"If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear." ― George Orwell
Friday, May 10, 2013
NOT TO WORRY FOLKS, JOHN KERRY-HEINZ "WILL LEAVE NO STONE UNTURNED"...
Ok, so even though every single Democrat, when asked about it, has done absolutely nothing but lie when it comes to the event of Sept. 11, 2012 in Benghazi, we're now supposed to somehow believe John Kerry-Heinz when he tells us that he will leave no stone unturned in trying to get to the bottom of what happened that terrible night. And so it was then that amid potentially damaging new revelations coming out about the State Department’s early assessments regarding attribution for the Benghazi consulate attack, that our current Secretary of State John Kerry-Heinz pledged on Thursday, that if any disciplinary action is found to be necessary, he will ensure it happens. IF?
Kerry-Heinz told reporters in Rome as he wrapped yet another one of his trademark foreign trip fiascoes, "I am absolutely determined that this issue will be answered, will be put to bed, and if there’s any culpability in any area that is appropriate to be handled in some way with some discipline, it will be appropriately handled." The senile old fart went on to say, "But that judgment awaits me in a report that will be forthcoming, and I’m confident that any recent evidence will be a component of that consideration." Ya know, this boob is about as worthless as they come. The only guy more worthless than Kerry-Heinz is at doing his job is Barry "Almighty" at doing his.
So it was then in responding to questions about claims made during Wednesday’s congressional hearing on Benghazi, Kerry-Heinz said, "The State Department will leave no stone unturned." RIGHT! This moron went on to claim, "I’ve already made it crystal clear to the chairmen of the relevant [congressional] committees that I have assigned my chief of staff, David Wade, to be responsible for liaisoning with them to answer any questions that they have." Oh ya, now doesn't that just give everybody that big fat warm and fuzzy feelin? Well I don't know about you, but I don't trust this loser any father than I could throw him. Which I figure isn't too far.
But Kerry-Heinz blabbered on saying that thus far he had only "seen the most cursory headlines" about the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee hearing and said he would need to get back to the U.S. before he could "catch up to the full measure of what took place." Blah, blah, blah, he's talking but he's not saying anything. Which when speaking about Kerry-Heinz, is usually the case. And then, of course, we have numerous other Democratic lawmakers as well as any number of administration dolts out there continuing to do their level best to mischaracterize the hearing as being nothing more than a politically-motivated rehash. Ah, but not so fast.
Because in amongst the information revealed publicly, and for the very first time, on Wednesday was this little email that appeared to challenge directly the administration’s choice of defense regarding its early claims about responsibility to the deadly September 11, 2012 attack. Addressed to senior State Department officials including then-Secretary of State Hitlery Clinton's chief of staff, bimbo Cheryl Mills, the email from acting assistant secretary of state for the Near East, Beth Jones, sent one day after the attack, makes clear that Islamic terrorists, not Muslims angered by an amateur online video satirizing Mohammed, were being blamed. Well imagine that?
This inept clown wrote in the email that, "I spoke to the Libyan ambassador and emphasized importance of Libyan leaders continuing to make strong statements." Jones went on in the email, "When he said his government suspected that former Gaddafi regime elements carried out the attacks, I told him that the group that conducted the attacks, Ansar al-Shari’a, is affiliated with Islamic terrorists." Yet, strangely enough, four days after Jones sent that email, the administration put Susan Rice out front to tell the Sept. 16 Sunday talk shows that the attack, according to the 'best information currently available', was a "spontaneous reaction" to the video clip. Hmmm.
Administration officials have since essentially lied, and repeatedly so, in making their claim that they have cooperated fully with Congress over the Benghazi issue. This attack cost the lives of Ambassador Chris Stevens, foreign service officer Sean Smith and Navy Seals Tyrone Woods and Glen Doherty. Stevens was the first American ambassador to die in the performance of his job since Jimmy Carter was president. And we all can remember what a brilliant foreign policy genius he was. And yet all that our smug, egomaniacal, narcissistic president, and his team of anti-America zealots can do is to accuse the other side of playing politics with the issue. DISGUSTING!
In questioning foreign service officer Gregory Hicks, who happened to be the number two official at the embassy in Libya at the time of the attack, and who was also one of the recipients of the Jones email, Gowdy asked: "Why in the world would Susan Rice go on five Sunday talk shows and perpetuate a demonstratively false narrative?" To which Mr. Hicks replied, "I cannot provide an answer, but perhaps you should ask Ambassador Rice." Gowdy responded by saying, "I would love the opportunity to do just that." But even if he did have that opportunity, it's pretty much a given that all she would do is to tell even more lies. That's what these people do.
House Speaker John Boehner told a press briefing on Capitol Hill Thursday that there would be more hearings on Benghazi, accusing the White House of doing "everything possible to block access to the information that would outline the truth." He called on the administration to produce previously-unreleased unclassified emails, including the one sent by Jones on Sept. 12. State Department spokesman Patrick Ventrell told a briefing soon after Boehner spoke that the department was "following up with the House directly" regarding the request for emails. Ya, sure they are, let's see how it takes. This group has done nothing but stonewall since day one.
If there's one thing that this whole Benghazi fiasco proves, it's that, once again, the Democrats, in general, have shown that they care far less about the future of the country than they do about their party's political future. Look, we have an administration guilty of abusing its power and of telling all manner of lies to the American people, and yet because it's a Democrat administration we're all just supposed to ignore the fact that four Americans were allowed to be murdered and without a finger being lifted to prevent it. This is a very dark time for this country, and yet most Americans either don't seem to notice or they simply don't care. But we all should expect better from our president.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment