It’s been since the most recent election that we’ve been witnessing shades of 2016 when everyone and their brother was coming with all manner of excuses as to why it was that Hitlery ended up having her rather sizable ass handed to her by then political novice, Donald J. Trump and in rather humiliating fashion. I say that because if we fast forward eight years, we find that which was old is now new again. Because it was then that another female Democrat had her rather sizable ass handed to her by the much less of a political novice, President Donald J. Trump. And it is once again that excuses abound for her defeat that was just as humiliating as the one in 2016.
One of those floating excuses for Cumala’s defeat is
supposed Democrat strategist James Carville. Carville admitted that he was
“wrong about the 2024 election” in recent a New York Times op-ed, stating that
President Trump defeated Cumala by “putting the economic anger of Americans
front and center.” When was the last time you heard a Democrat, any Democrat,
actually admit they were wrong about anything? Carville, whose only claim to
fame is getting ‘Slick Willy’ Clinton across the finish line first in a
three-man race, conceded that his belief that Cumala would beat President Trump
in the days leading up to November 5, was incorrect.
His opinion piece, published Thursday, began with,
“I thought Kamala Harris would win. I was wrong. While I’m sure we Democrats
can argue that the loss wasn’t a landslide or take a little solace in our House
performance, the most important thing for us now is to face that we were wrong
and take action on the prevailing ‘why.'” Carville went on to argue that the
reason behind the Democratic Party’s failure to hold on to the White House was,
is, and “always will be the economy, stupid.” Sorry Jimmy, it’s not just the
economy. It’s also illegal immigration, DEI, attacks on Christians and all the
gender perversion were very important to Americans.
Anyway, he said, “I’ve been going over this in my
head for the past two months, all the variables, all the what-ifs, all the
questions about Joe Biden’s re-election decisions and what kind of Democrat or
message might have worked against Donald Trump. I keep coming back to the same
thing. We lost for one very simple reason: It was, it is and it always will be
the economy, stupid. We have to begin 2025 with that truth as our political
north star and not get distracted by anything else.” He then said that most
Americans do not care about President Trump’s indictments or other
controversies when they “cannot provide for themselves or their families."
Carville called on Democrats to stop focusing on President
Trump in general because he cannot be elected again. He wrote, “Mr. Trump won
the popular vote by putting the economic anger of Americans front and center.
If we focus on anything else, we risk falling farther into the abyss,” before
concluding that Democrats will “live or die by winning public perception of the
economy.” But Democrats are clueless when it comes to the economy. And despite what
Hiterly once said about the economy always being better when there’s a Democrat
in the White House, old Joey definitely proved that that wasn’t the case.
Thanks to Joey our economy is in a shambles.
I still can’t figure out why those in the ‘fake
news’ media insist upon trotting this decrepit old cadaver out every election
cycle even though he hasn’t been right about anything for decades. And I really
think it’s very few people who actually care about what this moron has to say.
In an October op-ed for the New York Times, titled, “Three Reasons I’m Certain
Kamala Harris Will Win,” Carville wrote that “Mr. Trump is a repeat electoral
loser. This time will be no different.” He wrote, “The biggest reason Mr. Trump will
lose is that the whole Republican Party has been on a losing streak since Mr.
Trump took it over.” Carville was again grasping at straws.
And it was in an MSDNC interview just two days
before the election that Carville doubled down and, sounding like a truly
credible and rational individual, claimed that Cumala would defeat President
Trump because the Republican is “stone ass nuts.” And Carville then had a complete
meltdown on his podcast shortly after President Trump won the election saying
it was “sickening” and “depressing” that a “felonious bigot” won the presidency
once again. All we get from those like Carville is just more of the same. They’re
all far more interested in attacking President Trump than they are in looking
within themselves to see what most Americans see when looking at them.
These left-wing liberal/progressives are still
struggling to understand why they have been rejected by the majority of
Americans. To all rational thinking Americans, it’s very clear why Cumala lost,
and it was due to many issues, not just one. Let’s face it, it was in Cumala
that the Democrats has a babbling, unelectable, blowjob queen of the California
State Capitol. A lying prosecutor of mostly black fellas for offenses that did
not merit the harsh sentences that were handed down. Carville is a lot of
things but even he wasn’t dumb enough to actually believe Cumala was going to
win. All of Democrats internal polling showed she was going to lose, and likely
lose big.
That’s why they resorted to the “fascist” and “threat
to democracy” attacks. You don’t go negative like that when you’re confident
about winning. Carville is just lying. Again. It didn't matter to Carville that
the Democrat candidate was a chuckleheaded DEI dud, and it didn't matter that
all of their party policies are toxic and destructive. All that mattered to him
was Democrat victory, so he jumped into the propaganda parade because he
believed he is just so far above everybody else when it comes to delivering the
verbal axe blow to a political opponent. This Carville evaluation about the
economy is somewhat true for Cumala, but not as a single fallacy.
The open border, a woke military, tolerance of
transgender demands on society, a foreign policy no enemy ever feared, were all
part of the country saying a big fat fuck you to the Democrats. Why listen to
Carville? When was the last time he actually accomplished a goal? The economy
was part of it, but asking us to lie and pretend men are women was part too, so
was her astounding ignorance, so was her fear of unscripted interviews. Remember
she couldn’t get enough support to make it to Iowa in the prior election cycle.
She had worse numbers in California, where people know her, than elsewhere. She
was likely the only politician less likable than Hitlery.
There are many reasons she
couldn’t win, even with more than the billion she spent. If Carville was worth
his salt he could have seen that before she was nominated, but he didn’t. Carville
continues to spout hot air as if he’s relevant. He was too stupid to figure out
that the Democrat candidate was a moron and lost because she wanted to implement
Marxist economic principles which would destroy the economy. Carville is a
poster child for what happens to your mind and soul when you combine end stage dementia
with alcoholism. What a mean vile old man. The only people who vote for Democrats
are the racists, the elites and the welfare crowd addicted to free stuff.
No comments:
Post a Comment