ross Perot being in the race, old ‘Slick’ would not only have never ‘won’ 370 electoral votes, but he very likely would never have won the election.  But he doesn’t ever want to go there.  He likes to continually portray himself as having been the obvious choice of millions of Americans regardless of political party.

Look ‘Slick’, how about we just cut to the chase, shall we?  The fact is Hitlery was never ahead and therefore she was never really ever going to win.  The proof of that played out right before our eyes every single night on our television screens.  While Trump was filling stadiums, Mrs. ‘Slick Willy’ couldn’t manage to fill a high school auditorium.  And it was talking head after talking head who doubted that all those bodies would actually translate into votes.  They chose instead to place their faith in the polls that they rest us were able to recognize as being clearly bogus. 

Personally, I couldn’t be happier that the jig is, at long last, finally up for these two grifters. These two have swindled, coerced, bribed, slandered, lied to and bullied their way to the top and working class white men were joined by millions of other angry voters in America and took the bitch down.  All races, creeds, genders and even those of different sexual orientations come together in the effort to finally show them the door.  Yeah, just lie to folks, telling them how everyone is out to get them, and those angry conservative white dudes will prove themselves stupid and easily excitable.

Poor ‘Slick’. Most presidents are dead and buried before history writes their final review, but Hitlery's loss gives ‘Slick’ quite a preview. America rejected another Clinton, but more to the point America elected Trump.  Even a potential Trump presidency was seen as being better than another Clinton.  He was called a rapist during the second debate and nobody jumped to his defense.  His accusers were there, all eyes were on him, his daughter was sitting with him and he looked angry. And the Clinton Foundation has been exposed for the shakedown organization it is.

‘Slick’ has to know that that's his legacy: that he’s nothing more than a crooked, alleged rapist whom very few, except the most hardcore of Democrats, wanted to see back in the White House, in any capacity.  And now with Hitlery suffering her second defeat in as many attempts, dare we hope that, when it comes to the Clintons, our long national nightmare is finally over?  After all, it seems like they’ve been around forever.  I wish I could confidently say that I think we’ve heard the last from them, but somehow I very much doubt it.  I don’t think we could be THAT lucky!