It seems that no matter where I turn these days, I’m told that a majority of my fellow Americans would be just pleased as punch if it were to turn out that Hitlery Clinton would be the one to succeed Barry "Almighty". Personally, I just can’t quite bring myself to join in with that crowd, especially since it’s in my most humble opinion that America would simply never be able to survive having to go through such an ordeal as another Clinton presidency. It would be the final nail in the coffin.
So imagine my surprise, especially after hearing how Hitlery would be an apparent shoe in, if she did in fact choose to run, that according to a new Pew poll out just yesterday that points out that almost two-thirds of Americans want the next president to offer a change from the policies of Barry "Almighty." So which is it? Do Americans want more of the same, or do they truly want something different? To tell you the truth I don’t think they know what the Hell they want anymore.
Also, we’re told that the results of this new poll reveal Barry to be in what’s termed as being a second-term slump, one nearly as deep as the one experienced by former President George W. Bush. And the results are said, or so we’re being told, to likely be bad news for Hitlery or any other potential Democratic contender come 2016. The American electorate is an entity about which few assumptions can be reliably made. So I’m not that certain these numbers can be trusted to mean all that much.
So anyway, this April 23-27 survey questioned 1,501 adults nationwide and it found that 65 percent of those responding wanted the next president to have different programs or policies from those of Barry "Almighty". And it also found that there were 30 percent who wanted programs and policies similar to Barry’s. Now I seriously doubt that it would be all that difficult to determine exactly what the racial makeup of that 30 percent might be. It certainly doesn’t take any sort of a genius.
Meanwhile, it was 70 percent of those who were asked a similar question back in April 2006 that said they wanted different programs or policies from those of the Bush administration in the next president, with only 23 percent preferring similar ones. While I may have wanted something a little different than, what I was hoping for something a bit more conservative in nature, not the version full blown socialism that we got from Barry as he went on his mission to "fundamentally transform" America.
We’re told it was voter desire for change that was one of the main reasons that Barry won the White House in the 2008 election over John ‘The Maverick’ McCain of Arizona. Of course the fact that McCain was a pretty shitty candidate certainly didn’t hurt Barry’s chances for victory either. We hadn’t had a candidate that bad since Bob Dole. So I’m not really sure which of these reasons proved to be the bigger help for Barry. But we certainly could have put up a better candidate than the one we did.
But apparently old Hitlery must not have gotten the memo regarding the results of this very recent poll. Because while she has yet to confirm or deny that she even intends on running to be Barry’s successor, she is certainly has been sounding a lot like a candidate, of late. In fact, it was just today that she made it very clear that she not only supports Obamacare, but she also favors tighter gun control, and said the country faces "social collapse" if inequity continues in America.
Hitlery spoke in National Harbor, Maryland, at the National Council for Behavioral Health, an organization that focuses on mental health. It was during the speech that she gave to the group that she said, "We have to rein in what has become [an] almost article of faith, that anybody can own a gun anywhere, anytime. And I don’t believe that." She needs to get over herself, because it’s not about what she believes, it’s about the Constitution!
She droned on, "At the rate we’re going, we’re going to have so many people with guns everywhere, fully licensed, fully validated, in settings where [one] could be in a movie theater, and they don’t like someone chewing gum loudly or talking on their cellphone and decide they have the perfect right to defend themselves against the gum chewer or cellphone user by shooting. That’s what happens in the countries I’ve visited where there’s no rule of law."
And then in what was perhaps an attempt to silence her critics on the left who may think that she is a bit too aligned with big business, Hitlery also took a more populist tone with the crowd of mostly healthcare professionals. "We need to be honest about what’s happening in our country," she said. "We need [to] take a clear-eyed view about some of the causes of this social collapse." Of course her perception of what the causes might be differ greatly from those of us on the right.
Because, like Barry, this fellow Alinskyite of his said, "The debate about economic inequality is often carried out in political terms or economic terms, but it’s social, it’s a psychological challenge. We need to start demonstrating our care for one another, particularly those that are struggling the hardest." So once again we hearing about how it takes a village. Why must that always be the only solution? Socialism
And of course Hitlery defended Obamacare. She said, "There have been many complaints and concerns about the Affordable Care Act, but I’ve been struck by the polling I’ve been reading." She added, "Because it tells the same story: A small majority of Americans don’t think they like the Affordable Care Act, but a large majority of Americans don’t want to do away with the protections that are in the Affordable Care Act."
Staying on the topic of Obamacare, she continued by saying, "A small majority wants to repeal it, but that is slowly receding as a rising majority says, 'No, fix it.' This is the tradition of good, old-fashioned American pragmatism." I’m just not thinking that it’s so small of a majority that wants it repealed. And the number of those who want it repealed are most certainly not decreasing in number. So Hitlery is of course talking out her ass.
So to me it sounds like the old battle-axe is wanting to pretty much pick right up where the ‘community agitator’ plans on leaving off. I can’t believe that this is what the American people will come to want. How is it that a majority in this country will be able to look back at, what will then be at least, the last seven years and say, "YES, give me four more years of that!" As I have said before, on a number of occasions, America simply will not survive Hitlery as president.
No comments:
Post a Comment